transportation and growth management program … · entail analysis, evaluation of alternative...

TRANSPORTATION AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

2018 GRANT APPLICATION

APPLICATIONS DUE 4:00 PM, June 8, 2018

Note: This form must be filled out using the latest version of Adobe Acrobat or Reader. Download the latest version of Reader here: https://get.adobe.com/reader/

Download the Application, Application Packet, and Racial and Ethnic Impact Statement at: https://www.oregon.gov/LCD/TGM/Pages/Grants.aspx. Also on the web page are examples of successful TGM Applications, a list of all TGM grants to date, and help for developing a project approach and budget.

Type of Grant: Category 1 ODOT Region (1-5): Region 1

Primary Applicant Jurisdiction: City of King City

Project Title: King City TSP with Direction for Future Land Use Master Plan

Mailing Address: 15300 SW 116th Avenue

City/Zip: King City OR

Contact Person: Michael Weston

Contact Person Title: City Manager

Telephone/Email: 5036394082 [email protected]

Co-Applicants involved in the

project:

MATCH

YES NO

Summary Description of Project: This section must be completed. Do not refer to text within the application form. In no more than 1000 characters, describe the purpose of your project and the expected outcomes.

With the completion of the City’s concept plan to extend city boundaries to Roy Rogers Road, it is paramount that we begin planning a complete transportation systems plan. Due to size, ODOT waived the requirement for the city to prepare and adopt a TSP. The city’s comp. plan, most recently amended in 2002, addresses transportation to a limited extent, but falls far short of plan requirements in the Transportation Planning Rule. There is no traffic forecast or plan to identify deficiencies and address needs over the 20-year plan horizon, nor an adequate framework to ensure a safe, well-connected system for bicyclists and pedestrians as the TPR envisions. The King City TSP project will deliver a full-fledged TSP and implementing ordinances to ensure the transportation system adequately serves existing development and future growth. Issues: 1: King City Needs a Transportation System Plan to Inform Decisions; 2: King City Needs a Master Land Use Plan for URA6D

2018 TGM Grant Application

Jurisdiction: City of King City


TGM Funds Requested Local Match* Total Project Cost

Eligible Grantee Expenses

[Labor (salary plus benefits) and

Direct Expenses] $100,000.00 $100,000.00

Consultant Personal Services $226,500.00 $226,500.00

TOTAL $226,500.00 $100,000.00 $326,500.00

*This amount should be a minimum of 12 percent of the total project budget, or: $30,886.00

Type of match to be provided: A Mix

Certifications

This application was prepared by staff of the primary applicant or staff of one of the involved jurisdictions.

This application was prepared by the following compensated consultant:

Consultant Name:

Consultants may prepare the jurisdiction’s application. However, uncompensated consultants are not eligible to participate in the project itself. Consultants who are paid to prepare the application may be eligible to participate in the project. Contact Cindy Lesmeister at 503-986-4349 if you have questions.

By checking this box, I certify that City of King City supports the proposed project, has the legal authority to pledge matching funds, and has the legal authority to apply for Transportation and Growth Management funds. I further certify that matching funds are available or will be available for the proposed project. I understand that all State of Oregon rules for contracting, auditing, underwriting (where applicable), and payment will apply to this project.

Date: Jun 5, 2018




Eligibility Requirements

The following three eligibility requirements are reviewed on a pass/fail basis. Applications found to not meet each of these requirements will not be scored against the award criteria and will not be awarded a grant.

1. Clear Transportation Relationship

A proposed project must have a clear transportation relationship and produce transportation benefits. A project must entail analysis, evaluation of alternative scenarios, development of implementation measures, and public involvement that results in a transportation plan, land use plan, or other product that addresses a transportation problem, need, opportunity, or issue of local or regional importance. 1000 character limit.

Our Concept plan calls for a variety of streets, trails, and pedestrian modes of transportation to promote connectivity through internal circulation and transform King City into a vibrant 24 hour city of the 21st century. Our objective is to reduce reliance on highways and provide internal circulation and alternative modes of transportation. On the Land Use side our desire is to integrate code language that ensures a well-connected trail and transportation system that supports the city and future growth areas. The City is intent on creating a well-connected multi-model transportation system for vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians with internal access to natural areas, recreational opportunities, neighborhoods and a vibrant town center with vertically integrated mixed use areas close to future public transportation centers and routes.

2. Adoption of Products to meet Project Objectives

A proposed project must include preparation of an adoption-ready product or products that lead to a local policy decision and that directly address the project objectives, such as a transportation system plan, comprehensive plan amendment, land use plan, code amendment, implementation program, or intergovernmental agreement. Projects are expected to include adoption hearings or will be part of a larger project to be adopted. 800 character limit.

Objective: Integrate multi-model transportation; promote internal circulation; provide alternative modes of transportation; integrate code language that ensures a well-connected trail & trans. system. Inform master planning to ensure a vibrant town center with vertically integrated mixed use areas close to public transportation centers & routes. Address KC Comp. Plan, and WaCo urban area TSP. Inventory facilities, forecast needs, ID deficiencies & develop solutions. Address community concerns & desires, and audit City’s development code to address transportation per TPR Section -045. Final deliverables will include multi-modal street design standards, a list of multi-modal system improvements, and development code amendments consistent with TPR requirements.

3. Support of Local Officials

A proposed project must clearly demonstrate that local officials, both the primary applicant and any co-applicants, understand the purpose of the grant application and support the project objectives. A letter or resolution of support from the governing body of the applying jurisdiction (e.g. City Council, Board of Commissioners, or Transit Board) must be submitted with the application to meet this requirement. 400 character limit.

The City has already demonstrated support for this project by completing the City’s Concept Plan, commissioning a traffic impact study for future growth, and evaluating potential impacts on the regional transportation framework. In addition, the City has set aside additional planning funds of $100,000 to continue transportation and master planning work.




Award Criteria

Applications are scored on a range of criteria and receive up to 100 points. Projects are selected primarily based on the points scored; also considered are the grant amounts requested, the estimated amounts TGM believes may be required to complete a project, the amount of grant dollars available for award within a geographic region, and the balance of grant dollars between Category 1 and Category 2 projects. A scoring consideration is ensuring a fair distribution of grant funds to smaller or economically distressed communities.

1. Proposed project addresses a need and supports TGM objectives (up to 40 points)

The project clearly and effectively addresses a local or regional transportation or transportation-related land use issue, problem, need, or opportunity and will achieve one or more of the TGM objectives.

VISION: Our vision is to develop a Master Plan that encourages a compact, vibrant, mixed use district that integrates the urban and natural environments through a multi-modal network to create an attractive and accessible place for visitors and residents to shop, eat, live, work, learn, and play. (A) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The primary objectives and deliverables are two-fold with the first being a Land Use and Transportation System Plan and the second being to inform and develop the City’s Master Plan. This project will establish a specific strategy for policy development and future investment in the City as a way to achieve the vision for the area and region. The Master Plan will include sufficient detail to provide a basis for implementation of strategic actions, including amending local policies (comprehensive plan and zoning designations, design guidelines, and development code regulations). The Master Plan will include an analysis of existing conditions, including opportunities and constraints; a market analysis, including ROI, to determine potential types and scales of uses with recommendations to increase financial feasibility and property values (including residential, commercial, office, and institutional); an innovative public engagement plan that considers cutting-edge technology, multiple platforms, and targeted outreach; a multi-modal system analysis identifying barriers and recommendations; a consistency analysis with regional and state policies; detailed maps and illustrations graphically depicting the vision for the area, including open space design, circulation and access, and the location and scale for various uses and development; 3-D illustrations or perspective renderings of key project components; and an implementation phasing plan, which identifies areas most ripe for (re)development and actions most important to the success of the master plan. This process will also evaluate the main street/town center boundary, the Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012-0060), and Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 6; and will consider appropriate policy responses including but not limited to establishing a Multimodal Mixed-Use Area in the study area to reduce traffic generation and refinements to the main street/town center boundary. As a result of this project, the city anticipates specific actions that will remove barriers and encourage private investment within the area designated for the KC main street/town center. The specific actions will likely include new policies, opportunities for public-private partnerships, establishing development incentives, and program development to address challenges to development in and around the surrounding areas, including visibility for businesses, connectivity issues, active outdoor spaces, parcel development and parking concerns. For example, a parking management plan would include recommendations for demand management programs, new ratio standards, providing centralized and structured lots, identifying funding and partnerships opportunities, and phasing strategies such as interim active uses. Ultimately, these actions will help the City guide development to ensure a vibrant, pedestrian and transit supportive mixed-use district that integrates the urban and natural environments, to create an attractive and accessible place for visitors and residents of all ages to shop, eat, live, work, learn, and play.

