ultrafast processes in molecules
DESCRIPTION
Ultrafast processes in molecules. XI – Surface hopping with correlated single reference methods. Mario Barbatti [email protected]. Energy. Static EC. Time. D ynamic Electron Correlation. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Ultrafast processes in molecules
Mario [email protected]
XI – Surface hopping with correlated single reference methods
![Page 2: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Energy
Time
SR
ia SR
ja SR
SR
i ja a SR
i ja a SR
MR
MR
Dynamic Electron CorrelationStatic EC
If DEC is needed everywhere and SEC only at the intersection, why choosing CASSCF (only SEC) for
dynamics?
![Page 3: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
We need good SR method for Surface Hopping
SR can describe the relaxation through the manifold of excited states until:• The minimum of the first excited state is found (Kasha’s rule)• The crossing to the ground state is found
We can get information on:• Lifetimes• Reaction pathways distributions
We can’t get information on:• Photoisomerization quantum yield• Ground-state vibrational relaxation
![Page 4: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4• Curchod, Rothlisberger, Tavernelli, ChemPhysChem 14, 1314 (2013)
TDDFT has been the SR choice for a number of groups:
• Bonačić-Koutecký, Mitrić• Tavernelli• Tapavicza, Furche• Ourselves
And about Coupled-Cluster?
![Page 5: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
1 1 2 2 n n
TCC e HF
T t t t
• Sneskov and Christiansen, WIREs 2, 566 (2011)
Coupled-Cluster
![Page 6: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
1 1 2 2 n n
TCC e HF
T t t t
i it
amplitudes
Excitation operator ith-order
• Sneskov and Christiansen, WIREs 2, 566 (2011)
Coupled-Cluster
ijab
2abij
ijab
![Page 7: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
1 1 2 2 n n
TCC e HF
T t t t
• Sneskov and Christiansen, WIREs 2, 566 (2011)
• Choose a truncation level• Insert this Ansatz into TDSE• Get a set of nonlinear equations for the amplitudes and ground-state energy
i
T Ti
T TCC
e t e He HF
E HF e He HF
Coupled-Cluster
![Page 8: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
1 1 2 2 n n
TCC e HF
T t t t
• Sneskov and Christiansen, WIREs 2, 566 (2011)
CCS < CCSD < CCSDT < ···Truncation produces a well defined hierarchy of methods:
CC3, CCSD(T)
Coupled-Cluster
With some exotic flavors
![Page 9: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
i
T Tie t e He HF
For excited states, the important quantity is the CC Jacobian matrix A:
i
i i
i
eA
t
Response Theory shows that:• Excited-state energies W are eigenvalues of A • Contribution R from each determinant is the eigenvector
The problem is to solveWAR R
![Page 10: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
i i
i i i i
i i
e eA A
t t
Jacobian is not a symmetric matrix!
1
W W
AR RLA LLR
=====================================
Left and right eigenvalues converged to the same Results within 0.42E-07 a.u.
![Page 11: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
CCS < CCSD < CC3 < CCSD(T) < CCSDT < ···CC is time-consuming…
CC2CIS(D∞)
![Page 12: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12• Schreiber, Silva-Junior, Sauer, Thiel, J Chem Phys 128, 134110 (2008)
CC is very accurate
![Page 13: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
CC doesn’t work well for degenerated excited states
Non-symmetric Jacobian → eigenvalues (energies) may be imaginary
CCS < CIS(D∞ ) < CC2 < CCSD < CC3 < CCSD(T) < CCSDT < ···
CIS DA
†1ADC 2 CIS D CIS D2
A A A
Build a symmetric Jacobian:
• Hättig, Köhn, J Chem Phys 117, 6939 (2002)
![Page 14: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
CCS < CIS(D∞ ) < CC2 < CCSD < CC3 < CCSD(T) < CCSDT < ···
ADC(2)
ADC(2): Algebraic Diagrammatic Construction scheme up to second order
ADC(2) is not strictly a CC method
It is a excited-state propagator for ground-state MP2 (Schirmer1982)
These excited states are equivalent to the symmetrized CIS(D∞)
Trofimov, Krivdina, Weller, Schirmer, Chem Phys 329, 1 (2006)
![Page 15: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
For surface hopping, we need nonadiabatic couplings Fkl
kl k l
F
R
Analytical nonadiabatic coupling vectors are available only for EOM-CC (CFour)
• Tajti and Szalay, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 124104 (2009)
