unclassified ad 435688 - dtic-zc-d electrical ererg , produced high magnetic fields about an appro-j...
TRANSCRIPT
UNCLASSIFIED
AD 435688
DEFENSE DOCUMENTATION CENTERFOR
SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION
CAMERON STATION, ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA
wUNCLASSIFIED
NOTICE: When government or other drawings, speci-ficati ons or other data are used for any purposeother than in connection with a definitely relatedgovernment procurement operation, the U. S.Government thereby incurs no responsibility, nor anyobligation whatsoever; and the fact that the Govern-ment may have formulated, furnished, or in any waysupplied the said drawings, specifications, or otherdata is not to be regarded by implication or other-wise as in any manner licensing the holder or anyother person or corporation, or conveying any rightsor permission to manufacture, use or sell anypatented invention that may in any way be relatedthereto.
00 ASD TR 8-111 (X) ASr[ INTERIM REPORT 8-111 (X) III (N)
0APRIL 1964
ELECTRO - SPARK EXTRUDING
J.H, WAGNER
"| REPUBLIC AVIATION CORPORATIONJ MANUFACTURING RESEARCH
*" CONTRACT: AF 33(657)11265
CD ASD PROJECT: 8-111
|r3 INTERIM PROGRESS REPORT
I JANUARY 1964 to I APRIL 1964
Q .J The effects of shock loading on a thick walled cylinder at an internal nal
pressure of 230, 000 psi hydrostatic pressure are analysed. A container *r
geometry it proposed. DDC
BASIC INDUSTRY BRANCHMANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY
Co AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS DIVISIONUNITED STATES AIR FORCE
WRIGHT- PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE , OHIO
A
ASD TR 8-111 ASD INTERIM REPORT 8-111 (III) 3-111 (111)April, 1964
ELECTRO-SPARK EXTRUDING
J. Wagner
Republic Aviation CorporationManufacturing Research Department
Contract AF33(657) 11265ASD Project 8-111
Interim Technical Engineering Report No. 3
1 1 January 1964 - 1 April 1964
Republic Aviation Corporation Report No. RAC ZZ88
The effects of shock loading on a thick wailed cvl,.xder at an internal internalI pressure of ?C , 000 psi hydrostatic pressure are analysed. A container rntainer
geometry is proposed.
U
I BASIC INDUSTRY BRANCHMANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY
Aeronautical Systems Division (AFSC)United States Air Force
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio
3I
IABSTRACT-SUMMARY ASD INTERIM REPORT 8-111 (I1) -'ORT 8-Ill (I11)Interim Technical April, 1964Progress Report No. 3
ELECTRO-SPARK EXTRUDING
J. Wagner
IRepublic Aviation Corporation
IThe spark gap discharge phenomena as applied to experimental extrusion ental extrusionare reviewed. The equations derived for a thick walled cylinder under ,linder undertransient internal loading are applied to check the stress levels encountered evels encountered3 in two proposed experimental extrusion devices. The st'ength requireatie.Ongth requirementsof the equipment are reviewed and arah.yseu with both static and dynamic c and dynamic
I Jloaaug. A container concept is presented.
IIII
NOTICE
I
When Government drawings, specifications or other data are us
for any purpose other than in connection with a definitely related Gove
ment procurement operation, the United States Government thereby in
no responsibility nor any obligation whatsoever; and the fact that the
Government may have formulated, furnished, or in any way supplied t
said drawings, specifications, or other data, is not to be regardee' by
im-lication or otherwise as in any manner licensing the holder or any
other person or corporation or conveying any ights or permission to
manufacturc, use or sell any patented invention that may in any way b
related thereto.
The work reported in this document has been made possible thrc
the support and sponsorship extended by the Air Materiel Command ur
I Contract No. AF33(657)11265. It is published for technical inforrmatic
only and does not necessarily represent recommendations or conclush
of the sponsoring agency.
I Oualified requesters may obtain copies of this report from Defei
Documentation Center, Cameron Station, Alexandria, Virginia.
I Copies of ASD Technical Reports should not be returned to fl-.
Aeronautical Systems Divisio ' -.nless return is required by security
considerations, contractual obligations, or notice on a specific docum
II!I
I
NOTICE
F
When Government drawings, specifications or other data are used
for any purpose other than in connection with a definitely related Govern-
ment procurement operation, the United States Government thereby incurs
no responsibility nor any obligation whatsoever; and the fact that the
Government may have formulated, furnished, or in any way supplied the
said drawings, specifications, or other data, is not to be regarded by
implication or otherwise as in .ny manner licensing the holder or any
other person or corporation or conveying any rights or permission to
manufactuie, use or sell any patented invention that may in any way bez elated thereto.
The work reported in this document has been made possible through
the support and sponsorship extended by the Air Materiel Command under
i Contract No. AF33(657)11265. It is puzlished for technical information
only and does not necessarily represent recommendations or conclusions
of the sponsoring agency.
5 Oualified requesters may obtain copies of this report from Defense
Documentation Center, Cameron Station, Alexandria, Virginia.
I Copies of A3D i'echnical R~ports should no. be returned to the
Aeronautical Systems Division unless return is required L; security3 considerations. contLactual obligations, or notice on a specific document.
IIII
I
I
FOREWORD
This Interim Technical Progress Report covers the work performedunder Contract AF33(657)11265 from January I, 1964 to April 1, 1964.It is published for technical information only and does not necessarilyrepresent the recommendations, conclusions or approval of the Air Force.
This contract with Republic Aviation Corporation of Farmingdale, NewYork, was initiated under ASD Manufacturing Technology LaboratoryProject 8-Ili, "Electro Spark Extruding." It is administered under thedirection of Mr. T.S. Felker of the Basic Industry Branch MATB,Manufacturing Technology Laboratory, Aeronautical Systems Division,Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.
Mr. J. H. Wagner of the Manufacturing Research Department, RepublicAviation Corporation is the engine,,r in charge of the project. Mr. GunthertPfanner is coope rating ip the res(-arch.
The transient wave analysis presented in this report was done by Mr. B. P.l.eftheris of Re-entry Simulation Laboratory, Research Division.
