trans-plan 7367yongestreetinnisfil trafficimpactstudy · based on a review of the town of innisfil...

77
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND SITE PLAN REVIEW Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store 7367 Yonge Street Innisfil, Ontario Prepared for blueprint2build February 2019 SP-2017-037

Upload: others

Post on 18-Sep-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND SITE PLAN REVIEW

Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store 7367 Yonge Street Innisfil, Ontario

Prepared for blueprint2build February 2019

SP-2017-037

Page 2: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,
Page 3: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

February 6, 2019 Mr. Curtis Hatfield, Arch. Tech. blueprint2build Consulting Engineers 14 Cardico Drive, Unit 1A-W Stouffville, ON, L4A 2G5

Re: Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store, 7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON – Traffic Impact Study and Site Plan Review

Dear Mr. Hatfield,

TRANS-PLAN is pleased to submit this Traffic Impact Study and Site Plan Review in support of the proposed gas station and convenience store development, located at 7367 Yonge Street in the Town of Innisfil, Simcoe County.

Our traffic impact study findings indicate that the proposed development could be accommodated on the existing road network without any road improvements required, aside from the construction of / modifications to the proposed site accesses. Minor signal timing adjustments at the Yonge Street and Innisfil Beach Road intersection are suggested to slightly increase the green time for the eastbound through / right movement under future background traffic conditions.

Our site plan review includes a review of the traffic design elements, including parking, site access configuration and site circulation for a fuel tanker truck. The proposed parking supply of nine spaces is just under the Town of Innisfil Zoning By-law 080-13 requirement of 10 spaces; however, the proposed parking supply is expected to be sufficient due to the subject site having no additional amenities and other comparable gas stations. Our review indicates that the site driveway configurations meet the applicable Town and County design standards, and the driveway configurations allow for a fuel tanker truck to enter and circulate the site.

Sincerely, Anil Seegobin, P.Eng. Partner, Engineer

Trans-Plan Transportation Inc. Transportat ion Consul tants

Page 4: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,
Page 5: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

i

Table of Contents

Transmittal Letter Table of Contents

1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1

2. SITE LOCATION ................................................................................................................................... 1

3. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .............................................................................................................. 2

4. EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................................... 2

4.1 Road Network .............................................................................................................................. 2

4.2 Traffic Counts .............................................................................................................................. 2

4.3 Transit Service ............................................................................................................................ 3

5. FUTURE BACKGROUND CONDITIONS .............................................................................................. 3

5.1 Background Growth Rate ............................................................................................................ 3

5.2 Planned Background Developments ........................................................................................... 3

5.3 Planned Roadway Improvements ................................................................................................ 4

6. SITE TRAFFIC ....................................................................................................................................... 4

6.1 Trip Generation ........................................................................................................................... 4

6.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment ................................................................................................. 5

7. FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ............................................................................................ 5

8. CAPACITY ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................................... 5

9. SITE PLAN REVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 9

9.1 Parking Review ........................................................................................................................... 9

9.2 Site Access Design ..................................................................................................................... 9

9.3 Site Circulation Review................................................................................................................ 9

10. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................. 10

10.1 Traffic Impact Study .................................................................................................................. 10

10.2 Site Plan Review ....................................................................................................................... 11

Appendix A – Turning Movement Counts and Signal Timing Plans

Appendix B – Background Traffic Information

Appendix C – Capacity Analysis Sheets

Appendix D – Level of Service Definitions

Appendix E – Town of Innisfil Zoning By-law, Excerpts

Page 6: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

ii

Appendix F – Town of Innisfil Engineering Design Standards, Excerpts

List of Tables

Table 1 – Intersection Turning Movement Count Details ............................................................................... 2

Table 2 – Transit Service in the Study Area .................................................................................................. 3

Table 3 – Site Trip Generation ....................................................................................................................... 5

Table 4 - Capacity Analysis Results .............................................................................................................. 8

Table 5 – Town of Innisfil Zoning By-Law Parking Requirements and Supply ............................................... 9

List of Figures

Figure 1 – Site Location ............................................................................................................................... 12

Figure 2 – Site Plan ..................................................................................................................................... 13

Figure 3 – Existing Study Area Roadway Characteristics ............................................................................ 14

Figure 4 – Existing Traffic Volumes, Weekday AM and PM Peak Hours ..................................................... 15

Figure 5 – Study Area Transit Service ......................................................................................................... 16

Figure 6 – Future Study Area Roadway Characteristics .............................................................................. 17

Figure 7 – 2024 Background Traffic Volumes, Weekday AM and PM Peak Hours ...................................... 18

Figure 8 – 2029 Background Traffic Volumes, Weekday AM and PM Peak Hours ...................................... 19

Figure 9 – Site Traffic Assignment, Weekday AM and PM Peak Hours ....................................................... 20

Figure 10 – Pass-by Trip Adjustment, Weekday AM and PM Peak Hours .................................................. 21

Figure 11 – 2024 Total Traffic Volumes, Weekday AM and PM Peak Hours ............................................... 22

Figure 12 – 2029 Total Traffic Volumes, Weekday AM and PM Peak Hours ............................................... 23

Figure 13 – Fuel Tank Truck Site Circulation – Yonge Street Ingress ......................................................... 24

