uconn free press oct. 2006, 2
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/21/2019 UConn Free Press Oct. 2006, 2
1/12
Ah, Halloween. It’s that time o year when
jack-o-lanterns flicker in the cool night air,
eerie ghosts hang rom willow trees, and
children blithely nag their parents intoshelling out millions o dollars so they
can dress up as paganistic monsters and
Freudian archetypes in order to perpetuate
a commercial corruption o a Catholic cor-
ruption o the Celtic estival o amhain.
Wait, what?
Alright, let’s go back. Te end o October:
he time o the year when the weather
begins to get cold and plants start to die.
It’d make perect sense or a primitive
people intimately tied up in their climate
and geography to want to commemoratethis turning point in the annual cycle. Te
Celts were a primitive people, they liked
to have estivals with meteorological im-
plications, and they had a big estival in
October to mark the end o summer and
called it Samhain. It all makes sense.
hen along came the Catholics. heCatholics liked to convert primitive peo-
ple, and they liked to do so by moving
Christian holidays to coincide with pa-
gan ones. (Christ had an excellent grasp
o astronomy or his time, to be born on
the Winter Solstice and die on the Ver-
nal Equinox). Introducing All-Saint’s Day
– a time to commemorate all those Saints
too uncool to be celebrated individually.
Originally held on May 13th, the holiday
was moved to November 1st in the 8th
century by Pope Gregory III. Why the
move? o mark the papal dedication o a
newly built church honoring the Saints,obviously. Definitely not to compete with
amhain.
And what better way to show the Catho-
lic saints you care than by dressing up as a
sexy devil or Richard Nixon and going out
to gorge yoursel on refined sugar?
All-right, all-right: So Halloween is abastardized celebration and big uckin’
deal. We’re used to it. Look at Valentine’s
Day, look at Christmas. Tis is America
and holidays boost the economy, pino.
Te National Conectioners’ Association
recognizes Halloween as the number-one
holiday or candy sales, with over 85% o
American households handing out sweets
and cumulative sales in excess o $2 billion.
What’re a handul o dead saints next to a
ew hundred million dead presidents?
In act, what’s the United States govern-
ment next to a ew hundred million dead
presidents? Really, once you’ve reachedthe loty economic stratosphere inhab-
ited by today’s commercial sugar produc-
ers and soda-pop manuacturers, nothing
inside issueinside issue
16
the issue is not the issue Issue 16. October 23, 2006
Halloween UndercoverTe White Granular Stuff
by Bryan Murphy
IntelligentDesign andyou.pg. 09
N. Koreaand theatmoicoopspg. 05
SongReview:Sufjanpg. 0716
Katy Refus-es to weara costume.pg. 11
-
8/21/2019 UConn Free Press Oct. 2006, 2
2/12
2
Get Tee Behind Me, Satan, and into the Halloween Store
Down on my luck, back to the wall.All the odds are against me. I knew,
one more lousy effort and I was surely
going to get canned. So I perked up,
summoned all o my strength and,
with the will o God behind me, I set
out on the most important quest o
my lie, a quest… to the Halloween
store, in Manchester, off exit 62 some-
where.
Preparations had begun some
weeks back, and it was, like, uesday
or Wednesday when we actually de-
cided to go. We were going to go that
previous Tursday, but, you know howit is, and so we decided to go on what-
ever day it was that we actually went.
Te Yankee game was on, I remember,
game two, the one that bum Mussina
ended up blowing. Anyway, things
happen and it was too nice o a day to
let the shitty Yankees interere with my
Halloween store obligations. Plus that
piece o shit Rogers was pitching game
three or Detroit, so I wasn’t worried.
In retrospect I should’ve been,
but not because the Yankees ended
up blowing it in our games, oh no,
oooooooooohhhh no. No, I should
have been worried because we were
about to conront perhaps the largest
black market supplier o psilocybin
mushrooms and human traicking
this side o the Mississippi. And beore
it was all over, we would come ace to
ace with death itsel.
First o all, it took the photographer
and I about 50 minutes to ind the
ucking place off the highway. Have
you ever been down to the Manches-
ter mall? It’s ucking ridiculous! I’ve
been to that movie theater literally five
times and I still don’t have the oggiest
idea where it is. Put up a ucking sign,
you piece o shit town! We drove by
the Dick’s sporting goods twice. How
in the hell is that possible, we were
stone sober. But Jesus was with us, in
the orm o that really riendly Jesus
rom Dogma, you know, the one giv-
ing the thumbs up, so this calmed us
down a bunch. Plus, as I remarked to
the photographer at the time, “don’t
worry, i we can’t find it we’ll just go
into the Dick’s or something and make
the story about that,” or something
along those lines. In act, I was start-
ing to get a little anxious about actu-ally even making it to the Halloween
store. I figured, at that point we would
either uncover a huge drug running
operation, at which point I would have
to go into witness protection in some
by James Randall
shithole suburb outside o Kansas Citywhere hal the population rides rascal
scooters to get to the barbeque joints
because they’re too large to move un-
der their own power, or nothing at
all would happen and it would end
up being really a boring story and a
real chore to write. Plus I heard tale
that there was a pirate. So when the
photographer yelled out “there’s the
Petco,” the Petco being next to the Hal-
loween store, I couldn’t help but eel
a bit, well, ambivalent. Ambivalence
being, o course, I bit lower than, say,
sheer excitement, or jubilation, as onemight normally expect rom such an
interesting, dare I say captivating as-
signment.
Right rom the get go I knew this
place was trouble. We were greeted at
the door by some floor monster, who
lunged at us and blinked red lights out
o his eyes or a ew seconds, and then
when the door closed he stopped. I
waved into his eyes or a solid 15
seconds, but he was done. Probably
$49.99 plus tax.
Tey had a bunch o shit there, man,and i any o it was made on this hemi-
sphere I’d eat my hat, which is now,
by the way, a purple edora pimp hat
($14.99). It’s really pretty nice. Tey
had some solid canes there, too, but
what with the skulls and all I figured
most ladies o the night would be, per-
haps, turned off a bit i I strolled up
with them at my side. I don’t know.
Weird place. Only about a third
o the huge, cavernous, warehousian
buiding was used or the fly-by-night
Halloween setup. he rest was like
something out o one o those terribleSaw movies. I hate that guy. I can’t wait
or them to kill him off, he’s such a son
o a bitch. And he was there, too! Sell-
ing mushrooms, as it turned out.
Oh, and we, uh, saw a bunch o grim
reaper costumes, too.
Oh, and a og machine, and we
couldn’t figure out how in the world
it worked. It was like magic. I put a
chestnut in it!
On the way out, I told the photogra-
pher to slow down when we passed thepirate. I wanted to interview him.
As we approached, he waved his
sword mightily into the air, slashing
it down with a heroes might at the big
yellow sign he was holding. He had a
big hat, and a patch, real piratey.
“Excuse me,” I said to him, “we’re
doing a story or the UConn Free
Press, do you have a quote?”
He looked back bashully, shoulder’s
shrugged and smiling, “No.”
“Oh.” No ucking way, I need this
ucking pirate or this story, dammit.
Tink, James, think. “Uh, do you havea name or your pirate?”
He laughed a little. “No, uh, nope.”
Success! Suc-ucking-cess! hat’s
or damn sure a quote. I can definitely
use that.
So, in the end, the photographer
and I rode off into the sunset, on the
majestic hillside o the Manchester
mall area, back to 84. All was right
with the world.
O W E D .
-
8/21/2019 UConn Free Press Oct. 2006, 2
3/12
on Heaven or Earth is going to stop
you rom getting what you want. Te
orld ealth rganization? Pshhhh.
When an independent team o 30 o
the world’s top nutritionists gets to-
gether and releases a study advocating
that added sugar should account orno more than 10% o a healthy diet,
the orld ugar rganization has 40
ambassadors write to the W.H.O de-
manding the report be removed on the
basis that it is doing irreparable harm
to the developing world. Who would
win in a fight between 30 nutritionists
and 40 ambassadors?
