tunnel support - ammsa.org.za
TRANSCRIPT
One Team One Vision With Pride 2
Disclaimer
The material in this presentation is for information purposes only.
The material has been prepared for ease of communication, rather than
technical correctness, and should not be considered in isolation or as
the final word on the subject.
The photographs shown may show conditions and activities that are not
necessarily accepted practice, and their source will remain anonymous.
The opinions are those of the author, and may not necessarily represent
the official viewpoint of Impala Platinum Limited.
One Team One Vision With Pride 3
Basics
Primary support
Installed at the working face by development crew
Typically some type of tendon (bolt) in a set pattern
One Team One Vision With Pride 5
Basics
Primary support
Installed at the working face by development crew
Typically some type of tendon (bolt) in a set pattern
Secondary support
Installed behind the face by specialist crew
Typical examples include shotcrete, meshing and lacing
One Team One Vision With Pride 7
Basics
Primary support
Installed at the working face by development crew
Typically some type of tendon (bolt) in a set pattern
Secondary support
Installed behind the face by specialist crew
Typical examples include shotcrete, meshing and lacing
Tertiary support
Installed as rehabilitation / consolidation by specialist crew
Typical examples include sets, arches, void filling, cable anchors
One Team One Vision With Pride 9
Functions of different types / units
Tendons / bolts - Pin loose blocks, reinforce tunnel “skin”
Mesh and lacing - Provide areal coverage, keep smaller
blocks from falling out, allow “yielding” capability
Cable anchors – extend reinforced tunnel “skin”, suspend
beam above tunnel, consolidate different layers
Shotcrete / Thin Sprayed Liner – provide sealing, keep
“rock fabric” intact between tendons / bolts
Steel arches / ring sets – create artificial tunnel “lining”,
provide yielding ability in “squeezing” ground conditions
One Team One Vision With Pride 10
The correct support – at the right time!
Frequency of Falls of Ground from the face on Development
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-20
Distance from the Development Face
No.
of F
OG
's
One Team One Vision With Pride 17
Mindmap for areal support
Geotechnical condition
Injury risk
Protect peoplein face
Remove peoplefrom face
Stability risk
Support system design
Excavation profile
Mechanisation Shotcrete on face
May only need bolting
Temporary areal support on face,
follow-on shotcrete
Cycle time delays
May not be ideal shape
Logistical and practical issues
Areal support in back area, but may need on face
Risk not totally eliminated
One Team One Vision With Pride 18
Blocky ground – Full Areal coverage
Potential risk reduced to the absolute minimum
One Team One Vision With Pride 19
Fractured rock – full areal coverage
Footwall-to-footwall shotcrete will eliminate the potential of toppling
of sidewall slabs created by
stress fracturingand/or
blocky ground
One Team One Vision With Pride 21
Shotcrete - benefits and penalties
Benefits: Effective long-term sealant and support
If on face, full-time areal coverage for mining crew• Reduced exposure to unsupported rock
• Reduced rock-related risk, improved safety performance
Penalties: Logistical implications (shaft, material)
Longer mining cycles, require better planning
Delays to project programme
Increased cost of project
One Team One Vision With Pride 22
Why Thin Sprayed Liners?
Ongoing development of these products
Shorter spray times 30 minutes for TSLs versus 130 minutes for shotcrete
Drastic reduction in material required 1 or 2 bags/m2 for TSL versus 7 or 8 bags/m2 for shotcrete
Simple logistics One bag, one bottle mix in most cases
Reduced impact on mining cycle
One Team One Vision With Pride 23
Impala TSL trial progress
Eight products identified from five suppliers
Varying degrees of success, particularly blast resistance
One Team One Vision With Pride 28
Impala TSL trial progress
Eight products identified from five suppliers
Varying degrees of success, particularly blast resistance
Three products selected for extended trial