Th( primary objective of the Air Force Manufacturing Methods Programis to increase producibility, and to improve the quality and efficiencyof fabrication of aircraft, missiles and components ther(of. This reportis being disseminated in order that methods and/or equipment developedmay be used throughout industry, thereby reducing costs and giving"MORE AIR FORCE PER DOLLAR."
Your comments are solicited on the potential utilization of the informationcontained herein as applied to your present or future production programs.Suggestions concerning additional manufacturing methods developmentr(quired on this or other subjects will be appreciated.
PUBLICATION REVIEW /
j Approved by-&Robert W. Hussa, Ass't. ChiefManufacturing Rsch. Engineer
Approved by:T. F. Irriholz, Chief -
Mfg. Rsch. Engr. "x
I
II
I
]I CONTENTS
SECTION Page
INTRODUCTION 1
BASIC EQUIPMENT DESIGN 5
1. The Spark Discharge Extrusion Concept 5
2. Effect of Shock Loading in ContainerCavity Dimensions 7
3. Combined Effect of Internal Detonativeand Hydrostatic Loading 11
4. Replaceable Liner Construction 13
STATUS OF THE WORK 16
REFERENCE 17
APPENDIX 19
Calculation for Strain Deformation Dueto Transient Wave 19
Calculations Showing Combined Effect ofImpulse and Static Loading 35
DDISTRIBUTION 41l!
IUII
i
INTRODUCTION
Electro-spark extrusion is a metalforming concept involving re-
covery of the energy derived from a rapid discharge of capacitor stored
electrical power by reduction of a metal billet through an appropriate die.
One method, the electrohydraulic reduction of the billet, places the
extrudable material in an ultra-high pressure fluid environment with the
rapid energy lischarge occurring across a suitable electrode gap. This
short time duration gap discharge in a properly designed high strength
container cai.ses a shock-pressure wave to strike the billet face and,
upon reflection, to initiate parti-kle acceleration in the billet material
and to release to the billet face some of the intrinsic kinetic and pressure
energy available as a consequence of known wave reflection parameters.
The sum of these phenomena when added to the potential energy present
j in the high fluid pressure environment have been shown by mathematical
analysis to be ample under carefuDy controlled conditions to cause a
metal billet to yield and to extrude a given length for the time duration
of one electrical pulse. The problem of maintaining extrusion then
properly becomes one of providing sufficient discrete pulse discharges
with the correct time interval to allow a constant velocity extrusion.
In addition, the capacitor discharge equipment can be alternately
employed to produce impulsive electromagnetic forces upon the billet in
the hydrostatic container. In this method, the rapid discharge of the
-zc-d electrical ererg , produced high magnetic fields about an appro-
priately constructed conductive coil. By induction, to a con.luc,-Ve
j pistoi.-disc i.terposed ietween the coil and the billet, epulsive magnetic
forces rapidly accelerate the disc and thereby drive a pressure wa -
against the billet.
As an alternative, where the billet material is sufficiently conductive.3 the electromagnetic repulsion may be coupled to the billet face directly in
order to induce the ac,.eleration forces required to extrude the billet.
A third method of capacitor stored energy utilization is to recover
the energy created by the electrohydraulic discharge and to transfer it
!
!
by mechanical means to the billet. Displacement of the billet is accom-
plished mechanically by the use of a piston-ram on the billet material in
a suitable container. The pressure pulse or electromagnetic ener y
created by a series of discharges impinges on the face of the piston causing
it to move forward to extrude the billet.
The advantages offered by the foregoing approach to electrohydraulic
extrusion are: (1) elimination of billet container wall friction, (2) re-
duction of billet die surface friction, (3) creation of pressures consider-
ably beyond those obtained hydrostatically, (4) reduced container size and
cost. 1
To determine the production potential for extruding a steel alloy by
the use of capacitor stored energy, the Aeronautical Systems Division iof Wright Patterson Air Force Base has awarded Contract No. AF33(656)-
11265 to Republic Aviation Corporation. Extrusion will be attempted in
the course of the program by conducting experiments with capacitor dis-
charge equipment to develop the most suitable techniques for metal reduc-
tion by several electrohydraulic methods. The program consists of two
phases as follows:
Phase I - Design of the Extrusion Equipment
Phase!! - Development of the Extrusion Process
The approaches mentioned in the foregoing are to be Thoroughly
investigated for suitability t'ward attaining the objectives of the program; Ii. e., extrusion of a 2 inch diameter to a 1/4 inch round.
Mathematical treatment of the electrohydraulic pulse extrusion case I(Reference 1) produned a descriptive equation containing a combinatiot, of
dynamic and static variables generally similar to the well known equation
used for static extrusion ( P = K In -A- ) . In the static extrusion case,
the pressure is raised until extrusion starts; while in the p.lse extrusion
case, the pulse propagates through the billet imparting a motion to the
billet. The extrusion produced for one pulse depends npon the pressure
amplitude, while the final extruded length depends upon the rate thepulses are generated.
1
From the foregoing, it is apparent that achievement of the totalenergy necessary to extrude a target section requires multiple electrical
discharges. The time between discharges should be minimum to reduce
the overall extrusion time and avoid stop-start extrusion. In order to
optimize these requirements, it is necessary to modify the 156, 000 joule
Republic Aviation capacitor discharge facility to include the necessary
equipment to allow faster charging rates and to design a switching
arrangement and duty cycle timer to favor the rapid cyclical release ofstored energy at precisely timed intervals.
The theory of unsteady waves, (Reference 1) used to develop workingequations for computing the radial and hoop strains in hollow cylindersunder transient internal loads indicated that pressure vessel design
requirements to contain dynamic forces superposed over high hydrostaticpressures was possible and practicable. This analysis pointed up desirable
container dimensional geometry and indicated an order of magnitude of
mechanical properties for the materials in the critical areas of the chamber.1 These criteria have been formulated into general design requirements andare presented in this report.
I3
!|!
II!1!
uI
At 0
E-43U)
i14
u
0
I1
DESIGN OF A PRESSURE VESSELFOR ELECTROHYDRAULIC EXTRUSION
A. Basic Equipment Design
1. The Spark Discharge Extrusion Concept
To accomplish extrusion, power is initially supplied to a capa-
citor bank and the stored charge held off by a suitable switch until re-
leased to the high pressure device containing an open gap electrode, an
extrusion die and a metal billet. The billet is maintained under high
hydrostatic pressure defined by the mechanical properties of the part-
icular extrudable material used and the degree of metal reduction required.
