undergraduate engineering program (tier-ii) nba sar july 2019 .pdfself-assessment report (sar)...

1

SELF-ASSESSMENT REPORT (SAR)

UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING PROGRAM (TIER-II)

U.G. (B.TECH) – CIVIL ENGINEERING

FIRST TIME ACCREDITATION

National Board of Accreditation (NBA)

Anil Neerukonda Institute Of Technology & Sciences

(Autonomous)

(Permanently Affiliated to AU, Approved by AICTE, Accredited by NAAC with ‘A’ Grade) Sangivalasa-531162, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam Dt.

Phone: 08933-225083/84 Fax: 08933- 226395 Website: www.anits.edu.in email: [email protected]

2

CONTENTS

Item Description Page Nos.

PART-A Institutional Information 4

PART-B Criteria Summary 8

Program Level Cr iter ia

Criterion 1 Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives 9

Criterion 2 Program Curriculum and Teaching – Learning Processes 15

Criterion 3 Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes 44

Criterion 4 Student ‘s Performance 76

Criterion 5 Faculty Information and Contributions 93

Criterion 6 Facilities and Technical Support 107

Criterion 7 Continuous Improvement 114

Institute Level Criteria

Criterion 8 First year Academics 132

Criterion 9 Student Support Systems 152

Criterion 10 Governance, Institutional Support And Financial Resources 163

PART-C Dec laration by the Instit ution 176

Annexures Annexure-1 to Annexure-20 177-222

3

LIST OF ANNEXURES

Description Page No.

1. Program Outcomes (POs) and Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs) 178

2. Mid Exam Question Paper (Andhra University) 179

3. Mid Exam Question Paper (R15) 181

4. Project Review Circular 183

5. Project Work Evaluation proforma 184

6. External BoS (Civil) Members list 185

7. Industrial Training Viva Circular, Evaluation Form 186

8. Record of Attainment of Cos 2 to 8th Semesters (2nd to 4th year) 188

9. Exit Survey Form 196

10. Feedback from Parents form 197

11. Recruiters Feedback form 198

12. Faculty Information 199

13. Faculty Publications 207

14. Performance Appraisal Form 212

15. Academic Audit Form 217

16. Record of CO Attainment (I Year Courses CAY) 225

17. Counseling Batches CAY, CAY m1, CAY m2 227

18. Students Feedback Form with Cover letter 230

19. Organization chart and Administration set up 232

20. Grievance Redressal Committee Members 233

4

Part A

1. Name and Address of the Institution

Anil Neerukonda Institute of Technology & Sciences Sangivalasa Bheemunipatnam Mandal Visakhapatnam District – 531 162

Andhra Pradesh, India

2. Name and Address of Affiliating University

Andhra University Visakhapatnam - 530 003,

Andhra Pradesh, India.

3. Year of establishment of the Institution:

2001-02

4. Type of the Institution:

Autonomous

5. Ownership Status:

Self Financing (Society)

Anil Neerukonda Educational Society

Sangivalasa, Bheemunipatnam Mandal,

Visakhapatnam District-531162

Andhra Pradesh India

Society Regd. Number 2314 of 2000

6. Other Academic Institutions of the Trust/Society/Company etc., if any:

Table A.6

Name of the Institution Year of

Establishment Programs of

Study Location

American NRI College of Nursing 2008 Nursing Sangivalasa Bheemunipatnam Mandal VISAKHAPATNAM– 531 162 Andhra Pradesh, India

NRI Institute of Medical Sciences (MBBS)

2012 MBBS

Anil Neerukonda Institute of Dental Sciences

2013 Dental

5

7. Details of all the programs being offered by the institution under consideration:

S. No.

Program Name

Name of the Dept.

Year of

Start

Intake Increase in

intake

Year of increase

Year of initial AICTE

approval

Accreditation Status

Accreditation Period

1 UG - B.Tech.

ECE 2001 60 120 180

2005 2014

2001

Granted accreditation for three years.

June, 2016-June, 2019

2 UG - B.Tech.

EEE 2001 40 60

120 180

2002 2009 2014

2001

3 UG - B.Tech.

CSE 2001 60 120 180

2008 2015

2001

4 UG - B.Tech.

INF 2001 60 120 180

2015 2017

2001

5 UG - B.Tech.

MEC 2005 60 120 180 240

2009 2014 2015

2005

6 UG - B.Tech.

CIV 2011 60 NA NA 2011 Applying first time

---

7 UG - B.Tech.

CHE 2012 60 NA NA 2012 Applying first time

---

8 PG - MTECH.

CST 2010 18 NA NA 2010

Not accredited

---

9 PG - MTECH

Control Systems

2010 18 NA NA 2010 ---

10 PG - MTECH

Communication Systems

2011 18 NA NA 2011 ---

11 PG - MTECH

Machine Design

2012 18 NA NA 2012 ---

12 PG - MTECH

Soil Mechanics 2017 18 NA NA 2017 ---

8. Programs to be considered for Accreditation vide this application:

S.

No.

Level Discipline Program

1 Under Graduate Engineering & Technology Civil Engineering

2 Under Graduate Engineering & Technology Chemical Engineering

6

9. Total number of employees in the institution:

a) Regular Employees (Faculty and Staff):

Items

Gen

der

CAY (2018-19)

CAYm1 (2017-18)

CAYm2 (2016-17)

CAYm3 (2015-16)

Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max

Teaching staff in Engineering M 143 153 134 142 112 124 102 111

F 70 73 72 79 67 72 57 62

Teaching faculty in Science and Humanities

M 25 27 23 25 24 24 22 24

F 20 21 21 24 20 22 19 22

Non- Teaching staff M 98 107 115 118 111 119 108 119

F 26 32 32 36 32 39 22 28

b) Contractual* Employees (Faculty and Staff):

Items

Gen

der

CAY (2018-19)

CAYm1 (2017-18)

CAYm2 (2016-17)

CAYm3 (2015-16)

Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max

Teaching staff in Engineering

M 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5

F 0 0 - - - - - -

Teaching faculty in Science and Humanities

M 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

F 0 0 - - - - - -

Non- Teaching staff M 0 0 - - - - - -

F 0 0 - - - - - -

10. Total number of Engineering Students:

Engineering and Technology – UG Shift – 1

Items CAY

2018-19

CAYm1

2017-18

CAYm2

2016-17

CAYm3

2015-16

Total No. of Boys 3147 2923 2534 2242

Total No. of Girls 1239 1261 1201 1101

Total 4386 4184 3735 3343

7

Engineering and Technology – PG Shift – 1

Items CAY

2018-19

CAYm1

2017-18

CAYm2

2016-17

CAYm3

2015-16

Total No. of Boys 27 27 23 45

Total No. of Girls 20 22 22 34

Total 47 49 45 79

11. Vision of the Institution:

ANITS envisions to emerge as a world-class technical institution whose products represent a good

blend of technological excellence and the best of human values.

12. Mission of the Institution:

To train young men and women into competent and confident engineers with excellent

communicational skills, to face the challenges of future technology changes, by imparting holistic

technical education using the best of infrastructure, outstanding technical and teaching expertise

and an exemplary work culture, besides molding them into good citizens.

13. Contact Information of the Head of the Institution and NBA coordinator, if designated:

Head of the Institution & NBA Coordinator

Name : Prof. T. V. Hanumantha Rao Designation : Principal Mobile No : 09441011735, 07330789892 Fax : 08933 226395 Email ID : [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

8

Part B Criteria Summary

Name of the Program: B.Tech. (U.G.) CIVIL ENGINEERING

Criteria No.

Criter ia Marks /Weightage

Program Level Cr iter ia

1 Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives 60

2 Program Curriculum and Teaching – Learning

Processes 120

3 Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes 120

4 Student ‘s Performance 150

5 Faculty Information and Contributions 200

6 Facilities and Technical Support 80

7 Continuous Improvement 50

Institute Level Criteria

8 First year Academics 50

9 Student Support Systems 50

10 Governance, Institutional Support And Financial Resources

120

Total 1000

9

CRITERION 1 Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives 60

1. VISION, MISSION AND PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES (60) 1.1. State the Vision and Mission of the Department and Institute (5) (Vision statement typically indicates aspirations and Mission statement states the broad

approach to achieve aspirations) (Here Institute Vision and Mission statements have been asked to ensure consistency with

the department Vision and Mission statements; the assessment of the Institute Vision and

Mission will be taken up in Criterion 10)

Vision and Mission of the department

Vision

Our Vision is to be among the pre -eminent Civil Engineering Departments of the Country and the

World for building future Civil Engineers characterized by technological excellence and human values.

Mission

Our Mission is Education. We achieve this mission through teaching, research, and consultancy in Civil

Engineering with creativity, quality, sustainability, service and values as the foundational hall marks.

Vision and Mission of the institute

Vision:

ANITS envisions to emerge as a world-class technical institution whose products represent a good blend

of technological excellence and the best of human values.

Mission:

To train young men and women into competent and confident engineers with excellent communi cational

skills, to face the challenges of future technology changes, by imparting holistic technical education

using the best of infrastructure, outstanding technical and teaching expertise and an exemplary work

culture, besides moulding them into good citizens.

1.2. State the Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) (5) (State the PEOs (3 to 5) of program seeking accreditation)

Program Educational Objectives (PEOs)

The Program is expected to enable the students, within 3 to 5 years of their graduation, to:

1. Engage successfully in the practice of civil engineering profession within industry, government, or

through private practice, post-graduate studies or alternate career paths.

2. Analyze, design and build safe, sustainable and economical civil engineering structures by applying

their knowledge in one or more of the major areas of civil engineering, including environmental,

geotechnical, structural, transportation, and water resources.

3. Apply the knowledge of mathematics, basic science, core and civil engineering to the formulation

and solution of complex engineering problems as members of multidisciplinary teams.

4. Develop their communication skills and leadership skills and become competent, ethical and

responsible professionals

5. Engage in life-long learning and service to their profession for betterment of society and environment

10

1.3. Indicate where the Vision, Mission and PEOs are published and disseminated among

stakeholders (10)

(Describe where (websites, curricula, posters etc.) the Vision, Mission and PEOs are published

and detail the process which ensures awareness among internal and external stakeholders with effective process implementation)

(Internal stakeholders may include Management, Governing Board Members, faculty,

support staff, students etc. and external stakeholders may include employers, industry, alumni,

funding agencies, etc.)

The vision, mission and PEOs, along with POs, are published and disseminated among the stake

holders through various avenues as given in Table B 1.3. This is expected to ensure awareness

among internal and external stake holders.

Table B 1.3 Publication and dissemination of Vision, Mission and PEOs (along with POs)

S. No.

Where published/disseminated Target stake holders

1 Institute/Department website

(http://civil.anits.edu.in)

Students, parents, faculty; alumni, Industry,

Management.

2 Annual Symposium website

(http://vinirmithi.anitscivil.edu.in)

Students, parents, faculty; alumni, industry.

3 Prospectus Management, Governing Body Members,

faculty, students and parents.

4 Syllabus book Students, Faculty, Parents, M anagement,

Governing Body Members, BoS (Civil)

Members, Academic council members.

5 College annual magazine (ECHOES) Students, Faculty, Parents, Management

6 Civil Engineering News Letter Students, Faculty, Parents, Industry,

Alumni, Employers, Management,

Governing Body Members, BoS (Civil)

Members, Department Advisory committee

members.

7 Display boards:

Department Main corridor, notice board,

HOD cabin, Faculty cabins, Laboratories

Students, Parents, Faculty, Industry,

Support staff, Management and Alumni.

8 e-mail Employers, Industry, Alumni, Funding

agencies, Governing Body Members, Board

of Studies Members, Academic Council

9 Interaction meetings:

Faculty Meetings, HOD’s interaction with

support staff and students.

Faculty, Support Staff, Students.

11

S. No.

Where published/disseminated Target stake holders

10 Department Profile (PPT):

NAAC, NBA, Autonomous, AU Affiliation

Committee Visits, Department Advisory

Committee Meetings, other

academic/professional activities in the

Department.

Andhra University, NAAC, NBA, UGC,

Industry

1.4. State the process for defining the Vision and Mission of the Department, and PEOs of the

program (25)

(Articulate the process for defining the Vision and Mission of the department and PEOs of the

program)

The process for defining Vision and Mission of the Department and PEOs of the program is illustrated

in Fig. B 1.4.

Vision, Mission and PEOs of the Department are evolved by review and ratification by the Department

Academic Planning and monitoring committee based on

(i) Vision and Mission of the Institute,

(ii) Vision, Mission and PEOs of reputed Institutions such as MIT downloaded from Google

(iii) NBA - Program Outcomes

And also based on feedback obtained from

i) inspections by AU Affiliation, NAAC and UGC Autonomous Committees

ii) Recruiters and Employers,

iii) Principal/Management

iv) Parents, Alumni

And HoD’s interaction meetings with

i) BoS (Civil) members,

ii) Department Advisory committee meetings

iii) industry experts delivering guest lectures

iv) Brainstorming sessions in faculty meetings

v) students and staff

Periodic review of vision, mission and PEOs is made annually through the Brainstorming sessions in faculty

meetings and ratified by the Academic Planning and monitoring Committee.

12

Fig B.1.4: Process for defining Vision, Mission and PEOs

1.5. Establish consistency of PEOs with Mission of the Department (15) (Generate a “Mission of the Department – PEOs matrix” with justification and rationale of the Mapping) Note: In this document wherever the term ‘Process’ has been used its meaning is process

formulation, notification and implementation.

The Mission of the Department-PEOs matrix is presented in Table B 1.5 below

13

Table B 1.5 Program PEOs-Department Mission Matrix

PEO Statements M1: Education

M2: Teaching

M3: Research

M4: Consultancy in

Civil Engineering

M5: Creativity

M6: Quality

M7: Sustainability

M8: Service and

values

1. Engage successfully in the practice of civil

engineering profession within industry,

government, or through private practice, post-

graduate studies or alternate career paths.

3 3 1 1 2 3 2 2

2. Analyze, design and build safe, sustainable and

economical civil engineering structures by applying

their knowledge in one or more of the major areas

of civil engineering, including environmental,

geotechnical, structural, transportation and water

resources.

3 3 1 2 2 3 3 1

3. Apply the knowledge of mathematics, basic

science, core and civil engineering to the

formulation and solution of complex engineering

problems as members of multidisciplinary teams.

3 3 2 2 2 3 1 -

4. Develop their communication skills and leadership

skills and become competent, ethical and

responsible professionals

3 3 - - 2 3 1 3

5. Engage in life-long learning and service to their

profession for betterment of society and

environment

3 3 2 2 2 3 2 3

Legend: 1: Slight (Low); 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High) “-”: there is no correlation

14

Justification and Rationale 1) Education (M1) and Teaching (M2) are the two core elements of the Department Mission and

strongly correlate with all the PEOs of the program.

2) Research (M3) activity of the faculty members percolating into the T-L process slightly contributes to the PEO1 and PEO2, while it moderately contributes to realize the PEO3 and PEO5

3) Consultancy (M4) activity of the faculty contributes to PEO1 slightly, while it moderately helps to realize PEO2, PEO3 and PEO5.

4) Creativity (M5) in Teaching, Research and Consultancy moderately helps to achieve all PEOs of the program.

5) Sustained Quality (M6) in all the Activities of the Department when maintained substantially contributes to realization of all PEOs of the program.

6) The recent concept of sustainability (M7) correlates with PEO2 substantially, PEO1 & PEO5 moderately and other PEOs slightly.

7) Service and values (M8), another set of key elements of the Department Mission, help to realize the PEO4 & PEO5 substantially, PEO1 moderately and PEO2 slightly.

15

CRITERION 2 Program Curriculum and Teaching – Learning Processes 120

2. PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING - LEARNING PROCESSES (120)

2.1. Program Curriculum (20)

2.1.1. State the process used to identify extent of compliance of the University curriculum for attaining

the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes as mentioned in Annexure-1. Also mention the

identified curricular gaps, if any (10)

(State the process details; also mention identified curricular gaps)

Process Details

ANITS is affiliated to Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, and hence the syllabus/curriculum prescribed by

the university is followed. Andhra University is one of the oldest (estd.1926) and renowned universities

and among the top ranking (NIRF 2018: 36) universities in the country. Generally Curriculum maintains the

balance in the composition of Basic Sciences, Humanities and Social Sciences including Management

courses, Engineering Sciences, Professional core and elective courses, Project work and industrial training

Courses.

The institute was accorded Autonomous status by UGC with effect from the Academic year 2015-16

(CAYm3). The regulations followed in the last three academic years is shown in Table B 2.1.1a

Table B 2.1.1a

Year of the B.Tech Program

Applicable Academic Regulations

CAYm2 (2016-17) CAYm1 (2017-18) CAY (2018-19)

I Year Autonomous Regulations R15

Autonomous Regulations R15


II Year Autonomous Regulations R15



III Year Andhra University Regulations R14



IV Year Andhra University Regulations R07

Andhra University Regulations R14


The process used to identify the extent of compliance of University curriculum for attaining POs and PSOs

i.e., the process to identify the curricular gaps is illustrated in Fig. B 2.1.1.

The extent of compliance of the University curriculum for attaining POs and PSOs is assessed based on

1) Feedback given by Recruiters in Campus Placements and by prospective Employers

2) Inputs given by Principal/Management in HoDs’ meetings

3) Feedback given by visiting expert committee members during University Affiliation inspection,

NAAC accreditation, UGC Autonomous inspection, NBA accreditation of other department

programs

4) Feedback given by industry experts visiting for guest lectures / technical fests/ Workshops/ other

events organized by the Department from time to time

5) Feedback given by external examiners from Andhra University during End semester practical

examinations

16

6) Feedback by visiting expert members during Department Advisory Committee meetings

7) Feedback given by faculty members handling the courses or attending FDPs/ STTPs

8) Feedback given by students in exit surveys

9) Feedback given by alumni

Fig. B 2.1.1 Process for Identification of Curricular gaps

The feedback obtained as above is reviewed in faculty meetings in general and Academic planning and

monitoring committee of the Department in particular and the curricular gaps are identified. The curricular

gaps, as shown in Table B 2.1.1b , belong to one or more of the following categories:

(I) The students exhibit inadequate aptitude and communication skills (PO1, PO2, PO10, PSO1,

PSO2)

(II) The students exhibit inadequate knowledge of certain topics in Civil Engineering (PO2, PSO1)

(III) The students are unable to adequately apply their knowledge to practical problems due to

inadequate exposure to real-time construction projects (PO6, PO7, PSO3)

(IV) There is need for providing exposure to students in using equipment or software currently

used in the industry (PO5, PSO2)

17

Table B 2.1.1b Curricular Gaps Identified

S. No.

Gap Identified Relevance to

POs PSOs I Inadequate aptitude and communication skills 2,3,4,9,10,12 1,2

II

Topics in civil engineering not covered in each course in the curriculum. The list is exhaustive and these topics covered by respective faculty members are included in Table B 2.1.2B

All All Courses not covered in the curriculum such as Engineering economics and finance (included in Autonomous Regulations R15)

III Inadequate ability to apply theory to practical problems

2 to 8, 11,12 1,2,3 Lack of Exposure to real time construction projects or practical problems

IV Exposure to Equipment and software currently used in the industry

5 2

2.1.2. State the delivery details of the content beyond the syllabus for the attainment of POs and PSOs (10)

The activities, which are in place in the Department for bridging the curricular gaps so as to attain POs and PSOs, are illustrated in Table B 2.1.2a

Table B 2.1.2a Activities for bridging the Curricular gaps

S. No.

Activities in place in the Department for bridging the Curricular gaps

Nature of curricular gap

Relevance to POs/ PSOs

I II III IV

1 Additional course “English lab” in I Year √ PO10, PSO2

2 Quantitative & Verbal Aptitude classes for III year students

√ PO1, PO2, PSO3

3 Campus Recruitment Training Classes by T&P Cell √ PO1, PO2, PSO3

4 Organizing Workshops/Guest Lectures/Symposia for students

√ √ √ √ All POs and PSOs

5 Student seminars on recent technologies √ √ √ √ PO2 to PO7, PO10 to PO12, All PSOs

6 Student participation in Workshops/Symposia at other institutes

√ √ √ √ PO2 to PO7, PO10 to

PO12, All PSOs

7 Industrial visits √ √ √ √ All POs, All PSOs

8 Coverage of Topics beyond curriculum by faculty in each subject

√ √ PO2-PO7, PO10-PO12, All PSOs

9 Faculty seminars on topics from research journals √ √ √ PO2-PO7, PO10, PO12, All PSOs

10 Civil Engineering News letter √ √ √ √ All POs, All PSOs

11 Wall Paper √ √ √ √ All POs, All PSOs

12 Student Paper publications √ √ √ √ All POs, All PSOs

13 College Annual Magazine √ √ √ All POs, All PSOs

18

S. No.

Activities in place in the Department for bridging the Curricular gaps

Nature of curricular gap

Relevance to POs/ PSOs

I II III IV

14 Project work with recent technologies √ √ √ PO2 to PO7

15 Pedagogical initiatives by faculty (see Fig. B 2.2.1b) √ √ PO2 to PO5, PO7, PO12, PSO1, PSO2

16 Organizing FDPs/Workshops for faculty √ √ PO2 to PO7

17 Faculty participation in FDPs/STTPs/Conferences √ √ PO2 to PO7

18 Faculty Research & Consultancy √ √ PO2 to PO7

19 Use of Internet by students for browsing journals, NPTEL courses, e-books and other Google resources

√ √ √ All POs, All PSOs

20 Solving GATE problems by students √ √ All POs, All PSOs

21 Special classes in GATE √ √ All POs, All PSOs

22 On-line GATE exams √ √ All POs, All PSOs

23 Interaction with Alumni √ √ √ All POs, All PSOs

24 Procurement of latest Equipment/Software √ PO5, PSO2

25 NSS programs √ PO6 to PO12, PSO2, PSO3

26 Student Club activities √ PO8, PO9, PO10, PO12, PSO2

27 Games and Sports events √ PO8, PO9, PO10, PSO2

Legend: Nature of Curricular gap:

(I) The students exhibit inadequate aptitude and communication skil ls (PO1, PO2, PO10, PSO1, PSO2)

(II) The students exhibit inadequate knowledge of c ertain topics in Civil Engineering (PO2, PSO1)

(III) The students are unable to adequately apply their knowledge to practical problems due to inadequate

exposure to real -time construction projects (PO6, PO7, PSO3)

(IV) There is need for providing exposure to students in using equipment or software currently used in the

industry (PO5, PSO2)

Details of Delivery of the Content beyond the syllabus through these activities for attainment of the

relevant POs and PSOs for the last three academic years are provided in Table B 2.1.2b along with the

relevant POs/PSOs

19

Tables B 2.1.2b Delivery details of the Content beyond the syllabus

CAY 2018 – 19

S. No

Curricular Gap Delivery beyond the syllabus

Date-Month-Year

Resource person with designation

% of Students

Relevance to

POs PSOs

1 Aptitude Skills Campus Recruitment Training

11-06-2018 to 16-06-2018

ANITS QA/VA Faculty 100 1 1

2 Clay mineralogy and soil structure (Geotechnical Engineering-I)

Faculty Seminar 11-07-2018 Dr. B.N.D.Narasinga Rao, Professor and Head, Civil, ANITS

98 1,2 1

3 Beam column joints (Steel Structures)

Faculty Seminar 23-07-2018 MKSSK Chaitanya

78 1,2 1

4 Yield line analysis of slab (Reinforced Concrete Structures – I)

Faculty Seminar 31-07-2018

J Vikranth

97 1,2 1

5 Axial thrust diagram for beams (Strength of Materials)

Faculty Seminar 03-08-2018 J Vikranth

89 1,2 1

6 Analysis of multi-storey frames by approximate methods. (Structural Analysis – II)

Faculty Seminar 04-08-2018 PVRK Reddy

77 1,2 1

7 Aptitude & Verbal Skills Musigma CRT Classes

04-08-2018 ANITS QA/VA Faculty 100 1 1

8 Career Orientation Career Options after Engineering

10-08-2018 Mr.Vamsi, Director Global Edge

100 1,2 1

9 Calculation of wind speed and wind pressure (Steel Structures)

Faculty Seminar 20-08-2018 MKSSK Chaitanya

84 1,2 1

10 Aptitude & Verbal Skills TCS Specific Training

27-08-2018 to 01-09-18


11 Analysis of fixed parabolic arches (Structural Analysis – II)


79 1,2 1

12 Aptitude & Verbal Skills Infosys Specific Training

10-09-2018 to 15-09-2018


20

S. No


Date-Month-Year


% of Students

Relevance to

POs PSOs

13 Industrial Exposure

Industrial Visit to Thotapalli Reservior, Parvathipuram.

22-09-2018

Sri.T.V.Viswa Teja, M.Premchand, M.Nagalakshmi, Assistant Professors, ANITS

88 6,7,9,12 2,3

14 Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (UASBR) (Environmental Engineering –II)

Faculty Seminar 26-09-2018 J H V Reddy

94 1,2 1

15 Hierarchy of Management (Project Planning & Management)

Faculty Seminar 29-09-2018 T. V. Viswa Teja

71 11 -

16 Slip form Technique (Building Technology)

Faculty Seminar 01-10-2018 Ch.Srinivas

80 1,2 1

17 Breakwater Curves (Transportation Engineering – II)

Faculty Seminar 04-10-2018 T. Kiran Kumar

85 1,2 1

18 Reinforcement detailing for slabs, beams, columns and footings. (Reinforced Concrete Structures – I)


83 1,2 1

19 Career planning and prospects in atomic energy

Seminar organized by T&P Cell

08-11-2018 Dr. Sajid, Scientist of BARC (Hyderabad)

100 1,2 1

20 Improving rock stability and quality - rock reinforcement. (Ground Improvement Techniques)

Faculty Seminar 18-12-2018 Ch Vineel

58 1,2 1

21 Soil Nailing Technique for Infrastructure Development

Key Note Address in Workshop on Geotechnical Solutions for Infrastructure Development

29-12-2018 Dr. G L Siva Kumar Babu, Professor of Civil Engg., I.I.Sc. Bengaluru

65 1,2,4,12 1,2

22 Risk Management in Geotechnical Engineering Projects: A few Case studies

Guest Lecture in Workshop on Geotechnical Solutions for Infrastructure Development

29-12-2018 Dr. A Santharam, Professor, ANITS

65 1,2,4,12 1,2

21

S. No


Date-Month-Year


% of Students

Relevance to

POs PSOs

23 Pavement Construction in Expansive soils


29-12-2018

Prof.C.N.V.Satyanarayana Reddy Professor of Civil Engg., Andhra University

65 1,2,4,12 1,2

24 Land, Offshore and Sub-sea Investigations and Solutions


29-12-2018 Sri Srinivasa Raju, CEO, Geomardy, Visakhapatnam

65 1,2,4,12 1,2

25 Fly ash Utilization for Infrastructure Development


29-12-2018 Dr.B.N.D.Narasinga Rao, Professor & Head, Civil, ANITS

65 1,2,4,12 1,2

26 Analysis & Design of Excavation Supporting Systems using Diaphragm Wall: Case Studies


29-12-2018

Sri. Madan Kumar Annam, Head of Engineering, Keller India, Chennai

65 1,2,4,12 1,2

27 Aptitude Skills Campus Recruitment training

03-01-2019 ANITS QA/VA Faculty 100 1 1

28 Traffic Signal Design and Marshall Mix Design (Transportation Engineering – I)

Faculty Seminar 09-01-2019 T. Kiran Kumar

89 1,2 1

29 Aptitude Skills Campus Recruitment training

23-01-19 to 25-01-19


22

S. No


Date-Month-Year


% of Students

Relevance to

POs PSOs


Industrial Visit to RERW Construction site near Anandapuram

24-01-2019 Sri.T.V.Viswa Teja, M.Nagalakshmi, Assistant Professors, ANITS

100 6,7,9,12 2,3

31 Design of pile cap for two piles (Reinforced Concrete Structures – II)


77 1,2 1

32

AutoCAD aided explanation for Long wall and short wall method for Estimation (Estimation & Costing)


65

5 2


Industrial Visit to Polavaram Irrigation Project, west Godavari District, A.P.

19-02-2019

Sri. M.Premchand, J.Harshavardhana ready, M.Nagalakshmi, Assistant Professors, ANITS

81 6,7,9,12 2,3

34 AutoCAD aided explanation for Centre line method for Estimation (Estimation & Costing)


85 5 2

35 Reclaimed soils, land fill gas, Leachate – land fill liners (Ground Improvement Techniques)

Faculty Seminar 26-02-2019 Ch Vineel

61 1,2 1

36 Introduction to remote sensing (Surveying – II)


44 1,2 1

37 Critical depth for pile foundations (Geotechnical Engineering -II)

Faculty Seminar 11-03-2019 Dr. B.N.D. Narasinga Rao, Professor and Head, Civil, ANITS

66 1,2 1

38 Rain water harvesting (Environmental Engineering –I)

Faculty Seminar 15-03-2019 PVR Sravya

87 1,2 1

23


CAYm1 2017 – 18

S. No


Date-Month-Year


% of Students

Relevance to

POs PSOs

1 Employability skills Orientation on Co-Cubes Assessments

28-06-2017 Aon-CoCubes representatives

100 1 1

2 Rain gauge stations in Visakhapatnam (Water Resources Engineering -I)

Faculty Seminar 03-07-2017 Sri Ch. Vineel, Assistant Professor, ANITS

77 1,2 1



96 1,2 1

4 Attitude, Professionalism, response dynamics, Inter personal skills


16-08-2017 to 24-08-2017

Focus Academy for Career Enhancement (FACE)

100 1 1

5 Aptitude Skills

Infosys Specific Campus Recruitment Training

5-09-2017 to 19-09-2017


6 Geotechnical Investigation at Shivalik Mountain Range

Guest Lecture 15-09-2017 Dr. A. Santha Ram, Senior Mining Geologist, (Retd.) Indian Bureau of Mines

84 1,2,4,12 1,2

7 Environmental quality indices (Environmental Impact Assessment)

Faculty Seminar 18-09-2017 Sri J.Harshavardhan Reddy, Assistant Professor, ANITS

91 1,2 1

8 Traffic Signal Design and Marshall Mix Design (Transportation Engineering -I)

Faculty Seminar 22-09-2017 Sri. T. Kiran Kumar, Assistant Professor, ANITS

89 1,2 1

9 Geotechnical Challenges in Marine Environment

Key-note address in One-day workshop on ‘Geotechnical Problems and Practises’

11-10-2017 Sri. A K Mehera, Chief Engineer, Visakhapatnam Port Trust

59 1,2,4,12 1,2

24

S. No


Date-Month-Year


% of Students

Relevance to

POs PSOs

10 Integrated Geotechnical Investigations for Civil Engineering Problems – Some Case studies

Guest Lecture in One-day workshop on ‘Geotechnical Problems and Practises’

11-10-2017 Prof. V Venkateswara Rao (Retd), Andhra University

59 1,2,4,12 1,2

11 Geotechnical Aspects of Design and Construction of Tunnels


11-10-2017 Sri. Rishi Jaiswal, Scientist-D, DRDO, Visakhapatnam

59 1,2,4,12 1,2

12 Case Studies on Bearing Capacity failures


11-10-2017 Prof. C N V Suryanarayana Reddy, Andhra University

59 1,2,4,12 1,2

13 Fly Ash : Solid Waste Management


11-10-2017 Prof. B N D Narasinga Rao, ANITS(A)

59 1,2,4,12 1,2

7 Macro and micro structure of EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment)

Faculty Seminar 12-10-2017 Sri J.Harshavardhan Reddy, Assistant Professor, ANITS

91 1,2 1

14 Air Pollution Sources and Control Options

Guest Lecture 24-10-2017

Ravi Lakshmi Narayana, Environmental Engineer, A.P.Pollution Control Board, Visakhapatnam

100 4,7,11 1,3

15 E-Tabs Software A Two-day workshop on ‘E-Tabs’

13-12-2017 to 14-12-2017

Data Pro, Visakhapatnam 67 2,5,7,12 1,2,3

16 Heirarchy & 5R of SWM (Solid Waste Management)

Faculty Seminar 19-12-2017 Sri. J.Harshavardhana Reddy, Assistant Professor, ANITS

74 1,2 1

25

S. No


Date-Month-Year


% of Students

Relevance to

POs PSOs

17 Methods of Estimating solid waste quantity (Solid Waste Management)

Faculty Seminar 26-12-2017

Sri. J.Harshavardhana Reddy, Assistant Professor, ANITS

74 1,2 1

17 Reclaimed Soils, Land fill gas, Leachate-Landfill liners. (Ground Improvement Techniques)

Faculty Seminar 18-01-2018 Sri. Ch.Vineel, Assistant Professor, ANITS

76 1 1

18 Failure of Prestressed concrete beams (Prestressed Concrete)

Faculty Seminar 14-02-2018 Sri. K.Suryanarayana, Assistant Professor, ANITS

71 1,2 1

19 Industry exposure

Industrial Visit to Water and Sewage Treatment Plants at Narava and Town kotha road, Visakhapatnam

24-02-2018

Sri J. Harshavardhan Reddy, Assistant Professor, ANITS P Vandana Rao, Assistant Professor, ANITS

84 6,7,9,12 2,3

20 Design of pile cap for two piles (Reinforced Concrete Structures - II)

Faculty Seminar 27-02-2018 Sri. J Vikranth, Associate Professor, ANITS

87 1,2 1

21 Breakwater curves (Transportation Engineering - II)

Faculty Seminar 05-03-2018 Sri. T.Kiran Kumar, AssistantProfessor, ANITS

69 1,2 1

22 Methods of Estimating Strength of solid waste (Solid Waste Management)

Faculty Seminar 08-03-2018 Sri. J.Harshavardhana Reddy, Assistant Professor, ANITS

74 1,2 1

17 Geo-referencing (RS & GIS Applications in Civil Engineering)

Faculty Seminar 19-03-2018 Sri. Ch.Srinivas, Assistant Professor, ANITS

93 1,2,5 1,2

23 Whiskbroom and push broom sensors (RS & GIS Applications in Civil Engineering)

Faculty Seminar 21-03-2018 Sri. Ch.Srinivas, Assistant Professor, ANITS

93 1,2,5 1,2

23 Introduction to Photogrammetric Surveying (Surveying - II)

Faculty Seminar 23-03-2018 Sri. T.V.ViswaTeja, Assistant Professor, ANITS

90 1,2, 1,2

24 Traffic Signal Design and Marshall Mix Design (Transportation Engineering - I)

Faculty Seminar 24-03-2018 Sri. T.Kiran Kumar, Assistant Professor, ANITS

96 1,2 1

26

S. No


Date-Month-Year


% of Students

Relevance to

POs PSOs

25 Critical depth for pile foundations (Geotechnical Engineering -II)


93 1,2 1

26 Rheology of Concrete; Deterioration of concrete and its prevention (Concrete Technology)

Faculty Seminar 29-03-2018 Sri. K.Suryanarayana, Assistant Professor, ANITS

97 1,2 1

27 Career Orientation Seminar organized by T&P Cell

28-04-2018 Bharath Paladugu, Director, Himma International Academy

100 1,2 1

27


CAYm2 2016-17

S. No

Gap Action taken Date-Month-Year


% of Students

Relevance to

POs PSOs

1 Planning and Construction of New Capital of Andhra Pradesh

Guest Lecture 09-07-2016 Sri. D K Visweswara Rao Chief Engineer, CRDA, Amaravathi

67 6,7,9,12 2,3

2 Major Irrigation Projects and Interlinking of Rivers

Guest Lecture 15-07-2016

Sri. R Nageswara Rao, Superintending Engineer, Water Resource Circle, Visakhapatnam

84

6,7,9,12 2,3

3 Career Awareness for Engineering Graduates


18-07-2016

Mr Mohamed Abdullah,Director of Conduira Education and Service Ltd

100 1,2 1

4 Speed maths Wide Open workshop on Speed maths (WOWS)

23-07-2016 to 24-07-2016


100 1,2 1



05-08-2016 Sri. M.K.S.S.K. Chaitanya, V Leela Manusha, Sri.Ch Vineel, Assistant Professors, ANITS

60 6,7,9,12 2,3

6 Higher Studies in US (MBA & MS) Seminar organized by T&P Cell

15-09-2016 International Knowledge Center

100 1,2 1

7

Rain water harvesting,Rain gauge stations in and around visakhapatnam (Water Resources Engineering -I)

Faculty Seminar 24-06-2016 Sri. Ch. Vineel, Assistant Professor, ANITS

62 1,2 1



93 1,2 1

9 Estimation of Septic tank (Estimating & Quantity Surveying)


96 1,2 1

28

S. No

Gap Action taken Date-Month-Year


% of Students

Relevance to

POs PSOs

10 Loads on braced members (Steel Structures- I)

Faculty Seminar 20-09-2016 Sri. M K S S K Chaitanya, Assistant Professor, ANITS

93 1,2 1

11 Traffic Signal Design and Mrshall Mix Design Introduction (Transportation Engineering -I)


82 1,2 1

12 Geotechnical Applications in Civil Engineering

ASCE ANITS Students Chapter Inaugural Lecture

01-10-2016 Dr. SivakumarBabu, Professor, Civil Engg,

I.I.Sc., Bangalore 100 1,2 1

13 Introduction to working stress method (Reinforced Concrete Structures - I)


60 1,2 1

14 Gantry girders (Steel Structures – II) Faculty Seminar 17-12-2016 Sri. M.K.S.S.K.Chaitanya, Assistant Professor, ANITS

58 1,2 1

15 Wind load calculations for gable frames (Steel Structures – II)

Faculty Seminar 05-01-2017 Sri. M.K.S.S.K.Chaitanya, Assistant Professor, ANITS

58 1,2 1

16

Bar bending schedule for Reinforcement in Cages of Pile Foundations (Geotechnical Engineering – II)

Faculty Seminar 30-01-2017 Sri. Ch.Vineel, Assistant Professor, ANITS

79 1,2 1

17 Fundamentals of Radiometry (Remote Sensing and Geographical Information Systems)


35 1,2,5 1,2

18 Breakwater Curves (Transportation Engineering – II)


85 1,2 1

19 Design of masonry retaining wall (Reinforced Concrete Structures – II)


86 1,2 1

20 Soil Nailing, Soil Distribution in India (Ground Improvement Techniques)

Faculty Seminar 09-03-2017 Ms. P. Vandana Rao, Assistant Professor, ANITS

80 1,2 1

29

2.2. Teaching-Learning Processes (100)

2.2.1. Describe Processes followed to improve quality of Teaching & Learning (25) (Processes may include adherence to academic calendar and improving instruction methods using pedagogical initiatives such as real world examples, collaborative learning, quality of laboratory experience with regard to conducting experiments, recording observations, analysis of data etc. encouraging bright students, assisting weak students etc. The implementation details and impact analysis need to be documented)

Improvement of quality of Teaching and Learning at ANITS is effected in the following three stages:

I) Stage I: Teaching –Learning Foundation

II) Satge II: Improving Instruction Methods

III) Stage III: Innovative practices adopted by faculty members

The first two stages are explained in this section, while the third section is considered in Sec.5.5 as per the

SAR format.

