underground transmission capacity increases from dynamic rating … · 2016. 12. 9. · summary z...

27
Underground Transmission Capacity Increases from Dynamic Rating Analysis Erich Schoennagel, PE CenterPoint Energy

Upload: others

Post on 21-Oct-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Underground Transmission Capacity Increasesfrom Dynamic Rating Analysis

    Erich Schoennagel, PECenterPoint Energy

  • Background

    In 2000, CenterPoint Energy began an ampacity study of 138kV Polk to Garrott circuitAddition of new Midtown SubstationInvestigate methods to increase capacity

  • Circuit Detail

    138kV UndergroundHPFF Cable8 inch pipe2500 Kcmil conductorOil Dielectric Rated 257 MVA Installed in 1966

  • Circuit Route

    Downtown Houston12,300 feet

  • Approach

    Evaluate dielectric fluid for evidence of agingEvaluate paper insulation agingInstall DTS fiber for temperature profileEvaluate impact of crossing pipe-type cable circuit

  • Testing

    DGA test on oil performed by Detroit EdisonField Dissipation test performed on paper insulationResult showed cables virtually un-aged from initial installation

  • DTS Installation

    Distributed Thermal Sensing (DTS)Installed in parallel ductMulti-mode fiber optic

  • DTS Midtown to Polk Hot SpotHot Spot

  • Ampacity Considerations

    Association of Edison Illuminating Companies CS2 recommends reducing max conductor temperature from 85C to 75C when environmental conditions are unknownCenterPoint Energy followed AEIC and rated circuit at 75CStudy of circuit allowed 85C uprateTypically this would increase ampacity by 20%

  • Unfortunately, even with a 10C increase, the result was a 3.4% decrease in ampacity due to crossing circuit hot spot

  • DTCR Consideration

    Polk to Garrott circuit has a cyclical load patternShort duration of high loadsThe long thermal time constant of underground HPFF circuits is approximately 130 hours

  • Load Pattern

  • DTCR Model

    Modified to support a real time temperature interference from a measured sourceThis was used to model heating influence from a cable crossingRun in simulated mode using summer 2000 data

  • DTCR Result

    Using summer 2000 data, DTCR showed an increase of almost 21% in dynamic rating over the conventional book rating

  • DTCR Components

    ThermocouplesSCADASimple PC

  • DTCR Output

    Calculated conductor temperatureReported AmperageAllowable AmperageInput parametersTime remaining to thermal overload

  • 0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    07/02

    /07 00

    :00:00

    CDT

    07/09

    /07 02

    :30:00

    CDT

    07/16

    /07 05

    :00:00

    CDT

    07/23

    /07 07

    :30:00

    CDT

    07/30

    /07 10

    :00:00

    CDT

    09/06

    /07 04

    :00:00

    CDT

    09/13

    /07 06

    :30:00

    CDT

    09/20

    /07 09

    :00:00

    CDT

    09/27

    /07 11

    :30:00

    CDT

    10/04

    /07 05

    :30:00

    CDT

    10/11

    /07 08

    :00:00

    CDT

    10/18

    /07 10

    :30:00

    CDT

    10/25

    /07 13

    :00:00

    CDT

    11/02

    /07 07

    :00:00

    CDT

    11/09

    /07 08

    :30:00

    CST

    11/16

    /07 11

    :00:00

    CST

    11/23

    /07 13

    :30:00

    CST

    11/30

    /07 16

    :00:00

    CST

    12/07

    /07 11

    :00:00

    CST

    12/14

    /07 13

    :30:00

    CST

    12/21

    /07 16

    :00:00

    CST

    01/05

    /08 22

    :50:00

    CST

    01/13

    /08 01

    :20:00

    CST

    01/20

    /08 03

    :50:00

    CST

    01/27

    /08 06

    :20:00

    CST

    02/02

    /08 18

    :00:00

    CST

    02/06

    /08 21

    :00:00

    CST

    02/11

    /08 00

    :00:00

    CST

    02/15

    /08 03

    :00:00

    CST

    Dynamic Normal Rating Static Normal RatingActual (amps) Static 300 hr Rating

    Polk to Midtown Load History

    Am

    pere

    s

  • Polk to Midtown Ratings (2/29/08)

    Static Normal Rating = 1035 amperes300 hour Rating = 1180 amperesDynamic Normal Rating = 1311 amperesEmergency

    Thermal Limit

  • What have we gained?

    TimeEstablish a five part upgrade plan– Dynamic rating– Shuttle oil– Additional pipe for circulating

    Design is ready

    – Reconductor– Add a parallel circuit

  • DTCR Implementation

    Ampacity increaseRTO tool during high circuit loadGrid operator predictive tool

  • Future Use of DTCR

    XLPE Underground CablesOverhead circuits

  • Summary

    Ampacity study of Polk to Garrott showed a decrease in book rating using steady state calculationsDTCR takes advantage of cyclical load pattern and thermal response of UG cable Dynamic rating uses real-time temperature and load inputPolk to Garrott ampacity increased almost 21%System operators have a better information toolMarket predictive tool

  • Project Team

    EPRI - Cable system assessment- DTCR developmentPower Delivery Consultants, Inc.- DTCR development- Ampacity study and condition assessmentUlrich Associates, Inc.- Software development

  • Questions?

  • DTS Correlation

  • Utilities Using DTCR

    Southern California Edison (XLPE cable)PECO Energy (pipe type cable)BC Hydro (submarine SCFF cable)United Illuminating Co. (pipe type cable)ComEd (XLPE cable)