transfer taxes-sample questions
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
1/24
TRANSFER TAXES
*** 87. Don Cesar Soriano, a Spanish national, died on September 5, 2000 in his
villa at Lucerne, Switzerland. He executed a will before his death leaving all of his
properties to his girl friend Maricel Montano, a Filipino residing in Bruge, Belgium.
The girl friend decided to bring the remains of Don Cesar, who was a resident of thePhilippines from 1935 up to 1997 to the Philippines for burial because that was his
wish as most of his friends are still living in the Philippines. She spent about
P750,000.00 for funeral expenses. On September 17, 2000 Maricel met you in
Hongkong and engaged your services in order to settle the estate of Don Cesar in
accordance with the will which was properly probated in Switzerland. She presents
to you an inventory of the properties left by Don Cesar with their corresponding
values as of September 5, 2000, Don Cesars date of death. The villa in Switzerland
US$1 million; an apartment building located in New York, US$5 million; a hacienda
in Davao P25 million but the present valuation is now P40 million because of road
constructions which enhanced the value of the property; US$15 million the value of
life insurance proceeds from an insurance taken out by Don Cesar on his own life
designating his estate as beneficiary from the Canton Swiss Insurance at Canton,
Switzerland; P25 million proceeds of life insurance taken by Don Cesar on his own
life from Philamlife Insurance in the Philippines payable to Maricel as irrevocable
beneficiary; outstanding bank balance with Philippine Bank of Commerce in the
amount of P5 million with Nanette as his and/or co-depositor. Shares of stock of a
Hongkong company but managed from the Philippines and a P15 million apartment
located in Manila, Philippines which he donated to his close friend on April 25, 1989
subject to the condition that the friend remits to Don Cessar all the rentals of the
property during the lifetime of Don Cesar.
a. What should be reported as part of Don Cesars gross estate and what deductionsare allowable to determine his net estate? Explain.
b. Are the proceeds of the P25 million life insurance to be considered as part of the
gross estate of Don Cesar or Maricels income? Why?
c. Supposing Maricel wants to withdraw the P5 million from the bank, what advise
should you give her?
d. Is Maricel being the sole beneficiary liable for the payment of the estate taxes?
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
a. Since Don Cesar was a non-resident decedent who at the time of his death was
not a citizen of the Philippines, only that part of the entire gross estate which is
situated in the Philippines, shall be included in his taxable estate. (Sec. 85, NIRC of1997) The problem is clear that Don Cesar resided in the Philippines only from 1935
to 1997.
Specifically, the part of his gross estate which are situated outside of the Philippines
and excluded from the taxable estate are the US$1 million villa in Switzerland, the
US$5 million apartment building in New York, U.S.A., and the proceeds of the US$15
million life insurance from the Canton Swiss Insurance.
The following properties are part of his gross estate because they are situated in
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
2/24
the Philippines. The P25 million Davao Hacienda, the P5 million bank balance with
the Philippine Bank of Commerce, the shares of stock in the Hongkong corporation
and the P15 million apartment.
The shares of stock have acquired a business situs in the Philippines because the
foreign corporation is managed from the Philippines hence, includible as part of Don
Cesarss gross estate.The P15 million apartment is part of the gross estate because it was transferred in
contemplation of death. Don Cesar has retained for his life the enjoyment of the
fruits of the property. (Sec. 85 (B), NIRC of 197)
b. The proceeds of the P25 million life insurance is neither part of the gross estate
nor income to Maricel. The proceeds are not part of the estate because the
beneficiary is not the estate of Don Cesar, his executor or administrator and the
designation of the beneficiary is irrevocable. (Sec. 85 (E), NIRC of 1997) The P25
million is not also income to Maricel because life insurance proceeds paid to
beneficiaries upon the death of the insured are exclusions from gross income. (Sec.
32 [B] {1}, NIRC of 1997)
c. I would advise Maricel to first secure a certification from the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue that the appropriate estate taxes were already paid. If the amount
to be withdrawn does not exceed P20,000.00, she should secure an authorization
from the Commissioner even if said taxes have not yet been paid. (2nd par., Sec.
97, NIRC of 1997)
d. If Maricel is at the same time the executor or administrator of the estate, then
she is primarily liable. If she is not the executor or administrator, then being the
beneficiary, she is subsidiary liable to the said executor or administrator. (Sec. 91
[C}, NIRC of 1997)
NOTES AND COMMENTS: The valuation to be used is the valuation at the time of the
decedents death NOT at the time of filing return or payment of estate tax.
*** 88. The NIRC of 1997 allows as a deduction from the gross estate of a citizen or
resident of the Philippines judicial expenses of the testamentary or intestate
proceedings in order to arrive at the net estate subject to estate taxes. [Sec. 86 (A)
(b)]. Are notarial fees paid for the extrajudicial settlement of the estate as well as
attorneys fees for the guardian deductible from the gross estate as judicial
expenses ? Explain briefly.
SUGGESTED ANSWER: Yes. The notarial fee paid for the extrajudicial settlement is
clearly a deductible expense since such settlement effected a distribution of the
estate to his lawful heirs, Similarly, the attorneys fees for a guardian of theproperty during the decedents lifetime should also be considered as a deductible
administration expense. The guardian gives a detailed accounting of decedents
property and gives advice as to the proper settlement of the estate, acts which
contributed towards the collection of decedents assets and the subsequent
settlement of the case. (Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Court of Appeals, et
al., G.R. No. 123206, prom. March 22, 2000)
NOTES AND COMMENTS: Judicial expenses are expenses of administration.
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
3/24
Administration expenses, as an allowable deduction from gross estate of the
decedent for purposes of arriving at the value of the net estate, have been
construed to include all expenses essential to the collection of the assets, payment
of debts or the distribution of the property to the persons entitled to it. In other
words, the expenses must be essential to the proper settlement of the estate.
Not deductible are expenditures incurred for the individual benefit of the heirs,devisees or legatees. Thus, in Lorenzo v. Posadas, the Court construed the phrase
judicial expenses of the testamentary or intestate proceedings as not including
the compensation paid to a trustee of the decedents estate when it appeared that
such trustee was appointed for the purpose of managing the decedents real
property for the benefit of the testamentary heir. In another case, the Court
disallowed the premiums paid on the bond filed by the administrator as an expense
of administration since the giving of a bond is in the nature of a qualification for the
office, and not necessary in the settlement of the estate. Neither may attorneys
fees incident to litigation incurred by the heirs in asserting their respective rights be
claimed as a deduction from the gross estate. (Commissioner of Internal Revenue v.
Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 123206, prom. March 22, 2000)
89. In 1999 Atty. Chari T. Able made the following donations:
a. P 250,000.00 alumni association of her alma mater, the University of the
Philippines;
b. P350,000.00 to Quezon City High School, a public school located in Kamuning,
Quezon City;
c. P500,000.00 as prize to M. Alakas, a Filipino athlete who garnered the gold medal
in an international weight lifting contest held in Moscow which contest was
sanctioned by the Philippine Weightlifting Association, the national weightlifting
association;d. P50,000.00 to a friend she has not seen for a long time;
e. On December 31, 1998 she donated one-half of her parcel of land
worth P2.5 million to her son, and on January 2, 1999, she donated the re-
maining one-half of the same parcel of land to the same son; and
f. P750,000.00 to the Holy Order of Friars, a religious congregation
to be used for the construction of a church.