(B) COLLABORATIONS: The success of the Master Plan will come in its implementation. Building a strong network of collaborators and cultivating relationships during the planning process is integral to establishing the foundation for action once the plan is completed. As described herein, the project will pursue a broad and multi-faceted engagement plan. Involvement opportunities will include an advisory committee, workshops / charrette, focus groups, visual preference surveys, and online feedback tools, and will specifically target the involvement of residents and business and property owners. Residents of the City and surrounding areas will most likely be the regular users and visitors to the main street/town center and this effort must reflect their needs and wishes for this place in order to encourage them to want to come often and spend more time here. As investors in the town center, business and property owners will call this place home and are integral to carrying out this plan once it is completed. Their contributions, along with for profit and non-profit developers, will help achieve increased activity and the desired outcomes for the area, and thus, are key collaborators. Support letters from both stakeholders and technical advisors to the development of the Master Plan concept are included with this grant application highlighting their interest and involvement in the project. Other partners will also participate in the Master Plan and provide in-kind contributions, primarily through their time commitment to the project. City representatives will work as a team to establish a holistic set of goals with realistic actions and resources to achieve them. Partner Agency representatives from ODOT, TVF&R, Washington County, City of Tigard, Tigard-Tualatin School District, Tri-Met, and Clean Water Services will provide guidance on providing the best service to future residents. Local high school and college students can assist in developing engaging online public involvement tools and participating in design opportunities for the main street/town center. The project will also work to engage nearby farmers, producers, medical professionals, winery affiliates, and tourism industry representatives in an effort create a nexus between the main street/town center and surrounding rural industries, in an effort to establish strategies to support the local economy, and draw more local businesses to the community. (C) SUPPORTED TGM OBJECTIVES: 1 Provide transportation choices to support communities with the balanced and interconnected transportation networks necessary for mobility, equity, and economic growth. 1.1 A balanced, interconnected, and safe transportation system that provides a variety of transportation options and supports land uses. 1.2 Appropriately sited, designed, and managed local, regional, and state transportation facilities and services that support the movement of goods and provide for services. 1.3 Mobility choices for under served communities and those with limited options. 1.4 Safe and convenient walking, biking, and public transportation opportunities to support a healthy, active lifestyle. Finding: Objective 1: Is clearly at the forefront of the City’s proposal. The TSP & Master Plan would consider and implement the development of a wide array of transportation modes from walking trails, bike trails, boulevards, neighborhood streets, and arterials. A focus of the overall plan will be ensuring a vibrant and successful main street that provides access to goods and services appropriately sited along future bus routes and an interconnected trail network designed to provide safe and convenient access to walking, biking, and recreational amenities. 2 Create communities composed of vibrant neighborhoods and lively centers linked by accessible transportation. 2.1 Livable towns and cities with a mix of housing types, work places, shops, schools, and parks for people of all ages, incomes and abilities. 2.2 Well-located activity centers, including schools and other government services, which are accessible to pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users. 2.3 A safe and appealing physical environment supportive of the social, cultural, and health needs of all the community residents. Finding: As mentioned previously, the City’s Vision is to create a vibrant vertically mixed use district that will create a sense of belonging in a centralized location convenient to King City Residents and surrounding areas. The City’s concept plan calls for a wide variety of housing types to address housing affordability and regional needs. The proposed transportation network will create highly connected and integrated communities with a core focus on ensuring a variety of transportation options. 3 Support economic vitality and growth by planning for land uses and the movement of people and goods. 3.1 Thriving existing neighborhoods and centers and well-planned new growth that accommodate existing and

future residents, businesses, and services. 3.2 Well-located and accessible industrial and employment centers. 3.3 Housing with access to education, jobs, and services. Finding: The project will focus on developing an innovative and guiding plan to inform decision for the City’s future growth with an eye towards integrating new and old areas of King City. Additionally, market and transportation studies should inform decisions relating to the location, size and scope of the City’s New Main Street/Town Center in the western portion of Urban Reserve Area. The Land Use and Transportation System Plan should address immediate and future land use and transportation needs within King City and the surrounding areas. As a function of the Main Street/Town Center planning efforts the City will look toward integrating housing types and densities on surrounding parcels to ensure the success of the main street/town center. These efforts will depict the type, nature and scale of housing in surrounding areas and identify the scope and nature of commercial, retail and institutional lands being proposed. Working Cooperatively with Washington County’s efforts to integrate transportation networks in urban reserve areas the City’s master planning efforts will be able to develop a refined transportation system plan that will integrate the future road network and improvements that will be necessary to accommodate the regional demands. The scope of the project considers areas within King City’s Current City Limits and URA 6D, a centrally located area with integrated infrastructure near the southwestern confluence of Beaverton, Tigard, Sherwood and King City. A main street/town center, and an established retail and service district at the center of this location would service the entire region. The main street/town center is projected to be approximately 40-60 acres and encompasses the properties southeast of the Roy Rogers-Beef Bend Intersection, within URA 6D. The area is expected to support commercial services, business & hospitality sectors, medical industry and professional offices, and other customer-oriented uses designed to meet the growing demands of the Southwestern Metro community as well as to meet the general shopping and service needs on an area-wide basis, together with multi & single family residential neighborhoods, open spaces, recreational access, bike & pedestrian trail facilities and public uses. The main street/town center will be highly visible and is expected to create a central gathering place for the community. In addition to the main street/town center concept the city is also looking to relocate City Hall and other central services such as a library and recreational center to the area and integrate those with the town center and natural areas. The site, market, and financial feasibility analysis components of this plan, conducted in partnership with the City, local property, and business owners provides a great opportunity to identify aspirational yet practical development ideas for these potentially dynamic and invigorating sites. The new main street/town center will be within walking distance to apprx 80% of the residential single & multi-family designated areas and integrated with outlying neighborhoods through a series of multi-modal connections, green spaces, and integrated transportation networks. The City has experienced robust development over the past 10 years and have maximized potential densities within current city limits and urban growth boundaries. As such, this project will also study “influence areas,” those areas adjacent to the Main Street/Town Center that may be impacted by activity in the Main Street/Town Center and help determine market potential and complimentary development to target for the Main Street/Town Center. 4 Save public and private costs with compact land uses and well-connected transportation patterns. 4.1 Urban growth accommodated within existing communities, thus minimizing, delaying, or providing an alternative to an urban growth boundary expansion. 4.2 Future transportation needs accommodated within the existing or improved system, thus minimizing, delaying, or providing an alternative to constructing additional major infrastructure projects. Finding: King City currently has approximately 1.5 acres of unconstrained buildable land which is expected to develop within the year. The City has submitted an elaborate Concept Plan in accordance with Metro’s Title 11 framework and completed a substantial amount of the background work required as a function of a Master Plan. The City’s concept plan, will be used as a foundation for future planning in the expansion area; however this plan takes into consideration all of King City’s transportation network and land uses and evaluates their effectiveness and constraints and ultimately proposes improvement to accommodate the future growth anticipated in the region. Preliminary studies indicate that transportation improvements will be necessary at a number of key intersections throughout the City. The land use and transportation system plans will inform decisions related to improvements, costs, and financial feasibility in addition to analyzing market variables that ensure a vibrant well connected community. In addition to vehicular transportation our City has taken a proactive approach toward active

transportation and seeks as a function of this project to develop a trails master plan that incorporates bicycle and pedestrian facilities that interconnect to provide an efficient multi-modal transportation network 5 Promote environmental stewardship through sustainable land use and transportation planning. 5.1 Transportation systems and land use patterns that protect valuable natural resources, promote energy efficiency, and reduce emissions of air pollution and greenhouse gases. Finding: With a density of 2666 units per square mile, King City’s density surpasses even Portland rivaling any city in the state and has continually demonstrated that it is a steward of the environment by consistently promoting sustainable land use and transportation planning. The City’s concept plan identifies approximately 318 acres of unconstrained developable land within the City’s urban Reserve Area, which is comprised of approximately 528 acres overall. A significant amount, approximately 200 acres, of the reserve area is identified for natural resource preservation or environmentally sensitive areas. King City has consistently sought out graceful transitions with resource and wildlife areas. To the south of the City lies the Tualatin River and Wildlife refuge. These natural areas are key recreational facilities for the region and King City and are considered prominent central features of our concept plan. Elaborate trail networks along the Tualatin River and between neighborhoods and resource areas allows residents to witness a delicate balance between necessitated growth and protection of wildlife areas.

2. Proposed project is timely and urgent (up to 25 points)

The application demonstrates timeliness and urgency. The project is needed now to:address pressing local transportation and land use issues;make amendments to local plans or regulations necessitated by changes in federal regulations, state requirements, or regional plans;make amendments to local plans or regulations necessitated by changes that were not anticipated in previous plans including growth or lack of growth, changes in land use patterns, or changes in available fundingbuild on, complement, or take a necessary step toward completing or implementing other high priority community initiatives, including supporting a Governor's Regional Solutions team priority; orresolve transportation- or land use-related issues affecting the project readiness of local, regional, or state transportation projects for which funding is expected to be obligated within the near future.

(A) URGENCY AND TIMELINESS: This is an urgent matter for King City because the City is virtually out of buildable land in the middle of a regional housing crisis. The City has been developing a Concept Plan for the past two years and has submitted the plan to Metro for evaluation. The next logical step in our progression is to begin our Transportation and Master Planning work and not lose the momentum and involvement the City has gained through the Concept Planning Process. Additionally, past development on surrounding lands have had adverse impacts on our natural areas, streams, and tributaries throughout the urban reserve area. Brining the area into the City’s UGB will allow the City to address the erosion issues through regional stormwater management facilities; thereby, cleaning up and restoring much of the damage caused by previous unchecked growth. (B) THE PROJECT IS NEEDED NOW TO: (1) Create Clear Development Outcomes: the planning activities described herein will identify barriers and articulate a set of actions to encourage catalytic investments and develop a more complete and vibrant City. The market analysis and the identification of opportunities and constraints will identify key areas for investment. The project will engage key property owners and businesses in the community to participate and stimulate interest, build ideas and create ownership of actions identified in the plan. Opportunities for public-private partnerships and program development will be identified to highlight what the city can do to support opportunity sites with catalytic potential. The area is currently well-served by infrastructure, including the transportation network, showing a regional level of commitment and investment already made in the area. The Main Street/Town Center will be the focal point of dozens of businesses, public parks and green ways, institutional uses, and homes; so there should be support to build on and plenty of opportunities to develop. Existing examples of urban form development in nearby areas show these projects are possible, but the Master Plan can identify what more can be done to increase the feasibility of these development types. Adjacent areas are developing and demand in the area is extremely high. The compatibility and design of a transition to a Main Street/Town Center will continue to be a priority. With the rising demand in King City and a population growing at record rates, there is a need to increase the City’s growth