Once the storage of energy is completed, the discharge event begins when
a trigger switch (vacuum gap) is ionized and current flows into the circuit,
thereby ionizing the high fluid pressure gap between the electrodes (refer
to Figure 1). A spark channel is abruptly created and the vapor products
in the channel expand into a spherical "gas bubble." The inertia of the
circumjacent fluid coupled with the extremely high velocity of expansion
of the "gas bubble" produces a compression shock wave in the surrounding
liquid. This compressed water layer then travels through the liquid as
a shock pressure front at approximately acoustic velocity with a time
duration of approximately 20 microseconds.
The energy relea d by the gap discharge consists of kinetic energy
plus the energy due to the increased pressure in the traveling wave. At
the billet face the pressure approximately doubles because of the rein-
forcement of the incident and reflected waves. The shock presoure wave
splits into a reflected pulse back into the fluid and a transmitted pulse*
forward into the billet material. The billet attains, by the same phenomena
as the fluid, a particle velocity sufficient to cause longitudinal movement
for a length proportional to the energy released.
The very benefits derived from the shock pressure pulse in extrusion(i. e., particle velocity sufficient to cause plastic strain and movement of
the billet)become a limiting factor when applied directly to the structure3 in the pressure vessel walls. As the cylinder is initially under high
5
) 1
U)
0 1
Lo
ca)
U)
6
Iinternal static pressures the effects of the superposed dynamic loading
become critical. Results of the analysis completed in subject Reference I,
indicated a practical container geometry is attainable to withstand the
explosive forces from an electrical gap discharge event.
The illustration (Figure 1) shows the spark discharge extrusion
process and equipment in a conceptual manner. A capacitor bank to
supply the energy, a high pressure chamber, pumping system and asso-
ciated controls are shown.
2. Effect of Shock Loading in Container Cavity Dimension
Equations have been previously derived and calculations prepared
in Reference 1 for the general problem of a thick-walled cylinder under the
influence of a transient internal load where the unbalanced forces from a
detonative capacitor discharge set up velocity gradients in part of the
cylinder while the remainder is completely at rest. The problem has
been formulated and explicit solutions given for elastic and elasto-plastic
j cases. These specialized interpretations are presented in Appendix I
for reference.
With the aforementioned analysis in mind, a tentative pressure
vessel construction (Figure 2) using a single shrink shroud of 4340 steel
(24 inch 0. D.) over an 18% Ni. maraging steel liner (2 inch I. D.) with a static
internal pressure of ZOO 000 psi was derived using the customary Lame
equations. A desirable residual compressive hoop stress resulting from
the -nmbination of shrin!. .it assembly and cold work fabrication proced-
ures in the most highly stressed portion of the apparatus, (th,, inside
diameter; r o = I inch) wa-: raquired to withstand safely hydrostatic internal
pressures LO the maximum amount of 200, 000 psi.
The question of a serviceable design to contain the forces re-
leased by the discharge of electrical capacitor stored energy in addition
to the loading imposed on the equipment by the high order of hydrostatic
"ressure presented a problem to which no exact solution could be found.
For this reason, the mathematical analysis, Reference (l),was preparedto predict the effects of detonative shock loads on a container using normal
I
I
construction materials of significant mechanical strength values.
This analysis indicated that residual hoop stresses result in
the container walls from reaction of the metal to the passing of a maximum
detonative shock pressure pulse. The maximum response occurs at the
fluid metal interface at the internal radius (r o = I inch) where the pressure
pulse is greatest. The material has been shown by the analysis to exper-
ience first plastic flow in the outward direction and then inward, thus T
giving rise to 'he possibility of secodary yielding. |
Reference to Case I in Anpendix I, the hoop strain for zero Istress (permanent set) is 0. 0036. The residual strain after unloading
is 0. 00463 (com)ression). The diagram for this set of conditions indicates
that a permanent set to a residual compressive stress level at the bore
-.05 \60a.0 0 38
--.0046/ .065 .01 .015
1I
- 253,000 PSI HOO
of 53, 000 psi. This is a value greater than the ultimate strength of the
liner material (250, 000 psi) being considered without the addition of Ihydrostatic pressure. Therefore, the assembly shown in Figure Z is
proven unsatisfactory, because of the high degree of deformation present
-t the critical location r o 1 inch from the action of the passing of the
shock wave. IAs the reverse yielding at r o 1 inch has been shown to be beyond
8
iI
the mechanical property values of 18% Ni. maraging steels, it is of interest
to find a radius where the severity of the shock wave has been sufficiently
diminished so as to present a less drastic effect on the walls of the pressure
container. A plot, Figure 3 of the particle velocity against the radius in
the container wall indicates that the particle velocity attenuates rapidly from
its initial critical value of u = 2864 inches per second. It is reasonable to
assume that a wall radius can be found where the effect of the particle
velocity on the container walls is reduced to the degree that severe deform-
ations do not occur from the loading-unloading cycle of the trnsient wave.
The curve changes slope between the values r = 2 and r = 3 inches. At
r = 3 inches, a 40% attenuation has diminished the particle velocity to a
value of 1654 inches per second. This value of r o = 3 inches was selected
for analysis.
The calculations for an r o = 3 inches are outlined in Appendix
I, Case (2).
The hoop strain imposed at r o = 3 inches from the action of the
loading wave where the pressure has attenuated to 248, 280 psi has been
jshown using the concept of elastic recovery to be equal to zero, thus
indicating no permanent set in the hoop direction from the loading wave
action. Due to the unloading there is elastic recovery strain in the amount
of 0. 00368 (compression). The equivalent stress for this strain value is
SI 10, 000 psi (compression). The significance of this is that a permanent
-009 -+.005
100,000'1lOtOOOPSi
200,000
residual hoop stress (compression) due to the action of the wave remains
at the inside diameter of the chamber (r o = 3 inc;hes). If there were no
9
1U!
r- I inch
3000. r any radius
u= particle velocity at r,
2800.