Atty. Chari T. Able derives her income solely from the practice of her profession. a)
Should she be subject to donors taxes on the above donations ? b) Is she entitled to
any exemptions ? c) Should the donation made to her son be treated as a single
donation because only two days separate the donations ? d) Should she be allowedto deduct the donations from her income derived from the exercise of her
profession ?
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
a. Atty. Able is subject to the payment of donors taxes on the following donations:
1) P250,000.00 donation to the alumni association of the University of the
Philippines because the alumni association is not a school; 2) The P50,000.00
donation to a friend (not related to Atty. Able by consanguinity within the fourth
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
4/24
degree) which is considered as a donation to a stranger hence subject to a donors
tax of thirty percent (30%) of the net gift; and 3) the donation to her son.
b. She is entitled to an exemption on the first P100,000.00 of the 1999 net
donations. Furthermore, the following donations are exempt from donors taxes: 1)
P250,000.00 donation to Quezon City High School as the same is considered as a
donation to the government; 2) the donation to M.A. Lakas under the provisions ofRepublic Act No. 7549, as it is clear that the conditions in the said law are met; and
3) the donation to the religious congregation because it is evident that the whole
amount is not to be used for administration purposes.
c. The donation to the son should be treated as separate donations because donors
taxes are computed on the basis of net gifts made during a calendar year.
d. The donation to M.A. Lakas is allowed as a deduction because it is a prize to an
athlete in an international sports tournament held abroad and sanctioned by the
national sports association. (Sec. 1, R.A. No. 7549) Also allowed as a deduction is
the donation to Quezon City High School.
90. On September 29, 1989, former President Marcos died in Hawaii, U.S.A. A
special audit team created to conduct investigations and examinations of the tax
liability of the late president disclosed that the Marcoses failed to file a written
notice of death of the decedent and an estate tax return in violation of the NIRC.
The Commissioner of Internal Revenue thereby caused the preparation and filing of
the Estate Tax Return for the estate of the late president. On July 26, 1991, the BIR
issued a deficiency tax assessment against the estate which were served
constructively upon Ms. Imelda Marcos (through her caretaker Mr. Martinez) at her
last known address at No. 204 Ortega St., San Juan, M .M.
The deficiency tax assessment was not protested administratively by Mrs. Marcos
and the other heirs of the late president. On February 22, 1993, the BIRCommissioner issued twenty-two notices of levy on real property against certain
parcels of land owned by the Marcoses - to satisfy the alleged estate tax, among
others.
Other notices of levy were made until the properties were sold at public auction,
with the lots being forfeited in favor of the government for lack of bidders.
The validity of the BIR's actions is now raised.
SUGGESTED ANSWER: The approval of the court sitting in probate, or as a
settlement tribunal over the estate of the deceased is not a mandatory requirement
for the collection of the estate. The probate court is determining issues which are
not against the property of the decedent, or a claim against the estate as such, butis against the interest or property right which the heir, legatee, devisee, etc. has in
the property formerly held by the decedent.
The notices of levy were regularly issued within the prescriptive period.
The tax assessment having become final, executory and enforceable, the same can
no longer be contested by means of a disguised protest. (Marcos, II v. Court of
Appeals, et al., 273 SCRA 47)
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
5/24
91. Mr. Fil I. Pino, a Canadian citizen and a resident of Ontario, Canada, sends a gift
of US$20,000.00 to his future daughter-in-law who is to be married to his only son in
the Philippines. The marriage actually took place on the date the gift was received.
a. Is the donation by Mr. Pino subject to tax ? Explain. Would your answer be the
same if Mr. Pino is a Filipino citizen but is a non-resident ?
b. What is the tax consequence, if any, to the Mr. Pinos daughter-in-law ?SUGGESTED ANSWER:
a. Yes, because a non-resident alien is exempt only from the payment of donors
taxes if his gifts are made to or for the use of the National Government or any entity
created by any of its agencies which is not conducted for profit, or to any political
subdivision of the said Government.
He is subject to tax because the gift was not made in favor of an educational and/or
charitable, religious, cultural or social welfare corporation, institution, foundation,
trust or philanthropic organization or research institution or corporation which does
not use more than 30% of the donation for administration purposes.
If Mr. Pino was a non-resident Filipino my answer would still be the same.
b. None. the amount should not be considered as part of her income as the same is
one of the exclusions, Neither is there any donors tax due from her because the tax
is to be paid by the donor and not the recipient.
RETURNS
92. What is the probative value of income tax returns as evidence ?
SUGGESTED ANSWER: Income tax returns being public documents, until
controverted by competent evidence, are competent evidence, are prima facie
correct with respect to the entries therein. (Ropali Trading v. NLRC, et al., 296 SCRA
309, 317)NOTES AND COMMENTS: While the above cited case is a labor case, the author
suggests that the same could find application in taxation as well.
93. Bill and Hillary are married to each other. Bill is employed as a government
employee deriving annual gross compensation income amounting to P120,000.00
while Hillary derives income from selling baby dresses. Her monthly income
fluctuates, but for the year 2000, she grossed P500,000.00. The couple have no
children. Are they allowed to file separate income tax returns ? Why ?
SUGGESTED ANSWER: No. As a general rule, they are not allowed to file separate
returns as only married individuals who are both earning purely compensationincome are allowed to file separate income tax returns.
Section 51 (D) of the NIRC of 1997 provides that, Married individuals, whether
citizens, resident or non-resident aliens, who do not derive income purely from
compensation shall file a return for the taxable year to include the income of both
spouses, but where it is impracticable for the spouses to file one return, each
spouse may file a separate return of income but the returns so filed shall be
consolidated by the Bureau for purposes of verification There is no showing in the
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
6/24
problem that it is impracticable for Bill and Hillary to file one return, hence they
should file a single return.
*** 94. Who are the individuals required to file an income tax return ?
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
a. Every Filipino citizen residing in the Philippines;b. Every Filipino citizen residing outside the Philippines on his income from sources
within the Philippines;
c. Every alien residing in the Philippines on income derived from sources within the
Philippines; and
d. Every nonresident alien engaged in trade or business or in the exercise of
profession in the Philippines. (Sec. 51 [A] {1}, NIRC of 1997)
***95. Who are the individuals who are not required to file an income tax return ?
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
a. An individual whose gross income does not exceed his total personal and
additional exemptions for dependents, Provided, That a citizen of the Philippines
and any alien individual engaged in business or practice of profession within the
Philippines shall file an income tax return regardless of the amount of gross income;
b. An individual with respect to pure compensation income for services in whatever
form paid, including, but not limited to fees, salaries, wages, commissions, and
similar items, derived from sources within the Philippines, the income tax on which
has been correctly withheld, Provided, That an individual deriving compensation
concurrently from two or more employers at any time during the taxable year shall
file an income tax return: Provided, further, That an individual whose pure
compensation income derived from sources within the Philippines exceeds Sixty
thousand pesos (P60,000.00), shall also file an income tax return;c. An individual whose sole income has been subject to final withholding tax;
d. An individual who is exempt from income tax pursuant to the provisions of the
NIRC of 1997, and other laws, general or special. (Sec. 51 [A] {2}, NIRC of 1997)
NOTES AND COMMENTS: An individual who is not required to file an income tax
return may nevertheless be required to file an information return. (Sec. 51 [A] {3},
NIRC of 1997)
96. F Corporation brought to court the issue of whether it should be made liable
for the payment of the withholding tax at source since it is merely an agent and not
the tax payer. Rule on the issue with reasons.SUGGESTED ANSWER: F Corporation as the withholding agent is explicitly made
personally liable under the Tax Code for the payment of the tax required to be
withheld.
