ubc earthquake design

Upload: ajbajb

Post on 01-Jun-2018

232 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 UBC Earthquake Design

    1/15

    1997 UBC Earthquake Design

    Introduction

    Seismic forces are a particularly important consideration for 

    engineers working in the Western U.S. where the frequency

    of earthquake occurrences is common.

    Seismic building forces are the result of the sudden

    movement and rupturing of crustal plates along fault lines.

    There are more than 160 known active faults in

    California alone.

     New faults continued to be discovered, usually whenan unexpected earthquake occurs.

    When a fault slip occurs suddenly, it generates seismic

    shock waves that travel through the ground in a

    manner unlike that of tossing a pebble onto the

    surface of calm water.

    These seismic waves cause the ground to shake.

    The effect of this dynamic ground motion can be simply

    modeled using a cereal box standing upon a piece of sand 

     paper.

    Upon yanking the paper, the box topples in the direction

    opposite of the yank, as if a pushing force had been applied to the box.

    The heavier the box, the greater the apparent applied force

    which is called an inertia force.

    As the ground moves suddenly, the building attempts to

    remain stationary, generating the inertia induced seismic

    forces that are approximated by the static lateral force

     procedure covered here.

    This procedure is introduced in UBC '97 1629.8.3 and 

    discussed in detail in UBC '97 1630.

    The static force procedure is limited to use with regular structures less than 240 feet in height.

    And, also to irregular structures £ 65 feet or 5 stories in

    height.

    2 9/16/2010 12:09 PM

  • 8/9/2019 UBC Earthquake Design

    2/15

    See UBC '97 1629.8.3 for exact definition of 

    limitations.

    Regular structures are symmetric, without

    discontinuities in plan or elevation.

    The building plan is generally rectangular.

    The mass is reasonably uniform throughout the

     building's height.

    The shear walls line up from story to story.

    Irregular structures include both vertical irregularities

    (UBC Table 16-L) or plan irregularities (UBC Table

    16-M). These irregular features include:

    Reentrant corners.

    Large openings in diaphragms.

     Non-uniform distribution of mass or stiffness

    over building height (e.g. soft story).

    Basic premise of seismic code provisions:

    Earthquake Damage to Structure

    Minor None

    Moderate Some damage to non-structural elements

    Major Maybe severe damage, but not collapse.

    Seismic zones in U.S. (UBC '97 Figure No. 16-2):

    Zones Damage to Structure MMI* Scale

    0 No Damage -----

    1 Minor V, VI

    2 Moderate VII

    3 Major   ³ VII

    4 Major -----

    *MMI = Modified Mercalli Intensity scale of 1933.

     

    2 9/16/2010 12:09 PM

  • 8/9/2019 UBC Earthquake Design

    3/15

    1997 UBC Earthquake Design

    Modeling Forces

    1997 UBC static lateral method considers both horizontal

    movement and vertical ground movement.

    The vertical component may be taken as zero,

    however, when using the allowable stress design

     procedure.

    We statically model the inertial effects using Newton's 2nd 

    law of motion:

    Rewrite equation (1) as:

    Compare (2) to UBC base shear design equations, as given

     below, where each equation is a function of the building

    weight and some form of an acceleration factor.

    Each acceleration factor is somewhat equivalent to

    a/g, except they account for factors like underlying

    soil, the structural system, and building occupancy.

    Where:

    V= base shear force. The horizontal seismic force

    acting at the base of the structure as modeled by the"yank" of the paper in the previous cereal box

    example. It is important to note that this force was

    developed for the strength design methodology and 

    3 9/16/2010 12:11 PM

  • 8/9/2019 UBC Earthquake Design

    4/15

  • 8/9/2019 UBC Earthquake Design

    5/15

  • 8/9/2019 UBC Earthquake Design

    6/15

    1997 UBC Earthquake Design

    Base Shear Terms

    In this section, the various terms of the static base shear equation

    are examined in more detail.

    Z = seismic zone factor.

    Effective peak ground accelerations with 10%

     probability of being exceeded in 50 yrs.

    Given as a percentage of acceleration due to gravity.

    For example, consider zone 4, where Z = .4 Þ

    horizontal ground acceleration is predicted at .4g

    at bedrock.

    Doesn't account for building dynamic properties or 

    local soil conditions.'97 UBC Figure 16.2 Þ seismic zone map.

    Table 16.I Þ Z values as given below:

    Zone Z

    0 0

    1 .075

    2A .15

    2B .20

    3 .30

    4 .40

    I = importance factor.

    Classifying buildings according to use and importance.

    Essential facilities, hazardous facilities, special

    occupancy structures, standard occupancy

    structures, miscellaneous structures.

    Essential facilities mean that the building must

    remain functioning in a catastrophe.

    Essential facilities include: hospitals,

    communication centers, fire and police stations.

    Design for greater safety.'97 UBC Table 16-K.

    I = 1.25 for essential and hazardous facilities.

    I = 1.0 all others.