I
2400--
2000
0
0
> 1600
800-
II II" t
02 3 4 5
Container Radius, r (Irtches)
FIGURE 3
p)I
!considcra'ions, other than hoop stress, the pressure vessel at ro = 3 inches
I could elastic-lly withstand dynamic stresses from -110, 030 psi to the yield
point of the material, 250, 000 psi or a total of 360, 000 psi in the hoop
direction.
It must be remembered that the analysis outlined in the Appendix
I indicates the condition in the pressure vessel walls at ro = 3 inches. This
case is for the same wave (at a later period in time) as was analyzed for
ro = 1 inch. The particle velocity and the pressure, of course, are atten-
uated from'passage through the material of the pressure vessel walls.
Although the calculations show a small residual compressive stress of
30, 000 psi, this value can be disregarded if we consider r, = 3 inches to
be the container cavity dimension at the fluid-metal interface. (This will
be made further evident in the following section.1
3. Combined Effect of Internal Detonative and Hydrostatic Loading
Because the shock wave loading by itself has been previously
jshown to behave elastically between 110, 000 and the yield point of the
material in the wall at r o = 3 inches, it becomes of interest to subject
1' the stresses produced from a combination of the dynamic and static
loading to analysis to see if the coupling can be accomplished without
i failure in the wall. The calculations for this are outlined in Appendix Ir.
The work indicates that a compressive pre-stress in Lhe hoop
direction of approximatrly 133, 000 psi must be incorporated in the pressure
vessel cunstruction by some method to insure that failure will not occur
at r o = 3 inches as a result of the combining of the hydrostatic and dynamic
loading. This order of compression stress is to be obtained by thp, use of
carcful shrink fit procedures in addition to appropriate autofrettage of the
inner liner prior to assembly. As an interference shrink fit constructionwill be used. The interference must be calculated commensurate with
ordinary assembly procedures. In addition, the residual stress level
after shrink and at pressure must be maintained so that this area xill not
3 be subject to failure during usage.
II
P 430, 000 %
u = 2864 11 - P~ 248, 240
u 1654
r = Iinch
r~p
r =3 inches/
FIGURE 4
121
1
4. Re-,Aaceable Liner Construction
The analyses and calculations presented for r o 1 ir.h and
ro = 3 inches container dimensions have considered the decay of one
transient detonative shock wave in a cylinder from a point at the pressur-
ized fluid-metal interface outward for a distance of three inches. Figure 4
shows the respective condition of one wave at r o = 1 inch and r o = 3 inches
at two different instants of time. If we should consider a chamber only of
cavity diameter of 6 inches (r o = 3 inches) the pressure upon reflection
would again be 430. 000 psi and the effect on the container wall would be
too severe to contemplate for th- proposed experiments. If we, however,
take the maximum pressure (430, 000 psi) at the 2 inch diameter and allow
the effects (particle velocity and pressure) to attenuate by some means,
the consequences of the event at the 6 inch diameter interface can be
I tolerated.
The means proposed to mitigate the severity of the shock pulse1 on the wall material is the insertion of a removable liner . inch L D. x
6 inch 0. D. in the pressurized container. This liner will be completely
restrained by the hydrostatically pressurized fluid in the radial, tangential
and axial direction. Such a construction is shown in Figure 5.
SIt is anticipated that over a period of time after a specific
number of maximum duty cycles, the replaceable liner should fail. When
this occurs, the liner c" 1 be removed and a replacement provided.
The initial static and dynamic loading cycle is dopicted graphically
in Figure 6. -3 is the initial prestress at P = 0. Upon the insertion of
preseure into the cavity, the stress is raised ho q 3. The first ,nax-mum
3 discharge resets this stress pattern to the value at cband upon release of
pressure, the residual hoop stress returns to the point of % This is then
3 the permanent working stress in the cavity of the pressure chamber.
1
3 13
z
0
tn t
144
1
Note: Dotted line indicatesloading due to impulse.Solid line indicatesloading due to staticpressure
300-
2-00--
100.O + b =84,000 psi- 3-S Pressure x 10 3 psi' 0
Us-26, 000 psi
100U)
*4) a3= -133,000 psiEn
U 0-243,000 psi
I
STRESS DISTRIBUTION DUE TO STATIC ANDDYNAMIC LOADING
I FIGURE 6
I
j 15
STATUS OF THE WORK
The analyses derived for the effect of detonative shock loading in a
thick walled cylinder hydrostatically loaded have been completed and the
conclusions derived therefrom have been applied to the design of a suitable
piece of equipment to be used in the extrusion experiments.
All vendor proposals for equipment have been reviewed for conform-
ance to specification and suitability of costs, and based upon this review
an agreement has been entered into with Harwood Engineering Company,
Walpole, Massachusetts to develop with Republic Aviation Corporation,
and to manufacture the equipment required for the proposed experiments. 1"ar d _s hac started fabrication of a ZOO, 000 psi high pressure pumping
system to displace 20 in 3 /min. Engineering has been completed in the fdesign of the pressure vessel and work has commenced with the assembly
drawings. These should be ready for detailing early in the next reporting
period.
Work has proceeded with the electrical considerations necessary to
alter the Republic Aviation Corporation 156, 000 joule capacitor bank to
attain suitable charging rates and to release energy to the extrusion
chamber at the repetition rates that are anticipated to be necessary to
accomplish extrusion. This work will continue for the next reporting
period.
1!III
J6
I
REFERENCE
I. "Electra -Spark Extruding," Republic Aviation CorporationReport No. 2027, (ASD TR 8-111 (11), 1 January, 1964
I1
1APPENDIX I
CALCULATION FOR STRAIN DEFORMATIONDUE TO TRANSIENT WAVE
I Statement of the Problem
Consider a thick-walled cylinder with a y= 250,000 psi and the following
dimensions (the cylinder is filled with water):
I INCH
3 INCHES" .. ... ' FIGURE 1
;riangular wave of the following form is transmitted along the cylinder.
i / / 215,000 PSI
2_ISTATIC PRESSURE
This wave reflects upon arrival on a closed end. Find the resulting strains
r ° = I inch and r° = 3 inche-.
The pressure of the rcf.Atd wave front is approximately twice the pressure
of the inciduta. wave front. This is considered the highest possible internal p, ,-
sure; thus, the calculations will be performed for the reflected region only.
