transcultural communication networks and adult cognitive development
DESCRIPTION
Der Vortrag schlägt für das Forschungsfeld der interkulturellen Kommunikation eine neue Theorieperspektive vor: die der Entwicklungspsychologie. Er geht aus von den Theorien von Jean Piaget und Lawrence Kohlberg über die stufenweise Entwicklung von Kognition und Moral beim Individuum und schlägt den Bogen zu Jürgen Habermas, der Gesellschaften und Kulturen einen ähnlichen evolutionären Lernprozess durchlaufen sieht. Das „Model of Hierarchical Complexity“ des Harvard-Psychologen Michael Commons wird schließlich herangezogen, um individuelle wie gesellschaftliche Lernprozesse anhand der Komplexität von Verhalten mathematisch-quantitativ fassbar zu machen. Abschließend werden die praktisch-politischen Implikationen dieses Denkansatzes diskutiert, etwa für die strategische Kommunikation bei Demokratieförderung und Nation-Building.TRANSCRIPT
page 1 „Networks of transnational and transcultural communication“
DGPuK Dortmund November 22-23, 2012
Bringing social psychology back in: Transcultural communication networks and adult cognitive development
Uwe Krüger
Photo
: w
allp
apers
tock.n
et
page 2
1. Introduction
2. Stages of individual development (Piaget, Kohlberg)
3. Stages of societal development (Habermas, Commons)
4. Implications for transcultural communication networks
Outline
page 3
Motivation: What can social network analysis learn from psychology?
Introduction Individual Societal Implications
Social network analysis primarily addresses the “outer”
characteristics of human interrelations
Hardly considers the inner processes of humans, which is
the subject of psychology
Inner processes of humans may have an important impact
on the outer characteristics of their relations
For describing networks of transcultural communication
approaches of adult cognitive development are important
page 4
1. Introduction
2. Stages of individual development (Piaget, Kohlberg)
3. Stages of societal development (Habermas, Commons)
4. Implications for transcultural communication networks
Outline
page 5
Humans of different ages think in
qualitatively different ways
mental structures, used to perceive and
interpret the world, dramatically change
Successive decrease of egocentrism
Capacity for abstraction and for
complex views and actions increases
Simple actions are combined, integrated
and differentiated
Jean Piaget: Cognitive development proceeds in stages
Introduction Individual Societal Implications
Photo
: en.w
ikip
edia
.org
page 6
1. Sensorimotor stage (age 0-2):
Simple actions: Sucking, Watching, Grasping, Pushing
Combination and coordination
2. Pre-operational stage (age 2-7):
Mental representations of physically absent objects
Unable to take others‘ perspectives
Magical and animist thinking predominates
Jean Piaget identified 4 stages of cognitive development
Societal Implications Introduction Individual
page 7
3. Concrete-operational stage (age 7-11):
Ability to solve practical problems through trial-and-error
Sound, general conclusions based on concrete observations
(inductive logic)
4. Formal-operational stage (age 11 and older):
Deal with abstract concepts and hypothetical problems
Deductive logic
Systematic search for answers to the big questions
Jean Piaget identified 4 stages of cognitive development
Societal Implications Introduction Individual
page 8
Conscious perception is the basis for
moral weightings
Kohlberg distinguished 6 stages, grouped
into 3 levels: pre-conventional,
conventional, post-conventional
Decreasing egocentrism
Increasing acceptance of abstract,
universal principles
Increasing ability to solve moral dilemmas
Lawrence Kohlberg: Cognitive development is connected with moral judgement
Societal Implications
Photo
: http://p
sy.b
uu.e
du.c
n
Introduction Individual
page 9
A Pre-conventional level
1. The Stage of Punishment and Obedience: Avoiding negative
sanctions
2. The Stage of Individual Instrumental Purpose and Exchange :
Seeking for benefit
B Conventional level
3. The Stage of Mutual Interpersonal Expections, Relationships, and
Conformity: Good boy/good girl attitude
4. The Stage of Social System and Conscience Maintenance: Law
and order
Lawrence Kohlberg identified 6 stages of moral development
Societal Implications Introduction Individual
page 10
C Post-conventional level
5. The Stage of Social Contract and Individual Rights: Laws can be
changed by majority
6. The Stage of Universal Ethical Principles: Dignity and justice
Lawrence Kohlberg identified 6 stages of moral development
Societal Implications Introduction Individual
page 11
The stages form an invariant, irreversible, and consecutive
sequence of discrete structures: Skipping stages is impossible,
regression is impossible
The stages form a hierarchy: Structures of higher stage
transcend those of the lower one
The stages are universal: They can be observed in the African
jungle as well as in an American Suburb or in the Swiss
mountains
