transmittal letter, copies of pertinent records … · lacoste c, ronberg gravity -eter which is...

DEVINE & NYQUISTATTORNEYS AT LAW

«6 HANOVER STREETDAILY MIRROR OFFICE BUILDING

P.O. BOX 1540MANCHESTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03105-15*3

LEE C. NYQUISTKEVIN C. DEVINECOREY BELOBROWT. DAVID PLOURDEMERRICK C. WEINSTEINMAUREEN E. RAICHE

TELEPHONE: (603) 668-588STELECOPIER: <«/>) 668-F902

April 4, 1989

Mr. James ZeppieriDepartment of Environmental Services6 Hazen DriveP.O. Box 95Concord, New Hampshire 03301

Re: OK Tool, Inc.

Dear Mr. Zeppieri:

Pursuant to your request, enclosed please find copies of thepertinent records from the file of John Kick regarding hisSeismic Refraction and Gravity Data. If you have any furtherquestions or concerns regarding Mr. Kick's file, please do nothesitate to contact me.

In addition, enclosed please find copies of two mapsindicating the floor plan of the old building taken by the Statethrough eminent domain in 1977. At this time, I am unaware ofany other maps or floor plans that will be of assistance to you.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have anyquestions or concerns.

Very truly yours.

o\<r\

Maureen E. Raiche

MER:twaEnclosures

«r•N.

0

K

£

£ -j

o ^u <

? o1

X ^0 t

o

1on0

! ^8

'o

V

JoO

KiO

8

SEISMIC REFRACTION AND GRAVITY DATAO.K. TOOL COMPANY SITEMILFORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE

from surveys completed in October, 1983by Dr. John F. Kick, Geophysicist.

I. SEISMIC REFRACTION SURVEY

Station

SP-1

sp-1sp-1sp-1sp-1sp-1sp-1sp-1sp-1sp-1sp-1sp-1sp-1

SP-2

sp-2sp-2sp-2sp-2sp-2sp-2sp-2sp-2sp-2sp-2sp-2sp-2

* 10+ 20+ 40+ 604 804 100+ 1204 140+ 1604 180-»- 200+ 210

(sp-1 -f 220)

+ 10+ 20•f 40+ 60+ 80+ 100+ 120+ 140+ 160+ 180•«• 2004- 210

GroundSurface

Elevation

276.2

275.9276.1275.2273.6274.5272.2273.2271.7271.9272.4272.8273.1

274.5

274.6273.4273.9272.927.3.4273.8274.1274.2273.6273.5272.8272.2

DepthTo

Bedrock

72

727272707069696969707071

71

717070696968686765646363

SP-3 (sp-2 .+ 220) 272.2 64

Station

SP-3 (sp-2 •(

sp-3 + 25sp-3 + 50sp-3 + 75sp-3 + 100sp-3 + 150sp-3 + 200sp-3 + 250sp-3 + 275sp-3 + 300sp-3 •+• 325sp-3 + 350sp-3 •*• 375

SP-4 (sp-3 +

sp-4 + 25sp-4 + 50sp-4 +75sp-4 + 100sp-4 •»• 150sp-4 + 200sp-4 + 250sp-4 + 300sp-4 + 350sp-4 + 375sp-4 + 400sp-4 + 425

SP-5 (sp-4 +

II. GRAVITY

H 220)

400}

450)

SURVEY

GroundSurface

Elevation

272.2

272.0271.2270.8270.8270.9271.4270.8

269.1268.3267.9268.1

268.6

268269268270268.6270.2271.1269.7270.1270.0270.1270.2

270.5

DepthTo

Bedrock

64

666769707375777777777879

80

818282828386888788899090

89

Station

G-lG-2G-3G-4G-5

GroundSurface

Elevation

276.2272.5274 .4273.7272.3

DepthTo

Bedrock

7273698072

Station

G-6G-7G-8G-9G-10

G-llG-12G-13G-14G-15

GroundSurface

Elevation

270.9270.8269.5268.3270.5

270.2270.1269.8270.5272.1

DepthTo

Bedrock

7987838587

8887889093

G-16G-17G-18G-19G-20

G-21G-22G-23G-24G-25

G-26G-27G-28G-29G-30

G-31G-32G-33G-34G-35

G-36G-37G-38G-39G-40

273.2273.3273.5273.1273.9

274.0275.5276.0275.7274.0

272.9273.1272.9272.9272.7

272.2271.8273.3273.2272.8

271.6271.7271.3270.7268.3

8383777781

7771697274

7878807483

8485778782

8586868691

G-41 270.1

SEISMIC REFRACTION' A"D GRAVITY INVESTIGATIONO.K. TOOL COMPANT SITEMILFORD, KSK HAMPSHIRE

Prepared for

r:oR:iA%'DEAU ASSOCIATES, i:;c.25 Nashua Road

F.cdford, Vow Hampshire 03102

Prepared by

JOHN F. KICK, PH.D.CoophysicistP.O. Box 6

Hunstablo, Massachusetts 01827(617) 6/19-6650

October 19S3

SEIS-.-IC n:ri!ACTio;: AND GRAVITY L.O.K. TOOL COM?A:,T SITE'IILFORD, KEK HAMPSHIRE

INTRODUCTION

A seisnic refraction and Gravity investigation was co-pitted on the

O.K. Tool Conpany, Inc. site in liilford, New Kanpshire by John F. Kick,

Consulting Geophysicist. The purpose of the investigation was to

deternine the depth of bedrock and other detectable interfaces and the

nature of subsurface naterials. The information is needed to support a

hy^roceolocic study that is being conducted by N'or-.anJeau Associates,

Inc.

FIELDl.'ORK

A total of 4 seisr.ic lines (1295 linear feet of traverse) were

conducted on Aucust 2D, 1983. The lines nal'.e up the two seisnic profiles

on Fic'-ire 1. On Aucust 26, 1983 precision gravity measurements were nade

on 1 stations. Land -.urface elevations were surveyed for all gravity

and seisnic stations to facilitate interpretation.

SEISMIC REFRACTION METHOD

Theory. The seis-iic refraction rothod is based on the fact that

seisnic sliocl; waves traw-1 at different velocities in mtcrials that have

different clastic properties. In general, the velocity of seisnic wave

transnission increase-; as the density or conpactness are increased. The

-.i.F. Kirk 01-

method is only effective in situations where the deeper ."iat»rials have

higher velocities, which fortunately, is the nost comon shallow depth

situation in nature. For example, the velocity of a seisnic wave

traveling through bedrock is usually much greater than one traveling

through unconsoli'iated soils. Kater saturated soils generally have

significantly higher velocities than dry soils. In bedrock, dense

unfractured strata tend to have higher seisnc velocities than fractured,

weathered, or cavernous strata.

Instrumentation. Field equipment on this project included a S.I.E.

12-channel recording refraction seismograph and straight-line geophone

arrays with take out intervals of 20-feet and 50-feet. Explosives were

used to provide high energy shock waves, with shot depths generally in

the range of 2 to 4 feet.

SIISXIC DATA ANALYSIS

Seisr.ic transit tines were read on seismograms that were recorded

during the fieldwor':. The transit tines were then plotted versus

distance on graphs. The wave that is measured is the first refraction

to ?rrive at each gcophone. This wave is a corpressional wave which is

also known as the primary wave (or "P-wavc"). The graphs were then used

to compute compressinn.il wave velocities for the various types of

overburden and bedrock that were encountered. The critical distance

formula was then used to compute the depth of the various velocity

layers.

GRAVITY METHOD

Theory. The gravity nothod is based on the fart th.it the various

soils and bedrock often have different densities. The pull (or

acceleration) of gravity varies froin point to point on the Earili's

siirf.ico ilopcMi.ting on the density of iindorlyini' ivitori.il r.. Typically,

soils have lower densities than hodroek and w.itcr s.ituv.it.i-il soils ,nro

denser tV.ar. dry soil'-. I" :. gravity survey, thick deposits of soils .-.re

distinguished by ano-.alously lov gravity neasurernents.

Gravity Fieldvor;'.. Ir. cor.i'jcting a gravity survey for the purpose

of neasuring depth of bedrock, a precision gravity neter is usea to

measure the acceleration of gravity at points alone traverse lines or in

a grid-like pattern. The r.-^asurenents on this project were r.ade with a

LaCoste c, Ronberg gravity -eter which is capable of high resolution work.

Land surface elevations of each gravity station were obtained to

well within -KJ.l foot by leveling. Station elevations were tieti to a

U.S. Geological Survey bench nark referenced to the nean sea level datun.

Gravity Data Analysis. Standard Hoii£uer data reductions were

applied to the field ncMsursr^nts. Base station values were fitted to

cor.puter generated tical curves to correct for drift. Terrain

corrections wore r.ade where necessary, '.."hen the various sources of error

are taken into consideration, nost of the computed gravity values arr;

considered within a rolatix-e accuracy of +0.03 nilligals. A r.illigal is

a unit of neasurenent used to quantify snail differences in

gravitational acceleration. One j~al is crjual to one centinetcr per

second per second, or 1000 nilli^als.

An inportant step in the analysis involves separating the effects of

soil thickness fron effects caused by largo scale density variations

within the underlying bedrock. In accomplishing this, maps and profiles

of both local and regional Kouguor gravity are prepared. Ncsilual

gravity values are then obtained by subtracting the regional fron tho

local gravity values. The residual gravity trends are of special

interest bccaur.c they correlate closely with the trend of the buried

liodrock surface.

Rc»lri<cU di'ptli ro -jnit.it inn? are n.iilo for e.u-li gravity st.vtio'i ir.i'ig .1

1. Kesiiual gravity.

2. Ground elevation

3. Estimated thickness of cry soils above water ta?le.

4. Density contrast for dry and water saturated soil versus

becroc!-: estimated fror. bedroc?. r.3.ps.

P.IISVLTS

The interpreted seisrr.ic results are presented in the forr. of

elevation profiles in Figure 1. The profiles show overburden (soils) and

bedroc'r. seis~.ic velocities that -•ere r.er.sured and the cor.puted derth of

bedroc'ri. The investigation renultert in two profiles; I'rofiles A ani '.

Because of the relatively deep Leiroc): on this project lone (500 to GOO

feet) seisr.ic arrays were used for r.jch of the -,:ork. This provides jood

information for cor.putin<; aeptli of bedrock, but ^ives a widely scattered

sar:plin£ of upper overburden velocities. Because of ti.is, velocity

changes are not precisely defined for the upper-.ost layer.

The following taMe -.itches the co~pi:terf seisr.ic velocities with

probable earth nnterinls:

Seismic Velocity Probable Earth "aterial

(feet per second)

1300 to 2000 rnr..ittirrtte't soils. ";iy v:irlnrl.