To illustrate the wave decay, two cases are analyzed; Case 1, where
r = inch, and Case 2, where r0=3 inches. Hence P=-2(215,000) -430,000
0vsi at to= 1 inch. Using equation (23), we haveI
19
u = 430,00g 00 2864.6 in./sec
I o 0C o0
where po = 0.29 lb/in. 3
Co = 200,000 in./sec
g = 32.2 ft/sec2
From equation (34), the velocity at ro = 3 inches (chosen arbitrarily) is
u3 1 r* 2, 864.0 6 - 1654.0 in./sec 1Thus the pressure at ro = 3 inches is given by
P3 = P = -248,280 psi
A. CASE 1
1. Loading Wave
From equation (28) the density ratio at t = 0 is given by
S 0 Co 2.00 x 105 . 98568P Co- u 2.00x105 - 2864.68
The maximum a1 at the start of plastic deformation is given by
SL= 250, 000 =_Il 1-M = 0;7 -357,143psi
where a = - 250,000 psi
= 0.7
Thus = 1 - 357,143 (1-2x0.3 2 ) = 1- .0119x.82 = .9904230 x 106
at Ory = - 357,143 psi
As soon as the material begins stretching out, the loading becomes plastic.
Considering E = 0 from equation (38), we have
20
, . /00833 .98568 ./0082106 .09061
where y 250,000 = 00833ay =3X 630x 106
Also,2864.6 =. 01432
C 0 2x10 5
Substituting in equation (39), we have
cosh .09061t .,1432 Binh .,061- 1.09061
Since u = d , we have
= .09061 (sinh .09061 .15800 cosh .09061t]
First, the time lt, where fl= 0, is found by plotting 5 versus t.
("ie Figure 2). The 4f versus i plot is shown in Figure 3: it is shown that as
G approaches zero, - approaches a constant value of 0.0125. The radial strain
is given by C1 = - 1: The 1 versus t plot is shown in Figure 4: C, ap-proaches the value of .0264.
2. Unloading Wave
I The duration of the triangular wave is 20 Msec: its equivalent
rectangular profile will have a duration of 10 psec. Hence,
= . 2.0X lO 5 xl x 10- 6 = 2.t ---- =2.0
r 1
It is shown In Figre 2, hc t',cr, that the loading process terminates at 1.75.
Thus, whor, the unloading wave occurs, the material is in equilibrium.
I For the unloading wave, we have the following constants (equation (53)):
= 1: The material returns to its initial volume.
1!
21
I
.0161I
.015
.0140 :5,000p.s.I.
.013
.012
.011 1.0101
.007
.006
.005
.003
.0021
.0011
00 1.0 To 2.01
22 FIGURE 2
I
.016
.015
.014 to: I*_ry- 250,000 p.s.l.
.013
.012
.011 -
.010
.009 -
£ 008
.007 -
.006
i .005 -
1 .004
I .oo /
.003
.02.0
II Z3 FIGURE 3
.03 IIoy 3250,000 P.S.i.
.021
.01
0 1.0 2.0 i
24 FIGURE 41
|I
Hence Of + 4-05+0.303 803
where u 0.303. N.B. The value of 01 after unloading is zeo
= 1 -A= 0.697
y= 0.303
Uo =.01432
= - 1. 0000 - o - 1.0000 - .01432 = - 1.01432
= +4A = 1.71697
.85852
Thus = 303 .43472 and 0 = 0.40150.697 *2
Hence + 9Z(4)= - 1.01432 + 0.4015(.43472)
= - 1.01432 +.17454 = - .83978
and Y ... 83978 - .978195!8.853 2
Also, = .8585 x .43472 = .37321
x =.43472 x .5 = .21736
I Y -. 4015 x .978195 = - .392745
x =, =.43472 x.4015 =.17454
- .978195=- .489097
and 1 - 1=-1+.21736=-.78284
II Z5
T
Hence u = .2"686 sinh .8585t - .79696 cosh .8585t + . 7 8 264 e 4015t
and = e" 4015 t. 43472 cosh .8585 F - 1. 01432 sinh .8565 F J -. 43472
In the plot of U versus , Figure 5, the time when the velocity becomes zero
is shown as io = 0.026 (t= .26x 10-6 sec). Substituting in the equation of e we
find the residual hoop strain, 4f = .01713. Equations (51) and (52) were derived,
however, with ?o = 0 at t 0 (with reference to the equilibrium conditions after
the loading). L
To find the residual hoop strain after unloading, we have: 1S eunloading -9loading
=.01713 - .0125 = .00463 (compression) iIn order to find the residual hoop stress we use the principle of
elastic recovery. Thus, the volumetric strain ev is given by:
ev = (1 + I ' unloading T
where c1 is the radial linear strain change upon relief and 4' is the corresponding
hoop strain. We know, however, the radial unloading stress: i.e., &ao = 430, 000
psi. Hence, c1 = 430,000 0143.30x 106 0
The value of ev Is also known from the loading conditions:
S-v -P- + 1=+.01813
V O PO
Thus, the hoop strain for zero stress (permanent set) is given by
o = ev " Cl = .01813 - .0143 = ,00. I
The corresponding permanent set in the radial direction is
to= .026- .0143 = .012. In the calculations for the unloading wave, it was Jassumed that upon relief the recovery was instantaneous: thus L = 1 at t= 0.
T
i
.015 T - ' I "
UNLOADING
o x 250,000 p. s.i
.01
II.005
I
0 .001 .005 .008 .01 .02 .025
II
27 FIGURE 5
I
IT
Then, for F > 0, r- decreases, changing both hoop and radial strains according toto the following equations:
ro r
Hence, the material will be under the following strain condctios:
HOOP-. 0046 .00)5 .01 .015 HO
-253,000 PSI
Without pursuing this case any further, it Is easily concluded that secondaryyielding will take place. This is undesirable for most designs.