*2
2max 0, Rel k k l kll
tP c cc
F v
They are used to compute transition probabilities
![Page 16: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16• Hammes-Schiffer and Tully, J Chem Phys 101, 4657 (1994)
In the 1990s, Hammes-Schiffer and Tully showed that
1 2 22kl k l k lt t t t t t t tt
F v
Overlap of electronic wavefunction in different time steps
*2
2max 0, Rel k k l kll
tP c cc
F v
But we follow another way
For the probabilities, we don’t need F, we need F.v
![Page 17: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Couplings based on such overlaps have been used by several authors with:• MRCI• CASSCF• TDDFT• TDDFTB
• Barbatti, WIREs1, 620 (2011)
![Page 18: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Newton-XCIOVERLAP
modulus
MO coefficientsAO integrals for “Double-Molecule”CI coefficients
k lt t t
• Plasser, Granucci, Pittner, Barbatti, Persico, Lischka, J Chem Phys 137, 22A514 (2012)
The couplings can be used not only to get Fkl.vBut also to solve Surface Hopping equations with Local Diabatization method
1 2 22kl k l k lt t t t t t t tt
F v
![Page 19: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
We use the eingenvectors R and L to build CIS wavefunctions
1
1
1
1
1
1
R kk
L kk
R
L
L Rk lk lt t t t t t
1 2 22kl k l k lt t t t t t t tt
F v
*2
2max 0, Rel k k l kll
tP c cc
F v
ki ak ai
a i k
A aiE
For TDDFT (Casida 1996):
![Page 20: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Test case: adenine
![Page 21: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
9H-adenine in the gas phase
Adenine is great for benchmarking:
a) Dynamics is available at:• MRCIS• OM2/MRCI• FOMO-CI/AM1• TDDFT (several functionals)• TDDFTB
b) Different dynamics methods have been used:• Surface Hopping• Ehrenfest Dynamics• Quantum wavepacket
c) Gas-phase transient spectra available for several pump wavelengths
• Barbatti, Lan, Crespo-Otero, Szymczak, Lischka, Thiel, J Chem Phys 137, 22A503 (2012)
N
N N
NH
NH2
2
6
9 S1 min
C2 CI C6 CI
![Page 22: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
RI-ADC(2)/aug-cc-pVDZ
RI-CC2/aug-cc-pVDZ Expt.
E (eV) f E (eV) f E (eV) f
n-p* 5.00 0.026 5.08 0.021p-p* 5.06 0.169 5.13 -0.034
5.16 ± 0.07 a 0.24 bp-p* 5.07 0.101 5.16 0.300p-3s 5.39 0.010 5.39 0.013
Vertical excitation
a Barbatti and Ullrich, PCCP 13, 15492 (2011)b Clark, Peschel, Tinoco, J Phys Chem 69, 3615 (1965)
![Page 23: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
CC2 ADC(2) Expt.Fluorescence (eV) 3.10 2.96 3.86, 3.00 a
Band origin (eV) 4.42 4.29 4.40-4.47 b
Fluorescence in water (f = 2.6×10-4)Band origin: vapor
S1 minimum
N
N N
NH
NH2
2
6
9 S1 min
C2 CI C6 CI
a Daniels and Hauswirth, Science 171, 675 (1971)b Nir, Plutzer, Kleinermanns, de Vries, Eur Phys J D 20, 317 (2002)
![Page 24: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
ADC(2) CC2 Expta
Band Maximum 4.87 4.95 4.92FWHM 0.62 0.57 0.55smax (Å2.molecule-1) 0.50 0.53 0.46
4.0 4.5 5.00.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
CC2
Abso
rptio
n cr
oss s
ectio
n (Å
2 .mole
cule-1
)
Expt.ADC(2)
400 350 300 250 Wavelength (nm)
4.0 4.5 5.00.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
M
Energy (eV)
ADC(2) (V) L
400 350 300 250
a Clark, Peschel, Tinoco, J Phys Chem 69, 3615 (1965)
Absorption
![Page 25: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Initial conditions were sampled in two spectral domains corresponding to different pump excitations
Different proportions of excitations into S1, S2 and S3 contribute to each domain
4.0 4.5 5.00.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
CC2
Abso
rptio
n cr
oss s
ectio
n (Å
2 .mole
cule-1
)
Expt.ADC(2)
400 350 300 250 Wavelength (nm)
4.0 4.5 5.00.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
M
Energy (eV)
ADC(2) (V) L
400 350 300 250
![Page 26: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Simulations setup:
• 50 Trajectories in each domain (L and M)• Fewest Switches with decoherence correction• 0.5 fs time step for classical equations• 0.025 fs for quantum equations• Max 1000 fs or until E1-E0 < 0.1 eV• RI-CC2 and RI-ADC(2)• aug-cc-pVDZ• 3 excited states• Newton-X / Turbomole
1000 ps ADC(2) trajectory takes 24 days in 4 cores Xenon 2.7 GHz
![Page 27: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
CC2 trajectories died in less than 100 fs!