•1.1:1.!, ;-.r.ivi-l, silt, .1:1.1 cl.iy.

:l.iy?y) cr r.Dist (-.or saturated)

~rarrjlar soils.

.Loose, water-saturated overburden, "ay

incl-jde sand, gravel, silt or clay. Loose

sandy rills -ay lie within the upper end o:

this ranee.

£500 .l.'ater saturated co-.oact glacial till.

13,200 to 15,500. .Competent crystalline bedrock.

Profile A. This profile trends roughly r.ortheast - southwest

paralleling the .Souhe^an I'.iver. The co.'~.pute~ depth of bedroci". varies

fro~ s. r.inimr. of 63 feet near shotpoint 3 to a r.axir.ur. of 31 feet at

shotpoint i>. Seis.-.ic velocities indicate a thin layer of ur.saturated

loose sandy soils (1500 ft/sec) over co.npact water saturated glacial till

(t5'JO ft/sec) aloni; the southwest end of this profile. At shotpoints 2

and 3 a n".nr-surface seis-.ic velocity of 31i)0 ft/sec r.ay be indicative of

sor.e-.chat silty or clayey unsaturated soils, or sands and r,ravels

containing a relatively hich noisture content (not saturated). A thick

water-saturated layer in the 5000 to 5600 ft/sec ran^e is indicative of

loose overburden naterials, but the higher velocities nay indicate the

presence of loose sandy --.lacial till, r.elativ.-ly hich bcdrocl: velocities

of IS, 2(10 to lr>,j()f) ft/sec indicate? competent bedrock.

Profile I'. Profile Ti trt'iuls north - r..mt)> across the oast part of

the O.K. Tool (~rvi;':i:iy -jite. Tlif c<vT;mto.! (U'l'tli of '.icilroi-l; r.imv«; fi>r"i a

i- \ •Y.-J\\\ 'if -:] f.>rt .U :-.'i.i: I'uVil .'i to a -i.»\i' IT : »f "2 ;"••'•( .it --hut |<ui-it r>.

\ f.in near-sarf ac-: Iv'er ...t', i. volocitv of _!';.!',• :t/-->^c i:, '.-.:. :.;tivr_ of

loose ur.sit _:rat»;. ov.-rbjr :e~. 7~.-3 layjr ~s ;•. acrlai". V' a la; .r lav.n;

c vvlocit;. of 33oC' ft/sec -"licr; ~iy r 3~,r 2-->c-it loos.- wat:r 3j.f.r-.t jd

3".icial outwash ceposits and/or wat^r saturated loose sa~.Jy jlicial ^:I1.

-. Doiroc': velocity of 13,^00 f~/sec is -.-dica-ivo of co-poteat

crystalline bo^roc':.

li is li-:ely t.nat a "tidier, layer" of co-.pact glacial till '£500

ft/sec) overlies ieirocl: a:ross the site. Such a layer, if unzntecte.!,

wo-^lc! ca-J3'2 bcirocl: to appoar shallov;er to the seisr.ic refract.o-j net ioC

thar. its actual lepth. Tne depth uiscrepancy would be roughly in

proportion to the thic-:ness of the "hidden layer".

Co-.ûted Penth of Bedrock '.'.z^. The lepth of hedrock contour -ip in

Ti^jre 1 i; Das:d or. r.ot'. cr"'-v--y cr-d seio"ic -er.r. :re le-.t-;. -r-.v.ty

" easjre"e~.ts were "".ij,0 .".cross r.'jc . of ti° site LCC.IUÔ of its

inaccessibility to t'.ie sois-ic -.otnod. vjch areas incluaod pcv;-^nt i-v!

t'ie Insiie of the :~.aiT h'jildinr. Goisr.lc r^fractl n hocricl; d"~th

i-.for~.atior. was the basis for a gravity .-.odel of layer thic'iness and

layer density for the site. 7ne r.ap shows t.iat the trend of tic bedrock

surface dips fror. west to east across the site. The shallowest bedrock

'l^ss than 10 feet) is found at two points near the west end of the sit",

while the deepest bedroc!: (over 90 feet) was detected along the east

bor.!or of t'.io site.

\CCIT.ACY OF SEISMC DATA

In c.enoral, exporiencf chov.-s that the co-ipnt'-'d soisnic rir>; ths at

shot points aro witliin t^n porcent of t!ie true d^ptli. It is usually

possible to ilctorr.ine the ip|>roxinate trend of P'O bîlroc'.; surface

between rhot points. The depth accnr.icy 'f tho trend of tlie bci'.rocl;

:..irf.icf b^rwi-'a ..hot poi-it<= i<; so ••••what 1-^ss :'ITI the c" put-'il I'-ptli a

I'a^'li -'ii.1 of A '..''is .ic Hn-1. <MiM'->t l"i«'%«; hii'.h v-'or: • y ovr'ur 1 - % l i '. lyvs

"•: l.i J..;o~. botv-'o:. l.v.:ir v-jl-i-ty -.it-irir.!; ir.i 'li^-.-v-jlocity :.~:r-jc;

Su:h "hiidor. Ipyors" can c^.use errors ir. the co-.;r.;tiiiori of i»oarocl;

depth. Situatior.s v'i-jr-2 c low or velocity r.aterial is overlain bv a

hi;.ner velocity layer, car. result ir. a significant bedrocl: -T-3pth

co~.Di:tatior. error if this situation is r.ot iiar-n

APPENDIX B

NAI TEST PIT LOGS

TEST PIT FIELD LOG

naiN A I CEO

WEATHE

DEPTH

— 2' — ,

— 4' —

— 6* —

— \z' —

— 13' —

— u' —

LOGIST

R S.jr

PROJECT _ • TEST Pi

nfqCRIPTION r . K , T^^l rn ' FILE No

1 nrjVTIQN -il'or,!. •:•' HATF . .

' N0 ~t!r~P--.-.-O,

EXCAVATION E Q U I P M E N T ronm.1 r. rv - , - , . - .r*W»r»l. P^TBtCTOR G«OUNO E.EV ;..,., ,

nv. 60 'sWBlTftR TIME STARTED _ _ 1113jl<r WARE unnriCAWCITY CjyO. REACH 19 11

SOIL DESCRIPTION

e

1o

c* cc »

i 5

CVA -

b-kgrd

2

dry It brown and brown, f/c sand, some cravel,little silt.

may be fill component

yellow br f/c sand, little f gravel, tr silt.

various fcrown colored strata O-4" thick)

sonc strata cuite silty, -mottled,ethers ur.iforn r/c sand xred bandln1'

boulders, gravel, cobbles, little m/c sar.d (intcrstitia

sand moist •,3d!^:t,~^fS'£^3&f*s

rounded boulders color: light grey fcroun

some flattened,

becoming coarser at the base:

to tr nv/c sand, more pea gravel sizes

BOIh-v-M.B'measured WL (surface) : 11.4' below

surface '? 1700 hrs

HE COMPETED 1445

E*CAVtrroRT

di f f .

, lff .

d i f f .

rii'f

d i f f .d i f f .

f* . f f

80UUOERCOUNT

OTY CLASS

Many A

A

A3 B

Mnny 1

fMnv AMany A

A

BtUiXHNo

R E M A R K S ' - OVA readings 9 background level both in pit, excavated mat ' lIS1 casing installed for OW

TEST PIT PLAN LEGEND:

1 U- -H

T 0N O R T H

V O L U M E « . ; .

1 PROPORTIONS 1 ABBREVIATIONS! EXCAVATION

BOyLOER. COUNT J ILSifc lr.r,«uu

J i Z C "AHCt LtTTt" |T««£t (TR| 0 -10% C • CO*«SECL*S

f*'''|C

t*T10N "^"'""lUTTLtlLD 10-20% ,J/e'J«t?S

J*"»NO UHStH C l»"0 " • *>"/• 1 •" • ""OOHcuyd 'EL • itiLO*

1 EFFORT

-tt>W« S™^""»*•« I G R O U N D W A T E R

((.•••str ,'IMC -0 'CTcwL»t»C'NG JL.

( M B J I "

TEST PIT FIELD LOG

naiNAI GEOLOGIST

LEATHER --

PROJECT TEST PIT No nw.

nFSCRIPTION " f Tr,î r« ' FILE No tfj

1 OPTION ^ I'-.-.rH iM! . DATE C,.,,.OT

EXCAVATION EQUIPMENT roiiun r. rv/ 2 7 0 1peNaâJf; rn^THArroR GROUND EÊV i JjJ. —

--J.. B.-.'c J— .

•^FHiTntt =fliil TIME STARTED IJa<;amr v^.cr- MnnnCAOtTITY cur« RFACM IP f!

DEPTH

— 3' —

— II1 —

i V

SOIL DESCRIPTION

OVA -

bkgrd

OVA -

b'rcrd

top soil

It yellow brown vf/m sandy snme silt, tr gravel

becoming arey-grecn t mottled v.f/f sand, sone silt

light whitish b

f/c gravel, lit

&

BOH *

neasured 1O. (su

R E M A R K S ^ OVA background •1 • probably Aeolian

TEST PIT PLAN LEGEND;

con tact- sharp,

rown cobbles/boulders, some

tie IT./V.C. interstitial sand.

liA'-^^^X ur.it-becor.es coarser=C?2?3< w/depth: bigger boulders,

tr to little c/v.c. sand.

11.7-

rface) : 8.4' below surface

0 1700 hrs.

rou')Iily l.S' silt inbottT of w«ll screen

ME CO"""

EXCAVEFFORT

BOULDtRCOUNT

OTr a*ss

A

A

A

A

A

AB

IS

REMARKNo

1

1

• 4

I PROPORTIONS 1 ABBREVIATIONS! EXCAVATIONJ k- 15 -H BOULDER COUNT ! iL$£fi. ' f.-ft« ...

P Yfl'^/i

' 0NORTH

VOLUME t

Silt RANSECLASSlflC»TlO

LETTER |TRACt (TR) 0 • I0*/p C • COARSE

A ILITTLCILI) io-!0% | J/"."Ji^ ^ ,

B |SOMC (SO) ?0-55*,. 1 V ' Vt",

R c IAND 3S-iO% | 6N -PKOWSirtL • »tLLCw

EFFORT1 c CAST

:OAI'M IGROUMDWATERr

iHRSI ~

TEST PIT FIELD LOG

naiNAI GEOLOGIST

WFATHEH ,--iy

DeNatalc

PROJECT . ' TEST Pi

DESCRIPTION c.y.. Tool FI^E No

T No 0«^

5£D

10CATION Illford, M! OATF 9-26-S3

EXCAVATION EQUIPMENT GB rv ni.7-npF RATnR 7r iV ' - '~r' ^' • ^-'''''MT^ TIME STARTED , 1 ?rj^UAKF VAOF MnnFI

?•• .,..„,. CAP6CITT , cjr i RFACH '= fl

DEPTH

— z1 —

— 3* — i

B *

— 13' —

SOIL DESCRIPTION

OVA -bkcd

OVA -Lr.gd

2-

fill or topsoilIt. yellow br vf/n sand, and silt

1 7

-Sharp contact

whitish-trown cooblcs t ooulders, little m/vc

sand, f/c gravel (as r.atrix)^ boulders, rofcblos

i,VOV-«e. ). placod like stonewor

^JJ^^VjCT-o. fit toaether nicely.

with increasing depth:

more boulders than cotbles.

only v/c sand, f

estimated

BOH - 14'

/c gravel matrix

OVJ-4 1.1. C."p pf c.i = jn9) - )2 .1P'WL (top of qrour.dl'11.16'

roughly 1' of «ilt in-. ;J« well screen

WE COMPLETED __12£0_

E X C A VEFFORT

easy

easy

easy

diff.

diff.

di f f .

diff.

