two dimensional simulation of a dam break wave propagation for the isolated building test case...

12
Two Dimensional simulation of a Dam Break wave propagation for the isolated building test case University of Pavia Gabriella Petaccia Impact Workshop... Louvian La Neuve, November 2003

Upload: gordon-dennis-newton

Post on 18-Jan-2016

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Two Dimensional simulation of a Dam Break wave propagation for the isolated building test case University of Pavia Gabriella Petaccia Impact Workshop

Two Dimensional simulation of a Dam Break wave propagation for the isolated building test case

University of Pavia

Gabriella Petaccia

Impact Workshop...

Louvian La Neuve, November 2003

Page 2: Two Dimensional simulation of a Dam Break wave propagation for the isolated building test case University of Pavia Gabriella Petaccia Impact Workshop

MATHEMATICAL MODEL

DISCRETIZATION

NUMERICAL SOLVER

Shallow water equations

Finite Volume

I order Upwind (Roe)

SOURCE TERMS SCHEMATIZATION

Bottom slope

Pointwise

(Valiani et al 2002)

Upwind-Mass balance equation

4

,100

kkkGw

V

VSzzgdVSxx

3

333

11

233

211

133

111

,

~1~1

~1~1

~1~1

eses

eses

eses

A

lt

i

ji

c

zhg

c

zhg

~2

~0~2

~

13

2

1

(Bermudez et al 1998)

Friction term3/7

112

ni

ni

nixn

ifh

qqnS

x

3/7

112

ni

ni

niyn

if h

qqnS

y

Page 3: Two Dimensional simulation of a Dam Break wave propagation for the isolated building test case University of Pavia Gabriella Petaccia Impact Workshop

CFL 0.7

12945 elements

G1 G2

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

t(s)

h(m

)

experimental data

pointwise

upwind

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

t(s)

h(m

)

experimental data

pointwise

upwind

Page 4: Two Dimensional simulation of a Dam Break wave propagation for the isolated building test case University of Pavia Gabriella Petaccia Impact Workshop

G4G3

G5 G6

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0 5 10 15 20 25 30t (s)

h (

m)

experimental data

pointwise

upwind

bil=0.5% upwind

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

bil=0.1% pointwise

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

t (s)

h(m

)

experimental data

pointwise

upwind

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

t(s)

h(m

)

experimental data

pointwise

upwind

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

t(s)

h(m

)

experimental data

pointwise

upwind

Page 5: Two Dimensional simulation of a Dam Break wave propagation for the isolated building test case University of Pavia Gabriella Petaccia Impact Workshop

upwind

pointwise

VELOCITY FIELD T=1 s

Page 6: Two Dimensional simulation of a Dam Break wave propagation for the isolated building test case University of Pavia Gabriella Petaccia Impact Workshop

t=1s

t=5s

Page 7: Two Dimensional simulation of a Dam Break wave propagation for the isolated building test case University of Pavia Gabriella Petaccia Impact Workshop

t=10s

t=20s

Page 8: Two Dimensional simulation of a Dam Break wave propagation for the isolated building test case University of Pavia Gabriella Petaccia Impact Workshop

NORM OF VELOCITY FIELD t= 1 s

Page 9: Two Dimensional simulation of a Dam Break wave propagation for the isolated building test case University of Pavia Gabriella Petaccia Impact Workshop

NORM OF VELOCITY FIELD t= 2 s

Page 10: Two Dimensional simulation of a Dam Break wave propagation for the isolated building test case University of Pavia Gabriella Petaccia Impact Workshop

NORM OF VELOCITY FIELD t= 5 s

Page 11: Two Dimensional simulation of a Dam Break wave propagation for the isolated building test case University of Pavia Gabriella Petaccia Impact Workshop

NORM OF VELOCITY FIELD t= 10 s

Page 12: Two Dimensional simulation of a Dam Break wave propagation for the isolated building test case University of Pavia Gabriella Petaccia Impact Workshop

Conclusions

•I order finite volume solver employing two different treatments of source terms has been applied to the isolated test case

•The comparisons between measured and simulated data is acceptable, the wave propagation is slower than in the experiments, the maximum water depth values are almost represented

•The upwind treatment seems more accurate in the gauges close to the building and reproduces more correctly the emptying phenomena

Thank you for your attention!!