Piaget‘s and Kohlberg‘s strong hypotheses
Societal Implications Introduction Individual
page 12
1. Introduction
2. Stages of individual development (Piaget, Kohlberg)
3. Stages of societal development (Habermas, Commons)
4. Implications for transcultural communication networks
Outline
page 13
Rational, self-reflexive discourse requires a
moral stage on the post-conventional level
Human development involves a „change of
attitude for the transition from action to
discourse. A child growing up, and caught
up, in the communicative practice of
everyday life is not able at the start to
effect this attitude change.“ (Habermas
1999: 125)
Jürgen Habermas: Communicative action depends on the stage of development
Introduction Individual Societal Implications
Photo
: w
ikip
edia
.org
page 14
Jürgen Habermas: Communicative action depends on the stage of development
Implications
Stages of moral
development (Kohlberg)
Types of social interactions
(Habermas)
Pre-conventional (1 + 2) Authority-driven interaction +
cooperation driven by self-
interest
Conventional (3 + 4) Interaction driven by norms and
social roles
Post-conventional (5 + 6) Discourse
Introduction Individual Societal
(Habermas 1999)
page 15
Jürgen Habermas: Individual and societal development are tightly connected
Implications
The individual‘s development depends on and can be fostered
by education and demands from the social environment
Society can learn from above-average individuals: „(…) social
systems can form new structures by utilizing the learning
capacities of their members in order to cope with systems
problems which threaten the maintenance of the self.”
(Habermas 1975: 294)
Introduction Individual Societal
page 16
Jürgen Habermas: Societies go through an evolutionary learning process
Implications
from paleolithic societies with magical-animistic world view
(parallels to the pre-operational stage) and traditional societies
with a mythical-religious world view to modern societies with
rationalized world view (parallels to formal-operational
thinking and post-conventional moral)
Different societies can be put into a hierarchical order, not by
content, but by form, i.e. by structure of consciousness and
organizational complexity
Introduction Individual Societal
page 17
„Model of Hierarchical Complexity“
(MHC) offers a standard method of
examining the universal patterns of
evolution and development
It refers to tasks and the performance of
people on these tasks (and tasks can
contain any kind of information)
quantitative principles – independent from
mentalistic, cultural, or other contextual
explanations
Michael Commons: Scoring societies with mathematical methods
Individual Implications
Photo
: D
are
Associa
tion
Introduction Societal
page 18
Michael Commons: How complex is a behavior?
Individual Implications
Higher-order actions are defined in terms of lower-order actions
organize and transform those lower-order actions
organize lower-order actions in a non-arbitrary way
Fig
ure
: S
. N
. R
oss, as c
ited in C
om
mons 2
008: 309
Introduction Societal
page 19
Michael Commons postulates 14 orders of hierarchical complexity
Individual Implications
0 – Calculatory
1 – Sensory or motor
2 – Circular sensory-motor
3 – Sensory-motor
4 – Nominal
5 – Sentential
6 – Pre-operational
7 – Primary
8 – Concrete
9 – Abstract
10 – Formal
11 – Systematic
12 – Metasystematic
13 – Paradigmatic
14 – Cross-Paradigmatic
Introduction Societal
page 20
Michael Commons applies the MHC also to societal development
Individual Implications
Concrete stage societies: „focuses on events, people, and places
that are personally known. (…) dominated by subsistence
concerns and demonstrate short time horizons. Social
behaviour is characterized by reciprocal exchanges involving
concrete goods and services, and simple social rules.“
Abstract stage societies: „group associations begin as
memberships in political parties, trade associations and unions,
and religious organizations. In contrast to the concrete stage,
one can feel that one is in a social relationship with others and
be loyal to it, even without proximity to other members. (…) the
beginnings of the concept of roles are learned, such that people
understand that different individuals may fill and later leave the
same role.“
Introduction Societal
page 21
Michael Commons applies the MHC also to societal development
Individual Implications
Formal stage societies: „(…) develop empirical interests in
increasing productivity, training, and wealth distribution, which in
turn lead to formal economics and laws. (…) Truly bureaucratic
governments form, with extensive written laws and regulations
that are implemented in ‚letter of the law‘ fashion.“
Systematic stage societies: „(…) systems of relations are
coordinated among the legal, societal, corporate, economic, and
national spheres. (…) Applications of laws are more ‚in the spirit
of‘ than ‚the letter of‘ the law. (…) At this stage, more highly