B. CASE 2
The velocity at ro = 3 inches was given as:
u =- 1654.0 and =U 6o 1654 00827
C u .250 000 37 4 s
= C!S- = I1- O= .99173, and % = =367,143 PatCo ~~ 99 7 , (elastic) 0.7
hence, W .00833 x.99173 = 0082611 = .0908906 -_
28
I
Uo .00827 = - .09098851W .0908908
Hence 1 = cosh .0908906t - .0909885 sinh .0908906i - 1
F and a = .0908906 (sinh .0908906t -. 0909885 cosh .0908906 1
The duration of the wave, on the other hand, is given by
= lx10-6 x2x10 5 23 3
where
t = lox 10- 6
C0 = 2x105
r = 3 inches
The u versus t and 4 versus t plots are shown in Figures 6 and 7,
respectively. Another case of Y = 150,000 psi is also shown for comparison.
With the value of f at ro = 3 inches being smaller than at ro = 1 inch,
it is shown that the unloading wave occurs before the material achieves equilibrium.
12.* Unloadling Wave
I Following the same procedure as for r o = 3 inches, with
Co = 0.00827 - .00275* = .00552
4= e" (. 43472 cosh .8585t - .96794 sinh .M5 .43472
and U - .27793 sinh .8585 t + .78816 cosh .8585 t - .78264 e' 4015
The plot of It versus is shown in Figure 8. Comparing this un-loading with that of r o = 1 inch, we see that, at ro = 3 inches, equilibrium is
achieved in about half the time.
S* velocity from the loading process
2| 29
LI
[ ... .... 1 .7.
.008 LOADINGro =3 "
.007-
.006 ___2_-1
.005
.004
.003 M'Y 150,000 p. S i.
.002 _y2 000 .i. /a'y:29,OO i
!.0- O'y :250,000 p s,i.
DOI"
0 1.0 2.030 I
30 FIGURE 6
,009 - - LOADING .ro=3"
.008
.007 -
- 17_ ___ __
e .006 _ _ _ _ _
ycr =50,000 psi.
.007
Ii
1 .5 1.0
it
31 FIGURE 7
.006 "
.005 = 150 000
UNLOADIN I , 000
.004 y 250,0
.004
.002 I
.001
0 -.001 .005 .01 .011 1
I32 FIGURE 8 I
I
The corresponding value of 4 at 1 .01 is =.00727. The i valueat t 0.667 for loading is 4f = .00365. Hence, the resulting strain is (. 00733- .00365) or U" = .00368 (compression).
To find the resulting stresses, the permanent set in both the hoopand radial directions must be found. Employing the concept of elastic recoveryagain, we have
ev = o+1l
C = 2 .0082761 30x10 6=
Furthermore, - ev = + V=- - + 1 =-.99173 + 1 =.00827.
Th11us, eo = 0: This result indicates that there is no permanent set in the hoopdirection. In the radial direction, L = 1+ 1 .= 1+ 00365 = 1.00365 from
loading. Hence - = - - 99636. Also, - =.99173.
c = .99636 x .99173 - 1 = .98812 - 1 = -. 01188 from loading.
1 During the unloading, there is the elastic recovery where c=. 00827:
then, there is the further change of c due to the Lo change.r o o
.::;ric €1 = -- •1 .00827
r 1- 1-.00727=.99373
re 1.0063r
and C1 =.0063 + .00827 = .01457
I
! 3
I
Tbus, change in = .01457 - .0119 = .00265 (tension). The valueof f I when the radial stress is zero is -. 01190 + .00327 . -. 0036.
Residual radial stress = - .0036 + .0026 = - .001 or - .001 x 30 x 106- -30, 000 psi (compression).
The residual hoop stress = .00368 x 30 x 106 = 110,400 psi(compression). From the secondary yielding criterion, we have T
a2 - Ol < cy
or - 30,000 + 110,000 = 80,000 psi. Since Oy was assumed at 250, 000 psi, thematerial will not go through secondary yielding.
1I
I!1
34
1
APPENDIX II
CALCULATIONS SHOWING COMBINED EFFECTOF IMPULSE AND STATIC LOADING
I. Introduction
The combined effect of the action .f a transient shock wave over an
internal hydrostatic pressure in thick walled cylinder is analysed in the
following to verify the structural integrity of a container. The method of
superposition of stress is used.
If we are given a cylinder with the following dimensions:
a =3".'b = 1511
; _a w =b / a = 5 "1IP =internal pressure
(200, 000 psi
I Fo the purpose of discussion, we define the following variables atan internal radius of r. = a = 3 inches:
a, = hoop stress under internal hydrostatic
pressure alone
i b = radial stress under internal hydrostaticpressure alone
aa = residual hoop stress in bore at zero pressure
Sa4 = residual hoop stress resulting from an impulse
C% = 03 + a4 = resultant hoop stress after release ofinternal pressure due to passage of
first maximum shock impulse
I1 35
I
C-- al + Ch + C4 = combined hoop stresses understatic pressure after passage ofimpulses
II Calculation for Stress from Internal Pressure Alone
The equations of Lame may be used to calculate the elastic stresses
in a thick walled cylinder, internally loaded. The relationship for the
hoop stress at the bore states that, T
71 =P w9+T
Then, for a wall thickne:s wv = 5 and an internal pressure of 1P 200, 000 psi
01 =ZOO, 000 x = 17, 000 psi (tension) I
By definition, .1
2= -P - 00, 000 psi (compression)
From the secondary yielding criterion, we have
Oy > C,2 - al
or -Z00, 000 - Z17,000 = -417,000 psi. Since ay was assumed at
250, 000 psi, the material will go through secondary yielding.
However, to reduce the stress to a point under the 250, 000 psiyield stress of the material, we must impose a negative hoop stress in
the bore prior to loading. To bring the bore to a zero hoop stress at an
b-,trr pressure of 230, 000 psi let,
a3 = -Z17,000 psi
Then uzing the Tresca Criterion, we haveOy > O2 -a I
or -200; 000 + 0 = -ZOO, 000 psi. This value is suitably below the
required 250, 000 yield stress. Therefore, the material will not fail andwe can superpose the dynamic loading to predict the final state.