Figure 14 – Fuel Tank Truck Site Circulation – Innisfil Beach Road Ingress ............................................... 25

Page 7: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

1

Traffic Impact Study and Site Plan Review Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

1. INTRODUCTION

Trans-Plan has been retained by blueprint2build Consulting Engineers to complete a Traffic Impact Study and Site Plan Review for a proposed gas station and convenience store development located at 7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, Ontario. This assessment includes the following studies and tasks:

Traffic Impact Study

a review and assessment of the existing road network

an assessment of boundary road operations under future background conditions, including a review of traffic growth, area developments and proposed transportation improvements in the study area

an assessment of the impact of site-generated traffic on the study area intersections under future traffic conditions for both a five- and a ten-year study horizon

an analysis of the proposed site access operations and circulation scheme

recommendations to mitigate any identified traffic impacts on the boundary roadways, resulting from the proposed development

Site Plan Review

a review of the site parking requirements for the proposed gas station based on the Town of Innisfil Zoning By-law 080-13

a review of site access design standards based on the Town of Innisfil Engineering Design Standards and Specifications Manual

a review of vehicle circulation for fuel tanker truck operations, based on the final site plan

Prior to commencing this study, Transportation and Engineering staff at the Town of Innisfil and Simcoe County were contacted and provided a study Terms of Reference to discuss the scope and methodology. Comments received from the Town and County have been incorporated into the study. This report adheres to the County’s Guidelines for Transportation Impact Studies, 2008.

2. SITE LOCATION

The site, shown in Figure 1, is municipally known as 7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil. The subject site is located on the southeast quadrant of Yonge Street and Innisfil Beach Road. The site is currently vacant. There are two existing full-moves site accesses: one at Yonge Street and one at Innsifil Beach Road.

The Pioneer Energy Gas Station is located opposite the subject site, at the southwest corner of the intersection. Adjacent east of the site are various Town of Innisfil municipal buildings, such as the Innisfil Public Works & Roads Department, South Simcoe Police Innisfil and the Town Hall. Within the same quadrant, southeast of the site, is the Innisfil Recreational Complex and Innisfil YMCA. Aside from these developments, the majority of land uses in the study area are mainly open areas and agricultural uses, with sporadically located industrial buildings and residential dwellings on individual lots. Highway 400 can be accessed along Innisfil Beach Road, approximately 5.5 km west of the site.

Page 8: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2

Traffic Impact Study and Site Plan Review Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

3. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

The site plan, prepared by blueprint2build, is shown in Figure 2. The proposed development consists of a gas bar and canopy with four pumps (eight vehicle fueling positions), and a one-storey building with 232 sq.m. of GFA for convenience store use.

The total on-site parking supply is nine spaces, including one accessible space. Two full-moves site accesses are provided, with one on Yonge Street and one on Innisfil Beach Road.

4. EXISTING CONDITIONS

4.1 Road Network

The major roadways located in the study area are described as follows:

Yonge Street (Simcoe County Road 4) is classified as a primary arterial road under the jurisdiction of Simcoe County. It generally runs in a north-south direction and has three lanes: one lane in each direction, plus a centre left-turn lane. The roadway has a posted speed limit of 60 km/h in the vicinity of the site.

Innisfil Beach Road (Simcoe County Road 21) is classified as a primary arterial road under the jurisdiction of Simcoe County. It generally runs in an east-west direction and has three lanes: one in each direction plus a centre left-turn lane. The roadway has a posted speed limit of 60 km/h in the vicinity of the site.

Yonge Street and Innisfil Beach Road form a signalized intersection with dedicated left turn lanes for all approaches, dedicated right turn lanes for the southbound and westbound approaches and a northbound right turn slip lane. The study area roadway characteristics are shown in Figure 3.

4.2 Traffic Counts

To determine existing operating conditions in the study area, Trans-Plan obtained traffic data from Simcoe County, such as intersection turning movement counts (TMCs) and signal timing plans for the study area intersection of Yonge Street and Innisfil Beach Road. Additionally, Trans-Plan conducted a site visit and traffic observations as well as driveway volume counts at the neighbouring Pioneer Energy Gas Station.

Table 1 provides a summary of the count date, count hours and peak hours obtained for each intersection counted. Detailed TMC data and current signal timing plans provided are included in Appendix A.

Table 1 – Intersection Turning Movement Count Details

Intersection Source Count Date Count Hours Peak Hours

Yonge Street and Innisfil Beach Road

Simcoe County

Tuesday June 27, 2017

6:00am - 9:00am 3:00pm - 6:00pm

6:45am - 7:45am 3:30pm - 4:30pm

Yonge Street and Pioneer Energy Gas

Station Access

Trans-Plan

Tuesday November 14, 2017

7:00am - 8:30am 3:00pm - 4:30pm

7:30am – 8:30am 3:30pm - 4:30pm

For our traffic analysis, the two entrances for the adjacent Pioneer Energy Gas Station development have been consolidated into one entry point, opposite the proposed site access for the subject site. The two

Page 9: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

3

Traffic Impact Study and Site Plan Review Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

count locations were compared for through volumes on Yonge Street, south of Innisfil Beach Road (and were found to be consistent). The counts were balanced (slight volume increases applied) where appropriate. The existing traffic volumes for the weekday AM and PM peak hours are shown in Figure 4.