Non-symmetrical Jacobian is the problem
ADC(2) trajectories are perfectly stable
They ran until one of the termination criteria was satisfied
![Page 28: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
D2 diag
nostic for S
1
Low Medium
D1 diag
nostic for S
0
Time (ps) Time (ps)
SR Ground state
MR Ground state
Single excitation
Double excitation
• Nielsen and Janssen, Chem Phys Lett 310, 568 (1999)
![Page 29: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Domain SH/ADC(2) Expt.aL 0.50 ± 0.12 0.62 ± 0.02M 0.57 ± 0.12 0.68 ± 0.02
a Evans and Ullrich, J Phys Chem A, 114, 11225 (2010)
Deactivation to Ground State within 1 ps
0.9(1 ) 0.57(1 0.57)1.645 0.12
50Mp pZN
Margin of error for 90% confidence interval
![Page 30: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Domain SH/ADC(2) Expt.aL 0.50 ± 0.12 0.62 ± 0.02M 0.57 ± 0.12 0.68 ± 0.02
a Evans and Ullrich, J Phys Chem A, 114, 11225 (2010)
Deactivation to Ground State within 1 ps
0.9(1 ) 0.57(1 0.57)1.645 0.12
50Mp pZN
Margin of error for 90% confidence interval
![Page 31: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Domain SH/ADC(2) Expt.aL 0.50 ± 0.12 0.62 ± 0.02M 0.57 ± 0.12 0.68 ± 0.02
a Evans and Ullrich, J Phys Chem A, 114, 11225 (2010)
Deactivation to Ground State within 1 ps
• There is no statistical distinction between L and M• SH/ADC(2) is slightly underestimating the deactivation level Problems with ADC(2) surfaces? Expt. includes 9H and 7H tautomers Expt. includes ionization info (Barbatti and Ullrich 2011)
![Page 32: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
N
N N
NH
NH2
2
6
9 S1 min
C2 CI C6 CI
Trajectories cluster around C2 deformation of the pyrimidine ringC2
![Page 33: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Domain C2 C6 H-elimin.L 0.52 0.36 0.12M 0.54 0.43 0.03
Participation of each reaction path in the internal conversion
• C2 is the dominant one• C6 is also important• H elimination plays a minor role
![Page 34: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
0 2 4 6 83.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0En
ergy
(eV)
Mass-weighted distance (Å.amu1/2)
S1 min
C2 CIC6 CI
There are kinetic reasons favoring C2There are thermodynamic reasons favoring C2
![Page 35: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Experim
ental
ADC(2)MRCIS
OM2/MRCI
TD-PBE
TD-B
97XD
TD-B3LY
P
TD-PBE0
TD-CAM-B3LY
P
TD-BHLY
P
TD-M06-
HF0
20
40
60
80
S 0 p
opula
tion
at 1
ps (
%)
C2 puckering C6 puckering H elimination Experimental682
5712
858
598
58128
2015
0
20212516
1016
• Only ADC(2) and OM2/MRCI predict right IC• MRCIS overshoots IC• TDDFT underestimates IC
• OM2/MRCI underestimates C2
• ADC(2) is the best result so far
![Page 36: Ultrafast processes in molecules](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081507/568165aa550346895dd893c1/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
To conclude:
• SR methods can be very useful for some (not all!) problems in nonadiabatic dynamics• Non-symmetric Jacobians in CC methods are a major problem• ADC(2) showed good potential (accurate and stable)• Lack of hopping to ground state is the main problem