Reason: The law sets no condition for the personal liability of the withholding agent
to attach. This is in order to compel the withholding agent to withhold the tax under
any and all circumstances. In effect, the responsibility for the collection of the tax as
well as the payment thereof is concentrated upon the person over whom the
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
7/24
Government has jurisdiction.
Thus, the withholding agent is the constituted agent both of the government and
the taxpayer. With respect to the collection and/or withholding of the tax, he is the
Governments agent. In regard to the filing of the necessary income tax return and
the payment to the Government, he is the agent of the taxpayer. The withholding
agent, therefore, is no ordinary government agent especially because under the TaxCode he is personally liable for the tax he is duty bound to withhold; whereas, the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue and his deputies are not made liable under the
law. (Filipinas Synthetic Fiber Corporation v. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. Nos.
118498 & 124377, prom. October 12, 1999)
NOTES AND COMMENTS: Do not confuse the above holding with question no. 97,
infra. The issue in this question is the liability of the withholding agent for the
unpaid taxes WHILE under question no. 97 the issue is whether a withholding agent
is within legal contemplation a taxpayer who could avail of the tax amnesty.
The two (2) types of withholding at source are the 1) final withholding tax; and 2)
creditable withholding tax.
Under the final withholding tax system the amount of income tax withheld by the
withholding agent is constituted as a full and final payment of the income due from
the payee on the said income. [1st sentence, 1st par., Sec. 2.57 (A), Rev. Regs. No.
2-98]
The liability for payment of the tax rests primarily on the payor or the withholding
agent.. Thus, in case of his failure to withhold the tax or in case of under
withholding, the deficiency tax shall be collected from the payor withholding agent.
The payee is not required to file an income tax return for the particular income.
Example: Mara won P200,000.00 from the Pera or Bayong contest. It should be the
sponsor-payor who is required to deduct the appropriate withholding tax from the
P200,000.00 prize before it is given to Mara. Mara, the payee is not required to filean income tax return for the P200,000.00. Failure to withhold subjects the sponsor-
payee to the tax.
Under the creditable withholding tax system, taxes withheld on certain income
payments are intended to equal or at least approximate he tax due from the payee
on the said income. The income recipient is still required to file an income tax return
and/or pay the difference between the tax withheld and the tax due on the income.
[1st and 2nd sentences, Sec. 257(B), Rev. Regs. No. 2-98]
The two kinds of creditable withholding taxes are 1) taxes withheld on income
payments covered by the expanded withholding tax; and 2) taxes withheld on
compensation income.Exemptions from the requirement of withholding or when no withholding taxes
required: Payments to the following:
1. National Government and its instrumentalities including provincial, city, or
municipal governments;
2. Persons enjoying exemption from payment of income taxes pursuant to the
provisions of any law, general or special, such as but not limited to the following:
a. Sales of real property by a corporation which is registered with and certified by
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
8/24
the HLURB or HUDCC as engaged in socialized housing project where the selling
price of the house and lot or only the lot does not exceed P180,000.00 in Metro
Manila and other highly urbanized areas and P150,000.00 in other areas or such
adjusted amount of selling price for socialized housing as may later be determined
and adopted by the HLURB;
b. Corporations registered with the Board of Investments and enjoying exemptionsfrom income under the Omnibus Investment Code of 1997;
c. Corporations exempt from income tax under Sec. 30, of the Tax Code, like the
SSS, GSIS, the PCSO, etc. However, income payments arising from any activity
which is conducted for profit or income derived from real or personal property shall
be subject to a withholding tax. (Sec. 57.5, Rev. Regs. No. 2-98)
97. Andres Soriano, a U.S. citizen and resident, formed A. Soriano Y Cia, which
was subsequently renamed ANSCOR. He owned originally issued common shares
which subsequently earned stock dividends. When he died, part of the shares
passed on to his widow and another part to his estate. Stock dividends were again
declared. Subsequently, ANSCOR reclassified its existing common shares into
common and preferred shares. The widow and the estate exchanged their common
stockholdings for preferred shares, with the estate retaining some common shares.
ANSCOR then redeemed the common shares belonging to the estate after which the
BIR assessed ANSCOR for deficiency withholding tax-at source on the transactions
of exchange and redemption of stocks.
May ANSCOR, as the withholding agent avail of the beneficent provisions of P.D. No.
67, which condones, the collection of all internal revenue taxes including the
increments of penalties on account of non-payment as well as all civil, criminal or
administrative liabilities arising from or incident to (voluntary) disclosures under
the NIRC of previously untaxed income and/or wealth realized here or abroad byany taxpayer, natural or juridical. ?
SUGGESTED ANSWER: No. In the operation of the withholding tax system, the
withholding agent is the payor, a separate entity acting no more than an agent of
the government for the collection of the tax in order to ensure its payments. The
payor of the tax is the taxpayer, he is the person subject to tax imposed by law; and
the payee is the taxing authority.
In other words, the withholding agent is merely a tax collector, not a taxpayer.
Under the withholding system, however, the agent-payor becomes a payee by
fiction of law. His (agent) liability is direct and independent from the taxpayer,
because the income tax is still imposed on and due from the latter. The agent is notliable for the tax as no wealth flowed into him, he earned no income. The Tax Code
only makes the agent personally liable for the tax arising from the breach of its
legal duty to withhold as distinguished from its duty to pay tax since, the
government cause of action against the withholding agent is not for the collection of
income tax, but for the enforcement of the withholding provisions of the Tax Code,
compliance with which is imposed on the withholding agent and not upon the
taxpayer.
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
9/24
A withholding agent, not being a taxpayer is not covered by the protective embrace
of a tax amnesty because the provisions of the implementing rules of P.D. No. 370
which expanded amnesty on previously untaxed income is explicit in excluding tax
liabilities on withholding tax at source. (Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Court
of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 108576, January 20, 1999)
NOTES AND COMMENTS:The above Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Court of Appeals, et al., (ANSCOR),
case may have an impact on the doctrine enunciated in Commissioner of Internal
Revenue v. Procter & Gamble Philippine Manufacturing Corporation, 204 SCRA 377,
383-386.
Procter & Gamble held that a taxpayer is defined under the NIRC as any person
subject to tax. Since, the withholding agent who is required to deduct and
withhold any tax is made personally liable for such tax, subject to and liable for
deficiency assessments, surcharges and penalties should the amount of the tax be
finally determined to be less than that required to he withheld by law, then he is a
taxpayer. He has sufficient legal interest to bring a suit for refund of taxes he
believes were illegally collected from him. (citing Philippine Guaranty Company, Inc.
v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 15 SCRA 1)
The reader should take note that, in case of doubt, tax amnesties are to be strictly
construed against the government. Tax statutes being burdens are not to be
presumed beyond what the tax amnesty expressly and clearly declares. (Republic v.
Intermediate Appellate Court, 196 SCRA 335)
To summarize, if the issue is application for refund, the withholding agent is a
taxpayer (Procter & Gamble), but for tax amnesty purposes, he is not. (Anscor)
TARIFF AND CUSTOMS CODE98. When does importation begin and when does it end ?