Tat was not a rhetorical question.
Ten you have the U.S. Council or In-
ternational Business, comprising more
than 300 companies (predominantly
among which are Coca-Cola and
Pepsico.), threatening to strong-armCongress into cutting off the United
States’ $406 million annual cash flow
to the W.H.O. Ten the W.H.O. pulls
their study. Health: 0. Sugar: 1.
But to be air, the World Sugar
Organization has some data on their
side; their trump card is insisting an
Institute o Medicine report claims a
healthy diet can consist o 25% add-
ed sugars. And again, to be air, the
president o the Institute has gone on
record stating that the W.S.O. is mis-
interpreting their data. So remember,
223,675,000 metric tons o raw sugar
produced annually. Tat’s somewhere
around 493 billion pounds at about
10.5 cents per pound, and that’s what’s
really important.
Te most remarkable thing about
this entire debate is that there’s such a
controversy over restricting what was
once an incredibly rare and expensive
spice to only 10% of our total diet .
(Have you ever thought o sugar as a
spice?) Sugar used to be well-nigh im-
possible to come by and the exclusive
domain o the rich and luxurious. Q:
What the hell happened? A: Disease
and slavery.
ake one set o Caribbean islands.
Add in smallpox, cholera, typhoid e-
ver, tuberculosis, a disease-susceptible
native population, and the realization
that the Caribbean has the perect cli-
mate or sugarcane production. Mix
rapidly, and as the native population
quickly dies o replace with a ew
million Arican slaves (to work the
burgeoning sugarcane plantations).
By the 18th century, the Europeans
were firmly addicted to sweet tea and
biscuits with jam, and sugar was here
to stay.When you think “Jamaican”, do you
think Bob Marley? But remember that
there weren’t any blacks in the Carib-
bean only 400 years ago. Bob Marley
is an anachronistic relic of an impe-
rial history - with a sweet tooth. Te
next time you think “Jamaican,” think
cholera-ridden Arawak and aino In-
dians.
But the past is the past, man, and
onto the bright future! In our mod-
ern era, workers on a sugar plantation
in the Dominican Republic need not
ear the slave master’s whip – not when
they can look orward to 12 hour work
days at just under 17 cents an hour!
rogress!
So here we’ve got all this sugar be-
ing produced under brutally inhu-mane conditions, and we’re lovin’ it.
‘Cuz that sugar has to go somewhere,
and the leading suspect is Americans’
wide, slavering maws. U.S. Depart-
ment o Agriculture numbers indi-
cate we all gulp down over 64 pounds
o the white, granular stuff per year.
And why not? We can get more sugar
in more ways now than ever beore.
Gone are the bad old days of bland
boring white sugar. Why not some
Demerara sugar? Why not some ur-
binado sugar? Why not some high
ructose corn syrup? I mean, corn isa vegetable, right? Te stuff is practi-
cally good or you! Show your riends
that you can uel your addiction more
ashionably and expensively than they
can!
Because sugar is addictive, aer all.
Not an “I really like sugar” addictive,
but more o a, “I’m going through
physiological withdrawal because I’m
not getting enough sugar” addictive.
remors, depression, headaches – all
sorts o lovely withdrawal symptoms. I
mean, did you think Americans derive
more o their calories rom soda than
any other single ood product simply
because soda tastes good? Most soda
is nothing more than high-ructose
corn syrup and caffeine (another ad-
dictive substance), with a little flavor-
ing thrown in to give us a pretext or
wanting it.
One shouldn’t be too hard on refined
sugar, though. A lot o perectly natu-
ral substances can become addictive
when they’re highly processed. Sugar-
cane goes through a lot of shit to end
up in those white packets at South. In
order to produce refined white sugar,
sugarcane is first crushed to bits to ex-
tract its juices. Te resultant juices are
filtered, treated with lime to remove
impurities, and then neutralized with
sulur dioxide. Te juice is boiled, with
sedimentary impurities sinking to the
bottom and scum rising to the surace
to be skimmed off. Next, the syrupy
liquid is cooled while being stirred,
crystallizing into those brown sugar
granules we all know and love, while
uncrystallized syrup is removed by a
centriuge. Tis raw, brown sugar is
precipitated by a mixture o calcium
hydroxide beore being passed througha bed o activated charcoal to achieve
that desirable, pearly white color.
Hell, what wouldn’t be addictive
aer being put through such a grind?
ake a harmless little flower. Crush
it up filter the juices. reat the juices
with lime to remove impurities be-
ore neutralizing them with ammo-
nia, and then filter them again. Cook
the resultant liquid or six hours with
an equivalent weight o acetic anhy-
dride, then treat it with a mixture o
water and hydrochloric acid to puriy
the product. Add sodium carbonate
to induce precipitation o particulate
matter in the liquid, and finally, pass
the end product through a mixture o
alcohol and activated charcoal. Tat
procedure remind you o anything?Juices? Lime? Activated charcoal?
Processing sugarcane yields refined
white sugar. Processing poppy flow-
ers yields heroin.
O course, the difference between
these two highly addictive, psychoac-
tive drugs is that only one o them is
directly marketed to children by super-
subtle advertising executives through
bright and cheery cartoon. Start with
Pixie Stics, then work your way up
to a line or two, kids.
In act, maybe Little Johnny bet-
ter just start with the line. You know,heroin causes no ongoing toxicity to
the tissues or organs o the body – that
is, i you don’t drop dead rom an O.D.
outright. Sugar, on the other hand…
we all know sugar can promote obe-
sity, especially because it causes a
rapid rise in insulin levels which tells
the body to store consumed calories
directly as at. But how many o the
ultra-tanned O.C. Princesses order-
ing their sweetened iced teas at Star-
bucks are aware that sugar can also
promote the growth o kidney stones
and gallstones, while leading to os-
teoporosis, heart disease, personality
changes and mood swings? Oh, and
did you know glucose and Vitamin
C have extremely similar chemical
structures? In act, your body can re-
ally only metabolize one at a time – a
blood sugar level o 120, considered
perectly average or a healthy person,
can nonetheless reduce the number o
bacteria your body’s phagocytes caneliminate by 75%.
And don’t even mention diabetes.
So bac to Halloween. We’ve got
clean, modern, liberated Christian
parents rushing their kids off to Wal-
Mart and arget to snap up poorly-
made pint-size costumes o satanic
monsters and sexually repressed Cin-
derallas in order that their children
might enjoy a night o pagan celebra-
tion while snapping up pure refined
sugar produced through the efforts o
Dominican slave laborers. Perhaps the
sugar’s cut with a bit o ood coloringand cocoa butter, maybe packaged
in a shiny plastic wrapper. Perhaps it
isn’t. At any rate, it’s a sight to make
a comic-book supervillain weep tears
o envy.
So i you want to know what I’ll be
doing this Halloween, I’m dressing up
as the Joker. It only seemed appropri-
ate. (Currently accepting applications
rom hot babes to be my Harley Quinn.
Lithe figures, anti-social personalities,
psychiatric training all a plus.)
Bryan Murphy is a first semester reshman. I
this article has induced you to love or hate him
– or you’re an attractive, criminally insane psy-
chiatrist – drop him a line at cormano.wild@
gmail.com
Halloween Undercovercontinued from page 1
3
Orange leaves and autumn spices are
on the changing winds. Soon, we will
have one last hurrah at Halloween, be-
ore winter creeps in. Long ago, the
ancient Celts also celebrated this time
o year. Te Celtic calendar’s equiva-
lent to November was Samhain (pron.
SOW-wen), popularly translated as
“summer’s end.” A holiday by the
same name marked the month’s an-
nual beginning around Oct. 31 or Nov.
1, when Celts would hold a estival or
the dead and or the final harvest.
