Mental Health Transformation Project

June 16, 2006

Transformation Work Group

Introduction and Logistics• Welcome• Logistics• The purpose of today’s meeting is to consider

and adopt the strategies for implementing the identified outcomes

Today’s Agenda

10:00 – 10:15 Welcome and Next steps 10:15 – 10:30 Employment and Housing Goals for

CMHP10:30 – 11:30  Resource Inventory / Needs Assessment 11:30 – 12:00 Lunch12:00 – 3:45 Presentation & Adoption of Strategies3:45 – 4:00 Next steps

OVERVIEW

BACKGROUND

MHTP Overview

SUBCOMMITTEESHold public input meetingsDevelop priority outcomes

TASK GROUPS identify strategies, initiatives, and alternatives to reach outcomes

DRAFT CMHP7/15

Final Comprehensive Mental Health State Plan

09-30-2006

Transformation Process: Year One of Implementation

TWG prioritizes outcomes and strategies

Final Review by Governor’s Office

Resource Inventory5-15-2006

Needs Assessment

5-15-2006

`

OUTCOMES

STRATEGIES

You Are Here

Schedule OverviewSchedule Overview

Jan Feb March April May June Aug July Sept

Public Input21 Subcommittee sessions

20 Listening sessions

Surveys distributed statewide

TWG Reviews/ Approves Outcomes

Subcommittees Prioritizes Outcomes

Task groups prepare strategies

TWG Reviews/ Prioritizes strategies

Sterling prepares draft CMHP

RDA conducts needs assessment and Resource Inventory

CMHP

DRAFT

TWG reviews draft CMHP

Submit CMHP to Governor

Deliver CMHP to SAMHSA

Task groups share strategies with subcommittees and modify if needed

Jan Feb March April May June Aug July SeptJan Feb March April May June Aug July Sept

Public Input21 Subcommittee sessions

24 Listening sessions

Surveys distributed statewide

TWG Reviews/ Approves Outcomes

Subcommittees Prioritizes Outcomes

Task groups prepare strategies

TWG Reviews/ Prioritizes strategies

Sterling prepares draft CMHP

RDA conducts needs assessment and Resource Inventory

CMHP

DRAFT

CMHP

DRAFT

TWG reviews draft CMHP

Submit CMHP to Governor

Deliver CMHP to SAMHSA

Task groups share strategies with subcommittees and modify if needed

Employment and Housing GoalsPresentation

Lynn Davison & Lynnae Ruttledge

Resource Inventory / Needs AssessmentPresentation

Liz Kohlenberg Eric BrunsJudy Hall Dennis McBride

• Each Task Group will be presenting their work to the TWG.

– The TWG will be asked to decide whether the task groups’ proposals are accepted for inclusion into the CMHP

– Discussion should focus on whether the TWG agrees with the strategies and/or the principles. Key questions include:

• Are these the “right” strategies and/or principles? Is this an appropriate framework?

• Are there any specific strategies that we cannot live with?• Are there others that may be needed?

Presentation of Strategies

• Each of the task groups developed a set of overarching, or broad-based principles as a framework for developing their specific strategies.

• These will be highlighted by each of the task groups and if approved will guide their work in subsequent years

• Other strategies are specifically geared towards one or more of the outcomes approved at the April 21st TWG meeting

• Each of the Task Groups believes that their work has just begun

• The timelines for developing the first cut were very aggressive. In some cases, there was not enough known to form detailed strategies.

Presentation of Strategies

Task Group Presentations

Evidence-, Consensus-Based/Promising and Emerging

Practices Task Group

Chair: Mark Snowden, MD, MPHAssociate Professor

UW Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

Decision Point• Does the TWG accept the scope of the Task Group’s

strategies as set forth in their definitions of evidence-based, promising, and emerging practices, and system strategies?

• Does the TWG accept the strategies as proposed by the ECBPEP Task Group?

• Are there any strategies that the TWG cannot accept?• Are there other strategies that should be included?

Evidence- Consensus-Based, Promising, Emerging Practices

Fiscal Task Group

Chair: Rick Weaver, MAPresident/CEO

Central Washington Comprehensive Mental Health

Decision Point• Does the TWG accept the approach proposed by the

Fiscal Task Group to defer detailed strategies and instead define principles to help determine detailed strategies in Year 2 when more information is known?

• Are these the right principles?

Fiscal Task Group

IT Task Group

Co-Chairs: Katie Weaver Randall, MA

Research Associate, Mental Health Division Washington Institute for Mental Illness and Research

Liz Kohlenberg, PhDDirector, DSHS Research and Data Analysis Division

Decision Point• Does the TWG agree that the state should adopt

strategies that will support linked and/or integrated data across systems?

• Does the TWG agree that the state should further explore ways to make data from multiple providers about encounters with individual consumers, available to those consumers and their multiple providers and case managers, "on the ground" in "real time"?

IT Task Group

Decision Point• Does the TWG agree that the state should further explore the

feasibility of a Global Consumer Information Center consumer level record for both public and privately funded mental health services?

• Does the TWG agree that the state should further explore the other strategies as proposed by the IT Task Group? Are there any strategies proposed that the TWG would prefer we not pursue at this time? Are there other IT strategies that should be explored?

• Does the TWG want a more detailed IT implementation proposal -- with resource estimates and an implementation timeline? When do they need that?

IT Task Group

Cultural Competence Task Group

Chair: Emilio Vela, Jr. Treatment and Prevention Policy AnalystDivision of Alcohol and Substance Abuse

Cultural CompetenceDecision Point• Does the TWG accept the proposed overarching strategy to

establish an Interdepartmental Coordinating Council on Cultural Competence?

• Does the TWG accept the supporting strategies as proposed by the Cultural Competence Task Group?

• Are there any strategies that the TWG cannot accept?• Are there other strategies that should be included?

Evaluation Task Group

Chair: Judy Hall, Ph.DResearch Director

Mental Health Division, HRSA

Evaluation

Decision Point• Does the TWG accept the Evaluation Recommendations

proposed by the Evaluation Task Group?• Are there any of these recommendations that the TWG

cannot accept?• Are there other recommendations that should be

included?

Social Marketing

Social Marketing

Chair: Heidi KellerDepartment of Health

Social Marketing

Decision Point• Does the TWG accept the research and design approach

proposed by the Social Marketing Task Group?• Are there any other target behaviors that the TWG

believes should be incorporated?• Are there other change agents who should be included?

Wrap Up

Questions?

Wrap Up• Sterling Associates will work with the Project Team to

prepare the Comprehensive Mental Health Plan (CMHP)– The draft plan will be posted for public viewing

• August 1: TWG members will receive the draft CMHP for review

• August 4: TWG will meet to make final modifications and approve the CMHP– Once approved, the CMHP will be submitted to the Governor’s

office for review

• September 30: CMHP due to SAMHSA

Wrap Up

• Final comments or questions• Please complete and return the evaluation

Thank you!