SUGGESTED ANSWER: Importation begins when the conveying vessel or aircraft
enters the jurisdiction of the Philippines with intention to unlade therein.
Importation is deemed terminated upon payment of the duties, taxes and other
charges due upon the agencies, or secured to be paid, at the port of entry and the
legal permit for withdrawal shall have been granted.
In case the articles are free of duties, taxes and other charges, until they have
legally left the jurisdiction of the customs. (Sec. 1202, TCCP)
99. What is meant by the flexible tariff clause ?SUGGESTED ANSWER: This is a provision in the Tariff and Customs Code, which
implements the constitutionally delegated power of the President of the Philippines,
in the interest of national economy, general welfare and/or national security upon
recommendation of the NEDA to increase, reduce or remove existing protective
rates of import duty, PROVIDED THAT, the increase should not be higher than 100%
ad valorem; to establish import quota or to ban imports of any commodity, to
impose additional duty on all imports not exceeding 10% ad valorem.
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
10/24
*** 100. The Tariff and Customs Code provides for the imposition of special customs
duties. What are these duties and what is their nature and purpose ?
SUGGESTED ANSWER: Special customs duties are additional import duties imposed
on specific kinds of imported articles under certain conditions.
The special customs duties are the anti-dumping duty, the countervailing duty, thediscriminatory duty and the marking duty.
The special customs duties are imposed for the protection of consumers and
manufacturers, as well as Philippine products.
*** 101. Explain briefly what is meant by anti-dumping duty and when is it
imposed ?
SUGGESTED ANSWERS: A special duty imposed on the importation of a product,
commodity or article of commerce into the Philippines at less than its normal value
when destined for domestic consumption in the export country, which is the
difference between the export price and the normal value of such product,
commodity or article. (Sec. 301 (s) (1), TCC, as amended by R.A. No. 8752, Anti-
Dumping Act of 1999.)
The anti-dumping duty is imposed where the importation of the product, commodity
or article of commerce described above is causing or is threatening to cause
material injury to a domestic industry, or materially retards the establishment of a
domestic industry producing the like product. (Sec. 301 (a), TCC, Ibid.)
NOTES AND COMMENTS:
The definition under the R.A. No. 8752, the Anti-Dumping Act of 1999, is
substantially the definition provided for under R.A. No. 7843, the Anti-Dumping Act
of 1994.
102. Explain the meaning of normal value for purposes of imposing the anti-
dumping duty.
SUGGESTED ANSWER: It is the comparable price at the date of sale of like product,
commodity, or article in the ordinary course of trade when destined for consumption
in the country of export. (Sec. 301 (s) (3 ), TCC, as amended by R.A. No. 8752,
Anti-Dumping Act of 1999.)
103. What is meant by dumped import/product ?
SUGGESTED ANSWER: Any product, commodity or article of commerce introduced
into the Philippines at an export price less than its normal value in the ordinarycourse of trade, for the like product, commodity or article destined for consumption
in the exporting country, which is causing or is threatening to cause material injury
to a domestic industry, or materially retarding the establishment of a domestic
industry producing the like product. (Sec. 301 (s) (5), TCC, as amended by R.A. No.
8752, Anti-Dumping Act of 1999.)
*** 104. Who imposes the anti-dumping duty.
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
11/24
SUGGESTED ANSWER: The Secretary of Trade and Industry in the case of non-
agricultural product, commodity, or article or the Secretary of Agriculture, in the
case of agricultural product, commodity or article, after formal investigation and
affirmative finding of the Tariff Commission.
Even when all the requirements for the imposition have been fulfilled, the decision
on whether or not to impose a definitive anti-dumping duty remains the prerogativeof the Tariff Commission. (Sec. 301 (a), TCC, as amended by R.A. No. 8752, Anti-
Dumping Act of 1999.)
NOTES AND COMMENTS: R.A. No. 8752, Anti-Dumping Act of 1999 abolished the
Special Committee on Anti-Dumping created under R.A. No. 7843, the Anti-
Dumping Act of 1994.
Criteria used by the Tariff Commission whether or not to impose the anti-dumping
duty. It may consider among others, the effect of imposing an anti-dumping duty on
the welfare of the consumers and/or the general public, and other related local
industries. (Sec. 301 (a), TCC, as amended by R.A. No. 8752, Anti-Dumping Act of
1999.)
*** 105. What is the amount of anti-dumping duty that may be imposed ?
SUGGESTED ANSWER: The difference between the export price and the normal
value of such product, commodity or article. (Sec. 301 (s) (1), TCC, as amended by
R.A. No. 8752, Anti-Dumping Act of 1999.)
The anti-dumping duty shall be equal to the margin of dumping on such product,
commodity or article thereafter imported to the Philippines under similar
circumstances, in addition to ordinary duties, taxes and charges imposed by law on
the imported product, commodity or article,
*** 106. What are countervailing duties ?SUGGESTED ANSWER: Additional customs duties imposed on any product,
commodity or article of commerce which is granted directly or indirectly by the
government in the country of origin or exportation, any kind or form of specific
subsidy upon the production, manufacture or exportation of such product
commodity or article, and the importation of such subsidized product, commodity,
or article has caused or threatens to cause material injury to a domestic industry or
has materially retarded the growth or prevents the establishment of a domestic
industry. (Sec. 302, TCCP as amended by Section 1, R.A. No. 8751)
*** 107. What are marking duties ?
SUGGESTED ANSWER: Additional customs duties imposed on foreign articles (or itscontainers if the article itself cannot be marked), not marked in any official
language in the Philippines, in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly and
permanently in such manner as to indicate to an ultimate purchaser in the
Philippines the name of the country of origin.
*** 108. What is a discriminatory duty ?
SUGGESTED ANSWER: New and additional customs duty imposed upon articles
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
12/24
wholly or in part the growth or product of, or imported in a vessel, of any foreign
country which imposes, directly or indirectly, upon the disposition or transportation
in transit through or reexportation from such country of any article wholly or in part
the growth or product of the Philippines, any unreasonable charge, exaction,
regulation or limitation which is not equally enforced upon like articles of every
foreign country, or discriminates against the commerce of the Philippines, directlyor indirectly, by law or administrative regulation or practice, by or in respect to any
customs, tonnage, or port duty, fee, charge, exaction, classification, regulation,
condition, restriction or prohibition, in such manner as to place the commerce of the
Philippines at a disadvantage compared with the commerce of any foreign country.
109. What is the doctrine of primary jurisdiction ?
SUGGESTED ANSWER: The Bureau of Customs has exclusive administrative
jurisdiction to conduct searches, seizures and forfeitures of contraband without
interference from the courts. It could conduct searches and seizures without need of
a judicial warrant except if the search is to be conducted in a dwelling place.
***110. The Collector of Customs issued a Warrant of Seizure and Detention of
25,000 baga of rice, bearing the name of SNOWMAN, Milled in Palawan shipped
on board the M/V Alberto which was then docked at Pier 6 at Cebu City. The
warrant was issued on the basis of a report that the rice had been illegally imported
as it was landed in Palawan by a foreign vessel and then placed in sacks marked
SNOWMAN, Milled in Palawan. It was then shipped to Cebu City on board the M/V
Alberto. Forfeiture proceedings were then started in the Cebu City customs office.