V

• iff.

diff.

V

diff.

Vji-f f r

diff.

cliff .

V

J» f f

eouLCE*COUNT

OTY O.ASS

A

A

A

A

A.B

A.B

A,B

A,B

A.B

r. n

REMARKNo

REMARKS1 OVA used to monitor organic vapors during progress of digging hole.Background levels observed throughout digging (bkgd«< ppm)

TEST PIT PLAN LEGEND: 1 PROPORTIONS 1 ABBREVIATIONSI EXCAVATION

J^K- _J BOULDER COUNT ! Uitfi. r.-riM

' 6NORTH

\OLUME *

rLA-JirlcImi. nr^rTNTAtTl!oNl'"l*a (TR| 0 - <0*/. C • COARSECL* jSIFtCATlDN DESIGN AT (On1 f /U FlNC 'O»•-,,- A lnTTitui) 10- ?W. r /c-rmt io

^t'A-O LA1GCH C 1 t>(l> JS-SO% 1 BN -BV-ONCur<J 'fL • UH.CW

1 EFFORTE EAST

-EDUM 1 g ffnCULT1

-0"151 IGROUNOWATER

^§^L

APPENDIX C

WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS

Uf-I

»3?.KA?.'GEAU ASSOCIATES, Ii,'C.

WATER-LEVEL MEASUREMENTS

C L I E N T O. K. Tool Cor.ranv PROJECT NO.

LOCATION .viifnrd. ?:H

NOTES

WELL NO.

OW-2

OK-1

OW-4

OK- 3

S-l

S-2

S-3

PP-IDC -*

oM-la

of/-1h

0

M-2

*Measurcd

"Initial r

DATE

9/27/83

9/27/83

9/27/83

9/27/83

9/27/83

9/27/83

9/27/83

9/27/S3

9/29/83

9/->9/fn

10/3/83

olow top o:

adir.gs

TIME

11:12 A

11:16 A

11:22 A

11:27 A

AM

AM

AM

12:02 P

15:30

steel edge

HELD

14.00

14.00

13.00

13.00

19.55

17.00

17.00

13.00

downstrea

WET

2.55

1.13

0.85

0.40

0. 56

3.26

2.67

2.36

•n side

DTW

11.45

12.87

12.15

12.60

19.09

13.74

14.33

10.64

HP -EL

274.73

724.38

272.63

273.68

267.52

265.15

262.77

288.58

277.93

277.93

275.34

W/L ELEV.

263.28

261.51

260.48

261.08

266.56

264.03

261.37

269.49

264.19

263.60

264.60

ASSOCIATES, K.'C.


CLIENT O.K. Tool Company PROJECT NO.

LOCATION Mil ford, NH

NOTES Second round of measurements, rain day & night before

WELL NO.

OW-l

<-!!••- •)

r*T.-_ -5

S-l

5-2

S-3

M-la

••:-ib

v-~>o

X-3a

K-3b

O

K-5a

M-5b°

OW-4

"initial

DATE

10/6/83

i n/fi/p?

10/6/83

10/6/83

10/6/83

10/6/83

10/6/83

10/6/P.3

i n/A /R-3

10/6/83

10/6/83

10/10/83

10/10/83

10/6/R3

readings

TIME

0930

f T) c;

0910

0935

0920

0915

0940

0945

r>?'^*,

1015

1015

1300

1300

0905

HELD

14.00

i •>. . oo

13.00

—

--

—

16.00

16.00

i P. no

17.00

18.00

18.00

18.00

14.00

WET

1.15

1 .64

0.55

—

—

--

1.93

2.45

7 1 1

1.90

5.50

6.55

6.25

1.B3

DTW

12.85

1 1 ">£

12.45

0.81

1.04

1.26

14.07

13.55

in qq

15.10

12.30

11.45

11.15

12.17

MP-EL

274.38

">74 .71

273.68

267.52

265.15

262.77

277.93

277.93

T7S 34

272.34

272.34

272.35

272.35

272.63

W/L ELEV.

261.53

263.. 37

261.23

266.71

264.11

261.51

263.86

264.38

?fi4 45

257.24

260.04

260.90

261.20

260.46

;,QRMAN'DEAU ASSOCIATES, INC.


CLIENT O.K. Tool Conr.anv PROJECT NO. 569

LOCATION Milford, NH Weather: clear, 40°

NOTES Complete synoptic survey of ML pts on OK property.

WELL NO.

OW-l

OW-2

OW-3

OW-4

S-l

S-2

S-3

M-la

M-lb

M-2

M-3a

M-3b

M-4

M-5a

.. M-r,h

H £>

DATE

10/21/83

10/21/83

10/21/83

10/21/83

10/21/82

10/21/83

10/21/83

10/21/83

10/21/83

10/21/83

10/21/83

10/21/83

10/21/83

1H/P1 X R T

i n / ? ! /ai

T I M E

1110

1100

1025

1020

1120

1115

10/30

0900

0855

0915

0930

0940

0950

1000

i m n

HELD

14.00

13.00

13.00

13.00

18.00

15.00

15.00

17.00

18.00

18.00

17.00

i 7 . nn

WET

1.20

1.73

0.49

0.94

4.05

1.48

4.16

4.00

5.55

3.63

3 .43

•< 9?

1 03

DTW

12.80

11.27

12.51

12.06

0.84

1.06

1/29

13.95

13.52

10.84

13.00

12.45

14.37

11. "57

n _ 7ft

14 9"1

MP-EL

274.38

274 .73

273.68

272.63

267.52

265.15

262.77

277.93

277.93

275.34

272.34

272.34

273.41

272.35

•^7?. IS

1 1 ~) 1 3

W/L E L E V .

261.58

263.46

261.17

260.57

266.68

264.09

261.46

263.98

264.41

264.50

259.34

259.89

259.04

2 5 R . 7 R

25R.V7

"* 5 8 "

;,PAI;;ORMAN'DEAU ASSOCIATES, INC.


CLIENT O.K. Tool Comnzinv ' PROJECT KO. 56<

LOCATION Kilford, NH

NOTES Synoptic survey of wells prior to quality samples

WELL NO.

ow-i

OW-2

OK- 3

ot:-£

c_l

C-T

C _ T

X-la

M-lb

'.•-">

V-T j

K-3b

M-4

M-5a

M-^b

M-fi

i

DATE

11/7/83

11/7/83

11/7/83

1 i '!'?•>.

t 1 /- /O ">

1 1/7/83

11 f /p 7

11/7/83

11/7/83

1 1 /7 / fn

1 1 /" /p "5

11/7/83

11/7/83

11/7/B3

11/7/B3

i i y-7 /07

TIME

2:31 D

2.28 D

") - 2O n

-) -16 -

•3 . •»? -

3:31 p

' • ">c. p

10:45 A

10:43 A

11:4"? A

j-> . j^n p

12:04 p

12:48 p

1:16 n

1 -.19 p

J..C.1 p

HELD

14.00

13.00

13.00

1 "> ^0

15.00

15.00

13. on

1 ?n

15.00

16.00

16.00

16.00

i f i . n n

WET

1.96

2.35

1.81

?.34

1.66

2.23

T . l f i

T TO

3.63

2.55

3.23

3.10

. 1 , R R ...

DTW

12.03

10.65

11 .19

1] . i f iunderIn T f _ i

-0.1 f + )

-0 1 f ^ - i

13.34

12.77

9.°a

i \ on

11.37

13.45

12.77

12.90

Id 1? .,

KP-EL

274.38

274.73

27"1 .fio

^7?.< :,''

Tfi-7 CT

265.15

•760 7"1

277.93

277.93

• > ? = ; _ 34

•>•?•> }.!

272.34

273.41

272.35

272.33

T73.S4 _ _

W/L ELEV.

262.35

264.08

•>62..2Q

TA1 ^7

?CT -->

264.95

1p-> A"7

264.59

265.16

•><"•." ^0

^AO J4

260.97

259.96

25°. 58

259.45

-<-, o. . :r>

APPENDIX D

NAI TEST-BORING LOGS

•iPROJECT

O.K. T'.ol Co.REPORT OF BORING NO. _SHEET ^_ I OF 3DATE M-pc._cX F[LE __

BORING

FOREM*

NAI GEO

CO.wLOG!

CASING

SI7F: 4"

HAW

FAL

X

0.UJQ

10

15

20

25

30

j

Clarer.ee Kc-lti BORING LOCATION roster

nor Moodie f

<iT Dc-f'atale [•

SAMPLER

ROUND E)ATE STAf

LEV 275.6'

3T 9-26-S3 r

Realty bide. ;

DATE END

II

9-29-S3 '

GROUrO<VAT£R READINGS

TYPF s/«; (1TMFR.MFR: 300 . Ib. HAVMFR 300 !b

.: 30" FALL: 30"

CAS.BL

/FT.

SAMPLE 300=

NO.

9-1

q_->

PEN./REC

i . •;•

DEPTH

10-31.5

BLOWS /6"

10-27-11

HO-oZ"criguj ,s»°»g

boulderscobbles,gravel

lessbouldery

Upper Tiboulders

coboj.cs,

gravel,

sand

DATE D E f T M

9-29 11.74

9-29 12.33

C A S I N G AT STtBi^lZi ' lON TIME

M-la deecM-lb sr.allow

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

UNT* — V»Vrrr3 (31

ycllow-br & rod mottled f/c gravel,lit/ione f/c sand/silt as matrix,one lense vf/m sand, some silt(.2' thick).

UJ

o•z.

REMARKS1 HNu bkgd.«= .2 to .4 ppm.

naiiH-Q.UJO

35

40

45

50

3D

60

65

70

CASBL

/FT.

PROJECT0. K. Tool Co.•1i]_fr>rr? HH

SAMPLE

NO.

s-3

S-4

PEN./REC.

1.0'

1.0'

S-5

c-6

R-1

R-2

R-"?