    5 9/16/2010 12:12 PM

  • 8/9/2019 UBC Earthquake Design

    7/15

    T = building's fundamental period of vibration.

    Fundamental period of vibration is the length of time,

    in seconds, it takes a structure to move through one

    complete cycle of free vibration in the first mode.

    There are two methods to estimate T:

    Method A:

    Method B: (an iterative approach not generally

    used in regular structures)

    Using Method A, the fundamental period of 

    vibrations for masonry buildings is estimated at:

    Height (ft) Period (seconds)

    20 .19

    40 .32

    60 .43

    120 .73

    160 .90

    Ca and Cv = seismic dynamic response spectrum values.

    Accounts for how the building and soil can amplify the

     basic ground acceleration or velocity.

    Ca and Cv are determined from respectively '97 UBC

    tables 16-Q and 16-R as a function of Z, underlying

    soil conditions, and proximity to a fault.

    Using method A,

    Soil profile type:

    The soil layers beneath a structure effects the

    way that structure responds to the earthquake

    motion.

    5 9/16/2010 12:12 PM

  • 8/9/2019 UBC Earthquake Design

    8/15

    When the period of vibration of the building is

    close to the period of vibration of the underlying

    soil, the bedrock motion is amplified. The

     building experiences larger motions than that

     predicted by Z alone. The following are

    generalizations about building response as a

    function of building flexibility and underlying

    soil stiffness.

    Building

    Description

    Soil

    Description

    Induced 

    Seismic Force

    Flexible (Large

    T's)Soft (big S) Higher  

    Flexible Stiff Lower  

    Stiff Soft Higher  

    Flexible Stiff Lower  

    The soil profile types are:

    Description Type

    Hard Rock  SA

    Rock  SB

    Very dense soil and soft rock  SC

    Stiff soil SD

    Soft soil SE

    See '97 UBC 1629.3.1 SF

    Specific details about each type can be found in

    '97 UBC Table 16-J and '97 UBC 1629.3.1.

    In the absence of a geotechnical site investigation, use

    SD. This is in accordance with '97 UBC 1629.3

    Do not confuse this requirement with the one

    stated in '97 UBC 1630.2.3.2 which applies

    ONLY when using the simplified design base

    shear procedures of '97 UBC 1630.2.3. This website is NOT using these simplified procedures,

     but is using 1630.2.1.

    R = response modification factor.

    5 9/16/2010 12:12 PM

  • 8/9/2019 UBC Earthquake Design

    9/15

    A judgement factor that accounts for building ductiltiy,

    damping, and over-strength.

    Ductility = ability to deform in the inelastic

    range prior to fracture:

    Damping = resistance to motion provided by

    internal material friction.

    Over-strength = the extra or reserve strength inthe structural system. It comes from the practice

    of designing every member in a group according

    to the forces in the most critical member of that

    group.

    Structural systems with larger R = better seismic

     performance.

    In '97 UBC Table 16-N, R range from 2.8 (light steel

    frame bearing walls with tension bracing) to 8.5

    (special SMRFS of steel or concrete and some dual

    systems).For bearing wall systems where the wall elements

    resist both lateral and vertical loads:

    Wood shear panel buildings with 3 or less

    stories: R = 5.5

    Masonry shear walls: R = 4.5.

     

     Nv and Na = near source factors that are applicable in only

    seismic zone 4. They account for the very large ground 

    accelerations that occur near the seismic source (the fault).

     Nv is generally used with Cv for structures located <

    9.3 miles (15km) from the fault.

     Nv is found in '97 UBC Table 16-T

    5 9/16/2010 12:12 PM

  • 8/9/2019 UBC Earthquake Design

    10/15

     Na is used with Ca for structures located < 6.2 miles

    (10 km) from the fault.

     Na is found in '97 UBC Table 16-S.

    Both Na and Nv are based upon the type of seismic

    source, A-C. This source type, and location of fault,

    must be established using approved geotechnical data

    like a current USGS survey.

    5 9/16/2010 12:12 PM

  • 8/9/2019 UBC Earthquake Design

    11/15

    1997 UBC Earthquake Design

    Distribution of Seismic Forces to Primary LFRS

     Now that we have the base shear force, what type of 

    induced forces act through the height of the building?

    How to model the inertial force that acts opposite to

    yank of paper on the cereal box?

    Recall for wind loads

    First, calculate loads/pressures over the height of 

     building.Then developed base values.

    These values are at the allowable stress level.

    In contrast, with seismic -

    First, determine base force.

    Then determine and distribute forces over the height

    of the building, called story forces, Fx.

    There are two different sets of story forces distributed 

    to the primary LFRS:

    For vertical elements, use Fx.

    For horizontal elements, use F px

    .

    Recall that the primary LFRS for a box building

    = horizontal diaphragms and vertical shear 

    walls.

    Then adjust these strength level forces by a

    redundancy/reliability factor, r, and an allowable

    stress factor of 1.4 discussed further in item d, below.

    Story forces for vertical elements.

    Used in design of shear walls and shear wall anchorage

    at the foundation.