The consignee then filed a civil suit for injunction before the Cebu City RTC, which
issued the injunction because there was alleged lack of probable cause for customs
to effect the seizure. Was the issuance of the injunction proper ?SUGGESTED ANSWER: No. There is no question that RTCs are devoid of any
competence to pass upon the validity or regularity of seizure and forfeiture
proceedings conducted by the Bureau of Customs and to enjoin or otherwise
interfere with these proceedings. The Collector of Customs sitting in seizure and
forfeiture proceedings has exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine all questions
touching on the seizure and forfeiture of dutiable goods. RTCs are precluded from
assuming cognizance over such matters even through petitions of certiorari,
prohibition or mandamus. (The Bureau of Customs, et al., v. Ogario, et al., G.R. No.
138081, prom. March 20, 2000)
NOTES AND COMMENTS:a. The Tariff and Customs Code and the Act Creating the Court of Tax Appeals
specify the proper fora and procedure for the ventilation of ant legal objections or
issues raised concerning seizure and forfeiture proceedings. Thus, actions of the
Collector of Customs are appealable to the Commissioner of Customs, whose
decision, in turn, is subject to the exclusive appellate jurisdiction of the Court of Tax
Appeals and from there to the Court if Appeals.
The rule that RTCs have no review powers over such proceedings is anchored upon
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
13/24
the policy of placing no unnecessary hindrance on the governments drive, not only
to prevent smuggling and other frauds upon Customs, but more importantly, to
render effective and efficient the collection of import and export duties due the
State, which enables the government to carry out the functions it has been
instituted to perform.
b. The customs authorities do not have to prove to the satisfaction of the court thatthe articles on board a vessel were imported from abroad or are intended to be
shipped abroad before they may exercise the power to effect customs searches,
seizures, or arrests provided by law and continue with the administrative hearings.
(The Bureau of Customs, et al., v. Ogario, et al., G.R. No. 138081, prom. March 20,
2000)
111. Acting on information that a shipment from Hongkong on board the S/S Sa
Dragon violated the Tariff and Customs Code, as amended, agents of the EIIB seized
the shipment. It was found that the 40 ft. van was made to appear as a
consolidation shipment consisting of 232 packages with Translink Intl. Freight
Forwarded as shipper and Transglobe Intl. Inc., as consignee; that there were eight
(8) shippers and eight (8) consignees declared as co-loaders and co-owners of the
contents of the van, when in truth the entire shipment belongs only to one entity;
that the items as declared (various industrial items) were found in the van, instead
it was found to be fully stuffed with textile piece goods.
As a result of the above, the appropriate warrant of seizure was issued and the
goods forfeited in favor of the government.
The consignee filed a petition for redemption of the shipment and the hearing
officer recommended the release of the shipment upon the payment of its domestic
value as the shipment consists of goods which are in legal contemplation not
prohibited, nor the release thereof to the claimant contrary to law.The Commissioner of Customs denied the offer of redemption on the grounds (1)
that the shipment was made to appear an innocuous consolidation shipment
destined for shipment outside of the CY-CFS in order to conceal the textile fabrics;
(2) the eight co-loaders/consignes of the shipment are all fictitious; and (3) CMO 87-
92 provides for a denial of an offer of redemption when the seized shipment is
consigned to a fictitious person.
Would you allow the redemption ? Why ?
SUGGESTED ANSWER: Yes. There is absent the following circumstances hence, it
would be proper to allow the redemption of forfeited property upon payment of its
computed domestic market value. (Transglobe International, Inc. v. Court ofAppeals, et al., G.R. No. 126634, January 25, 1999)
a. There is fraud;
b. The importation is absolutely prohibited, or
c. The release of the property would be contrary to law. (Ibid.)
Misdeclarations in manifest and rider cannot be ascribed to a consignee since it was
not the one that prepared them. As said in Farolan, if at all, the wrongful making or
falsity of the documents can only be attributed to the foreign suppliers or shippers. .
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
14/24
(Ibid.)
NOTES AND COMMENTS: Fraud as defined in Sec. 1, par. 1.a., CMO-87-92 must be
actual, not constructive.
Sec. 1.a., CMO-87-92 is of the same tenor as Sec. 2530, pars., (f) and (m), subpars.
3, 4 and 5, which deals with falsities committed by the owner, importer, exporter or
consignee or importation/exportation through any other practice or device.In Aznar v. Court of Tax Appeals, 58 SCRA 519, reiterated in Farolan, Jr. v. Court of
Tax appeals, et al., 217 SCRA 298, the Supreme court clarified that the fraud
contemplated by law must be actual and not constructive. It must be intentional,
consisting of deception, willfully and deliberately done or resorted to in order to
induce another to give up some right.
*** Forfeiture proceedings are in the nature of proceedings in rem.
Forfeiture of seized goods in the Bureau of Customs is a proceeding against the
goods and not against the owner.
It is in the nature of a proceeding in rem, i.e. directed against the res or imported
goods and entails a determination of the legality of their importation. In this
proceeding, it is in legal contemplation the property itself which commits the
violation and is treated as the offender, without reference whatsoever to the
character or conduct of the owner.
The issue is limited to whether the imported goods should be forfeited and disposed
of in accordance with law for violation of the Tariff and Customs Code. .(Transglobe
International, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 126634, January 25, 1999)
The one-year prescriptive period for forfeiture proceedings applies only in the
absence of fraud. (Commissioner of Customs v. Clurt of Tax Appeals, et al., G.R. No.
132929, prom. March 27, 2000)
112. On April 10, 1997, the Collector of Customs conducted a public auction sale ofLot No. 15 consisting of various marble processing machine and grinding machine
which included a Special Circular Saw and a Diamond Sawing Machine. The award
was made to Engr. Franklin Policarpio, the highest bidder. After Engr. Policarpio
signed the Gate Pass evidencing withdrawal of Lot No. 15 from customs custody, he
found that the two saws were missing and upon his investigation found that the
items were installed in the compound of Carrara Marble Philippines, Inc.
Consequently, for alleged violations of Section 2536 (non-payment of duties and
taxes) and Section 2530 [e] (illegal removal of articles from warehouse) of the Tariff
and Customs Code (TCC) the saws were seized by authority of a Warrant of Seizure
and Detention dated May 29, 1991, from the compound of Carrara Marble.Carrara Marble failed to present evidence of payment of duties and taxes and its
defense is an alleged local sale evidenced by notarized Deeds of Sale. In the
meantime, Engr. Policarpio intervened and claimed ownership of the saws. Carrara
Marble then offered to settle the case in accordance with the provisions of the TCC.
However, the offer was refused by the Bureau of Customs, which then declared the
articles forfeited in favor of the Government. Resolve the following issues explaining
briefly the reasons for your answer:
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
15/24
a. Is it valid to forfeit an article found in the possession of a third party after the sale
at public auction ?
b. Has the importation been terminated ?
c. Who has the right to retain possession over the two (2) saws ?
SUGGESTED ANSWERS:
a. Yes, because there is showing that the imported saws were acquired by CarraraMarble while they were in customs custody without showing that the correct duties
and taxes were paid thereon.