1.0

s . n /i . o 'RQD=5'/4 '

S.OV4.81

s n • /4 6 '

DEPTH

40-41.0

45-46'

BLOWS/ 6"

47-82

51-62

55-56 47-83

60-fil . 5

6?. -67

67.5-72.

2.5-77.:

T7_in-5?

s

RQD=3.1/

4.8'

RQD=4 . 4 ' /4.6

<19t?^^WCX £ Lurh-0 o OrW a

Green

Till

pinkgranite

&granitegneiss

REPORT OF BORING NO. «-iSHEET 2 OF 3DATE Q-2=-pj_ PILE :^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

sample w

HNU, wash water 0 40.0'=bkgd.

Olive drab vf/f sand and silt, tr tlittle f/c gravel, extrenely compacsample moist. Lower Till.

Olive drab vf/m sand, and silt/claylittle to some v.c. sand/f. gravel,extremely compact sample moist.Lower Till.

Olive drai) vf/f sand and silt/clay,little to some vc sand/f gravel,extremely conpact. Sample moist.Till.

Similar to above, coarser fraction(v.c. sand/f. gravel) do-.inates.Till. HNu, S-5=bkgd

Relatively unweath'd pink granite f-pegmatite, fractured-most piecesroughly 3" long. HttU.wash water<? 60'=bkgd.

Pink and green coarse grained granit<& pegmatite. 1 or 2 near horizontalopen fractures. some ground-up mat '

Grey granite gneiss and pink & greerpegmatite as above. 2 high f breaks

UJt-O2

1

REMARKS:

naiD

EP

TH

75

80

CASBL

/FT.

PROJECT11 V Ti-.nl fn.

n.<i*or<3. KH

SAMPLE

NO.

R-4

PEN./REC

5.0' 74.8'

DEPTH

77.5-82.

BLOWS/ 6"

ROD=3 .8V4.8'

H£ zo'•-•'- ? LJuj

BOH

REPORT OF BORING NO. : '~-SHEET _i OFDATE ^-29-83 Fi(_r M -j

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

Pink granite S pegmatite, and grar.igneiss; 1 or 2 high £ ticht fracturseveral drillers breaks.

•jji—O

ec.

REMARKS:

nai3 0 R I N G CO.

F O R E M A N

PROJECT REPORT OF B O R I N G NO. :•:-?0. K. Tool Co. S H E E T 1 nF 2

Miifr,rAr T™ HATE <'-2:--J:3 FILE S69

Clarc-r.ce wdti B O R I N G LOCATION ^-v- °* Scuhtsan RiverDon Moodie G R O U N D E L E V 2 7 3 . 0 '

NAI G£OLOfi iST D. DeKatale r

CASING

SI7F: 4"

SAMPLER

)ATE STAf

TYPF- S/S nTHFR:

,T o.2y-?,3 pATE r w n 9-30-63

C - K ( O U N D v V A T £ P R E A D I N G SD A T E C E P T N C A S I N G A T S T A B i ^ IZ A T , O N T i « E

UAMUFP: 300 Ib HiMMFR 300 16

FtLLi 30" FALL- 30"

XHLUQ

5

10

15

20

25

30

CAS.BL

/FT

SAMPLE 300#

NO.

S-l

S-2

PEN./REC. DEPTH

5.0-6.5

BLOWS/ 6"

7-9-13

.

9-11-13

<t . • f iPOTSZ"

S&'Ss

Fill

boul-icrs,cobbles,gravel,sand

sand &gravel

boulders,cobbles{Upper

Ti l l?)

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

KNu, 0-5 during augerina = bkgd.

Dk reddish brown vf/m sand and silmetal shavings, f i l l .

HNu ? 12 ' , dur ing advance of corincbkgd.

begin drillina w/revcrt s roller bi

Note: driller has tried drill ingv/out nud, but water circulationcould not be nainta incd.

Lt yellow brown f/c gravcland c/vcangular sand. Sample wet.

HNu = bkgd.

UJt-0

R E M A R K S ^ HNu> bx<3d = o.2 ppm.

naia.UlQ

35

40

45

50

55

CASBL

/FT

PROJECT REPORT CF BORING NO. _>;-:>_0. K. Tool Co. SHEET ? OF 2.^:!ford, r:« DATE 9-29-83 Pn r ^fiq

SAMPLE

NO.

R-l

R-2

R-3

PEN./REC.

5.0 ' /3.0

5.0V2.5

S . O ' / J . O 1

D E P T H

38-43'

43-48'

A °.- c> ">. '

BLOWS/ 6"2^2"f-O § oliCO LJ

green

till

Lower

till

BOH

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

Estimated top of compact t i l l~34'

Cored boulders, ground cobbles aridolive-green till.

Cored boulders, ground cobbles.

Cored boulders, ground cobbles andgreen till (mixture of silt/clay,f sand, f/c gravel).

Roughly 0.6' of till recovered.

UJ\-Oz

R E M A R K S '

PROJECTo. r.. Tool Co.Milford. NK

REPORT OF BORING NOSHEET I OFDATE ir-3-g? FILE

BORING CO. Hoi*--! BORING LOCATION -^- n-

N A I GEOLOGI!

CASING

SI7F: 4"

HAW

FALt

DE

PT

H

D

10

15

20

25

30

,y D. DeNatale r

SAMPLER

)ATE STAFrr in - - ? -= -> [DATE END

GROUNDWATER R E A D I N G S

TVPE- S/S HTHPR:urp.- 300 Ib. HAMMCP 300 Ib.: 30" FALL: 30"

CAS.BL

/FT

SAMPLE 3oo#

NO.

S-l

PEN./REC.

12"/18"

DEPTH

30-31.5

BLOWS/6"

i

17-22-18

KO<oZ$trxsuj;:]1-00 JiCO °

siltysand

boulderscoables,grav.

cobble,gravel ,sandlayers

O f i T E D E P T M C A S I N O AT S T A B I L I Z A T I O N T I M E

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

H?;u, 5' to 25' = 4 0 ppm

It yellow-brown, stratified in thin( < 2 " > layers-vf/f sand layers,- f/cgravel, and m/v.c. sand, tr/littlesilt, (dense, wash water circulatedf u l l y ) ; silt layers HNu sanplc^bkc,

LJt-O

REMARKS:

I1-CLUJ

,Q

35

40

45

50

5b

60

65

70

naiCASBL.

/FT.

PROJECT REPORT OF B O R I N G NO. _.",-.o. y.. Tool Co. SHEET -^ op •>v.i1'--^ '-•" DATE i r _ 7 _ D T pii F

SAMPLE

NO.

S-2

S-3

C-&

S-5

S-6

S-7

PEN./REC

6"/18'

6"/18"

18" /18"

10"

DEPTH

35-3737-40

40-41.5

42-43

43-4545-46.5

50-51.5'

BLOWS/ 6"

16-19-4

3-3-3

5-5-5

54-57 i

i

60-61.5

66-67.5

70'-71.!

4-5-5

'

6-6-6

1 5-7-8

l~?-ostrcx £ oi^jen a

cobbles

cobbley^sand^fd

coarsesand,

andcrave 1

cpbbleylayer

coarse

sand,

f/m

sand

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

Cobbley zone (dr i l ler)Lt grey br vf/f sand and silt,(cuttings) KNu = bkgd.

Lt. grey-browr. angular m/vc sand/

f gravel, little c. gravel, tr silt.illerj HNu=bkgd.

Lt brown angular m/vc sand, littlef. gravel, tr silt; uniform.

KNu sample = 1 to 2

Lt brown angular m/vc sand, littleto some f/c cravel,

KNu sample - bkga.

(driller)

Lt. brown angular m/vc sand,tr f gravel, tr silt, uniform

KNu = .8 for sample

Lt. brown angular m/vc sand/f grave]

tr/littlc c gravel, tr silt.HNu = bkgd for sample.

Color banded, orange and It. yellowbrown vf/m sand, tr silt.

REMARKS:

nas.A.t-o.01o

75

80

85

90

95

LOO

L05

no

CASBL

/FT

PROJECT REPORT OF BORING NO0. Y. Tool To. SHEET 3_ OF •>

Mil ford, NH DATE 10-4-83 pp £ --,--

SAMPLE

NO.

R-1

s-

P.-2

P-3

P.- 4

R-ri

R-6

PEN./REC.

p,"/^ n1

0/0

4. 3V10.01

5.0' /5.0'

pon=i .*>''.

5.0 ' /5 .0 'RQD=5.0/5.

«; n ' /^ n 'RQD=5.0/5.

3.0' /3.0'RQD=3/3

DEPTH

75'

o-\ ' _Bfi '

86'-

86'-96'

BLOWS /6"

70/no advar

9S'-101V

L01-1063

|nfi-i n3'

LJ.1-114

<0^Z-n^PCCX 2 Uj"'t-o 5 cs^en Q

boulderscobbles

(boulder:eTill &

boulders

wc^'dp i n K

aran't*-

unweath'cpink &greygranites-

near-verticalnvDvementsurfaces

BOH

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

a few pieces of corase gravel,

cor^d boulders; gravel' crey-cree^isilt, tr/lit. f/vc sand sizes (tillas natri-'. (or.lv few inches tillrecovered) ; till overlies weatheredpink granite. HNu=1.0 for till sar.

Top 1.5': extremely weathered Sbroken pink granite - nuch breakagealong healed movement surfaces.Bottom: 3.5' unweathered pinkgranite and grey granite/granite gn«(qtz-feldspar-biotite) . Several

breaks — slickcn surfaces w/calcitemineralization; also many otherhealed S mineralized high £ to vert.sutures, si weathering along slickersurfaces.R-4 and R-5 : as above no drillersbreaks, fewer slick breaks, amountintact core increases w/depth.R-6 as above pink and grey granite4 or 5 slightly open high f movementsurfaces, calcite mineralization.

LI-C

1-

i

REMARKS:

nai PROJECT0. K. Tool Co.

REPORT OF BORING NO *iSHEET I OF 3_DATE ir-i?-a3 FILE -A

BORING CO. riArr.r-.-f. \<r,~ --i BORING LOCATIONF O R E M A N Don .Moodie CN A I G E O L O n i S T D. DeNatale r

CASING

SI7F: 3"

SAMPLER

3 R O U N D E

)ATE STAf

TYPF: S/S OTHFR:

LEV 970.6 '5T 10-10-83 DATE pN n

G R G U N D A A T E R R E A D I N G S& f i T E D E f T M C t S l N S A T STas :LIZAT,ON T I N

HflMMSTR: TOO Ib. HflMMFP TOO Ib

FALL: 30" FALL. 30"

It-Q.

Q

5

10

15

20

25

30

CAS

/FT.