4.3 Transit Service

The site is served by GO Transit and operates Route 68 Barrie, a north-south bus route that provides stops between Newmarket and Barrie. Key destinations for this route are Newmarket Bus Terminal, East Gwillimbury, Bradford, and Barrie Transit Terminal. These major stops connect to other bus routes and the Barrie GO Train that provides service to Union Station. The nearest bus stop is located at Yonge Street and Innisfil Beach Road, adjacent the existing site access at Yonge Street. Service details for the transit route are provided in Table 2. A route map is provided in Figure 5.

Table 2 – Transit Service in the Study Area

Route No. Nearest Bus Stop at Site

Approximate Service Times Approximate Peak Service Frequency (min)

Weekdays Weekends AM PM SAT

Barrie 68 Yonge Street and Innisfil Beach Road

04:33 – 00:28 07:04 – 00:57 60 60 60

Source: GO Transit website

5. FUTURE BACKGROUND CONDITIONS

Future background traffic volumes were determined based on a review of planned developments, road improvements and future traffic volume growth in the study area.

5.1 Background Growth Rate

Traffic growth in the study area was reviewed through analysis of Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes provided by Simcoe County; however, the results of the review, provided in Appendix B were not conclusive for determining traffic growth on the study roadways. A typical and conservative growth rate of 2.0 percent per year for both a five- and a ten-year planning horizon was therefore, applied to both Yonge Street and Innisfil Beach Road (including turning movements) to account for background traffic growth in the study area.

5.2 Planned Background Developments

Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area, planned within our study horizon. A proposed mixed-use development is located at 7958 Yonge Street, at the northwest corner of the Yonge Street and Victoria Street intersection, approximately 2.5km north of the subject site. Although the site is located a fair distance away, the background traffic from the site is included within our analysis given the scale of the development and given that Yonge Street is a main travel route in the study area. The background development is to consist of 106 residential units, 25,832 sq.ft. of GFA of commercial uses and a gas station with 12 fueling positions.

Site traffic volume and assignment was obtained from the Traffic Impact Study report that was prepared in support of the development, dated May 8, 2017, prepared by JD Northcote Engineering Inc. Detailed traffic data is provided in Appendix B.

Page 10: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

4

Traffic Impact Study and Site Plan Review Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

The site traffic volumes for the above noted development has been incorporated into our analysis of future background traffic conditions.

5.3 Planned Roadway Improvements

As per discussions with Simcoe County staff and a review of the Simcoe County Transportation Master Plan, there are intersection and roadway improvements planned in the study area within our study horizon:

According to the Simcoe County Transportation Master Plan, Innisfil Beach Road, from County Road 27 to County Road 39, is planned to be widened from three lanes to five lanes (including the centre left turn lane). The road widening is expected to begin in year 2019 within the County’s short-term horizon, as noted by County staff. The Environmental Assessment (EA) study for County Road 21 includes a conceptual plan view and cross-section drawings of the County Road 21 widening. In the medium-term horizon, for implementation by year 2031, Yonge Street, from County Road 89 to Barrie City Limit, is planned to be widened from two lanes to four lanes (including a centre left turn lane at certain intersections such as Innisfil Beach Road).

As discussed with County staff, and a review of the EA study for County Road 21, the Yonge Street and Innisfil Beach Road intersection improvements are part of a separate project from the road widenings, for which construction is envisioned to start by 2019. Construction drawings for the roadway configurations have been provided by the County and are shown in Appendix B. The intersection is to include two through lanes and exclusive left-turn lanes at each intersection approach. Exclusive right-turn lanes are to be provided at all approaches except for Innisfil Beach Road at the west approach (eastbound direction).

The future roadway characteristics are shown in Figure 6 and the future background traffic volumes for the horizon years 2024 and 2029, for the weekday AM and PM peak hours, are shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8, respectively.

6. SITE TRAFFIC

6.1 Trip Generation

The site trip generation using ITE rates, Land Use Code (LUC) 945 – Gas Station with Convenience Market, is shown in Table 3.

Pass-by trips arise from existing traffic volumes on the road network that enter the proposed development as an intermediate stop on the way to another destination along the same travel route. Pass-by trip rates were based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manuals, 9th edition, for the appropriate land uses.

Page 11: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

5

Traffic Impact Study and Site Plan Review Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

Table 3 – Site Trip Generation

Land Size AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Use In Out Total In Out Total

Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market

8 Distribution 50% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% fuel

positions Rate 5.08 5.08 10.16 6.76 6.76 13.51

Trips 41 40 81 54 54 108 Pass-By (50% AM, 50% PM) 20 20 40 27 27 54

New Trips 21 20 41 27 27 54

The subject site is expected to generate approximately 41 and 54 new two-way trips during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively. The subject site is expected to generate approximately 40 and 54 pass-by trips during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively.

6.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment

Site trips for the proposed gas station were distributed to / from the subject site and the boundary roadways based on existing travel patterns obtained from the study area intersection counts.