Present-day Pagans have embracedthis holiday as one o eight in their
Wheel o the Year. Usually, Samhain
is observed around Oct. 31 or Nov. 1.
It is a time when the veil separating
the world o the living and world o
the dead is so thin that the spirits o
the dead may easily cross between the
two worlds, in order to socialize with
the living. Samhain is also a time to
honor ancestors and other departed
souls, and to ask or their blessings.
Moreover, the seasonal shi reminds
us that here, Earth is moving toward
darkness and winter, themselves
symbolic o death. As part o a cycle,
though, there is always the promise o
a orthcoming rebirth. But or now,
we greet the coming winter and shi-
ing sunlight, the beginning o a new
cycle. Because o this, you might soon
hear “Happy New Year!”
Want to learn more, or just chill
with Pagans and people rom other
aiths? Visit PODS, the Pagan Or-
ganization or Diverse Spirituality!
PODS meets hursdays at 6:30 PM
in Student Union Room 410.
Darkness, Our Dearly Departed, and the New Year
Here’s to Samhain!by Olivia Von Kohorn
-
8/21/2019 UConn Free Press Oct. 2006, 2
4/12
Jailing Pregnant Women Raises Health Risks
4
In recent months, pregnant women
have been arrested and jailed in South
Carolina, New Mexico, Arizona, Ala-bama, Colorado, Georgia, Missouri,
North Dakota and New Hampshire,
among other states, based on the claim
that pregnant women can be consid-
ered child abusers even beore they
have given birth.
Women targeted or these arrests
are usually those with untreated drug
or alcohol problems.
Other women have also been ar-
rested or endangering the etus by
not getting to the hospital quickly
enough on the day o delivery and by
not ollowing doctor’s advice to getbed rest. One woman who suered
a stillbirth was arrested or murder
based on the claim that by exercising
her right to medical decision-making
and postponing a Caesarean section,
she caused the death o her child.
Law enorcement officials oen jus-
tiy the application o criminal laws
to pregnant women by claiming that
the arrest and imprisonment o preg-
nant women will protect etuses and
advance children’s health.
“We have to look at each act to de-
termine what the right thing is to doto protect the children,” Jerry Peace,
a South Carolina prosecutor, said re-
cently.
But every leading medical organiza-
tion to address this issue--including
the American Medical Association,
the American College o Obstetri-
cians and Gynecologists, the Ameri-
can College o Nurse Midwives, the
American Academy o Pediatrics and
the March o Dimes--has concluded
that the problem o alcohol and drug
use during pregnancy is a health issue
best addressed through education andcommunity-based amily treatment,
not through the criminal justice sys-
tem.
As leading public health and child
welare groups have long noted, preg-
nant women do not experience alco-
holism and other drug dependencies
because they want to harm their e-
tuses or because they don’t care about
their children.
Treats Don’t Wor
Medical knowledge about addiction
and dependency treatment demon-strates that patients do not, and cannot,
simply stop their drug use as a result
o threats o arrest or other negative
consequences. Tis is one reason why
threat-based approaches do not work
to stop drug use or to protect chil-
dren. Such approaches have, in act,
been shown to deter pregnant women
not rom using drugs but rather rom
seeking prenatal care and what little
drug and alcohol treatment may be
available to them.
Health risks to women, etuses and
children--whether arising rom pov-
erty, inadequate nutrition, exposure toalcohol, drugs or other actors--can be
mitigated through prenatal and con-
tinuing medical care and counseling.
For this to be eective, however,
the woman must trust her health care
providers to saeguard her confidences
and to stand by her while she attempts
to improve her health, even i those e-
orts are not always successul. rans-
orming health care encounters into
grounds or prosecution and turning
health care proessionals into agents
o law enorcement destroys this all-
important trust.Not only does the threat o arrest
deter women rom seeking care that
could urther both maternal and etal
health, but the imprisonment o preg-
nant women itsel also poses signifi-
cant dangers.
A 2005 Maryland case belies any
claim that arresting pregnant women
protects etuses, children or amilies.
Kari Parsons was imprisoned spe-
cifically to protect the health o her
etus.
She was arrested when she was sev-
en months pregnant because a drugtest mandated as part o her proba-
tion or shopliing returned a positive
result. Tough standard practice is to
release people arrested or probation
violations on their own recognizance
until their later court dates, the judge
in Parsons’ case sent her to jail, citing
his interest in protecting the etus’s
health.
Born in a Jail Cell
Yet three weeks later, because o the
judge’s ostensible concern or the e-
tus, Parsons’ son was born in condi-tions that put both his and his mother’s
health and lie at risk.
Parsons gave birth to her son alone
in a dirty Maryland jail cell urnished
only with a toilet and a bed with no
sheets. She had been in labor or sev-
eral hours and had countless times
pleaded or help and medical atten-
tion. Te requests were denied.
Te Jennier Road Detention Cen-
ter, where she was incarcerated, re-
peatedly ignored her cries that she
was well into labor and needed to goto the hospital. Other inmates, hearing
Parsons’ cries, implored guards to take
her to the hospital.
Instead, guards took her out o a
holding area with other inmates--
who had helped to time her contrac-
tions--and put her in a cell by hersel.
A ew hours later, Parsons gave birth
completely alone, without health care
or support o any kind. According to
press reports, although completely
healthy when he was b orn, Parsons’
son soon developed an inection due
to the unsanitary conditions o hisbirth.
Only last week, a woman gave birth
in a Harris County, exas, jail cell. An-
other inmate who witnessed the birth
told local television news reporters that
despite the pregnant woman’s pleas or
medical attention, guards reused to
help her. She gave birth in a jail cell
without medical assistance.
Te argument that arresting preg-
nant women protects etal or maternal
health is squarely contradicted by an-
other typical prison condition.
Prisons throughout the UnitedStates restrain and shackle women
throughout pregnancy and during
labor, even though international hu-
man rights law bans restraints under
these circumstances.
reaties Ban Shacling
When Kari Parsons began to have
labor pains a ew days beore giving
birth, she was taken to a medical a-
cility and later returned to the deten-
tion center. She was transported in
handcus and shackles. Although
international law and treaties signedby the United States prohibit the
shackling o pregnant and birthing
women, Amnesty International USA
reports that only two states--Illinois
and Caliornia--have banned the bar-
baric practice throughout pregnancy
and childbirth.
Besides being dehumanizing and
totally unnecessary or public saety,
the use o shackles and handcuffs dur-
ing pregnancy and childbirth is dan-
gerous to maternal and etal health.Pregnant women in their third
trimesters may already have balance
problems; shackling their legs height-
ens the risk that a woman will all,
potentially injuring them and their
etuses. Also troubling is that the use
o restraints during labor can, accord-
ing to Amnesty International USA,
“compromise the ability to manipu-
late (the pregnant woman’s) legs into
the proper position or the necessary
treatment.”
Furthermore, when doctors need to
remove the restraints to provide ad-equate care--such as perorming an
emergency Caesarean--it can take five
or 10 minutes to locate the keys, un-
lock the shackles and ree the woman’s
legs. Tis delay can be the difference
between lie and death or a woman
or her child.
In 2005 Regina Kilmon and Kelly
Lynn Cruz in albot County, Md.,
were arrested and charged with child
abuse and reckless endangerment
when they gave birth in spite o a
drug problem. Te local social services
director, Cathy Mols, said that suchprosecutions were “helpul in protect-
ing children and amilies.”
Recently, Maryland’s highest court
unanimously overturned the convic-
tions, concluding that the state leg-
islature never intended its child en-
dangerment law to be used as a basis
or policing pregnancy. Such a ruling,
however, should not have been nec-
essary to persuade prosecutors and
other state officials that arresting and
imprisoning women is no way to pro-
tect pregnant women and their chil-
dren.