SAMPLE 300=;

NO. PEN./REC. DEPTH

1

c-1

S-2

S-3

?n-?i s

2S-26.S

30-Ti .«;

BLOWS /6"

7-0-1 ?

4-4-6

1-3-4

K0-o2°

£5S^Sfill £Aeolian

boulderscobblesgravel ,sand

ir.ter-bcdded

sands £

gravels

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

HNu, bkgd = 0.3 cnm

Lt. brown f/vc and, little f. gravelHNu, S-l = bkgd. sample wet

Med. brown f/c gravel, and vf/m sandas matrix.Wu, S-2 = bkgd. sample wet

l<t. brown ang. f. gravel, sonc n/vcsand. HNU, S-3=bkgd.

U.1-2

REMARKS : Auger (3") first 15'. Use drilling mud to carry coarse sand/gravel to sur face .

I

PROJECT0. Y. Tool Co.;ilford.

REPORT OF BORING NOSHEET _2 OF _DATE IO-:'. F|LE 5-3")

CASBL/FT.

SAMPLE

NO. PEN./REC. DEPTH I BLOWS/6

<o

CO

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

35

40

45

50

55

60

70

S-4 35-36.5 4-3-4

S-5 40-41.5

S-6 55-46.5

.5-7 0-51.5

6-9-10

Lt. brown & red brown m/vc sand,some'f. gravel; layer of roundedcoarse gravel, little m/vc sar.d atbase.

Lt. brown rounded f/c gravel, andf/vc sand, tr silt.

KNu, S-5 = 1.6 ppT.

6-9-14

76

S-B

Lt brown rounded f/c gravel,m/vc sand, tr silt.

HNu, S-6 =1.6 pen.

Lt. brown & red brown rounded f/cgravel, some vf/vc sand, tr silt.

HNu, S-7 = 1.6 ppri.

4-/18" b4-68 5-6-4

boulderscobbles

Lt yellow brown & grey brown finelyinterlayered vf/f sands 5 silts.Uniform top 6" underlain by It. brow:stratified c/vc sand and f. gravel.

HNu, S-8 = to 3 ppm.

cobbles

REMARKS:

H-Q.LJO

7

8

80.

90

95

100

1CASBL

/FT

nai PROJtCl REPORT OF B O R I N G NO. _.:•:--_o. K. Tool Co. SHEET "> np ->.'•ilford. IJH DATF i r . _ i « - o t n, c

SAMPLE

NO

S-9

S-l

R-l

R-2

PEN./REC

18"/18"

3' 718"

6 - / 0 . 5 1

l.S'/l.O'

DEPTH

75-76.;

R5-86.5

BLOWS/ 6"

e-io-e

11-17-22

|94-100 j

100-101 5

<CD _.,t_->- TjlO

tri c wrfKU §0^CO C-

Uoper

Till

Lower

Till?

01-O.tM 1«-

BOH =101.5

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

Lt yellow brown & red Lrown (colorbanded) stratified rr/vc sar.d, ar.df/c gravel; also unit of uniform ~/~sand. HKu, S-9 = 2 pen

Lt grey-brown non-stratified f/cgravel, some vf/vc sand, tr/lit siltlayer of grey n. sand, sonie silt.

KNu, S-10 = to 2 ppT..

Lower tillby drillers estimate: stiff sidewalls, clean water, all waterrecirculated.

Few pieces of relatively unwea th 'dpink granite, vert fract surfacesw/slicks.

Broken pink granite, vert, slicks,core relatively unweath 'd , howeverbroken mostly by drilling.

1

L1-C

|

REMARKS:

nai PROJECT:. Tnnl rn

•'.ilford.

REPORT OF BORING NOSHEET L__ OFDATE 1Q-S-B3 FILE

Clarcr.seBORING CO.FOREMAN _NAI G E O L O G I S T D. DeNatale

Don HoodieB O R I N G LOCATION esst of r i a n t at rror^rG R O U N D ELEV. 27?.6'DATE START 1Q-5-33 DATE END

CASING

SIZE:

HAMMER:.

•ALL:

4"300

TYPE-

HAMWER.

FALL".

SAMPLER

2/2 OTHER:300 ib

DATS=EADINGS

CASINS AT

CAS.BL

/FT.

SAMPLE 300*

NO. PEN./REC. DEPTH BLOWS/6'SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

UJ

O

IS-1

10

I I

15

20

25

30.

S-2

S-3

S-4

fill

Aeolian;

5-6.5' 9-17-2;

'/A = okcd

Lt. brov.Ti f/c sand, and f/c gravelinaybe fill , sample dry.

20-21.5

25-26.5

OVA -

30-3 L,OVA =

ooulderscobbles

6-9-14

4-5-4

-i-l

S.-S-7

coarsesand,somef. gravt

Lt. brown c/vc sand and f gravel;also layer of It brown vf/f sand,little silt.

Lt. brown c/vc sand and f. gravel;

also layer of It brown vf/f sand,little silt.

Lt. brown m/vc sand, little f. nravc

REMARKS'-

naiXH-Q.UJQ

35

40

50

60

65

70

CASBL

/FT.

PROJECT REPORT OF B O R I N G NO >:--SHEET -. nF

Milf-rd "H D^TE IP- i -^- i Fll F

SAMPLE

NO.

S-5

PEM/REC.

£-6

S-7

12"/0"

DEPTH

40-41.5OVA =

50-51.5OVA =

BLOWS/ 6"

5-7-9bkad

6-7-9

bksd

55-56. 5j 7-11-17

60-61.5 29-54

<^_,0|5§ |

silty,sandy,gravel

(and

cobblesSboulders

Til'

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

Lt. brown n/vc sand, soine f . gravel.

Lt. brown c/vc sand and f. gravel,tr silt. grains angular to subangular.

Lt. brown angular c/vc sand, androunded f/c gravelw/hole cased to 60', material becomehard to sample-gravel, cobbles orboulders,piece of gravel @ bot of shoe?

k-(~

c

j

REMARKS: c<ving driven to 80' in order to avoid overnight caving (BOH=110)

nai PRGJtU

O. K. Tool Co.

1 f r.'->.. '.'H

REPORT OF B3RING NOSHEET 3 OF

DATE j:-f-=.?. FILE _

CASBL

/FT.

SAMPLE

NO. PEN/REC. DEPTH BLOWS/6'SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

90

95

OC

S-S 75-76.5 7-54

R-l 8.0V2. 3 82-90 cored

P-2 5 . 0 ' / E . O ' 90-95 cored5' of ir.t ct till

R-4

P.-5

5.0/5.0' 95-100 Ic-nrod

5.0/5.0'

5.0/5.Q

I

100-105

105-110

Lower

Till

woath'dcoarsewhitegraniteverticalslicksurfaces

Lt. oranqe cro'.'n £/c g rave l , scnevf/vc sand/si l t ratrix. 'Jcoer Till

coredboulders, cobbles, gravel; orange-brown fine sar.d/silt coats somepieces.

Olive drab till: dense silt/clay sflc sand, and gravel, ccbble,boulder sized. sample quite dry.Tine lar.ir.atior.s in silt/clay.

Sar.e as above, however no boulders

Ton 4 ' : till as above

Bottom I 1 : weath 'd coarse whitegranite (q tz , feldspar,tiotite) .several near vertical breaks w/slicksided surface (a little loss odrill water here)Keath'd coarse white granite as abov5 or 6 mid-open high * fractures(slicks), several Irillers breaksrock can be crumbled in hand, but isintact. driller loses some waterhere.

EMARKS:

mtePROJECT

. K. "V^l

Mi If era. !<H

REPORT OF BORING NO.SHEET _.-.; OFDATE I'-'-Bl FILE _

CASBL

/FT.

SAMPLE

NO. PEM/REC. DEPTH BLOV/S/61tn

SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONUJt-O

11C 5 .0 /5 .0 ' 110-115

115BOH

as .azove

REMARKS:

PROJECTO.K. Tool Co.

REPORT OF BORING NOSHEET I OFDATE JLr.-i--_5i FILE _

B O R I N G CO. Clarc-r.ce- weltiF O R E M A N Don Hoodie

BORING LOCATIONGROUND ELEV. 270.7

NAI GEOLOGIST p. pfVai-a DATE START 10-12-83 DATE END 1G"14-S3

CASING

SIZE- !1_HAMWtR. ___3IL2_

FflLL:. 30"

TYPE

HAMMER.

FALL:

SAMPLER

s/s OTHER:

Ib

30"

GROUND^ATER READINGSCaSINC AT STABILIZATION Tit.

CAS.BL.

/FT

SAMPLE 300*

NO. PEN./REC. DEPTH BLOWS/6 HO

CO

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

5-6.3' 3-3-9 boulderscobblesgravel,sand

KNu bkgd =0.3 cpm

Lt. brown f/in sand, sorr.e f/c gravesample dry. HNu, S-l = bkgd

10

20

25

30

S-2

S-3

24-25.=

30-31.5

HNU @ surface curing augcringto 1 ppm

2-2-3

2-2-3

Lt. brown in/vc sand, some f. gravesample uniform, wet.

HNU, S-2 = bkgd

Lt. brown m/vc sand, Jor«t f/cgravel tr silt , sample wot,

1INU « L-knd.

REMARKS: Auger to 20 ' . Drilling mud used a f t e r reading 20'

a PROJECT REPORT OF BORING NOSHEET - OFDATE !!•-'•>-*•* FILE _

o.UJo

CAS SAMPLE

/FT. NO. PEN./REC. DEPTH BLOWS/6SAMPLE DESCRIPTION o

2

40

60

65

70

S-4 IB"/

1 R" /

S-6

-1

40-41. 3-5-2

65.5-6

66-72

8-17-12

inter-beddedsand Sgravels

Lt. brown f/c gravel, and rr./vc sar.dtr silt.

HNU, S-4 = bkgd.

Lt. brown m/vc sand, little f. crave!HMJ, S-5 = bkgd.

cobbles

cobbles

UpperTill

HNU, wash water = bkgd.

by casing blowsbouldery

cobbley

Red brown & It brown coarse gravel,little to some vf/vc sand/f. gravel/silt. Upper Till. HNU, S-6 = bkgd

R-l cored boulder anc" aravel.

REMARKS:

naiD

EPT

H

80

85

90

CASBL

/FT.

PROJECT0. K. Tool Co.

Milfcrd. NH

SAMPLE

NO.

R-2

PEM/REC.

5'/5'

DEPTH BLOV/S/6"

86.5-91 5

!

i

j

•

<«^zoH-U § o^

Lower

Till

cinkgranite

BOH

REPORT OF BORING NO. •".-•-SHEET 3 OFDATE lo-l '-PI ni E - •

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

HSU, wash water = bkgd

grey tillunweth'd pink granite, 1 or 2 breaks

NO

TE

!