Stage I: Teaching –Learning Foundation

The scheme of activities/elements adopted at ANITS in stage I: the Teaching Learning Foundation is

illustrated in Fig. B 2.2.1a. It consists of the following activities/elements

1) Budget support

2) Faculty Recruitment

3) Providing Infrastructure

4) Procurement of Quality Equipment / Consumables

5) Academic calendar

6) Subjects allotment

7) Quality lecture notes

8) FDP/Seminar in Teaching Methodology

9) Lesson Plan

10) Instruction Delivery

11) Lecture dairy

12) Continuous Evaluation

13) Review of Syllabus Coverage

14) End Semester Exams

15) Results Analysis

16) Assessment of CO-PO Attainment

17) Action for unattained COs/POs/PSOs

18) Faculty Annual Appraisal

These elements are briefly explained below

1) Budget Support

The resources needed for Teaching-Learning process are met by suitable Budget. Quality

equipment/consumables are procured by the Department through the Department Purchase committee.

Similarly the infrastructure requirements of the Department are also proposed by the Department and

provided by the Principal/Management.

2) Faculty Recruitment

Effective Teaching-Learning process requires qualified and competent faculty members. Advertisement for

Faculty/staff recruitment is published in News Papers in March every year. Eligible and shortlisted

candidates will be called for interview in April. The interview panel consists of University Professor,

30

Member of the Governing body and senior faculty member of the Department apart from the HoD,

Director of Administration, Principal and Secretary/Chairman. Selections are made purely based on merit.

Fig. B 2.2.1a Flow chart showing the Foundational Teaching-Learning at ANITS

31

3) Academic Calendar

The Institute Academic Calendar is circulated to the Departments towards the end of the previous

academic year. The academic calendar is implemented as per schedule with respect to commencement of

class work, Mid-I and Mid-II examinations, Last working day, End semester exams (theory) and End

semester exams (Practical) in each semester/year. In addition, FDPs, students counselling, remedial

classes, guest lectures, workshop/symposia, industrial visits, CRC meetings etc., are also implemented by

the faculty members under the review and guidance of the HoD.

4) Subjects Allotment

The list of electives is circulated to the students towards the end of the previous semester and the

electives for the semester are finalized based on the students option. After finalising the electives, Faculty

members are given choice to give options 1, 2, 3... etc., for subjects allotment. Mostly faculty will be

allotted one subject of their 1st choice. The second subject is also given as per the choice of the faculty,

subject to the needs of the Department.

5) Quality Lecture notes

Faculty members prepare/update lecture notes for allotted subjects by

Consulting various prescribed text books, Question banks of previous examinations, relevant

NPTEL courses and other e-resources from Google.

Participating in various workshops organized within and outside the ANITS campus to enhance the

practical knowledge.

Pursuing Ph.D.

6) FDP/Seminar in Teaching Methodology

Faculty Development program in Teaching methodology is organized in June every year in ANITS for faculty

members having <2 years’ experience. HoD also conducts a seminar on guidelines for effective teaching to

all faculty members at the Department level. This also includes mock classes by the faculty members

7) Lesson Plan

Lesson plans are prepared by faculty members, based on the Academic calendar, syllabus and weekly load,

which is reviewed and approved by HoD.

8) Instruction Delivery

Faculty members take classes as per time table and lesson plan, duly compensating for lost classes due to

leaves, unexpected holidays, and following various teaching-learning techniques, methods etc.

9) Lecture Dairy

The topics covered in each class are recorded in lesson dairy in the subject attendance register. The

attendance registers are reviewed by HoD on a regular basis to monitor the syllabus coverage.

10) Continuous Evaluation

This consists of Mid exams, Assignments, class tests etc., for theory courses and weekly viva voce,

Observation and Record evaluation and internal lab exam for Laboratory courses.

11) Review of Syllabus Coverage

HoD reviews the coverage of syllabus on a regular basis in faculty meetings. Class Review Committee

meetings with regular students of the class along with class faculty is organized before each Mid

Examination.

12) End Semester Exams

These are conducted as per the Academic calendar. End semester practical exams are conducted with one

internal examiner and one external examiner.

32

13) Results Analysis

Analysis of Results is done by faculty coordinator for drafting action for low pass percentage in any course.

14) Assessment of CO-PO Attainment

The procedure for assessment of CO-PO attainment has been evolved over a period of time in the

Department. CO attainment is done by the concerned subject faculty and PO attainment is done the

concerned coordinator(s). Action plan for unattained POs/PSOs is drafted.

15) Faculty Annual Appraisal

Faculty members submit appraisal of their performance annually, in a prescribed format, which is further

reviewed by HoD and Principal for award of Annual increment.

Stage II: Improving Instruction Methods

The scheme of activities in place at ANITS for improving instruction methods are illustrated in Fig. B 2.2.1b

A) Pedagogical Initiatives

The faculty members/Department adopts various methods, techniques and teaching aids for improving

instruction methods, as described below.

1) Use of Teaching-Learning techniques

Revising the topics covered in the previous class through simple questions and answers at the

beginning of each class

Repeating important points in each class

Conducting Tutorial sessions for problematic subjects. Revision of syllabus before examinations

2) Use of e-resources and ICT

Using attractive electronic presentations (PPT) on difficult topics for better understanding. Use of e-learning - resources from National Programme on Technology Enhanced Learning

(NPTEL).

Presenting videos which show the recent technologies in civil engineering.

Example

PPT is incorporated as an item in Course Plan in all subjects wherever relevant

3) Focus on individual students

Identifying uniqueness of each student, understanding the variations among students rather than

lamenting them

Equal attention on the student, his strengths and limitations, along with the subject matter

Effective counselling based on the student’s individual social and financial background.

Motivating students to set multiple career goals to sustain their interest in the learning process.

4) Real world Examples

Exposing students to real world through Examples

Presenting the real life engineering problems through case studies.

Demonstration using Models and charts for better subject understanding.

Providing exposure to real world of Engineering by taking students to on-going construction projects within and outside the campus.

33

Fig. B 2.2.1b Flow chart illustrating the Activities in place at ANITS for improving instruction methods

34

5) Mentoring slow learners

Remedial classes are conducted for late-joining lateral entry students with a separate time table to cover

the syllabus up to their joining time. Remedial classes are also conducted for lateral entry students in

Mathematics, as they are found to be weak in Mathematics.

Class tests are conducted after a unit syllabus is completed and the slow learners are identified. Remedial

classes are conducted for these slow learners before the Mid exams.

6) Encouraging Advanced learners

assigning complex design problems individually to enhance the problem skills of students

Giving assignments to the students on topics beyond curriculum.

7) Guest Lectures

Guest lectures are organized by industry experts which provide industry exposure to the students beyond

the class room learning and curriculum. The details are provided in Sec.2.1.1 and 2.1.2 of the SAR

8) Students Participation in Workshops/symposia

Students are encouraged to participate in workshops and technical symposia organized by various

engineering colleges including IITs. This adds to the knowledge and enhances their knowledge, attitude

and communication skills.

B) Students feedback

Feedback is taken from students on the effectiveness of teaching and subject learning at different points of

time during the semester. Initially, feedback is taken from representative students from each class

informally by HoD after 1-2 weeks of commencement of class work. Feedback is also taken during students

counselling by all faculty members during the same period and communicated to the HoD. If students are

facing difficulty in any subject, the concerned faculty member is informed of the same. Necessary guidance

and support is given by HoD and another senior subject faculty member. This consists of asking the faculty

member to give a mock class before HoD and another senior subject faculty, giving guidelines for

improvement, reviewing the lecture notes and offering necessary support in the subject. After 2-3 weeks,

feedback is again taken from students in the subject for necessary action. In extreme cases, where the

faculty member is unable to improve up to the minimum desired standard, the faculty member is removed

from service with sufficient notice.

Besides the above, on-line students Feedback is taken anonymously twice every semester. The feedback is

summarized and communicated to all faculty members with necessary remarks by the Principal. This

feedback is considered part of Annual Performance Appraisal of the faculty member with a weightage of

25% in Teaching-Learning and Evaluation category.

C) On-line Attendance and Counselling irregular students

The students’ attendance is updated in the Attendance register on a daily basis and is also entered on-line

in Ez-school which for any day will freeze after 48 hours and requires permission from HoD and Principal

for entry after that time.

The students are generally counselled to maintain a minimum attendance of 85%. In the first month of

each semester, the students with attendance<85% are identified and their parents are informed. These

irregular students are counselled and an undertaking is taken from them duly signed by their parents. In

case of students with attendance<65%, the concerned parents are called to the college to meet the

Principal/HoD and sign the undertaking. The class teacher consolidates the action taken and submits a

report to the HoD. The process is continued in case of students who continue to be irregular. This practice

is found to significantly reduce the irregularity of the students.

35

D) Quality of laboratory experience

The quality of laboratory experience to students is improved through the following measures.

1) Experimental setup: student ratio 1:2 is maintained which provides good quality of laboratory

experience.

2) Manuals are provided for all experiments in the laboratories.

3) Viva-voce is conducted before commencement of each lab class

4) Faculty member monitors to see that every student is involved in recording of

readings/observations

5) Calculations and analysis of data as well as practical significance /application of the results

obtained is done by students individually

6) Use of Rubrics for assessment of students in each lab class has been initiated.

2.2.2 Quality of internal semester Question papers, Assignments and Evaluation (20) (Mention the initiatives, implementation details and analysis of learning levels related to quality of semester question papers, assignments and evaluation) 1) Mid exam question paper Setting Question paper for internal semester examination (Mid exam) is set in the standard format by the subject faculty for approximately 50% of the total syllabus. Under Andhra University regulations, the pattern of Mid exam question paper consists of 7 questions out of which the student has to answer any Four Questions. Under Autonomous regulations with effect from the batch admitted in 2015-16, the question paper consists of three units with two questions in each unit. The student has to answer all units with internal choice within the unit. Thus the student has to study complete syllabus for Mid examinations. Each question of the Mid Exam Question papers and Assignments is mapped to the corresponding CO for assessment of COs. The Sample Question paper under AU Regulations are enclosed as Annexure-2. The Sample Question paper under Autonomous Regulations is enclosed as Annexure -3.

2) Question paper validation A three member examination team reviews the Mid exam question paper for validation with respect to COs and Bloom’s taxonomy of learning objectives and the report is subm itted to HoD for further action.

3) Scheme of Valuation for Mid exams The faculty member prepares scheme of valuation for the Mid exam question paper and evaluates the answer scripts as per the scheme. The scheme of valuation and the valued answer scripts are shared with the students for scrutiny. Students affix their signature on the answe r script after scrutiny.

4) Assignments Minimum two Assignments are given in each subject for every semester. The questions framed in the assignments are taken from multiple sources (previous question papers, text books, etc). The assignments are evaluated within two weeks after submission and the valued assignments are returned to the students for their scrutiny and improvement. Mapping is done for all questions of the assignment with the CO’s of the course.

5) Class Test/Seminar/Quiz A class test, seminar or quiz are also part of the internal assessment, one for each semester for improvement of student academics. 2.2.3 Quality of student projects (25) (Quality of the project is measured in terms of consideration to factors including, but not limited to,

environment, safety, ethics, cost, type (application, product, research, review etc.) and standards. Processes

related to project identification, allotment, continuous monitoring, evaluation including demonstration of

working prototypes and enhancing the relevance of projects. Mention Implementation details including

details of POs and PSOs addressed through the projects with justification)

36

The quality of student Project work is enhanced at ANITS by the following process . Under Andhra University regulations, Project work is in IV Year II semester (up to 2017-18) and the Projects allotment is done towards the end of IV year I semester. Under Autonomous regulations, Project work is in IV Year I semester (w.e.f. 2018-19) and the allotment is done in III Year II semester.

1) Course Outcomes for Student Projects

The quality of student projects is ensured and assured through the achievement of the well articulated

Course outcomes, as given in Table B 2.2.3.1. All student project works consider the factors such as

environment, safety, ethics, cost and standards. This is ensured through proper instruction by the Project

guides as well as through Project reviews, where focus is on attainment of COs.

Table B 2.2.3.1

CO

No.

Course Outcomes for student Projects Relevance to POs/PSOs

POs PSOs

1 Student will be able to analyze & design solutions to complex problems by applying fundamentals of sciences and civil engineering.

1, 2, 3 1

2 Student will be able to use modern techniques and tools to design and conduct experiments, prepare and interpret plans and reports with valid conclusions and recommendations.

4, 5, 10 2

3 Student will be able to develop civil engineering solutions based on societal, health, safety, legal, cultural and environmental considerations for sustainable development.

6, 7 3

4 Student will be able to function ethically and effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in multidisciplinary teams and applying management principles and prepare for independent and lifelong learning.

8, 9, 11, 12 -

2) Type of Project (Application, Product, Research, Review)

The students Projects have been classified into the types I) Application, II) Product, III) Research and IV)

Review, as shown in Table B 2.2.3.1

Table B 2.2.3.2

Student Project No

Type of student projects I) Application, II) Product, III) Research and IV) Review

CAY 2018-19 CAYm1 2017-18 CAYm2 2016-17 I I II I II I II I II II III IV

1 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 3 1

2 3 - 2 1 - 3 - 3 - - 2 3 3 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 - - 1

4 2 - 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 - - 1 5 3 1 3 2 - 3 - 3 - - 2 1

6 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 - 2 1 7 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 - 2 1

8 2 - 3 1 - 2 - 2 - 1 3 1

9 3 3 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 3 1 10 3 - 3 2 - 3 - 3 - - 1 1

11 3 - 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 - 2 1 12 1 - 3 1 1 2 1 2 1

13 3 1 3 2 - 3 - 3 - 14 3 - 2 1 1 2 1 2 1

Correlation levels indicated by numbers: 1: Low; 2: medium; 3: High

37

3) Division of students into Project work batches The students are divided into Project work batches by first ranking the students based on their performance in examinations (CGPA/average SGPA/number of backlogs) up to III year II semester/ III Year I Semester. For 12 batches, for example, the top 12 students are nominated as student coordinators for the respective batches. The 13 th ranker is allotted to the 12th batch, 14th ranker to the 11th batch and so on with the 24 th ranker to the 1st batch. The 25th ranker is then allotted to the 1st batch and the cycle is repeated.

4) Project Identification and Allotment The project batches are notified to the students along with the topics offered by the faculty members (anonymously, without guide names). The students are asked to identify topics of their choice and give their options in terms of their order of preference 1, 2, 3 etc.

The project student coordinators are then called for a meeting with HoD and Project faculty Coordinator and another senior faculty member. One student is asked to pick up the batch number (say 6) from a draw of lots with batch numbers. The project coordinator of batch 6, will be awarded the 1st option of the choice of his/her batch. He/she picks up another batch number (say 3) and the 3 rd batch is allotted the topic of 1st option of his/her respective batch. If the 1 st option topic is already allotted, he/she will be allotted the 2nd preferred option and thus the process is completed. The allotted project topics and the corresponding guides are then notified.

After allotment of projects is completed, the respective guide gives option to the s tudents to choose an alternate topic if any.

5) Continuous monitoring and Project reviews The progress of the project work is continuously monitored. Three Project Reviews are conducted to review the quality and progress of the project work. The panel of e xaminers for Project review consists of Project guide, a subject faculty as examiner and HoD. Sample circular for Project review is enclosed in the Annexure-4.

The project review consists of assessment of PPT presentations by the individual students about the work done along with plan of action for the remaining work. Factors including, environment, safety, ethics, cost and applicable standards as well as team work and CO-PO/PSO mapping are duly considered in the assessment. Sample format for Project review assessment is enclosed in the Annexure-5. Suggestions given by the panel or other faculty members are to be incorporated by the students which will be reviewed during the subsequent assessment. The schedule of project reviews and the pro-forma for evaluation are enclosed. The evaluation format and the power point presentation made by students during the review assess both individual and team performance.

End Semester evaluation of Project work is done by a panel consisting of External examiner from Andhra University and HoD along with the Project guide. Suggestions given by the external examiner are incorporated before submission of the final dissertation. The project classification type (application, product, research, or review) for last three years is shown in Table B 2.2.3.1. Rubrics for Project work assessment has been incorporated from this academic year.

6) Project work Publications The details of the papers published from the students Project work are given below.

Papers published from students Project work

CAY (2018-19) 1. Narasinga Rao, B.N.D. and Sai Revathi, A. (2019) “Use of Parawada Fly Ash as a Substitute to Soil

in Embankments and Subgrades”, International Journal of Management Technology and Engineering, ISSN No.: 2249-7455, Volume IX, Issue IV, pp.2130-2136, April 2019, Impact Factor 6.3 (1.Thomson Reuters' Indexed Journal (Research ID : H -2418-2017); 2.Scopus Suggested Journal (ID: 50E4CF07B9164F83); 3. UGC Approved Journal (Serial No. 45550))

2. P Vandana Rao, G Sudheer kumar, (2019),”Analysis of response of square footing on sloping terrain using PLAXIS 2D”, Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative

38

Research (JETIR), ISSN-2349-5162, Vol. 6, Issue 6, pp.710-717, Impact factor 5.87. 3. M. Premchand, B. Appala Naidu, (2019), “2D Flow simulation for the upstream side of nagarjuna

sagar reservoir using hec-ras”, Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), ISSN-2349-5162, Vol. 6, Issue 5, pp.396-399, Impact factor 5.87.

4. Chippada Srinivas, T.Satyavathi, P. Gnana Prakash, (2019),” A study on investigation of micro silica as partial replacement of cement in concrete”, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, ISSN 0973-4562, Vol. 14, No. 9, pp. 2203-2206, Impact factor 2.38.

5. Chippada Srinivas, P. Gnana Prakash, (2019),” Experimental study on compressive strength of concrete by partially replacing cement with micro silica”, International Journal of Management, Technology And Engineering, ISSN NO: 2249-7455, Vol. IX, Issue III, pp. 5313-5319, Impact factor 6.30.

Papers published from students Project work CAYm1 (2017-18)

6. Narasinga Rao, B.N.D. and Somasekhar, A.S. (2018) Geotechnical Properties of Parawada Fly Ash and Thagarapuvalasa soil Mixtures for Use in Highway Embankments, International journal of basic and applied research, Vol. 8, No.6, June 2018, pp.101 -115, www.pragatipublication.com, ISSN 2249-3352 (P) 2278-0505 (E), Cosmos Impact Factor (Germany): 5.86.

7. J.Harsha vardhan reddy, L. Venkata anil, and D.Vinay kumar (2018) "A review on integrated solid waste management in visakhapatnam city", International Journal of advance in management, technology and engineering sciences (IJAMTES),volume 8, issue V, May 2018.

8. M.Premchand, S. Bhavani (2018) Roof top rain water harvesting technique for ANITS campus, International journal of emerging technologies and innovative research ISSN:2349-5162 vol. 5, Issue 5, page number 396-399, May 2018

9. Ch. Vineel, M.Vineeta, S.Sarvani (2018) Strength comparison between normally cured and accelerated cured concrete with partial replacement of sand with pond ash, Journal of emerging technologies and innovative research, JETIR-Volume 5, Issue 9, Pages 143-147, Impact factor-5.87, 2018.

10.P. Vandana Rao, B.Prasanthi (2018) A parametric study on black cotton soil stabilized using rice husk ash, International Journal of Advances in Management, Technology and Engineering Sciences (IJAMTES), Volume 8, Issue 4, April 2018

11.Ch.Srinivas, V. Naveen Kumar (2018) Experimental Study on mechanical properties of concrete by partially replacing cement with GGBS and fine aggregate with copper slag, International journal of Advanced in Management, Technology & Engineering Sciences, April 2018, ISSN 2249-7455, Impact factor 6.3

12.Ch.Srinivas, N. Naveen Kumar, E. Vinod (2018) Experimental study of Copper slag on mechanical properties of concrete, International journal of Applied Engineering Research, April 2018, ISSN 5328-5331

Papers published from students Project work CAYm2 (2016-17)

1. Narasinga Rao, B.N.D., and Anantha Sairam, K. (2017), Use of Parawada Fly Ash in Concrete as Partial Replacement of Cement, International Journal of Engineering Technology Science and Research IJETSR www.ijetsr.com, ISSN 2394 – 3386 Volume 4, Issue 5, May 2017, pp.405-410, Impact Factor 2.12.

2. Ch.Vineel, G.Hemalatha devi (2017). Evaluation of crusher dust as replacement of filler in concrete", IOSR Journal of Civil Engineering, Volume 7, Issue 9, pages 18-21, September 2017, Impact factor-1.68.

39

2.2.4 Initiatives related to industry interaction (15) (Give details of the industry involvement in the program such as industry-attached laboratories, partial

delivery of appropriate courses by industry experts etc. Mention the initiatives, implementation details and

impact analysis)

1) Industry involvement in the program design and Curriculum.

The Board of Studies (Civil) consists of a senior engineer from the Industry and Professors from II T, Madras,

IIT, Bombay and Andhra University. BoS external members lists is enclosed as Annexure-6. In addition,

senior engineers from the industry are also consulted in the design of syllabus.

2) Industry involvement in partial delivery of any regular courses for students

Students have done their Project work in collaboration with some industries, as shown in Table B 2.2.4.2

Table B 2.2.4.2

Project work in collaboration with industries CAY (2018-19)

S. No.

Project title Roll Nos of students

Industry involved

1 A Study on use of Fly ash in Embankments and Sub grades

315126508061,24,34,37,40

HNPC, Visakhapatnam. DSTPP, Nellore. SGPL, Nellore.

2 Laboratory study on chemical composition of fly ash

315126508014,25,38,45,72,

HNPC, Visakhapatnam. DSTPP, Nellore. SGPL, Nellore.

3 Cost economics of reinforced and unreinforced flexible payments over soft soils.

315126508017,21,22,43,52

Megaplast, Mumbai

Table B 2.2.4.2

Project work in collaboration with industries CAYm1 (2017-18)

S. No.

Project title Roll Nos of students Industry involved

1 A Study on High Volume Fly ash Concrete

314126508034,18,17,55, 313126508070

NTPC, Parawada, Dr.NTRTPS, Vijayawada, SGPL, Nellore,

TPCL, Nellore 2 Assessment of Pond Ash for

Sustainable Utilization in Construction Industry

314126508053,38,40,57, 313126508028

NTPC, Parawada

3 A Study on the Use of Fly ash in Geotechnical Engineering Applications

314126508002,22,27,39,62 313126508059,

NTPC, Parawada

Table B 2.2.4.2

Project work in collaboration with industries CAYm2 (2016-17)

S. No.

Project title Roll Nos of students Industry involved

1 Fly ash utilization in concrete and soil stabilization

313126508032,12,15,33,20 NTPC, Parawada

2 Planning of smart cities 313126508009,60,39,24,63 GVMC

40

3) Impact analysis of industry institute interaction and actions taken thereof

Industry institute interaction is effected through

1) Guest lectures by industry experts

2) Membership of industry experts in Department BoS

3) Membership of industry experts in Department Advisory committee

4) Industrial visits by students

5) Student Project works with involvement of industry

4) Industrial internship /summer training of more than two weeks and post training Assessment

Students undergo Industrial training for 4 weeks under the guidance of an engineers from industry and one

faculty member from ANITS, at the end of III year II semester during summer vacation. After the successful

completion of Industrial Training, the students will submit a report which will be evaluated through viva

voce by a Panel of examiners consisting of HOD, Internal guide and a senior faculty member. Circular

showing the schedule of industrial training evaluation and the evaluation format are enclosed in annexure-

7.

5) Impact analysis of industrial training

Practical knowledge of the student in Civil Engineering is improved. This is ascertained based on review of

the industrial training report submitted by the students and also through viva voce examination. The

POs/PSOs attained through industrial training are provided in Table B 2.2.4.5.

41

POs/PSOs attainment from Industrial Training

Table B 2.2.4.5

CO Course Outcome PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3

419.1

Investigate and analyze at least one complex civil engineering problem with substantiated conclusions using first

principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.

2 2

419.2

Select and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools to complex civil engineering

activities with an understanding of the limitations.

2 2 2

419.3

Assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent

responsibilities relevant to one civil engineering problem.

2

419.4

Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in teams as well as to comprehend and write effective

reports and design documentation, make effec tive presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.

2 2 2

419.5

Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and

management principles and apply these to manage at least one civil engineering project, as a member and leader in a team.

2 3

PO/PSO attainment CAY (2018-19) 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

PO/PSO attainment CAYm1 (2017-18) 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

PO/PSO attainment CAYm2 (2016-17) 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

42

2.2.5 Initiatives related to industry internship/summer training (15) (Mention the initiatives, implementation details and impact analysis)

Potential industries for summer training are contacted and students are deputed to various industries for summer training. The details are

provided in Table B 2.2.5.

Table B 2.2.5 Industries where students underwent Industrial Training

CAY 2018-19

S. No.

Company Name Company

Sector Incorporation

Status Discipline Level

Date From

Date To

No. of students

1 Visakhapatnam Port trust Public Central Civil UG 10-05-2019 02-06-2019 4

2 VMRDA Public State Civil UG 01-05-2019 31-05-2019 5

3 Rashtriy Ispat Nigam Limited,Visakhapatnam Steel Plant

Public State Civil UG 29-04-2019 18-05-2019 5

4 Public Health & Engineering Department, Visakhapatnam.


5 Pancahyathi Raj, Srikakulam Public State Civil UG 27-05-2019 18-06-2019 5

6 G.V.M.C Public State Civil UG 01-05-2019 28-05-2019 4

7 IVRCL,Rajahmundry Public State Civil UG 02-05-2019 04-06-2019 5

8 MK BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS Private State Civil UG 06-05-2019 05-06-2019 5

9 Sri Ram Properties,Panorama Hills Private State Civil UG 30-04-2019 28-05-2019 5

10 Rayi Design + Engineer Consultants Private State Civil UG 29-04-2019 29-05-2019 4

11 Sri Sai Builders Private State Civil UG 01-05-2019 29-05-2019 5

12 Cheri Associates Private State Civil UG 25-04-2019 25-05-2019 5

13 Balaji constructions Private State Civil UG 24-04-2019 25-05-2019 5

14 Surya Allied Services Private State Civil UG 22-04-2019 21-05-2019 5

43


CAYm1 2017-18

S. No.




Date From

Date To

No. of students

1 Roads & Buildings Section, Visakhapatnam Public State Civil UG 01-05-2018 28-05-2018 16

2 Visakhapatnam Port trust, Visakhapatnam Public State Civil UG 05-05-2018 25-05-2018 12

3 VUDA, Visakhapatnam Public State Civil UG 30-04-2018 26-05-2018 5

4 G.V.M.C., Visakhapatnam Public State Civil UG 05-05-2018 31-05-2018 5

5 Irrigation department Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam


6 Steel Plant, Visakhapatnam Public State Civil UG 30-04-2018 19-05-2018 5

7 Pancahyath Raj, Bheemili, Visakhapatnam Public State Civil UG 01-05-2018 31-05-2018 5

8 Sai Siva Ganga Architects, Visakhapatnam Private State Civil UG 05-05-2018 31-05-2018 12

9 Visakhi Developers, Visakhapatnam Private State Civil UG 03-05-2018 30-05-2018 5


CAYm2 2016-17

S. No.




Date From

Date To

No. of students

1 RashtriyIspat Nigam Limited,Visakhapatnam Steel Plant Public Central Civil UG 04-05-2017 24-05-2017 18 2 East Coast Railway, Visakhapatnam Public Central Civil UG 04-05-2017 24-05-2017 5

3 Larsen & Toubro Ltd., Visakhapatnam Private State Civil UG 04-05-2017 24-05-2017 5

4 India Bulls Sierra (P) Ltd., Visakhapatnam Private State Civil UG 08-05-2017 20-05-2017 10 5 Venkateswara Asset Management, Visakhapatnam Private State Civil UG 03-05-2017 30-05-2017 5

6 Vijay Prestressed Products, Visakhapatnam Private State Civil UG 04-05-2017 24-05-2017 5 7 Hema Abodes Pvt. Ltd., Visakhapatnam Private State Civil UG 11-05-2017 01-06-2017 6

8 Jana Chaitanya Housing (P) Ltd., Visakhapatnam Private State Civil UG 11-05-2017 01-06-2017 12 9 MVV Builders, Visakhapatnam Private State Civil UG 03-05-2017 30-05-2017 5

44

CRITERION 3 Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes 120

3. COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES (120) 3.1. Establish the correlation between the courses and the Program Outcomes (POs) and Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs) (20) 3.1.1. Course Outcomes (COs) (SAR should include course outcomes of one course from each semester of study, however, should be prepared for all courses and made available as evidence, if asked) (05) Note: Number of Outcomes for a Course is expected to be around 6.

The Course Outcomes of all courses of all semesters for CAY 2018-19, CAYm1 2017-18, and CAYm2 2016-17 have been prepared. The Course Outcomes of one course from each semester of study for

CAY (2018-19) are given in Table B 3.1.1.

Table B 3.1.1 Course Outcomes of one course from each semester CAY 2018-19

CO No. Course Outcome

CIV111 English

CIV111.1 Analyze the structure of the phrases, clauses and sentences

CIV111.2 Apply his enriched vocabulary to give better shape to his communication skills.

CIV111.3 Effectively use different formats of business correspondence.

CIV111.4 Use idiomatic expressions and foreign phrases in his communication.

CIV111.5 Use correct structures to write sentences.

CIV121 Engineering Mathematics-II

CIV121.1 Solve linear system equations using of matrix algebra techniques

CIV121.2 Determine the Eigen values and vectors of a matrix

CIV121.3 Apply different techniques in solving differential equations that model engineering problem

CIV121.4 Use the application of Differential equations like simple electric circuits, Newton’s law of cooling and to solve any higher order linear ordinary differential equation with constant coefficients

CIV121.5 Solve linear differential equations and Network analysis using Laplace transforms

CIV211 Engineering Mathematics-III

CIV211.1 Understand the concepts of Gradient, Divergence and Curl and finding scalar potential function of irrotational vector fields.

CIV211.2 Understand the concepts of Green’s Theorem, Stokes’ Theorem and the Divergence Theorem and to evaluate line integrals, surface, integrals and flux integrals.

CIV211.3 Understand some basic techniques for solving linear partial differential equations and how to identify a partial differential equation in order to determine which technique(s) can best be applied to solve it.

CIV211.4 Understand the methods to solve the Laplace, heat, and wave equations.

CIV211.5 Gain good knowledge in the application of Fourier Transforms.

CIV221 Concrete Technology

45

CO No. Course Outcome

CIV221.1 Understand the composition, manufacturing process and properties of cement.

CIV221.2 Understand the classification, characteristics and properties of aggregate.

CIV221.3 Acquire the skill of testing, supervision of concrete work & interpretation of tests results.

CIV221.4 Understand the behaviour of hardened concrete.

CIV221.5 Understand the need for special concretes.

CIV312 Environmental Engineering-II

CIV312.1 Plan and design the sewerage systems

CIV312.2 Select the appropriate appurtenances in the sewerage systems

CIV312.3 Selection of suitable treatment flow for sewage treatment

CIV312.4 Identify the critical point of pollution in a river for a specific amount of pollutant disposal into the river

CIV321 Reinforced Concrete Structures-II

CIV321.1 Design and draw the reinforcement detailing of staircase.

CIV321.2 Design and draw the reinforcement detailing of cantilever & counterfort retaining walls.

CIV321.3 Design and draw the reinforcement detailing of pile and pile caps

CIV321.4 Understand the basic concepts of pre-stressed concrete, know the different prestressing systems, analyze the prestressed concrete members and evaluate the losses in prestressing.

CIV321.5 Understand the structural drawings for practical execution.

CIV413 Project Planning & Management

CIV413.1 Prepare the schedule of actives in a construction project

CIV413.2 Estimate project completion time using different techniques namely CPM and PERT

CIV413.3 Prepare tender quotation for a construction project

CIV423 Engineering Economics & Finance

CIV423.1 Understand the economic environment and to give an idea on various concepts of Engineering economics.

CIV423.2 Gain knowledge about the concepts of cost estimating and financial management.