The TCC subjects to forefeiture any article which is removed contrary to law from
any public or private warehouse under customs supervision, or released irregularly
from customs custody. Before forfeiture proceedings are instituted, the law requires
the presence of probable cause. Once established the burden of proof is shifted to
the claimant. Customs officers with proper authorization from the Commissioner in
writing, may demand evidence of payment of duties and taxes on foreign articles
openly offered for sale or kept in storage; and if no such evidence can be produced,
such articles may be seized and subjected to forfeiture proceeding; provided
however, that during such proceedings the person or entity from whom such
articles were seized shall be given an opportunity to prove or show the source of
such articles and the payment of duties and taxes thereon. Under the
circumstances, it is clear that before the delivery of the items to Engr. Policarpio,
the Bureau of Customs had custody of said saws. It was only when the whole was
handed over to Engr. Policarpio that it was discovered that the two saws were
missing.
In this case the forfeiture takes effect immediately upon the commission of the
offense. The forfeiture of the subject machineries, retroacted to the date they were
illegally withdrawn from customs custody. The governments right to recover the
machineries proceeds from its right as lawful owner and possessor thereof uponabandonment by the importer. Such right may be asserted no matter in whose
hands the property may have come, and the condemnation when obtained avoids
all intermediate alienations.
The forfeiture of the saws rests on a different statutory basis from Policarpios right
to receive the property as the winning bidder in the auction sale. It was based upon
the governments right to recover property illegally withdrawn from its custody.
b. Importation was already terminated after Engr. Policarpio has signed the Gate
Pass evidencing withdrawal of Lot 15 from customs custody.
Importation is deemed terminated upon payment of duties, taxes and other charges
due or secured to be paid upon the articles at a port of entry, and upon the grant ofa legal permit for withdrawal; or in case said articles are free of duties, taxes and
other charges, until they have legally left the jurisdiction of the customs. The
forfeiture of the subject saws however, is not dependent on whether or not the
importation was terminated; rather it is premised on the illegal withdrawal of goods
from customs custody.
Thus, regardless of the termination of importation, customs authorities may validly
seize goods which, for all intents and purposes, still belong to the government.
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
16/24
c. Compromise could not be allowed anymore since the subject machineries had
already been awarded to Policarpio, being the highest bidder in the public auction.
The government has the rightful possession of the saws but it should turnover the
same to Policarpio. (Carrara Marble Philippines, Inc., v. Commissioner of Customs,
G.R. No. 129680, prom. September 1, 1999)
NOTES AND COMMENTS: Administrative and judicial procedures relative to customssearches, seizures and forfeitures:
a. Determination of probable cause and issuance of warrant. The Collector of
Customs upon probable cause that the articles are imported or exported, or are
attempted to be imported or exported, in violation of the tariff and customs laws
shall issue a warrant of seizure. (Sec. 6, Title III, CAO No. 9-93)
If the search and seizure is to be conducted in a dwelling place, then a search
warrant should be issued by the regular courts not the Bureau of Customs.
There may be instances where no warrants issued by the Bureau of Customs or the
regular courts is required, as in search and seizures of motor vehicles and vessels.
b. Actual seizure of the articles. Master this procedure.
Requirements for release under bond of seized articles: This is a probable area so
master.
Settlement of seizure case by payment of fine or redemption of forfeited property.
This is another probable area.
LOCAL TAXATION
*** 113. What are the fundamental principles of local taxation ?
SUGGESTED ANSWER: The fundamental principles of local taxation are:
a. Uniformity;
b. Taxes, fees, charges and other impositions shall be equitable and based on abilityto pay, for public purposes, not unjust, excessive, oppressive or confiscatory, not
contrary to law, public policy, national economic policy or in restraint of trade;
c. The levy and collection shall not be let to any private person;
d. Inures solely to the local government unit levying the tax;
e. The progressivity principle must be observed.
*** 114. On June 26, 1992, the Sangguniang Panlalawigan of Bulacan passed
Provincial Ordinance No. 3, to take effect on July 1, 1992, which levies a tax of 10%
of the fair market value in the locality per cubic meter of ordinary stones, gravel,
sand, earth and other quarry resources extracted from areas of public land withinits territorial jurisdiction.
It now collects the said tax upon quarry resources extracted from private lands by
Republic Cement. It claims authority to do so under the provisions of the Local
Government Code as well as under the Regalian theory of State ownership over all
natural resources. Is the collection correct ?
SUGGESTED ANSWER: No, because the authority under the Local Government Code
to collect taxes on quarry resources applies only to those extracted from public
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
17/24
lands. (Sec. 134 in relation to Sec. 138, Local Government Code)
Furthermore, the Local Government Code prohibits local government units from
collecting excise taxes on articles enumerated under the NIRC, and taxes, fees or
charges on petroleum products. (Sec. 133 [h], Local Government Code in relation to
the Tax Code) The tax imposed is an excise tax upon the performance, carrying on,
or the exercise of an activity. While the Tax Code levies a tax on all quarryresources, regardless of origin, whether extracted from public or private lands, the
Local Government Code authorizes the local government unit to impose such taxes
on those taken from public lands. Thus, those extracted from private lands are
taxable under the NIRC and not by local government units.
The Regalian doctrine may not be applied because taxes, being burdens, are not to
be presumed beyond what the applicable statute expressly and clearly declares, tax
statutes being construed stricitssimi juris against the government. (The Province of
Bulacan, et al., v. The Court of Appeals, etc., et al., 299 SCRA 442)
*** 115. Philippine Basketball Association contested the deficiency amusement tax
assessed against it by the BIR for conducting the professional basketball games and
for the cession of advertising and streamer spaces to Vintage Enterprises, Inc. a)
Should the amusement taxes be paid to the local government instead of the BIR ?
b) Is the cession of advertising and streamer spaces to Vintage Enterprises, Inc.
subject to the payment of amusement taxes ?
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
a. No. Professional basketball games should pay the amusement taxes collected by
the BIR and not the amusement taxes collected by the local governments. The
amusement tax which provinces and cities are allowed to collect under Sec. 140 of
the Local Government Code, refers to an amusement tax to be collected from
proprietors, lessees, or operators of theaters, cinemas, concert halls, circuses,boxing stadia, and other places of amusement. The authority to tax professional
basketball games is not included therein because it is a national tax provided for
under Sec. 125 of the 1997 Tax Code which provides that, There shall be collected
from the proprietor, lessee or operator of cockpits, cabarets, night or day clubs,
boxing exhibitions, professional basketball games, Jai-Alai and racetracks, a tax
equivalent to: xxxx (d) Fifteen percent (15%) in the case of professional basketball
games envisioned in Presidential Decree No. 971: Provided, however, That the tax
herein shall be in lieu of all other percentage taxes of whatever nature and
description; xxx
b) Yes. The second to the last paragraph of Sec. 125 of the 1997 Tax Code providesthat, the term gross receipts embraces all the receipts of the proprietor, lessee or
operator of the amusement place.. This term is broad enough to embrace the
cession of advertising and streamer spaces as the same embraces all the receipts
of the proprietor, lessee or operator of the amusement place. It is thus, a national
tax not a local tax.
The recognition by the BIR of such income from cession as a local tax is of no
moment because the Government is never estopped by the mistake or error on the
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
18/24
part of its agents, specially on the matter of taxes. (Philippine Basketball
Association v. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 119122, prom. August 8, 2000)
116. The City Treasurer discovered that the Knechts failed to pay their real property
taxes on their property consisting of a parcel of land with an area of 8,102 sq.m.
The property was subsequently sold at public auction for the tax delinquency.However, the Knechts did not receive any notice of their tax delinquency and that
the Rgister of Deeds did not order them to surrender their owners duplicate for
annotation of the tax lien prior to the sale. Neither did they have notice of the
auction sale nor was the certificate of sale annotated on their title nor with the title
in the possession of the Register of Deeds.