REMARKS:

APPENDIX B

SOBFLOOR SOIL

ANALYSIS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS BYRESOURCE ANALYSTS, INC. (RAI)

RAI(603) 926-7777 Resource Analysis, Incorporated

Box 4778 Hampton. A7/ 03M2

TO:

Mr. Dennis SassevilleNonnandeau Assocites25 Nashua RoadBedford, NH 03102

J

PO « OK Tool

Date Received: 9-15-83

Lab Number: 2673

Date Reported: 9-29-83

IDENTIFICATION

Soil Smples for OK Tool Subfloor

PARAMETERSAMPLE DESIGNATION

Volatile Organics Analysis. Please see attached sheets.

Results expressed In mgA. unless otherwise designated Less Than

Van Kouwenberg/Pease/Foster

ANALYST DIRECTO

METHODS: *$Undtrd Milhodt tor tht Eiamliutlon of Wtltr tnd W»»t»w«ur" Urn Edition or ethtr EM ipprovtd mdhodologitiunlcii olh«rv»l»» dtilgniitd.

RAI

Resource A nalysts. IncorporatedBox 4778 Hampton. \HQ384?

VOLATILE PRIOTITY POLLUTANT DETERMINATION

Lab No. 2673 Analyst DM7/SPVK Date' Analyzed 9-21-83 (603)926-7777

EPA Method 624 []EPA Method 5030

ASTM Method D 3781-79 []

Parameter

Acro le inAc rv lon i t r i l sBenzene6is(chloromethyl )etherBrorao f ormCarbon letrachlorideChlorobenzeneChlorotf ibromomethorieChloroethar te2 -Ch lo rov iny l c the rChloroform

Dichlorobroir.oroethaneDichlorodif luromethane1,1-Dichloroethane1 ,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2-Oichloroprooane1,3-OichloropropyleneCthylbenzeneMethyl bromideMethyl chlorideMethylene chloride1,1,2,2-IetrachloroethaneTet rach loroethy leneToluene1,2-trans-Oichloroethylene1,1,1-Irichloroethane1,1,2-IrichloroethaneIr ichloroethyleneTrichlorofluoromethaneVinyl chloride

Sample Designation

Al

12

Tr

Tr

A2

300

Tr

Tr

•

Bl

28

Tr

B2

3.4

Tr

M e t h o d D e t e c t i o n Uni t : 0,2 ug/g 0.2 ug/g 0.2 ug/g 0.2 ug/g

NOTES: results are expressed as ug/g. Ho entry denotes "not detected",

RAI

Resource A nalysts, IncorporatedBo\ 477S Hampton. \H Q3S4;


Lab No. 267? Analys t nT Date Analyzed g-21-83 (603)926-7777

EPA Method 624 []EPA Method 5030

ASTM Method D 3781-79 []

Parameter

AcroleinAcrylonitri lsBenzeneBis(chloromethyl)etherBromoforiBCarbon TetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChlorodibromoipethansChloroe thaneZ-ChlarovinyletherChlorofoririDichlorobroflome thaneDichlorodif lurome thane1 ,1-OichJoroethane1,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2-Dichloropropane1,3-DichloropropyleneCthylbenzeneMethyl bromideMethyl chlorideMethylene chloride1,1,2,2-Ietrachloroethaneletrachloroethyleneloluene1,2-trans-Dichloroethylene1,1,1-Irichloroethane1,1,2-IrichloroethaneIrichloroethyleneIrichlorofluoro!nethan«Vinyl chloride

Sample Designation

Cl

1 Q

C2

L 2

Tr

•

Mithod Detection Unit: Q.2 ug/g 0,2

NOTES: All results are expressed as ug/g. No entry denotes "not detected".

APPENDIX F

SUBSURFACE SOIL

AMALYSIS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS BYRESOURCE ANALYSTS, INC. (RAI)

RAl

Resource Analysts, IncorporatedBox 4778 Hampton, ,\H 038-12

TO:

r Mr. Alton StoneNonnandeau Associates25 Nashua RoadBedford, NH 03102

J

PO « 830185 (603) 92fh7777


Lab Number: 2796


IDENTIFICATION

Samples from project //569, OK Tool

SAMPLE DESIGNATIONPARAMETER

Volatile Organics Analyses by EPA Method 624. Please jee attached.

Acid and Base/Neutral Extractable Compounds Analysis. Please see attached.

Results expressed in mg/L unless otherwise designated < = Less Than

Russell n.ANALYST DIRECTOR

METHODS: "Slindird Mtlhodi for Iht Etimlntllon el W«l*r »nd W«it*w«t«r 1S1h Edition or elhtr EPA tpprevtd rrnihodologltiunleii elhtrwltt dtilgnittd.

RAI

BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS

Resource Analysts, IncorporatedBox 4778 Hampton. NH 038^

(603) 926-7777

DAT El 1-8-8 3 LAB {I 2796 ANALYST

IDENTIFICATION: Soil Samples

PARAMETER SAMPLE DESIGNATION

1C-SV 14D-SVAcenaphtheneAcenaphtyleneAnthraceneBenzidineBenzo (a) AnthraceneBenzo (a) Pyrene3,4-Benzof luorantheneBenzo (ghi) PeryleneBenzo (k) FluorantheneBis (2-Chloroetlioxy) MethaneBis (2-Chloroethyl) EtherBis (2-Chloro-isopropyl) EtherBis (2-Ethyl-hexyl) Phthalate4-Brornophenyl Phenyl EtherSutyl Benzyl Phthalate2- Chloronaphthalene4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl EtherChryseneDibenzo(a,h) Anthracene1 , 2-Dichlorobenzene1,3- Dichlorobenzenc1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene3,3'-Dichloroben7.idineDiethvl ohthalateDimethyl PhthalateDi-N-Butyl Phthalate2, 4-Dinitro toluene2,6-DinitrotolueneDl-N-Octyl Phthalate1 , 2-DiphenyihydrazlneFluornnthcnaFluoreneitexachlorobenzene^exachlorobutadieneHcxochlorocyclopentadlene •Hexachlorocthane

-r-1T*r"*'>-

continucd on reverse side

ACID EXTRACTABLE PRIORITYPOLLUTANT DETERMINATION

LAB 0 2796

SAMPLE DESIGNATION: Soil Samples

1C-SV

ANALYST RDF

UD-SVPARAMETER

2-Chlorophenol

2 , 4-Dichlorophenol

2 , 4-Dimethylphenol

4 , 6-DInitro-o-cresol

2 , 4-Dini trophenol

2-Nltrophenol

4-Nitrophenol

p-Chloro-m-cresol

Pcntachlorophenol

Phenol

2,4, 6-Tr ichlorophenolMethod Detection Limit

NOTES

0.2 - 5 ug/g 0.5 - 10 ug/g

All results are expressed as ug/g. No entry denotes "not detected". Method

Detection Limit varies with compound. Sample extraction and work up as per

SW 846 Section 3520.

Resource AnaJy-sts, Incorporated

RAIResource Analysts, Incorporated

Box 4778 Hampton, Mi OjC:2

(603) 926-7777

VOLATILE PRIOTITY POLLUTANT'DETERMINATION

Lab No. 2796 Analyst RDF Date Analyzed H-7-S3

EPA Method 624 [XI ASTM Method D 3781-79 [3

Parameter Sample Designation

Acro le inAcrylonitr i leBenzeneBis(chloromethyl)etherBromoforraCarbon letrachlorideChlorobenzeneChlorodibromomethsneCn lo roe thane2-ChlorovinyletherC h l o r o f o r mDichlorobronomethaneOichlorodif lurome thane1,1-Dichloroethane1,2-Oichloroethane1,1-Oiehloroethylene1,2-Oichloropropane1,3-Dichloropropylene[thylbenzeneMethyl bromideMethyl 'chlorideMethylene chloride1,1,2,2-letrachloroethaneletraehloroethyleneToluene1,2-trans-Oiehloroethylene1,1,1-Irichloroethane1,1,2-IrichloroethaneIrichloroethyleneIrichlorofluornmethaneVinyl chloride

1C-V 14D-V 16A-V

Trace

0.5Trace

•

75Trace

0.84

21A-V

0.10.051.1

Trace

Method Detection U«it: 0.2 ug/g 0.2 ug/g 0.06 ug/g 0.05 ug/g

M01tS;All results are expressed aa ug/g. No entry denotes "not detected". Sample

preparation and work up as per SW 866 Method 5030. Instrumental analysis aa per

EPA Metjod 624.


Box 4778 Hampton. .\'H 038-^2

(603) 926-7777

VOLATILE PRIOTITY POLLUTANT 'DETERMINATION

Date Analyzed H-7-83Lab No . 2796

EPA Method 624 K3 ASTM Method D 3781-79 []

Parameter

AcroleinAcrylonitrileBenzeneBis(chloroirethyl)etherBromofornCarbon letrachlorideChlorobenzeneChlorotJibromomethsneCht.oroe thane2-ChlorovinyletherChloroformOichlorobronomethaneOichlorodiflurome thane1 ,1-Oichloroethane1 ,2-Oichloroethane1,1-Oichloroethylene1,2-Dichloropropane1 ,3-OichloropropyleneEthylbenzeneMethyl bromideMcthjl chlorideMethylene chloride1,1,2,Z-IetrachloroethaneletrachloroethyleneToluene1,2-trans-Oichloroethylene1,1,1-Irichloroethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneIrichloroethylenetrichlorofluoromethaneVinyl chloride

Sample Designation

42AB-V

61

O."i2

«1AB-V

1 .•}

1.8

•

Method Oetictlon Unit: 0.05 ug/g 0.05 ug/g

KOTES; So entry denotca "not detected". AIL results are expressed as uy/y. Samnle

preperation and \rork up as per SW 846 Metho'd 5030. Instrumental analrsls as per.

EPA Method 624.

APPENDIX G

MONITORING WELLS

ANALYSIS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS BYRESOURCE ANALYSTS, INC. (RAI)

RAI

Resource A nalysts, IncorporatedBOM 4778 Hampton. \H 0384?

TO:

! B

Mr. Douglas De NataleNormandeau Associates25 Nashua RoadBedford, Hew Hampshire 03102

1

J

P0 * 830205


Lab Number: 2822


IDENTIFICATION

Samples from project 569 (OK Tool)

PARAMETERSAMPLE DESIGNATION

Volatile Organics Analysis by EPA Method 624

NOTE: Samples M7, M8 and M9 were for quality control only. They werespiked samples furnished by the N.H. WSPCC.

Results expressed In mg/L unless otherwise designated Less Than

1

_____ x-s, _____ —<^o rrr\^- ^ Russell n. vnoi..-./.!-., 11\uC^\/\^ \^*rei^Ll.

ANALYST " DIRECTOR1"

METHODS: 'Standard Mtlhodi lor Iht Ciamliullon of W«Ur and Wailtwaltf 1Slh Edition or othtr EPA *pprov*d mtthod«lo«tt»unltn othtrwli* dtilgnalad.