46

3.1.2. CO-PO/PSO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1 (six matrices to be mentioned; one per semester from 3rd to 8th semester) (05)

Table B 3.1.2 CO-PO/PSO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1

CAY 2018-19

CO PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3

CIV111 English

CIV111.1

2

3

3

2 3

CIV111.2

3

3

CIV111.3

3

3

CIV111.4

3

3

CIV111.5

3

3 2 2

3

CIV111 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00

CIV121 Engineering Mathematics-II

CIV121.1 3 2

1

3 1

CIV121.2 3 2

1

3 1

CIV121.3 3 2

1

3 1

CIV121.4 3 2

1

3 1

CIV121.5 3 2

1

3 1

CIV121 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00

CIV211 Engineering Mathematics-III

CIV211.1 3 3 3 3

2 1 3 3

CIV211.2 3 2 2 2

3 2

CIV211.3

2 2 3

3 1 2 3

CIV211.4

3 2

3

3

CIV211.5

3 2

3

3

CIV211 3.00 2.60 2.20 2.67 2.75 1.00 2.80 2.67


CIV221.1 2 3 2 3 3

2

1 3 3 2

CIV221.2 2 2 2 2 3

2 3

CIV221.3

2 2 3 2

3

1 2 3 3

CIV221.4

3 2

2

3

3 2 3

CIV221.5

2 2 3 2

3

1 2 3 3

CIV221 2.00 2.40 2.00 2.75 2.40 2.75 1.00 2.40 2.80 2.75

CIV312 Environmental Engineering-II

47

CO PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3

CIV312.1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

1 3 3 3

CIV312.2 3 2 2 2 3

3 3 3

CIV312.3

2 2 3 2 3 3

1 2 3 3

CIV312.4

3 2

2 3 3 2

3 2 3

CIV312 3.00 2.50 2.25 2.67 2.50 3.00 3.00 2.50 1.00 2.75 2.75 3.00

CIV321 Reinforced Concrete Structures-II

CIV321.1 2 3 1

2

2 2

2

CIV321.2 2 3 1

2

2 2

2

CIV321.3 2 3 1

2

2 2

2

CIV321.4 2 3 1

2

2 2

1

CIV321.5 2 3 1

1

2 2

3

CIV321 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.80 2.00 2.00 2.00

CIV413 Project Planning & Management

CIV413.1 3 3 2 2 1

2 2 3 2 2 1

CIV413.2 3 3 2 2 3

2 2 3 3 1 3 1

CIV413.3 3 3 2 2 1 2

2 2 2 3 2 1 2 2

CIV413 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.75 1.75 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.75 2.75 2.25 1.50 1.75 1.67

CIV423 Engineering Economics & Finance

CIV423.1 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2

CIV423.2 1 1 3 2 2 2 3 2 1 3 2

CIV423 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.50 2.50 2.00 1.50 2.50 2.00

Note: Correlation levels 1, 2 or 3 are as defined below: 1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High); “-”: No correlation

48

3.1.3 Program level Course-PO/PSO matrix of all courses INCLUDING first year courses (10)

TABLE 3.1.3 Course – PO/PSO Correlation Matrix

CAY 2018-19

Note: Correlation levels 1, 2 or 3 are as defined below:

1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High); “-”: No correlation

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3

CIV111 English 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00

CIV112 Engineering Mathematics – I 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00

CIV113 Engineering Physics 3.00 2.67 2.33 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.75 1.00

CIV114 Engineering Drawing 2.20 1.40 3.00 2.20 3.00 2.40 3.00

CIV115 Environmental Sciences 2.50 1.50 2.67 2.33 2.75 3.00 2.00 2.50 2.33 3.00

CIV116 Engineering Physics Lab 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.00

CIV117 Programming With C Lab 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00

CIV118 Workshop 1.33 1.00 1.33 1.00

CIV121 Engineering Mathematics-II 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00

CIV122 Engineering Chemistry 2.83 2.33 1.33 1.67 1.83 2.83 1.67 1.83

CIV123 Professional Ethics And Human Values 1.25 1.50 1.60 1.60 2.40 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.80

CIV124 Mathematics For Civil Engineers 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00

CIV125 Civil Engineering Materials 1.60 1.00 1.25 1.00 1.50 1.25 1.20 1.60 1.25 1.50

CIV126 Engineering Chemistry Lab 1.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.33

49

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3

CIV127 Language Lab 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 3.00

CIV211 Engineering Mathematics-III 3.00 2.60 2.20 2.67 2.75 1.00 2.80 2.67

CIV212 Building Technology 3.00 2.33 2.17 3.00 3.00 2.50 2.75 1.00 2.67 3.00

CIV213 Engineering Geology 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.50 1.80 1.80 1.00 1.40 1.60 2.00 2.00

CIV214 Engineering Mechanics 3.00 2.80 1.75 1.60 1.00 2.80 1.60

CIV215 Surveying– I 2.80 2.60 1.50 2.40 1.00 1.80 1.80 1.00 1.80 2.60 2.40

CIV216 Strength of Materials 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.40 1.40 3.00 2.40

CIV217 Surveying Field Work-I 3.00 2.40 1.50 1.67 2.00 1.60 1.80 1.33 2.60 2.00

CIV218 Strength of Materials Lab 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00

CIV221 Concrete Technology 2.00 2.40 2.00 2.75 2.40 2.75 1.00 2.40 2.80 2.75

CIV222 Environmental Engineering-I 3.00 2.75 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.75 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00

CIV223 Fluid Mechanics-I 1.83 2.17 1.50 1.75 1.83 2.17 1.75

CIV224 Surveying – II 3.00 3.00 1.50 1.00 2.60 1.20 3.00 2.40

CIV225 Structural Analysis – I 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.33 1.33 3.00 2.33

CIV226 Building Planning & Drawing 2.00 2.67 1.67 2.50 3.00 2.83 2.67 2.67 3.00 2.33 2.17 2.83

CIV227 Concrete Technology Lab 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50

CIV228 Fluid Mechanics Lab-I 1.50 1.00 1.00 2.50 2.50 1.00 1.00 1.50 2.50

CIV229 Surveying Field Work –II 3.00 2.33 1.33 2.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 2.33 2.00

50

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3

CIV312 Environmental Engineering-II 3.00 2.50 2.25 2.67 2.50 3.00 3.00 2.50 1.00 2.75 2.75 3.00

CIV313 Reinforced Concrete Structures-I 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.80 2.00 2.00 1.80

CIV314 Structural Analysis – II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 3.00

CIV315 Fluid Mechanics-II 1.33 2.00 2.50 1.25 1.33 1.00 2.00 1.25

CIV316 Geotechnical Engineering – I 1.33 2.00 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.00 1.67 1.00 1.50

CIV317 Geotechnical Engineering Lab-I 2.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 1.50 1.50 2.50 2.50 2.00 2.50 2.50

CIV318 Environmental Engineering Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.50 3.00

CIV319 Fluid Mechanics Lab-II 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00

CIV3110 Quantitative & Verbal Aptitude -I 1.88 1.83 1.63 2.25 2.13 2.25

CIV3111 Technical Seminar 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.20

CIV321 Reinforced Concrete Structures-II 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.80 2.00 2.00 2.00

CIV322 Estimation & Costing 1.67 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.00 1.33 2.00 2.00

CIV323 Geotechnical Engineering – II 2.67 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.33 2.67 2.00 2.00

CIV324 Transportation Engineering-I 3.00 2.80 2.80 2.00 1.50 1.33 2.20 3.00 2.00 1.75

CIV325 Water Resources Engineering – I 2.40 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.40 1.33 1.00 2.60 1.75 1.80

CIV327 Geotechnical Engineering Lab-II 3.00 2.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 2.50

CIV328 Computer Applications in Civil Engineering Lab-I

2.33 2.33 2.33 2.00 2.33 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.33 2.33

CIV329 Quantitative & Verbal Aptitude –II 2.33 1.33 2.63 2.63 2.00 2.63

51

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3

CIV3210 Soft Skills Lab 2.50 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.20 2.80

CIV411 Open Elective-I (Nano Technology) 3.00 1.80 1.67 1.67 1.75 2.00 1.50 1.20

2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00

CIV412 Professional Elective - II (Air Pollution & control)

2.75 3.00 2.25 1.50 2.25 2.00 3.00 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.50 2.50 2.00

CIV413 Project Planning & Management 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.75 1.75 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.75 2.75 2.25 1.50 1.75 1.67

CIV414 Steel Structures 2.75 3.00 2.33 2.33 1.33 1.67 1.00 2.00 1.50 2.25 2.00 2.75 2.00 1.00

CIV415 Water Resources Engineering - II 2.40 2.00 1.75 2.50 1.00 1.40 1.50 2.75 1.33 1.33 1.20 2.40 1.75 1.60

CIV416 Transportation Engineering-II 3.00 1.80 1.60 1.60 1.33 1.40 3.00 2.00 3

CIV417 Computer Applications in Civil Engineering Lab-II

1.75 1.75 2.25 1.50 2.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.25 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 1.00

CIV418 Transportation Engineering Lab 3.00 1.00 1.50 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.33 2.00 2.67

CIV419 Project work-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

CIV4110 Industrial Training 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50

CIV 421 Professional Elective – III (Ground Improvement Techniques)

3.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.80 2.20 2.20 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.80 3.00

CIV423 Engineering Economics & Finance 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.50 2.50 2.00 1.50 2.50 2.00

CIV424 Irrigation Structures Design & Drawing 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00

CIV426 Project Work - II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

52

TABLE 3.1.3 Course – PO/PSO Correlation Matrix

CAYm1 2017-18


Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3

CIV111 English 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00







CIV118 Workshop 1.33 1.00 1.33 1.00







CIV127 Language Lab 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 3.00

53

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3





CIV215 Surveying– I 2.80 2.60 1.50 2.40 1.00 1.80 1.80 1.00 1.80 2.60 2.40







CIV224 Surveying – II 3.00 3.00 1.50 1.00 2.60 1.20 3.00 2.40







54

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3















CIV 326(D) RS & GIS applications in Civil Engineering

2.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.33 1.67 1.33 2.00 1.33 1.33 2.00 2.33 2.00



2.33 2.33 2.33 2.00 2.33 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.33 2.33

55

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3



CIV411 Water Resources Engineering-I 2.33 2.17 1.60 1.75 1.33 1.25 1.00 2.50 1.60 1.67


CIV413 Project Planning and Management 1.80 1.80 1.50 2.50 1.83 2.50 1.00 1.80 2.00 1.83


CIV415(A) Environmental Impact Assessment 3.00 2.50 2.67 2.33 2.67 2.67 2.50 1.50 3.00 2.00 3.00

CIV416 Computer Applications in Civil Engineering 1.75 1.75 2.25 1.50 2.67 2.00 2.25 2.00 2.25 2.25


CIV418 Fluid Mechanics Lab-II 2.33 1.83 1.67 1.00 1.80 2.33 1.80 2.33 1.00 1.67 1.00 2.50 1.80 2.50


CIV421 Transportation Engineering-II 3.00 2.17 1.17 1.60 1.00 1.50 1.00 2.17 1.60 1.80

CIV422 Water Resources Engineering-II 1.83 1.33 1.25 1.50 1.50 1.00 2.33 1.00 1.83 2.17 1.67

CIV423(B) Solid Waste Management 2.50 2.67 2.33 2.00 2.50 3.00 2.25 2.00 1.67 2.75 2.33 2.75

CIV424(B) Ground Improvement Techniques 1.00 1.50 1.83 1.83 1.80 1.67 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.83

CIV424(C) Prestressed Concrete 3.00 1.00 1.50 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.25

CIV425 Project Work 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

56

TABLE 3.1.3 COURSE – PO/PSO CORRELATION MATRIX

CAYm2 2016-17


Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3

CIV111 English 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00







CIV118 Workshop 1.33 1.00 1.33 1.00







CIV127 Language Lab 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 3.00

57

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3





CIV215 Surveying– I 2.80 2.60 1.50 1.00 2.40 1.00 1.80 1.80 1.00 1.80 2.60 2.00







CIV224 Surveying – II 3.00 3.00 1.50 1.00 2.60 1.20 3.00 2.40


CIV226 Building Planning & Drawing 2.00 2.67 1.67 2.50 3.00 2.83 2.67 2.67

3.00 2.33 2.17




CIV311 Reinforced Concrete Structures-I 2.00 2.50 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.20 2.00 1.20 2.67 2.00 2.17

58

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3

CIV312 Steel Structures-I 3.00 2.17 2.50 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.25

CIV313 Fluid Mechanics-II 1.83 1.50 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.17 1.83

CIV314 Geotechnical Engineering-I 2.50 2.60 2.50 2.40 3.00 1.75 1.00 2.83 2.60 2.00


CIV316 Estimation and Quantity Surveying 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33



CIV319 Soft skills Lab 2.50 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.20 2.80

CIV321 Structural Analysis-III 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.00 1.33 3.00 2.33 1.00

CIV322 Reinforced Concrete Structures-II 2.00 2.67 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.17 2.00 1.00 2.83 2.00 2.17

CIV323 Steel Structures-II 3.00 2.17 1.67 1.40 1.00 2.67 1.67

CIV324 Geotechnical Engineering-II 2.80 3.00 2.83 2.60 1.75 2.25 1.25 3.00 2.20 2.25

CIV325 Fluid Mechanics-III 1.60 1.80 2.33 1.83 1.00 1.67 1.50 2.17 1.67

CIV 326(A) Repair and Rehabilitation of structures

3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 3.00

CIV 326(B) Remote Sensing and Geographical Information Systems

2.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.33 1.67 1.33 2.00 1.33 1.33 2.00 2.33 2.00


CIV328 Concrete Lab 1.17 1.17 1.17 2.00 1.67 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 2.00

59

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3





CIV415 Computer Applications in Civil Engineering

1.75 1.75 2.25 1.50 2.67 2.00 2.25 2.00 2.25 2.25

CIV416(C) Elements of Solid Waste Management 2.50 2.67 2.33 2.00 2.50 3.00 2.25 2.00 1.67 2.75 2.33 2.75






CIV423(C) Air Pollution Control 2.60 2.20 2.20 2.20 1.80 2.00 2.60 2.60 3.00 2.40 2.00 2.20

CIV423(D) Ground Improvement Techniques 1.00 1.50 1.83 1.83 1.80 1.67 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.33

CIV424 Irrigation Structures-Design & Drawing 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.17

CIV425 Project Work 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

60

3.2. Attainment of Course Outcomes (50)

3.2.1. Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of Course Outcome is based (10) (Examples of data collection processes may include, but are not limited to, specific exam/tutorial questions, assignments, laboratory tests, project evaluation, student portfolios (A portfolio is a collection of artifacts that demonstrate skills, personal characteristics and accomplishments created by the student during study period), internally developed assessment exams, project presentations, oral exams etc.)

ANITS was accorded UGC Autonomous status in 2015 and hence the Autonomous Acade mic regulations R15 are followed for students admitted in 2015-16 and later. For students admitted prior to 2015-16, Andhra university academic regulations are followed.

ASSESSMENT OF COURSE OUTCOMES UNDER AUTONOMOUS REGULATIONS R15

Tools for Course Outcome assessment The various assessment tools evaluate student’s knowledge and ability to apply their knowledge and skills in continuous assessments like Mid examinations, Assignments, Class test, Seminar/quiz, end semester examinations, Project work seminars, industrial training viva-voce or laboratory course internal and end semester examinations and viva-voce, etc. These tools are the evidence of student learning.

Assessment of Course Outcomes is based upon the performance in each semester in (a) Internal Evaluation (IE) (b) End Semester Examination (ESE)

For students admitted into I Year in the Academic year 2015-16 and later (Autonomous Regulations R15), Total Internal assessment is for 40 marks for theory courses (20 for mid exams, 10 for assignments, 5 for class test/quiz/seminar and 5 for class work attendance) and end semester exam is for 60 marks.

There are two mid exams per semester each conducted for 40 marks and reduced to 20 marks and average of these mid marks is taken for final evaluation. Two assignments are conducted and the average for 10 marks is taken. One class test/quiz/seminar is conducted and reduced for 5 marks. For Class work attendance, 5 marks are given if the attendance is ≥95%; 4 marks for ≥90%; 3 marks for ≥85%; 2 marks for ≥80% and 1 mark for ≥75% attendance.

In case of laboratory courses, the internal assessment is for 50 marks and end semester exam for 50 marks. The internal Evaluation consists of 15 marks for observation, 10 marks for Record, 10 marks for internal exam, 10 marks for viva voce and 5 marks for class work attendance. The observations including weekly viva voce (15 marks) and record marks (10 marks) are evaluated continuously for each experiment/exercise and the average marks for all experiments/exercises are considered for final evaluation.

Assessment of COs in Internal Evaluation (IE)

Mapping of COs The questions for mid exams are mapped with relevant COs. As an example, if Q.1a addresses CO1, CO2 and Q.1b addresses CO3, the distribution of marks is 25% for CO1, 25% for CO2 and 50% for CO3. In this way, the maximum marks as well as marks secured for each question by all students is distributed among the relevant COs. Assignments, class test and class work attendance address all COs and the marks are uniformly distributed among all COs.

Assessment of COs attainment In this way, the maximum marks and the marks secured by each student for each CO is evaluated in an Excel spread sheet for each course by the concerned faculty member. Faculty members are trained for conducting assessment of CO attainment. The work is reviewed by two CO assessment coordinators as well as by HoD. The percentage of marks secured by each student in each CO is evaluated.

61

Assessment of COs in End Semester Examination (ESE) A double valuation procedure is adopted in the ESE. Valuation I by the internal examiner and Valuation II by the external examiner are carried out anonymously, based on the scheme of valuation prepared by the Internal examiner, who is the faculty member of the concerned subject. The average of the marks secured in the two valuations is considered. If the marks secured for any student(s) in any course differ by more than 20% between the two valuations, the script(s) are subjected to III valuation. In this case, the average of III valuation marks and the marks of I or II valuation, whichever is closer to III valuation marks is taken for final evaluation.

The mapping of COs for each question, the evaluation of maximum marks and the marks secured by each student in each CO are evaluated in a similar manner as in internal evaluation, except that the weighted average marks of I and II valuations (and III in case of III valuation) are considered for each question. The assessment of COs attainment is done in an Excel Spread sheet for each course by the concerned faculty member. ASSESSMENT OF COURSE OUTCOMES UNDER ANDHRA UNIVERSITY REGULATIONS R07/R14

Assessment tools For students admitted into I Year prior to Academic year 2015-16, the Total Internal assessment is for 30 marks for theory courses (15 for mid exams and 10 for assignments and 5 for class work attendance) and end semester exam is for 70 marks. There are two mid exams per semester each conducted for 30 marks and reduced to 15 marks and average of these mid marks is taken for final evaluation. Two assignments are conducted and the average for 10 marks is taken. For Class work attendance, 5 marks are given if the attendance is ≥95%; 4 marks for ≥90%; 3 marks for ≥85%; 2 marks for ≥80% and 1 mark for ≥75% attendance.

In case of laboratory courses, the internal assessment is for 50 marks and end semester exam for 50 marks. The internal evaluation and End semester Exam and the assessment of COs is done in the same way as in Autonomous Regulations R15.

Andhra University does not declare marks secured by students in End Semester exam but gives the grade secured by students in each course combining the internal marks sent by ANITS and the marks secured by students in End Semester exam. The marks secured by students in End semester exam are therefore not available. Hence the assessment of COs is done based on the grades (which includes both internal and external exam marks in the ratio 30:70) secured by students based on the equivalent marks corresponding to each grade into as per University norms (see Table below).

Grade O A B C D E F

Grade points 10 9 8 7 6 5 <4

Equivalent marks 100 90 80 70 60 50 -

The question-wise marks/grades are also not available in the results declared by Andhra University. Hence assessment (ESE) is done for the entire course using the following procedure. The attainment level for the course is considered equivalent to the attainment levels of all COs for the course.

For each course, the number of students who scored grade D (GP=60% marks) or higher is noted as N60

The percentage of students in the class who score at least 60 percent marks in the course is then calculated using the following equation

1006060

N

Np

Where N= Number of students who appeared in the examination for that course

Assessment of COs in Internal Evaluation (IE) The CO attainment based on internal evaluation is analyzed for feedback and improvement. The

62

procedure adopted is similar to that in Autonomous Regulations except for two differences.

Mapping of COs The questions for mid exams are mapped with relevant COs. As an example, if Q.1a addresses CO1, CO2 and Q.1b addresses CO3, the distribution of marks is 25% for CO1, 25% for CO2 and 50% for CO3. In this way, the maximum marks as well as marks secured for each question by all students is distributed among the relevant COs. Assignments and class work attendance address all COs and the marks are uniformly distributed among all COs.

Assessment of COs attainment In this way, the maximum marks and the marks secured by each student for each CO is evaluated in an Excel spread sheet for each course by the concerned faculty member. The percentage of marks secured by each student in each CO is evaluated.

3.2.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses with respect to set attainment levels (40) Program shall have set Course Outcome attainment levels for all courses. (The attainment levels shall be set considering average performance levels in the university examination or any higher value set as target for the assessment years. Attainment level is to be measured in terms of student performance in internal assessments with respect to the Course Outcomes of a course in addition to the performance in the University examination)

The attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses is recorded with respect to the Set attainment levels as given below. Sample record for CAYm1 2017-18 is also given below.

SET ATTAINMENT LEVELS FOR COs UNDER AUTONOMOUS REGULATIONS R15

Set Attainment Levels for COs in Internal Evaluation (IE) The attainment of each CO in IE is evaluated using the following Set Course Outcome attainment levels

1) If <50% students of the class secure at least 60% marks in the CO, the attainment level is 0 2) If 50% or more students of the class secure at least 60% marks in the CO, the attainment level is 1 3) If 60% or more students of the class secure at least 60% marks in the CO, the attainment level is 2 4) If 70% or more students of the class secure at least 60% marks in the CO, the attainment level is 3

Set Attainment Levels for COs in End Semester Examination (ESE) The attainment level in ESE in each CO is evaluated using the following Set Course Outcome attainment levels


The overall attainment level in each CO is evaluated by giving 60% weightage for End semester examination and 40% weightage for internal evaluation.

63

Example The example for assessment of CO attainment for a course in IE and ESE is illustrated in Table below.

Course: Surveying-II, II Year II Semester, Year: 2017-18 Faculty: T.V.V.Teja

Course Outcome 224.1 224.2 224.3 224.4 224.5

% students of class having at least 60% marks (IE)

87.9 56.1 86.4 78.8 50.0

CO Attainment level (IE) 3 0 2 2 2

% students of class having at least 60% marks (ESE)

87.9 51.5 51.5 51.5 57.6

CO Attainment level (ESE) 3 1 1 1 1

CO Attainment level (Overall)

3 0.6 (0.4x2)+(0.6x1)

=1.4

(0.4x2)+(0.6x1)

=1.4

(0.4x2)+(0.6x1)

=1.4

SET ATTAINMENT LEVELS FOR COs UNDER ANDHRA UNIVERSITY REGULATIONS R07/R14 The attainment level in each Course is evaluated using the following Set Course Outcome attainment levels

1) If <50% students of the class secure at least 60% marks (Grade D or higher Grade) in the Course, the attainment level is 0

2) If 50% or more students of the class secure at least 60% marks (Grade D or higher Grade) in the Course, the attainment level is 1



It may be noted here once again that the Grades awarded by Andhra University in each course include both Sessional marks (30% weightage) and marks scored in ESE (70% weightage). The marks secured in ESE are not communicated by the University. Hence, the attainment level as evaluated above reflects overall attainment in the course for each CO.

Set Attainment Levels for COs in Internal Evaluation (IE) The CO attainment based on internal evaluation is analyzed for feedback and improvement. The procedure adopted is similar to that in Autonomous Regulations except for two differences.

Assessment of COs attainment The attainment of each CO is evaluated using the following Set Course Outcome attainment levels


The CO attainment levels evaluated for IE of all courses (R15/R14/R07 Regulations) for all academic years are compiled in Table B 3.2.2a. The CO attainment levels evaluated for ESE (R15 Regulations) for all academic years are compiled in Table B 3.2.2b.

The overall CO attainment levels evaluated for all academic years (R15/R14/R07 Regulations) are compiled in Table B 3.2.2c. From this data, the Course attainment level for each course is determined by taking the average of the attainment levels of the COs for that course.

The Record of attainment of COs with respect to the set attainment levels for CAY (2018-19) is given in Annexure-8.

64

3.3. Attainment of Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes (50) 3.3.1. Describe assessment tools and processes used for measuring the attainment of each of the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes (10) (Describe the assessment tools and processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of each of the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes is based indicating the frequency with which these processes are carried out. Describe the assessment processes that demonstrate the degree to which the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes are attained and document the attainment levels)

Following are the assessment tools used for measuring the attainment of POs and PSOs;

1) Direct Assessment Direct attainment level of a PO / PSO is determined by the following procedure

1) For a given PO (say PO1), Calculate the attainment level for each course, considering the COs which map with this PO.

2) For example, consider PO1 and Course CIV211, the attainment levels of the COs for this course and the correlation levels with PO1 are shown below

Course CIV211, Engineering Mathematics-II in II Year II Semester CAYm1 2017-18

CO Attainment level

Correlation level with PO1

CIV211.1 3 3 CIV211.2 3 3

CIV211.3 3 0

CIV211.4 3 0

CIV211.5 2 0

3) To determine the Attainment level for PO1 from this course, the CO attainment level for each CO is multiplied with the corresponding Correlation levels. Their sum is then divided with the the sum of the correlation levels. Only the COs (CIV211.1, CIV211.2) which correlate with the PO (PO1) are considered in the calculation. Hence attainment level for PO1, for this Course is obtained as

4) The attainment levels for PO1, is determined for all other courses in a similar manner. The results are shown in Table B 3.3.2 for three Academic years.

5) The average of the attainment levels from all courses obtained in Step3 is then determined for the PO, considering the courses which correlate to the PO.

6) Similarly, the attainment levels for all POs/PSOs are determined following steps and the results are shown in Table B 3.3.1a.

2) Indirect Assessment Indirect assessment of POs & PSOs is evaluated by the following assessment tools: exit survey (40%); Feedback from parents (10%); Feedback from Recruiters/Employers (20%); Co-curricular and Extra-curricular activities (20%); Percentage of students placed or pursuing higher studies or entrepreneurship (10%).

Assessment of Indirect attainment of POs and PSOs is carried out with the following tools

1) Exit Surveys from the out-going final year students (40%)

2) Feedback from parents (10%)

3) Feedback from Recruiters/Employers (20%)

4) Participation and Achievements of students in Co-curricular/Extra-curricular activities (20%)

5) Placements, Higher studies and entrepreneurship (10%)

65

The weightages allocated for the assessment tools are indicated within parentheses against the respective

tool.

1) Exit Survey from the out-going final year students (40%)

Exit surveys are conducted annually from the IV Year II Semester students towards the end of class work.

The Survey form used in exit surveys is enclosed in Annexure-9. Exit survey forms are distributed to the

students in the class and the students are asked to give their feedback anonymously. There is no

compulsion for students to write their name and Register number on the filled-in form. While written

survey forms were used in the year 2015-16, on-line feedback was taken w.e.f. the year 2016-17.

The feedback points in exit survey are the POs and PSOs of the program. Students give rating of 1 (High), 2

(Moderate) or 3 (Low) to indicate the attainment of POs/PSOs. The sample size for exit surveys is generally

about 90% of the class strength. The attainment level from exit surveys is then calculated as

123

123 123

NNN

NNNlevelAttainment

2) Feedback from parents (10%)

Feedback from the parents is collected during their visit to the Department as per the feedback form

shown in Annexure-10. The feedback form contains questions which indirectly reflect some of the

POs/PSOs. The attainment level for each PO/PSO, mapping with the feedback points, is calculated as

follows:

123

123 123

NNN

NNNlevelAttainment

3) Feedback from Recruiters/Employers (20%)

Feedback is taken Recruiters during campus placements which is analysed. Sample Recruiter’s feedback

form is enclosed in Annexure-11. Recruiters feedback is on 5 point scale and the attainment level is

calculated as follows:

12345

12345 12345

NNNNN

NNNNNlevelAttainment

4) Participation and Achievements of students in Co-curricular/Extra-curricular activities (20%)

Indirect assessment of PO/PSO attainment is also made by considering the number of students

participating in co-curricular /extra-curricular activities both within and outside the campus as well as the

achievements in terms of prizes won by the students.

Assessment of PO/PSO attainment The attainment of PO/PSO is evaluated using the following Set PO/PSO attainment levels

1) If <15% students participate in Co-curricular/Extra-curricular activities, the attainment level is 0 2) If 15% or more students participate in Co-curricular/Extra-curricular activities, the attainment level is

1 3) If 30% or more students participate in Co-curricular/Extra-curricular activities, the attainment level is

2 4) If 40% or more students participate in Co-curricular/Extra-curricular activities, the attainment level is

3

66

5) Placements, Higher studies and entrepreneurship (10%)

The number of placements secured by the students, number of students qualifying in GATE/PGCET/GRE

etc and number of students securing admissions in higher learning institutes for M.Tech./MS including

entrepreneurship indirectly reflect the PO/PSO attainment.

Assessment of PO/PSO attainment The attainment of PO/PSO is evaluated using the following Set PO/PSO attainment levels

1) If <40% students are placed through recruitment/ higher studies /entrepreneurship, the attainment level is 0

2) If 40% or more students are placed through recruitment/ higher studies /entrepreneurship, the attainment level is 1



The total indirect attainment of each PO/PSO is determined by adding the attainment through the five

components according to their respective weightages.

Overall/Combined PO/PSO attainment

The overall attainment for each PO/PSO is determined by adding the respective attainment from direct

and indirect attainment in the ratio 80%:20%.

67

3.3.2. Provide results of evaluation of each PO & PSO (40) Program shall set Program Outcome attainment levels for all POs & PSOs. (The attainment levels by direct (student performance) and indirect (surveys) are to be presented through Program level Course – PO & PSO matrix as indicated).

Table 3.3.2 PO/PSO Attainment Levels for each Course

CAY 2018-19

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3

CIV111 English 1.60 1.60 1.62 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.62


CIV113 Engineering Physics 1.08 1.08 0.93 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.21 1.30 1.30 0.80 0.87 0.80





CIV118 Workshop 2.80 2.60 2.80 2.60







CIV127 Language Lab 2.00 1.80 1.80 1.80 2.00 1.80





CIV215 Surveying– I 1.43 1.38 1.87 1.35 1.10 1.33 1.44 1.40 1.36 1.38 1.35



68

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3





CIV224 Surveying – II 1.32 1.32 0.90 0.90 1.37 1.33 1.32 1.42










CIV316 Geotechnical Engineering – I 2.04 2.13 1.80 2.10 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.10








CIV323 Geotechnical Engineering – II 2.20 2.27 2.20 3.00 2.76 2.54 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.76 2.54





3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

69

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3



CIV411 Open Elective-I (Nano Technology) 2.88 2.93 3.00 2.88 2.83 3.00 3.00 2.90 2.88 2.70 2.88 2.88 2.85 3.00

CIV412 Professional Elective - II (Air Pollution & control)

2.84 2.85 2.87 2.80 2.87 2.85 2.85 2.88 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.88 2.82 2.93

CIV413 Project Planning & Management 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.04 3.00 3.00 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.14 2.10 2.20 2.60

CIV414 Steel Structures 1.42 1.10 1.11 1.11 1.20 1.32 1.10 1.13 1.50 1.49 2.20 1.42 1.47 1.10

CIV415 Water Resources Engineering - II 1.32 1.36 1.26 1.38 1.35 1.31 1.40 1.38 1.45 1.40 1.30 1.35 1.37 1.38

CIV416 Transportation Engineering-II 2.60 2.62 2.68 2.60 2.45 2.57 2.60 2.60 2.6

CIV417 Computer Applications in Civil Engineering Lab-II

3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00


CIV419 Project work-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00


CIV 421(D) Professional Elective – III (Ground Improvement Techniques)

2.16 2.16 2.16 2.16 2.10 2.18 2.18 2.16 2.16 2.10 2.16 2.16 2.16 2.10 2.16

CIV423 Engineering Economics & Finance 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

CIV424 Irrigation Structures Design & Drawing 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

CIV426 Project Work - II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

Direct Attainment 2.04 1.98 2.05 2.07 2.11 2.24 2.03 2.24 2.48 2.32 2.18 1.97 1.99 2.02 2.13

Indirect Attainment 2.09 2.18 1.97 1.97 2.04 2.37 2.24 2.16 2.44 2.12 2.00 2.22 2.18 2.04 2.37

Overall Attainment 2.05 2.02 2.04 2.05 2.10 2.27 2.07 2.22 2.47 2.28 2.14 2.02 2.02 2.02 2.17

70


CAYm1 2017-18

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3

CIV111 English 2.60 2.30 2.12 2.00 2.00 2.60 2.12







CIV118 Workshop 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00







CIV127 Language Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00





CIV215 Surveying– I 1.14 1.17 0.67 1.22 1.30 1.24 1.11 1.15 1.27 1.17 1.22






71

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3


CIV224 Surveying – II 1.56 1.56 1.27 1.40 1.58 1.53 1.56 1.60





















CIV 326(D) RS & GIS applications in Civil

Engineering 2.20 2.40 3.00 1.80 2.23 2.04 2.40 2.20 2.40 2.25 2.20 2.23 2.50


CIV328 Computer Applications in Civil

Engineering Lab-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

72

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3







CIV415(A) Environmental Impact Assessment 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00


Engineering 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00


CIV418 Fluid Mechanics Lab-II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00




CIV423(B) Solid Waste Management 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

CIV424(B) Ground Improvement Techniques 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

CIV424(C) Prestressed Concrete 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

CIV425 Project Work 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00




73


CAYm2 2016-17

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3

CIV111 English 2.60 2.30 2.00 2.00 2.60 2.00







CIV118 Workshop 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00







CIV127 Language Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00





CIV215 Surveying– I 1.63 1.66 1.33 1.68 1.68 1.70 1.73 1.60 1.75 1.71 1.66 1.68






74

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3


CIV224 Surveying – II 1.40 1.40 1.13 1.20 1.43 1.37 1.40 1.45


CIV226 Building Planning & Drawing 2.13 2.25 2.04 2.23 2.13 2.11 2.25 2.25

2.13 2.20 2.17




CIV311 Reinforced Concrete Structures-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

CIV312 Steel Structures-I 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00

CIV313 Fluid Mechanics-II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

CIV314 Geotechnical Engineering-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00


CIV316 Estimation and Quantity Surveying 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00



CIV319 Softskills Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

CIV321 Structural Analysis-III 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

CIV322 Reinforced Concrete Structures-II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

CIV323 Steel Structures-II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

CIV324 Geotechnical Engineering-II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

CIV325 Fluid Mechanics-III 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

CIV 326(A) Repair and Rehabilitation of

structures 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

CIV 326(B) Remote Sensing and Geographical

Information Systems 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00


CIV328 Concrete Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

75

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3






Engineering 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

CIV416(C) Elements of Solid Waste

Management 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00






CIV423(C) Air Pollution Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

CIV423(D) Ground Improvement Techniques 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

CIV424 Irrigation Structures-Design&Drawing 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

CIV425 Project Work 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00




76

CRITERION 4 Students’ Performance 150

4. STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE (150)

Table B.4a

Item (Information to be provided cumulatively for all the shifts

with explicit headings, wherever applicable)

CAY (2018-19)

CAYm1 (2017-18)

CAYm2 (2016-17)

Sanctioned intake of the program (N) 60 60 60

Total number of students admitted in first year minus number of students migrated to other programs/institutions plus no. of students migrated to this program (N1)

48 56 55

Number of students admitted in 2nd year in the same batch via lateral entry (N2)

* 16 16

Separate division students, if applicable (N3) - - -

Total number of students admitted in the Program (N1 + N2 + N3)

* 72 71

*Admissions into II Year under Lateral entry are in progress.

CAY – Current Academic Year

CAYm1- Current Academic Year minus1= Current Assessment Year

CAYm2 - Current Academic Year minus2=Current Assessment Year minus 1

LYG – Last Year Graduate

LYGm1 – Last Year Graduate minus 1

LYGm2 – Last Year Graduate minus 2

Table B.4b

Year of entry

N1 + N2 + N3 (As defined above)

Number of students who have successfully graduated without

backlogs in any semester/year of study

(Without Backlog means no compartment or failures in any

semester/year of study) I Year II Year III Year IV Year

CAY (2018-19) (48+*+0)=*

CAYm1(2017-18) (56+16+0)=72 33

CAYm2(2016-17) (55+16+0)=71 35 30+15

CAYm3(2015-16) (54+18+0) = 72 35 29+13 28+12

CAYm4(LYG) (2014-15) (53+15+1) = 69 34 28+8 21+8 20+8

CAYm5(LYGm1) (2013-14) (53+14+0) = 71 38 22+6 19+0 16+0

CAYm6 (LYGm2) (2012-13) (59+12+0) = 71 35 29+8 26+8 26+8


77

Table B.4c

Year of entry

N1 + N2 + N3 (As defined above)

Number of students who have successfully graduated (student with backlog in stipulated period of study)

I Year II Year III Year IV Year

CAY (2018-19) (48+*+0)=*

CAYm1 (2017-18) (56+16+0)=72 3

CAYm2 (2016-17) (55+16+0)=71 2 1+1

CAYm3 (2015-16) (54+18+0) = 72 2 3+1 4+2

CAYm4 (LYG) (2014-15)

(53+15+1) = 69 6 5+3 9+4 14+5

CAYm5 (LYGm1) (2013-14)

(53+14+0) = 71 4 1+1 13+7 6+2

CAYm6 (LYGm2) (2012-13)

(59+12+0) = 71 0 6+0 4+0 6+3


4.1 Enrolment ratio (20)

Table B 4.1

S.No. Academic Year N1 N N1/N (%) MARKS

1. CAY (2018-19) 48 60 80 18

2. CAYm1 (2017-18) 56 60 93.33 20

3. CAYm2(2016-17) 55 60 91.66 20

Average 19.33

Item (Students enrolled at the First Year Level on average basis during the period of assessment)

Marks

>=90% students enrolled 20




Otherwise 0

78

4.2. Success Rate in the stipulated period of the program (40) 4.2.1. Success rate without backlogs in any semester/year of study (25) SI= (Number of students who have graduated from the program without backlog) / (Number of students admitted in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and separate division, if applicable) Average SI = Mean of Success Index (SI) for past three batches Success rate without backlogs in any year of study = 25 × Average SI

Table B 4.2.1

Item

Latest Year of Graduation, LYG

(CAYm4) (2014-15)

Latest Year of Graduation minus 1, LYGm1 (CAYm5)

(2013-14)

Latest Year of Graduation minus 2,LYGm2 (CAYm6)

(2012-13)

Number of students admitted in the corresponding First Year + admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and separate division, if applicable

69 71 71

Number of students who have graduated without backlogs in the stipulated period

28 16 34

Success Index (SI) 0.405 0.225 0.478

Average SI 0.369

Success Rate 25x0.369 = 9.2

4.2.2. Success rate in stipulated period (15) SI= (Number of students who graduated from the program in the stipulated period of course duration)/ (Number of students admitted in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and separate division, if applicable)

Average SI = mean of Success Index (SI) for past three batches

Success rate = 15 × Average SI

Table B 4.2.2

Item

LYG (CAYm4) (2014-15)

LYGm1 (CAYm5) (2013-14)

LYGm2 (CAYm6) (2012-13)

Number of students admitted in the corresponding First Year + admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and separate division, if applicable

71 71 71

Number of students who have graduated in the stipulated period 47 44 53

Success Index (SI) 0.661 0.619 0.746

Average Success Index 0.675

Success Rate 15x0.675 = 10.1

79

Note: If 100% students clear without any backlog then also total marks scored will be 40 as both 4.2.1 & 4.2.2 will be applicable simultaneously.

4.3. Academic Performance in Third Year (15) Academic Performance = 1.5 * Average API (Academic Performance Index)

API = ((Mean of 3rd Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or (Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful students in Third Year/10)) x (number of successful students/number of students appeared in the examination)

Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the final year.

Table B 4.3

Academic Performance CAYm1 (2017-18)

CAYm2 (2016-17)

CAYm3 (2015-16)

Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of all successful

students (X) 7.90 7.31 6.16

Total no. of successful students (Y) 48 37 36

Total no. of students appeared in the examination (Z) 71 71 65

API = x* (Y/Z) 5.34 3.81 3.41

Average API = (AP1+AP2+AP3)/3 4.18

Academic Performance 1.5x4.18= 6.3

4.4. Academic Performance in Second Year (15)

Academic Performance Level = 1.5 * Average API (Academic Performance Index)

API = ((Mean of 2nd Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or (Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful students in Second Year/10)) x (number of successful students/number of students appeared in the examination) Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the Third year.

Table B 4.4

Academic Performance

CAYm1 (2017-18)

CAYm2 (2016-17)

CAYm3 (2015-16)

Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of all successful students (X)

7.91 7.89 7.41

Total no. of successful students (Y) 46 48 36

Total no. of students appeared in the examination (Z) 66 71 70

API = X* (Y/Z) 5.51 5.33 3.81

Average API = (AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3 4.88

Academic Performance

1.5x4.88= 7.3

80

4.5. Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship (40) Assessment Points = 40 × average placement

Table B 4.5

Item CAYm1 2017-18

CAYm2 2016-17

CAYm3 2015-16

Total No. of Final Year Students (N) 71 65 70

No. of students placed in companies or Government Sector (x) 15 22 30

No. of students admitted to higher studies with valid qualifying scores (GATE or equivalent State or National Level Tests, GRE, GMAT etc.) (y)

09 5 7

No. of students turned entrepreneur in engineering/technology (z) 0 0 0

x + y + z = 24 27 37

Placement Index : (x + y + z )/N 0.33 0.41 0.53

Average placement= (P1 + P2 + P3)/3 0.42

Assessment points = 40 x 0.42 = 16.8

4.5a. Provide the placement data in the below mentioned format with the name of the program and the assessment year:

Table B 4.5a Placement data

B.Tech Civil Engineering CAY m1 (2017-18)

S.

No.

Name of the student

placed

Enrolment

No.

Name of the

Employer

Appointment

letter reference

No. with date

1 Pachamatla

Suryanarayana Raju

314126508034 Infosys Infosys/1

2 G.Sai Lkashmi

314126508019

KEC International

Limited

KEC/1

3 Ganji Rakesh 314126508015

Krikamit Engg. Pvt.

Ltd.

Krikamit/1

4 Gunnam Sri Sai Lakshmi 314126508019

Krikamit Engg. Pvt.

Ltd.

Krikamit/2

5 Pinninti Srinivasa Rao 314126508038

Krikamit Engg. Pvt.