potential; by completing the Master Plan in the near term. Current conditions essentially prohibit the city from accommodating the growth demands. With less than 1.5 acres of unconstrained buildable land within City limits, of which an application has already been reviewed; it is obvious that the City must not prolong the inevitable and begin planning their future in order to keep up with service demands. The City is committed to this project, and has successfully implemented past community and development projects. King City is a full-service city providing integrated infrastructure and urban services to the community, which makes it easy to align services to accomplish the goals of the project - development and maintenance of roads, trails, and parks, water, wastewater, development permitting, law enforcement, Fire and Rescue via TVFR and transit via tri-met and local provider options. (2) To Advance and Complement Regional Goals and Policies: The proposed grant will benefit the region in achieving regional development goals by: (1)Master planning to increase activity in the town center, making it a vibrant place for the people who live and work there, and services the broader community; (2) Using the Master Plan to achieve the vision for the area will increase the economic prosperity of the city, which will help the city better serve its residents. Creating a more vibrant focal point in the community will also maintain and attract more employers. (3) The Master Plan will look at the multimodal network serving the town center, ensuring safe and reliable transportation choices; improved bicycle and pedestrian facilities within the center and transportation demand management techniques (TDM) will be evaluated. (4/5) In setting the stage for a more complete community, and focusing on improved multi-modal connectivity, reduced parking, and TDM opportunities, the strategies and actions identified by the plan can help reduce VMT and associated GHGs. Similarly, focusing on enhanced design in the center can provide more green infrastructure and urban canopy, which can reduce energy and water use and improve the quality of stormwater runoff. (6) Finally, the Master Plan can support local and regional equity goals by engaging underserved groups in the project and identifying opportunities to ensure these populations experience the benefits envisioned by the plan. For example, working with minority-owned businesses in the town center can help identify strategies for supporting their entrepreneurial success and extending this opportunity to other businesses. Similarly, working with developers and low income service providers to provide a variety of housing types can help establish policies and incentives for ensuring affordable housing opportunities are built in the center with access to existing infrastructure, transit, and services. (3) Regional Significance: The project is designed to incorporate many of the Metro regional goals and recognizing the area’s significance as a regional hub for the surrounding residential areas is paramount in the evaluation and development of this master plan. Establishing the importance of this area as a principal center of urban life in the region is a primary objective of the City’s, and illustrates the regional significance of this project. Our preliminary market studies indicate that not only is a regional town center warranted in this area, but that a regional town center would thrive and serve a much larger area and population outside of just King City. The project will perform an assessment of the town center (analyzing physical and market conditions, physical and regulatory barriers, the development code, and existing and potential incentives to encourage mixed use pedestrian-friendly and transit supportive development); and will result in the adoption of a plan that outlines actions and investments, including revisions to land use regulations (to support a mix and intensity of uses) and strategies to increase non-SOV mode share such as transportation system designs, system management and demand management plans, and a parking management program. In Addition this plan will lay out the framework of how the City can develop a sustainable Main Street/Town Center that will help to realize the community plans and goals, accommodate projected populations, housing needs, and provide employment opportunities, and/or maximize proposed and/or existing community assets such as public transit, parks, natural features, and cultural districts.

3. Proposed project approach is reasonable (up to 20 points)

The application demonstrates a clear approach to achieving the expected outcome and results in consideration for adoption. Where substantial coordination with other local, regional, and state planning efforts occurs (or will need to occur), the mechanisms and responsibilities for the coordination are clear.

(A) MILESTONES & DELIVERABLES: M1: Execution of the IGA for the King City Master Plan If awarded the Transportation and Growth Management Grant for the King City Transportation System and Land Use Plan to inform the Master Plan, King City’s project manager will work with Metro staff to execute an IGA for the project. Minimal time is billed for

this task in the budget. M2: Project kick-off This milestone consists of both Tasks 1 and 2, which will include selecting a consultant to provide professional services to the project and the foundational activities to kick-off the project. King City Staff will work with TGM staff to draft a RFP, review proposals, select a consultant team, and establish a scope of work with the consultant consistent with the scope of work established in the executed IGA with TGM. Once established, the project team (staff + consultants) will work together to establish a detailed project schedule and draft public involvement plan, which is envisioned to be innovative, taking advantage of cutting-edge technology, using multiple platforms, and complimenting with targeted outreach. Public involvement will rely heavily on individual and small-group meetings, social media, and surveys, both online and at numerous community events, workshops, a design charrette, and guidance from the Planning Commission, and City Council. During this task, the consultant (and/or local technology students) will also set up the decided upon public involvement tools and launch them to the public. A task force or advisory committee will also be established during this first phase and briefings provided to the Planning Commission and City Council. M3: Workshop 1: opportunities During Task 3, the consultant will focus on analyzing existing conditions in the existing City Limits and Urban Reserve Area and present this information at a public workshop (Milestone 3) to identify the key opportunities that will form the basis of the goals and strategies for the Land Use and Transportation Plan. This work will include an analysis of existing conditions, including opportunities and constraints; a market analysis to determine potential types and scales of uses; and a multi-modal system analysis identifying barriers and recommendations. This information will be presented to the established task force/committee as well as the Planning Commission and City Council in preparation for the public workshop. Materials will be prepared for the workshop and afterward, a summary describing the key opportunities will be drafted. M4: Establish goals for the Main Street/Town Center Milestone 4 is focused on establishing goals for the Main Street/Town Center. To get there, the project team will complete Task 4 by pulling together information from the public workshop on opportunities, engaging key stakeholders in the Main Street/Town Center area and broader community, and drafting goals and objectives. The draft goals will be reviewed with the project task force/committee, Planning Commission and City Council as well as with the public by use of the public involvement tools and online forums. This input and feedback will be used to refine and finalize goals for the Main Street/Town Center Area. M5: Draft Land Use and Transportation System Plan With the goals established and an inventory of key opportunities and constraints, the consultant team, in partnerships with city staff, will develop a land use and transportation plan (Task 5), graphically depicting the vision for the area, including open space design, circulation and access, and the location and scale for various uses and development including parks and open spaces. They will also complete a ROI feasibility analysis to determine financial feasibility of desired development types and an initial traffic and multi-modal trip rate analysis based on the land use plan. Final deliverables will include multi-modal street design standards, a list of multi-modal system improvements, and land use and development code amendments consistent with TPR requirements. The draft plan will be reviewed with the project task force/committee, Planning Commission and City Council and refinements integrated in preparation for the Community Design Charrette. M6: Community Design Charrette To complete Task 5 of the project, the City and consultant team will host a design charrette with the community to discuss how the established goals and opportunities might be realized on the ground; reviewing with them the initial draft land use plan. The focus will be on how to use design to achieve the shared vision for the new Main Street/Town Center. Working groups and work sessions will engage stakeholders in refining elements of the land use plan and generating ideas for implementation and how to accomplish the vision. The project team will present maps and illustrations, which may include 3-D illustrations or perspective renderings of key project components, and hopefully utilize real-time software programs to reflect the input and ideas gathered during the Charrette. The Charrette format will be refined based on the consultant team selected, but will be a critical factor in gathering input from the community and key stakeholders in shaping the recommendations of the Master Plan. A summary of the activities and results of the Community Design Charrette will be provided. M7: Draft Master Plan The results of the Community Design Charrette will be used to update the land use plan, traffic and multi-modal trip analysis, financial feasibility analysis, and open space, green canopy, circulation and access components of the plan.

Initial draft strategies and actions for implementation will also be completed as part of this task including recommendations to increase financial feasibility and property values for various uses identified in the plan (e.g. residential, commercial, office, and institutional). It will also outline specific actions that will remove barriers and encourage private investment in the Main Street/Town Center. The specific actions will likely include new policies, opportunities for public private partnerships, establishing development incentives, and program development to address challenges in the Main Street/Town Center. The consultant will review Metro’s Community Investment Toolkit and other national best practices in identifying the most appropriate strategies and actions. The draft Master Plan will be reviewed with the project task force/committee, Planning Commission and City Council in preparation for a public workshop focused on the Master Plan. All of these activities are associated with project Task 6 to achieve Milestone 7: A Draft Master Plan including: Land Use Plan, Transportation System Plan, Parks and Natural Resources including trail development and access, Finance Plan with System Development Charges. M8: Workshop 2: Master Plan To complete Task 6 of the project, the City and consultant team will host a public workshop focused on refining the Master Plan. Updated maps and visualizations will be provided as well as the ideas and proposed actions for implementing this Master Plan. Materials will be prepared for the workshop and afterward, a summary drafted describing the input received. The draft Master Plan will also be shared through the public involvement tools and online forums established at the beginning of the project and outlined in the public involvement plan. This input and feedback will be used to refine and finalize the Main Street/Town Center Master Plan and implementation plan. M9: Adopt Master Plan The final milestone for this project is adopting the Main Street/Town Center Master Plan. This includes both Tasks 7 and 8: completing a state, regional, and local consistency analysis as well as a final draft Master Plan and policy package. This process will evaluate the main street/town center boundary, the Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660- 012-0060), and Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 6; and will consider appropriate policy responses including but not limited to establishing a Multimodal Mixed-Use Area in the study area to reduce traffic generation and refinements to the main street/town center boundary. Any identified comprehensive plan map and development code amendments needed to support the Master Plan will also be drafted. A final Master Plan document will be prepared with analyses and key documents described in Tasks 1-6, detailed maps and illustrations of key project components, and an implementation phasing plan, which identifies areas most ripe for (re)development and actions most important to the success of the master plan. City staff will package these documents for review and recommendation by the Planning Commission and adoption by the City Council. B) PROJECT MANAGEMENT: Michael Weston King City - City Manager, in coordination with Keith Liden the City Planner will be the project managers and Metro’s main point of contact for the duration of the project. The skills needed to complete the King City Town Center Master Plan will involve an array of staff at the City as well as the professional services of a consultant team. The Grant funds are proposed to fund consultant expense and King City Staff time needed to complete the scope of work outlined in the line item budget. The City will contribute up to $80,000 from the General Fund and Long Range Planning Fund, which has been committed to being spent on the City’s URA 6D Master Planning efforts. In addition, the City will provide in-kind contributions to cover the cost of City staff serving in a support role to the project (legal, GIS, communications, administrative, and finance). (C) COST ASSUMPTIONS: This project’s scope of work is similar to the level of work and budget needed for the City’s recent Concept Planning Project; while an in-depth study, design and cost estimating of infrastructure was already performed this effort does need more extensive public outreach and relationship-building, additional visualization and urban design services, and a financial feasibility analysis for different development types. • This scope of work and budget is similar to other master planning efforts. • Personnel cost for the City use an hourly rate of $150 / hour, which represents the project manager’s billable rate which is comprised of salary plus benefits plus any overhead expenses incurred by the City. While other personnel will contribute to the project (at both higher and lower hourly rates), the majority of hours will be spent by the project manager. • Other personnel will include support staff for public outreach, events, and public hearings; directors’ review of key deliverables and at hearings / events; and subject area expertise on the advisory committee and for review of specific deliverables and elements of the plan (e.g. civil engineer to review traffic analysis and connectivity recommendations, and public communications will review content and messaging of online public involvement