Tis article first appeared in Women’s eNews,
and is reprinted here with the permission.
http://www.womensenews.org/
by Ehrlich and Paltrow
-
8/21/2019 UConn Free Press Oct. 2006, 2
5/12
5
About Women’s eNewsby Women’s eNews
Women’s eNews is the deinitive
source o substantive news--unavail-
able anywhere else--covering issues
o particular concern to women and
providing women’s persp ectives on
public policy. It enhances women’s
ability to define their own lives and
to participate ully in every sector o
human endeavor.
Women’s eNews became indepen-
dent on January 1, 2002. Women’s
eNews grew out o a 1996 roundtable
discussion conceived and unded
by the Barbara Lee Family Founda-
tion and hosted by the NOW Legal
Deense and Education Fund. Aer
additional research on the need or a
media outlet to distribute news o con-
cern to women and the opportunity to
provide women’s voices to commercial
media, NOW Legal Deense under-
took in 1999 to create Women’s eNews
as an Internet-based news service or
all women, with a special emphasis
on being a resource or commercial
media. wo years later, NOW Legal
Deense determined Women’s eNews
could sustain its success and stand on
its own.
Women’s eNews editors seek out
reelance writers rom around the
world to write on every topic--politics,
religion, economics, health, science,
education, sports, legislation--and
commission them to write 800-word
news articles or distribution each
day to our subscribers and or post-
ing on our Web site. We rely on the
ham News, the Pittsburgh Post-Ga-
zette, the Spokane Spokesman-Leader,
NPR and MSNBC to newspapers in
Kuala Lampur and the Philippines.
[Go to What Editors Are Saying about
Women’s eNews page]
Women’s eNews launched in April
2003 its Arabic language version o
Women’s eNews. Te site has drawn
rave reviews and attracted the atten-
tion o the New York imes business
section.
Check out Women’s eNews at http://
www.womensenews.org/
best practices o journalism and have
gained enormous credibility by do-
ing excellent journalism each day.
Our commentaries--distributed each
Wednesday--are written by prominent
advocates. We also offer a monthly col-
umn in the media, Uncovering Gen-
der, and update our page each week
with an editorial cartoon by Pulitzer-
prize winner Ann elnaes.
Women’s eNews has been widely
tapped by other media rom coast to
coast and around the globe, rom such
leading media outlets as Te New York
imes, PBS, Te Washington Post, the
Los Angeles imes, the Chicago ri-
bune, the New York Daily News, the
San Francisco Chronicle, the Buffalo
News, San Jose Mercury, the Birming-
Nuclear Boogie-ManEmpty Costume
Recently North Korea announced that
it has detonated its first nuclear weap-
on. Tis is the announcement rom the
North Korean News Agency website.
“Pyongyang, October 9 (KCNA) -
- Te Korean Central News Agency
released the ollowing report: Te field
o scientific research in the DPRK suc-cessully conducted an underground
nuclear test under secure conditions
on October 9, Juche 95 (2006) at a
stirring time when all the people o
the country are making a great leap
orward in the building o a great pros-
perous powerul socialist nation.
It has been confirmed that there was
no such danger as radioactive emission
in the course o the nuclear test as it
was carried out under a scientific con-
sideration and careul calculation.
Te nuclear test was conducted with
indigenous wisdom and technology100 percent. It marks a historic event
as it greatly encouraged and pleased
the KPA and people that have wished
to have powerul sel-reliant deense
capability.
It will contribute to deending the
peace and stability on the Korean Pen-
insula and in the area around it.”
While the Uconn Worker’s Deense
Collective would like to commend
worker’s states, even degenerated
worker’s states, or their work to build
deenses against western capitalist im-
perialism we deplore the North Kore-ans or their ineffective weapons con-
struction. While there is little doubt
that amidst great adversity the DPRK
indeed detonated a nuclear device it
was hardly a success.
As many o you know, nuclear
weapons require extensive technol-
ogy to develop. However, you may
underestimate the scientific research
necessary to actually put the raw ma-
terials together into a device that not
only will create an awesome explosion
but also be useul in deterring western
imperialist aggression. You may have
seen that 80s movie “Te Manhattan
Project”. In this cult classic, John Lith-
gow develops “99.9% pure plutonium”
which zany iconoclastic boy-genius
Christopher Collet then steals with
a remote controlled car and uses to
build a super bomb. Well, North Ko-
rea ain’t got John Lithgow even i theymight have super-genius types at their
disposal.
North Korea’s bomb was by most
expert opinion very much a issile
fizzle. It is very likely that the DPRK
had plutonium which was close to
“99.9% pure” but sadly or North Ko-
rea it should have done more research
than watching “Te Manhattan Proj-
ect”. We know it did – Kim Jung-il’s
love or decadent bourgeoisie cinema
is another reason that we denounce
North Korea as a degenerated worker’s
state. What it needs to build its inde-pendent nuclear deterrent is not only
pure plutonium but a very speciic
type o plutonium – o atomic weight
239 and not the heavier PU- 241 and
PU 242 which will stifle the explosion.
It is likely Kim Jung-il was expecting
5-15 kilotons o yield, however due to
the incompetence and corruption that
is endemic in totalitarian degenerated
workers’ states, he got one-hal kilo-
ton. Oops. Tis is like buying a 30 rack
and finding a can o O’doul’s inside.
o quote the arms control
wonk[1],“o close this discourse about op-
erational conidence by noting that
the United States has built a missile
deense that does not work, to deend
against a North Korean missile that
does not work, that would carry a
nuclear warhead that does not work.
Tis is all very postmodern”
I only capitalism understood irony.
[1] http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/1233/
so-like-why-didnt-it-work
by UConn Worker’s Deence Collective
-
8/21/2019 UConn Free Press Oct. 2006, 2
6/12
6
wants YOUwants YOU5000 copies o your work
distributed to the public, ree.
weekly meeting Tues. 6pm - Student Union Room 324
WritersWriters ArtistsArtists
.
-
8/21/2019 UConn Free Press Oct. 2006, 2
7/12
Song Review:Sufan’sby Chad “Bourner” Denton
Tere was a period o two-or-so years,ollowing the 2003 Greetings romMichigan album release, when SufanStevens was the single most prolificmusician in the independent realmand simultaneously one o the mostrevered. Having therein begun anopenly-declared mission to producean album or each o the fiy states,Sufan moved on to Illinois (Come On!Feel the Illinoise,) and all the while
nursed a number o unrelated albumsinto fine orm. Most remarkably, themass o b-sides he accumulated alongthe way included some o his most pro-ound work, which he elt warrantedreleasing the entire collection in albumorm. Tis, however, is where Sufan’sluck with the public eye took a turn orthe worse. Upon airing Te Avalanche(outtakes rom Michigan) Sufan cameunder critical fire, and in the ace odisapproval he seemed unconvincedo his own readiness to capture theessence o each state. While Te Ava-lanche earned song-by-song praise inthe online blog networks, publishedmusic writers generally considered itsrelease an indiscriminate use o excessmaterial on the artist’s part. While TeAvalanche was valuable as, i nothingelse, a respectably sincere and riskydisclosure o the artistic process, itsdamaged reputation raised doubt as toSufan’s ability to build on early successin the ace o criticism. For some timeSufan made no gesture to signal hewas moving orward, until he unveiledan as-o-yet unpublished masterpiecein live orm on September 29 – “Maj-
esty Snowbird.”Reportedly the song is the end-
result o a concept Sujan has beenchurning in his head or several years,and the sheer volume o considerationhe has given to it is reflected in its ull-ness throughout an epic span (aboutten minutes.) Tough the basic themerepeats, there is no weak point in theperormance and the oundationalmelody grows ever-more intenselybeautiul as it resuraces. Sufan haslong perormed with a small orches-tra at his side, and “Majesty Snowbird”allows every acet o the company toshine as rarely beore, with the hornand percussion sections highlightedparticularly brightly. “riumph” is thefirst word that comes to mind as thesong picks up, and I find mysel pictur-
ing Sufan as a tuxedo-clad conductorperorming in glory or the first timesince a stint o creative stagnation.he classical-composer image allsaway in the final two minutes, how-ever, when he steps orward with anelectric guitar; in trademark Stevensashion he spikes his steadily-pacedmarch through identifiable musicaltraditions with a fierce cry or indi- viduality, this time by driving a line odistortion into the heart o the melody.Te ultimate effect is timelessness, asSujan pushes classical themes andnostalgic olk-Americana to indie’scutting edge.