abstract concepts appear, such as transparency, accountablity,
social justice, and sustainability.“ (Ross/Commons 2008: 484-487)
Introduction Societal
page 22
Michael Commons: Not all members of a society operate at the same stage
Individual Implications
Individuals operate at multiple stages of development in
various domains
Political cultures and social systems display concurrent
operations of several different stages
Political entities “vary widely in their performance within and
across domains” (Ross/Commons 2008: 481)
Introduction Societal
page 23
1. Introduction
2. Stages of individual development (Piaget, Kohlberg)
3. Stages of societal development (Habermas, Commons)
4. Implications for transcultural communication networks
Outline
page 24
Partners might operate at different developmental stages
Example: Mrs. X from Germany and Mr. Y from Iraq – a
divorced couple fight a custody battle before court
Extracts from the psychological expert advice (2012):
Implication I: Communication problems in binational partnerships
Individual Societal Implications Introduction
page 25
“During the examination, Mrs. X appeared (…) self-critical and
reflected. (…) The psychological needs of the child are
perceived by her adequately. Mrs. X appeared reflected on the
child’s emotional situation. Towards the father of her child, Mrs.
X seems to be realistic-distant on the one hand, and on the
other hand unable to cope with his behavior and structure of
personality. Mrs. X is able to name positive features of the
father’s personality, and able and willing to tolerate his
relationship to their common child.”
Implication I: Communication problems in binational partnerships
Individual Societal Implications Introduction
page 26
„Mr. Y showed (…) very little self-criticism during the
examination. Towards the mother of his child, he appeared
disappointed-aversive and unable to cope with her personal
outlook on life. He is not adequately aware of his own share in
the failure of the partnership. It is difficult for him to name positive
features of the mother’s personality. (…) The child’s need for an
unstressed relationship to his mother is perceived not
adequately.“
Implication I: Communication problems in binational partnerships
Individual Societal Implications Introduction
clear differences in self-reflexivity, tolerance and awareness of
the child‘s needs (that might indicate different cognitive stages)
page 27
Implication II: Communicative failure of the West when promoting democracy
Democracy is an operation of abstract-stage societies or
higher (Commons)
Building of a democratic nation in Afghanistan or Iraq might
overstress a concrete society, because stages cannot be
skipped or rushed
Stages have to be considered for strategic communication of
governments or NGOs
Individual Societal Implications Introduction
page 28 Individual Societal Implications Introduction
(Ross 2008: 533)
page 29
Implication III: Discoursive transcultural communication
Discourse according to Habermas requires the highest stages
of cognitive and moral development
If participants cling to magical or mythical thinking, a
rational, self-reflexive discourse is hardly possible
This may effect communication networks within transnational
media players (media corporations, International Consortium of
Investigative Journalists, Reporters without Borders) as well as
media content and its reception
Individual Societal Implications Introduction
page 30
My argument in terms of social network analysis
Individual Societal Implications Introduction
the developmental
stage is an important
feature of the nodes
(e.g., persons,
organizations, states)
that has impact on the
edges (e.g.,
communicative
relations between
them).
Photo
: s.m
edia
/ p
ixelio
.de
page 31
References
Commons, M. L (2008): Introduction to the Model of Hierarchical Complexity and its relationship
to postformal action. In: World Futures, Vol. 64, pp. 305-320.
Habermas, J. (1975): Towards a Reconstruction of Historical Materialism. In: Theory and Society,
Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 287-300.
Habermas, J. (1984): The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 1: Reason and the
Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1999): Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: The
MIT Press.
Kohlberg, L. (1976): Moral development and behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Piaget, J. (1970): Genetic epistemology. New York: W. W. Norton.
Ross, S. N. (2008): Postformal (Mis)Communications. In: World Futures, Vol. 64, pp. 530-535.
Ross, S. N./Commons, M. L. (2008): Applying hierarchical complexity to political development.
In: World Futures, Vol. 64, pp. 480-497.
page 32
Contact
Dr. Uwe Krüger
Universität Leipzig
Institut für Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft, Abteilung Journalistik
Burgstr. 21 / 04109 Leipzig / Germany
Phone: ++49-341 / 97-35756
Fax: ++49-341 / 97-35799
E-mail: [email protected]
URL: www.uni-leipzig.de/journalistik