Ltd.

Krikamit/3

6 Vambaravelli Naveen

Kumar

314126508048

Krikamit Engg. Pvt.

Ltd.

Krikamit/4

7 Kurmadasu Sai Sailendra 314126508057

Krikamit Engg. Pvt.

Ltd.

Krikamit/5

8 Mukala Pavankumar 314126508065

Krikamit Engg. Pvt.

Ltd.

Krikamit/6

9 Ashok Panigrahi 314126508066

Krikamit Engg. Pvt.

Ltd.

Krikamit/7

81

S.

No.

Name of the student

placed

Enrolment

No.

Name of the

Employer

Appointment

letter reference

No. with date


Kumar

314126508048 KPTL

KPTL/1

11 Ashok Panigrahi 314126508066

KPTL

KPTL/2

12 Karri Manikanta Reddy 314126508023

Sobha Developers

Pvt.Ltd., Sobha developers/1

13 Mukala Pavankumar 314126508065

Sobha Developers

Pvt.Ltd., Sobha developers/2

14 Madabattula Sai Akhil 314126508030

Sicagen Pvt.Ltd., Sicagen/1


Kumar

314126508048 James Infinus Pvt Ltd

James Infinus/1


B.Tech Civil Engineering CAY m2 (2016-17)

S. No.

Name of the student placed

Enrolment No.

Name of the Employer

Appointment letter reference

No. with date

1 Bankuru Prathima Lilly 313126508007 Infosys Infosys/1

2 Bobbili Sai Kumar 313126508009 Infosys Infosys/2

3 Chavvakula Divya Sirisha 313126508012 Infosys Infosys /3

4 GodavarthiRajani 313126508018 Infosys Infosys/4

5 V Satya Chakradhar 313126508054 Infosys Infosys/5

6 V Bhuvana 313126508058 Infosys Infosys/6

7 Arasada Venkata Durga Charan

313126508003 Tech Mahindra Tech Mahindra/1

8 Kosuru Anantasairam 313126508032 Tech Mahindra Tech Mahindra/2

9 N Harish Kumar 313126508061 Tech Mahindra Tech Mahindra/3

10 A Jayadev Rama Poorna Pavan

313126508001 Hayagreeva Constructions

Hayagreeva/1

11 Anudeep Kollu 313126508002 Nec, Naval Dockyard Contract

Naval dockyard/1

12 Malla Sree Sai Koushik 313126508034 Ramchandra Constructions

Ramachanra constructions/1

13 Md Ameer Javed 313126508036 Horiculture Engineer, Irrigation Department

Irrigation dept/1

82

S. No.


Enrolment No.



No. with date

14 Natti Hema Sundar 313126508041 VR Constructions VR Constructions/1

15 Pilla Madhu 313126508043 SRK Constructions SRK Constructions/1

16 Sampathi Venkata Saiteja

313126508048 Opel Construction Opel Construction/1

17 Ummidi Chandrakala 313126508052 SDB Infrastructure SDB Infrastructure/1

18 K Ashok Kumar 313126508071 SDB Infrastructure SDB Infrastructure/2

19 V Dilip Kumar 313126508053 Murthy Constructions Murthy Construction/1

20 B Sruthi 313126508062 Ski Detail Company, Madhurawada

Ski Detail Company/1

21 D Naresh 313126508069 Meil, Hyderabad Meil, Hyderabad/1

22 G Hemalatha Devi 313126508072 Asst.Professor, VSM Engineering College

Asst.Professor/ VSM/1


B.Tech. Civil Engineering CAY m3 (2015-16)

S. No.


Enrolment No.



No. with date

1 A Srinivasa Soma Sekhar


2 B Koumudhi 312126508015 Infosys Infosys/2

3 D Siva Hemanth Reddy


4 G Malathi 312126508021 Infosys Infosys/4

5 P Sai Gopal 312126508043 Infosys Infosys/5

6 T Avinash 312126508054 Infosys Infosys/6

7 A Santhosh PraneethSrivatsav

312126508012 IBM IBM/1

8 ChSrinu 312126508016 IBM IBM/2

9 K Polaraju 312126508028 IBM IBM/3

10 P Taraka Laxman Gopal Chowdary

312126508045 IBM IBM/4

11 P Naga V Manikanta 312126508046 IBM IBM/5

83

S. No.


Enrolment No.



No. with date

12 B Bhavani 312126508014 Mu sigma Mu sigma/1

13 G Pujitha 312126508023 Capgemini Capgemini/1

14 P Santosh Kumar 312126508049 Varun motor Varun/1

15 Rambabu K 312126508052 AEE, Govt of A.P Govt of A.P/1

16 K Vijay Babu 312126508060 AEE, Govt of A.P Govt of A.P/2

17 A BhaskarChowdary 312126508011 Grand Project Capital Grand project/1

18 M MounikaDivya 312126508034 Steigen Projects Steigen/1

19 O Poli Raju 312126508042 Trainee Engineer, Steigen Projects

Steigen/2

20 T Mahesh 312126508053 Graduate Trainee Engineer, MEIL

MEIL/1

21 Vema Reddy Gajjela 312126508057 Site Engineer, SRR projects Pvt ltd

SRR/1

22 Y Siva Sai Kiran 312126508058 KMM Technologies KMM/1

23 Y Sairajesh 312126508059 Iron Traingle Limited Iron triangle/1

24 Md Rahimunnisa Begum

312126508062 GEOCON Surveys GEOCON/1

25 D Lavanya 312126508063 J.E., R.R.B RRB/1

26 M Sailaja 312126508064 Moldtek Technologies Moldtek/1

27 K Vara Lakshmi 312126508065 Panchayat Raj Dept, Govt. of A.P.

PR/1

28 S Nookaratnam 312126508066 Lecturer, VITS college VITS/1

29 U Girish Kumar 312126508071 Guest Lecturer, Govt polytechnic, VSKP

Govt polytechnic/1

4.6. Professional Activities (20)

4.6.1. Professional societies/chapters and organizing engineering events (5) (The Department shall provide relevant details)

The details of professional society and chapters are given in Table B 4.6.1a. Faculty members are also members of various Professional Societies including 1) Institution of Engineers (India) 2) Indian Society for Technical Education 3) Indian Geotechnical Society 4) Indian Concrete Institute etc. Details of Events organized are given in Table B 4.6.1c.

84

Table B 4.6.1a Civil Engineering Students Chapters Membership Details

S. No

Name of Professional Society students chapter Members

CAY 2018-19

CAYm1 2017-18

CAYm2 2016-17

1 ASCE ANITS Students chapter - 136 -

2 Institution of Engineers (India) ANITS Civil Engineering students chapter

- 136 135

3 Indian Geotechnical Society ANITS students chapter inaugurated in 2018-19

66 - -

Tables B 4.6.1b Events Organized

CAY 2018 – 19

S. No

Event Schedule Resource person with designation

No. of Participents

1

Dr. K.L.Rao memorial Lecture on Rain Water Harvesting and Recharge of Ground Water

13-07-2018

Dr.T.V.Praveen Professor A.U. College of Engineering, Andhra University

60

2 Workshop on “Foundations and Practice of GIS”

19-11-2018 to

22-11-2018

Kasi Viswanatham Ponnapalli Subject Matter Expert IIC

Academy 66

3 Workshop on “Foundations and Practice of GIS”

19-11-2018 to

22-11-2018

Srikanth Ankam Subject Matter Expert IIC Academy

4 Workshop on “Geotechnical Solutions for Infrastructure Development”

29-12-2018

Dr. G.L Siva Kumar Babu,

Professor of Civil Engineering,

IISC Bengaluru

78


29-12-2018 Srinivasa Raju CEO Geomardy Visakhapatnam


29-12-2018 Madan Kumar Annam, Head of Engineering, Keller India Chennai


29-12-2018 Prof.C.N.V.Satyanarayana Reddy Professor of Civil Engineering Andhra University


29-12-2018 Dr. A. Santha Ram Professor ANITS


29-12-2018 Dr.B.N.D. Narasinga Rao Professor & Head, Civil, ANITS

10 Industrial Visit to Thotapalli and Jangavathi Reservoirs Vizianagaram.

22-09-2018 Sri.T.V.Viswa Teja, M.Premchand, M.Nagalakshmi. Assistant Professors, ANITS

62

11 Industrial Visit to Polavaram Irrigation Project. West Godavari

19-02-2019 Sri. T.Kiran Kumar, P.Vandana Rao, M.Premchand. Assistant Professors, ANITS

57

85


CAYm1 2017 – 18

S. No


No. of Students

1 Guest Lecture on Importance of Geological Investigations

15-09-2017 Dr. A. Santha Ram, Senior Mining Geologist (Retd.) Indian Bureau of Mines

86

2

Model presentation competition in civil engineering on the occasion of 50th Engineers day

15-09-2017 Dr. A. Santha Ram, Senior Mining Geologist (Retd.) Indian Bureau of Mines

12

3

Essay writing and Elocution competition on “Role of engineers in a developing India” on the occasion of 50th Engineers day

15-09-2017 Dr. A. Santha Ram, Senior Mining Geologist, (Retd.), Indian Bureau of Mines

10

4 One-day workshop on ‘Geotechnical Problems and Practises’

11-10-2017 Sri. A K Mehera, Chief Engineer, Visakhapatnam Port Trust

53


11-10-2017 Prof. V Venkateswara Rao (Retd), Andhra University

53


11-10-2017 Sri. Rishi Jaiswal, Scientist-D, DRDO, Visakhapatnam

53


11-10-2017 Prof. C N V Suryanarayana Reddy, Andhra University

46


11-10-2017 Prof. B N D Narasinga Rao, ANITS(A)

46

9 Guest Lecture on Air Pollution sources and Control options

24-10-2017

Ravi Lakshmi Narayana, Environmental Engineer, A.P.Pollution Control Board, Visakhapatnam

57

10 Two-day workshop on ‘E-Tabs’

13-12-2017 to

14-12-2017

I. Prakash, Data Pro,

Visakhapatnam 67

11

Inaugural Lecture on Geotechnics for tunnel alignment, VINIRMITHI’18, Third National Level Students Technical Symposium

16-02-2018

Dr. A.Santharam, Senior Mining

Geologist (Rtd.), Indian Bureau of

Mines 122

12

Valedictory address on Polavaram Irrigation Project, VINIRMITHI’18, Third National Level Students Technical Symposium

17-02-2018

Er.M.T.Raju , Chief Engineer, North

coastal districts, Water resources

deparment 252

86

S. No


No. of Students

13 VINIRMITHI’18, Third National Level Students Technical Symposium

16-02-2018 and 17-02-

2018

Students from ANITS and 10 other Engineering Colleges participated in Paper presentation Contest and other technical and co-curricular events

252

14 Campus Recruitment

Summer Training

17-04-2017 to

28-04-2017 In-house Training 50

15 Campus Recruitment

Summer Training

21-06-2017 to


16 Company specific Training 16-08-2017

to 24-08-2017

In-house Training 50


to 19-09-2017



CAYm2 2016-17

S. No Action taken Schedule


No of Students

1 ASCE ANITS Students Chapter Inaugural Lecture on Emerging trends in civil engineering

01-10-2016 Dr. SivakumarBabu, Professor, Civil Engg., I.I.Sc., Bangalore

100

2

Inauguration Lecture of ANITS IE(I) Students Chapter on Planning and Construction of New Capital of Andhra Pradesh

09-07-2016

Sri. D K Visweswara Rao Chief Engineer, Capital Region Development Authority, Amaravathi

128

3 Dr. K.L.Rao memorial Lecture on Major Irrigation Projects and Interlinking of Rivers

15-07-2016

Sri. R Nageswara Rao, Superintending Engineer, Water Resource Circle, Visakhapatnam

84

4 Seminar on Career Awareness for Engineering Graduates

18-07-2016 Mohamed Abdullah, Director of Conduira Education and Service Ltd

100

5 Wide Open workshop on Speed maths (WOWS)

23-07-2016 to 24-07-

2016


100

6


05-08-2016

Sri. M.K.S.S.K. Chaitanya, V Leela Manusha, Sri.Ch Vineel, Assistant Professors, ANITS

60

7 Seminar on Higher Studies in US (MBA & MS)

15-09-2016 International Knowledge Center

100

87

S. No Action taken Schedule


No of Students

8

Inaugural Lecture on Irrigation Projects of North Coastal districts of A.P., VINIRMITHI’17, Third National Level Students Technical Symposium

14-02-2017

R.Nageswarao, Superintendent Engineer, Water Resources circle, Visahapatnam

136

9 VINIRMITHI’17, Third National Level Students Technical Symposium

14-02-2017 to

15-02-2017

Students from ANITS and 10 other Engineering Colleges participated in Paper presentation Contest and other technical and co-curricular events

136

10 Campus Recruitment Summer

Training

18-04-2016 to



to 28-08-2016



to 19-09-2016


4.6.2. Publication of technical magazines, newsletters etc. (5) (The Department shall list the publications mentioned earlier along with the names of the editors, publishers, etc.)

Table B 4.6.2 Publication of technical magazines etc.

CAY 2018 - 19

Magazine/Newsletter Name Contribution

Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018

Dr. B.N.D.Narasinga Rao Professor & Head

Chief Editor



Article on “Smart Cities: STAR Community Rating System”


J.Vikranth Associate Professor

Article on “ Non Destructive

Testing of Concrete”


T.Kiran Kumar Assistant Professor

Article on “ Innovation in Transportation Engineering”


Ch.Vineel Assistant Professor

Article on “ Ground Improvement techniques for curbing Liquefaction in Related problems”


T.V.Viswa Teja Assistant Professor

Article on “ Gabion-properties , types, Applications & Advantages”

88



P.Vandana Rao Assistant Professor

Article on “ Building Integrated Photovoltaics(BIPV) ”


M.Premchand Assistant Professor

Article on “ Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter ”


Ch.Srinivas Assistant Professor

Article on “ Green Buildings ”


M.Nagalakshmi Assistant Professor

Article on “ Eco friendly Non Plastic Disposables ”


P.V.R.K.Reddy Assistant Professor

Article on “ Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis- The only option for Irregular structures ”


K.Swaroop III/IV Civil student

Article on “ Application of Internet of things (IOT) in Civil Engineering Construction ”


A.Vaghna IV/IV Civil student

Article on “ Soil Trapping tree ”


Ch.Rahul Reddy IV/IV Civil student S.Shanmukha Rao IV/IV Civil student

Article on “ Urban Municipal Waste Management ”


G.Raj Kumar IV/IV Civil student

Article on “ The Jeddah Tower ”


G.Gowri Prasad IV/IV Civil student

Article on “ Eco-Black Brick ”


S. Jagadeesh Prasad IV/IV Civil student

Article on “ Why Can’t We Reuse ”


G.Omkar Ganti IV/IV Civil student

Article on “ Brooklyn Bridge ”


R.L.N. Harish IV/IV Civil student

Article on “ The Future of Transportation Engineering ”


Ch.Soundarya IV/IV Civil student

Article on “ Soil Nailing ”


Ch.Raghu ram IV/IV Civil student Ch.Srinivasa Rao IV/IV Civil student

Article on “ Prefabricated Vertical Drains ”


N.Yesupadam IV/IV Civil student M.Yaswanth Krishna IV/IV Civil student

Article on “ 100 percent Fly Ash Concrete ”

89


CAYm1 2017-18


Echoes College Magazine, 2018

Mr. K.Suryanarayana Assistant Professor

Editorial Board Member


N.Mounika III/IV Civil student

Editorial Board Member Article on “Sophia-Humaniod”


A.Vaghna III/IV Civil student

Editorial Board Member Article on “Murder at dawn”


Mr.T.V.Viswateja Assistant Professor

Article on “SWOC/SWOT analysis”


Mr. J.Harshavardhana Reddy, Assistant Professor

Article on “Air-Heavy to breath”

Civil Engineering News letter, March 2018


Chief Editor


Mr. Ch.Srinivas Assistant Professor

Editorial board member


K.Manikanta Reddy student



CAYm2 2016-17



Ms.LeelaMausha Assistant Professor



V.Chakradhar IV/IV Civil student



P.Durga prasad II/IV Civil student

Article on “Life skills”


M.K.Rameez raja II/IV Civil student

Article on “Importance of Civil Engg”


T.Pavan kumar (I/IV) I/IV Civil student

Article on “open door policy”



Chief Editor


Mr.T.V.V.Teja Assistant Professor



V. Satya Chakradhar student


90

4.6.3 Participation in inter-institute events by students of the program of study (10)

(The Department shall provide a table indicating those publications, which received awards in

the events/conferences organized by other institutes.)

Table 4.6.3 Participation in inter-institute events by students

CAY 2018-19

S. No

Name of the student

Name of the Activity Name of the Organisation

Dates of the event

Prizes won

1 R.Manikumar III/IV Civil

Concrete Challange I.I.T Madras 08-03-2019

to 10-03-2019

1st Prize

2 M.Manohar III/IV Civil


to 10-03-2019

1st Prize

3 K.S. Vinay Srinivas III/IV Civil


to 10-03-2019

1st Prize

4 M.Eswara vara Prasad III/IV Civil


to 10-03-2019

1st Prize

5 M.Manohar III/IV Civil

Geo Genius I.I.T Madras 08-03-2019

to 10-03-2019

1st Prize

6 K.S. Vinay Srinivas III/IV Civil


to 10-03-2019

1st Prize

7 M.Eswara vara Prasad III/IV Civil


to 10-03-2019

2nd Prize

8 T.Pavan Kumar III/IV Civil


to 10-03-2019

2nd Prize

9 B.Vinay Kumar III/IV Civil

Smart City Challenge I.I.T Bhubaneswar 01-02-2019

to 03-02-2019

1st Prize


CAYm1 2017-18

Type of event: Co-curricular

S. No

Name of the student


Dates of the event

Prizes won

1 T.Sai kumar III/IV, Civil

Paper presentation (Shastra)

I.I.T. Madras 05-01-2018 Consola

tion


Paper presentation (ASPIRE2K18)

Aditya College of Engineering, Tekkali

23-02-2018 1st Prize


Paper presentation (CHAKRAVYUH2K18)

Raghu College of Engineering, Visakhapatnam

03-03-2018 2nd Prize

4 J.Vamsikrishna III/IV, Civil

Quiz Competition (SOUDHA2K18)

J.N.T.U.Kakinada 24-02-2018 1st Prize

91

S. No

Name of the student


Dates of the event

Prizes won

5 S.Jagadeesh III/IV, Civil

Paper presentation (Sahastra)

I.I.T.Madras 05-01-2018 Consola

tion

6 B.Vineeth III/IV, Civil

Paper presentation (Sahastra)

I.I.T.Madras 05-01-2018 Consola

tion

7 B.Gnana Sagar III/IV, Civil



8 Ch.Raguram III/IV, Civil



9 K.BindhuBargavi III/IV, Civil

Paper presentation (SATHAKARYAN)

GVP College of Engineering

30-12-2017 2nd Prize

10 D.Manikumari III/IV, Civil



30-12-2017 2nd Prize

11 A.Vaghna III/IV, Civil



30-12-2017 2nd Prize

Type of event: Extra-curricular

S. No

Name of the student


Dates of the event

Prizes won

12 G.Sai lakshmi IV/IV, Civil

Table Tennis (Women)

AUCE(A) 12-09-2017 to 13-09-2017

1st Prize

13 S.Shanmukharao III/IV civil

Chess Championship AU inter collegiate 12-09-2017 to 13-09-2017

1st Prize


CAYm2 2016-17

Type of event: Co-curricular

S. No

Name of the student


Dates of the event

Prizes won

1 D.Joy S.Sarvani

Tech Expo Vignan Institute of Technology, Vskp

March 17-18, 2017

1st prize

2 R.Manasa G.Neeharika

Paper Presentation Contest

Vignan Institute of Technology, Vskp

March 17-18, 2017

3rd prize

3

B. Sumalatha M.Manasa D.Joy S.Sarvani R.Manasa

Treasure Hunt Vignan Institute of Technology, Vskp

March 17-18, 2017

2nd Prize

4 N.Mounika, A.Vaghna

Paper Presentation Contest

J.N.T.U.Kakinada March 9-10,

2017 2nd prize

5 J.Swetha Just A Minute S.R.K.R College of

Engineering

January 5-6, 2017

1st Prize

6 M.Dhana lakshmi Quiz S.R.K.R College of

Engineering

January 5-6, 2017

1st Prize

92

Type of event: Extra-curricular

S.

No

Name of the

student Name of the Activity

Name of the

Organisation

Dates of the

event

Prizes

won

7 G.Sai lakshmi

III/IV, Civil

Table Tennis

(Women)

AUCE(A) Sep, 2016 1st Prize

8

B. Sumalatha

M.Manasa

S.Sarvani

S.Bhavani

Tech Expo Mech UTSAV Tech

Fest,

GITAM,

Viisakhapatnam

December

30-31, 2016

1st Prize

93

CRITERION 5 Faculty Information and Contributions 200

Details for the faculty of the Department for all academic years to be provided in Table B.5 Details for the faculty of the department, cumulative information for all academic years starting from current year in above format in Annexure - 12.

5.1. Student Faculty Ratio (SFR) (20) (To be calculated at Department Level)

No. of UG Programs in the Department (n): _____1_____ No. of PG Programs in the Department (m): _____1_____ No. of Students in UG 2nd Year= u1 No. of Students in UG 3rd Year= u2 No. of Students in UG 4th Year= u3 No. of Students in PG 1st Year= p1 No. of Students in PG 2nd Year= p2 No. of Students = Sanctioned Intake + Actual admitted lateral entry student (The above data to be provided considering all the UG and PG programs of the department) S=Number of Students in the Department = U1 + U2 + U3 + P1 + P2 F = Total Number of Faculty Members in the Department (excluding first year faculty)

Student Teacher Ratio (STR) = S/F

Table B.5.1

Year CAY

(2018-19) CAYm1

(2017-18) CAYm2

(2016-17)

u1 73 68 72

u2 66 71 73

u3 70 71 65

p1 4 2 -

Total No. of Students in the Department (S) 215 212 210

No. of Faculty in the Department (F) 16 16 14

Student Faculty Ratio (SFR) 13.44 13.25 15

Average SFR 13.90

* M. Tech. (Soil Mechanics) commenced w.e.f. CAYm1 2017-18 Marks Obtained: 20 Note: Marks to be given proportionally from a maximum of 20 to a minimum of 10 for average SFR between 15:1 to 25:1, and zero for average SFR higher than 25:1. Marks distribution is given as below: < = 15 - 20 Marks

94

< = 17 - 18 Marks < = 19 - 16 Marks < = 21 - 14 Marks < = 23 - 12 Marks < = 25 - 10 Marks > 25.0 - 0 Marks

Minimum 75% should be Regular/ full time faculty and the remaining shall be Contractual Faculty as per AICTE norms and standards.

The contractual faculty (doing away with the terminology of visiting/adjunct faculty, whatsoever) who have taught for 2 consecutive semesters in the corresponding academic year on full time basis shall be considered for the purpose of calculation in the Student Faculty Ratio.

5.1.1. Provide the information about the regular and contractual faculty as per the format mentioned below:

Table B 5.1.1

Total number of regular faculty in the department

Total number of contractual (Adjunct) faculty in the department

CAY (2018-19) 14 2

CAYm1 (2017-18) 14 2

CAYm2 (2016-17) 12 2

5.2. Faculty Cadre Proportion (25) The reference Faculty cadre proportion is 1(F1):2(F2):6(F3) F1: Number of Professors required = 1/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 20:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1

F2: Number of Associate Professors required = 2/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 20:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1

F3: Number of Assistant Professors required = 6/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 20:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1

Table B 5.2

Year

Professors Associate Professors Assistant Professors

Required F1

Available Required F2

Available Required F3

Available

CAY 2018-19

2(1.2) 3 3(2.4) 0 7(7.1) 13

CAYm1 2017-18

2(1.2) 3 2(2.4) 0 7(7.3) 13

CAYm2 2016-17

2(1.2) 3 2(2.3) 0 7 (6.99) 11

Average Numbers

RF1=2

AF1=3

RF2=2.33

AF2=0

RF3=7.00

AF3=12.33

95

5.124.06.03

3

2

2

1

1

RF

AF

RF

AF

RF

AFMarksRatioCadre

Cadre Ratio Marks = 3.00 + 0.00 x 0.6 + 12.33 x 0.4 x 12.5

2.00 2.33 7.00

= 27.5

Marks obtained = 27.5

If AF1 = AF2 = 0 then zero marks

Maximum marks to be limited if it exceeds 25 Example:Intake = 60 (i.e, total no of students = 180); Required number of Faculty:9; RF1=1, RF2=2

and RF3=6

Case1: AF1/RF1 = 1; AF2/RF2 = 1; AF3/RF3 = 1; Cadre proportion marks = (1+0.6+0.4) x 12.5 = 25

Case2: AF1/RF1 = 1; AF2/RF2 = 3/2; AF3/RF3 = 5/6; Cadre proportion marks = (1+0.9+0.3) x 12.5 = limited to 25

Case3: AF1/RF1 = 0; AF2/RF2 = 1/2; AF3/RF3 = 8/6; Cadre proportion marks = (0+0.3+0.53) x 12.5 = 10.4 5.3. Faculty Qualification (25)

FQ = 2.5 x [(10X+4Y)/F)] where x is no. of regular faculty with Ph.D., Y is no. of regular faculty with M. Tech,

F is no. of regular faculty required to comply 20:1 Faculty Student ratio (no. of faculty and no. of students

required are to be calculated as per 5.1)

Table B.5.3

Years X Y F FQ = 2.5 x [(10X+4Y)/F)]

CAY 2018-19

1 13 11 14.09

CAYm1 2017-18

1 13 11 14.09

CAYm2 2016-17

1 11 11 12.27

Average Assessment 13.48

Marks obtained = 13.48

96

5.4 Faculty Retention (25)

Table B 5.4 No. of regular faculty members

Number of required regular faculty in CAYm3 (2015-16) = 9

S.No. Year No. of required

regular

faculty members

retained*

% of required

regular

faculty members

retained*

Marks

1 CAY (2018-19) 8 88.9 20

2 CAYm1 (2017-18) 8 88.9 20

3 CAYm2 (2016-17) 8 88.9 20

* keeping CAYm3 as the base year

Table B.5.4

Item (% of faculty retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm3 as base year)

Marks

>=90% of required Faculty members retained during the period of three academic years keeping CAYm3 as base year

25


20


15


10

<50% of required Faculty members retained during the period of three academic years keeping CAYm3 as base year

0

Annexure-12 shows details of faculty during CAYm3

5.5. Innovations by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning (20) Innovations by the Faculty in teaching and learning shall be summarized as per the following description.

Contributions to teaching and learning are activities that contribute to the improvement of student learning. These activities may include innovations not limited to, use of ICT, instruction delivery, instructional methods, assessment, evaluation and inclusive class rooms that lead to effective, efficient and engaging instruction. Any contributions to teaching and learning should satisfy the following criteria:

The work must be made available on Institute website

The work must be available for peer review and critique

The work must be reproducible and developed further by other scholars

The department/institution may set up appropriate processes for making the contributions available to the public, getting them reviewed and for rewarding. These may typically include statement of clear goals, adequate preparation, use of appropriate methods, significance of results, effective presentation and reflective critique

Fig. B 5.5 illustrates the Innovations by the Faculty in teaching – learning, and they are explained below

97

1) Use of Teaching-Learning techniques

Incorporating the maxims of teaching such as known to unknown, whole to part, concrete to

abstract etc., into T-L process as much as possible to make it more effective

Adopting to different learning styles of students such as verbal, visual, kinaesthetic, interpersonal

etc., while planning the T-L process as much as possible

Activity based learning such as group task, student seminar etc.

Assigning a topic to the group of students and guiding them to give presentations.

Fig. B 5.5 Innovations by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning

2) Use of e-resources and ICT

Providing quick access to the Instructional material, PPTs, Question Bank etc., by hosting them on

MOODLE platform on Department website to help students to learn the concepts at their

convenient time.

Conducting online Quiz on MOODLES through Institution website.

Motivating the students for using Internet facility available in the department for deeper inquiry into the subjects.

98

3) Mentoring students with backlogs

Mentoring students with backlogs by concerned subject faculty before supplementary

examinations

Encouraging Peer teaching to enable students to attain self learning skills.

4) Encouraging Advanced learners

Encouraging the students to give presentations on recent advances in civil engineering, related to

the concerned subject.

Conducting special classes to IV year students in GATE

Conducting Mock GATE examinations to IV year students

Conducting Campus Recruitment Training during Summer after III year to enhance employability

skills

Conducting Company specific training before campus placements in IV Year

5) Action on Curricular gaps

Organizing workshops/training programs on E-Tabs, RSGIS Software, STAAD Pro. etc., to make

them industry ready.

Organizing FDPs/Workshops to faculty on Arc GIS and Sponsoring faculty for FDPs/Workshops at

higher learning Institutes, which will indirectly benefit the students in the T-L process

6) Covering Topics beyond curriculum

Faculty seminars on topics beyond curriculum in each course in regular class work.

Organizing student seminars on topics beyond curriculum.

Demonstration of advanced topics beyond curriculum by referring research journals and NPTEL

materials

7) To help students monitor and reinforce their learning

Conducting class tests from a previously circulated Question bank.

Guiding the students to solve previous GATE problems.

Demonstration of advanced topics beyond curriculum by referring research journals and NPTEL

materials

5.6. Faculty as participants in Faculty development/training activities/STTPs (15)

A Faculty scores maximum five points for participation

Participation in 2 to 5 days Faculty development program: 3 Points Participation>5 days Faculty development program: 5 points

Table B.5.6

Faculty participation in FDPs/STTPs

Name of the Faculty Max. 5 per Faculty

CAY (2018-19)

CAYm1 (2017-18)

CAYm2 (2016-17)

Dr. B N D Narasinga Rao 5 5

J. Vikranth 3

M K S S K Chaitanya 3

T Kiran Kumar

99

Name of the Faculty Max. 5 per Faculty

CAY (2018-19)

CAYm1 (2017-18)

CAYm2 (2016-17)

P V R Sravya

Ch Vineel 5 3

T V Viswa Teja 5 5

B Ramana Raja 5

V.Leela Manusha 5

D.Sindhuja 5

A.Vamsi Krishna 5

P.Vandana Rao 5 3 3

M. Premchand 3 5

Ch. Srinivas 3 5

J. Harsha Vardhana Reddy 5 3

K. Suryanarayana 3 3

M. Nagalakshmi 5

P.V.R.K. Reddy 3

Sum 38 29 36

RF= Number of Faculty required to comply with 20:1 Student-Faculty ratio as per 5.1

11 13 12

Assessment = 3 × (Sum/0.5RF) (Marks limited to 15)

15 13.38 15

Average assessment over three years (Marks limited to 15)

14.46

5.7. Research and Development (30) 5.7.1. Academic Research (10) Academic research includes research paper publications, Ph.D. guidance, and faculty receiving Ph.D. during the assessment period.

Number of quality publications in refereed/SCI Journals, citations, Books/Book Chapters etc. (6)

Ph.D. guided /Ph.D. awarded during the assessment period while working in the institute (4)

All relevant details shall be mentioned.

Number of quality publications in refereed/SCI Journals, citations, Books/Book Chapters etc.

1) Text Book: B.N.D.Narasinga Rao (single author), Text Book on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Wiley India, First Indian Edition 2015, pages 1089, ISBN: 978-81-265-3956-7. The book is prescribed by more than 10 universities and autonomous colleges.

100

2) Number of faculty publications in Journals is summarized in Table B 5.7.1a

List of Faculty Publications enclosed as Annexure-13

Table B 5.7.1a

Faculty publications in Journals Name of Faculty contributing

to Research Publication

CAY

(2018-19)

CAYm1

(2017-18)

CAYm2

(2016-17)

Dr. B.N.D. Narasinga Rao 1 1 2

Mr. J. Vikranth - 2 1

Mr. M.K.S.S. Krishna Chaitanya 2 1 1

Mr. T. Kiran Kumar - 1 1

Mrs. P.V.R. Sravya 3 1 3

Mr. Ch. Vineel 1 2 -

Mr. T.V.Viswa Teja 2 1 -

Mrs. P. Vandana Rao 1 1 1

Mr. M.Premchand 1 1 -

Mr. Ch. Srinivas 2 2 -

Mr. K. Suryanarayana - 1 -

Mr. J. Harha Vardhana Reddy 1 1 -

Ms. M. Nagalakshmi - 1 -

Mr. P.V.R.K. Reddy 1 - -

Total 15 16 09

Ph.D. guided /Ph.D. awarded during the assessment period while working in the institute Details of faculty pursuing Ph.D. are given in Table B 5.7.1b

Table B 5.7.1b

S. No

Name of the Faculty Date of registering for Ph.D.

Name of Guide University Work Completed

(%)

Expected year of

completion

1 J.Vikranth 11-08-2008 Dr.K.Rambabu Andhra

University 100 2019

2 M.K.S.S.Krishna Chaitanya

07-01-2014 Prof.K.Srinivasa Rao

Andhra University

60 2020

3 T.Kiran Kumar 17-04-2018 Prof.K.Durga Rani Andhra

University 10 2023

4 P.Vandana Rao 18-05-2018 Prof.C.N.V.Satyanarayana Reddy

Andhra University

10 2023

5 K.Suryanarayana 17-04-2018 Dr.K.Rambabu Andhra

University 10 2023

6 Ch. Srinivas 04-02-2019 Dr. G. Yesuratnam

JNTUK, Kakinada

0 2025

101

5.7.2. Sponsored Research (5)

(Provide a list with Project Title, Funding Agency, Amount and Duration)

Name of the Faculty Dr.B.N.D. Narasinga Rao

Project Title Wealth from Waste: Fly ash characterization for its bulk utilization in Geotechnical Engineering Applications

Duration 2 Years

Agency UGC

Date of Sanction 30-06-2017

Amount (Rs.) 3,10,000

Funding amount (Cumulative during assessment years):

Amount >20Lacs–5Marks

Amount>=16Lacsand<=20lacs-4Marks

Amount>=12Lacsand<16lacs–3Marks Amount>=8Lacsand<12lacs–2Marks

Amount>=4Lacsand<8lacs–1Mark

Amount<4Lacs–0Mark

5.7.3. Development activities (10)

Detailed Instructional Material in accordance with the syllabus is made available on the institute website.

Working Models and charts are developed for better understanding of the students.

5.7.4. Consultancy (from Industry) (5)

(Provide a list with Project Title, Funding Agency, Amount and Duration)

Total Value of Consultancy Projects: Rs.10,77 ,997

CAYm1 (2017-2018)

Name of the Faculty Project Title Details

Duration Agency Amount (Rs.)

Dr.B.N.D. Narasinga Rao

Geotechnical investigations for Waste to Energy Power plant at Kapuluppada Municipal dump site

Oct-Dec

2017

M/s Jindal Urban Waste Management (Visakha) Limited

9,01,222


Construction of G + 2 Building at Thagarapuvalasa

March 2018

PM Jacob 4,600

102

CAYm2 (2016-2017)

Name of the Faculty Project Title Details Duration Agency Amount

(Rs.)


Geotechnical Investigations for Waste to Energy Plant at

Kappuluppada, Visakhapatnam

October-November

2016

M/s Jindal Urban Waste

Management (Visakha) Limited

1,64,675

J. Vikranth Construction of Library, Near e-seva Visakhapatnam

Sep 2016 GVMC 7500

CAYm3 (2015-16)

NIL

Funding amount (Cumulative during CAYm1,CAYm2 & CAYm3)

Amount>10Lacs–5Marks

Amount>=8Lacs and<=10lacs–4Marks

Amount>=6Lacsand<8lacs–3Marks

Amount>=4Lacsand<6lacs–2Marks

Amount>=2Lacsand<4lacs–1Mark

Amount<2Lacs–0Mark

Marks Obtained = 5 M

5.8 Faculty Performance Appraisal and Development Systems (FPADS)(30)

Faculty members of Higher Educational Institutions have to perform a variety of tasks pertaining to diverse

roles. In addition to instruction, Faculty members need to innovate and conduct research for their sel f-

renewal, keep a breast with changes in technology, and develop expertise for effective implementation of curricula. They are also expected to provide services to the industry and community for understanding and

contributing to the solution of real life problems in industry. Another role relates to the shouldering of

administrative responsibilities and co-operation with other Faculty, Heads-of-Departments and the Head

of Institute. An effective performance appraisal system for Faculty is vital for optimizi ng the contribution of

individual faculty to institutional performance.

The assessment is based on:

A well-defined system for faculty appraisal for all the assessment years (10)

ANITS has well defined Performance Appraisal system which was revised and improved as per UGC norms.

The Pro-forma and guidelines for Performance Appraisal (June 2016 version) are given in Annexure -14.

103

Performance Appraisal System @ ANITS Minimum Academic Performance Indicators (API’s) to be attained by the faculty for each of the categories

based on the cadre

S No

Category Maximum API score

Minimum API*

Assistant Professor < 3 year

experience

Assistant Professor

more than 3 year

experience

Associate Professor

Professor

1 Teaching, Learning And

Evaluation Related Activities

100 60 60 60 60

2

Co-Curricular, Extension And Professional

Development Related Activities.

40 20 20 20 20

3 Research And

Academic Contributions

** 10 20 30 35

*For awarding annual increment the faculty has to score the minimum points in each of the categories as

mentioned in the table above.

** There is no upper limit for the maximum API score for 3rd category.

S. No.

Indicators / Activities Max. Score

1 TEACHING, LEARNING AND EVALUATION RELATED ACTIVITIES

1.1

Lectures, Seminars, tutorials, practicals, project: Minimum lecture hours --Professor: 12 hours/week ; Associate Prof: 14 Hours /week ; Asst. Prof: 16 Hrs/Week Score proportional to workload and average of two semesters. Two seminar / project hours is to be considered as one Lecture hour only.

20

1.2 Feedback on the Courses taught Feedback score proportional to percentage of feedback marks –average of two semesters of two or more subjects.