Much o the circumstance sur-rounding “Majesty Snowbird” is amystery, and it is sae to say that noone who witnessed the perormance
saw it coming. Sufan’s next scheduledstudio release is a Christmas EP, whichseems an unlikely fit or the song. Tepossibility o its appearance on thenext installation o the Fity StatesProject has led ans to speculate overwhat U.S. territory might be home to
this elusive snowbird and all its maj-esty, but the man in charge has kepthis peace on the matter. What is clear,however, is that Sufan Stevens is back- i he was ever gone - and he wants usto know it. You should find this songonline at the Hype Machine (hype.non-standard.net,) and i you are bysome chance new to Sufan’s work besure to look up “Chicago” and “For theWidows in Paradise, For the Fatherlessin Ypsilanti” as well – the triple crown,i you will. Enjoy the odyssey.
moving like mind motor light,
this 3 am eeling is eeling right!
im in deeep wrist thinker fink in articulate
endocrine modulators o shower curtain stall
moving like he was moving books down the halli cant move
the stink bug on the bug screen hunting with pride
as time just slides on by
its no longer july
mists and skinny trunks reaching reaching
im slender will somebody pull me off?
the ender’s tender buffed and scoffed
retouched with the cloth, o her
weeping as a well o rose petals,
and my mother’s old drawing stares out rom
rames o black and red, people on fishooks
and the fish rowning...
ridicululous
like nothing
eeling bliss
ollowing light with physical maniests
spaceships to sun, and gardens to glass to mars
o destiny, souls cryingor we orbit ourselves with dying o the light,
the borne creation made
or love, here and now
flexing back into a ramework
o names places and things
and a billions strings stretching rom
butterflies to sun evolving into the perect rom the perect
(aint it eeling just so)anonymous
-
8/21/2019 UConn Free Press Oct. 2006, 2
8/12
Murky Water
Te continuing popularity o bottled
water has created a $100 billion dol-
lar a year industry, but very ew in-
dividuals know exactly what they are
drinking. Is it really just pure, crisp,
natural, water?
Tere seems to be a small revolu-
tion taking place where soda and
other high ructose beverages are
being replaced by a healthier alterna-
tive: bott led water. It’s cheap, easy, and
everyone’s doing it.
It is clear that brands such Coca-
Cola and Fiji “Natural Artesian Wa-
ter” use packaging tactics to make
bottled water more appealing. Tere
are blue tinted plastics, enticing pic-
tures o tropical settings, and o course
the picturesque enchanted orest and
mountain streams.
Te water in all o these bottles are
not the same, nor are they as clean,
pure, and healthy as you are led to
believe.
In 1992, as Poland Spring was be-
coming a household name, there were
suspicions o whether or not their wa-
ter was really spring water. o settle
the critics, the company sent six ge-
ologists into the pond that was ed by
Poland Spring and confirmed that the
source was spring ed.
It wasn’t until 1995 however, thatthe Food and Drug Administration
agreed that water rom boreholes
(holes drilled that tap into the ground-
water as it’s flowing toward the spring’s
opening) were acceptable sources and
could be called “spring water.”
In 2002, to investigate a class-action
suit against Poland Spring and their
claim as “natural spring water,” our
geologists were hired to bore holes
into the pond o Poland Spring, still
not convinced that the 1992 study the
company did was credible. All our o
the geologists stated that the boreholeswere not providing “natural spring
water,” according to FDA definitions.
Additionally, another source used by
Poland Spring five miles away—Gar-
den Spring—was determined to be
manmade.
Again in 2003, the Connecticut
Superior Court filed a lawsuit against
Nestle, the owners o Poland Spring.
Te plaintiffs contended that Nestle
was using alse advertising, stating
that the original Poland Spring hadn’t
flowed since 1967. Tey claimed that
the water was coming rom sources
up to 30 miles away, including an area
surrounded by asphalt parking lots.
Additionally, the two plaintiffs were
concerned about Poland Spring us-
ing groundwater and a source near a
ormer garbage dump. Poland Spring
settled by handing out discount cou-
pons.
Similar cases were filed in New Jer-
sey and Massachusetts.
A our-year study by the Natu-
ral Resources Deense Council that
looked at 103 different brands, ound
that one-third o the water did not
meet state or industry saety stan-
dards. Some o the samples contained
traces o contaminants like arsenic
and carcinogenic compounds. he
World Health Organization says that
“some micro-organisms, which are
normally o little or no public healthsignificance, may grow to higher levels
in bottled waters,” as they are gener-
ally stored or longer periods and are
at higher temperatures compared to
water distributed in pipe systems.
In hopes o making huge proits
o Mother Nature, many bottling
companies look to over sea sources,
where many countries do not have the
resources or the expertise or sae wa-
ter standards and guidelines. Many o
these countries may be prone to water
contaminated with hazards such lead,
arsenic, benzene, bacteria, viruses,parasites, Vibrio cholera, hepatitis A,
and even trace amounts o glass chips
or metal ragments.
In 2004, nearly 200 bottling plants
were shut down in India, due to plants
not submitting water test reports.
Many o these plants were operated
by the Coca-Cola Company, which
bottles under the label Dasani. Ad-
ditionally, as many as fiy nearby vil-
lages complained o water shortages.
While there are international guide-
lines, which are recommendations and
not mandatory, set orth by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission or natu-
ral mineral water, there are currently
no universally accepted standards or
bottled and packaged waters other
than mineral water, which comes
rom a strict source and has no urther
treatment. Te WHO, which recog-
nizes Codex, is seen “as representing
the international consensus or con-
sumer protection.”
Furthermore, according the NRDC,
many o the FDA’s rules regarding bot-
tled water in the United States exempts
nearly 60 to 70% o the bottled water
sold. he guidelines, which can be
ound in section 165.110 in the Code
o Federal Regulations, leave many
loopholes or bottling companies to
pass on potentially unsae water to
consumers.
Te marketing strategies that bot-tling companies use to sell their prod-
uct as a healthy alternative to tap water
is clearly a myth. For example, many
city water plants must test or E. coli
bacteria 100 times or more a month,
while bottling plants can get by with
only once a week. City tap water must
also meet strict standards or certain
toxic and cancer-causing chemicals
such as phthalates (a compound used
in the plastic bottling that has been
shown to cause damage to the liver,
kidneys, lungs, and testes); bottled wa-
ter is exempt rom these regulations.City water supplies must also be tested
by government certified labs, some-
by David Huck
8
thing bottlers are not required to do.
Cities also required to release annual
reports to citizens telling consumers
what is in their water, while bottlers
do no such service.
We are part o a global community
in which 14,000 people a day die due
to water-related diseases, the leading
cause o death in the world. As Ameri-
cans who have become subjected to
a trendy bottled water culture, we
should become more conscious o the
products we buy and who they have
affected.
SOURCES
Parloff, Roger. “SPRINGIME FOR POLAND.”
Fortune 149.3 (2004): 42-44. Academic Search
Premier. 9 October 2006. http://search.ebsco-host.com.
21 Code o Federal Regulations. Section165.110(a)(3)(ii) 8 Oct. 2006
Aslam, Abid. “Bottled Water: Nectar o the
Frauds?” Project Censored. 3 Oct. 2006.
< http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2007/index.htm#20>
“Bottled Water: Pure Drink or Pure Hype?”Natural Resources Deense Council.