The existing traffic volume percent split along Innisfil Beach Road is approximately 40 percent eastbound / 60 percent westbound in the weekday AM peak hour and the opposite during the weekday PM peak hour. The existing traffic volume percent split along Yonge Street is approximately 40 percent northbound / 60 percent southbound in the weekday AM peak hour and the opposite during the weekday PM peak hour. Utilizing these percentages as a basis, the site traffic was distributed between the Yonge Street and Innisfil Beach Road accesses to account for more difficult left turning movements due to the future median proposed at the intersection from the roadway improvements.

The estimated site traffic assignment for the weekday AM and PM peak hours is shown in Figure 9. The pass-by trip adjustments are shown in Figure 10.

7. FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS

Site traffic volumes were added to the future background traffic volumes to obtain future total traffic volumes for the peak hours. The future total traffic volumes for the horizon years 2024 and 2029, for the weekday AM and PM peak hours, are shown in Figure 11 and Figure 12, respectively.

8. CAPACITY ANALYSIS

A capacity analysis was performed for the study area intersections and site driveway using Synchro analysis software. The capacity queue analysis results of the weekday AM and PM peak hours are shown in Table 4. Capacity Analysis Sheets and Level of Service Definitions are provided in Appendix C and Appendix D, respectively.

An overall level of service (LOS) of D or better and a volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio of less than 1.0 are generally considered acceptable at signalized intersections. An LOS of D for individual movements at stop controlled intersections (or driveways) is generally considered acceptable. The results of the capacity analysis and queuing analysis are summarized in this section for each intersection:

Page 12: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

6

Traffic Impact Study and Site Plan Review Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

Innisfil Beach Road & Yonge Street

Under existing conditions, during the weekday AM peak hour, the intersection operates at an overall acceptable LOS of D and a v/c ratio of 0.59, with an average delay of 40 seconds. The eastbound through / right movement operates near capacity, with a v/c of 0.99 and a delay of 90 seconds. All other movements operate at an acceptable LOS of D or better. During the weekday PM peak hour, the intersection operates similarly, with an overall acceptable LOS of D and a v/c ratio of 0.65, with an average delay of 36 seconds. The eastbound through / right movement operates near capacity, with a v/c of 0.98 and a delay of 84 seconds. All other movements operate at an acceptable LOS of D or better. It was noted from our field observations that the eastbound through / right movement operates better than what our Synchro model analysis results indicate.

The intersection improvements and road widenings endeavoured by the County (as previously discussed in Section 5.3), were included in our assessment of the intersection under future conditions. In addition to these changes, the signal timing for the intersection was optimized to provide 5 more seconds of additional green time for the eastbound through / right movement during the weekday PM peak hour. With the improvements implemented, the intersection is expected to see significant improvements for the overall intersection operations and for the eastbound through / right movement.

Under future 2024 conditions, during the weekday AM peak hour, the intersection is expected to operate at an overall acceptable LOS of C and a v/c ratio of 0.46, with an average delay of 28 seconds. The eastbound through / right movement is expected to operate with an LOS of E and a v/c ratio of 0.81, under both background and future conditions. The intersection is expected to operate similarly during the weekday PM peak hour, with an overall LOS of C and a v/c ratio of 0.43. All individual movements are expected to operate at an acceptable LOS of D or better.

Under future 2029 conditions, during the weekday AM peak hour, the intersection is expected to operate at an overall acceptable LOS of C and a v/c ratio of 0.51, with an average delay of 30 seconds. The eastbound through / right movement is expected to operate with an LOS of E and a v/c ratio of 0.86, under both background and future conditions. The intersection is expected to operate similarly during the weekday PM peak hour, with an overall LOS of C and a v/c ratio of 0.50. The eastbound through / right movement is expected to operate with an LOS of E under future total conditions, but an LOS of D under future background conditions. However, under both scenarios, the movement is expected to operate well due to the similar v/c ratio and vehicle delay. All other individual movements are expected to operate at an acceptable LOS of D or better.

Given the similar traffic operating conditions between the analysis of future background and total conditions, the subject site is not expected to have a significant impact on operations of the overall road network.

Yonge Street & Pioneer Energy Gas Station Access / Proposed Site Access 1

Under existing conditions, during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, traffic exiting at the existing adjacent gas station development (Pioneer Energy) experiences minimal delays up to 18 seconds. The eastbound left / right movement operates at an acceptable LOS of C. The northbound left movement, for traffic entering at Pioneer Energy, operates at a good LOS of A, with minimal delays.

Page 13: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

7

Traffic Impact Study and Site Plan Review Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

Under future traffic conditions, with the proposed site access on Yonge Street for the subject site, traffic at either service station driveway is expected to operate at an acceptable LOS of C or better, with minimal delays up to 20 seconds. These delays are typical from vehicles exiting from driveway accesses onto an arterial road.

Innisfil Beach Road & Proposed Site Access 2

The future site access along Innisfil Beach Road is expected to operate at a good LOS of B or better, during both weekday AM and PM peak hours. Northbound left / right traffic exiting the site is expected to see minimal delays up to 13 seconds. The westbound left movement (inbound traffic) is expected to operate at a good LOS of A, with minimal delays of 9 seconds.

