troubled families
DESCRIPTION
Troubled Families. Mags Walsh Programme Director 9 th July 2012. Prime Minister & Leicestershire’s Ambition for Our Troubled Families “ Last year the state spent an estimated £9 billion on just 120,000 families… …that is around £75,000 per family. David Cameron 15th Dec 2011. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Troubled Families
Mags WalshProgramme Director
9th July 2012
2
Prime Minister & Leicestershire’s Ambition for Our Troubled Families
“Last year the state spent an estimated £9 billion on just 120,000 families……that is around £75,000 per family.
David Cameron 15th Dec 2011
1. Significantly improving outcomes for families and their children
2. Reducing the current costs of public services
“Our heart tells us we can’t just stand by… Our head tells us we can’t afford to keep footing the
monumental bills for social failure. we have got to take action to turn troubled families around”
David Cameron, 15th December 2011
Louise Casey Unit Ambition
“Success is bigger than the payment by results model…I want to see real system change…this is about changing the mainstream. The Programme needs to catalyse sustainable reform of services in order to prevent future families from becoming ‘TF’ and to deliver significant cost savings to the State”
“My ‘manna from heaven’ is that a 3 year focus on the family’s needs will result in the number of agencies involved with them will reduce from, say, 17 to 2”
“This will be different because it will focus on individual families and their needs, rather than individual services”
3
Founding PrinciplesApproved by Programme Board June 2011
Place’ and ‘citizens’ before ‘organisation’ Place shared vision, objectives and services Pro-active co-design between partners in the place and between the place
& Whitehall Prevention by early and earlier intervention Better outcomes at less cost Fully understand the problem before defining a solution Ambitious & if appropriate radical local innovation Build on good practice /initiatives in place in Leicestershire i.e. Integrated
Offender Model, Children’s Centres, YOS, Systems Change, many others
Decommission & reprioritise services when required Pooled /aligned budgets around the theme/place
4
Ethnography 3 Workshops Individual
family consultation
Customer Journey
Needs Assessment
Customer Journey maps
9 families 21 adults, 13 CYP 9 familiesCraig's story
(Beacon project)Child Poverty Mental Health
Desk based research
Other Insight
SE
CO
ND
AR
Y
RE
SE
AR
CH Evidence base for family models Current/emerging policy
Melton Family Model Mapping Families LIFE - Swindon pilot
Practitioner Insight
Family Insight
Full day practitioner workshop - 135 practitioners, cross agency
PR
IMA
RY
RE
SE
AR
H
Family InsightA comprehensive approach
The detailed Insight report is now published on the Leicestershire Together Website: www.leicestershiretogether.org/partnerships/communitybudgets
Barriers to Families
6
What Must Change
Earlier Intervention
Shared vision and stronger leadership
Family-centric, not organisation-centric
approaches to working
Re-training/ attitude ofworkforce
Sharedprocesses /
systems
Informationsharing
Advocate / Key Family
Worker
Politics / resources
Better joint working
Community
From insight phase: practitioner event 7
Barriers highlighted by Aperia
The range of support and access to support is confusing, services are not joined up, are complex, and they don’t know what is available so they didn’t get the help that perhaps does exist
Services start and then stop and it is confusing – not one individual felt that their personal goals were clearly and openly aligned to the objectives of the services – hence they personally felt that nothing had changed, but services were stopped as the service felt that a goal had been achieved
People don’t listen, are too quick to judge and don’t really understand Services are reactive, based on crisis prevention and short term
interventions Services are set up to dealt with single issues i.e. offending, domestic
violence, mental health and not ‘whole family’ or ‘whole person’ approach Families often feel services work against them, not with / for them
8
Barriers highlighted by Aperia
Lack of education - many attendees regretted that they felt unprepared and ill-trained for the lives that they live. This is both at an educational attainment level and also in terms of the skills to be able to manage and run their own homes
Their past / lack of role models – some people commented that it is hardly surprising that they are currently suffering the problems that they face given their experiences / lives to date. Some referenced directly that they feel there are not enough role models for them or their children. This was a very strong view from practitioners and echoed, although less precisely, by service users
9
What we learned from the Insight Phase…
Confusing landscape of public services
Poor/overcrowded housing (incl. homelessness)
High risk behaviours (incl. substance misuse)
Poverty (incl. debt & unemployment)
Health (incl. mental health & disability)
Crime (offending and experience of)
Lack of education/ attainment Domestic violence Poor parenting
Difficulties maintaining relationships (incl. family, friends, peers, isolation & social marginalisation)
Lack of resilience (incl. capability, capacity, confidence & inability to cope)
Lack of or limited choice/control Adverse effect on aspirations/
perception of social mobility
Common issues for FCN
What Parents said they want most from Services
Stability, support, encouragement, consistency To be listened to and acknowledged People to do what they say they’re going to do and to get
back to them Freedom from prejudice/social marginalisation Services to work for and not against them Have their own needs addressed as well as their children’s
Reoccurring Themes from Evidence Base, Current Literature and National Policy on What
works:
Early intervention Building resilience Stability, continuity and
transitions Effective parenting and
supporting families Tackling educational
performance
Tackling worklessness Tackling poor health Tackling poverty Involving communities and
building social capital Building capabilities, resilience
and skills development
12
Mother has mental health problems
No parent in the family is working
Family lives in poor-quality or overcrowded housing
No parent has any qualifications
At least one parent has a long-standing limiting illness, disability or infirmity
Family cannot afford a number of food and clothing items
Family has low income (below 60% of the median)
Poor parenting
Truancy, exclusion or low educational attainment
Family in debt
Drugs or alcohol misuse
Marriage, relationship or family breakdown
Domestic violence
Child protection issues
Risk factors attributed to families with 5 or more disadvantages (from) Families At Risk: Background on families with multiple disadvantages, Social Exclusion Taskforce Research Report, 2007
Additional risk factors from families supported through family intervention (NatCen, Mar 2010).