tools) • Personnel cost for the consultant was estimated based on similar scopes of work

4. Proposed project has community support (up to 5 points)

The application demonstrates that there is local support for the project objectives, a commitment to participate, and a desire to implement the expected outcome.

This is a well-supported project and the City Council is ready to take action on a strategy for policy development and future investment in the area. With specific regulatory changes resulting from the project, barriers can be removed and the stage set for desired development. Engaging property owners, developers and businesses in the project will also prepare them to take action once the plan is in place. A dynamic community engagement effort, along with visualizations of potential projects and positive financial returns, will also help garner support and build interest, and therefore investment, in the area and the Master plan.

List attached letters of support on Application Checklist.

5. Proposed project sponsor readiness and capacity (up to 10 points)

The application demonstrates that the local government is ready and able to begin the project within the TGM timetable and that there is local commitment and capability to manage the project considering the complexity of the project, the size of the jurisdiction, and performance on previous TGM projects. Where substantial coordination with other local, regional, and state planning efforts will need to occur, all of the partners are ready and able to begin the project within the TGM timetable.

Likelihood of full implementation: A Master Plan with the extensive list of project elements and engagement efforts described in this project description will require significant resources. As such, the City is prepared to exceed the required 12% match and provide funding at 30% of the estimated project costs plus in kind overages. These planning efforts need to be completed prior to development in the region. Any work completed in this phase of planning work will further augment and enhance the development efforts in the region and provide significant technical resources for development. The City is committed to this concept as well as the major stakeholders and property owners, and whether it is 1 or 2 years this project will reach full implementation within the near future. Capacity of applicant: The skills needed to complete the elements of the master plan include: planning, urban design, transportation engineering and modeling, development economics, public involvement, social media and visualization techniques with legal, GIS, natural resources, government relations/communications, administrative and finance support. Please see the budget narrative for the balance between staff and consultant services to complete the various tasks of the project. Jurisdictional Track Record and Governing body: The City Council is the governing body responsible for adopting a Master Plan for the Main Street/Town Center and any accompanying amendments to comprehensive plan and zoning designations, design guidelines, and development code regulations. The City Council will adopt these provisions by local ordinance. Our City Council is currently the most diverse city council in the state of Oregon and possibly one of the most functional. The entire Council is behind this effort in addition to the majority of our residents. King City has long been a participating, but quite member of the Regional Council. For over 50 years King City has quietly existed with little to no modifications to our boundaries, but there has been an awakening within King City and a resurgence of progressive thought that has driven our desires to contribute to the regional aspirations and help address some of the issues relating to diversity, our economy and economic opportunities, equitable housing and a variety of housing types, and finally it is our desire to create a regionally significant Main Street/Town Center that can be a galvanizing feature for our community.

6. Up to 10 Bonus Points: Proposed project is innovative

The application demonstrates that the project will be innovative in its subject matter, approach, or expected outcomes. For example, the project will use health impact assessments or economic impact analysis as part of the evaluation of transportation alternatives or will include an innovative multimodal analysis. DO NOT answer criterion #6 separately. Scores will award points based on the entirety of the application. By

the nature of this criterion, most projects will not receive any points.

2018 TGM Grant Application Checklist



Application materials must include in separate files:

Grant Application form (12 pages max, including Application Checklist)

Supplemental Materials:

Project area map

Resolution or letter of support from governing body of applying jurisdiction(s) (eligibility criterion #3)

Optional additional letters of support from stakeholders (award criterion #4)

List attached letters of support:

1. King City Land Use & Transportation Concept Map

2. R2018-11 A Resolution in Support of TGM Grant Application

3. 20170628 Metropolitan Land Group Master Planning Support Letter

4. 20170629 Tigard Support Letter to Master Plan

5. 20170628 Washington County Letter of Support to Master Plan

6. 20170628 Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Letter of Support to Master Plan

7.

8.

Racial and Ethnic Impact Statement

Submit the grant application and all supplemental materials by emailing as email attachments to

[email protected].

If your materials exceed 9 MB, divide them into two emails. Put the jurisdiction name and project name in the subject line, along with 1 of 2 and 2 of 2. Request a Read Receipt if you want confirmation that your application has been received. If you encounter any issues with the submittal process, contact:

Rebecca Coffelt, Planning Section Web Coordinator [email protected], 503-986-4254

0 450 900 1,350225Feet

Land Use DesignationLEGEND

Proposed Neighborhood Park

l

ll

ll

l

Open Space (OS)Mixed Use/Town Center (MU-TC)

Low Density Residential(LDR)

Medium Density Residential (MDR)

Tualatin

SW CAPULET LN

SW FISCHER RD

Medium Density Residential -Institutional (MDR-INST)

River

l

Potential RegionalStormwater Facility

1 in = 450 ft

SS

S

SProposed Community Parkl

##

!! !! !! !! Proposed River Trail Medium Density Res.-Low Density Res. (MDR-LDR)

NeighborhoodMixed Used (NMU)

Proposed City Boundary Proposed Collector

Proposed Green Boulevard

Proposed Local Route

Proposed Neighborhood Route

Roadway ClassificationKing City Urban Reserve Area 6D - Concept Land Use Designations & Roadway Classifications

Urban Reserve Area 6DBounday

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

1. CLEAR TRANSPORTATION RELATIONSHIP A proposed project must have a clear transportation relationship and produce transportation benefits. A project must entail

analysis, evaluation of alternative scenarios, development of implementation measures, and public involvement that results in a

transportation plan, land use plan, or other product that addresses a transportation problem, need, opportunity, or issue of

local or regional importance. (1000 Character Limit)

Our Concept plan calls for a variety of streets, trails, and pedestrian modes of transportation to promote internal circulation

and transform King City into a vibrant 24 hour city of the 21st century. Our objective is to reduce reliance on highways and

provide internal circulation and alternative modes of transportation. On the Land Use side we want to integrate code language

that ensures a well-connected trail and transportation system that supports the city and future growth areas. The City is intent

on creating a well-connected multi-model transportation system for vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians with internal access to

neighborhoods and a vibrant town center with vertically integrated mixed use areas close to future public transportation

centers and routes.

2. ADOPTION OF PRODUCTS TO MEET PROJECT OBJECTIVES A proposed project must include preparation of an adoption-ready product or products that lead to a local policy decision and

that directly address the project objectives, such as a transportation system plan, comprehensive plan amendment, and land

use plan, code amendment, implementation program, or intergovernmental agreement. Projects are expected to include

adoption hearings or will be part of a larger project to be adopted (800 Character Limit)

Objective: Integrate multi-model transportation; promote internal circulation; provide alternative modes of transportation;

integrate code language that ensures a well-connected trail & trans. system. Inform master planning to ensure a vibrant town

center with vertically integrated mixed use areas close to public transportation centers & routes. Address KC Comp. Plan, and

WaCo urban area TSP. Inventory facilities, forecast needs, ID deficiencies & develop solutions. Address community concerns

& desires, and audit City’s development code to address transportation per TPR Section -045. Final deliverables will include

multi-modal street design standards, a list of multi-modal system improvements, and development code amendments

consistent with TPR requirements.

3. SUPPORT OF LOCAL OFFICIALS A proposed project must clearly demonstrate that local officials, both the primary applicant and any co-applicants, understand

the purpose of the grant application and support the project objectives. A letter or resolution of support from the governing

body of the applying jurisdiction (e.g. City Council, Board of Commissioners, or Transit Board) must be submitted with the

application to meet this requirement. (400 Character Limit).

The City has already demonstrated support for this project by completing the City’s Concept Plan, commissioning a traffic

impact study for future growth, and evaluating potential impacts on the regional transportation framework. In addition, the

City has set aside additional planning funds of $100,000 to continue transportation and master planning work.

AWARD CRITERIA

1. PROPOSED PROJECT ADDRESSES A NEED AND SUPPORTS TGM OBJECTIVES The project clearly and effectively addresses a local or regional transportation or transportation-related land use issue,

problem, need, or opportunity and will achieve one or more of the TGM objectives. (Up to 40 Points)

VISION:

Our vision is to develop a Master Plan that encourages a compact, vibrant, mixed use district that integrates the urban and natural environments through a multi-modal network to create an attractive and accessible place for visitors and residents to shop, eat, live, work, learn, and play.