The subject site is expected to operate well within the study area road network, with minimal impact to the overall roadway operations. As per the intersection designs that we reviewed, left-turning traffic at the proposed gas station site accesses would not be restricted by the raised concrete median islands at the Innisfil Beach Road and Yonge Street intersection approaches; however, only minimal volumes of traffic are shown to enter the site by making southbound left turn movements.

Page 14: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

Tabl

e 4

- Cap

acity

Ana

lysi

s R

esul

ts

Inte

rsec

tion

Mov

emen

t

V/C

Del

ayLO

SV/

CD

elay

LOS

V/C

Del

ayLO

SV/

CD

elay

LOS

V/C

Del

ayLO

SV/

CD

elay

LOS

V/C

Del

ayLO

SV/

CD

elay

LOS

V/C

Del

ayLO

SV/

CD

elay

LOS

Inni

sfil

Bea

ch R

oad

& Y

onge

Str

eet

0.59

40D

0.65

36D

0.45

29C

0.43

28C

0.46

29C

0.43

28C

0.51

30C

0.49

30C

0.51

30C

0.50

30C

East

boun

d Le

ft0.

3946

D0.

3844

D0.

3346

D0.

4342

D0.

3346

D0.

4242

D0.

3847

D0.

4643

D0.

3847

D0.

4643

DEa

stbo

und

Thro

ugh

/ Rig

ht0.

9990

F0.

9884

F0.

8157

E0.

8151

D0.

8157

E0.

8151

D0.

8661

E0.

8555

D0.

8662

E0.

8655

EW

estb

ound

Lef

t0.

4636

D0.

4035

C0.

4134

C0.

4332

C0.

4234

C0.

4332

C0.

4734

C0.

4431

C0.

4734

C0.

4531

CW

estb

ound

Thr

ough

0.86

54D

0.62

39D

0.50

35D

0.33

31C

0.51

35D

0.33

31C

0.54

36D

0.33

30C

0.54

36D

0.33

30C

Wes

tbou

nd R

ight

0.04

31C

0.05

31C

0.04

30C

0.06

28C

0.04

30C

0.06

28C

0.05

30C

0.06

27C

0.05

30C

0.06

27C

Nor

thbo

und

Left

0.24

18B

0.23

18B

0.31

20C

0.31

22C

0.31

20C

0.32

23C

0.36

22C

0.37

26C

0.37

22C

0.39

26C

Nor

thbo

und

Thro

ugh

0.32

19B

0.52

23C

0.19

17B

0.32

21C

0.19

17B

0.33

21C

0.21

18B

0.38

24C

0.21

18B

0.38

24C

Nor

thbo

und

Rig

ht0.

0516

B0.

1217

B0.

0316

B0.

0818

B0.

0316

B0.

0818

B0.

0416

B0.

0820

C0.

0417

B0.

0821

CSo

uthb

ound

Lef

t0.

1411

B0.

3012

B0.

1610

B0.

3212

B0.

1710

B0.

3312

B0.

1811

B0.

3914

B0.

1911

B0.

4014

BSo

uthb

ound

Thr

ough

0.40

14B

0.27

11B

0.22

11B

0.16

11B

0.23

11B

0.16

11B

0.25

12B

0.19

13B

0.25

12B

0.19

13B

Sout

hbou

nd R

ight

0.05

10B

0.06

9A

0.06

10A

0.07

10B

0.06

10A

0.07

10B

0.06

10B

0.07

12B

0.06

10B

0.07

12B

Yong

e St

reet

& P

ione

er E

nerg

y G

as

Stat

ion

/ Pro

pose

d Si

te A

cces

s 1

East

boun

d Le

ft / T

hrou

gh /

Rig

ht17

C18

C14

B14

B15

B15

C15

B14

B16

C17

CW

estb

ound

Lef

t / T

hrou

gh /

Rig

ht14

B17

C14

B19

CN

orth

boun

d Le

ft9

A8

A9

A8

A9

A8

A9

A8

A9

A8

AN

orth

boun

d Th

roug

h0

A0

A0

A0

A0

A0

A0

A0

A0

A0

AN

orth

boun

d R

ight

0A

0A

0A

0A

Sout

hbou

nd L

eft /

Thr

ough

0A

0A

0A

0A

Sout

hbou

nd T

hrou

gh /

Rig

ht0

A0

A0

A0

A0

A0

A0

A0

A0

A0

AIn

nisf

il B

each

Roa

d &

Pro

pose

d Si

te

Acc

ess

2Ea

stbo

und

Thro

ugh

0A

0A

0A

0A

East

boun

d Th

roug

h / R

ight

0A

0A

0A

0A

Wes

tbou

nd L

eft

8A

9A

8A

9A

Wes

tbou

nd T

hrou

gh0

A0

A0

A0

AN

orth

boun

d Le

ft / R

ight

12B

12B

12B

13B

PM P

eak

Hou

rAM

Pea

k H

our

PM P

eak

Hou

rAM

Pea

k H

our

PM P

eak

Hou

r

Exis

ting

Traf

fic C

ondi

tions

2024

Bac

kgro

und

Traf

fic C

ondi

tions

2024

Tot

al T

raffi

c C

ondi

tions

2029

Bac

kgro

und

Traf

fic C

ondi

tions

2029

Tot

al T

raffi

c C

ondi

tions

AM P

eak

Hou

rPM

Pea

k H

our

AM P

eak

Hou

rPM

Pea

k H

our

AM P

eak

Hou

r

Page 15: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

9

Traffic Impact Study and Site Plan Review Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

9. SITE PLAN REVIEW

9.1 Parking Review

Our parking study includes a review of the Town’s Zoning By-law requirements for parking. The proposed parking supply for the site is nine spaces, including one accessible space, provided at a total parking rate of 1 space per 26 sq.m. of building GFA.