III Continued Dynamic and Static Load -
Previous analysis (Appendix I) has shown that the residual hoop
36 [
I
stress at after discharge (peak pressure, P = 248, 280 psi and time
duration t = 20 1isec is,
O4 = -110,000 psi
The combined hoop stresses ( (7) under static pressure after the
initial capacitor discharge will then be
= (0o1 + o'3) + 04
= 217, 000 -217,000 + (-10, 000)
= -110,000 psi (compression)
the radial stress,
-P = 200, 000 psi (compression)
From Tresca's Criterion, we have,
ay > a 2 - 01
1or -200, 000 - (-110, 000) = -90,000 psi. Since ay is again 250, 000 psi
yielding will not occur in the bore from the combined stresses due to
dynamic aind static forces.
IV Release of Pressure
I Upon the release of the static pressure, the permanent hoop stress
imposed by the first discharge event will reverse by the amount uf .
j Then the -esidual stress with internal pressure P = 0 will be,
a s =(a 3 + N
= -217,00U -110,000
= -317,000 psi (compression)
Since os exceeds the 250, 000 psi yield strength of the material
under the condition of no internal pressure, the bore will yield radially
I inward. This is an unsatisfactory stress condition for cylinder design.
V Solution of the Problem
I Because yielding has occurred at the bore with an initial hoop stress,
a, = 217,000 psi (compression) a cb must be found that will allow elastic
I behavior of the material within the 250, 000 psi yield strength wall material
37
being considered.
Let us calculate a new residual hoop stress % in the bore at no
pressure that will allow the desired elastic action within the limits of
the 250, 000 psi yield strength material. Then
US = or + cb + a4
240,000 = 217,000 + q3 + (-110,000)
a3 = -133,000 psi.
Therefore, the desired value of pressures at the bore o, = 133, 000 psi
(compression) 1'
The combined stress (s) at a pressure P = 200,000 after a maximum
energy impulse is then
as =o +s U + N
= Z17, 000 + (-133, 000) + (-10,000)
= -26, 000 psi (compression)
% = -P = -200, 000psi (compression)
Then using the Tresca Criterion,
ay > (72 - a,
or -200, 000 -(-26, 000) -174, 000. With the c y = 250, 000 psi material,
yielding will not occur in the bore.
To f .d the residuai hoop stress upon release of the 200. 000 psi
static pressure P goes to zero, and the hoop stress is din.-hed by the
amount a, = 217,000 psi. Then
06 aa + 4
b= 133,000 + (-110,000) o
= 243,000 psi
Therefore the bore diameter at r o = a - 3 inches has attained aresidual hoop stress (compression) of 243, 000 psi which is within the
required 250, 000 psi yield strength of the material. The pressure vessel
can be operated safely in the prescribed limits of 200, 000 psi static
pressure and a peak shock pulse of 248, 280 psi for 20 &Jduration.
38
DISTRIBUTION LIST
ASD (ASRCT-10) ASD (ASRCM-34, Mr. S. Inouye)Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio (5) Wright-Patterson APB, OhioASD (ASW, Mr. Hazen A. Miles) ASD (ASRCM-10, Mr. WG. Ramke)Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio Wright-Patterson AFB, OhioASD (ASOP, Mr. J.M. Troyan) ASD (ASRCE, Mr. J. Teres)Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio (2) Wright-Patterson AFB, OhioASD (ASNPFP, Mr. R. Farrington) ASD (ASRC, Dr. A.M. Lovelace)Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio Wright-Patterson AFB, OhioASD (ASRCE-31A, Miss B. Parker) FTD (TD-E2b)Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio Wright-Patterson AFB, OhioAFSC (SCR-2, Mr. C. W. Kniffin) Aerospace Industries AssociationAndrews AFB of America, Inc.Washington 25, D.C. Attn: Mr. S.D. Daniels
Director of Technical ServicesAllegheny Ludlurn Steel Corp. 1725 De Sales Street, NWResearch CenterAttn: Mr. R.K. Pitler Washington 6. D.C.Chief Rsch, Metallurgist Allegheny Ludlum Steel CorporationHigh Temperature Alloys Attn: Extrusion PlantBrackenridge, Pennsylvania Watervliet, New York
Aluminum Company of America Defense Documentation Center (DDC)ALCOA Building Cameron StationAttn: Mr. R. W. Andrews, Jr. Alexandria, Virginia, 22314 (20)Pittsburgh 19, Pennsylvania Babcock & Wilcox CompanyBaldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. Attn: Mr. James BarettPress Department Beaver Falls, PennsylvaniaAttn: Dr. F. J. KentZnginee..ng Manager Barogenics, Inc.Philadelphia 42, Penra. Attn: Mr. Alsa:,%nder ZeitlinVice PresidentBattelle Memori.l Institute 51 East 4Znd StreetMetal Working Division New York 17, N.Y.Attn: Mr.A.M. SabroffAssistant Chief Bureau of Naval Weapons (PID-2)505 King Avenue Navy DepartmentColumbus 1, Ohio Washington 25. D.C.Bureau of Naval Weapons (CS-23) California Institute of TechnologyNavy Department Jet Propulsion LaboratoryAttn: Mr.S.E. 6anfillippo Attn: Mr. I. W. NewlanWashington 25, D.C. 4800 Oak Grove Drive
Pasadena 3, California
4I1I
T
'IT Research Insti~ute P.R. Mallory & Company, Inc.Metals Research Department Attn: Mr.A.S. Doty, DirectorAttn: Mr. Frank A. Crosely Technical Services Laboratories3350 South Federal Street Indianapolis 6, IndianaChicago 16, IllinoisCurtiss-Wright CorporationNational Academy of Science Metals Processing DivisionNational Research Council Attn: Mr.A.D. RoubloffDiv. of Engineering & Industrial Chief Engineer
Resources 760 Northland AvenueAttn: Mr.E.V. Bennett P.0. Box 13Washington 25, D.C. Buffaio 15, New YorkNORAIR Division National Aeronautics & Space Admin.Northrop Corporation Lewis Research CenterAttn: Mr.J.A. Van Hammersveld Attn: Mr. George Mandal, Chief, Library1001 East Broadway 21000 Brookpark RoadHawthorne, California Cleveland 25, OhioNuclear Metals, Inc. North American Aviation, Inc.Attn: Mr. Klein, Vice President Attn: Mr. Walter RhineschildWest Concord, Massachusetts International Airport
Los Angeles 9, CaliforniaNorth American Aviation, Inc.Attn: Plant Engineering Library Oak Ridge National Laboratory43 East Fifth Avenue Metals & Ceramics DivisionColumbus 16, Ohio Attn: Mr.C. W. Thurber
P.O. Box XOregon Metallurgical Corp. Oak Ridge, TennesseeAttn: Mr. Frank VandenburghVice President Reactive Metals ProductsP.O. Box 484 Attn . Mr. G. W. ClevelandAlbany, Oregon Sales Engineer
Pressure Technology Corp. of Arner. Niles, OhioAtta; Mr.Alfed Bobrowski, Pres. Republic Steel Corpo.ation453 Amboy Avenue Research CenterWoodbridge, New Jersey 0709 Attn: Mr.R. W. Kollar6801 Breckyille RoadRepublic Aviation Corporation Clevelanil 31, OhioaAttn: Mr. A. KastelowitzDirector Manufacturing Research Union Carbide Nuclear CompanyFarmingdale, L.I., N.Y. Attn: Mr. Paul E. WilkinsonPo.O. BoxYReynolds Metals Company Oak Ridge, Tennessee918 16th Street, N.W.Was'ington 6, D.C.