(A) PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The primary objectives and deliverables are two-fold with the first being a Land Use and Transportation System Plan and the second being to inform and develop the City’s Master Plan. This project will establish a specific strategy for policy development and future investment in the City as a way to achieve the vision for the area and region. The Master Plan will

include sufficient detail to provide a basis for implementation of strategic actions, including amending local policies (comprehensive plan and zoning designations, design guidelines, and development code regulations).

The Master Plan will include an analysis of existing conditions, including opportunities and constraints; a market analysis, including ROI, to determine potential types and scales of uses with recommendations to increase financial feasibility and property values (including residential, commercial, office, and institutional); an innovative public engagement plan that considers cutting-edge technology, multiple platforms, and targeted outreach; a multi-modal system analysis identifying barriers and recommendations; a consistency analysis with regional and state policies; detailed maps and illustrations graphically depicting the vision for the area, including open space design, circulation and access, and the location and scale for various uses and development; 3-D illustrations or perspective renderings of key project components; and an implementation phasing plan, which identifies areas most ripe for (re)development and actions most important to the success of the master plan.

This process will also evaluate the main street/town center boundary, the Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012-0060), and Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 6; and will consider appropriate policy responses including but not limited to establishing a Multimodal Mixed-Use Area in the study area to reduce traffic generation and refinements to the main street/town center boundary.

As a result of this project, the city anticipates specific actions that will remove barriers and encourage private investment

within the area designated for the King City Main Street/Town Center. The specific actions will likely include new policies,

opportunities for public-private partnerships, establishing development incentives, and program development to address

challenges to development in and around the surrounding areas, including visibility for businesses, connectivity issues, active

outdoor spaces, parcel development and parking concerns. For example, a parking management plan would include

recommendations for demand management programs, new ratio standards, providing centralized and structured lots,

identifying funding and partnerships opportunities, and phasing strategies such as interim active uses.

Ultimately, these actions will help the City guide development to ensure a vibrant, pedestrian and transit supportive mixed-use

district that integrates the urban and natural environments, to create an attractive and accessible place for visitors and residents

of all ages to shop, eat, live, work, learn, and play.

(B) COLLABORATIONS:

The success of the Master Plan will come in its implementation. Building a strong network of collaborators and cultivating

relationships during the planning process is integral to establishing the foundation for action once the plan is completed. As

described herein, the project will pursue a broad and multi-faceted engagement plan. Involvement opportunities will include

an advisory committee, workshops / charrette, focus groups, visual preference surveys, and online feedback tools, and will

specifically target the involvement of residents and business and property owners. Residents of the City and surrounding areas

will most likely be the regular users and visitors to the Main Street/Town Center and this effort must reflect their needs and

wishes for this place in order to encourage them to want to come often and spend more time here.

As investors in the Town Center, business and property owners will call this place home and are integral to carrying out this

plan once it is completed. Their contributions, along with for profit and non-profit developers, will help achieve increased

activity and the desired outcomes for the Main Street/Town Center, and thus, are key collaborators. Support letters from both

stakeholders and technical advisors to the development of the Master Plan concept are included with this grant application

highlighting their interest and involvement in the project. Other partners will also participate in the Master Plan and provide

in-kind contributions, primarily through their time commitment to the project. City representatives will work as a team to

establish a holistic set of goals with realistic actions and resources to achieve them. Partner Agency representatives from

ODOT, TVF&R, Washington County, City of Tigard, Tigard-Tualatin School District, Tri-Met, and Clean Water Services will

provide guidance on providing the best service to future residents. Local high school and college students can assist in

developing engaging online public involvement tools and participating in design opportunities for the Main Street/Town

Center. The project will also work to engage nearby farmers, producers, medical professionals, winery affiliates, and tourism

industry representatives in an effort create a nexus between the Main Street/Town Center and surrounding rural industries,

establish strategies to support the local economy, and grow more local businesses to the community.

(C) SUPPORTED TGM OBJECTIVES:

1 Provide transportation choices to support communities with the balanced and interconnected transportation networks necessary for mobility, equity, and economic growth.

1.1 A balanced, interconnected, and safe transportation system that provides a variety of transportation options and supports land uses.

1.2 Appropriately sited, designed, and managed local, regional, and state transportation facilities and services that support the movement of goods and provide for services.

1.3 Mobility choices for underserved communities and those with limited options. 1.4 Safe and convenient walking, biking, and public transportation opportunities to support a healthy, active lifestyle.

Finding: Objective 1: Is clearly at the forefront of the City’s proposal. The TSP & Master Plan would consider and implement the development of a wide array of transportation modes from walking trails, bike trails, boulevards, neighborhood streets, and arterials. A focus of the overall plan will be ensuring a vibrant and successful main street that provides access to goods and services appropriately sited along future bus routes and an interconnected trail network designed to provide safe and convenient access to walking, biking, and recreational amenities.

2 Create communities composed of vibrant neighborhoods and lively centers linked by accessible transportation. 2.1 Livable towns and cities with a mix of housing types, work places, shops, schools, and parks for people of all ages,

incomes and abilities. 2.2 Well-located activity centers, including schools and other government services, which are accessible to pedestrians,

bicyclists, and transit users. 2.3 A safe and appealing physical environment supportive of the social, cultural, and health needs of all the

community residents.

Finding: As mentioned previously, the City’s Vision is to create a vibrant vertically mixed use district that will create a sense of belonging in a centralized location convenient to King City Residents and surrounding areas. The City’s concept plan calls for a wide variety of housing types to address housing affordability and regional needs. The proposed transportation network will create highly connected and integrated communities with a core focus on ensuring a variety of transportation options.

3 Support economic vitality and growth by planning for land uses and the movement of people and goods. 3.1 Thriving existing neighborhoods and centers and well-planned new growth that accommodate existing and future residents, businesses, and services. 3.2 Well-located and accessible industrial and employment centers. 3.3 Housing with access to education, jobs, and services.

Finding:

The project will focus on developing an innovative and guiding plan to inform decision for the City’s future growth with an

eye towards integrating new and old areas of King City. Additionally, market and transportation studies should inform

decisions relating to the location, size and scope of the City’s New Main Street/Town Center in the western portion of Urban

Reserve Area. The Land Use and Transportation System Plan should address immediate and future land use and

transportation needs within King City and the surrounding areas. As a function of the Main Street/Town Center planning

efforts the City will look toward integrating housing types and densities on surrounding parcels to ensure the success of the

main street/town center. These efforts will depict the type, nature and scale of housing in surrounding areas and identify the

scope and nature of commercial, retail and institutional lands being proposed. Working Cooperatively with Washington

County’s efforts to integrate transportation networks in urban reserve areas the City’s master planning efforts will be able to

develop a refined transportation system plan that will integrate the future road network and improvements that will be

necessary to accommodate the regional demands.

The scope of the project considers areas within King City’s Current City Limits and URA 6D, a centrally located area with

integrated infrastructure near the southwestern confluence of Beaverton, Tigard, Sherwood and King City. A main

street/town center, and an established retail and service district at the center of this location would service the entire region.

The main street/town center is projected to be approximately 40-60 acres and encompasses the properties southeast of the

Roy Rogers-Beef Bend Intersection, within URA 6D. The area is expected to support commercial services, business &

hospitality sectors, medical industry and professional offices, and other customer-oriented uses designed to meet the growing

demands of the Southwestern Metro community as well as to meet the general shopping and service needs on an area-wide

basis, together with multi & single family residential neighborhoods, open spaces, recreational access, bike & pedestrian trail

facilities and public uses.

The main street/town center will be highly visible and is expected to create a central gathering place for the community. In

addition to the main street/town center concept the city is also looking to relocate City Hall and other central services such as

a library and recreational center to the area and integrate those with the town center and natural areas. The site, market, and

financial feasibility analysis components of this plan, conducted in partnership with the City, local property, and business

owners provides a great opportunity to identify aspirational yet practical development ideas for these potentially dynamic and

invigorating sites.

The new Main Street/Town Center will be within walking distance to ≃80% of the residential single & multifamily designated

areas and integrated with outlying neighborhoods through a series of multimodal connections, green spaces and integrated

transportation networks.

The City has experienced robust development over the past 10 years and have maximized potential densities within current

city limits and urban growth boundaries. As such, this project will also study “influence areas,” those areas adjacent to the

Main Street/Town Center that may be impacted by activity in the Main Street/Town Center and help determine market

potential and complimentary development to target for the Main Street/Town Center.

4 Save public and private costs with compact land uses and well-connected transportation patterns. 4.1 Urban growth accommodated within existing communities, thus minimizing, delaying, or providing an alternative to an urban growth boundary expansion. 4.2 Future transportation needs accommodated within the existing or improved system, thus minimizing, delaying, or providing an alternative to constructing additional major infrastructure projects.

Finding: King City currently has approximately 1.5 acres of unconstrained buildable land which is expected to develop within the year. The City has submitted an elaborate Concept Plan in accordance with Metro’s Title 11 framework and completed a substantial amount of the background work required as a function of a Master Plan. The City’s concept plan, will be used as a foundation for future planning in the expansion area; however this plan takes into consideration all of King City’s transportation network and land uses and evaluates their effectiveness and constraints and ultimately proposes improvement to accommodate the future growth anticipated in the region. Preliminary studies indicate that transportation improvements will be necessary at a number of key intersections throughout the City. The land use and transportation system plans will inform decisions related to improvements, costs, and financial feasibility in addition to analyzing market variables that ensure a vibrant well connected community. In addition to vehicular transportation our City has taken a proactive approach toward active transportation and seeks as a function of this project to develop a trails master plan that incorporates bicycle and pedestrian facilities that interconnect to provide an efficient multi-modal transportation network

5 Promote environmental stewardship through sustainable land use and transportation planning. 5.1 Transportation systems and land use patterns that protect valuable natural resources, promote energy efficiency, and reduce emissions of air pollution and greenhouse gases.