5 Mar. 1999. 24 Sept. 2006. < http://nrdc.org/
water/drinking/bw/chap2.asp>
Klessing, Lance. “Bottled Water Industry.”
Spring 2004. 5 Oct. 2006.< http://academic.evergreen.edu/g/grossmaz/
KLESSILL/>
World Health Organization. Bottled Drinking
Water Fact sheet No. 256 October 2000.4 Oct. 2006. < http://www.who.int/mediacen-
tre/actsheets/s256/en/>
Sherri Day. “Suit Disputes Integrity o Poland
Spring Water. “ New York imes [New York,
N.Y.] 20 Jun 2003, Late E dition (East Coast):C.2. New York imes. ProQuest. University o
Connecticut Libraries.
I . N E D .
-
8/21/2019 UConn Free Press Oct. 2006, 2
9/12
9
Intelligent Design Isn’t by Bryan Murphy
One might have hoped that the dead
horse o Intelligent Design had finally
taken out the plastic angs, dropped
the ransylvanian accent, and decidedto stay down. But nope, no way, and
especially not with mid-term elections
coming up. Republican candidate or
the Governor’s office o Michigan, Mr.
Dick DeVos, has brought Intelligent
Design back into the spotlight by say-
ing that he thinks it should at least be
given a air airing in the classroom.
Now, this is somewhat tiring. How
many times must the courts rule that
Intelligent Design, Creationism, and
the like cannot be taught in public
schools beore our putative elected
officials get the message? Darwinistsmay need to try a whole new strain
o garlic to vanquish Intelligent De-
sign. While we’re at it, let’s be rank:
Intelligent Design is Creationism with
a make-over. You fight one, you fight
both; both must be disproved simulta-
neously. We’re gonna need garlic and
a stake or this affair.
he story thus ar is that most
Darwinists have been largely con-
tent to concede that creation is pretty
complex – but not so complex that it
could not have arisen through natural
selection. Yet why not play that recordbackwards?
Backmask Warning, Intelligent De-
signers: Instead o arguing that cre-
ation could have arisen randomly, why
not argue that it couldn’t have arisen
intelligently? Creation is oen pretty
sadistic, evil, and, rankly, stupid. It
seems the overriding theme o our
world is a cacophony o nonsensical
pain and misery, unavoidably punctu-
ated by the terrible rimshot o mortal-
ity. Tis isn’t a newsflash. You’ve got
John Stuart Mill saying, “I there are
any marks at all o special design increation, one o the things most evi-
dently designed is that a large propor-
tion o all animals should pass their
existence in tormenting and devour-
ing other animals.” It’s hard to imagine
our schizoid world was deliberately
designed, least o all intelligently – and
i it was, the designer was pretty sa-
distic.
o be air, one can’t deny that nature
has its moments. Te human body has
at least 25,000 genes, 206 bones, and
over 60,000 miles o veins, arteries,
and capillaries, and it seems hard to
think all o that could have been put
together at random. o trot out an old
Creationist analogy, imagine shaking
a box containing a jumbled up 25,000
piece jigsaw puzzle –what’re the odds
you’d ever assemble the puzzle?
Excepts whoops, evolution is actu-
ally nothing at all like a jigsaw puzzle,
because the current human orm is no
more preerred by nature than any
other random iteration o 25,000 jig-
saw pieces. A more accurate question
to ask would be, i you shook a box
containing 25,000 Legos, what are the
odds you would get any random as-
sortment o Legos? Pretty good, prob-
ably. Sure, some o the random assem-blies would be ugly, but in Darwinian
terms, those ugly assemblies would die
out - in much the same way 99% o
all species which have ever lived have
gone extinct. I there is an intelligent
designer, it apparently does like to play
dice, though it preers playing or the
ates o entire species over our mere
mortal chips.
And even when a species doesn’t
go extinct, there’s no guarantee every-
thing will be coming up roses or its
individual members. Lie can be, and
or most creatures, is, nasty, brutish,and short. Ask your next hamburger i
it thinks the world was designed intel-
ligently by a benevolent being. Ask the
one in our European peasants struck
dead at random by the Black Plague
i they thought the world was put to-
gether in a sensible manner. Next time
you catch the flu, ask yoursel between
sniffles i an intelligent designer would
strike his own creations down at ran-
dom – it doesn’t seem very intelligent
to me. When oyota designs robots to
weld doors on cars, you can be sure
they aren’t programmed to arbitrarilylie in bed or a week every now and
then slurping chicken soup and drink-
ing orange juice. Does oyota know
something our intelligent designer
doesn’t?
Pain serves a useul purpose when it
tells you to pull your hand away rom
that open flame, or lie down because
your leg is bleeding and broken; in
short, when it offers some prospect
o useul remedy. But when pain can
serve no purpose, that’s simple sadism.
ake the case o a cancer victim with
a brain tumor in the middle o theircerebral cortex. What purpose does
their pain serve then, other to insure
that their last days on earth are spent
in unending, incurable agony? Dar-
win noted this quandary o suffering,
the seeming incompatibility between
an intelligent creator and a vicious
world. “I cannot persuade mysel,” he
said, “that a beneficent and omnipo-
tent God would have designedly cre-
ated the Ichneumonidae [a species o
parasitic wasp] with the express inten-
tion o their eeding within the living
bodies o caterpillars”. Our intelligent
designer is shaping up to be quite the
capricious ellow.
And somewhat silly ellow, too.
Men have nipples but don’t lactate;
whales have hip-bones but not legs;
emus have wings but can’t fly. Silly, sa-
distic; sitting at his drawing board, our
intelligent designer must have decided
to spontaneously abort 2/3rds o all
homo sapiens ever conceived. Con-
ception being the resource-intensive
process that it is, our designer certainly
didn’t have economy in mind when he
green-lighted our flawed reproductive
system. Nor was he apparently think-
ing o theology, or i babies that die
beore baptism float about in Limboor all eternity, then it seems Limbo
has twice the population o Heaven
and Hell combined.
However, to be air, Intelligent
Design advocates are careul never
to mention God in their arguments.
he intelligent designer, thereore,
could be anyone. From our evidence,
it seems quite likely that the intel-
ligent designer might well be some
unreliable evil alien struggling to get
his G.E.D.
hough the thought isn’t exactly
comorting. Me, I’d rather not be theplaything o a designer who gives hip-
bones to whales and breast cancer to
old women. I’d rather be the product
o my ancestors, the sublimation o
millennia o evolution, standing on
my own two legs and making my way
through the mutable world o my own
accord. Tere’s something downright
American in that.
Sources:
http://www.classbrain.com/artaskcb/publish/article_145.shtml
http://www.fi.edu/biosci/vessels/vessels.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/20/magazine/20WWLN.html?pagewanted=2&
ei=5090&en=dc8de9614e932be&ex=1266642000&partner=rssuserland?NY_REG_
SUCKS_ROCKS
http://www.woodtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=5446777&nav=0Rce
Te Bible
M S. .
-
8/21/2019 UConn Free Press Oct. 2006, 2
10/12
10
Reusing to Wear the Costume on Halloween
Halloween is a time o disguises and
trick playing, o secretly toilet-pa-
pering houses and smashing amily
jack-o-lanterns: in short, a un t imeor everyone. Surprisingly, the govern-
ment o the United States has decided
not to celebrate Halloween this year.
Instead o wrapping itsel in a color-
ul costume, it is taking the opposite
route by publicly unveiling itsel o the
disguise adopted shortly aer the ter-
rorist attacks on September 11, 2001.
his unveiling process is a com-
plicated one, and is not being done
entirely willingly by the government.