Is the tax sale valid ? Reason out your answer.
SUGGESTED ANSWER: No. It has been ruled that the notice and publication, as well
as the legal requirements for a tax delinquency sale, are mandatory, and the failure
to comply therewith can invalidate the sale. The prescribed notices must be sent to
comply with the requirements of due process. (De Knecht, et al,. v. Court of
Appeals; De Knecht, et al., v. Honorable Sayo, 290 SCRA 223,236)
The reason behind the notice requirement is that tax sales are administrative
proceedings which are in personam in nature. (Puzon v. Abbellera, 169 SCRA 789,
795; De Asis v. I.A. C., 169 SCRA 314)
NOTES AND COMMENTS: All of the above cases were decided interpreting the
provisions of C.A. No. 470, the old Assessment Law, and P.D. No. 464, the Real
Property Tax Code, both of which required personal notice to the taxpayer in
addition to the requisite advertisement.
The provisions of Sec. 260 of the Local Government Code on Advertisement and
Sale does not require personal notice to the delinquent taxpayer.
In view of the above, the author believes that personal notice of the auction sale isnot required anymore under the provisions of the Local Government Code of 199
which repealed C.A. No. 470 and P.D. No. 464)
REAL PROPERTY TAXATION
***117. What are the fundamental principles of real property taxation ?
a. Appraisal at current and fair market value;
b. Classification for assessment on the basis of actual use;
c. Assessment on the basis of uniform classification;
d. Appraisal, assessment, levy and collection shall not be let to a private person;e. Appraisal and assessment shall be equitable.
118. Determination of various items:
a. The reasonable market value is determined by the assessor in the form of a
schedule of fair market values. The schedule is then enacted by the local
sanggunian.
b. The assessment level is fixed by ordinances of the appropriate sanggunian.
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
19/24
c. The tax rate is also fixed by ordinances of the appropriate sanggunian.
119. Property exempt from the payment of real property tax:
a. Real property owned by the Republic of the Philippines or any of its political
subdivisions except when the beneficial use thereof has been granted to a taxable
person for a consideration or otherwise;b. Charitable institutions, churches, parsonages or convents appurtenant thereto,
mosques, non-profit or religious cemeteries, and all lands, buildings and
improvements actually, directly and exclusively used for religious, charitable and
educational purposes;
c. Machineries and equipment, actually, directly and exclusively used by local water
districts; and government owned and controlled corporations engaged in the supply
and distribution of water and generation and transmission of electric power;
d. Real property owned by duly registered cooperatives;
e. Machinery and equipment used for pollution control and environmental
protection.
120. The protest contemplated under Section 252 of R.A. No. 7160 is needed where
there is a question of reasonableness of the amount assessed, not where the
question raised is on the very authority and power of the assessor to impose the
assessment and of the treasurer to collect the tax. (Ty v. Trampe, 250 SCRA 500)
121. On April 3, 1987, Raul purchased from Estrella two lots, both located in Cebu
City. Lot no. 1 contained an area of 49 sq.m. while lot no. 2 contained an area of 48
sq.m. more or less. Both lots had improvements, which were described as "a
residential house of strong materials constructed on the lots above-mentioned."
Raul declared the real property constructed on the said lots for purposes of taxassessment as a residential house of strong materials with a floor area of 60 sq.m.
Effective 1987, the declared property was assessed by the City Assessor under Tax
Declaration 1 at a market value of P60,000.00 and an assessed value of P36,900.00.
During a tax-mapping operation conducted in February 1996, the City Assessor
discovered that the real property declared and assessed under Tax Declaration No.
1 was actually a residential building consisting of four (4) storeys with a fifth storey
used as a roof deck. The building has a total floor area of 500.20 sq. m. The area for
each floor was 100.04 square meters.
As a result of the findings, the City Assessor issued Tax Declaration No. 2 effective
in the year 1996, canceling the previous Tax Declaration and assessing the buildingtherein at a net market value of P499,860.00 and an assessed value of
P374,900.00. The 1987-1991 Schedule of Market Value was applied in the
assessment.
Raul protested the new assessment for being "excessive and unconscionable,"
contending that it was increased by more than 1,000% as compared to its previous
market of P60,000.00 or assessed value of P36,900.00 under Tax Declaration No.
02-20454 and "that he bought the building including the lots for only P100,000.00
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
20/24
on April 3, 1987, which amount should be the market value of the building for
purposes of determining its assessed value." He questioned the new assessment
before the Local Board of Assessment Appeals of Cebu City, which dismissed his
appeal on January 11, 1997. Raul elevated his case to the Central Board of
Assessment Appeals.
On September 17, 1998, the CBAA rendered a decision ordering the Cebu CityAssessor to issue a new Tax Declaration in the amount of P281,588.00. Raul then
filed a motion for the reconsideration of the CBAA's decision. Raul and the City
Assessor jointly agreed that the revised valuation of the property is P78,330.00 as
assessed value, classifying the property at P1,110 per sq. m., the building having
been completed and occupied in 1957 or forty-two (42) years ago.
The CBAA then ruled that for purposes of determining the back taxes due on the
excess area of subject building from 1988 to 1996, the Cebu City Assessor should
issue in accordance with Sec. 222 of the Local Government Code:
a. Tax Declaration effective 1988 to June 30, 1996, based on the minimum rate per
sq. m. for the type of building in accordance with the 1985-1986 Schedule of
Values;
b. Tax Declaration to supersede Tax Declaration No. 1 to be effective from July 1,
1994 to the year 1995, based on the minimum rate per sq. m. for the type of
building, in accordance with the 1988-1991 Schedule of Values; and
c. Tax Declaration to supersede Tax Declaration No. 2 to take effect in 1996, based
on the revised valuation of the property as agreed upon by the parties.
Raul disagrees with the above findings, based on the following:
a) The CBAA erred in resolving the issue of back taxes from 1988 to 1995, despite
the fact that such issue was not raised in the appeal to it, under its pretext that it is
applying Sec. 222 of the Local Government Code.
b) The CBAA erred in not strictly applying par. (l), Sec. 199 of the Local GovernmentCode, defining "Fair Market Value" as basis for computing the "assessed value."
c) The CBAA's ruling is discriminatory, unjust, confiscatory and unconstitutional.
To what court should Raul elevate the adverse decision of the CBAA ? Would his
appeal prosper ?
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Raul should appeal the decision of the CBAA to the Court of Appeals, under Rule 43
of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, by filing a petition for review within a period of
fifteen (15) days from receipt of the adverse CBAA decision.