RAIpage

Resource Analysts, IncorporatedBox 4778 Hampton Mi O.'S-'"1

(603) 92£-7777


Lab No. 2822 Analys t RDF Date Analyzed 11-17-83

EPA Method 624 [] ASTM Method D 3781-79 []

Parameter

AcroleinAcry lon i t r i leBer-zeneBis(chlo rone thy] )etherBromoforaCarbon TetracnlorideChlorobenzeneChlorodibronomethsneCMoroethane2-ChlorovinjfletherChloroforn

0 ich lor ob ronome thaneOichlorof l i f luromethane1,1-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Oichloroethylene1,2-Oichloropropane1 ,3-OichloropropyleneCthy lbenzeneMethyl bromideMethyl chlorideMethylene chloride1,1,Z,2-tetr3chloroethanele t rach loroethy lenetoluene

1 ,2-trans-Oichloroethylene1,1,1-trichloroethans1,1,2-Irichloroethan8IrichloroethyleoeTrichlorof luoromethaneVinyl chloride

Sample Designation

Mia Mlb (20')

•

Mlb (35') M7

377032

Trnrp

"?P

Mi6Q

7267

94

8S

,

Method Detection Unit: 5 ug/L 5 ug/L 5 ug/L 5 ug/L

MTCS; All results are expressed as ug/L. No entry denotes "not dctetced". Trace de

compounds observed belov the method detection limit.

RAlResource Analysts, Incorporated

Box 4778 Hampton, \H 0384:

(603) 926-7777


Lab No. 2822 Analyst RDF Date Analyzedj,i-x7-g3

EPA Method 624 [tf ASTM Method D 3781-79 []

Parameter

AcroleinAcrylonitri leBenzeneBis(chloromethyl)etnerBromoformCarbon letrachlorideChlorobenzene

Sample Designation

M8

910

Chlorod ibromomethsne 12Ch lo roe thane2-Chlorovin_yJetherCh loro form JTrai-oDichlorobronomethaneDich lorod i f lurome thane1,1-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Oichloroettiylene1,2-Oichloroprooane1 ,3-OichloropropyleneCthylbenzeneMethyl bromideMethyl chlorideMethylene chloride1,1,2,2-!etrachloroeth3r,ele t rach lo roe thy leneloluene1, 2- trans-Oi chloroe thylene1,1,1-Irichloroethane1,1,2-IrichloroethaneIr ichloroethyleneIr ichlorof luoromethane

'Vinyl chloride

5109

147

6

11

M9

3670•n

Tri^fl

443675

7566

99

90

»

M2C20M

Trace

•

M2f31M

Trace

Method Detec t ion Llilt: 5 ug/L 5 ug/L 5 ug/L 5 ug/L

ROTCS: All results are expressed aa ug/L. No entry denotca "not detected".Trace denotes compound observed belov the method detection limit.

RAI

Resource A nalysts, Incorporated

Box 4778 Hampton. ,\'H 038-C

(603) 926-7777


Lab No. 2822 Analyst RDP Date AnalyzedjLl-17-83

EPA Method 624 fe] ASTM Method D 3781-79 []

Parameter

AcroleinAcrylonitr i leBenzeneBis(chloromcthyl)etherBromofof"Carbon Tetrachlor ideC'iloroben;eneChlorodibronofethsneChlcroethane2-Ch lo rov iny le therChloroformDichlorobronome thaneDichlorodi f luronethane1,1-Oichloroethane1 ,2-Oichloroethane1,1-Oichloroethylene1 ,2-Dichloropropane1 ,}-Dichloropropylene[thylbenzeneMethyl bromideMethyl chlorideMethylene chloride1,1,2,2-Ietrachloroethanelet rachloroethy lenetoluene1,2-tr3ns-Dichloroethylene1,1,1-Irichloroethane1,1,2-IrichloroethansIrichloroethyleneIrichlorof luoromethansVinyl chloride

Sample Designation

M3a(108')

6AOO

20

370

"

K3b(20')

370

1109

53

«

M3bf46')

Trace

490

25021

100

irace

M3b(72')

Tfarp

410

27014

88

irace

Method.Detec t ion Unit: 20 ug/L 5 ug/L 5 ug/L 5 ug/L

NOUS: All results expressed as ug/L. Ho entry denotes rtnot detected".

Trace denotes compound observed belov the method detection limit.

4 of 6


Box 4"& Hampton. \H 03842

(603) 9:5-7777


Lab No. 2822 Analyst RDF Date Analyzedll-17-83

EPA Method 624 DQ ASTM Method D 3781-79 []

Parameter Sample Designation

AcroleinAcrylonitri leBenzeneBis(chloromethyl)etherBromofora

Carbon letrachlorjdeChlorobenzeneChlorodibromomethsneChloroethane2-ChlorovinyletherCh lo ro fo rmDichlorobromomethaneOichlorodi f lurome thane1,1-Dichloroethane1 ,2-Oichloroethane1,1-Oichloroethylene1,2-Oichloropropane1,3-DichloropropylenetthylbenztneMethyl bromideMethyl chlorideMethylene chloride1,1,2,2-ietrachloroethanele t rach lo roe thy lenetoluene1,2-trans-Dichloroethylene1,1,1-trichloroethang1,1,2-lrichloroethaneIrichloroethylenetr ich lorof luorome thaneVinyl ctiloride

M4(20«)

4600

65

M4(57')

5500

50

•

MA(82') M5a(108'}

Trace

5200

30

Trace

2119

Trace

Hit hod bi tect ion Unit : 50 ug/L 50 ug/L 50 ug/L

ROtCS: All result!? qytj e^cpresaed a% ug/L. No entry .denQtea "not

Trace denotes compound observed below the detection limit.

b


Box 4778 Hampton, \H 03842

(503) 926-7777


Lab No. 2822 Analyst RDF ' Date Analyzedn-17-83

EPA Method 624 DrJ ASTM Method D 3781-79 []

Parameter

AcroleinAcryloni t r i leBsnjene8!s(chloromethyl)etherBromofo rdCarbon letrachlorjdeChlorobenzsneChlorodibromome thaneChloroethane2-ChlorovinyletherCnlorof oraDich lor obronome thaneDie hi orodiUurorae thane1,1-Oichloroethane1 ,2-Oichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2-Oichloropropane1 ,3-DiehloropropyleneEthylbenzene

.Methyl bromideMethyl chlorideMethylene chloride1,1,2,2-IetrachloroethaneTetrachloroethyleneToluene1,2-trans-Oichloroethylene1,1,1-Irichloroethane1,1,2-IrichloroethaneIrichloroethyleneIrlchlorofluoronethineVinyl chloride

:•_

** >

.. A.» ...

Sample Designation

M5b(20')

25,000

traceTrace

400

M5b(54')

Trace

35,000

200

500

•

•

M5b(80')

30,000

Trace

930

M6(20')

13,000

Trace

110

f

Method OertcUoh'limit;. 200 ug/L 200 ug/L.^. 250 ug/L 100 ug/1

BOIES; t-^g-CT-i.-- All results are expressed as ug/L.' Wo entry denotes "not detected"

trace denotes compound observed belov the method detection limit.

of 6


Box 477S Hampton. A// 03842

(603) 926-7777


Lab Analyst Date Analyzed 11-17-83

EPA Method 624 ASTM Method D 3781-79 []

Parameter

Acrolein*crylonitril«

Benzene8is(chloroi»ethyl)ether8roircfof8Carbon TctrachlcrideChlorobenzeneChlorodibromome thaneChloroethane2-ChlorovinyletherChloroformOiehlorcbromoffle thaneOichlorodif lurome thane1,1-0ichloroethan«1,2-Dichloros thane1,1-Oichloroethylene1 ,2-Dichloropropane1 ,3-OichloropropyleneEthylbemeneMethyl bromideMethyl chlorideMethylene chloride1,1,2,2-IetrichloroethaneTetrachloroethyleneToluene1 ,2-trans-OUhloroethylene1,1,1-lrichloroethjne1,1,2-Irlchloroethane(richloroethylentIricMorofluoromethanitVinyl chloride

." ,- t • *.v . " .

\;—.,.-... ..

Sample Designation

M6(A8r)

13,000

Trace

130

* '.'• '. . ' V

*- .

-

M6W)

18,000

Trac^c

200

r • " •'•*«••

.

sifQ)

.• ' :

•

S3fo>

•, ;

• - ..„«,. 100 ug/L --~, 200 ug/L-- ,-rv - 5ug/L_--- • 5 ug/ll'lll *",.!,".{,.' " . _.<,* ' UlC ' "' ' J- I ' ;'-

ug/L

Trace dendtes compound oleerved below the method detection limit.

r_au it THE pirtcT tSiu^T of, KM

, M5L IT2

T»t LST LIWE4 4WOWW W£T£ TaK-EW TEOM TutMJ 'PJ.-: OF o»- TOOL o: »j^ «IL»OBP, u u *£."ip«r e-i eostcr B TC^O. t_i • t<«o, utw

M M . JULY 21. "Ifc

H

naiDECEMBER 1983

ROUTE

Figure 1.2-2. O.K. Tool Company property, Milford, New Hampshire. O.K. Too?

LA "

\

J,uJ

o^2 m

oJt-

iVJ

•t.

LJXATIOW MAP

UGTEt:

i -ma r_4u it T»e etiULt or, n»i

2 TVC. UTI LlUfci &MOW/U WtPt Tt^BJ•'•_£.'! <X OK. TOOL CD. UL . MtLTOV, U U. '

«t ETStCT » TOPO. Cli • l^O, wt«i . NU , OULY 17. n7»

LEGEND

OM-1 MONITORING WELL

&OW-1 OBSERVATION WELL

• S-l WATER GAGING POINT

naiDECEMBER 1983

ROUTE

Figure 2.3-1. Locations of monitoring wells, observation wells, water gagt

— ' 111 *%

is

S3-J CO

uJi-

2VJ

vj S O

ie floor drain and geologic cross sections. O.K. Tool Report.

Icr.

Tit PlftCT QiLltT Of A T0*«u itrrtMtte , n»J VERTICAL.

K.T^" it uits -wwt. MSL r»n

1 TWt LCT uwfi 1UOVAJ IMtTt TWtEU rcau Tut*r_ai or OK. TOOL u> . IJL . KIL«»K>, u u •

13Ire(ex-

. KU . JULY IT,

_f|.= FILL

J.= WASTE

= NATURAL SOIL

= APPROX. EXTENTOF FILL/WASTE

SAMPLE POINTS LOCATED ATGRID INTERSECTIONS UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED= •

naiDECEMBER 1983

1 k> II II

ROUTE

Figure 3.2-1 Surface Soil Characteristics. O.K. Tool Report.