In November 2005, news came out
that the CIA was using government
approved “enhanced interrogationtechniques” to question the detainees
in the War on error. A rather ina-
mous list describing the six enhanced
techniques was circulated through the
media; some defined them as consti-
tuting torture. People began to won-
der: is the United States government
really supporting the use o torture as
a valid interrogation technique? Te
government said no.
hen, in December 2005, John
Bellinger, a state department legal
advisor, admitted to the press that
the Red Cross does not have access toall detainees in U.S. custody—a right
that is guaranteed internationally to all
detainees. Te assumption was then
logically made that the United States
was keeping a number o detainees in
secret prisons across the world. People
began to wonder: is the United States
government really supporting the use
o secret prisons about which even
reputable international aid agencies
are uninormed? he government,
again, said no.
People are, by nature, nosy and per-
sistent creatures, and within the span
o a year, the unveiling was well under-
way. Te President recently gave pub-lic acknowledgement to the existence
o both the “alternative set o proce-
dures” used to interrogate detainees,
and the secret prisons which are now
no longer secret or in operation.
his raises questions, however,
about government accountability.
Who determines what constitutes
torture in detainee prisons? Who de-
termines what inormation should
remain secret, and or how long? Bill
aer bill is being passed through Con-
gress addressing these very issues. Tis
is now a very public debate.
Te Geneva Conventions prohibit
torture and inhuman treatment, in-
cluding the humiliation or degra-
dation o prisoners. It also provides
access to the Red Cross—or all pris-
oners. It does not require a debate to
realize that the United States, in its
recent treatment o detainees, has vio-
lated these Conventions. Te Geneva
Conventions, however, reer only to
prisoners o war. Interestingly enough,
its fiy-year old definition o “prison-
ers o war” does not apply to terrorist
groups. According to the Conven-
tions, and to the government o the
United States, prisoners o war must
be a group affiliated with a State—ter-
rorists may or may not ulfill this re-
quirement— and must wear a “distinc-
tive sign recognizable at a distance.”
Since terrorists generally rely on
anonymity to carry out their attacks,
they do not openly mark themselves
or wear uniorms. Te Conventions
urther speciy that prisoners o war
must “carry arms openly”; in short, the
Geneva Conventions apply only to the
conventional sort o warare that oc-
curred at the time o its creation, and
not to modern terrorism.
oday, times are different and warsare different. Especially the War on
error—which is not so much a war
on a state or even on a group, but on a
broadly interpreted state o being. Ac-
cording to the Military Commission
Act o 2006 (which is a new bill await-
ing approval rom the White House),
a captured terrorist is not a prisoner
o war. errorists all into the group o
“unlawul enemy combatants,” mean-
ing that they do not belong to a state,
they do not clearly mark themselves
as a group, and they do not ollow the
laws o war. Te only problem with
this label is that there is no pre-estab-
lished law in the United States that ap-
plies to the treatment and legal status
o “unlawul enemy combatants.”
Te government o the United States
is currently making a public effort to
create such laws. Te Detainee reat-
ment Act o 2005 is one such law. It
states that no one should be subject
to cruel, inhuman, or degrading treat-
ment and punishment, and specifies
that detainees who are not citizens o
the United States have no claim to the
rights provided by the United States
Constitution. Te Military Commis-
sions Act o 2006 goes more in depth,
providing detainees with the right to
be deemed innocent beore proven
guilty, and the right against compulso-
ry sel-incrimination. It also specifies
that any inormation drawn rom the
detainee under unlawul treatment (as
Secretary o State Condoleezza Rice
said to the press, no one is perect)
cannot be used against him or her in
trial.
rials o the accused detainees will
be under newly established military
commissions, which will be convened
by the Secretary o Deense. Te ac-
cused will be inormed o his or hercharges “as soon as practicable”—else-
where in the bill it states that “unlaw-
ul enemy combatants” do not have
the right to a speedy trial—it is there-
ore unclear what eect this aspect
o the bill will have. he records o
these trials may or may not be made
public out o respect or national se-
curity. Te bill also leaves the Presi-
dent and the Secretary o Deense a
certain amount o room to interpret
“cruel and unusual” and gives them
the power to determine the maximum
punishment o the guilty.
In short, what has been a well-
kept government secret is now being
brought into the public atmosphere,
becoming a topic o public discussion.
In times like this, it is important to
participate. Democracies do not exist
without dialogue, and especially with
the current War on error, it is crucial
that democracy—true democracy, o
and or the people—be upheld.
he Detainee reatment Act o
2005 and the Military Commissions
Act o 2006 can be read at the Library
o Congress’ website: http://thomas.
loc.gov/.
SOURCES:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releas-
es/2006/09/20060906-3.html
http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/91.
htm
http://rwebgate.access.gpo.gov
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4512192.
stm
by Katy Laguzza
-
8/21/2019 UConn Free Press Oct. 2006, 2
11/12
I think I first saw “GOV” used dur-ing the 2004 elections on some pro-gressive blog. I was mystified until Istupidly put it together: “Get Out theVote”. Our party bosses, blogosphereautocrats and co-conspiratorial com-rades have spoken. We letists havebeen given our standing orders intheir execution o the vast le wingconspiracy to take back control othe US government. It’s all lovely andmakes you eel warm and uzzy insideuntil you look at who they’re not only
asking us to vote or but asking us toget other people to vote or. I’m sorrybut it is very hard or an idealistic per-son to campaign or the less-than-evilDemocrat Party line without lookinglike a complete jerk. I say, uck evil,even less-than-evil. I you are a leistin the United States, voting or any-one’s party line is utile because there’sno coherent le party line anymore.I think the best we can do is to lookbeyond the Democrat Party, to Greensand the most green-socialist wing oDemocrats. Tere are rare, rare cas-es where anyone else is worthwhile.Personally, I hate taking orders romany o those pushy Democrat partymachine sellouts who are paid to tryto get you to canvass or them. I youare a progressive please look at all thecandidates and make up your mindabout who reflects your socialist val-ues. Hell, vote Republican i they’re themost progressive candidate.
So, what are the progressive choicesthis time around? Sadly, this electionyou don’t have too many candidates tochoose rom. I’ve got to assume that
almost all o you are like me and live orat least vote somewhere in Connect-icut’s second congressional distr ict.You’ve got a choice or the US Houseo Representatives between the Demo-crat Joe Courtney and Republican RobSimmons, nobody else. Given thateach candidate is a liberal on socialissues and fiscally conservative I’d saydon’t even bother even voting or thisone. Leave the lever be.
I you live anywhere in Connecti-cut you can vote or some slightly
more exciting races. One example isthe race or Governor or whom youcan select Democrat John Desteano,Republican Jodi Rell, or my avorite,Green Clifford Tornton. It’s really sadthat Desteano is such an ass that heconspired to keep Tornton out o thegubernatorial debates. Tornton hasa lot o articulate messages and hasgreat appeal, especially to students.Examples o his awesomeness includehis passionate arguments or endingthe current drug prohibition that killsso many and wastes so much moneyevery year, ully unding state tuitionor Connecticut residents, and ullUniversal health care to name a ew. Ithink it’s clear that to the vast major-ity o Uconn students Tornton is theonly reasonable option. Let’s not kidourselves: it’s in our interest to elimi-nate tuition and legalize drugs!
Te green party is also running can-didates or other elected positions inConnecticut that get lamentably lessmedia coverage than they deserve.I you are a an o our radio stationWHUS, then you’re probably amil-
iar with Mike DeRosa’s “New Focus”.Well, DeRosa is running or Secretaryo State as the Green Candidate. SusanBysiewicz, the Democrat incumbent,has had this job orever and let’s aceit, our state’s business community isnot exactly the most well regulated.Nancy Burton’s Green candidacy orAttorney general should be supportedor the same reason: Richard Blumen-thal has been in FOREVER. Also, Bur-ton would go aer polluters with argreater zeal. As students, we have a
duty to make sure our state is sae notonly rom Islamists abroad but romcancer causing pollution at home.