Finding: With a density of 2666 units per square mile, King City’s density surpasses even Portland rivaling any city in the state and has continually demonstrated that it is a steward of the environment by consistently promoting sustainable land use and transportation planning. The City’s concept plan identifies approximately 318 acres of unconstrained developable land within the City’s urban Reserve Area, which is comprised of approximately 528 acres overall. A significant amount, approximately 200 acres, of the reserve area is identified for natural resource preservation or environmentally sensitive areas. King City has consistently sought out graceful transitions with resource and wildlife areas. To the south of the City lies the Tualatin River and Wildlife refuge. These natural areas are key recreational facilities for the region and King City and are considered prominent central features of our concept plan. Elaborate trail networks along the Tualatin River and between neighborhoods and resource areas allows residents to witness a delicate balance between necessitated growth and protection of wildlife areas.

2. PROPOSED PROJECT IS TIMELY AND URGENT The application demonstrates timeliness and urgency. The project is needed now to address pressing local transportation and

land use issues; make amendments to local plans or regulations necessitated by changes that were not anticipated in previous

plans including growth or lack of growth, changes in land use patterns, or changes in available funding, build on, complement,

or take a necessary step toward completing or implementing other high priority community initiatives, including supporting a

Governor’s Regional Solutions team priority; or resolve transportation, or land use related issues affecting the project

readiness or local, regional, or state transportation projects for which funding is expected to be obligated within the near

future. (Up to 25 Points)

(A) URGENCY AND TIMELINESS:

This is an urgent matter for King City because the City is virtually out of buildable land in the middle of a regional housing

crisis. The City has been developing a Concept Plan for the past two years and has submitted the plan to Metro for evaluation.

The next logical step in our progression is to begin our Transportation and Master Planning work and not lose the momentum

and involvement the City has gained through the Concept Planning Process. Additionally, past development on surrounding

lands have had adverse impacts on our natural areas, streams, and tributaries throughout the urban reserve area. Brining the

area into the City’s UGB will allow the City to address the erosion issues through regional stormwater management facilities;

thereby, cleaning up and restoring much of the damage caused by previous unchecked growth.

(B) THE PROJECT IS NEEDED NOW TO:

(1) Create Clear Development Outcomes: the planning activities described herein will identify barriers and articulate a set

of actions to encourage catalytic investments and develop a more complete and vibrant City. The market analysis and the

identification of opportunities and constraints will identify key areas for investment. The project will engage key property

owners and businesses in the community to participate and stimulate interest, build ideas and create ownership of actions

identified in the plan. Opportunities for public-private partnerships and program development will be identified to highlight

what the city can do to support opportunity sites with catalytic potential.

The area is currently well-served by infrastructure, including the transportation network, showing a regional level of

commitment and investment already made in the area. The Main Street/Town Center will be the focal point of dozens of

businesses, public parks and green ways, institutional uses, and homes; so there should be support to build on and plenty of

opportunities to develop. Existing examples of urban form development in nearby areas show these projects are possible, but

the Master Plan can identify what more can be done to increase the feasibility of these development types. Adjacent areas are

developing and demand in the area is extremely high. The compatibility and design of a transition to a Main Street/Town

Center will continue to be a priority. With the rising demand in King City and a population growing at record rates, there is a

need to increase the City’s growth potential; by completing the Master Plan in the near term. Current conditions essentially

prohibit the city from accommodating the growth demands. With less than 1.5 acres of unconstrained buildable land within

City limits, of which an application has already been reviewed; it is obvious that the City must not prolong the inevitable and

begin planning their future in order to keep up with service demands. The City is committed to this project, and has

successfully implemented past community and development projects.

King City is a full-service city providing integrated infrastructure and urban services to the community, which makes it easy to

align services to accomplish the goals of the project - development and maintenance of roads, trails, and parks, water,

wastewater, development permitting, law enforcement, Fire and Rescue via TVFR and transit via tri-met and local provider

options.

(2) To Advance and Complement Regional Goals and Policies: The proposed grant will benefit the region in achieving

regional development goals as it reinforces Metro Council’s six desired outcomes: (1) The primary objective of the Master Plan

is to increase activity in the Main Street/Town Center, making it a vibrant place for the people who live and work there, and

that the broader community can easily access for everyday needs. (2) Using the Master Plan to achieve the vision for the Main

Street/Town Center will increase the economic prosperity of the city, which will help the city better serve its residents.

Creating a more vibrant focal point in the community will also maintain and attract more employers. (3) The Master Plan will

look at the multimodal network serving the Main Street/Town Center, ensuring safe and reliable transportation choices;

improved bicycle and pedestrian facilities within the center and transportation demand management techniques (TDM) will be

evaluated. (4/5) In setting the stage for a more complete community, and focusing on improved multi-modal connectivity,

reduced parking, and TDM opportunities, the strategies and actions identified by the plan can help reduce VMT and

associated GHGs.

Similarly, focusing on enhanced design in the center can provide more green infrastructure and urban canopy, which can

reduce energy and water use and improve the quality of stormwater runoff. (6) Finally, the Master Plan can support local and

regional equity goals by engaging underserved groups in the project and identifying opportunities to ensure these populations

experience the benefits envisioned by the plan. For example, working with minority-owned businesses in the Main

Street/Town Center can help identify strategies for supporting their entrepreneurial success and extending this opportunity to

other businesses. Similarly, working with developers and low income service providers to provide a variety of housing types

can help establish policies and incentives for ensuring affordable housing opportunities are built in the center with access to

existing infrastructure, transit, and services.

(3) Regional Significance: The project is designed to incorporate many of the Metro regional goals and recognizing the

area’s significance as a regional hub for the surrounding residential areas is paramount in the evaluation and development of

this master plan. Establishing the importance of this area as a principal center of urban life in the region is a primary objective

of the City’s, and illustrates the regional significance of this project. Our preliminary market studies indicate that not only is a

regional town center warranted in this area, but that a regional town center would thrive and serve a much larger area and

population outside of just King City. The project will perform an assessment of the Main Street/Town Center Plan (analyzing

physical and market conditions, physical and regulatory barriers, the development code, and existing and potential incentives

to encourage mixed use pedestrian-friendly and transit supportive development); and will result in the adoption of a plan that

outlines actions and investments, including revisions to land use regulations (to support a mix and intensity of uses) and

strategies to increase non-SOV mode share such as transportation system designs, system management and demand

management plans, and a parking management program.

In Addition this plan will lay out the framework of how the City can develop a sustainable Main Street/Town Center that will

help to realize the community plans and goals, accommodate projected populations, housing needs, and provide employment

opportunities, and/or maximize proposed and/or existing community assets such as public transit, parks, natural features, and

cultural districts.

3. PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH IS REASONABLE The application demonstrates a clear approach to achieving the expected outcome and result in consideration for adoption.

Where substantial coordination with other local, regional, and state planning efforts occur (or will need to occur), the

mechanisms and responsibilities for the coordination are clear. (Up to 20 Points)

(A) MILESTONES & DELIVERABLES:

M1: Execution of the IGA for the Land Use and Transportation Plan informing Master Plan

M2: Project kick-off

• Consultant scope of work

• Draft public involvement plan

• Project schedule

• Website / public involvement tools

• Committee list

• Planning Commission & City Council briefing packets

M3: Workshop 1: opportunities

• Existing conditions draft report

• Draft market analysis

• Committee, Planning Commission & City Council briefing packets

• Public workshop agenda & public comment summary

• Key opportunities summary

M4: Establish goals for Main Street/Town Center

• Committee, Planning Commission & City Council work session packets

• Memo: Main Street/Town Center goals

• Public comment summary

M5: Draft Land Use Plan

• Land Use map with circulation

• Draft feasibility analysis

• Initial trip / traffic analysis


M6: Community Design Charrette

• Agenda and materials from event


M7: Draft Master Plan

• Updated land use plan and trip analysis

• Draft strategies & actions for implementation

• Updated financial feasibility analysis


M8: Workshop 2: Master Plan

• Draft visualizations

• Agenda and materials from event


M9: Adopt Main Street/Town Center Master Plan

• State, regional, & local consistency analysis

• Final Master Plan document with analyses, detailed maps and illustrations, and a phased implementation plan

• Comprehensive plan map amendments (as identified through project)

• Development code amendments (as identified through project)

• Planning Commission & City Council hearing packets

(B) PROJECT MANAGEMENT:

Michael Weston King City - City Manager, in coordination with Keith Liden the City Planner will be the project managers and Metro’s main point of contact for the duration of the project.

The skills needed to complete the King City Town Center Master Plan will involve an array of staff at the City as well as the

professional services of a consultant team.

The Grant funds are proposed to fund consultant expense and King City Staff time needed to complete the scope of work outlined in the line item budget. The City will contribute up to $80,000 from the General Fund and Long Range Planning Fund, which has been committed to being spent on the City’s URA 6D Master Planning efforts. In addition, the City will provide in-kind contributions to cover the cost of City staff serving in a support role to the project (legal, GIS, communications, administrative, and finance).

Project Budget Summary

PERSONNEL COSTS Financial match

In kind match

TGM Grant funds TOTAL

Consultants $176,500.00 $176,500

Applicant staff $50,000 $20,000 $70,000

Partner staff $30,000 $20,000.00 $50,000

Other, Contingency Funds $0

Total for planning services $80,000 $196,500.00 $296,500

OTHER PROJECT COSTS

Direct costs, please list in narrative $0

Mailing, Printing, Public Meeting Expenses $53,700.00 $53,700

Overhead/indirect costs $0

Total for other costs $53,700.00 $53,700

TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $80,000 $20,000 $250,200 $350,200

Staff Consultants

Planning Planning

Engineering Natural Resources

Other Community Development Urban Design

City Attorney Market and Development Feasibility

GIS Cost Estimating and Finance Planning

Public Communication Traffic/Multi-Modal Trip Modeling

Administration Public Involvement

Finance Social and Digital Media

Project Management

Other

Mailing, Printing, Video, Public Meeting

Expenses

Consultant Expenses and Travel

(C) COST ASSUMPTIONS:

This project’s scope of work is similar to the level of work and budget needed for the City’s recent Concept

Planning Project; while an in-depth study, design and cost estimating of infrastructure was already performed this

effort does need more extensive public outreach and relationship-building, additional visualization and urban design

services, and a financial feasibility analysis for different development types.