34

M ft K> 17 It. M 1 It tS tl

•0 CO

£T

CH

ELL M

. O3I

O2

E£tC

Cl(,1

M

tM

AN

JCM

E.S

TE.P

.

TY

PO

GR

AP

HIC

P

LA

N A

MD

UX

AT

IOM

OF

SAM

PUN

fe

PO

INTS

O.fc

. TO

OL

C

OM

PA

NY

IM

C.,

RO

UTE

. IO

I ,

MIL

RJR

P,

N.H

.S

CA

LE

l"

-5O

' CC

TO

BE

.C.,

/<f5

3

LCCiTIOKJ MAP

NOTES.

I TWIi r-lU It ft plCtiT CfcSULT of A

LOT LIUti iWOWW WtEt TW-ftJ FEW THl'r_« or on, TOCX. u> . la. tmmu>,uu'

»T C fctTT B TOPD t_i • IKO, WtW. MM . JULY Z7, Mlk

1.51 = OVA READINGS(ppm) in headspace

MAXIMUM READINGS FOR EACH LOCATIONREGARDLESS OF DEPTH

SAMPLE POINTS LOCATED AT GRIDINTERSECTIONS UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED = •

naiDECEMBER 1983

ROUTE

Figure 3.2-2 OVA Readings (ppm) in headspace for soil and waste samples,

35

TT»fc'1HE

-*•__

+

4

£

-

•

V.

'I

x-J

?;

OU1'LtV I

U

ss

rtiTnrtt70J

^JL »

'rr*.1.'10•«•

•%

h_*

K--

MM

•k. • IM-

>

?'

1

U.

rJi's

If5^1UT •»

>1000

3* *•

~^L-J .'. "'

f *" »H— • «

J

" r

l*Mlff

9

tM

u

1

•

T0TU. XI

uv

iAY4 CUTutT

17

IDOIL TA*J£j

•I

>iooro

9

1.5

- WAl- ft< M

""loo~. |

"..:--

r— ",x

rf1

>1000

nj WULW »LB

& ik 1

VMLWPD

*

\

fff' 'c

1.4"

TsV

r^V- [:

'i(7tS

"•••

" •^•^

1 \

^

(. V

' 1

€iY5 A'''

1.5f (JRiEE' rof n-

tff ti.0

~60u

^ 40

-

° - i . .1 —^-'

\

'. i • .

. .' *

1

'I

•"V

It

A1.5

ViTOJ ' «l

r»"»

, 2

>iodo

1.4

%\1\

^>\ • f fV .»\"

\

— e:

5 I

•0t

tlfv _

s\« «

\!a-uw

/* "•r

/^^~

u. niuu ix>t

1 .2

Jt

fc' I/ JH77

A

f

tl ZJ77

«. ZT«

. - - - n

\-A~—

i.t CTJJtE TIO

fr /

1 i '

«•* iff

i r

9

'' 1^EL iiit- U-fttO

*t tt, to. ratIL.J'07

I 1

V

!3

•-

K""

" > S\

— • • • •

.B

3 1

tte

'4

•

, fr

\ . 1

\-^<

f

4

•C tuU'U'

EglC

C

. M

ITC

WE

.LL

L.L

.t>

.!(r

Z.

MIL

R2K

D 6

T£t£

TM

AN

CW

tST

aK ,

N.M

.0

3IO

2

TO

PO

GR

AP

HIC

P

LA

N A

MD

LC

CAT

IOM

OF

6A

MP

UW

G

PO

INTS

O.K

.. T

CX

3L

CO

MP

AN

Y

IMC

., R

OU

T6.

/O

I ,

MIL

FC

RP

, N

.H.

SC

ALE

l"-5

0'

CC

TO

BE

R.,

HB

3

Tool Report.

LOATIOM MAP

TI« nrtcT BKULT of *iu airrt*<&E» ,

i TMIJ nsuevtrPiTUM 14

1 TXt LOT LUJE4 4MOWW W£K TiX-EU FCMlt TUtPU6»J ' r_« Of OK. TOO. 0> . ILJC. . HILRSfP, U U '

p »T ecfttrr B TOIO. ri-t • ii<o, wtiw. KU-. OUUY zi, n't

LEGEND

© M-l MONITORING UELL

&OW-1 OBSERVATION WELL

• S-1 WATER GAGING POINT

GROUND WATER— 262— ELEVATION CONTOUR

GROUND WATERFLOW DIRECTION

naiDECEMBER 1983

ROUTE

Figure 3.3-1. Water Table Elevation Map for the Overburden Aquifer on Septc-

1983. O.K. Tool Report.

ITAU 14 7U« tarfcCT EfcSULT OfuouiTto * atrrtwati , nti

P^TJM 14 UiVi-WK*. Mil. nil.

2 T^L LOT Lwti »ue>w/M iveet TU^EU rtaw rut-r_ti or on. TOOL co, uc.. MILFOCD, uu *

> treter B TODO. rt c • uio, wtvw, NH.. JULY 27, H)»

LEGEND

o H-l MONITORING WELL

AOW-1 OBSERVATION WELL

• S-l WATER GAGING POINT

—262GROUND WATERELEVATION CONTOUR


naiDECEMBER 1983

ROUTE

Figure 3.3-2. Water Table Elevation Map for the Overburden Aquifer on Octo!

<jim.trlilt r..V H70J

v/iJ- v- S>-i vil r«, d) -0

viJ

li

u)»-Z3

VJZ

h

'83. O.K. Tool Report.

LKiTIOM MAP

MOTEt:

n_4U It Tie

CK.T1X

EiULT OF Aitno-sti , nt>

&L nj1.

T U7T LIUE4 SMOWM INfft T£«-Eil rC^U TUt*r-_£T <X OH. TOOL CO. IUC. . KILtOlD, U U '

»t z^tcr » TOPO, tu. • tuo, wtw80SJ3U. MM . JULY Z1, ">»

LEGEND

OM-1 MONITORING WELL

AOW-1 OBSERVATION WELL

WATER GAGING POINT• S-l

.262-GROUND WATERELEVATION CONTOUR


naiDECEMBER 1983

ROUTE

Figure 3.3-3. Water Table Elevation Map for the Overburden Aquifer or. Octo1

.->

xJJ

K>, O

uJi-

2VJ

US O

>B3. O.K. Tool Report.

LOCATIOW WAP

I TUli riAU K, 11C tXtU1 BEiULT OF Aa)upu:TfcP HI itrrtMMR , MH

LOT LUJti JUCVAJ WEJTt TAW.BJ rtJK TUC• rj,i of o». toot u> . to. . nctforo, u u •

»T emrr » TOTD. <^_i. • tut>, wtwM. . JULY Ii, nJfc

O M-l

AQW-1

• S-l

^.262-

LEGEND

MONITORING WELL-

OBSERVATION WELL

WATER GAGING POINT

GROUND WATERELEVATION CONTOUR


naiDECEMBER 1983

ROUTE

Figure 3.3-4. Water Table Elevation Map for the Overburden Aquifer on Mover

«."* IST

-IK p—> lli i, O) -O

• I *-U

J23

vJ»-

aVJ

_v) S 0

, 1983. O.K. Tool Report.

1 Trl*. \O\ CUJB 1MCWU IVUS TAK-EiJ FCOW TUtn-au *rji-! o* c+~ TOOL co . «JL . KU-IOIP, w u •

. NX . JJLT zi,

OM-1

AQW-1

• S-1

. 262—

LEGEND

MONITORING WELL

OBSERVATION WELL

WATER GAGING POINT


GROUNDFLOW

WATERDIRECTION

nasDECEMBER 1983

ROUTE

Fiqurc 3.3-6. Potentiomctric Surface Elevation for the Bedrock Aquifer on Oc

S-3

jv- 2, a) -O

3 Q

ui

H iasl

VJ

a^.8<!l -I -

, 1983. O.K. Tool Roport.

(JOTEt:i -mis ruivj H. TIC pirtiT EBULT or A

&iountp <u itrttfc>ti , nt>IUM-UM, MIL i«

t TWI LOT LUft luoww wut Tav-EU rtaw rutPUAU 'r_ii or or- TOOL <c uc . MU.FOU), uu '

P >T C2UTT • TOOD, t i • UX>, WtW, N U . OULY I', rut.

GM-1

S-l

LEGEND

MONITORING WELL

OBSERVATION WELL

WATER GAGING POINT



naiDECEMBER 1983

WILTS*-' ROUTE

o>o

Figure 3.3-7. Potentiometric Surface Elevation for the Bedrock Aquifer on K

7, 1983. O.K. Tool Report.

jlU ft T>C tXKCf SESULT Ct AC0WPIXTW M StrTtWBE.1 , HM

UtW. -Utri, MiL OJ1.

1 1X1 LOT LUE1 1UWWW WEZC T&K.EU rtOU TMCn-au -r^Ai or OK. TOOL <D . uc . MIUOEO. u it *natrtf »T eottcr » TOCO. ZLi • no. wt»/BOU3U. NU , JULY IT, H7k.

©M-1

OMW-I

A ow-i

• s-i

ND

TR

LEGEND

MONITORING WELL (OK TOOL SITE)

MONITORING WELL (HITCH1NER MFG.)

OBSERVATION WELL

WATER GAGING POINT

NOT DETECTED

TRACE

AVERAGE GROUND WATER FLOWDIRECTION, FALL 1983

CONCENTRATIONCONTOUR

<^

naiDECEMBER 1983

WX.1M ROUTE

oCD

5CO

25c

Figure 3.3-8. Concentration of Totrachloroethylene in Overburden Aquifer (

.K. Tool Report.

L2J1TIOM MAP

MCTEt:

i TUIJ IVAU it ue pirfxi BE&ULT of AIU lLr7tMC.il KM.

i. Wit nzv

l ivt un LW64 luowu »vtrt TUM-EU rejw rueruAU • r_&T or OK. TOOL 03 , me . MILK>U>, u u '

BY eseerr B TOPD. « c. • tw>, utw. MU . JULY 27. MTk.

OM-1

AQW-1

• S-l

NO

LEGEND

MONITORING WELL

OBSERVATION WELL

WATER GAGING POINT

NOT DETECTED

naiDECEMBER 1983

ROUTE

Figure 3.3-9. Concentration of Tctrachiorocthylene in three Bedrock Mo-

>l

56

jv- Q_j vvi^O

dfe2

V- £ii 2 aS

a§S2^<

c

laJ £0

oJh-n

\J

OS 0= o^

ells (ppb). O.K. Tool Report.

transmittal letter, copies of pertinent records … · lacoste c, ronberg gravity -eter which is...

Documents