    Determined before F px's.Applied simultaneously at all levels.

    Results in a triangular distribution of forces over a

    multi-story building that has approximately equal floor 

    masses.

    and 

    a.

    4 9/16/2010 12:12 PM

  • 8/9/2019 UBC Earthquake Design

    12/15

    Where:

    Ft = roof level force accounting for whiplash

    effect.

    Ft{.07TV £ .25V or 

    0 if T £ .7 sec.

    wx, wi = tributary weights at levels x and i.

    hx, hi = height above base to levels x and i.

    further detail can be found in '97 UBC 1630.5.

    Story forces for horizontal elements.

    At roof level, F px = Fx.

    At other levels, F px > Fx.

    Accounting for the possibility that larger instantaneous

    forces can occur on individual diaphragms.

    Applied individually to each level for the design of 

    that diaphragm.

    where w px = weight of diaphragm and elements

    tributary to it at level x.

    For masonry buildings (and concrete) supported by

    flexible diaphragms, the R factor used to determine V

    must be reduced to 4.0 from 4.5 ('97 UBC 1633.2.9.3).

    For more information see '97 UBC 1630.6.

     b.

    The single story building is a special case.

    In most cases, T £ .7 and Ft then is taken as zero.

    c.

    4 9/16/2010 12:12 PM

  • 8/9/2019 UBC Earthquake Design

    13/15

    From equation 30-15:

    From equation 33-1:

    Consequently, F1 = F p1 = V for the case of wood 

    frame buildings.

    For masonry buildings, F p, is based upon a slightly

    larger V due to R changing from 4.5 to 4.0 according

    to '97 UBC 1633.2.9.3. In this case, then: F1 = V and 

    F p1 = 1.125 V.

    Redundancy/reliability factor and the 1.4 ASD adjustment:

    In the load combination equations as discussed in the

    last sub-module in the load module of this site, all

    earthquake forces are generically called E.

    Where:

    Eh = load developed from V, (like Fx or F px) or 

    F p, (the design force on a part of a structure).

    Ev = 0 for ASD

    r = redundancy/reliability factor, discussed 

     below.

    E is at strength level and must be divided by 1.4 for 

    use in allowable stress design.

    The application of 1.4 and p are shown in

    example one of this sub-module.

    The redundancy/reliability factor penalizes structuresin seismic zones 3 and 4 that do not have a reasonable

    number and distribution of lateral force resisting

    elements, such as shear walls. These structures with a

    limited number of shearwalls are referred to as

    non-redundant structures where the failure of one wall

    loads to the total collapse of the structure.

    Where:

    AB = the ground floor area of the structure in

    d.

    4 9/16/2010 12:12 PM

  • 8/9/2019 UBC Earthquake Design

    14/15

    ft2.

    r max = maximum element-story shear ratio, r i,

    occurring at any story level in bottom 2/3 of the

    structure. r max identifies the least redundant

    story.

    r i = R wall/R story(10/lw)

    Where:

    R wall = shear in most heavily loaded wallR story = total story force, Fx

    lw = length of most heavily loaded shear 

    wall.

    r = 1 when in seismic zones 0, 1, or 2.

    r = 1 when calculating drift.

    Upon careful inspection of the r and r i equation

    with application to a single story, regular 

     building, we see:

    To maintain a r = 1.0, the minimum length

    of the most heavily loaded shear wall isfixed as:

    If a flexible diaphragm, a common

    controlling case will be when R wall/R story

    = .5.

    In this case then to keep r =1.0.

    Although the Breyer, et al book uses the subscript "u"

    to distinguish strength-level vs. allowable stress-level

    loads, I have opted for a different convention that I

     believe is simpler.

    Upon modifying the various Eh values by r and 

    1.4, Eh becomes E'h. For our single story

     building, the shear wall forces and diaphragm

    forces at ASD level would look like:

    F'1 = rF

    1 (1/1.4)

    F'1 = rF p1 (1/1.4)

    4 9/16/2010 12:12 PM

  • 8/9/2019 UBC Earthquake Design

    15/15

    1997 UBC Earthquake Design

    Example 1

    Develop the applicable seismic forces for a one-story, box-type industrial

     building located in Southern California. Assume partially grouted CMU

    walls weighing 61 lb/ft2,

    a roof dead load of 9 psf, and the building is not

    located near (further than 9.3 miles) a seismic source. No geotechnical

    investigation was completed.

    Base shear coefficient, V.

    The base shear equation(s) are quite cumbersome to use,

    unless on knows beforehand which equation governs.

    Recall that middle equation is for buildings medium to

    long fundamental T's. The left-hand equations are lower 

     bound values. The right-hand equation is for short (stiff)

    T buildings.

    You can determine if its the right-hand equation quickly

     by comparing the building's T to Ts:

    TS is a limiting period of vibration that is used to

    differentiate between stiff and flexible buildings.

    The seismically-induced forces in stiff buildings

    are related to the bedrock acceleration. The

    forces in flexible buildings are related more to

     bedrock velocity.

    1.