• This scope of work and budget is similar to other master planning efforts.

• Personnel cost for the City use an hourly rate of $150 / hour, which represents the project manager’s

billable rate which is comprised of salary plus benefits plus any overhead expenses incurred by the City.

While other personnel will contribute to the project (at both higher and lower hourly rates), the majority of

hours will be spent by the project manager.

• Other personnel will include support staff for public outreach, events, and public hearings; directors’ review

of key deliverables and at hearings / events; and subject area expertise on the advisory committee and for

review of specific deliverables and elements of the plan (e.g. civil engineer to review traffic analysis and

connectivity recommendations, and public communications will review content and messaging of online

public involvement tools)

• Personnel cost for the consultant was estimated based on similar scopes of work.

MILESTONES AND DELIVERABLES:

M1: Execution of the IGA for the King City Master Plan

If awarded the transportation and growth Management Grant for the King City Transportation System Master

Plan,

King City’s project manager will work with Metro staff to execute an IGA for the project. Minimal time is billed

for this task in the budget.

M2: Project kick-off

This milestone consists of both Tasks 1 and 2, which will include selecting a consultant to provide professional

services to the project and the foundational activities to kick-off the project. King City Staff will draft a RFP,

review proposals, select a consultant team, and establish a scope of work with the consultant consistent with the

scope of work established in the executed IGA with TGM. Once established, the project team (staff +

consultants) will work together to establish a detailed project schedule and draft public involvement plan, which

is envisioned to be innovative, taking advantage of cutting-edge technology, using multiple platforms, and

complimenting with targeted outreach. Public involvement will rely heavily on individual and small-group

meetings, social media, and surveys, both online and at numerous community events, workshops, a design

charrette, and guidance from the Planning Commission, and City Council. During this task, the consultant

(and/or local technology students) will also set up the decided upon public involvement tools and launch them

to the public. A task force or advisory committee will also be established during this first phase and briefings

provided to the Planning Commission and City Council.

M3: Workshop 1: opportunities

During Task 3, the consultant will focus on analyzing existing conditions in the existing City Limits and Urban

Reserve Area and present this information at a public workshop (Milestone 3) to identify the key opportunities

that will form the basis of the goals and strategies for the Land Use and Transportation Plan. This work will

include an analysis of existing conditions, including opportunities and constraints; a market analysis to

determine potential types and scales of uses; and a multi-modal system analysis identifying barriers and

recommendations. This information will be presented to the established task force/committee as well as the

Planning Commission and City Council in preparation for the public workshop. Materials will be prepared for

the workshop and afterward, a summary describing the key opportunities will be drafted.

M4: Establish goals for the Main Street/Town Center

Milestone 4 is focused on establishing goals for the Main Street/Town Center. To get there, the project team

will complete Task 4 by pulling together information from the public workshop on opportunities, engaging key

stakeholders in the Main Street/Town Center area and broader community, and drafting goals and objectives.

The draft goals will be reviewed with the project task force/committee, Planning Commission and City Council

as well as with the public by use of the public involvement tools and online forums. This input and feedback

will be used to refine and finalize goals for the Main Street/Town Center Area.

M5: Draft Land Use and Transportation System Plan

With the goals established and an inventory of key opportunities and constraints, the consultant team, in

partnerships with city staff, will develop a land use and transportation plan (Task 5), graphically depicting the

vision for the area, including open space design, circulation and access, and the location and scale for various

uses and development including parks and open spaces. They will also complete a ROI feasibility analysis to

determine financial feasibility of desired development types and an initial traffic and multi-modal trip rate

analysis based on the land use plan. Final deliverables will include multi-modal street design standards, a list of

multi-modal system improvements, and land use and development code amendments consistent with TPR

requirements. The draft plan will be reviewed with the project task force/committee, Planning Commission and

City Council and refinements integrated in preparation for the Community Design Charrette.

M6: Community Design Charrette

To complete Task 5 of the project, the City and consultant team will host a design charrette with the community

to discuss how the established goals and opportunities might be realized on the ground; reviewing with them

the initial draft land use plan. The focus will be on how to use design to achieve the shared vision for the new

Main Street/Town Center. Working groups and work sessions will engage stakeholders in refining elements of

the land use plan and generating ideas for implementation and how to accomplish the vision. The project team

will present maps and illustrations, which may include 3-D illustrations or perspective renderings of key project

components, and hopefully utilize real-time software programs to reflect the input and ideas gathered during the

Charrette. The Charrette format will be refined based on the consultant team selected, but will be a critical

factor in gathering input from the community and key stakeholders in shaping the recommendations of the

Master Plan. A summary of the activities and results of the Community Design Charrette will be provided.

M7: Draft Master Plan

The results of the Community Design Charrette will be used to update the land use plan, traffic and multi-

modal trip analysis, financial feasibility analysis, and open space, green canopy, circulation and access

components of the plan. Initial draft strategies and actions for implementation will also be completed as part of

this task including recommendations to increase financial feasibility and property values for various uses

identified in the plan (e.g. residential, commercial, office, and institutional). It will also outline specific actions

that will remove barriers and encourage private investment in the Main Street/Town Center. The specific

actions will likely include new policies, opportunities for public private partnerships, establishing development

incentives, and program development to address challenges in the Main Street/Town Center. The consultant

will review Metro’s Community Investment Toolkit and other national best practices in identifying the most

appropriate strategies and actions. The draft Master Plan will be reviewed with the project task

force/committee, Planning Commission and City Council in preparation for a public workshop focused on the

Master Plan. All of these activities are associated with project Task 6 to achieve Milestone 7: A Draft Master

Plan including: Land Use Plan, Transportation System Plan, Parks and Natural Resources including trail

development and access, Finance Plan with System Development Charges.

M8: Workshop 2: Master Plan

To complete Task 6 of the project, the City and consultant team will host a public workshop focused on

refining the Master Plan. Updated maps and visualizations will be provided as well as the ideas and proposed

actions for implementing this Master Plan. Materials will be prepared for the workshop and afterward, a

summary drafted describing the input received. The draft Master Plan will also be shared through the public

involvement tools and online forums established at the beginning of the project and outlined in the public

involvement plan. This input and feedback will be used to refine and finalize the Main Street/Town Center

Master Plan and implementation plan.

M9: Adopt Master Plan

The final milestone for this project is adopting the Main Street/Town Center Master Plan. This includes both

Tasks 7 and 8: completing a state, regional, and local consistency analysis as well as a final draft Master Plan and

policy package. This process will evaluate the main street/town center boundary, the Transportation Planning

Rule (OAR 660- 012-0060), and Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 6; and will consider

appropriate policy responses including but not limited to establishing a Multimodal Mixed-Use Area in the study

area to reduce traffic generation and refinements to the main street/town center boundary. Any identified

comprehensive plan map and development code amendments needed to support the Master Plan will also be

drafted. A final Master Plan document will be prepared with analyses and key documents described in Tasks 1-6,

detailed maps and illustrations of key project components, and an implementation phasing plan, which identifies

areas most ripe for (re)development and actions most important to the success of the master plan. City staff will

package these documents for review and recommendation by the Planning Commission and adoption by the

City Council.

4. PROPOSED PROJECT HAS COMMUNITY SUPPORT The application demonstrates that there is local support for the project objectives, a commitment to participate, and a desire to

implement the expected outcome. (Up to 5 Points) (Attach Letters of Support)

This is a well-supported project and the City Council is ready to take action on a strategy for policy development and future

investment in the area. With specific regulatory changes resulting from the project, barriers can be removed and the stage set

for desired development. Engaging property owners, developers and businesses in the project will also prepare them to take

action once the plan is in place. A dynamic community engagement effort, along with visualizations of potential projects and

positive financial returns, will also help garner support and build interest, and therefore investment, in the area and the Master

plan.

5. PROPOSED PROJECT SPONSOR READINESS AND CAPACITY The application demonstrates that the local government is ready and able to begin the project within the TGM timetable and

that there is local commitment and capability to manage the project considering the complexity of the project, the size of the

jurisdiction, and performance on previous TGM projects. Where substantial coordination with other local, regional, and state

planning efforts will need to occur, all of the partners are ready and able to begin the project within the TGM timetable. (Up

to 10 Points)

Likelihood of full implementation: A Master Plan with the extensive list of project elements and engagement efforts

described in this project description will require significant resources. As such, the City is prepared to exceed the required 12%

match and provide funding at 30% of the estimated project costs plus in kind overages. These planning efforts need to be

completed prior to development in the region. Any work completed in this phase of planning work will further augment and

enhance the development efforts in the region and provide significant technical resources for development. The City is

committed to this concept as well as the major stakeholders and property owners, and whether it is 1 or 2 years this project

will reach full implementation within the near future.

Capacity of applicant: The skills needed to complete the elements of the master plan include: planning, urban design,

transportation engineering and modeling, development economics, public involvement, social media and visualization

techniques with legal, GIS, natural resources, government relations/communications, administrative and finance support.

Please see the budget narrative for the balance between staff and consultant services to complete the various tasks of the

project.