Parking requirements, based on the Town of Innisfil Zoning By-law 080-13, were reviewed for the site. The parking requirements and supply is shown in Table 5. Source information is provided in Appendix E.

Table 5 – Town of Innisfil Zoning By-Law Parking Requirements and Supply

Land Use (as defined in By-law)

sq.m. of GFA

Parking Requirement Parking Supply Deficiency (spaces) Rate Spaces Rate Spaces

Motor Vehicle Service Station (definition includes

convenience store use) 232 1 / 23 sq.m. of

GFA 10 1 / 26 sq.m. of GFA 9 -1

Source: Town of Innisfil Zoning By-law No. 080-13, Section 3.35

Based on the Town’s Zoning By-law, the parking requirement for the development is 10 spaces, whereas the proposed parking supply is nine spaces, resulting in a deficiency of one space. However, given that the development does not have any additional amenities, such as a drive-thru restaurant or car wash, the proposed parking supply is expected to be sufficient. As a comparable, the Husky gas station (and convenience store) located at 118 Little Avenue, City of Barrie, has a parking supply of approximately 8 spaces.

9.2 Site Access Design

The site accesses have been designed with regard for the standards noted in the Town of Innisfil’s Engineering Design Standards and Specifications Manual, provided in Appendix F.

Non-residential entrances are not to be located within 15m of any intersection; both proposed site accesses are set back at least 30m from the Yonge Street and Innisfil Beach Road intersection.

For non-residential driveway widths, the minimum entrance width is 7.0m and the minimum driveway curb radius is 6.0m.

The proposed site access widths have been based off of the Ministry of Transportation Ontario, Commercial Site Access Standard Design 18 (CSAS-18), for service stations on a rural highway. Both the Yonge Street and Innisfil Beach Road accesses have a proposed driveway width of 9m and a curb radii of 15m. Our site circulation review (to be discussed in the following section) demonstrates that the proposed entrance designs can properly accommodate fuel tanker trucks.

9.3 Site Circulation Review

A site circulation review was completed using AutoTurn vehicle turning template software to demonstrate that a typical fuel tanker truck could enter the site from either access, utilize the underground tank and exit the site in a safe and efficient manner. The vehicle used for the review was based on Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) dimensions for a B-Train Double vehicle, used to depict a double-trailer fuel tanker truck.

Page 16: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

10

Traffic Impact Study and Site Plan Review Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

Prior to the refueling of the underground tanks, the fuel tanker company would contact the owner to confirm the appropriate routes to utilize to ensure the proper circulation of their vehicles. The following two figures demonstrate two preferred schemes for the circulation of fuel tanker trucks within the site:

Figure 13 - A fuel tanker truck enters the site with a northbound right turn manoeuvre at Yonge Street and exits the site at Innisfil Beach Road.

Figure 14 – A fuel tanker truck enters the site with a westbound left turn manoeuvre at Innisfil Beach Road and exits the site at Yonge Street.

10. CONCLUSIONS

This Traffic Impact Study and Site Plan Review for the proposed gas station, located at 7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, is summarized as follows:

10.1 Traffic Impact Study

As per the site plan prepared by blueprint2build Consulting Engineers, the proposed development consists of a gas station with eight vehicle fueling positions and a convenience store. Nine parking spaces are proposed on-site. Access to the site would be provided by two full-moves accesses: one at Innisfil Beach Road and one at Yonge Street.

A review of existing operating conditions indicates that all intersection movements at the adjacent intersection are operating well, except for the eastbound through / right movement, which is near capacity; however, our field observations suggest that the movement is operating better than our modelled analysis results suggest.

A 2024 (five-year horizon) and a 2029 (ten-year horizon) traffic analysis has been included in our traffic assessment. Planned improvements in the study area that are part of the County’s Capital Works program that have been incorporated in our analysis of future conditions, include:

- Widening of Yonge Street from 3 to 5 lanes (inclusive of a centre lane)

- Widening of Innisfil Beach Road from 3 to 5 lanes (inclusive of a centre lane)

- Intersection improvement at Yonge Street and Innisfil Beach Road that include two through lanes per direction, exclusive left turn lanes at all approaches and exclusive right turn lanes at all approaches, except for the eastbound right turn movement

Signal timing optimizations to increase green time for the eastbound through / right movement, by 5 seconds during the weekday PM peak hours, were included in our analysis for the Yonge Street and Innisfil Beach Road intersection under future conditions.

The proposed site accesses are expected to operate at an acceptable LOS of C or better, with minimal delays during the peak hours under future conditions. Although all turning movements could occur at the site accesses, only a minimal number of site trips would likely enter by making southbound left turns, due to the adjacent gas station, causing minimal delay at the intersection. The proposed design of the raised concrete medians at the intersection approaches would not physically restrict left turns.