Raul's appeal would not prosper for the following reasons:
a. The facts of the case do not show that Raul has paid under protest the taxassessed against his property. This is a mandatory requirement under Sec. 252 of
the Local Government Code. This is so, because the issue is reasonableness of the
amount assessed and not on the very authority and power of the assessor to
impose the assessment and of the treasurer to collect the tax. (Ty v. Trampe, 250
SCRA 500)
b. Appellate courts as well as appellate administrative agencies, have inherent
authority to review unassigned errors (1) which are closely related to an error
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
21/24
properly raised, or (2) upon which the determination of the error properly assigned
is dependent, or (3) where the court or administrative agency finds that
consideration of them is necessary in arriving at a just decision of the case. There
was no error, because Raul himself is assailing the subject assessment as
"excessive and unconscionable." Thus, CBAA was duty-bound to review the factual
antecedents of the case and to apply hereon the pertinent provisions of law. In theprocess, CBAA has to apply Sec. 222 of the Local Government Code which
authorizes the collection of back taxes.
c. The excess areas resulting from the revision must be understood as never having
been declared before. This is evident from the provisions of Sec. 222 of the Local
Government Code which reads:
"Sec. 222. Assessment of Property Subject to Back Taxes. -Real property declared
for the first time shall be assessed for taxes for the period during which it would
have been liable but in no case for more than ten (10) years prior to the date of
initial assessment: Provided, however, That such taxes shall be computed on the
basis of the applicable schedule of values in force during the corresponding period."
It is neither just that a landowner should be permitted by an involuntary mistake or
through other causes, not to say bad faith, to state an area far less than that
actually contained in his land and pay a tax to the State a tax far below that which
he should really pay.
d. Raul's contention on the use of market value for the computation of the assessed
value is erroneous. Par. (l) Sec. 199 of the Local Government Code merely defines
"Fair Market Value." It does not in any way direct that the "Fair Market Value"
should be used as a basis for purposes of real property taxation. On the other hand,
par. (a), Sec. 198 of the same Code provides unequivocally that, "Real property
shall be appraised at its current and fair market value." The current value of like
properties and their actual or potential uses, among others, are also considered.Unscrupulous sellers of real estate often understate the selling price in the deed of
sale to minimize their tax liability. Moreover, the value of real property does not
remain stagnant, it is unrealistic to expect that the current market value of a
property is the same as its cost of acquisition ten years ago. In this light, a general
revision of real property assessment is required by law within two (2) years after the
effectivity of the Local Government Code and every three (3) years thereafter. (Sec.
219, Local Government Code)
e. When back taxes were imposed on Raul's property, there was no violation of the
rule that laws shall have only prospective applicability. The provisions of Sec. 25 of
P.D. No. 464, The Real Property Tax Code (now Sec. 222 of the Local GovernmentCode) is not penal in character, hence it may not be considered as an ex post facto
law. (Sesbreno v. Central Board of Assessment Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 106588,
March 24, 1997)
122. What are the administrative remedies that are provided for under the
provisions of R.A. No. 7160, the Local Government Code, before resort to courts is
made relative to real property taxes ?
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
22/24
SUGGESTED ANSWER: A taxpayer may question the constitutionality or legality of a
tax ordinance on appeal within thirty (30) days from effectivity thereof, to the
Secretary of Justice. The taxpayer after finding that his assessment is unjust,
confiscatory, or excessive, must bring the case before the Secretary of Justice for
questions of legality or constitutionality of a city ordinance.
An owner of real property who is not satisfied with the assessment of his propertymay, within sixty (60) days from notice of assessment, appeal to the Local Board of
Assessment Appeals.
Should the taxpayer question the excessiveness of the amount of tax, he must first
pay the amount due. Then, he must request the annotation of the phrase paid
under protest and accordingly appeal to the Local Board of Assessment Appeals by
filing a petition under oath together with copies of the tax declarations and
affidavits or documents to support his appeal. (Lopez v. City of Manila, et al., G.R.
No. 127139, February 19, 1999)
NOTES AND COMMENTS:
Remedies of real property owner who questions validity of tax ordinance:
Secretary of Justice can take cognizance of a case involving the constitutionality or
legality of tax ordinances where there are factual issues involved. (Figuerres v.
Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 119172, March 25, 1999)
Questions on validity or legality of a tax ordinance. Taxpayer files appeal to the
Secretary of Justice, within 30 days from effectivity thereof. In case the Secretary
decides the appeal, a period also of 30 days is allowed for an aggrieved party to go
to court. But if the Secretary does not act thereon, after the lapse of 60 days, a
party could already seek relief in court.
These three separate periods are clearly given for compliance as a prerequisite
before seeking redress in a competent court. Such statutory periods are set to
prevent delays as well as enhance he orderly and speedy discharge of judicialfunctions. For this reason the courts construe these provisions of statutes as
mandatory. (Reyes, et al., v. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 118233, prom.
December 10, 1999)
Public hearings are mandatory prior to approval of tax ordinance, but this still
requires the taxpayer to adduce evidence to show that no public hearings ever took
place. (Ibid.)
123. What are the steps to be f
ollowed for the mandatory conduct of General Revision of Real Property
Assessments ?
a. Preparation of Schedule of Fair Market Values;
b . Enactment of Ordinances;
1) levying an annual ad valorem tax on real property and an
additional tax accruing to the Special Education Fund;
2) Fixing the assessment levels to be applied to the market values of real
properties;
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
23/24
3) Providing the necessary appropriations to defray expenses incident to general
revision of real property assessments,; and
4) Adopting the Schedule of Fair Market Values prepared by the assessors. (Lopez v.
City of Manila, et al., G.R. No. 127139, February 19, 1999)
NOTES AND COMMENTS:
Public hearings are required to be conducted prior to the enactment of an ordinanceimposing real property taxes. (Figuerres v. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 119172,
March 25, 1999)
124. What are the steps to be followed in the preparation of fair market values ?
a. The city or municipal assessor shall prepare a schedule of fair market values for
the different classes of real property situated in their respective Local Government
Units for the enactment of an ordinance by the sanggunian concerned; and
b. The schedule of fair market values shall be published in a newspaper of general
circulation in the province, city or municipality concerned or the posting in the
provincial capitol or other places as required by law. (Lopez v. City of Manila, et al.,
G.R. No. 127139, February 19, 1999)
NOTES AND COMMENTS: Proposed fair market values of real property in a local
government unit as well as the ordinance containing the schedule must be
published in full for three (3) consecutive days in a newspaper of local circulation,
where available, within ten (10) days of its approval, and posted in at lease two (2)
prominent places in the provincial capitol, city, municipal or barangay hall for a
minimum of three (3) consecutive weeks. (Figuerres v. Court of Appeals, et al,. G.R.
No. 119172, March 25, 1999)
125. What is the procedure to be followed in computing real property taxes ?
SUGGESTED ANSWER:a. Ascertain the assessment level of the property;
b. Multiply the market value by the applicable assessment level of the property; and
c. Find the tax rate which corresponds to the class (use) of the property and
multiply the assessed value by the applicable tax rate. For easy reference, the
computation of real property tax is cited below:
Market value P x x x
Multiplied by Assessment Level ( x %)
Assessed value P x x x
Multiplied by Rate of Tax ( x %)
Real Property Tax P x x x (Lopez v. City of Manila, et al., G.R. No. 127139, prom.February 19, 1999)
NOTES AND COMMENTS: It is farfetched that the above question would be given. It
was included only for illustrative purposes. However the following concept relative
to the determination of real property taxes in order to ease the predicament of the
low and middle-income groups of taxpayers, may be asked:
With the introduction of assessment levels, tax rates could be maintained, although
tax payments can be made either higher or lower depending on their percentage
-
8/22/2019 TRANSFER TAXES-Sample Questions
24/24
(assessment level) applied to the fair market value of property to derive its
assessed value which is subject to tax. Moreover, classes and values of real
properties can be given proper consideration, like assigning lower assessment
levels to residential properties and higher levels to properties used in business.
(Lopez v. City of Manila, et al., G.R. No. 127139, prom. February 19, 1999)