Another more interesting race is orsenate. I know that you probably haveread a lot about it already and alreadyknow that it’s the most interestingrace ever in the history o Connecti-cut politics. Te main candidates areDemocrat Ned Lamont, RepublicanAlan Schlesinger, Green Ralph Fer-rucci, and Connecticut or LiebermanParty (a one man party – lame ass!)Joe Lieberman. For college studentsthe only really good choice is Ferrucci,not only because the Green Party plat-orm is most in line with our interestsbut also the senate is supposed to beespecially concerned with US oreignpolicy. Ferrucci takes a ar more even-handed approach to oreign policythan any others, especially in solvingthe Middle East conflicts and is theonly candidate who says he would doso – thus he almost earns my vote.I wish I could say that Lamont waspretty decent too but I’m araid he’sgot some terrible status-quo moder-
GOV: A Scary Acronym that Subverts Democracy
ate ideas except that he’s opposed tothe war in Iraq. Because Liebermanis ahead in the polls and since out oall the candidates Lieberman is theonly one to support continued mili-tary involvement in Iraq and every-where else, I’d say this is the one othose rare times progressives shouldsuck it up and vote or a lame-o. ohave the sensible vote split betweenthe three other non-evil candidateswould be a shame. Hold your noseor whatever, but you should probably
pull the Lamont lever.Come November 7th, election day,I say go out and vote but don’t get outthe vote. Electoral politics are not areasonable way to reorm the system– that’s something you need to doevery day, least o all on election day.Realize that party bosses are bossesall the same and are out or their ownpower and benefit. Sure they’ll offeryou concessions to work or ‘em andall but don’t sell-out. You’re subvertingdemocracy when you do and hurtingyourselves, America, and the idealsyou stand or. I’m voting this time orsome moderates because some veryscary people will be elected other-wise. However, I hope you will join mein making plans now or what to donext time. We should lay the ground-work now to kick out these moder-ates and throw a wrench in the partymachines, finally making progressivechanges possible or our country andthe world.
11
Te Bitterness Behind Each Bite
Children think o Halloween as a sweetand scary holiday. Tis is the one timeo the year that they are allowed to in-dulge in all o the chocolate that theywant. Pretty much every Americanamily buys at least one bag o candy
during this holiday, which amounts tohuge profits by the chocolate corpora-tions. While these American childrenare busy filling their bodies with sugarand scaring each other with witch andghost costumes, children in the IvoryCoast are acing a situation ar morebitter and ar more scary. Te choco-late that American children are enjoy-ing has come at the cost o the paino the child slave laborers on cocoaplantations. Something that is reallyrightul is seeing your riends beingbeaten, seeing your own blood leakrom your innocent flesh, seeing nouture.
he University o Connecticutbrought a speaker and photographer,Robin Romano, to speak about thehuman rights abuses on cocoa plan-tations in the Ivory Coast. Te IvoryCoast produces 43% o the world’s co-coa. It is a country that is highly in-debted due to structural adjustmentpolicies. In recent years its povertyhas doubled and its literacy rates have
been cut in hal. Spending on socialservices have been greatly reduced.Its economy depends on the chocolateindustry, and the cheap labor o thechildren. All powers are against theseinnocent ones. Both the government
and chocolate corporations want tosuppress any protest.Te poor economic situation o the
Ivory Coast and surrounding coun-tries sends children out o the homein search or work since their parentscannot support them, and since edu-cation is an expensive option that ewcan afford. Te child is oen lured inby a trafficker who offers them the op-portunity or lots o money. Te naïvechild and oen amily are encouragedby this prospect, and do not suspectnegative consequences. Children areoten taken across the border romMali into the Ivory Coast by traffick-ers, who then sell the child to the co-coa plantations or a low price. Techildren find themselves ar away romhome, in a strange place tucked intothe woods, where there are no roadsout, and no opportunity o escape.
One o the first things that they areshown are the sights where they will beburied i they try to escape or protest.I the child reuses to work they may
be beaten to death or have their eetsliced off. One child had his eet cutoff simply because the overseers elthe looked too strong and needed to bedebilitated in some way. Te childrenare let in hopeless situations. hey
have very little ood, and no clothes.I they are sick, they won’t be treated.Yet even while they are malnourishedand ill, they are expected to have theenergy to work all day long. o keepthem passive, they are drugged upwith ermented cocoa juice.
While the corporations are mak-ing huge profits off o the slave laboro these children, the armers are still just getting by, and the country is all-ing deeper and deeper into despair.o prevent this exploitation, Romanourged us all to avoid buying choco-late rom major corporations such asNestlé, Hershey, and Mars. Insteadyou should buy air trade chocolate.Tis sets a minimum wage that labor-ers must be given as well as standardsor treatment. One o the most wellknown air trade companies is EqualExchange, and it can be ound at manylocal stores such as the WillimanticFood Coop. U.S. consumers have alot o economic power. Corporationsonly stay alive through our purchas-
ing o their products. Tereore, I urgeanyone who cares about human rightsto boycott products made by abusivecorporations, and support ones thatare trying to promote human rights.
Te Univerity o Connecticut indi-
rectly supports child slavery by sellingonly Hershey’s chocolate in the caes.As an institution that boasts its greathuman rights department and ide-ology, it ought to not be supportingcompanies that do not adhere to suchpractices. Students can do their part bypressuring the administration to breaktheir ties with corrupt corporations.
On top o this, as Halloween is ap-proaching, when you go out to thestore to stock up on sweets or yourparties, please think about more thanthe instant gratification o the taste,the allure o the packaging, and theprice. Always think about the story be-hind the products you buy. What wentinto the production o this product?What social and environmental rami-fications are involved? Uconn studentsare privileged Americans and can a-ord moral consumption. Halloweendoesn’t have to be as bitter and scary asit is or the anonymous children whosuffer to satisy our sweet cravings.
by tara kurland
by Damon Yakovleff
-
8/21/2019 UConn Free Press Oct. 2006, 2
12/12
8:30-9:30 pm
7pm
12 - 1 pm
6 - 7:30 pm
All Day
4 - 5 pm
7 - 8 pm
6 - 7:30 pm
6 pm
All Day
5pm
6:30 pm
Mondays
Mondays
Oct 16
Oct 17
Oct 18
Oct 19
Oct 19
Oct 24
Nov 1
Nov 7
Nov 7
Nov 7
Between Women - or women who love women.
Movie Mondays
Conronting the Myths o Domestic Violence
SOS – Massage
9th Annual Love Your Body Day
Hidden Narratives: Te Black Freedom Movement ...
Movie – CHISHOLM ‘72: Unbought & Unbossed
SOS - Guided Meditation
Charmain White Face, and others.
Election Day
“How Black Public Intellectuals are Failing Black America”
Fundraiser or the Willimantic Radical Lending Library
Women’s Center
Rainbow Center
CUE Building, Storrs Campus
Women’s Center
Everywhere
Class o 1947 Room, Babbidge Library
Women’s Center
Women’s Center
Student Union Ballroom
Everywhere
Dodd Center, room 162
Oobah’s Deli. Willimantic
events
CO N TR I B U TOR S
Andrew BaconJoelle CohnDavid F. CrouseChad “Bourner” DentonEric Drooker
Joshua FaucherGaping Voidim GorinKatie Gregory Dan HammondDavid Huck Salmun KazerounianAlexander Kobulnicky ara KurlandKaty Laguzza
Married to the SeaBryan Murphy John SchreiberCassie UptonAmy Vanheuverzwyn
Ashley WidteldtDora WilkeneldDamon Yakovleff
UConn Free Press is an alternative student-run newspaper. We arean anti-profit weekly publication serving the university and local
community. We are dedicated to carrying out the tradition o partici-patory democracy through staff consensus in all matters concerningthe paper. Open meeting times are available on the website.We welcome article and art submissions via www.uconnreepress.orgor [email protected]. Consider, criticize, and debate.