25

1.3

Pass percentage : Pass percentage in the subjects taught during the previous year. Score proportional to pass percentage upto 60%. Below 60% score is nil. To be calculated as average of two semesters.

25

1.4 Preparation of study material / resources with proof for all courses he/she teaches and complete assessment and attainment of outcomes

10

1.5

Innovative / student centric teaching-learning methods Use of ICT based Teaching material/Interactive sessions/Participatory learning modules/Remedial classes/Bridge courses. Teaching beyond curriculum with clear details of topics and its usefulness to the students

10

1.6 Curriculum preparation and Examination related work Curriculum preparation: coordinator-10 points, member -5 points College/University End semester examination work: 5 points

10

104

S. No.


Total 100

2

CO-CURRICULAR, EXTENSION OR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

2.1

Co-curricular activities Subject related events: Lectures on special topics; Quiz/debate/ elocution; study tour; Exhibition; Department Association; Guiding students in inter-institute events; Initiatives related to industry internship/summer training; Any other activity for student development Extension Activities Institute-Industry interaction; Training industry persons, offering special courses

5

2.2

Professional Development activities in the campus Participation in Seminar/workshop/symposia (2 marks); conferences (2); FDPs (5); STTPs (5); Lectures/Talks delivered in programs (2); Membership of Associations- (3); Publication of general articles (2); General awareness activity (2) Community work such as National integration, secularism, democracy, humanism, peace, scientific temper, flood or drought relief etc. (max.5)

10

2.3

Department Administration Members of committees like Admissions; discipline; Anti-ragging; laboratory equipment procurement, utilization, maintenance and safety; any other role assigned by Principal/HoD (5) NAAC/NBA/Autonomous/BOS etc., coordinator (10); member(5) with 100% compliance

15

2.4

Mentoring to help the students at individual level (a)Guidance in course work specific/ laboratory specific/all-round development (5 marks) The faculty member shall report the details of counselling/ mentoring the students for various purposes such as i) Academics ii) Co-curricular activities iii) Extra-curricular activities iv) discipline & regularity v) self-learning vi) grievance redressal (b)Career Guidance, Training, Placement, Entrepreneurship (5) Contribution of faculty member for career guidance, subject coaching, Special classes for GATE, mock tests, communication skills.

10

Total 40

3 Research and Academic Contributions -

3.1

Research Papers published: Referred journals: Score per paper 15 if Imp. Fac.<1; 25 if I.F. 1to2; 30 if I.F.2 to 5; 40 if I.F. 5 to 10 ( with citation 25) Non-refereed but recognized and reputable journals and periodicals with ISBN/ISSN: 10/paper Conference proceedings as full paper: 10/paper (Note: First or Second Author 100% score; Third and above 50% )

3.2 Publications (Books, chapters in books other than journal)

Text books: 50/ author; 10/chapter in an edited book.

3.3

Research Projects Completed/Ongoing Sponsored Projects. (In case of Principal / CO investigator points are to be shared in 70:30 ratio). Grant >Rs. 30 Lakhs (40 per Project). Grant > Rs.5 Lakhs (30 per Project). Grants > Rs. 50,000 (20 per Project).

105

S. No.


3.4

Research Guidance (In case of joint supervision points are to be shared in 70: 30 ratio) M. Phil. / M Tech (Degree awarded only) (5 per candidate). Ph. D. (Degree awarded only) (20 per candidate). Ph. D. Guidance (5M) Thesis submitted (10 per candidate).

3.5

Consultancy Provide a list of Consultancy works with amount accrued Consultancy amount: Amount > 0.5 Lac – 20 points Amount < 0.5 Lac –10 points

3.6

Participation or Presentation in Training Courses/ Conference/ Seminar/ Workshop

i. Participation in Training Courses/ Conference/ Seminar/ Workshop: 2 week-20/each; 1 week-10/each; 2-4 days – 5/each

ii. **Participation and Presentation of research papers (oral/poster) in Conferences/ Seminars/ workshops etc. International conference (10/activity); National (7.5/activity); Regional/State level (5/activity); Local - University/college level (3 /activity)

iii. Invited lectures or presentations for conferences/ Seminar/ Training Course/Refresher Course/Orientation Course: International Level (10 per lecture); National Level (5 per lecture); Regional Level (3 per lecture); Local- University/College Level (2 per lecture)

3.7

Training Courses / Conference /Seminar/Workshop Organised Programme: 2 weeks or more: 30 points; 1 week: 20points ;< 1 week : 10points. In case of Co-convener/Jt. Organizing Secretary points are to be shared in 70: 30 ratio:

3.8

Award/ Honours /Recognitions International level honour/recognition/award (30 per award) National level honour/recognition/award (25 per award) State level honour/recognition/award (20 per award)

** If a paper is presented in conference / seminar is published in the form of proceedings , the points would accrue for 3.1 but not for 3.6 (ii).

Its implementation and effectiveness (20) 20M

The pro forma for Performance Appraisal (See Annexure-14) is circulated to the faculty members, who will

fill up the same and enclose required annexures as proof. HoD reviews the filled-in pro forma submitted by

the faculty member and awards his/her evaluation marks. The Appraisal form is then reviewed by Principal and submitted to the Management for award of Annual increment based on the performance.

Marks Obtained = 30M

5.9. Visiting/Adjunct/Emeritus Faculty etc. (10)

Adjunct faculty also includes Industry experts. Provide details of participation and contributions in teaching and learning and /or research by visiting/adjunct/Emeritus faculty etc. for all the assessment years:

Provision of inviting/having visiting/adjunct/emeritus faculty (1)

Minimum 50 hours per year interaction with adjunct faculty from industry/retired professors etc.

(Minimum 50 hours interaction in a year will result in 3 marks for that year; 3 marks x 3 years = 9 marks)

Details of contribution of adjunct faculty in teaching and learning is given in Table B 5.9

106

Table B 5.9

S.

No. Name of Faculty Year & Semester Subject Handled

No. of hours

CAY

(2018-19)

CAYm1

(2017-18)

CAYm2

(2016-17)

1 A.Santha Ram M.Tech Ist year Ist

Semester

Numerical Methods 52 - -

2 Dr.V.Venkateshwara Rao IInd Year & Ist

Semester

Engineering Geology - - 74

3 Prof. A. Ramamohana Rao IInd Year & Ist

Semester

Surveying- I 78 73 76

Surveying Field Work - I 42 48 48

IInd Year & IInd

Semester

Fluid Mechanics - I 91 81 96

Fluid Mechanics Lab - I 48 33 39

IIIrd Year & Ist

Semester

Fluid Mechanics Lab - II 42 51 -

IVth Year & Ist

Semester

Fluid Mechanics Lab - II - - 42

Total No of hours 353 286 375

Marks Obtained: 1+9=10

107

CRITERION 6 Facilities and Technical Support 80

6. FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT (80)

6.1. Adequate and well equipped laboratories, and technical manpower (30)

S. No

Name of the Laboratory

Number of

students per batch

Name of the important equipment

Weekly utilization status (all the courses for which the lab is

utilized)

Technical manpower support

Name of the technical staff

Designation Qualification

1 Surveying Lab 3 1) Total Station; 2) Auto Level; 3) Dumpy Level; 4) Theodolite

I Semester (50%) 1. II/IV Surveying Field work-I (2)* 2. IV/IV Project work(3)

N.Simhachalam Lab Technician

ITI (Fitter)

II Semester (50%) 1. II/IV Surveying Field Work- II (2) 2. IV/IV Project Work(3)

2 Geotechnical Engineering Lab

3 1) Tri axial cell; 2) Direct Shear Apparatus; 3) Consolidation equipment; 4) CBR Testing apparatus; 5) Relative density testing apparatus;

I Semester (50%) 1) III/IV- Geotechnical Engineering

Lab-I(2) 2) IV-I-Project Work(3)

N.Ganeshwara Rao

Lab Technician

ITI (Fitter)

II Semester (50%) 1. III-II/IV- Geotechnical

Engineering Lab-II(2) 2. IV-II-Project Work(3)

3 Concrete Technology Lab

4 1. Compression Testing Machine,

2. Flexure Testing Machine

3. VeeBee Consistometer 4. Concrete mixer

I Semester (30%) 1. IV-I-Project Work (3)

P. Ram babu Technician ITI (Fitter)

II Semester (70%) 1. II/IV- Concrete Lab(2) 2. II-II/IV- Concrete Lab

(Autonomous)(2) 3. IV-II-Project Work.(3)

108

S. No


Number of

students per batch



utilized)




4 Transportation Engineering Lab

3 1. Abrasion Testing Machine;

2. Ductility testing machine;

3. Impact testing equipment

I Semester (20%) 1. IV-I/IV Transportation

Engineering Lab(2)

P. Ram babu Technician ITI (Fitter)

5 Computer Applications in Civil Engineering Lab

1 Total No. of Computers- 45 Licensed Software 1. Staad Pro, 2. ARC GIS

I Semester (50%) 1. III/IV CACE I,(2)

R. Ramesh Programmer DOEACC

II Semester (50%) 2. III /IV CACE-II(2)

6 Project Lab Total No. of Computers- 45 Licensed Software 3. Staad Pro, 4. ARC GIS

I Semester (50%) 1. IV/IV Project work- I,(2)

R. Ramesh Programmer DOEACC

II Semester (50%) 2. IV/IV Project work- II (2)

7 Communication Skills Lab*

2 - II Semester (10%) 2. I /IV English lab (1)

- - -

8 Physics Lab* 4 1.Newton rings apparatus

I Semester (10%) 2. I /IV Physics Lab (1)

P.Teju Aswini Technician MSc (Physics)

9 Chemistry Lab* 1 1.pH meter 2.Titration Equipment (Pippete and Burrete)

II Semester (10%) 2. I /IV Chemistry Lab (1)

D.Suresh Technician BSc Chemistry

10 Workshop* 2 1.Carpentry 2. Tinsmithy

I Semester (10%) 2. I /IV Wrokshop (1)

M.Raja Technician Diploma

109

S. No


Number of

students per batch



utilized)




11 C Programming Lab*

1 Total No. of Computers- 40 1.C Language Software

I Semester (10%) I /IV C-Programming lab(1)

P.V.Siva kumar Yadav

Programmer BSc (Computers)

12 CAD in Civil Engineering Lab*

1 1.AUTO CAD Software 2.STAAD software 3.C-Programming

I Semester (20%) IV /IV CAD Lab (2)

R.Santosh Kumar

Programmer BSc (Computers) & I.T.I Welder

13 Soft skills Lab* 10 - II Semester (10%) 2. III /IV Soft Skills Lab-(1)

- - -

14 Strength of Materials Lab*

5 1.Universal Testing Machine

I Semester (20%) 2. II /IV SM-Lab-(2)

B.Rama Rao Technician ITI (Fitter)

15 Fluid Mechanics & Hydraulic Machines Lab*

6 1.Rectangular & Trapezoidal notch 2.Pelton wheel and Francis Turbine

II Semester (20%) 2. II /IV FM-Lab-I(2)

D.Srinivas Technician Diploma

I Semester (20%) 2. III /IV FM Lab-II(2)

16 Environmental Engineering Lab*

1 1.BOD Incubator 2.JAR Test

I Semester (50%) III /IV EELab (2) IV/IV Project work- I,(2)

B.V.G.Narayana Senior Technician

BSc (Chemistry)

II Semester (20%) IV/IV Project work- II,(2)

* shared with other Departments Note: Figures in brackets indicates No of slots

110

6.2 Additional facilities created for improving the quality of learning experience in laboratories (25)

S. No

Facility Name Details Reason(s) for creating facility

Utilization Areas in which students are expected to have enhanced

Learning

Relevance to

Pos/PSOs

1 Marshall Stability Apparatus

Date: 19-09-2018; Cost: Rs 1,56,852

Company: AIMIL; No’s: 1

To enable students to do Project work

Project work Pavement design 1,2,3/1,2

2

Computer Applications in Civil Engineering Lab-II

Arc GIS Software Date: 03-11-2017; Cost: Rs.

7,38,680 Company: ESRI;

No of Licenses: 41

Providing exposure and hands on experience to

students in RS&GIS

Class work & Project work

Remote Sensing & Geographical Information

System (RS&GIS)

1,2,3,5/1,2,3

3 Project Laboratory

Computer centre with 45 desktop systems, server and UPS is established exclusively for the

Department

To enable students to do Project work

Project work Civil Engineering Projects in all

specializations 1,5/1,2

4 Dynamic cone penetration Test Apparatus

Date: 31-03-2017; Cost:Rs.58,773


To determining the resistance of different

types of soil strata

Class work & Project work

Geotechnical Engineering 1,3,4,9/

1,2,3

5 Accelerated Curing Tank

Date: 28-11-2016; Cost:Rs.1,34,677


To reduce curing time of concrete specimens

Class work, Project work and

Research work Concrete Technology 1,4/1,2

6 Needle Vibrator Date: 28-11-16; Cost:Rs. 26,351


To expose the students to practical construction

methods

Class work, Project work, & Research work

Concrete Technology 1,5/1,2

111

6.3 Laboratories: Maintenance and overall ambiance (10)

(Self-Explanatory) To ensure high quality technical education to the students, the college provides best possible

infrastructure facilities in the campus. The college is located in serene atmosphere, in an area covering 12

acres and has a built-up area of over 3.00 lakh sq.ft of RCC Buildings. All laboratories are spacious, well

ventilated and provided with adequate electrical fittings to take care of ambiance.

Electricity, power backup, telecom facility, drinking water, and security

Electricity, Power backup: Electrical power is supplied to ANITS through a 11 K.V 3 - phase feeder from

A.P. Transco. The supply is received in 11 K.V/415V substation located inside the campus. ANITS has

20KVA, 125 KVA and 250 KVA standby diesel generators to support incase the A.P. Transco supply fails.

This is more than 100% backup. These generators supply power to all departments, administrative block,

library and the girls’ hostel.

Water supply: There are 5 bore wells in ANITS campus with adequate yield to fully meet the water

requirement for drinking, laboratory use and other purposes. An RO Plant (Mineral Water Plant) with a

capacity of 1000 Liters per hour for drinking is also established. It supplies drinking water to all the

departments and the Boys’ & Girls’ hostels through water coolers.

Telecom: At present, ANITS has 8 telephone lines, and an expandable EPABX with 180 lines to connect all

Departments and a FAX.

(a) Academic Building Maintenance:

Estate Supervisor – looks after maintenance of buildings and green covers.

(b) Laboratory Equipment Maintenance:

All the equipment in the laboratories is maintained on a regular basis by the concerned laboratory

technicians under the guidance and supervision of the laboratory in charge (Faculty members) . General

servicing is done during summer vacation before commencement of academic year. Servicing is also done

whenever necessary. Calibration is being done to the equipment whenever needed. AMC is in practice

wherever necessary.

An equipment maintenance register is maintained separately for each laboratory to record the

maintenance, repairs and servicing if any carried out for the equipment.

(i) For Computers: Routine complaints are looked after by an internal team of programmers and

technicians

(ii) For large & expensive equipment: Malfunctioning of equipment is referred to the supplier of the

equipment for necessary servicing and repairs

(c) Ambience, green cover, water harvesting, environment preservation etc.

Ambience has been given special importance for the students to feel refreshed when they enter

the Campus.

Green lawn was developed and trees grown in the campus for good ambience and greenery

Water harvesting provided at three different locations such that all the rain water is harvested.

To add to protection of environment and to reduce the load on conventional electrical energy,

solar heaters had been arranged in the Girls’ Hostel and we are planning to expand to other

buildings gradually.

112

6.4. Project laboratory (5) (Mention facilities & Utilization)

Facilities:

1) Computer Centre: - Computer center is equipped with 45 systems with internet facility and the

following licensed software are available

a) Staad. Pro

b) Staad foundation

c) Auto CAD

d) ARC GIS

e) ABACUS(Student Version)

f) VISSIM(Student Version)

Utilization:

1. Utilization of the project lab is monitored through a log register

2. Students use computer center for i) working on STAAD Pro, Arc GIS and other software for

their project work and also for ii) literature survey for the purpose of project works

3. Percentage utilization of lab is 56.9 i.e., 41nos of students out of 72nos students

2) The Geotechnical Engineering laboratory, Concrete Technology laboratory and Transportation

Engineering laboratory, Environmental Engineering laboratory and to some extent survey lab are also used

by students for their Project work.

6.5. Safety measures in laboratories (10)

1. Common safety measures

Following are the common safety measures adopted in all laboratories:

1) Operating instructions are displayed for all equipment

2) Students carry out the experiments only under the supervision of the faculty members and lab

technicians.

3) First aid box is available in case of unexpected events

4) The lab technicians are provided with training on how to use Fire extinguishers

In addition to the above, the safety measures are followed in individual laboratories are listed in Table 6.5

Table 6.5 Safety Measures in Laboratories.

S. No.

Name of the Laboratory Safety measures

1 Surveying Field Work 1. All the students should wear Caps, shoes, uniform &

apron

2 Geotechnical Engineering 1. All the students should wear uniform, aprons and shoes 2. Students are instructed in operating the equipment

safely

3 Concrete Technology 1. All the students should wear Aprons and Safety Shoes. 2. The lab is equipped with fire extinguisher. 3. MCB’s are provided for all equipments.

4 Environmental Engineering 1. All the students should wear Hand gloves, Aprons and

Safety Shoes.

2.

113

S. No.

Name of the Laboratory Safety measures

5 Transportation Engineering 1. All the students should wear Aprons and Safety Shoes. 2. The lab is equipped with fire extinguisher. 3. MCB’s are provided for all equipments.

6 Computer Application in Civil Engineering

1. UPS which supports 40 systems is provided in computer lab.

2. Checks for wiring and electrical installations for leakage and earthing

1. ANITS receives electric power from EPDCL through 3 phase 11 K.V. feeders. It is distributed at

440V, 3ø, using overhead lines and underground cables.

2. All overhead structures are earthed. All the panel boards are double earthed.

3. The earth points are tested once in 3 months and necessary maintenance is done. Rubber mats are

laid in front of all panel boards.

4. The electrical safety of all installations in the college is checked every year by the Dy. Electrical

Inspector of Govt. of A.P.

3. Fire-fighting arrangements:

Effective safety arrangements with emergency / multiple exist have been made and Fire -extinguishers

installed at all the laboratories, Class Rooms, Auditorium and seminars halls.

4. Safety of civil structure

All the buildings constructed at ANITS campus is followed as per the design requirements and the norms

specified by VUDA. Steel and concrete used in the construction are satisfactorily implemented.

5. Handling of hazardous chemicals and other such activities (2)

1. Sodium metal is handled with nickel spatula and stored in kerosene or paraffin wax medium

2. Phenols and Dilmethye Sulphate are handled with rubber gloves and are stored in dark -colored

bottles in a cool place.

3. Ether is always kept away from a flame and stored in a cool place and Benzol Chloride is handled

wearing a mask and is stored in air-tight vessels in a cool place.

6. Emergency Medical Care and First-aid

Anil Neerukonda Educational Society has been running a 300-bed hospital with about 12 specialist doctors

and excellent diagnostic and infrastructural facilities with an ambulance in the area adjoining ANITS

campus. This has been operational for the last 7 years and ANITS students and staff can avail themselves of

this facility.

114

CRITERION 7 Continuous Improvement 75

7. CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT (50)

7.1 Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of each of the POs & PSOs (30) POs (20)

The Set attainment level of 2 has been used to evaluate the action needed for each of the POs and PSOs. It

has been observed that all POs and PSOs for CAY, CAYm1 and CAYm2 have been attained with respect to

the Set attainment levels and hence no action is needed. However, action has been initiated in respect of

POs and PSOs, where the CO attainment levels are low and the same are presented in Table B.7.1 for the

last three academic years.

The Set PO/PSO Attainment level used is 2 for all POs/PSOs during the assessment period. Based on this, it was observed that all POs and PSOs have been attained for the program for all assessment years. However, courses where CO attainment level is low have been identified and the analysis and plan of action has been drafted and implemented. The details are given in Table B.7.1

Table B.7.1

CAY (2018-19)

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations

PO1: Engineering Knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.

PO1 2.0 2.05

1. Lack of understanding in technical terms and concepts (EG)

2. Students have been introduced to core subjects in civil engineering due to which they are finding difficulty to understand and analyse engineering problems. (SOM)

3. Basic knowledge of engineering fundamentals is not well understood. (EE-I)

4. Basic knowledge of analysis is not well understood. (FM-I)

5. Students find it difficult to solve Engineering Problems (SA-I)

6. Students have been introduced to core subjects in civil engineering due to which they are finding difficulty to understand and analyse engineering problems. (SS)

Action: 1. Emphasis upon technical terms and concepts in classes (EG) 2. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (SOM) 3. More problems will be given for practice (SOM) 4. Tutorials are to be conducted focusing engineering fundamentals (EE-I) 5. More problems will be given for practice (FM-I) 6. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (SA-I) 7. More problems will be given for practice (SA-I) 8. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals(SS) 9. More problems will be given for practice(SS)

115

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations

PO2: Problem Analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.

PO2 2.0 2.02

1. Practical importance of mix design is not understood (CT)

2. Lack of knowledge in analyzing complex problems in surveying (SUR-I, II)

3. Due to lack of basic knowledge in Environmental reforms (EE-I, II)


5. Hydraulic machines design problems are found to be more difficult for students to analyze (FM-II)

6. Students find it difficult to apply the concepts for problem analysis (SS)

Action: 1. Emphasis in classes upon Practical importance of Concrete and Mix Design (CT) 2. More Practical problems are focused upon (SUR-I, II) 3. More emphasis is given to clarify the concepts and its applications (EE-I, II) 4. Encouraged to develop their attitude in problem solving ability through tutorial classes (SA-I) 5. Additional classes to be conducted for the slow learners. (FM-II) 6. More number of numerical problems is to be discussed in tutorial classes. (FM-II) 7. More numericals to be dealt focusing upon concept and its utilization for problem analysis (SS)

PO3: Design/Development of Solution: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.

PO3 2.0 2.04

1. Students find it difficult to solve the Complex engineering problems (EM)

2. Students with poor communication skills were unable to understand the subject and are unable to communicate their doubts in classrooms. (SOM)

3. Deficiency in analyzing complex Engineering problems (SA-I)

4. Lack of understanding the importance of building drawings in Civil Engineering (BPD)

5. Lack of application of concepts to design (GTE-I) 6. Fundamental knowledge of the subject not

understood well (TE-I) 7. Deficiency in analyzing complex Design

Engineering problems (SS)

116

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations

Action: 1. Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. (EM) 2. More problems will be given for practice (EM) 3. Special classes beyond the college hours are conducted where in the faculty have cleared all

the doubts with one to one interaction. (SOM) 4. Advised to practice a greater number of complex problems by home assignments (SA-I) 5. Practical examples are delivered focusing importance of building drawing in Civil Engineering

(BPD) 6. Emphasis upon lectures with application of concepts to design (GTE-I) 7. Classes focused with imparting fundamentals (TE-I) 8. Advised to practice more number of complex problems by home assignments (SS)

PO4: Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems: Use research-based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.

PO4 2.0 2.05

1. Lack of understanding research importance (EG, CT)

2. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems (SOM)

3. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering

problems (EE-I, II)

4. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data from the given problem (SA-I, II)

5. Students found difficult to understand data interpretation (FM-I, II, WRE-II)

Action: 1. Classes focused with highlighting the importance of research related areas of civil engineering

(EG, CT) 2. More problems will be given for practice. (SOM) 3. More number of problems is being practiced in the class. (EE-I, II) 4. More problems will be given for practice. (SA-I, II) 5. Practical approach of teaching is adapted. (FM-I, II, WRE-II)

PO5: Modern Tool Usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.

PO5 2.0 2.10

1. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems (EE-I, II)

2. Lack of knowledge about usage of modern tools in drawing (BPD)

Action : 1. Students will be taken to Industrial Visit to understand the modern equipment usage in the

laboratory. (EE-I, II) 2. Students made to draw in AUTOCAD Software after completing the it on the Chart (BPD)

PO6: The Engineering and Society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.

117

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations

PO6 2.0 2.27

1. Less exposure to the real time CONTEXTUAL

problems (EE-I, II)

2. Lack of knowledge of the impact of engineering

solutions on environment and society (RCS-I)

3. Lack of understanding of societal importance of

massive civil engineering structures (TE-I, WRE-I)

Action: 1. Case studies representing the impact of certain engineering solutions adopted during

challenging projects are discussed during course work (EE-I, II, RCS-I) 2. Emphasis upon is societal importance is dealt in Classes (TE-I, WRE-I)

PO7: Environment and Sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.

PO7 2.0 2.07 1. Lack of knowledge on necessity of sustainable

solutions (EE-I, II)

Action 1: 1. Various Case studies with impact on environment have been discussed. (EE-I, II)

PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice.

PO8 2.0 2.22 1. Deficiencies not observed

Action: 1. No action needed

PO9: Individual and Team Work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.



PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.

PO10 2.0 2.28

1. Students lack the understanding how drawings need to communicate effectively in civil engineering areas. (BPD)

Action: 1. Emphasis in classes is laid upon the importance of communication through drawings in civil

engineering areas. (BPD)

118

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations

PO11: Project Management and Finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.


Action: 1. No action Needed

PO12: Life Long Learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and lifelong learning in the broadest context of technological change.

PO12 2.0 2.02

1. Less exposure to the real time societal problems (SOM)

2. Students found it to be difficult to get acquainted with the recent updates. (SA-I&II)

3. Less exposure to recent updates (EE-I, II) 4. Students found it to be difficult to get

acquainted with the recent updates. (RCS-I, TE-

I)

Action: 1. Using ICT facilities, such as PPTs, live demonstration of topic imparted using video lecture

(SOM) 2. Workshops and guest lectures are to be organized in order to make students aware of recent

technologies. (SA-I&II) 3. Workshops and Technical talks are conducted to make students aware of recent technologies

(EE-I, II) 4. Practical approach of teaching is to be adopted. (RCS-I, TE-I)

PSOs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations

PSO1: Civil Engineering Knowledge: Analyse & design solutions to complex problems by applying fundamentals of sciences and civil engineering in one or more of its major areas such as structural, geo-technical, water resources, transportation and environmental engineering.

PSO1 2.0 2.02



3. Students have been introduced to core subjects in civil engineering due to which they are finding difficulty to understand and analyse engineering problems. (SS)

4. Practical importance of mix design is not understood (CT)

119

Action: 1. More problems will be given for practice (FM-I) 2. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (SA-I) 3. More problems will be given for practice (SA-I) 4. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (SS) 5. More problems will be given for practice (SS) 6. Emphasis in classes upon Practical importance of Concrete and Mix Design (CT)

PSO2: Conduct investigations of complex civil engineering problems: Use modern techniques and tools to design and conduct experiments, prepare and interpret plans and reports with valid conclusions and recommendations.

PSO2 2.0 2.02

1. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering

problems (EE-I, II)

2. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data from the given problem (SA-I, II)

3. Students found difficult to understand data interpretation (FM-I, II, WRE-II)

4. Lack of knowledge about usage of modern tools in drawing (BPD)

Action: 1. More number of problems is being practiced in the class. (EE-I, II) 2. More problems will be given for practice. (SA-I, II) 3. Practical approach of teaching is adapted. (FM-I, II, WRE-II) 4. Students made to draw in AUTOCAD Software after completing the it on the Chart (BPD)

PSO3: Civil engineer and society: Develop civil engineering solutions based on societal, health, safety, legal, cultural and environmental considerations for sustainable development.

PSO3 2.0 2.17

1. Lack of knowledge of the impact of engineering solutions

on environment and society (RCS-I)

2. Lack of understanding of societal importance of massive

civil engineering structures (TE-I, WRE-I)

3. Lack of knowledge on necessity of sustainable solutions

(EE-I, II)

Action: 1. Case studies representing the impact of certain engineering solutions adopted during

challenging projects are discussed during course work (EE-I, II, RCS-I) 2. Emphasis upon is societal importance is dealt in Classes (TE-I, WRE-I) 3. Various Case studies with impact on environment have been discussed. (EE-I, II)

120

Table B.7.1

CAYm1 (2017-18)

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations


PO1 2.0 2.24

1. Students have been introduced to core subjects in civil engineering due to which they are finding difficulty to understand and analyse engineering problems. (SOM)

2. Lateral entry Students are not exposed to mathematical basic fundamental in those subjects. (FM-I)


4. Lateral entry Students are not exposed to mathematical basic fundamental in those subjects. (FM-I)


6. Students find it difficult to solve Engineering Problems (SA-II)

Action: 1. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals(SOM) 2. More problems will be given for practice(SOM) 3. Additional classes to be conducted to introduce Fluid mechanics fundamental concepts. (FM-I) 4. More emphasis on mathematical basics to be given in the previous semester (FM-I) 5. More problems will be given for practice (FM-I) 6. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (SA-II) 7. More problems will be given for practice (SA-II)


PO2 2.0 2.23

1. As the subject involves (SOM) mathematical calculations, some students with poor mathematics background found difficulty to solve numerical problems. (SOM)

2. Students find it difficult to solve Engineering Problems (SA-II)


Action: 1. More emphasis is given to clarify the concepts and its applications(SOM) 2. More classes on analysis to be taught in tutorial classes (SOM) 3. Encouraged to develop their attitude in problem solving ability through tutorial classes (SA-II) 4. Additional classes to be conducted for the slow learners. (FM-II) 5. More number of numerical problems is to be discussed in tutorial classes. (FM-II) 6. More problems will be given for practice. (FM-II)

121

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations


PO3 2.0 2.23

1. Students with poor communication skills were unable to understand the subject and are unable to communicate their doubts in classrooms. (SOM)

2. Deficiency in analyzing complex Engineering problems (SA-II)

3. Students found it difficult to apply the principles of Energy conservation in impact of jets (FM-II)

Action: 1. Special classes beyond the college hours are conducted where in the faculty has cleared all the

doubts with one to one interaction. (SOM) 2. Advised to practice more number of complex problems by home assignments (SA-II) 3. More emphasis on mathematical basic to be given in the previous course (FM-II) 4. Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. (FM-II)


PO4 2.0 2.27

1. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems (SOM)

2. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data from the given problem (SA-II)

3. Students found difficult to understand data interpretation for conducting dimensional analysis (FM-II)

Action: 1. More problems will be given for practice. (SOM) 2. More problems will be given for practice. (SA-II) 3. Practical approach of teaching is adapted. (FM-II)



Action 1: No action needed




122

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations











PO10 2.0 2.49 1. Students facing problems in expressing their

conceptual views (FM-II)

Action: 1. Student technical seminars to be conducted for enhancing their technical knowledge and

communication skills. (FM-II)



Action: No action needed


PO12 2.0 2.26 5. Less exposure to the real time societal problems (SOM) 6. Students found it to be difficult to get acquainted with

the recent updates. (SA-I&II)

123

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations

Action : 5. Using ICT facilities, such as PPTs, live demonstration of topic imparted using video lecture (SOM) 6. Workshops and guest lectures are to be organized in order to make students aware of recent

technologies. (SA-I&II)

PSOs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations


PSO1 2.0 2.23

1. Students find it difficult to solve & analyze complex Engineering Problems (SA-II)


Action : 1. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (SA-II) 2. More problems will be given for practice (SA-II) 3. Additional classes to be conducted for the slow learners. (FM-II) 4. More problems will be given for practice. (FM-II)


PSO2 2.0 2.34

1. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data from the given problem (SA-II)

2. Students found difficult to understand data interpretation for conducting dimensional analysis (FM-II)

Action : 1. More problems will be given for practice. (SA-II) 2. Practical approach of teaching is adapted. (FM-II)


PSO3 2.0 2.43 1. Deficiencies not observed

Action : No action needed

124

Table B.7.1

CAYm2 (2016-17)

POs Target Level Attainment Level

Observations


PO1 2.0 2.26

1. Students have been introduced to core subjects in civil engineering due to which they are finding difficulty to understand and analyse engineering problems. (SM)

2. Engineering Mechanics requires the strong foundation

of theoretical and practical knowledge of science and

mathematics, which the students study in their first

year, but student’s lags in correlating the theoretical

concepts with applications. (EM)

3. Students find it difficult to solve Engineering Problems (SA-III)

4. Students found it difficult to apply mathematical

integrations for solving complex engineering problems.

(APC)

5. Basic knowledge of engineering fundamentals is not well understood. (GIT)

Action: 1. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals(SM) 2. More problems will be given for practice (SM) 3. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (EM) 4. More problems will be given for practice (EM) 5. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (SA-III) 6. More problems will be given for practice (SA-III) 7. More number of problems are to be practiced. (APC) 8. Tutorials are to be conducted focusing engineering fundamentals. (GIT)


PO2 2.0 2.19

1. As the subject involves (SM) mathematical calculations, some students with poor mathematics background found difficulty to solve numerical problems. (SM)

2. Students find it difficult to solve Engineering Problems (SA-III)

3. Students find it difficult to apply theoretical concepts to practical problems (EM)

4. Students found it difficult to apply the basics of environmental sciences. (APC)

Action: 1. More emphasis is given to clarify the concepts and its applications(SM) 2. More classes on analysis to be taught in tutorial classes (SM) 3. Encouraged to develop their attitude in problem solving ability through tutorial classes (SA-III) 4. Video lectures on practical applications are shown in the class room (EM)

125


Observations

5. More emphasis is given to clarify the concepts and its applications (EM) 6. More classes on analysis to be taught in tutorial classes (EM) 7. Fundamentals of environmental sciences are to be taught in addition along with the present course.

(APC)


PO3 2.0 2.2

1. Students with poor communication skills were unable to understand the subject and are unable to communicate their doubts in classrooms. (SM)

2. Deficiency in analyzing complex Engineering problems (SA-III)

3. Students find it difficult to solve the Complex engineering problems (EM)

4. Students found it difficult to distinguish the stability

conditions of environment required to design stack

height. (APC)

5. Students find it difficult to correlate the effect of the

design solutions on public health, safety and

environment. (GIT)

Action: 1. Special classes beyond the college hours are conducted where in the faculty have cleared all the

doubts with one to one interaction. (SM) 2. Advised to practice more number of complex problems by home assignments (SA-III) 3. Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. (EM) 4. More problems will be given for practice (EM) 5. Additional classes to be conducted for the slow learners. (APC) 6. Practical approach of teaching to be adopted. (GIT)


PO4 2.0 2.21

1. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems (SM)

2. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data from the given problem (SA-III)

3. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems (APC)

4. Students found difficult to select suitable stabilization method based on data interpretation. (GIT)

5. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems (EM)

6. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data from the given problem (EM)

7. Subject involves both analysis and design (EM)

126


Observations

Action: 1. More problems will be given for practice. (SM) 2. More problems will be given for practice. (SA-III) 3. More number of problems is being practiced in the class. (APC) 4. Illustrative approach of teaching to be adopted. (GIT) 5. More emphasis is given to improve the interpretation of data from the given problem (EM)


POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations

PO5 2.0 2.35

1. Students found it difficult to get acquaintance with usage of modern construction equipment/material and their suitability (GIT)

2. Students found it difficult to understand the properties of pollution control design systems (APC)

Action:

1. Students are introduced to modern engineering equipment/material in construction through in -class

samples, industrial visits. (GIT)

2. Industrial and field visits are conducted for exposure to the usage of modern equipment. (APC)


PO6 2.0 2.39

1. Lack of knowledge of the impact of engineering

solutions on environment and society (GIT)

2. Less exposure to the real time societal problems (APC)

3. Less exposure to the real time CONTEXTUAL problems

(SA-III)

Action: 1. Case studies representing the impact of certain engineering solutions adopted during challenging

projects are discussed during course work. (GIT) 2. Workshops and Seminars addressed by the Professionals from Industry and Academics are

conducted for better understanding of the students. (APC) 3. Case studies representing the impact of certain engineering solutions adopted during challenging

projects are discussed during course work (SA-III)


127


Observations

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations

PO7 2.0 2.16 1. Lack of knowledge on necessity of sustainable solutions

(APC)

Action :

1. Various Case studies with impact on environment have been discussed. (APC)


POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations

PO8 2.0 2.33 1. Lack of knowledge in the importance conservation of

resources (APC)

Action:

1. Motivation towards usage of resources for the needs of future society. (APC)


PO9 2.0 2.81 1. Lack of analyzing skills in multidisciplinary subjects (SA-III)

Action: 2. Tutorials for solving more number of problems by forming a group (SA-III)


PO10 2.0 2.48 1. Student is unable to express and put forward his

knowledge in solving the engineering problems (SA-III)

Action: 1. More number of problems is to be solved. (SA-III)





128


Observations

PO12 2.0 2.28 1. Less exposure to the real time societal problems (SM) 2. Students found it to be difficult to get acquainted with

the recent updates. (SA-III) 3. Students found it to be difficult to get acquainted with

the recent updates. (GIT)

4. Less exposure to recent updates (APC)

Action : 1. Using ICT facilities, such as PPTs, live demonstration of topic imparted using video lecture (SM) 2. Workshops and guest lectures are to be organized in order to make students aware of recent

technologies. (SA-III) 3. Workshops and guest lectures are to be organized in order to make students aware of recent

technologies. (GIT) 4. Practical approach of teaching is to be adopted. (GIT) 5. Workshops and Technical talks are conducted to make students aware of recent technologies (APC)

PSOs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations


PSO1 2.0 2.21

1. Basic knowledge of engineering fundamentals is not well understood. (GIT)

2. Students found it difficult to apply mathematical integrations for solving complex engineering problems. (APC)

Action : 1. Tutorials are to be conducted focusing engineering fundamentals. (GIT) 2. More number of problems are to be practiced. (APC)


PSO2 2.0 2.28

1. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data from the given problem (SA-III)

2. Subject involves both analysis and design (EM) 3. Students found it difficult to get acquaintance with

usage of modern construction equipment/material and their suitability (GIT)

Action : 1. More problems will be given for practice. (SA-III) 2. More emphasis is given to improve the interpretation of data from the given problem (EM) 3. Students are introduced to modern engineering equipment/material in construction through

in-class samples, industrial visits. (GIT)


129

PSO3 2.0 2.28

1. Less exposure to the real time CONTEXTUAL problems

(SA-III)

2. Lack of knowledge on necessity of sustainable solutions

(APC)

Action : 1. Case studies representing the impact of certain engineering solutions adopted during

challenging projects are discussed during course work (SA-III) 2. Various Case studies with impact on environment have been discussed. (APC)

7.2. Academic Audit and actions taken thereof during the period of Assessment (10)

(Academic Audit system/process and its implementation in relation to Continuous Improvement)

Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) functioning under the auspices of NAAC conducts Academic Audit

every year for all Departments. The schedule of Academic Audit conducted during the assessment years is

given in Table B 7.2a

Table B 7.2a

S.