Jurisdictional Track Record and Governing body: The City Council is the governing body responsible for adopting a

Master Plan for the Main Street/Town Center and any accompanying amendments to comprehensive plan and zoning

designations, design guidelines, and development code regulations. The City Council will adopt these provisions by local

ordinance. Our City Council is currently the most diverse city council in the state of Oregon and possibly one of the most

functional. The entire Council is behind this effort in addition to the majority of our residents. King City has long been a

participating, but quite member of the Regional Council. For over 50 years King City has quietly existed with little to no

modifications to our boundaries, but there has been an awakening within King City and a resurgence of progressive thought

that has driven our desires to contribute to the regional aspirations and help address some of the issues relating to diversity,

our economy and economic opportunities, equitable housing and a variety of housing types, and finally it is our desire to create

a regionally significant Main Street/Town Center that can be a galvanizing feature for our community.

Public involvement: The City envisions an innovative public engagement plan using cutting-edge technology to reach as

many community members as possible. This could include using map-based public participation tools, such as MetroQuest or

CrowdSpot, as well as mobile applications and a QR Code to collect ideas, input, and images while people are on-the-go and in

the general vicinity. The project would be branded with a logo and tag line to provide unique identity and to generate

excitement. The city would complement these efforts with targeted outreach to specific stakeholders including local

businesses, property owners, for profit and non-profit developers; high school and college students; tech students and

employers; nearby farmers and producers; and residents. The project will work to engage traditionally underserved

communities, including low-income and minority populations, by contacting minority and women-owned builders, reaching

out to AARP, building on and implementing Metro’s Diversity Initiatives, local PCA/PTA, soccer groups, Veterans, and

through the City’s in Community Centers and Libraries, which tend to have very diverse clientele. With such a broad and

diverse group of people at the table, the final plan will be more balanced and representative of the whole community; get as

many people excited about the plan as possible; build partnerships; and invest people in taking action. Involvement

opportunities will include an advisory committee, workshops / charrette, focus groups, visual preference surveys, and online

feedback tools.

6. UP TO 10 BONUS POINTS: PROPOSED PROJECT IS INNOVATIVE The application demonstrates that the project will be innovative in its subject matter, approach, or expected outcomes. For

example, the project will use health impact assessments or economic impact analysis as part of the evaluation of transportation

alternatives or will include an innovative multimodal analysis.

Addressed Above

BREAKDOWN OF COSTS BY PROJECT MILESTONES

PROJECT MILESTONE (Phase, element, deliverable, etc.)

Grant applicant personnel costs

Partner(s) personnel costs

Consultant fees

Other project costs

TOTAL

Milestone 1: Execute IGA $200.00 $200.00

Task 1: Select Consultant $500.00 $500.00

RFP Process / Develop Contract $6,000.00 $500.00 $6,500.00

Task 2: Project Setup $2,000.00 $2,000.00

Draft Public Involvement Plan $1,500.00 $1,000.00 $2,500.00

Detailed Schedule $1,500.00 $1,000.00 $2,500.00

Create Website Engagement Tools $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $3,000.00

Set Up Task Forces/Committees $2,000.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $3,500.00

City Council & Planning Commission Briefings $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00

MileStone 2: Project Kick-Off

Task 3: Existing Conditions Report $5,000.00 $500.00 $5,500.00

Existing Policy and Plan Analysis $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00

Opportunites & Constrains Analysis $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $3,000.00

Market Analysis $1,000.00 $10,000.00 $11,000.00

Multi-Modal Systems Analysis $1,000.00 $9,000.00 $10,000.00

Open Space & Green Space Evaluation $1,000.00 $2,500.00 $3,500.00

Existing Conditions Report $3,000.00 $5,000.00 $8,000.00

Committee Meeting $500.00 $500.00 $1,000.00

City Council & Planning Commission Briefings $500.00 $500.00 $1,000.00

Milestone 3: Workshop 1 - Opportunities

Task 4: Develop Goals and Objectives $5,000.00 $5,000.00

Engage Key Stakeholders $500.00 $400.00 $500.00 $1,400.00

Draft Goals and Objectives $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00

Committee Meeting $1,000.00 $400.00 $1,000.00 $2,400.00

City Council & Planning Commission Briefings $750.00 $500.00 $1,250.00

Public Outreach $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00

Milestone 4: Establish Main Street/Town Center Goals

Task 5: Draft Land Use Plan $15,000.00 $5,000.00 $20,000.00

Develop Base Map with Access, Circulation, & Uses $3,500.00 $6,000.00 $3,000.00 $12,500.00

Initial Finacial Feasibility Analysis $5,000.00 $8,000.00 $5,000.00 $18,000.00

Initial Traffic and Multi-Modal Trip Rate Analysis $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00

Committee Meeting $750.00 $400.00 $1,000.00 $2,150.00

City Council & Planning Commission Briefings $750.00 $1,000.00 $1,750.00

Milestone 5: Draft Land Use Plan $5,000.00 $5,000.00

Updated Plan and Event Materials $4,000.00 $4,000.00

Community Charrette & Outreach $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00

Milestone 6: Community Design Charrette $25,000.00 $25,000.00

Task 6: Draft Master Plan $20,000.00 $5,000.00 $25,000.00

Traffic / Trip Analysis $2,500.00 $23,000.00 $4,000.00 $29,500.00

Financial Feasibility Analysis $2,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $12,000.00

Draft Strategies and Actions $2,000.00 $400.00 $2,500.00 $4,900.00

Draft Visualizations $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $4,500.00

Committee Meeting $750.00 $400.00 $1,000.00 $2,150.00

City Council & Planning Commission Briefings $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00

Milestone 7: Draft Master Plan $2,000.00 $5,000.00 $7,000.00

Revise Plan $1,000.00 $1,000.00

Draft Visualization and Event Materials $1,000.00 $1,000.00

Public Workshop & Outreach $5,000.00 $1,500.00 $6,500.00

Milestone 8: Workshop 2 - Master Plan $5,000.00 $5,000.00

Task 7: State, Regional, & Local Consistency Analysis $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00

Review Local Zoning Code for Barriers $500.00 $750.00 $1,000.00 $2,250.00

UGMFP Title 6 Consistency/Recommendations $500.00 $750.00 $1,000.00 $2,250.00

TPR / MMA Analysis & Recommendation $500.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00

Other Regional / State Regulations $500.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00

Task 8: Final Draft Master Plan & Policy Package $10,000.00 $5,000.00 $15,000.00

Comprehensive Plan $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $5,000.00 $8,000.00

Development Code Amendments $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $5,000.00 $8,000.00

Detailed Maps/Illustrations $500.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $3,500.00

Phased Implementation Plan $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00

Adoption by Planning Commission & City Council $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00

Milestone 9: Adopt KC Master Plan $2,000.00 $2,000.00

Presentation or Summary of lessons learned

Milestone 10: Share Best Practices

Overhead/Indirect $10,500.00 $10,500.00

GRAND TOTAL $70,000.00 $50,000.00 $176,500.00 $53,700.00 $350,200.00

Department of Land Use & Transportation Office of the Director

155 N First Avenue, Suite 350, MS 16, Hillsboro, OR 97124-3072 phone: 503-846-3822 • fax: 503-846-3588

www.co.washington.or.us/lut • [email protected]

June 28, 2017 Mr. Tim O’Brien METRO 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland, Oregon 97232 RE: Metro 2040 Planning and Development Grant – King City URA 6D Master Plan Dear Mr. O’Brien: Washington County supports King City’s application for a Metro 2040 Planning and Development grant to produce a master plan for URA 6D, which will allow for the continuation of the concept planning work currently being conducted for this area. King City is currently managing an inclusive concept planning process involving the public, stakeholders, and government partners, including Washington County, with the goal of submitting a UGB expansion proposal in May 2018. Completion of a final comprehensive concept plan that is agreed upon by all partners is an important first step in the planning process for the urban reserve area. This grant project would allow King City to build on the infrastructure cost estimates and methods of financing agreed upon for the final concept plan and continue to refine the specific land use details identified in the final concept plan. Washington County looks forward to continuing to work with King City on their efforts to implement a final concept plan for URA 6D with the support of this grant. Sincerely, Andrew Singelakis, AICP Director, Land Use & Transportation cc: Michael Weston, City Manager, City of King City

RACIAL AND ETHNIC IMPACT STATEMENT This form is used for informational purposes only and must be included with the grant application.

Chapter 600 of the 2013 Oregon Laws require applicants to include with each grant application a racial and ethnic impact statement. The statement provides information as to the disproportionate or unique impact the proposed policies or programs may have on minority persons1 in the State of Oregon if the grant is awarded to a corporation or other legal entity other than natural persons.

1. The proposed grant project policies or programs could have a disproportionate or unique positive impact onthe following minority persons:

Indicate all that apply:

Women Asians or Pacific Islanders Persons with Disabilities American Indians African-Americans Alaskan Natives Hispanics

2. The proposed grant project policies or programs could have a disproportionate or unique negative impact onthe following minority persons:

Indicate all that apply:

Women Asians or Pacific Islanders Persons with Disabilities American Indians African-Americans Alaskan Natives Hispanics

3. The proposed grant project policies or programs will have no disproportionate or unique impact on minoritypersons.

If you checked numbers 1 or 2 above, please provide below the rationale for the existence of policies or programs having a disproportionate or unique impact on minority persons in this state. Further provide evidence of consultation with representative(s) of the affected minority persons.

By checking this box, I hereby certify the information contained on this Dated: form is true, complete, and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

Printed Name: Title:

Agency Name:

1 “Minority person” are defined in SB 463 (2013 Regular Session) as women, persons with disabilities (as defined in ORS 174.107), African Americans, Hispanics, Asians, or Pacific Islanders, American Indians and Alaskan Natives.

https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/lawsstatutes/2013orLaw0600.pdf

transportation and growth management program … · entail analysis, evaluation of alternative...

Documents