Lombard CorporationYoungstown, Ohio
I42 5
I
The Cleveland Twist Drill Company Dow Chemical Company
Attn: Mr. Robert P. Lesher Metallurgical LaboratoryDevelopment Engineer Attn: Dr. T.E. Leontis
P.O. Box 6656 Assistant to the DirectorCleveland 1, Ohio Midland, Michigan
Climax Molybdenum Co. of Mich. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc.
Refractory Metal Division Pigments Departent - Metal Products
14410 Woodrow Wilson Blvd. Attn: Dr. E.M. MahlaDetroit 38, Michigan Technical Asst. to Director-Metal Prod.
Wilmington 98, DelawareCommanding OfficerWatertown Arsenal Laboratories Crucible Steel Company of AmericaAttn: Mr. S..V. Arnold Attn: Dr, W41ter FinlayAssociate Director Assistant Vice President-TechnologyWatertown 72, Massachusetts P.O. Box 88
Pittsburgh 30. PennsylvaniaMr. James W. ConradTechnical Consultant General Dynamics/Astronautics1526 Denniston Avenue Attn: Mr.V.C. MellquistPittsburgh 17, Pennsylvania Chief of Applied Manufacturing
Research & Process DevelopmentGeneral Dynamics/Convair P.O. Box 1128 (Zone 290-00)Attn: Mr. J. H. Famme, Director San Diego 12, CaliforniaManufacturing Development
I P.O. Box 1950 General Electric CompanySan Diego 12, California Aircraft Gas Turbine Division
Attn: Mr. C. J. Wile
General Electric Company Engineering ManagerAttn: Mr. J.K. Keeler Metallurgical Engineering OperationsManager, Engineering Cincinnati 15, Ohio21800 Tungsten RoadCleveland 17, Ohio H. M Harper Company
Lehigh Avenue & Oaktor. StreetHarvey Aluminum, Inc. Morton Grove, IllinoisU Attn: Mr.C.A. MoudryTe,.hnica" Dix ctor Union Carbide Stellite Company19200 South Western Avenue Kokomo, IndianaTorance, California
Kawecki Chemical CompanyJones & Laughiin Steel Corp. Attn: Mr. Edwin V. Bieleck"Attn: Mr. Robert S. Orr Research Manager
I Commercial Research Librarian Boyertown, Pennsylvania3 Gateway CenterPittsburgh 30, Pennsylvania Ling - Temco-Vought, Inc.
Attn: Library 1-63i0lCanton Drop Forging & Mfg. Co. P.O. Box 5907Atti,: Mr. Chandis Brauchler, Pres. Dallas 22, Texas
S 2100 Wilett AvenueCanton, Ohio
4| I
I1
Stanford Research Institute Wah Chang CorporationDepartment of Metallurgy Attn: Mabel E. Russell, LibrarianMenlo Park, Califo-'nia P.O. Box 366
Albany. OregonSuperior Tube CompanyDevelopment Metallurgy Section Wah Chang CorporationP.O. Box 191 Attn: Mr. K.C. Li, Jr.Norristown, Pennsylvania 100 Church Street
New York 7, New YorkUniversal-Cyclops Steel Corp.Refractomet Division Wolverine TubeAttn: Mr. Charles Mueller Division of Calumet & Hecla, Inc.General Manager Attn: Mr. F.C. Eddens, ManagerBridgeville, Pennsylvania Special Metals, New Products Division
17200 Southfield RoadVanadium Corporation of America Allen Park, MichiganAttn: Mr.C.N. Cosman 1Metallurgical Engineer National Forge CompanyGraybar Building Attn: Mr. James R. Becker420 Lexington Avenue Project EngineerNew York 14, N.Y. Press Form ProductsIrvine, Warren County, Penna.Westinghouse Electric Corporation IC
Materials Manufacturing Dept.Attn: Mr.F.L. OrellSection Manager, Develop. ContractsBlarisville, Pennsylvania
Wyman-Gordon CompanyAttn: Mr. Arnold RustayVice President & Technical Dir.Grafton PlantWorcester StreetNorth Grafton, Massachusetts
Stauffer Metals Company1201 South 47th StreetRichmjr.n, ;alifornia
United States Steel CorporationProducts Development Division525 William Penn PlacePittsburgh, Pennsylvania jU.S. Atomic Energy CommissionTechnical Information Services ExtensionAttn: Mr. Hugh Voress.P.O. Box 62Oak Ridge, Tennessee 1
444
1 0 0 1 0 9:S1-4 9) 0
0 o< > _ 0.4 1- t - bu- a* 4J
(n.w~ E fo
Z~. -
(o .04 s.... E-4v(. V-m~. ". 0iV UU:
LID 0 bo
~FJ 4
-d P4
tic l v U) - 3 (4
0 v V0~ 0I
U) E E U)
U 04 lz w0.1 IN I
S.. to
4:I. 1~4 04
W 0~ > 0 0 v o UoCC) ZA
00U- 0 ~~O t~~ o
Id r
to 4, . ')
- '5 o
It f
1.1<4) 44 4CZ - 0 9- __ __
r. r to u.
.. )0 rI1I4
r XJ
~ 4: J~~O