No.

Year Schedule of Academic Audit

1 CAY 2018-19 27-08-2018 to 28-08-2018

2 CAYm1 2017-18 09-08-2017 to 11-08-2017

3 CAYm2 2016-17 23-04-2016

The feedback and suggestions given during the Academic audit in each academic audit are incorporated to

prepare Action plan for subsequent year. Details of Action taken are shown in Table B 7.2b.

Table B 7.2b Action on Academic Audit

CAY 2018-19

S.

No.

Action on Academic Audit Faculty Coordinators

1 Feedback on course from Alumni and Recruiters Mr. T.V.Viswa Teja & Mr. Ch. Vineel

2 Feedback on course from Companies (Minimum 5

companies including core companies)

Mr. T.V.Viswa Teja & Mr. Ch. Vineel

3 Justification in writing for CO-PO Mapping Mr. T.V.Viswa Teja & Concerned

Faculty Member

4 Design Subjects with Higher learning Levels Concerned Faculty Member

5 Record of mentoring students with backlogs Mentors & Mr. J. Vikranth

6 Experiment wise viva questions Concerned Laboratory Faculty

Member

7 Rubrics for drawing or design subjects where student

is strong or weak

Concerned Faculty Member

130

S.

No.


8 Classification of projects into Best/ Average/ Below

Average Grades

Project Work Coordinator

9 Activities related to MoU’s Mr. Ch. Vineel, T&P Coordinator

10 CO- Question- Bloom’s level mapping for

assignments

Concerned Faculty Member


CAYm1 2017-18

S.

No.


1 More publications to be made student project work All faculty members

2 Provide more scope to students for self-learning Ch.Vineel, T&P Coordinator


CAYm2 2016-17

S.

No.

Actionable point Whether Action taken Faculty Coordinators

1 Remedial classes were conducted for

weak students but not recorded

Yes Class Teachers

7.3. Improvement in Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship (10)

Assessment is based on improvement in:

Placement: number, quality placement, core industry, pay packages etc.

Higher studies: performance in GATE, GRE, GMAT, CAT etc., and admissions in premier institutions

Entrepreneurs

Academic Year 2017-18

(CAYm1)

2016-17

(CAYm2)

2015-16

(CAYm3)

Number of Students Placed 15 22 30

Number of students pursuing Higher Studies 09 05 07

131

7.4. Improvement in the quality of students admitted to the program (10)

Assessment is based on improvement in terms of ranks/score in qualifying state level/national level

entrances tests, percentage marks in Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics in 12th Standard and

percentage marks of the lateral entry students.

Table B.7.4

Item CAY

2018-19

CAYm1

2017-18

CAYm2

2016-17 Name of the Entrance

Examination

National Level

Entrance

Examination

(Name of the

Entrance

Examination)

NA

No. of Students

admitted NA NA NA

Opening

Score/Rank NA NA NA

Closing

Score/Rank NA NA NA

State/University/

Level Entrance

Examination/other

s (Name of the

Entrance

Examination)

AP EAMCET

No. of Students

admitted 28 38 36

Opening

Score/Rank 9278 6807 9379

Closing

Score/Rank 1,26,386 1,36,519 1,16,410

Name of the

Entrance

Examination for

Lateral Entry or

Later entry details)

AP ECET

No. of Students

admitted 16 17 18

Opening

Score/Rank 16 57 42

Closing

Score/Rank 5527 4403 3986

Average CBSE/Any other Board Results of admitted students

(Physics, Chemistry & Maths)

88.02 92.55 92.67

132

CRITERION 8 First Year Academics 50

8. FIRST YEAR ACADEMICS (50)

8.1 First year student faculty ratio (FYSFR) (5)

Data for first year courses to calculate the FYSFR:

Table B 8.1

Year Number of students (approved intake strength)

Number of faculty members (considering fractional load)

FYSFR Assessment= (5*20)/FYSFR

CAY 2018-19

1080 61 17.7:1 5

CAYm1 2017-18

1080 64 16.8:1 5

CAYm2 2016-17

1020 60 17.0:1 5

Average Assessment 5

Assessment= (5*20)/ Average FYSFR (Limited to Max.5) 20 (5)

*Note: If FYSFR is greater than 25, then assessment equal to zero.

8.2 Qualification of faculty teaching First year common courses (5)

Assessment of qualification= (5x+3y)/RF, where

X = Number of faculty members with PhD

Y= Number of faculty members with Post-graduate qualification

RF= Number faculty member required as per SFR of 15:1,

Faculty definition as defined in 5.1

Table B.8.2

Year X Y RF Assessment of faculty

qualification

CAY 2018-19

22 39 54 4.20

CAY m1 2017-18

23 41 54 4.22

CAYm2 2016-17

22 38 51 4.39

Average assessment of faculty qualification

4.27

133

8.3 First Year Academic Performance (10)

Academic Performance = (Mean of 1st year grade point average of all successful students on a 10 point

scale) or (mean of % of marks in first year of all successful students/10) (no.of successful

students/number of students appeared in the examinations)

Successful students those who are permitted to proceed to the second year

Year Average of GPA of Successful Students Average Marks

ECE EEE MECH IT CSE CIVIL CHEM

2018-19 8.26 8.06 8.14 8.09 8.30 7.97 7.82 8.08 8.08

CAYm1 2017-18

8.267 7.966 7.831 8.051 8.124 7.738 8.051 8.00 8.00

CAYm2 2016-17

8.321 7.925 7.953 8.076 8.198 7.694 7.812 7.99 7.99

Average Marks 8.02

8.4. Attainment of Course Outcomes of first year courses - (10)

8.4.1. Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of Course

Outcomes of first year is done (5)

8.4. Attainment of Course Outcomes of first year courses - 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 (10)

8.4.1. Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of Course

Outcomes of first year is done (5)

The performance of a student in the first year theory as well as lab courses shall be evaluated to the

maximum of 100 marks in each course. The assessment is for 40 marks through internal evaluation and 60

marks through external evaluation in theory and 50 marks through internal and 50 marks through external

evaluation in labs.

Internal Evaluation for Theory:

According to the scheme notified by the department at the beginning of the year, the faculty awards 20

out of 40 sessional marks through continuous assessment which includes class tests, assignments and

attendance. The rest of the 20 marks are awarded by considering the average of 2 midterm examinations

conducted as per the schedule.

Internal Evaluation for Lab:

As per the scheme notified by the department concerned at the beginning of the year, the lab internal

evaluation is assessed for 50 marks which include continuous assessment as well as viva voce, record

submission and internal lab examination at the end of the first year course work.

The course outcomes (COs) of all first year courses is recorded and the attainment levels of those COs are

evaluated by noting the performance of each student in the midterm examinations and continuous

134

evaluation (assignments, class tests, laboratory tests). The class mean is taken as reference mark and the

attainment levels are based how many students have scored above the mean as given below.

Table-1.0

Percentage range of students scoring above mean

Assessment Scale COs attainment level

75 above High 3

60-75 Medium 2

40-60 Low 1

External evaluation of semester end examinations (2015-16):

For the determination of attainment levels of external evaluation, two parameters are set -

1. Overall Pass percentage of the course in the semester end examinations.

2. Percentage of ‘O’, ‘A+’ and ‘A’ grades of the course in the semester end exams. The attainment levels

of overall pass percentage of students in the semester end examinations are considered as shown

below: Table-1.1

Pass percentage range Assessment Scale COs attainment level

75 above High 3

55-75 Medium 2

40-55 Low 1

The attainment levels of percentage of O’ A+ and ‘A’ grades of the course in the Semester end

examinations are indicated as shown below: Table-1.2

% of ‘O’ A+ and ‘A’ grades Assessment Scale COs attainment level

35 & above High 3

20-35 Medium 2

10-20 Low 1

Out of five marks allotted for the attainment of Course Outcomes of all first year courses (8.4.2) 2 marks

are allotted for internal assessment and 3 marks for the attainment level of Semester end exams.

The percentage attainment levels of the internal assessment of each first year course are noted. Points are

marked for these attainment levels (as per table-1.1). The average of these points is converted into marks

by dividing it with the maximum points (03) and multiplying with the internal assessment marks- 2. Points

are allotted for the semester end examinations pass percentage in individual courses and ‘O’, ‘A+’ &’A’

grades (as per table-1.2). The average of the points of semester end pass percentage and ‘O’, ‘A+’ &’A’

grades is converted into marks by dividing it with the maximum points (03) and multiplying with the

Semester end examination marks -3.

135

External evaluation of semester end examinations (2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19):

For the evaluation of CO attainment levels of external evaluation is revised under autonomous system and

the following criteria was adopted.

The performance of a student in the semester end examinations was evaluated to the maximum of 60

marks in each course. The class mean is taken as reference mark and the attainment levels are based how

many students have scored above the mean is considered on a 3 point scale as given below.

Table-1.3

Percentage range of students scoring above mean

Assessment Scale COs attainment level

75 above High 3

55-75 Medium 2

40-55 Low 1

The weightage given for internal assessment and external end examinations is 2:3. Then the attainment of

course outcome for the entire class is taken by considering the average of all students in a class. The same

procedure is followed for each course /subject.

8.4.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all first year courses (5) Program shall have set attainment levels for all first year courses.

(The attainment levels shall be set considering average performance levels in the university examination or any higher value set as target for the assessment years. Attainment level is to be measured in terms of student performance in internal assessments with respect the COs of a subject plus the performance in the University examination)

Refer to 3.2.2 for further details

The Record of attainment of COs for all first year courses is given in Annexure-16 for the CAY 2018-19.

8.5. Attainment of Program Outcomes from first year courses (20)

8.5.1. Indicate results of evaluation of each relevant PO and/or PSO, if applicable (15) The relevant program outcomes that are to be addressed at first year need to be identified by the institution.

Program Outcome attainment levels shall be set for all relevant POs and/or PSOs through first year courses.

(Describe the assessment processes that demonstrate the degree to which the Program Outcomes are attained through first year courses and document the attainment levels. Also include information on assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of each Program Outcome is based indicating the frequency with which these processes are carried out)

Following are the assessment tools used for measuring the attainment of POs and PSOs based on direct assessment.

1) For a given PO, Calculate the attainment level for each course, considering the COs which map with this PO.

2) For example, consider PO2 and Course CIV111, the attainment levels of the COs for this

136

course and the correlation levels with PO2 are shown below

Course CIV111, English in I Year I Semester CAYm1 2017-18

CO Attainment

level

Correlation level

with PO1

CIV111.1 2.6 2

CIV111.2 2 -

CIV111.3 1.4 -

CIV111.4 2.6 -

CIV111.5 2 -

3) To determine the Attainment level for PO2 from this course, the CO attainment level for each CO is multiplied with the corresponding Correlation levels. Their sum is then divided with the sum of the correlation levels. Only the COs (CIV111.1) which correlate with the PO (PO2) are considered in the calculation. Hence attainment level for PO2, for this Course is obtained as

4) The attainment levels for PO2, is determined for all other courses in a similar manner.

5) The average of the attainment levels from all courses obtained in Step3 is then determined for the PO, considering the courses which correlate to the PO2.

6) Similarly, the attainment levels for all POs/PSOs are determined following above steps and the results for CAY, CAYm1 and CAYm2 are shown in Table B 8.5.1.

137

TABLE B 8.5.1 COURSE – PO/PSO ATTAINMENT FOR FIRST YEAR COURSES

CAY 2018-19

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3

CIV111 English 1.60 1.60 1.62 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.62


CIV113 Engineering Physics 1.08 1.08 0.93 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.21 1.30 1.30 0.80 0.87 0.80





CIV118 Workshop 2.80 2.60 2.80 2.60







CIV127 Language Lab 2.00 1.80 1.80 1.80 2.00 1.80


138


CAYm1 2017-18

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3

CIV111 English 2.60 2.30 2.12 2.00 2.00 2.60 2.12







CIV118 Workshop 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00







CIV127 Language Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00


139


CAYm2 2016-17

Course PO PSO

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3

CIV111 English 2.60 2.30 2.00 2.00 2.60 2.00







CIV118 Workshop 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00







CIV127 Language Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00


140

8.5.2. Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of relevant POs (5) (The attainment levels by direct (student performance) are to be presented through Program level Course-PO matrix as indicated)

Action has been initiated for POs and PSOs where the attainment level is less than 2.0 and the same is

presented in Table B 8.5.2

Table B.8.5.2

CAY (2018-19)

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations


PO1 2.0 2.05

1. Lack of basics in integration concepts. (EM-I) 2. Lack of fundamental knowledge related to subject. (EP) 3. Students found it difficult to visualize isometric

projections. (ED) 4. Lack of fundamental science knowledge related to

subject. (ES) 5. Basic knowledge of analysis is not well understood.

Students find it difficult to solve Engineering Problems (MC) (EM-II) Lack of basic fundamentals in chemistry (EC)

Action: 1. More problems will be given for practice (EM-I) 2. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (EP) 3. 3D graphics to be shown to the students for better understanding of isometric projections. (ED) 4. Tutorial classes to be conducted. (ES) 5. More emphasis on mathematical basics to be given in the previous semester (MC) (EM-II) 6. More emphasis on basics to be taught during class work (EC)


PO2 2.0 2.02

1. Students with poor mathematics background found difficulty to solve numerical problems. (EM-I)

2. Students lack ability to solve complex engineering problems.(EP)

3. Absence of understanding the importance in natural sciences in problem analysis.(ES)

4. Students with poor mathematics background found difficulty to solve numerical problems. (MC) (EM-II) Students facing difficult in Correlating the chemical related data to solve problems (EC)

141

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations

Action: 1. Additional classes conducted for the slow learners. (EM-I) 2. More number of numerical problems is to be discussed in tutorial classes. (EP) 3. Emphasis upon correlative lectures. (ES) 4. More problems will be given for practice on relevant topic. (EM-II) 5. More number of numerical problems is to be discussed in tutorial classes. (EC) 6. More emphasis is given to clarify the concepts and its applications(MC)


PO3 2.0 2.04 1. Students find difficult in projection of solids. (ED)

Action: 1. Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. (ED)


PO4 2.0 2.05

1. Students lack knowledge in designing of experiments and interpretation of data. (EP)

2. Deficiencies not observed. (ES) 3. Student facing Difficulty in interpreting data (EC) 4. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data

from the given problem (MC)

Action: 1. Practical approach of teaching is adapted. (EP) 2. Emphasis on problems during class work (EC) 3. More problems will be given for practice. (MC)


PO5 2.0 2.10

1. Students find it difficult to find correlation between basic mathematical principles and modeling. (EM-I)

2. As the subject involves complex Mathematical calculations, some students with poor mathematics background found difficulty to solve numerical problems. (MC)

Action 1: 1. Emphasis upon lectures correlating basic principles and modeling. (EM-I)

2. More classes on analysis to be taught in tutorial classes (MC)


PO6 2.0 2.27 1. Students found deficient to assess societal and

consequent responsibilities related to subject. (ES)

142

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations

Action 1: 1. Emphasis upon lectures consisting case studies. (ES)


PO7 2.0 2.07 1. Student find it difficult to correlate fundamentals of

chemistry to the natural environment (EC)

Action 1: 1. More emphasis on creating awareness to natural environment (EC)


PO8 2.0 2.22 Deficiencies not observed

Action: No action Needed












143

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations


PSOs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations


PSO1 2.0 2.02

1. Students found it difficult to differentiate horizontal planes and vertical planes. (ED)

2. Students lack fundamental engineering knowledge concerned to subject.(ES)

3. Students were lacking in basic formulas of mathematics (EM-II)

Action : 1. More number of numerical problems is to be discussed in tutorial classes. (EP) 2. Emphasis upon correlative lectures. (ES) 3. More problems will be given for practice on relevant topic. (EM-II)


PSO2 2.0 2.02


4. Student facing Difficulty in interpreting data (EC) 5. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data

from the given problem (MC) 6. Students find it difficult to find correlation between

basic mathematical principles and concerned modern tools. (EM-I)

Action : 3. Practical approach of teaching is adapted. (EP) 4. Emphasis on problems during class work (EC) 5. More problems will be given for practice. (MC) 6. Emphasis upon lectures correlating basic principles and modern tools. (EM-I)


PSO3 2.0 2.17 1. Student find it difficult to correlate fundamentals of


Action : 1. More emphasis on creating awareness to natural environment (EC)

144

Table B.8.5.2

CAYm1 (2017-18)

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations


PO1 2.0 1.86

6. Lack of basics in integration concepts. (EM-I) 7. Lack of fundamental knowledge related to subject. (EP) 8. Students found it difficult to visualize isometric

projections.(ED) 9. Lack of fundamental science knowledge related to

subject. (ES) 10. Basic knowledge of analysis is not well understood.

Students find it difficult to solve Engineering Problems (MC) (EM-II)

11. Lack of basic fundamentals in chemistry (EC)

Action: 7. More problems will be given for practice(EM-I) 8. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (EP) 9. 3D graphics to be shown to the students for better understanding of isometric projections. (ED) 10. Tutorial classes to be conducted. (ES) 11. More emphasis on mathematical basics to be given in the previous semester (MC) (EM-II) 12. More emphasis on basics to be taught during class work (EC)


PO2 2.0 1.7

1. Students lack ability to solve complex engineering problems. (EM-I)

2. Students lack ability to formulate problem analysis using the first principles.(EP)

3. Students finding difficult to adopt new concepts like Laplace transforms (EM-II)

4. Students facing difficult in Correlating the chemical related data to solve problems (EC)


Action: 1. Additional classes to be conducted for the slow learners. (EM-I) 2. More problems will be given for practice. (EP) 3. More problems will be given for practice on relevant topic. (EM-II) 4. More number of numerical problems is to be discussed in tutorial classes. (EC) 5. More emphasis is given to clarify the concepts and its applications(MC)


145

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations

PO3 2.0 1.48 1. Students with poor communication skills were unable

to understand the subject and are unable to communicate their doubts in classrooms. (ED)

Action: 1. Special classes beyond the college hours are conducted where in the faculty has cleared all the

doubts with one to one interaction. (ED)


PO4 2.0 1.93


6. Deficiencies not observed.(ES) 7. Student facing Difficulty in interpreting data (EC) 8. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data

from the given problem (MC)

Action: 4. Practical approach of teaching is adapted. (EP) 5. Emphasis on problems during class work (EC) 6. More problems will be given for practice. (MC)


PO5 2.0 1.94

1. Students find it difficult to find correlation between basic mathematical principles and concerned modern tools. (EM-I)

2. Deficiencies not found (EC) (EM-II) 3. As the subject involves complex Mathematical

calculations, some students with poor mathematics background found difficulty to solve numerical problems. (MC)

Action 1: 1. Emphasis upon lectures correlating basic principles and modern tools. (EM-I) 2. More classes on analysis to be taught in tutorial classes (MC)


PO6 2.0 1.96 1. Students found deficient to assess societal and

consequent responsibilities related to subject.(ES)

Action 1: Emphasis upon lectures consisting case studies.(ES)


146

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations

PO7 2.0 1.81

1. Lack the ability to correlate sustainability concepts and subject context. (ES)

2. Student find it difficult to correlate fundamentals of chemistry to the natural environment.(EC)

Action 1: 1. Emphasis upon correlative lectures. (ES) 2. More emphasis on creating awareness to natural environment.(EC)


PO8 2.0 1.81 1. Lack of ability to write effective report on conceptual

views. (EP) 2. Lack of ability to make effective drawings. (ED)

Action: 1. Group activities to be conducted and report has to be submitted on the topic. (EP) 2. Suggesting students to follow online courses on engineering drawing.(ED)


PO9 2.0 2.8

Action:





PO11 2.0 1.7 1. Students found deficit in correlating ethics to management

principles and finance

Action: 1. Emphasis upon lectures with case studies correlating ethics to management



147

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations


PSOs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations


PSO1 2.0 1.68

1. Lack of basics in integration concepts. (EM-I)

2. Students found it difficult to visualize isometric

projections. (ED)

3. Basic knowledge of analysis is not well understood. Students find it difficult to solve Engineering Problems (MC) (EM-II)

4. Students with poor communication skills were unable to understand the subject and are unable to communicate their doubts in classrooms. (ED)

Action : 5. More problems will be given for practice (EM-I) 6. 3D graphics to be shown to the students for better understanding of isometric projections. (ED) 7. More emphasis on mathematical basics to be given in the previous semester (MC) (EM-II) 8. Special classes beyond the college hours are conducted where in the faculty has cleared all the

doubts with one to one interaction. (ED)


PSO2 2.0 1.93


8. Student facing Difficulty in interpreting data (EC) 9. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data

from the given problem (MC) 10. Students find it difficult to find correlation between

basic mathematical principles and concerned modern tools. (EM-I)

Action : 7. Practical approach of teaching is adapted. (EP) 8. Emphasis on problems during class work (EC) 9. More problems will be given for practice. (MC) 10. Emphasis upon lectures correlating basic principles and modern tools. (EM-I)


148

PSO3 2.0 1.89

2. Lack the ability to correlate sustainability concepts and subject context. (ES)

3. Student find it difficult to correlate fundamentals of chemistry to the natural environment. (EC)

Action : 1. Emphasis upon correlative lectures. (ES) 2. More emphasis on creating awareness to natural environment. (EC)

Table B 8.5.2

CAYm2 (2016-17)

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations


PO1 2.0 1.85

1. Student found difficulty in understanding three dimensional analytical geometry. (EM-I)

2. Lack of knowledge in fundamentals of thermodynamics and quantum mechanics.(EP)




6. Lack of basic concepts in chemistry (EC) 7. Students find it difficult to solve Engineering

Problems (MC)

Action: 1. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals(EM-I) 2. Emphasis upon lectures focusing thermodynamics and quantum mechanics. (EP) 3. More number of tutorials conducted.(ED & ES) 4. More emphasis on mathematical basics during class work (MC) (EM-II) 5. More emphasis on basics to be taught during class work (EC)


PO2 2.0 1.67

5. Students with poor mathematics background found difficulty to solve numerical problems. (EM-I)

6. Students lack ability to solve complex engineering problems.(EP)

7. Absence of understanding the importance in natural sciences in problem analysis.(ES)

8. Students with poor mathematics background found difficulty to solve numerical problems. (MC) (EM-II)

9. Students facing difficult in Correlating the chemical related data to solve problems (EC)

149

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations

Action: 7. Additional classes conducted for the slow learners. (EM-I) 8. More number of numerical problems is to be discussed in tutorial classes. (EP) 9. Emphasis upon correlative lectures. (ES) 10. More problems will be given for practice on relevant topic. (EM-II) 11. More number of numerical problems is to be discussed in tutorial classes. (EC) 12. More emphasis is given to clarify the concepts and its applications(MC)


PO3 2.0 1.83 2. Students find difficult in projection of

solids.(ED) 3. Deficiencies not found.(ES)

Action: 2. Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. (ED)


PO4 2.0 2.09 1. Deficiencies not observed.

Action: 1. No Action needed


PO5 2.0 1.89

3. Students find it difficult to find correlation between basic mathematical principles and modeling. (EM-I)


Action 1: 3. Emphasis upon lectures correlating basic principles and modeling. (EM-I) 4. More classes on analysis to be taught in tutorial classes (MC)


PO6 2.0 2.06 1. Deficiencies not found

150

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations

Action 1: No action needed.


PO7 2.0 1.79 1. Student find it difficult to correlate

fundamentals of chemistry to the natural environment (EC)

Action 1: 1. More emphasis on creating awareness to natural environment (EC)








PO10 2.0 2.35 1. Deficiency not observed.

Action: 1. No action needed.





151

POs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations



PSOs Target Level

Attainment Level

Observations


PSO1 2.0 1.78




Action : 4. More number of numerical problems is to be discussed in tutorial classes. (EP) 5. Emphasis upon correlative lectures. (ES) 6. More problems will be given for practice on relevant topic. (EM-II)


PSO2 2.0 2.0 Deficiencies not observed



PSO3 2.0 1.92 2. Student find it difficult to correlate fundamentals of


Action : 2. More emphasis on creating awareness to natural environment (EC)

152

CRITERION 9 Student Support Systems 50

9. STUDENT SUPPORT SYSTEMS (50) 9.1 Mentoring system to help at individual level (5)

Type of mentoring: Professional guidance/career advancement/course work specific/ laboratory specific/all-round development. Number of faculty mentors: Number of students per mentor: Frequency of meeting: (The institution may report the details of the mentoring system that has been developed for the students for various purposes and also state the efficacy of such system)

About 12 students are allotted to a faculty member acting as a mentor. The details of mentoring

(counselling ) batches for the academic year 2016-17 for III Year – II Semester is shown in Annexure-17.

Following are the important features of the mentoring system developed for students

1. Students are provided with separate slots for counseling/Mentoring within the timetable for

professional guidance and career advancement. In this session the faculty member interacts with

his/her counseling batch consisting of 12 students individually. The mentor will call the students

once in week as per the schedule depending on the need and purpose.

2. The record of counselling and mentoring is maintained in proctors file, which is updated on regular

basis.

3. The student will be counseled in the presence of the parent by the mentor, class teacher and the

HoD/Principal.

4. Interaction hours are scheduled every week beyond the college hours were the faculty member

are available to the students in the department for 3:20pm to 5:00pm for course work specific

mentoring. During this interaction students are encouraged and mentored in different course work

laboratories

9.2. Feedback analysis and reward /corrective measures taken, if any (10)

(Feedback collected for all courses: YES/NO; Specify the feedback collection process; Average Percentage of students who participate; Specify the feedback analysis process; Basis of reward/ corrective measures, if any; Indices used for measuring quality of teaching & learning and summary of the index values for all courses/teachers; Number of corrective actions taken.)

✓ Feedback collected for all courses: Yes/No

1. Feedback collection process

a. The feedback is collected twice in a semester before each Mid examination from students

having minimum attendance of 75 percentage at that time.

b. Feedback collection process is completely anonymous as it is done using online system in

the absence of the concerned faculty members. Hence the students can give free and fair

feedback.

2. Average percentage of students who participate:% based on eligible number of students having

minimum 75% attendance as on the date of collection of feedback.

153

Year / Sem % of students who participate in the feedback

CAY (%)

(2018-19)

CAYm1 (%)

(2017-18)

CAYm2 (%)

(2016-17)

II – I 73.77 89.5 83.8

III – I 83.33 96.9 85.7

IV – I 95.23 71.4 100

Average 84.11 85.9 89.8

II – II 41.17 73.4 95.2

III – II 74.14 85.7 93.7

IV – II 80.30 56.0 96.3

Average 65.20 71.1 95.0

3. Feedback Analysis process

a) Sample feedback form is enclosed in Annexure-18 which shows that there are a total of 15

teaching – learning characteristics on which the feedback from the students is collected online

with such ratings as very good, good, average, below average or poor.

b) The number of students marking each rating (such as very good) is counted for each

characteristic and the percentage is calculated. By giving a rating as given in Table-9.1, the

feedback is evaluated for a maximum marks of five for each characteristic

Table 9.1: Feedback Evaluation

S. No

Percentage Classification

1 <60% Very poor

2 60% - 69% Poor (To improve a lot)

3 70% - 79% O.K (To improve)

4 80% - 84% Good

5 85% - 94% Very good

6 >95% Excellent

c) Example: -

i) The first characteristic (Knowledge of subject) is given the following ratings for the subject

mechanics of solids II Year – I Semester in the year 2015-16 taken on date 02-09-2015

Rating Calculation Scale

Very Good (22/54) x100 = 40.74% 5

Good (21/54) x100 = 38.89% 4

Average (8/54)x100 = 14.81% 3

Below Average (1/54) x100 = 1.85% 2

154

Poor (2/54) x100 = 3.7% 1

The ratings for other characteristic are calculated in a similar way.

ii. The marks obtained for the first characteristic are therefore equal to

5x0.4074+4x0.3889+3x0.1481+2x0.0185+1x0.037 = 4.14

iii. The total marks obtained for all the 15 characteristic are equal to 63.04

The percentage feedback for this subject mechanics of solids is therefore equal to 63.04/

(5x15) x 100 = 84.05%

iv. The percentage of feedback obtained in any subject is classified into the following

categories

4. Basis of reward/corrective measures

Rewards:

a. The feedback report is given to the faculty member with appropriate remarks from the

principal depending upon the percentage of feedback he/she receives. “I congratulate you

on this achievement and appreciate your positive contribution. They are also further

advised to keep up the good work and continue to strive to excel reminding that there is

always a room to further excel”

b. The feedback is given a weight age of 10 out of 100 in the annual performance appraisal of

the faculty members. For faculty members with less than two years experience feedback

percentage given a weightage of 15 out of 100. The annual increment for the faculty

members is given considering feedback in performance appraisal.

c. The faculty members with less than two years experience, when they score excellent

feedback are personally congratulated by the principal.

Corrective measures:

a. Where the feedback obtained for a faculty member in any subject is not satisfactory such

as less than 60% out of 100% the faculty member is informed in writing and cautioned

b. The faculty member will be suggested to focus and improve teaching learning

characteristics for which the feedback obtained is less than 4 out of 5 Poitnts.

c. Where required the head of the department will ask the concerned faculty member to give

practice class in the presence of HoD and subject expert. The teaching learning skills and

subject preparation of the faculty members are evaluated critically during the practice

class and necessary suggestions for improvement are offered.

d. The concerned faculty member is monitored on a regular basis until there is adequate

improvement in the teaching learning as well as the feedback.

e. After adequate time is given to faculty member to work for improvement and incase there is no satisfactory progress or improvement in the faculty members, necessary action is taken including retrenchment from service.

5. Indices

Following are the indices used for measuring quality of teaching and learning

155

Student’s feedback – teaching learning characteristics

S. No

Characteristics

1 Knowledge of The Subject

2 Coming Well Prepared For The Class

3 Giving Clear Explanations

4 Command Of Language

5 Clear And Audible Voice

6 Holding The Attention Of The Students Through The Class

7 Providing More Matter Than In The Text Books

8 Capability To Clear The Doubts Of The Students

9 Encourage Students To Ask Questions And To Participate In Discussions

10 Appreciating Students As And When Deserving

11 Willingness To Help Even Out Of The Class

12 Return Of Valued Test Papers / Records In Time

13 Punctuality And Following Timetable Schedule

14 Coverage Of Syllabus

15 Impartiality ( Treating Of All Students Alike)

6. Number of corrective actions taken

S. No

Academic Year

Year / Semester

Subject Name of the

faculty Corrective

action Impact Analysis

1 CAY

2018-19 - - - - -

2 CAYm1 2017-18

- - - - -

3 CAYm2 2016-17

- - - - -

4 CAYm3 2015-16

II-I Mechanics of solids

(MOS) Mr. K Lovaraju

MOS Practice class

Some improvement

in MOS

II-II Structural Analysis – I

(SA-I) Mr. K Lovaraju

SA-I Practice class

No Improvement.

Faculty was replaced

9.3. Feedback on facilities (5)

Assessment is based on student feedback collection, analysis and corrective action taken.

Feedback form on facilities is given in Table B 9.3. Overall feedback is satisfactory.

Corrective Actions taken

1) Installation of Moodles for learning beyond college hours 2) Upgradation of gymnasium 3) Air-conditioned bus facility 4) Upgradation of Cricket ground with practice net 5) Basket ball court

156

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

Feedback on Facilities

Date:

S.No. Name of Facility Available?

Yes/No

Feedback on the facility

1 2 3

1 Library

i) Books

ii) Journals

iii) NPTEL facility

iv) Department Library

v) Availability beyond College hours

2 Faculty members beyond College hours

3 A/c College Bus

4 Laboratories beyond College hours

i) Computer Centre

ii) Other Labs

5 LAN and Internet

6 Moodles

7 Games and Sports, facilities

a) outdoor games

i) Cricket ground with practice net

ii) Volley ball court

iii) Ball badminton court

b) Indoor games

i) Table Tennis

ii) Chess

iii) Caroms

8 Well-equipped gymnasium

9 Electricity: 11 K.V/415V substation

10 Power backup: 250 KVA, 125 KVA and

20KVA standby diesel generators

11 Water supply

i) RO Drinking water

ii) Bore water

12 Counseling

13 Emergency Medical Care

300-bed ANIMS hospital

14 First-aid

1: Poor 2: Satisfactory 3: Exemplary

Additional facilities needed, if any:

Suggestions if any:

157

9.4. Self-Learning (5) (The institution needs to specify the facilities, materials and scope for self-learning / learning beyond syllabus, Webinars, Podcast, MOOCs etc. and evaluate their effectiveness) Facility:

1. Digital library. 2. Wi-Fi connectivity to student laptops.

Materials:

ASCE journals, E- books, NPTEL courses and various other MOOCs. Scope for self-learning / learning beyond the syllabus: Students can enhance their knowledge by self-learning / learning beyond syllabus by the following avenues:

1) Use digital library and browse international journals (ASCE) & e-books. 2) Use institute provided access to ASCE journals through their laptop internet connectivity

within and outside the institute premises. 3) Use NPTEL, other MOOCs and materials. 4) Presenting in weekly student seminars. 5) Guest lectures by industry experts. 6) Assignments.

9.5. Career Guidance, Training, Placement (10) (The institution may specify the facility, its management and its effectiveness for career guidance including counseling for higher studies, campus placement support, industry interaction for training/internship/placement, etc.)

Following are the facilities/avenues provided to the students by the training and placement cell. 1. Campus Recruitment Training (CRT) classes for 3 rd year students during summer vacation at the

end of 3rd year and during 4th year 1st semester and also before every important campus placement.

2. Training in Quantitative Aptitude (Q.A.) and Verbal Aptitude (V.A.) during 3 rd year 1st semester and 3rd year 2nd semester, as part of time table along with regular class work.

3. Online practice tests are conducted before and after the training. 4. A Number of guest lectures are organized for career guidance and counseling of students. 5. Career guidance and counseling is also provided by the Head of the Department, Dean of

training and placement and principal at regular intervals. 6. Career guidance and counseling is provided by faculty members who are counselors for

students. 7. Campus placements are arranged by the dean of training and placement and his office by

liaisoning with various industries. 9.6. Entrepreneurship Cell (5) (The institution may describe the facility, its management and its effectiveness in encouraging

entrepreneurship and incubation) (Success stories for each of the assessment years are to be mentioned)

HOD and Faculty members as well as Principal and Management motivate and guide students towards the

large potential for entrepreneurship in civil engineering. Students join industry to gain initial experience and become entrepreneurs in due course. The Entrepreneurship development cell organizes regular

programs to motive the students to become entrepreneurs is coordinated by the Mechanical Department. Various programs organized by the EDC cell as shown in Table 9.6. However, it takes some lean period before the students gain some experience and venture entrepreneurship.

158

Table 9.6 Interaction Sessions Organized

CAY (2018-19)

S. No

Date-Month-Year Resource person with designation % of Stude

nts

1 10-08-2018 Mr.Vamsi, Director Global Edge 100

2 29-12-2018 Dr. G L Siva Kumar Babu, Professor of Civil Engg., I.I.Sc. Bengaluru

65

3 29-12-2018 Dr. A Santharam, Adjunct Professor, ANITS

65

4 29-12-2018 Prof.C.N.V.Satyanarayana Reddy, Professor of Civil Engg., Andhra University

65

5 29-12-2018 Sri Srinivasa Raju, CEO, Geomardy, Visakhapatnam

65

6 29-12-2018 Sri. Madan Kumar Annam, Head of Engineering, Keller India, Chennai

65

7 13-07-2018 Dr.T.V.Praveen, Professor A.U. College of Engineering, Andhra University

60

8 19-11-2018

to 22-11-2018

Kasi Viswanatham Ponnapalli IIC Academy

66

9 19-11-2018 to

22-11-2018 Srikanth Ankam IIC Academy

66

Interaction Sessions Organized CAYm1 (2017-18)

S. No

Date-Month-Year

Resource person with designation % of Students

1 15-09-2017 Dr. A. Santha Ram, Senior Mining Geologist, (Retd.), Indian Bureau of Mines

84

2 11-10-2017 Sri. A K Mehera, Chief Engineer, Visakhapatnam Port Trust

59

3 11-10-2017 Dr. V Venkateswara Rao, Professor (Retd), Andhra University

59

4 11-10-2017 Sri. Rishi Jaiswal, Scientist-D, DRDO, Visakhapatnam

59

5 11-10-2017 Prof. C N V Suryanarayana Reddy, Andhra University

59

6 24-10-2017 Ravi Lakshmi Narayana, Environmental Engineer, A.P.Pollution Control Board, Visakhapatnam

100

7 28-04-2018 Bharath Paladugu, Director, Himma International Academy

100

159

Interaction Sessions Organized

CAY (2016-17)

S. No

Date-Month-Year Resource person with designation % of Students

1 09-07-2016 Sri. D K Visweswara Rao Chief Engineer, CRDA, Amaravathi

67

2 15-07-2016 Sri. R Nageswara Rao, Superintending Engineer, Water Resource Circle, Visakhapatnam

84

3 01-10-2016 Dr. Sivakumar Babu, Professor, Civil Engg, I.I.Sc., Bangalore

100

160

9.7. Co-curricular and Extra-curricular Activities (10)

(The institution may specify the co-curricular and extra-curricular activities) (Quantify activities such as NCC, NSS etc.)