Child Behavioural Problems
Child Substance abuse problems
Teenage Parent(s)
NEET
Child is a carer
Limited support network
Adult with learning difficulties Communications problems
Involvement in crime/ASB
Troubled Family Risk Factors
13
Local Definition for Leics Troubled Families
Out of 23 potential risks/issues– More than 5 risks/issues = Troubled Family– Any family with an open Child Protection Plan not in the
above = Troubled Family– Add to this any family not in the above but has 2 or more
of:-• Alcohol Misuse• Drugs Misuse• Violence or abuse• Crime/ASB• Mental Health
14
Any family presenting 2-4 risks not in the TF category
= a At Risk Familye.g. at risk of becoming Troubled
15
16
NAT CEN FIP RESEARCH: Outcomes for families exiting FIP
Outcome Improvements Recorded:
Families involved in ASB A Reduction of 58% to 34%
Families involved in Crime A Reduction of 41% to 20%
Children with behavioural /truancy problems A Reduction of 53% to 28%
Risks from poor family functioning (DV, family breakdown, child protection) A Reduction of 47% to 16%
Child protection plans A Reduction of 34% to 18%
Health risks including mental, physical health and substance misuse problems A Reduction of 34%
In worklessness (ETE) A Reduction of 14% to 58% 17
Evaluation Highlighted 8 Core Features Viewed as Critical to FIP Success
1. Recruitment and retention of high quality staff who can work in an empathetic way, build trust whilst maintaining professional boundaries (the relationship with families is key)
2. Small caseloads (no more than 6 at any one time)3. Dedicated key worker who works intensively with each family in the
home & community and outside of ‘office hours’4. A whole family approach5. Consistency of key worker with family and longevity6. Having the scope to use resources creatively i.e.. personal/flexible
budget7. Using sanctions alongside support/incentives for families8. Effective multi-agency relationships/working and information sharing
18
The Design: Leicestershire’s Family Model
19
Any new model is sustainable beyond the medium term Aims to move families closer to independence from public services Model will need to be underpinned by cultural change with strong leadership
across Leicestershire Public Sector/Voluntary Sector ‘champions’ and SRO in all organisation to lead required cultural change?
Supports early/earlier intervention Builds on good, well evaluated practice Incorporates some personalised commissioning at family & locality level Workforce development a key component (multi-agency training) Robust supervision framework key Families/workers are able to access services required quickly with some priority
(with lower entry thresholds) Is able to influence commissioning for identified service gaps and policy
changes Single Family Assessment Framework Information is Shared
Family Support Model - Key Principles
20
Targeted Services
Universal Services
Specialist Services
FamilyFamily
Improved outcomesIncreased resilience, strengths &
independence
Co-located locality service:
•Permanent core team members inc. Family
Worker•P/t Co-opted team
members•Personalised family
budgets
<-Cultural
Shift -> <-Act Family->
<-Cultural Shift -> <-Act Family->
Approved Family ModelApproved Family Model
Role:
Whole family approach•Delivers direct support
•Co-ordinates other services•Outreach in home/community•Assertive intensive support
•Small caseloads
21
A. Team around the family approach with dedicated family key worker Role is outreach working in family homes and communities small caseloads and intensive approach as required by family circumstances/needs In some families may require an additional separate worker to directly support the
children Builds family capacity, resilience & recognises strengths within the family Builds self esteem, skills, relationships and aspirations
B. Co-located services in localities Local integrated core multi-agency teams Locality partnership solutions and delivery
C. Working with families for better outcomes for their families Single Family Plan (owned/developed by family with support) Honest conversations Empowering families will be key In partnership with team/key worker - with empathy but clear boundaries It will be important to work with families to agree objectives – this will require an
understanding of what their drivers / priorities are Realistic expectations on outcomes for the most long term ‘troubled’ families Access to required services key
Leicestershire’s Family Support Model
22
Needs to be everyone’s responsibility
Enablers for the Family Model
Family Feedback on the Family Model
17 Families across 2 district areas attended a number of focus groups
The findings from the original FCN insight were reinforced
• This included the importance of :
o Early years and early/earlier interventiono having a joined up whole family approach that was family led (listening to families needs,
trying to help them and not judge them) o Family designed (choice, flexibility and a language families understand) o Sustainability (to enable families to be independent of services)
o Workers who are well trained with a good awareness of the issues and challenges families face
o Quality services that meets families needs (advocacy and practical support) o Appropriate information sharing o Ensuring families do not feel any professional or social stigma when fighting for their families
needs
24
Family Feedback on the Family Model
Highlighted the importance of the following elements in a family support worker:
• the softer skills needed by staff• the ability to build a relationship, trust and mediate• not to be critical or judgemental• a consistent person• knowledge on how to get things done• authority to get things done • choice (i.e. about time in the home or community, the nature of the help)
• easily contactable or available in a crisis• sharing data amongst the team around the family• understanding the professional’s ‘language’
25
Current/Next Steps
Clarifying the National Programme Briefing & Consulting Key Stakeholders Establish Governance for the Programme Developing a Financial Budget (profile income & costs)
Impact of Government funding Impact of contributions from partners
Making appropriate links into other relevant Initiatives/Priorities i.e. Worklessness; Economic Development/Employers Engagement; Voluntary Sector Initiatives etc
Planning Implementation Delivery Model/Service, infrastructure, staffing, systems, policies,
performance framework , Information Systems, Communications Strategy etc.
26
Questions
How could Parishes contribute to the Troubled Families Programme?
What can we do to enable that support to happen?
27