Table B 9.7 CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES

CAY 2018-19

S. No.

Activity Date No. of students

Participated

1 “WISSENAIRE” Conducted by IIT Bhubaneswar 1st to 3rd Feb 2019 1

2 “ CEA FEST 2019” Conducted by IIT Madras 8th to 10th March

2019 5

3 “VINIRMITHI2K19” Conducted by ANITS 8th & 9th March 2019 179

4 51st Engineers Day celebrations 15th Sep 2018 111

5 115th birth anniversary celebrations of Padmabushan Dr. K L Rao

15th July 2018 100

EXTRA-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES

CAY 2018-19

S. No.


participated

1 Annual Day Games & Sports Event 1st to 5th Jan

2019 45

2 Relief camp on Srikakulam cyclone 14th October

2018 3

3 NRI Blood Donation Camp 30th August 2018 3

161


CAYm1 2017-18

S. No.


Participated

1 “SHAASTRA 2018” Conducted by I.I.T.Madras 5th Jan 2018 3

2 “ASPIRE2K18” Conducted by Aditya College of Engineering

23rd Feb 2018 1

3 “CHAKRAVYUH 2K18” Conducted by Raghu College of Engineering

3rd March 2018 1

4 “SOUDHA2K18” Conducted by J.N.T.U.K 24th Feb 2018 3

5 “SATHAKARYAN” Conducted by GVP College of Engineering

30th December 2017 3

6 “VINIRMITHI2K18” Conducted by ANITS 17th Feb 2018 252


15th July 2017 180

8 50th Engineers Day celebrations 15th Sep 2017 180


CAYm1 2017-18

S. No.


participated

1 Annual Day Games & Sports Event 2nd to 5th Jan

2018 45

2 Inter-Collegiate Championship- Tennis Sept – Oct, 2017 1

162


CAYm2 2016-17

S. No.


Participated

1 “SUPERNOVA-2K17” Conducted by SRKREC 5th & 6th Jan 2017 8


15th July 2016 180

3 49th Engineers Day celebrations 15th Sep 2016 180

4 “VISTA-2K17” Conducted by Vignan College of Engineering

17th & 18th March 7

5 “Mech UTSAV Tech Fest” Conducted by GITAM, Vskp

30th & 31st December

4


CAYm2 2016-17

S. No.


participated

1 Annual Day Dance Competitions Results 28th Jan 2017 5

2 Anits National Service Scheme (NSS) 24th Jan 2017 -

163

CRITERION 10 Governance, Institutional Support And Financial Resources 120

10. GOVERNANCE, INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES (120)

10.1. Organization, Governance and Transparency (40) 10.1.1. State the Vision and Mission of the Institute (5) Our Vision...

ANITS envisions emerging as a world-class technical institution whose products represent a good blend of

technological excellence and the best of human values.

Our Mission...

To train young men and women into competent and confident engineers with excellent communicational

skills, to face the challenges of future technology changes, by imparting holistic technical education using the

best of infrastructure, outstanding technical and teaching expertise and an exemplary work culture, besides

molding them into good citizens.

10.1.2. Governing body, administrative setup, functions of various bodies, service rules, procedures,

recruitment and promotional policies (10) Governing body is constituted as per the guidelines provided by AICTE. The organization chart of

administrative set up has been placed in Annexure-19 along with the functions of the various bodies.

The Governing Body meets twice a year and the minutes are recorded. The attendance is generally

80%.

All other academic and administrative bodies, their memberships, functions, and responsibilities,

frequency of the meetings along with few sample minutes of the meetings are given below.

S. No. Academic

Year Date of meeting

No. of members attended

Agenda of the meeting

Board of studies Meetings

1. 2015-16 20.06.2015 129 1. Finalization of first year curriculum 2. Any other item

2. 2015-16 26.03.2016 108 1. Finalization of II/IV B.Tech. 1st & 2nd

semester 2. Any other item

3. 2016-17 25.03.2017 111

1. Finalize the 3rd year scheme of instruction and the syllabus for 17-18 academic year

2. Any other item

4. 2017-18 28.04.2018 120

1. To finalize the 4th year scheme of instruction of curriculum and the syllabus for 18-19 academic year

2. Implementation of AICTE proposed model curriculum – structure and first year syllabus

5. 2018-19 30.03.2019 110 1. To finalize the 4th year scheme of instruction of curriculum and the

164

syllabus for 2018-19 academic year 2. Implementation of AICTE proposed

model curriculum – structure and first year syllabus

Academic Council Meetings

1. 2015-16 25.05.2015 17

1. Nomination of subject experts (externals) to the BOS for all the departments

2. Any Other item

2. 215-16 27.06.2015 25

1. Scrutiny and approval of the proposals of the BOS of all academic departments with regard to course of study, academic regulations, curricula, syllabi, instructional and evaluation arrangements, methods and procedures relevant there to etc.,

2. Approval of the academic and examination rules & regulations of the college in the autonomous system

3. Approval for the regulations for sports, extra-curricular activities and proper maintenance and functioning of the play ground and hostels

4. Consideration of proposals for introduction of new courses of study (if any),

5. Institution of scholarships, studentships, fellowships, prizes and medals and regulation for the award of the same,

6. Approvals of the Panel of paper setters and Examiners,

7. Schedule of examinations under Autonomous system.

3. 2016-17 02.04.2016 28

1. Approval of II/IV 1st & 2nd semester curriculum,

2. Approval of the panel of paper setters, 3. Schedule of Examinations II/IV B.Tech.

under Autonomous Scheme

4. 2016-17 01.04.2017 25

1. Approval of III/IV B.Tech. 1st & 2nd semester curriculum,

2. Approval of M.Tech. Civil – Soil Mechanics,

3. Approval of Panel of paper setters

5. 2017-18 20.06.2017 22

1. Academic performance of students under Autonomous scheme,

2. Academic regulations for promoting the students,

3. Any other item

6. 2017-18 05.05.2018 20

1. Approval of IV/IV B.Tech. 1st & 2nd semester curriculum,

2. Implementation of AICTE proposed model curriculum and its modalities,

3. Any other item

165

Board of Governing Meeting:

1. 2015-16 19.06.2015 10

1. Ratification of the Budget estimates for the autonomous grant relating to the academic year 2015-16 submitted by the Principal to UGC,

2. Approval of Budget for 2015-16, 3. Ratification of nomination of four

members to the Academic Council representing areas such as Engineering and Industry,

4. Ratification of the decision of the Principal to conduct the meeting of the Board of studies of all academic departments and Academic Council on 20.06.15 and 27.06.15 respectively,

5. Fixation of special fees and the examination fees payable by the students for the academic year 2015-16 as an Autonomous college, approval for filing-up office staff and examination cell,

6. Any other item

2. 2015-16 28.06.2015 9

1. Consideration and approval of the minutes of Academic Council

2. Consideration and approval of the recommendation of the Academic Council regarding institution scholarships, Fellowships, Studentships, Medals, Prizes and Certificates

3. 2015-16 01.02.2016 9

1. To confirm the minutes of the 36th Governing Body meeting held on 28-06-2015,

2. Action taken report on the previous minutes,

3. Ratification of all the appointments made subsequent to the previous Governing Body meeting,

4. Ratification of the decision of the Principal to conduct the meetings of the Board of Studies of all academic Depts. and Academic Council on 26-03-2016 and 02-04-2016,

5. To review the results of B.E./B.Tech. 1st Semester (2015-16),

6. Report on Placements, 7. Evaluation of additional space

needed, 8.Report on AFRC

4. 2015-16 03.04.2016 9

1. Consideration and approval of the minutes of the meeting of the Academic Council held on 02-04-2016;

166

5. 2016-17 28.08.2016 7

1. Ratification of the Budget estimates for the under autonomous stream relating to academic year 2016-17 which is approved by finance committee,

2. Approval of college Budget for the academic year 2016-17,

3. Ratification of all appointments made since last meeting of BOG,

4. Finalization of dates for BOS & Academic Council meeting for 2017-18,

5. Applying to AICTE for additional courses for the academic year 2017-18

6. 2016-17 08.04.2017


2. Review on placements and results of 2016-17

7. 2017-18 05.10.2017 10

1. Approval of college budget for the academic year 2017-18;

2. Ratification of all appointments made since last BOG meeting;

3. Approval of minutes of Academic Council meeting held on 20th June, 2017,

4. Finalization of dates for BoS and Academic Council meetings for 2017-18,

5. Quality enhancement by conducting internal audit

8. 2017-18 12.05.2018 8


2. Approval of college budget for the academic year 2018-19;

3. Ratification of all appointments made since last BOG meeting;

4. Finalization of dates for BoS and Academic Council meetings for 2018-19,

5. Review on various activities in the academic 2017-18

An Administration manual with service and conduct a rule of all employees of ANITS has been prepared and has been accepted by BOG vide meeting No: 12 dated 24th August 2006. It is published and supplied to each and every individual Department for awareness among the employees / students apart from the prospectus which is published every year is also supplied to all and placed in the website as well. Various committees were constituted to oversee effective functioning of various activities in the college

and across all the departments.

167

1. Committee for Examinations:

It has to schedule the examinations after consulting the committee for academic matters.

The conduct of mid examinations and check for distribution of corrected papers.

To conduct final examinations including supplementary.

To conduct laboratory examinations.

To arrange invigilators to various examinations, and to allot various rooms to them.

To plan for numbering / seating arrangements of the students.

To implement the numbering in the rooms.

To fix the laboratory examination dates in coordination with HODs of various departments and

respective department of the University and to provide hospitality to external examiners.

To collect the finalized sessional marks from the faculty with the help of HODs and to handover

them to Andhra University.

Preparation of lists of supplementary candidates and to display them in the notice boards.

To control the stationery concern of examinations.

a) Squad for checking Examination:

The committee consists of all the HODs and Professors of various departments. They will be making

sudden and surprise visits being coordinated by the Principal.

2. Attendance Committee:

To supervise and to finalize the attendance particulars of students regularly.

To Send the reports to HODs about the lagging students in the attendance and to get back to HODs

about the same to enquire if the parents are contacted or not.

To monitor the discipline of all the students for recording.

To prepare the final attendance reports for preparing condonation and detention lists.

3. Net Working Committee:

To check the working of Internet.

To check the working of Intranet.

To plan listed modifications in the field of Network for better communication and all the other

relevant works.

4. Amenities Committee:

To check about water supply, power supply facilities, sanitary maintenance etc.

To monitor greenery and cleanness of campus and overall cleanliness.

To pursue welfare measures like group insurance, group cell phones, etc.

To check the running of the Canteen.

5. Grievances and Welfare Committee:

To receive any grievances and to propose solutions

To receive, to address any grievances of faculty and non-teaching staff and try to prepare solutions

to address them with the help of administration.

To receive any problems concern to Women faculty and non-teaching staff and Girl Students.

To plan for welfare measures and facilities concerned to ladies.

6. Transport Committee:

To organize the bus transport network.

To check the suitability of transport of various programs conducted in the campus.

To check steps for prevention of un-authorized boarders

To see that Anti-ragging prevails in the buses.

168

7. Anti-Ragging Committee:

To check with any sort of ragging

To report to the administration any activities concerned to lead to ragging.

To display the various boards for educating about the Anti -ragging and to display

help-line numbers.

8. First year coordination committee:

To coordinate academic activities of all the first year classes including time tables.

Conducting of practical’s, distribution of class rooms for conducting various classes.

Coordination with respective HODs when seminars and conferences take place.

Coordinating with all the HODs to organize interdisciplinary subjects etc.

9. Committee for Website Maintenance:

To prepare the web page.

To update it whenever required, at least once a month.

To check the updates of web site every fortnight and also to keep the information of any special

programs as and when organized.

10.1.3. Decentralization in working and Grievance Redressal Mechanism (10)

All the academic activities are decentralized and departments function independently as per the

academic calendar.

Grievance-Redressal committee exists within the college level with Convener and three faculty

members, one supporting staff and two students (both male and female) from final year.

10.1.4. Delegation of financial powers (10) The Institution has well defined mechanism to monitor effective and efficient use of available resources.

College obtains proposals from concerned departments in a academic year under three different heads of

account i.e., capital budget, maintenance budget and developmental budget. After assessing the projected

income for an academic year, college allocates budget to each department and institution with minute

details. After the allocation, the departments can avail the financial resources within the sanctioned limit.

Purchases will be made with the recommendations of duly constituted purchase committee. The amounts

withdrawn from the banks will follow a systematic mechanism of obtaining the approval at various levels.

If any expenditure is made beyond budget sanction, ratification will be done in a special meeting.

Institution should explicitly mention financial powers delegated to the Principal, Heads of Departments

and relevant in-charges.

10.1.5. Transparency and availability of correct/unambiguous information in public domain (5) A website with the address ‘www.anits.edu.in’ is available with total transparency of information including

circulars, AICTE Compliance Report, Mandatory Disclosure, events in the Institute, attendance, marks,

placements, exams and academic calendar etc.

169

10.2. Budget Allocation, Utilization, and Public Accounting at Institute level (30) (25) Summary of current financial year’s budget and actual expenditure incurred (for the institution exclusively) in the three previous financial years.

Total Income at Institute level: For CFY, CFYm1, CFYm2 & CFYm3

Table B.10.2a

Financial Year

Total Income (Rs.) Actual Expenditure (Rs.)

Total No. of

students Expenditure per student

(Rs.) Fee Govt. Grants (S) Other Sources

(specify)

Recurring including Salaries

Non - recurring

Special Projects/

Any other, specify

2018-19 39,82,02,148 - 12,57,500 25,24,88,474 3,86,20,479 - 4,433 65,668

2017-18 33,71,73,623 - 18,24,500 27,69,24,804 2,78,60,719 - 4,233 72,002

2016-17 31,18,25,364 - 13,50,000 21,45,11,205 2,22,76,503 - 3,780 62,642

2015-16 29,87,10,682 - 11,65,862 13,08,59,656 1,02,934 - 3,311

70,611

2014-15 23,74,11,998 - 21,02,452 11,22,32,044 8,69,21,120 - 2,907

68,508

170

Table B.10.2b

Items Budgeted in

CFY(2018-19)

Actual expenses in

CFY

Budgeted in CFYm1

(2017-18)

Actual Expenses in

CFYm1

Budgeted in CFYm2

(2016-17)

Actual Expenses in

CFYm2

Budgeted in CFYm3

(2015-16)

Actual Expenses in

CFdYm3

Infrastructure Built-Up

11,55,00,000 2,61,10,179 6,35,00,000 5,78,44,721 3,93,00,000 7,17,71,050 2,61,00,000 1,77,54,204

Library 4121071 537794 4146565 1433809 4171190 2726637 800000 2786011

Laboratory equipment

19947992 10270806 16816216 9023137 17125589 7877969 6000000 8424240

Laboratory consumables

3070846 2241801 2662870 1894988 3075272 1317969 2452000 1494838

Teaching and non-teaching staff salary

210477546 201852740 200191825 192649766 162533856 159976002 143880000 136609126

Maintenance and spares

5338568 10935999 15109723 24625104 27103900 22600032 21000000 24888104

R&D 2000000 4773419 2000000 1891464 1200000 1234609 1000000 1386448

Training and Travel 2453055 2737168 3347184 4443683 1660500 3553439 1595000 1733060

Miscellaneous expenses *

59713821 35770273 35598233 31713763 24981900 20506463 29318200 33480666

Total 422622899 295230179 343372616 325520435 281152206 291564169 232145200 228856697

171

10.2.1. Adequacy of budget allocation (10)

Well ahead of the commencement of academic financial year, the Heads of the Departments

are directed to prepare their departmental budget. Accordingly the Heads of the

Departments shall consult their faculty members and lab in-charges; and in turn prepare

their departmental budget keeping in view their academic requirements.

Once the Departmental budgets are received from Heads of the Departments, the same

shall be consolidated and placed before the Board of Governors of the College for review and

recommendations. Once it’s recommended by the Board of Governors, the same is accepted

by the Management.

Since the budget is prepared by the user departments keeping in view their requirements,

the adequacy is justified.

10.2.2. Utilization of allocated funds (15) ANITS is a well established professional educational institution functioning over 18 years with

academic and financial discipline / excellence. Since the allocation is done based on the

actual requirements of the departments, the utilization is around 90%. The small variation of

utilization here and there may be on account of price variation and other relevant factors

prevailing at the time of actual procurement / utilization.

Albeit there is delay on receiving the funds from the govt., (because of non receipt of fee

reimbursement from the Government of Andhra Pradesh), for the past couple of years, we

are still ensuring that no academic interests are affected.

10.2.3. Availability of the audited statements on the institute’s website (5)

The audited statements are available on the institute’s website (www.anits.edu.in)

http://www.anits.edu.in/

172

10.3. Program Specific Budget Allocation, Utilization (30)

Table B.10.3a

For CFY (2018-19)

Total Budget: 7,80,000

Actual expenditure: 7,11,166

TotalNo.ofstudents:209 Utilization

Ratio Non-recurring

Recurring

Non Recurring

Recurring

Expenditure Per student

`7,00,000 80,000 6,85,808 25,358 3,402 91%

Note: All Figures in Rupees

For CFYm1 (2017-18)

Total Budget: 14,71,000

Actual expenditure: 12,63,966

Total No. of students: 212 Utilization

Ratio Non-recurring

Recurring

Non Recurring

Recurring

Expenditure Per student

13,46,000 1,25,000 12,16,369 47,597 5,962 86%


Note: Similar tables are to be prepared for CFYm1, CFYm2 & CFYm3.

For CFYm2 (2016-17)

Total Budget: 13,95,000 Actual expenditure:12,66,429 Total No. of students: 210

Utilization

Ratio Non-recurring

Recurring

Non Recurring

Recurring Expenditure Per student

13,40,000 55,000 12,35,331 31,098 6,030 91%


For CFYm3 (2015-16)

Total Budget: 26,30,000 Actual expenditure: 24,41,168 Total No. of students: 197 Utilization

Ratio Non-recurring

Recurring Non-Recurring Recurring Expenditure Per student

24,75,000 1,55,000 23,82,209 58,959 12,391 93%


173

Table B.10.3b Items

Budgeted in

CFY 2018-19

Actual Expense

in CFY 2018-19

Budgeted in

CFYm1 2017-18

Actual Expenses inCFYm1 2017-18

Budgeted in CFYm2

2016-17

Actual Expenses in CFYm2 2016-17

Budgeted in CFYm3 2015-16

Actual Expenses in CFYm3 2015-16

Laboratory Equipment 6,30,000 6,32,350 65,000 35,000 12,00,000 11,01,321 18,35,000 17,60,080

Software - - 9,41,000 8,80,280 - - - -

Laboratory Consumable

30,000 25,358 45,000 29980 30,000 21,010 50,000 24,970

Maintenance and Spares 50,000 - 30,000 12,500 10,000 - - -

R&D - - - - - - -

Training and Travel

20,000 23,458 50,000 5117 15,000 10,088 1,05,000 33,989

Miscellaneous expenses*

50,000 30,000 3,40,000 3,01,089 1,40,000 1,34,010 6,40,000 6,22,129

Total 7,80,000 7,11,166 14,71,000 12,63,966 13,95,000 12,66,429 26,30,000 24,41,168

174

10.3.1. Adequacy of budget allocation (10) (Program needs to justify that the budget allocated over the assessment years was adequate for the program)

Budget proposals with justification for each financial year are prepared generally in the month of

February of the preceding financial year based on the requirements raised by the laboratory in-

charges and faculty members of the department and discussion in the Department faculty meeting.

The proposal is submitted to Principal. Principal calls for an interaction meeting with the HoD to seek

clarifications if any. The proposal is then approved and the budget is sanctioned.

Adequacy of the budget allocated is justified as 1) Quality equipment is purchased from the

quotation, which is more often not the lowest 2) the department is able to establish i) its own

premises by 2015-16 ii) Air-conditioned computer centre with 45 desktop computers and UPS ii) A/c

seminar hall with public address system 3) licensed software such as STAAD Pro and ArcGIS have also

been procured.

10.3.2. Utilization of allocated funds (20) (Program needs to state how the budget was utilized during the last three assessment years)

The allocated funds are utilized fully by the Department by procuring all the non-consumables and

consumables. The gap between the sanctioned and utilized budget largely arises because the actual

price of the non-consumables is not exactly known at the time of submitting the budget proposal

and a higher amount is thus proposed.

10.4 Library and Internet (20)

AICTE has given Zero-deficiency report for all the Assessment years for which the program has

applied.

10.4.1 Quality of learning resources (hard/soft) (10)

(a) General information about central library:

Carpet area of library (in m2) : 1200 sq.mt.

Reading space (in m2) : 800 sq.mt.

Number of seats in reading space : 200

Number of users (issue book) per day : 450 per day

Number of users (reading space) per day : 200 per day

Timings:

During working day : 08:00 am to 07:00 pm

Weekend : (Sunday Closed)

Vacation : 08:00 am to 04:00 pm

Number of library staff : 7

Number of library staff with a degree in

Library Management : 5

Computerization for search, indexing,

issue/return records : Yes

Bar coding used : Yes

Library services on Internet/Intranet : Yes

INDEST or other similar membership archives : Yes

175

(b) Relevance of available learning resources including e-resources Titles and volumes per title Number of titles : 8435

Number of volumes : 38953

Year Number of New Titles

added Number of new editions

added Number of new volumes

added

CFYm3 (2015-16) 63 33 1438

CFYm2 (2016-17) 61 37 1431

CFYm1 (2017-18) 80 41 1945

CFY (2018-19) 86 20 808

Scholarly journal subscription

Details CFYm3

(2015-16) CFY m2

(2016-17) CFY m1

(2017-18) CFY

(2018-19)

Engg & Tech.

As Softy Copy 664 656 ---

IEEE, ASME, ASCE, ELSEVIER, J-GATE, DELNET Total: 507

As Hard Copy 96 81 --- Journals: 69 Magazines: 22 Total: 91

Accessibility to students and support to students for self-learning activities

Availability of digital library content If available : Yes Number of courses : 350 Number of e books : 755 Availability of an exclusive server : Yes Availability over Intranet/Internet : Yes Availability of exclusive space/room : Yes Number of users per day : 60 per day

10.4.2 Internet (10)

Band Width and service provider: 100 mbps (1:1) Leased line, Internet provider : Swiftmail Wi-Fi availability : Yes Internet access in labs, classrooms, library and offices of all Departments : Yes Security arrangements : Yes

177

ANNEXURES

178

Annexure-1

Program Outcomes (POs)

1. Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.

2. Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, research literature, and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.

3. Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.

4. Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.

5. Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.

6. The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.

7. Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.

8. Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice.

9. Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.

10. Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.

11. Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.

12. Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.

Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs)

1. Civil Engineering Knowledge: Analyse & design solutions to complex problems by applying

fundamentals of sciences and civil engineering in one or more of its major areas such as

structural, geo-technical, water resources, transportation and environmental engineering.

2. Conduct investigations of complex civil engineering problems: Use modern techniques and

tools to design and conduct experiments, prepare and interpret plans and reports with valid

conclusions and recommendations.

3. Civil engineer and society: Develop civil engineering solutions based on societal, health,

safety, legal, cultural and environmental considerations for sustainable development.

179

Annexure-2

181

Annexure-3

183

Annexure-4

184

Annexure-5

185

Annexure-6

186

Annexure-7

187

Annexure-7

188

Annexure-8 Table 3.2.2 Record of Course Outcome Attainment

CAY 2018-19

Course CO

Attainment

CIV111 English

CIV111.1 1.6

CIV111.2 1.6

CIV111.3 2

CIV111.4 1.3

CIV111.5 1.6

CIV112 Engineering

Mathematics – I

CIV112.1 1.3

CIV112.2 1

CIV112.3 1.7

CIV112.4 0.4

CIV112.5 1.4

CIV113 Engineering Physics

CIV113.1 0.4

CIV113.2 1.3

CIV113.3 0.7

CIV113.4 1.3

CIV113.5 1.7

CIV114 Engineering Drawing

CIV114.1 1.6

CIV114.2 1

CIV114.3 1

Course CO

Attainment

CIV114.4 0.7

CIV114.5 0.7

CIV115 Environmental Sciences

CIV115.1 2.6

CIV115.2 1.6

CIV115.3 2.2

CIV115.4 2

CIV115.5 1.6

CIV116 Engineering Physics Lab

CIV116.1 2.6

CIV116.2 2.6

CIV117 Programming With C Lab

CIV117.1 1.8

CIV117.2 2.6

CIV117.3 2.6

CIV117.4 1.8

CIV118 Workshop

CIV118.1 2.6

CIV118.2 2.6

CIV118.3 2.6

CIV118.4 3

CIV121 Engineering

Mathematics-II

189

Course CO

Attainment

CIV121.1 1.9

CIV121.2 1.7

CIV121.3 0.7

CIV121.4 0.7

CIV121.5 0.4

CIV122 Engineering Chemistry

CIV122.1 1

CIV122.2 1

CIV122.3 1

CIV122.4 1

CIV122.5 1

CIV122.6 0.4

CIV123 Professional Ethics And

Human Values

CIV123.1 2

CIV123.2 1

CIV123.3 1.0

CIV123.4 2

CIV123.5 2

CIV124 Mathematics For Civil

Engineers

CIV124.1 1.3

CIV124.2 0.7

CIV124.3 1.3

CIV124.4 1.6

CIV124.5 1

Course CO

Attainment

CIV125 Civil Engineering

Materials

CIV125.1 1

CIV125.2 0.9

CIV125.3 0


Lab

CIV126.1 2.6

CIV126.2 2.6

CIV127 Language Lab

CIV127.1 1.6

CIV127.2 2

CIV127.3 1.6

CIV127.4 2

CIV211 Engineering

Mathematics-III

CIV211.1 3

CIV211.2 0.4

CIV211.3 2

CIV211.4 0.4

CIV211.5 0

CIV212 Building Technology

CIV212.1 3

CIV212.2 3

CIV212.3 1.8

CIV212.4 1.2

190

Course CO

Attainment

CIV212.5 3

CIV212.6 3

CIV213 Engineering Geology

CIV213.1 0.6

CIV213.2 2.4

CIV213.3 1.6

CIV213.4 2

CIV213.5 1

CIV214 Engineering Mechanics

CIV214.1 1.4

CIV214.2 2.6

CIV214.3 2.2

CIV214.4 3

CIV214.5 1.2

CIV215 Surveying– I

CIV215.1 0.8

CIV215.2 1.4

CIV215.3 2

CIV215.4 1

CIV215.5 1.8

CIV216 Strength of Materials

CIV216.1 0

CIV216.2 0

CIV216.3 0

CIV216.4 0

Course CO

Attainment

CIV216.5 0

CIV217 Surveying Field Work-I

CIV217.1 3

CIV217.2 3

CIV217.3 3

CIV217.4 3

CIV217.5 3

CIV218 Strength of Materials Lab

CIV218.1 2.6

CIV218.2 2.6


CIV221.1 0.8

CIV221.2 0.4

CIV221.3 0.8

CIV221.4 0.4

CIV221.5 1

CIV222 Environmental

Engineering-I

CIV222.1 1

CIV222.2 0.4

CIV222.3 0.8

CIV222.4 2

CIV223 Fluid Mechanics-I

CIV223.1 0

CIV223.2 0

191

Course CO

Attainment

CIV223.3 0

CIV223.4 0.6

CIV224 Surveying – II

CIV224.1 3

CIV224.2 0.4

CIV224.3 0.8

CIV224.4 1

CIV224.5 1.4

CIV224.6 1.4

CIV225 Structural Analysis – I

CIV225.1 1.2

CIV225.2 0.4

CIV225.3 0.8

CIV225.4 1

CIV225.5 1

CIV225.6 0

CIV226 Building Planning &

Drawing

CIV226.1 1

CIV226.2 1.8

CIV226.3 1.4

CIV226.4 1.8

CIV226.5 1

CIV226.6 1

CIV227 Concrete Technology Lab

Course CO

Attainment

CIV227.1 3

CIV227.2 3

CIV228 Fluid Mechanics Lab-I

CIV228.1 3

CIV228.2 3

CIV229 Surveying Field Work –II

CIV229.1 3

CIV229.2 3

CIV229.3 3


Engineering-II

CIV312.1 2.4

CIV312.2 2.4

CIV312.3 1.2

CIV312.4 1.2

CIV313 Reinforced Concrete

Structures-I

CIV313.1 1.8

CIV313.2 1.8

CIV313.3 1.8

CIV313.4 1.8

CIV313.5 1.4

CIV314 Structural Analysis – II

CIV314.1 1.8

CIV314.2 0.6

CIV314.3 1.8

192

Course CO

Attainment

CIV314.4 1.8

CIV314.5 3

CIV315 Fluid Mechanics-II

CIV315.1 1.2

CIV315.2 0.4

CIV315.3 0.8

CIV315.4 0.4

CIV316 Geotechnical

Engineering – I

CIV316.1 1.8

CIV316.2 1.2

CIV316.3 3

CIV316.4 3

CIV316.5 1.2

CIV317 Geotechnical

Engineering Lab-I

CIV317.1 3

CIV317.2 3


Engineering Lab

CIV318.1 3

CIV318.2 3

CIV319 Fluid Mechanics Lab-II

CIV319.1 3

CIV319.2 3

CIV3110 Quantitative & Verbal

Course CO

Attainment

Aptitude -I

CIV3110.1 2

CIV3110.2 2

CIV3110.3 2

CIV3110.4 2

CIV3110.5 2

CIV3110.6 2

CIV3110.7 2

CIV3110.8 2

CIV3111 Technical Seminar

CIV3111.1 2

CIV3111.2 2

CIV3111.3 2

CIV3111.4 2

CIV3111.5 2

CIV321 Reinforced Concrete

Structures-II

CIV321.1 3

CIV321.2 3

CIV321.3 3

CIV321.4 2

CIV321.5 3

CIV322 Estimation & Costing

CIV322.1 2.6

CIV322.2 2.6

193

Course CO

Attainment

CIV322.3 2

CIV323 Geotechnical

Engineering – II

CIV323.1 2.4

CIV323.2 3

CIV323.3 1.2

CIV323.4 2.6

CIV323.5 1.8

CIV324 Transportation

Engineering-I

CIV324.1 1.8

CIV324.2 0.8

CIV324.3 0.8

CIV324.4 0.8

CIV324.5 1.2

CIV325 Water Resources

Engineering – I

CIV325.1 1.2

CIV325.2 1.4

CIV325.3 1.6

CIV325.4 2.4

CIV325.5 2.6

CIV327 Geotechnical

Engineering Lab-II

CIV327.1 3

CIV327.2 3

CIV328 Computer Applications in

Course CO

Attainment

Civil Engineering Lab-I

CIV328.1 3

CIV328.2 3

CIV328.3 3

CIV329 Quantitative & Verbal

Aptitude –II

CIV329.1 2

CIV329.2 2

CIV329.3 2

CIV329.4 2

CIV329.5 2

CIV329.6 2

CIV329.7 2

CIV329.8 2

CIV3210 Soft Skills Lab

CIV3210.1 3

CIV3210.2 3

CIV3210.3 3

CIV3210.4 3

CIV3210.5 3

CIV411 Open Elective-I (Nano

Technology)

CIV411.1 2.4

CIV411.2 3

CIV411.3 3

CIV411.4 3

194

Course CO

Attainment

CIV411.5 3

CIV412 Professional Elective - II

(Air Pollution & control)

CIV412.1 3

CIV412.2 2.4

CIV412.3 3

CIV412.4 3

CIV413 Project Planning &

Management

CIV413.1 1.8

CIV413.2 1.8

CIV413.3 3

CIV414 Steel Structures

CIV414.1 2.2

CIV414.2 0.8

CIV414.3 1.4

CIV414.4 1.2

CIV415 Water Resources

Engineering - II

AIV415.1 1.8

AIV415.2 1.2

AIV415.3 1

AIV415.4 1.4

AIV415.5 1.2


Engineering-II

Course CO

Attainment

CIV416.1 2.6

CIV416.2 3

CIV416.3 2.6

CIV416.4 2.4

CIV416.5 2.4

CIV417 Computer Applications

in Civil Engineering Lab-II

CIV417.1 3

CIV417.2 3

CIV417.3 3

CIV417.4 3


Engineering Lab

CIV418.1 3

CIV418.2 3

CIV418.3 3

CIV419 Project work-I

CIV419.1 3

CIV419.2 3

CIV419.3 3

CIV419.4 3

CIV4110 Industrial Training

CIV4110.1 2

CIV4110.2 2

CIV4110.3 2

CIV4110.4 2

195

Course CO

Attainment

CIV4110.5 2

CIV 421(D) Professional Elective

– III (Ground Improvement

Techniques)

CIV422.1 3

CIV422.2 2.4

CIV422.3 1.8

CIV422.4 2.4

CIV422.5 1.2

CIV423 Engineering Economics &

Finance

BIV423.1 3

BIV423.2 3

Course CO

Attainment

CIV424 Irrigation Structures

Design & Drawing

CIV424.1 3

CIV424.2 3

CIV424.3 3

CIV424.4 3

CIV424.5 3

CIV426 Project Work - II

CIV426.1 3

CIV426.2 3

CIV426.3 3

CIV426.4 3

196

Annexure-9

197

Annexure-10

198

Annexure-11

199

ANNEXURE 12

TABLE B.5 FACULTY INFORMATION

CAY 2018-19

S.

No.

Nam

e o

f Fa

cult

y

Me

mbe

r

Qualification

Ass

oci

atio

n w

ith

Inst

itu

tio

n(Ye

ars)

De

sign

atio

n

Dat

e o

n w

hic

h

De

sign

ate

d a

s

Ass

oci

ate

Pro

fess

or/

Pro

fess

or

Dat

e o

f Jo

inin

g

De

par

tme

nt

Spe

cial

izat

ion

Academic Research

Cu

rre

ntl

y A

sso

ciat

ed

(Y

/N)

Dat

e o

f le

avin

g (I

n c

ase

Cu

rren

tly

asso

ciat

ed is

“N

O”

)

Nat

ure

of

Ass

oci

atio

n

De

gre

e(H

ighe

st

De

gre

e)

Un

ive

rsit

y

Ye

ar a

ttai

nin

g

Hig

he

r

Qu

alif

icat

ion

Re

sear

ch p

ape

r

Pu

bli

cati

on

Ph

.D. G

uid

ance

Facu

lty

rece

ivin

g

Ph

.D. d

uri

ng

the

Ass

ess

me

nt

Year

1 B.N.D. Narasinga Rao Ph. D A.U 1998 6 Professor

& HOD 27.05.2013 27.05.2013 Civil Engg. Soil - - - YES Regular

2 A. Rama Mohan Rao M E A.U 1975 6.10 Professor 02.07.2012 02.07.2012 Civil Engg. Marine - - - YES Adjunct

3 A Santha Ram Ph. D NIT-

Nagpur 2010 0.7 Professor 03-10-2018 03-10-2018 Civil Engg. Mining - - -

NO

(01-01-2019) Adjunct

4 J. Vikranth M.E A.U 2003 6.10 Assistant

Professor - 07.06.2012 Civil Engg. Structural - - - YES Regular

5 M.K.S.S. Krishna Chaitanya M.E GITAM 2009 4.11 Assistant

Professor - 09.06.2014 Civil Engg. SE&NDM - - - YES Regular

6 T. Kiran Kumar M.Tech NIT-W 2014 4.11 Assistant

Professor - 14.06.2014 Civil Engg. TE - - - YES Regular

7 P.V.R. Sravya M.E A.U. 2014 4.10 Assistant

Professor - 30.07.2014 Civil Engg. EE 3 - - YES Regular

8 Ch. Vineel M.E A.U. 2014 4.7 Assistant

Professor - 21.10.2014 Civil Engg. Soil 1 - - YES Regular

9 T. Venkata Viswa Teja M.E A.U. 2014 4.6 Assistant

Professor - 28.11.2014 Civil Engg. Soil - - - YES Regular

10 P. Vandana Rao M.Tech A.U. 2015 2.10 Assistant


11 M.Premchand M.Tech NIT-RKL 2016 1.11 Assistant

Professor - 01-06-2017 Civil Engg. WRE - - - YES Regular

200

S.

No.

Nam

e o

f Fa

cult

y

Me

mbe

r

Qualification

Ass

oci

atio

n w

ith

Inst

itu

tio

n(Ye

ars)

De

sign

atio

n

Dat

e o

n w

hic

h

De

sign

ate

d a

s

Ass

oci

ate

Pro

fess

or/

Pro

fess

or

Dat

e o

f Jo

inin

g

De

par

tme

nt

Spe

cial

izat

ion

Academic Research

Cu

rre

ntl

y A

sso

ciat

ed

(Y

/N)

Dat

e o

f le

avin

g (I

n c

ase

Cu

rren

tly

asso

ciat

ed is

“N

O”

)

Nat

ure

of

Ass

oci

atio

n

De

gre

e(H

ighe

st

De

gre

e)

Un

ive

rsit

y

Ye

ar a

ttai

nin

g

Hig

he

r

Qu

alif

icat

ion

Re

sear

ch p

ape

r

Pu

bli

cati

on

Ph

.D. G

uid

ance

Facu

lty

rece

ivin

g

Ph

.D. d

uri

ng

the

Ass

ess

me

nt

Year

12 Ch. Srinivas M.Tech GITAM 2015 1.11 Assistant

Professor - 01-06-2017 Civil Engg. SE&NDM - - - YES Regular

13 K.Suryanarayana M.Tech NIT-T 2011 1.11 Assistant

Professor - 12-06-2017 Civil Engg. Structural - - - YES Regular

14 J.Harshavardhan Reddy M.Tech SVNIT 2017 1.11 Assistant

Professor - 17-06-2017 Civil Engg. EE - - - YES Regular

15 M.Nagalakshmi M.Tech A.U. 2017 1.9 Assistant

Professor - 03-08-2017 Civil Engg. Soil - - - YES Regular

16 P.V.R.K Reddy M.Tech A.U. 2012 0.11 Assistant

Professor - 01-06-2018 Civil Engg Structural - - - YES Regular

Soil: Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering; Marine: Marine Structures; Mining: Mining Engineering; Structural: Structural Engineering; S&NDM: Structural Engineering & Natural Disaster

Management; TE: Transportation Engineering; EE: Environmental Engineering; WRE: Water Resource Engineering

201

Annexure-12 TABLE B.5

CAYm1 (2017-18)

S.

No.

Nam

e o

f Fa

cult

y

Me

mbe

r

Qualification

Ass

oci

atio

n w

ith

Inst

itu

tio

n(Ye

ars)

De

sign

atio

n

Dat

e o

n w

hic

h

De

sign

ate

d a

s

Ass

oci

ate

Pro

fess

or/

Pro

fess

or

Dat

e o

f Jo

inin

g

De

par

tme

nt

Spe

cial

izat

ion

Academic Research

Cu

rre

ntl

y A

sso

ciat

ed

(Y

/N)

Dat

e o

f le

avin

g (I

n c

ase

Cu

rren

tly

asso

ciat

ed is

“N

O”

)

Nat

ure

of

Ass

oci

atio

n

De

gre

e(H

ighe

st

De

gre

e)

Un

ive

rsit

y

Ye

ar a

ttai

nin

g

Hig

he

r

Qu

alif

icat

ion

Re

sear

ch p

ape

r

Pu

bli

cati

on

Ph

.D. G

uid

ance

Facu

lty

rece

ivin

g

Ph

.D. d

uri

ng

the

Ass

ess

me

nt

Year


& HOD 27.05.2013 27.05.2013 Civil Engg. Soil 1 - - YES Regular

2 A. Rama Mohan Rao M E A.U 1975 5.10 Professor 02.07.2012 02.07.2012 Civil Engg. Marine - - - YES Adjunc

t

3 V. Venkateswara Rao Ph. D A.U 1984 5.11 Professor 06.06.2012 06.06.2012 Civil Engg. RSGIS - - - YES Adjunc

t


Professor - 07.06.2012 Civil Engg. Structural 2 - - YES Regular


Professor - 09.06.2014 Civil Engg. SE&NDM 1 - - YES Regular


Professor - 14.06.2014 Civil Engg. TE 1 - - YES Regular







10 B. Ramana Raja M.Tech IIT-

KGP 2011 3.4

Assistant




202

S.

No.

Nam

e o

f Fa

cult

y

Me

mbe

r

Qualification

Ass

oci

atio

n w

ith

Inst

itu

tio

n(Ye

ars)

De

sign

atio

n

Dat

e o

n w

hic

h

De

sign

ate

d a

s

Ass

oci

ate

Pro

fess

or/

Pro

fess

or

Dat

e o

f Jo

inin

g

De

par

tme

nt

Spe

cial

izat

ion

Academic Research

Cu

rre

ntl

y A

sso

ciat

ed

(Y

/N)

Dat

e o

f le

avin

g (I

n c

ase

Cu

rren

tly

asso

ciat

ed is

“N

O”

)

Nat

ure

of

Ass

oci

atio

n

De

gre

e(H

ighe

st

De

gre

e)

Un

ive

rsit

y

Ye

ar a

ttai

nin

g

Hig

he

r

Qu

alif

icat

ion

Re

sear

ch p

ape

r

Pu

bli

cati

on

Ph

.D. G

uid

ance

Facu

lty

rece

ivin

g

Ph

.D. d

uri

ng

the

Ass

ess

me

nt

Year

12 M.Premchand M.Tech NIT-

RKL 2016 0.11

Assistant

Professor - 01-06-2017 Civil Engg. WRE 1 - - YES Regular

13 Ch. Srinivas M.Tech GITAM 2015 0.11 Assistant

Professor - 01-06-2017 Civil Engg. SE&NDM 2 - - YES Regular

14 K.Suryanarayana M.Tech NIT-T 2011 0.11 Assistant

Professor - 12-06-2017 Civil Engg. Structural 1 - - YES Regular

15 J.Harshavardhan Reddy M.Tech SVNIT 2017 0.11 Assistant

Professor - 17-06-2017 Civil Engg. EE 1 - - YES Regular

16 M.Nagalakshmi M.Tech A.U. 2017 0.9 Assistant

Professor - 03-08-2017 Civil Engg. Soil 1 - - YES Regular

Soil: Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering; Marine: Marine Structures; RSGIS: Remote Sensing and GIS; Structural: Structural Engineering; S&NDM: Structural Engineering & Natural Disaster


203


CAYm2 (2016-17)

S.

No.

Nam

e o

f Fa

cult

y

Me

mbe

r

Qualification

Ass

oci

atio

n w

ith

Inst

itu

tio

n(Ye

ars)

De

sign

atio

n

Dat

e o

n w

hic

h

De

sign

ate

d a

s

Ass

oci

ate

Pro

fess

or/

Pro

fess

or

Dat

e o

f Jo

inin

g

De

par

tme

nt

Spe

cial

izat

ion

Academic Research

Cu

rre

ntl

y A

sso

ciat

ed

(Y

/N)

Dat

e o

f le

avin

g (I

n c

ase

Cu

rren

tly

asso

ciat

ed is

“N

O”

)

Nat

ure

of

Ass

oci

atio

n

De

gre

e(H

ighe

st

De

gre

e)

Un

ive

rsit

y

Ye

ar a

ttai

nin

g

Hig

he

r

Qu

alif

icat

ion

Re

sear

ch p

ape

r

Pu

bli

cati

on

Ph

.D. G

uid

ance

Facu

lty

rece

ivin

g

Ph

.D. d

uri

ng

the

Ass

ess

me

nt

Year


& HOD 27.05.2013 27.05.2013 Civil Engg. Soil 2 - - YES Regular


3 V. Venkateswara Rao Ph. D A.U 1984 4.11 Professor 06.06.2012 06.06.2012 Civil Engg. RSGIS - - - YES Adjunct














KGP 2011 2.4

Assistant


204

S.

No. N

ame

of

Facu

lty

Me

mbe

r

Qualification

Ass

oci

atio

n w

ith

Inst

itu

tio

n(Ye

ars)

De

sign

atio

n

Dat

e o

n w

hic

h

De

sign

ate

d a

s

Ass

oci

ate

Pro

fess

or/

Pro

fess

or

Dat

e o

f Jo

inin

g

De

par

tme

nt

Spe

cial

izat

ion

Academic Research

Cu

rre

ntl

y A

sso

ciat

ed

(Y

/N)

Dat

e o

f le

avin

g (I

n c

ase

Cu

rren

tly

asso

ciat

ed is

“N

O”

)

Nat

ure

of

Ass

oci

atio

n

De

gre

e(H

ighe

st

De

gre

e)

Un

ive

rsit

y

Ye

ar a

ttai

nin

g

Hig

he

r

Qu

alif

icat

ion

Re

sear

ch p

ape

r

Pu

bli

cati

on

Ph

.D. G

uid

ance

Facu

lty

rece

ivin

g

Ph

.D. d

uri

ng

the

Ass

ess

me

nt

Year

11 A. Vamsi Krishna M.Tech NIT-

RKL 2016 0.11

Assistant


12 V. Leela Manusha M.Tech NIT-

RKL 2016 0.11

Assistant

Professor - 13.06.2016 Civil Engg. TE - - - YES Regular

13 D. Sindhuja M.Tech NIT-

RKL 2016 0.11

Assistant

Professor - 13.06.2016 Civil Engg. GTE - - - YES Regular




Management; TE: Transportation Engineering; EE: Environmental Engineering; WRE: Water Resource Engineering; GTE: Geotechnical Engineering

205


CAYm3 (2015-16)

S.

No. N

ame

of

Facu

lty

Me

mbe

r

Qualification

Ass

oci

atio

n w

ith

Inst

itu

tio

n(Ye

ars)

De

sign

atio

n

Dat

e o

n w

hic

h

De

sign

ate

d a

s

Ass

oci

ate

Pro

fess

or/

Pro

fess

or

Dat

e o

f Jo

inin

g

De

par

tme

nt

Spe

cial

izat

ion

Academic Research

Cu

rre

ntl

y A

sso

ciat

ed

(Y

/N)

Dat

e o

f le

avin

g (I

n c

ase

Cu

rren

tly

asso

ciat

ed is

“N

O”

)

Nat

ure

of

Ass

oci

atio

n

De

gre

e(H

ighe

st

De

gre

e)

Un

ive

rsit

y

Ye

ar a

ttai

nin

g

Hig

he

r

Qu

alif

icat

ion

Re

sear

ch p

ape

r

Pu

bli

cati

on

Ph

.D. G

uid

ance

Facu

lty

rece

ivin

g

Ph

.D. d

uri

ng

the

Ass

ess

me

nt

Year


& HOD 27.05.2013 27.05.2013 Civil Engg. Soil - - - YES Regular


3 V. Venkateswara Rao Ph. D A.U 1984 3.11 Professor 06.06.2012 06.06.2012 Civil Engg. RSGIS - - - YES Adjunct

4 V. Viswanadham Ph. D A.U 1983 1 Professor 19-05-2015 19-05-2015 Civil Engg. EE - - - NO

(27-02-2016) Contract



6 K.Lovaraju M.Tech GITAM 2014 1.11 Assistant

Professor - 04-06-2014 Civil Engg. SE&NDM - - -

NO

(18-12-2015) Regular

7 K. Mukesh Kumar M.Tech JNTUK 2015 0.3 Assistant

Professor - 01-01-2016 Civil Engg. Structural - - - YES Regular





206

S.

No.

Nam

e o

f Fa

cult

y

Me

mbe

r

Qualification

Ass

oci

atio

n w

ith

Inst

itu

tio

n(Ye

ars)

De

sign

atio

n

Dat

e o

n w

hic

h

De

sign

ate

d a

s

Ass

oci

ate

Pro

fess

or/

Pro

fess

or

Dat

e o

f Jo

inin

g

De

par

tme

nt

Spe

cial

izat

ion

Academic Research

Cu

rre

ntl

y A

sso

ciat

ed

(Y

/N)

Dat

e o

f le

avin

g (I

n c

ase

Cu

rren

tly

asso

ciat

ed is

“N

O”

)

Nat

ure

of

Ass

oci

atio

n

De

gre

e(H

ighe

st

De

gre

e)

Un

ive

rsit

y

Ye

ar a

ttai

nin

g

Hig

he

r

Qu

alif

icat

ion

Re

sear

ch p

ape

r

Pu

bli

cati

on

Ph

.D. G

uid

ance

Facu

lty

rece

ivin

g

Ph

.D. d

uri

ng

the

Ass

ess

me

nt

Year





12 V.Sreelakshmi M.E A.U. 2014 1.6 Assistant

Professor 24-11-2014 Civil Engg. EE - - - YES Regular




KGP 2011 1.4

Assistant


15 B.G.Rajeev Gandhi M.Tech IIT-G 2011 0.9 Assistant

Professor 13-08-2015 Civil Engg. WRE - - - YES Regular



207

Annexure-13

Faculty publications

(CAY 2018-19)

S.No. Name of the

author

Title of

the paper

Name of the

journal

Month

and Year of

Issue

International

Database in listed

Impact

Factor

1 Dr. B.N.D. Narasinga Rao Use of Parwada Fly Ash as substitute to soil in Embankments and Subgrade

International Journal of Management, Technology and

Engineering

April 2019 UGC Approved 6.3

2 MKSSK Chaitanya A Comparative Study on Flexural Strength of Steel Binding Wire and Jute Fibers in concrete over ordinary Concrete

Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research

May 2019 UGC Approved 5.87

3 MKSSK Chaitanya Comparative Study of Pre Engineered and Conventional Steel Building of 40km wide

Industrial Shed

International Journal of

Management Technology and Engineering


4 P.V.R.Sravya A Study of Assessment of Ground Water Quality

at Certain Industrial Zones in Visakhapatnam AP

Water Resource &

Environmental Engineering I

September

2018

Springer -

5 P.V.R.Sravya Multivariate Statistical Analysis of River Water Quality-A study of River Godavari in AP

Water Resource & Environmental Engineering II

September 2018

Springer -

6 P.V.R.Sravya Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Godavari River at Polavaram of Irrigation Purpose

Water Resource & Environmental Engineering II

September 2018

Springer -

7 Ch.Vineel Strength comparison between normally cured

and accelerated cured concrete with partial replacement of sand with pond ash

Journal of Emerging

Technologies and innovative research

September

2018

UGC Approved 5.87

208

S.No. Name of the author

Title of the paper

Name of the journal

Month and Year

of Issue

International Database in

listed

Impact Factor

8 T.V.Viswa Teja A Study on Establishment of Domestic Wind

Turbines At ANITS Campus

International

Journal of Management, Technology And

Engineering

March 2019 UGC Approved 6.3

9 T.V.Viswa Teja A Comparative Study on Compressive and

Flexural Strength of Fiber Reinforced Concrete and Ordinary Concrete

Journal of Emerging

Technologies and Innovative Research


10 P. Vandana Rao Analysis on Response of Square Footing on sloping Terrain using PLAXIS 2D

Journal of Emerging Technologies and

Innovative Research

June 2019 UGC Approved 5.87

11 M. Premchand 2D Flow Simulation for the upstream side of Nagarjuna Sagar Reservoir using HEC-RAS

Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research


12 Ch. Srinivas Experimental Study on Compressive Strength of

Concrete by Partially Replacing Cement with Micro Silica

International

Journal of Management Technology and

Engineering

March 2019 UGC Approved 6.3

13 Ch. Srinivas Study on Investigation of Micro Silica as Partial

Replacement of Cement in Concrete

International

Journal of Applied Engineering Research


14 J Harshavardhan Reddy Geosynthetics- A modern Civil Engineering

Construction Material

International

Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews

June 2019 UGC Approved 5.75

15 PVRK Reddy Application of the Affine theorem to a two way rectangular orthotropic slab with one long side

discontinuous and simply supported on other three sides having an interior corner opening

Universal Review Journal


209


(CAYm1 2017-18)

S. No.

Name of the Author

Title of the paper

Name of the journal

Month and Year

International Database listed

Impact Factor

1 Dr.BND. Narasinga Rao

Geotechnical Properties of Parawada Fly ash and Thagarapuvalasa soil

Mixtures for Use in Highway

Embankments

International Journal of Basic and Applied Research

June-2018 Google Scholar 5.86

2 J.Vikranth Application of the Affine Theorem to an Orthotropic Rectangular

Reinforced Concrete Slab Having a

interior Corner Opening

International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)

Sep-2017 Google Scholar 2.85

3 J.Vikranth Application of the affine theorem to

an orthotropic rectangular reinforced concrete slab continuous over one long side and simply supported on

other three sides having an interior corner opening

International journal of Advanced in

Management, Technology & Engineering Sciences


4 MKSSK Chaitanya Comparative Study of Pre Engineered and Conventional Steel Building

International journal of Advanced in Management, Technology &

Engineering Sciences


5 T.Kiran Kumar A Study on Effective Use of Plastic

Waste in Flexible Pavements




6 P.V.R.Sravya Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Godavari River Water Quality for

Irrigation

Purpose at Rajahmundry & Dhawaleswaram

International Journal of Civil, Structural, Environmental and

Infrastructural Engineering

Research and Development

October 2017

Google Scholar 7.9

7 Ch.Vineel Evaluation of Crusher Dust as Replacement of Filler in Concrete

IOSR Journal of Engineering September 2017

UGC Approved 1.645

8 Ch.Vineel Appraisal of Rock Flour as Frictional Fill Material for use in Reinforced

Earth Structures

SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering

March 2018 Google Scholar 2.21

210

S. No.

Name of the Author

Title of the paper

Name of the journal

Month and Year


Impact Factor

9 T.V.ViswaTeja Planning and Design of Net-Zero

Energy Residential Building(NZERB)




10 P.Vandana Rao A Parametric Study on Black Cotton Soil Stabilized Using Rice Husk Ash




11 M.Premchand Rooftop Rain Water Harvesting

Technique for ANITS Campus

Journal of Emerging Technologies

and Innovative Research


12 Ch.Srinivas Experimental Study on mechanical properties of concrete by partially

replacing cement with GGBS and fine aggregate with copper slag



April 2018 UGC Aprovved 6.3

13 Ch.Srinivas Experimental study of Copper slag on

mechanical properties of concrete

International journal of Applied

Engineering Research

April 2018 UGC Approved

14 K. Suryanarayana Study on Glass Fiber Reinforced Fly Ash Concrete



April 2018 UGC Aprovved 6.3

15 J. Harsha Vardhana Reddy

A Review on integrated Solid Waste Management in Visakhapatnam City



May 2018 UGC Aprovved 6.3

16

M.Nagalakshmi Effect of shape of Footing on Coefficient of elastic uniform

compression of fine sand

Indian Geotechnical Conference 2017, GeoNEst

December 2017

-- --

211


(CAYm2 2016-17)

S. No.

Name of the author

Title of the paper

Name of the journal

Month and Year


Impact Factor

1 Dr.B.N.D. Narasinga

Rao

Properties Of Parawada Fly Ash

Concrete

International Journal of Advances In

Civil And Structural Engineering, Mantech Publications

Vol. 1, Issue

3, 2016

Google Scholar

Index Copernicus -

2 Dr.B.N.D. Narasinga Rao

Use of Parawada Fly Ash in Concrete as Partial Replacement of Cement

International Journal of Engineering Technology Science and Re search IJETSR

May 2017 Google Scholar 2.12

3 J.Vikranth A Study on use of Plastic Waste (Polypropylene) in Flexible Pavements

International Journal of Engineering and Management Research

May – June 2017

Google Scholar 3.105

4 MKSSK Chaitanya

Experimental Study On Mechanical &

Durability Properties Of Conventional Concrete As A Partial Replacement Of Iron Ore With & Without Use Of Glass

Fibres

International Journal of Research in Science & Technology

Dec -2016 Index Copernicus 1.92

5 P.V.R.Sravya An Experimental Study on parametric variations during composting of

Municipal Solid Waste

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and

Technology

Oct-2016 Cite factor 1.0

6 T.Kiran Kumar A Study on use of Plastic Waste

(Polypropylene) in Flexible Pavements

International Journal of Engineering and Management

Research

May – June

2017

Google Scholars

3.105

7 P. Vandana Rao Study on Strength Characteristics of Pond ash Replaced Fine aggregate in Pavement Quality Control

International Journal of Engineering and Management Research

May – June 2017

Google Scholars

3.105

212

Annexure-14 Performance Appraisal Format

SELF APPRAISAL FORM FOR TEACHING STAFF

(To be filled up by the faculty member)

1. Name :

2. Present Designation :

3. Department :

4. Date of Joining – Service in this college & Designation :

5. Date of elevation to the present position:

6. Highest Academic Qualification:

7. Experience (Teaching / Industry/ Research)

(a) At ANITS _______________ Years _____________

Months

(b) Elsewhere Experience: Teaching:_______________ Years _____________

Months

Industry / Research: _______________ Years _____________

Months

________________________________________________________________

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

01.Teaching, Learning And Evaluation Related Activities:

1.1 Work Load:

S No

Year /Semester Teaching Load (Max: 20M)

Work load % Score (Self) Score (HOD)

1

2

Average

213

1.2 & 1.3 Student feedback & Pass percentage:

S.No. Year / Semester

Course Student Feedback (Max: 25M)

Pass percentage (Max: 25M)

% Score

(Self)

Score

(HOD)

% Score

(Self)

Score

(HOD)

Average Average

2. Co-Curricular, Extension and Professional Development

S.No

Indicators Details of Activities Score (Self)

Score (HOD)

2.1 Co-curricular Activities (Max: 5M)

2.2 Professional Development Activities (Max: 10M)

2.3 Department Administration (Max: 15M)

-

S.No Indicators Details of Activities Score

(Self)

Score

(HOD) 1.4 Preparation of study

material / resources (Max: 10M)

1.5 Innovative / student centric teaching- learning methods (Max: 10M)

1.6 Curriculum preparation and examination related work (Max: 10M)

214

S.No

Indicators Details of Activities Score (Self)

Score (HOD)

2.4 (a) (b)

Mentoring of students Guidance in course work (Max: 5M) Career guidance, Training etc.. (Max: 5M)

3. Research and Academic Contributions

S.No Indicators Details of Activities Score

(Self)

Score

(HOD) 3.1 Research Papers

Published

3.2 Publications (Books, Chapters in books

other than journals)

3.3 Research Projects

3.4 Research Guidance

3.5 Consultancy

3.6 Participation or Presentation in Training courses/ Conference/ Seminars/ Workshops

3.7 Training Courses/ Conference/ Seminar/ Workshop Organized

215

S.No Indicators Details of Activities Score (Self)

Score (HOD)

3.8 Awards/ Honors/ Recognitions

S No Category Score (Self) Score (HOD)

1 Teaching, Learning And Evaluation Related Activities (Total of 1.1 to 1.6 above)

2 Co-Curricular, Extension And Professional Development

Related Activities. (Total of 2.1 to 2.4 above)

3 Research And Academic Contributions ( Total of 3.1 to 3.8 above)

The above information is true to the best of my knowledge.

Signature of the faculty member

Signature of HoD

To be filled in by the Office:

1. Date of Joining ANITS :

2. Present Emoluments & Scale :

3. Due date of increment :

4. Score assessed by the Principal :

Signature of Principal

216

PROFORMA FOR SANCTION OF ANNUAL INCREMENT / SCALE

1. Name of the faculty member : 2. Designation : 3. Department : 4. Academic Qualification : 5. Date of Joining : 6. Due date of Increment : 7. Teaching Experience : a) in ANITS b) Else Where 8. Subjects Taught : 9. Whether in Scale / Consolidated : 10. Any other useful information : Specific remarks of the Head of the Department Signature of HoD

To be filled in by the Office:

Present After increment

Basic

DA

HRA

Others

Total

Director (Admn)

Recommendations of Principal Signature of Principal

Approval Signature of Secretary & Correspondent

217

Annexure-15 Academic Audit Format

IQAC

DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE INDEX-ANITS (DPI-A)

Modified w.e.f. 2018-19

1. Teaching – Learning Processes : 250

2. Student’s Performance : 200

3. Faculty contributions : 275

4. Co-curricular activities : 100

5. Students support systems : 100

6. Continuous improvement : 50

7. Best Practices : 25

Total : 1000

____________________________________________________________________________

1. Teaching Learning Processes: (Max – 250)

S.

No

Description Max

marks

Marks

awarded

Remarks

1.1 Initiative for improvement of quality in teaching and learning (50)

1.1.1 Availability of Academic Calendar of the department based

on Institute’s academic calendar and its effective

compliance / implementation and adherence to schedule

5

1.1.2 Implementation of pedagogical initiatives such as real life

examples, collaborative learning, ICT supported learning,

interactive class rooms etc.

10

1.1.3 Guidelines to identify weak and bright students (3M); post

identification actions taken (3M); impact observed and

recorded (4M)

10

1.1.4 Class room ambience; efforts to keep students engaged 5

1.1.5 Quality of laboratory experience with respect to

conducting, recording observations (5M); Evaluation

process (5M)

10

1.1.6 Feedback analysis and actions taken ( CRC/ Student feed

back) (5M); Impact of action recorded (5M)

10

1.2 Quality of end semester examination, internal semester question papers, assignments and

evaluation (25)

1.2.1 Process of internal semester question paper setting,

scheme of evaluation and its compliance

5

1.2.2 Question paper validation to ensure desired standard from

outcome attainment perspective as well as learning levels

perspective

5

1.2.3 Mapping of questions with the Course outcomes 5

218

S.

No

Description Max

marks

Marks

awarded

Remarks

1.2.4 Assignments to promote self-learning, survey of contents

from multiple sources, assignment evaluation and feedback

to the students, mapping with the COs

10

1.3 Quality of student projects (25)

1.3.1 Guide allocation and Projects identification strategies 5

1.3.2 Continuous monitoring mechanism and evaluation (5M),

Methodology(Appropriately documented) to assess

individual contribution/understanding of the project as well

as collective contribution/understanding {Process to assess

individual and team performance}(5M)

10

1.3.3 Projects classification (application, product, research,

review etc.) consideration to factors such as environment,

safety, ethics, cost, standards and mapping with program

outcomes and program specific outcomes

5

1.3.4 Quality of journal where the paper has been published

/quality of competition in which award has been won for

the projects

5

1.4 Industry related interaction (30)

1.4.1 Industry supported laboratories 5

1.4.2 Industry involvement in the program design and

Curriculum.

5

1.4.3 Industry involvement in partial delivery of any regular

courses for students

5

1.4.4 Impact analysis of industry institute interaction and actions

taken thereof

5

1.4.5 Industrial /internship /summer training of more than two

weeks and post training Assessment

5

1.4.6 Impact analysis of industrial training 5

1.5 Factors related to Outcome based education (85)

1.5.1 Explanation of Articulation matrix for CO s and POs and

also fixing proper attainment levels of PO, PSO and PEO

assessment.

5

1.5.2 Coverage and quality of all direct and indirect assessment

tools for POs and PSOs (Such as COs, projects, placements,

higher education etc., for direct assessment and recruiter,

alumni, employer, parents etc., for indirect assessment).

Reasonable sample size is critical for each tool

10

1.5.3 Updating the data of CO / PO/PSO assessment in a time

bound manner and action / measures taken and impact

15

1.5.4 Initiatives for student awareness on OBE (5M) and

verification of student awareness i.e. impact analysis (10M)

15

1.5.5 CO attainment tools based on internal exam evaluation(10)

+ external examination (30) {Based on assessment on

performance of students question wise in both cases}

40

1.6 Laboratory facilities (35)

219

S.

No

Description Max

marks

Marks

awarded

Remarks

1.6.1 Maintenance and overall ambience (to check physically

whether the equipment is working)

10

1.6.2 Safety initiatives in laboratories 10

1.6.3 Facilities (additional equipment) created for improving the

quality of learning

15

2. Student Performance: (Max-200)

S.

No

Description Max

marks

Marks

awarded

Remarks

2.1 Success rate(90)

2.1.1

a) Success rate of students who cleared programme

without backlogs in any year of study including lateral

entry=20×(Students graduated / Students admitted)

20

b) Improvement in success rate from previous years 5

2.1.2 a) Success rate in any year of study including lateral

entry=15×(Students graduated / Students admitted)

15

b) Improvement in success rate from previous years 5

2.1.3 Academic Performance in Third Year

Academic Performance = 1.5 * API (Academic

Performance Index)

API = (3rd Year Grade Point Average of all successful

Students on a 10 point scale X number of successful

students)/number of students appeared in the

examination)

15

2.1.4 Academic Performance in Second Year {Same as

above formula in 2.1.3}

15

2.1.5 Academic Performance in First Year { Same as above

formula in 2.1.3}

15

2.2 Student enrollment

(>=90% - 15M; >=80% - 10M; >=70% - 5M; otherwise

– 0)

15

2.3 Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship:

50 X (students placed + admitted to higher studies +

3 X entrepreneurs ) / (Total students)

50

2.4 Achievements in curricular, co-curricular and extra- curricular activities (45)

2.4.1 International Level (Paper, model presentation etc.) I

Prize = 15M, II Prize = 10M, III Prize = 5M,

For Participation = 1M

220

S.

No

Description Max

marks

Marks

awarded

Remarks

2.4.2 National Level (Paper, model presentation etc.) I Prize

= 10M, II Prize = 5M, III Prize = 2M,

For Participation of 5 members = 1M

45

2.4.3 State Level (Paper, model presentation etc.) I Prize =

5M, II Prize = 3M, III Prize = 1M, For Participation of 10

members 1M

3 Faculty contributions: (Max-275)

S. No Description Max

marks

Marks

awarded

Remarks

3.1 Research Guidance (20)

3.1.1 M.Phil / M.Tech./ (4M / candidate )

3.1.2 Ph.D. (10 M/ candidate)

3.2 Research Projects (40)

3.2.1 Major (More than 10 lakhs) 15M / project

25

3.2.2 Minor (5M/ project)

3.2.3 Patents (5 M/ patent) 5

3.3 Consultancy:

More than 2 Lakhs : 10 marks

< 2 lakhs: 5 marks

10

3.4 Publications(75)

3.4.1 Books, book chapters (5M / each chapter) 10

3.4.2 Publication in journals:

Marks awarded=40 X P/F

F : number of faculty,

P=0.5P1+0.5P2;

Where P1 = { PW, PS}

P2=no. of publications reported in Indian citation index,

UGC list of journal,

PW : No. of publications reported in Web of science, SCI

PS : No. of publications reported in Scopus

40

221


marks

Marks

awarded

Remarks

3.4.3 Quality publications:

QP = 15 ×p (CC/P) + 5 × p(NCI) + 5 × p(TOP25P)} Here CC is Total Citation Count over previous 3

years. P is total number of publications over this period as

computed for PU. CC, NCI and TOP25P computed as follows :

CC = 0.45CCW + 0.45CCS + 0.1CCI NCI = 0.5 NCIW + 0.5 NCIS TOP25P = 0.5 TOP25PW + 0.5 TOP25PS NCI: Field normalized citation index averaged over

the previous 3 years. TOP25P: Number of citations in top 25 percentile

averaged over the previous 3 years.

25

3.5 Papers presented in seminars / conferences (30)

3.5.1 International (max 20)

3M / paper

30

3.5.2 National (max 10)

1M / paper

3.6 Seminars / Conferences / Workshops / Symposia wherein served as Resource person (20)

3.6.1 Keynote Speaker / Chairman / Co-Chairman /

Distinguished Guest / Key Speaker / Lead Discussant

International: 4M/session (max 20) ; National:

2M/session (max 10)

3.7 Membership in editorial boards and number of papers

reviewed (5M / paper)

10

3.8 Membership / executive positions in professional

bodies and their related activities (5M / activity)

10

3.9 Development activities (product development,

instructional materials, working models, charts,

monogram etc.) 2M/activity

10

3.10 Guest lectures delivered by faculty

Industry / research institutes / universities

5M / lecture

10

3.11 Awards and honors (only academic bodies and Govt.

Organizations) 10M/award

10

3.12 Faculty Qualification

FQ =2 x [(10X +6Y)/F)] where X is the no. of regular

faculty with Ph.D., Y is the no. of regular faculty with M.Tech., F is no. of regular faculty required to comply

1:15 Faculty Student ratio

20

222


marks

Marks

awarded

Remarks

3.13 Faculty participation in Faculty development/training

activities/STTPs

A Faculty scores maximum five points for participation

Participation in 2 to 5 days FDP: 3 M Participation>5 days FDP: 5 M

Assessment = 3×Sum of points/0.5RF where RF is required faculty as per 1:15 ratio

20

4. Co-curricular activities: (Max-100)


marks

Marks

awarded

Remarks on

non

compliance

4.1 Expert faculty / industrial heads visits

From Foreign universities / IITs, NITs /research

organizations / companies (5M/ visit)

From universities (4M / visit)

15

4.2 International / national Events organized

5 / event 15

4.3 Department Journal / News letter / Magazine /

Website 5

4.4 Certificate programmes / short term programmes

organized 10M /programme 15

4.5 Alumni association meetings 5

4.6 Contributions from Alumni

(Technical collaboration / employment providers / aid

for infrastructure improvement / scholarships)

5

4.7 Extension activities (participation of faculty &

students in community services) 10

4.8 MoU’s / Joint programmes signed (5M / MoU) 5

4.9 Adjunct faculty (Minimum 30 Hrs engagement

/semester) (10M / faculty) 10

4.10 Student activity clubs and their related activities (5M

/ activity) 15

223

5. Student support systems: (Max-100)

S.

No

Description Max

marks

Marks

awarded

Remarks

5.1 Mentoring system:

Efficacy of the system (5M), impact analysis (10M)

15

5.2 Feedback analysis and reward /corrective measures taken, if any and impact analysis

(20)

5.2.1 Feed back on facilities (2M) and corrective

measures (3M)

5

5.2.2 Feedback from recruiters (2M) and corrective

measures (3M)

5

5.2.3 Feedback from employers (2M) and corrective

measures (3M)

5

5.2.4 Feedback from Alumni (2M) and corrective

measures (3M)

5

5.3 Self learning (15)

5.3.1 Scope for self-learning 5

5.3.2 The facilities provided such as materials for

learning beyond syllabus, Webinars, Podcast,

MOOCs etc. and demonstrate its effective

utilization

10

5.4 Career Guidance, Training, Placement (20)

5.4.1 Availability of career guidance facilities 5

5.4.2 Counseling for higher studies (GATE/GRE, GMAT,

etc.)

3

5.4.3 Pre-placement training (6M) 6

5.4.4 Placement process and support (6M) 6

5.5 Entrepreneurship Cell (10)

5.5.1 Entrepreneurship initiatives 6

5.5.2 Data on students benefitted 4

5.6 Grievance redressal system for the students and

action taken

10

5.7 New facilities created / development in the

departments (common rooms, study rooms,

project rooms, department library etc.)

10

6. Continuous Improvement (Max-50)


marks

Marks

awarded

Remarks

6.1 PO And PSO attainment {2M For Each 1% Increase} 10 6.2 Pass percentage{ 2M For Each 1% Increase} 10

6.3 Intake: ( Improvement in mean rank in open category- 5M) + (>95% seats filled -5M 90-95% seats filled – 3M, and below 90% - 0M)

10

224

6.4 Student Placements, Higher Studies & Entrepreneurship {1M For Each 1% Increase}

10

6.5 Faculty Publications {1M For Each 1% Increase} 10 7. Innovative / Best practices and their impact (Max-25) S. No Description Max

marks

Marks

awarded

Remarks

7.1 Describe the best practices the department claims

to have a niche for itself in the areas such as

Teaching learning process, community

engagement, co-curricular activities, evaluation,

feedback system, Student participation in other

activities, Alumni activities etc.,

10

7.2 The impact of such activities 15

225

Annexure-16 Table B 8.4.2 Record of Course Outcome Attainment (I Year Courses)

CAY 2018-19

Course CO

Attainment

CIV111 English

CIV111.1 1.6

CIV111.2 1.6

CIV111.3 2

CIV111.4 1.3

CIV111.5 1.6

CIV112 Engineering

Mathematics – I

CIV112.1 1.3

CIV112.2 1

CIV112.3 1.7

CIV112.4 0.4

CIV112.5 1.4

CIV113 Engineering Physics

CIV113.1 0.4

CIV113.2 1.3

CIV113.3 0.7

CIV113.4 1.3

CIV113.5 1.7

CIV114 Engineering Drawing

CIV114.1 1.6

CIV114.2 1

CIV114.3 1

Course CO

Attainment

CIV114.4 0.7

CIV114.5 0.7

CIV115 Environmental Sciences

CIV115.1 2.6

CIV115.2 1.6

CIV115.3 2.2

CIV115.4 2

CIV115.5 1.6

CIV116 Engineering Physics Lab

CIV116.1 2.6

CIV116.2 2.6

CIV117 Programming With C Lab

CIV117.1 1.8

CIV117.2 2.6

CIV117.3 2.6

CIV117.4 1.8

CIV118 Workshop

CIV118.1 2.6

CIV118.2 2.6

CIV118.3 2.6

CIV118.4 3

CIV121 Engineering

Mathematics-II

226

Course CO

Attainment

CIV121.1 1.9

CIV121.2 1.7

CIV121.3 0.7

CIV121.4 0.7

CIV121.5 0.4


CIV122.1 1

CIV122.2 1

CIV122.3 1

CIV122.4 1

CIV122.5 1

CIV122.6 0.4

CIV123 Professional Ethics And

Human Values

CIV123.1 2

CIV123.2 1

CIV123.3 1.0

CIV123.4 2

CIV123.5 2

CIV124 Mathematics For Civil

Engineers

CIV124.1 1.3

CIV124.2 0.7

CIV124.3 1.3

CIV124.4 1.6

CIV124.5 1

Course CO

Attainment

CIV125 Civil Engineering

Materials

CIV125.1 1

CIV125.2 0.9

CIV125.3 0


Lab

CIV126.1 2.6

CIV126.2 2.6

CIV127 Language Lab

CIV127.1 1.6

CIV127.2 2

CIV127.3 1.6

CIV127.4 2

227

Annexure-17

CAYm1 (2017-18)

228

CAYm2 (2016-17)

229

CAYm3 (2015-16)

230

Annexure-18

232

Annexure-19

Organizational Chart

233

Annexure-20

Grievance and Redressal Committee Members

Name Address & Contact no.

Prof. T. V. Hanumantha Rao Principal ANITS

Sangivalasa, Bheemunipatnam Visakhapatnam Contact No.: 9441011735, 08933-225085 Email: [email protected] [email protected]

Prof. B. Nagaraju HoD, Mechanical Engineering ANITS

Sangivalasa, Bheemunipatnam Visakhapatnam Contact No. 9849820049 Email: [email protected]

Dr. G Sarvani V Swamy English & Humanities ANITS, Member


Mr. A.A.Santhosh Kumar Asst. Admn. Officer (Member) ANITS, Member


Mr. P. Virender Student (Member) Regd No: 315126514121 B.Tech. IV/IV EEE ANITS

H.No:2-206/1, Arun Complex Opp. Suryamahal Theatre, Vakalapudi Kakinada, West Godavari 9492506809, 9492506809

Ms. K S S N V Varalakshmi Student (Member) Regd. No: 315126502011 B. Tech.. – IV/IV – Ch.E, ANITS

H.No: 18-73-56, LIG – 251 APHB Colony, Pedagantyada Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Cell:9703429971, 9581575997

Anil Neerukonda Institute of Technology & Sciences (Autonomous) (Affiliated to AU, Approved by AICTE & Accredited by NBA & NAAC with ‘A’ Grade)

SANGIVALASA-531 162, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District

Phone: 08933-225083/84/87 Fax: 226395

Website: www.anits.edu.in email: [email protected]






http://www.anits.edu.in/


undergraduate engineering program (tier-ii) nba sar july 2019 .pdfself-assessment report (sar)...

Documents