Based on the results of our traffic analysis, traffic generated by the proposed development could be accommodated on the surrounding road network.

Page 17: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

11

Traffic Impact Study and Site Plan Review Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

10.2 Site Plan Review

Based on the Town of Innisfil Zoning By-law 080-13 for parking requirements, 10 parking spaces are required for the proposed development, which is just above the proposed parking supply of nine spaces. Although the proposed parking supply is deficient by one space, the proposed nine parking spaces are expected to be sufficient to support the subject site as the site has no additional amenities, such as a drive-thru restaurant or car wash. As a comparable, the Husky gas station (and convenience store) located at 118 Little Avenue, City of Barrie, has a parking supply of approximately 8 spaces.

The Town of Innisfil Engineering Design Standards and Specifications Manual was reviewed for “non-residential” entrance designs. Access spacing and entrance widths meet the minimum requirements for both access designs. Both the proposed Yonge Street and Innisfil Beach Road accesses have been designed based off the MTO CSAS-18 design for service stations on a rural highway. Each access has a proposed driveway width of 9m and a curb radii of 15m.

A site circulation review was completed to demonstrate a fuel tanker truck entering and exiting the site to access the underground fuel storage tanks. As shown in Figure 13 and Figure 14, a fuel tanker truck can circulate the site in a safe and efficient manner. Prior to the refueling of the underground tanks, the fuel tanker company would contact the owner to confirm the appropriate routes to properly circulate the site such that the actual vehicle circulation would match the schemes provided in our review.

Respectfully submitted,

Anil Seegobin, P.Eng. Partner, Engineer

Trans-Plan Transportat ion Inc. Transportat ion Consul tants

Page 18: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

12

Traffic Impact Study and Site Plan Review Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

Figure 1 – Site Location

Source: Google Maps

SITE

Page 19: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,
Page 20: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY & SITE CIRCULATION REVIEW

Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

Figure 3: Existing Study Area Roadway Characteristics

1 3

2

LEGEND

Traffic Signal

Posted Speed Limit

Lane ConfigurationYong

e St

reet

Site

Prop

osed

Site

Ac

cess

2

Innisfil Beach Road

Pioneer Gas Station Site Access

Proposed Site Access 1

Schematic; Not To Scale

60

60

60

Page 21: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY & SITE CIRCULATION REVIEW

Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

Figure 4: Existing Traffic Volumes, Weekday AM and PM Peak Hours88 29

4

136

57 78

68 421

81 435 294 569 443

77 71

64 30 1 3

411 303 98 260

43 653 427

52 65

105

456

106

8 409

9 554

22 20 2

23 381

27 26 22 645

LEGEND

Traffic Signal

xx xx AM / PM Peak Hour

Yong

e St

reet

Site

Prop

osed

Site

Ac

cess

2

Innisfil Beach Road

Pioneer Gas Station Site Access

Proposed Site Access 1

Schematic; Not To Scale

Page 22: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

16

Traffic Impact Study and Site Plan Review Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

Figure 5 – Study Area Transit Service

Source: GO Transit Barrie Route Map

Barrie Transit Lines

Page 23: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY & SITE CIRCULATION REVIEW

Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

Figure 6: Future Study Area Roadway Characteristics

1 3

2

LEGEND

Traffic Signal

Posted Speed Limit

Lane ConfigurationYong

e St

reet

Site

Prop

osed

Site

Ac

cess

2

Innisfil Beach Road

Pioneer Gas Station Site Access

Proposed Site Access 1

Schematic; Not To Scale

60

60

60

Page 24: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY & SITE CIRCULATION REVIEW

Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

Figure 7: 2024 Background Traffic Volumes, Weekday AM and PM Peak Hours97 32

5

150

63 86

75 465

89 480 325 628 489

85 78

71 33 1 3

454 335 108

287

47 721 471

57 72

116

503

117

8 452

9 612

22 20 2

23 421

27 26 22 712

LEGEND

Traffic Signal

xx xx AM / PM Peak Hour

Yong

e St

reet

Site

Prop

osed

Site

Ac

cess

2

Innisfil Beach Road

Pioneer Gas Station Site Access

Proposed Site Access 1

Schematic; Not To Scale

Page 25: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY & SITE CIRCULATION REVIEW

Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

Figure 8: 2029 Background Traffic Volumes, Weekday AM and PM Peak Hours10

7

358

166

69 95

83 513

99 530 358 693 540

94 87

78 37 1 3

501 369 119

317

52 796 520

63 79

128

556

129

8 499

9 675

22 20 2

23 464

27 26 22 786

LEGEND

Traffic Signal

xx xx AM / PM Peak Hour

Yong

e St

reet

Site

Prop

osed

Site

Ac

cess

2

Innisfil Beach Road

Pioneer Gas Station Site Access

Proposed Site Access 1

Schematic; Not To Scale

Page 26: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY & SITE CIRCULATION REVIEW

Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

Figure 9: Site Traffic Assignment, Weekday AM and PM Peak Hours0 3 3 1 2

0 2 3 3 3 0 0

0 0 7 5

0 0 1 3

6 3 2 4 0 0 0 4 5

1 1 4 4 0 9 6 5 8

0 0 4 6 8

0 0 3 0 0

5 6

0 0 2

0 0 0 0 5

0 0 0 0 9 LEGEND

Traffic Signal

xx xx AM / PM Peak Hour

Yong

e St

reet

Site

Prop

osed

Site

Ac

cess

2

Innisfil Beach Road

Pioneer Gas Station Site Access

Proposed Site Access 1

Schematic; Not To Scale

Page 27: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY & SITE CIRCULATION REVIEW

Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

Figure 10: Pass-By Trip Adjustment, Weekday AM and PM Peak Hours

-7 -5

7 5

1 3

-10 -6 7 6

10 6 5 10

-4 4 4 8

-3 3

3 4

2

-4 4

-8 8 LEGEND

Traffic Signal

xx xx AM / PM Peak Hour

Yong

e St

reet

Site

Prop

osed

Site

Ac

cess

2

Innisfil Beach Road

Pioneer Gas Station Site Access

Proposed Site Access 1

Schematic; Not To Scale

Page 28: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY & SITE CIRCULATION REVIEW

Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

Figure 11: 2024 Total Traffic Volumes, Weekday AM and PM Peak Hours97 32

8

153

64 88

75 467

92 483 328 621 484

85 78 14 10

71 33 1 3

460 338 110

291

47 711 465 11 11

58 73

120

507

117 19 12 10 18

8 448 8 10 16

9 609 6 0 0

8 10

22 20 2

0 0 23 417 9

27 26 22 704

17 LEGEND

Traffic Signal

xx xx AM / PM Peak Hour

Yong

e St

reet

Site

Prop

osed

Site

Ac

cess

2

Innisfil Beach Road

Pioneer Gas Station Site Access

Proposed Site Access 1

Schematic; Not To Scale

Page 29: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY & SITE CIRCULATION REVIEW

Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

Figure 12: 2029 Total Traffic Volumes, Weekday AM and PM Peak Hours10

7

361

169

70 97

83 515

102 533 361 686 535

94 87 14 10

78 37 1 3

507 372 121

321

52 786 514 11 11

64 80

132

560

129 19 12 10 18

8 495 8 10 16

9 672 6 0 0

8 10

22 20 2

0 0 23 460 9

27 26 22 778

17 LEGEND

Traffic Signal

xx xx AM / PM Peak Hour

Yong

e St

reet

Site

Prop

osed

Site

Ac

cess

2

Innisfil Beach Road

Pioneer Gas Station Site Access

Proposed Site Access 1

Schematic; Not To Scale

Page 30: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,
Page 31: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,
Page 32: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

26

Traffic Impact Study and Site Plan Review Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Turning Movement Counts and Signal Timing Plans

Appendix B – Background Traffic Information

Appendix C – Capacity Analysis Sheets

Appendix D – Level of Service Definitions

Appendix E – Town of Innisfil Zoning By-law, Excerpts

Appendix F – Town of Innisfil Engineering Design Standards, Excerpts

Page 33: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

APPENDIX A Turning Movement Counts

Page 34: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

Ontario Traffic Inc.

Morning Peak Diagram Specified PeriodFrom:To:

6:00:00

9:00:00

One Hour PeakFrom:To:

6:45:00

7:45:00

Municipality:Site #:Intersection:TFR File #:Count date:

Innisfil

1714700004

CR 4 (Yonge St) & CR 21 (Innisfil B

1

27-Jun-17

Weather conditions:

Person(s) who counted:

** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: CR 4 (Yonge St) runs N/S

North Leg Total:

North Entering:

North Peds:

Peds Cross:

825

528

0

Heavys

Trucks

Cars

Totals

10

1

57

68

6

3

370

379

3

0

78

81

19

4

505

Heavys

Trucks

Cars

Totals

28

4

265

297

Heavys Trucks Cars Totals

34 7 560 601

Heavys Trucks Cars Totals

7 0 23 30

11 3 289 303

4 4 57 65

22 7 369

Peds Cross:

West Peds:

West Entering:

West Leg Total:

0

398

999

CR 4 (Yonge St)

CR 21 (Innisfil Beach Rd) W

N

E

S

CR 21 (Innisfil Beach Rd)

CR 4 (Yonge St)

East Leg Total:

East Entering:

East Peds:

Peds Cross:

996

569

0

Cars Trucks Heavys Totals

55 2 0 57

416 4 15 435

73 0 4 77

544 6 19

Cars Trucks Heavys Totals

406 3 18 427

Cars

Trucks

Heavys

Totals

500

7

14

521

Cars

Trucks

Heavys

Totals

87

2

9

98

187

2

21

210

39

0

4

43

313

4

34

Peds Cross:

South Peds:

South Entering:

South Leg Total:

0

351

872

Comments

Page 35: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

Ontario Traffic Inc.

Afternoon Peak Diagram Specified PeriodFrom:To:

15:00:00

18:00:00

One Hour PeakFrom:To:

15:30:00

16:30:00

Municipality:Site #:Intersection:TFR File #:Count date:

Innisfil

1714700004

CR 4 (Yonge St) & CR 21 (Innisfil B

1

27-Jun-17

Weather conditions:

Person(s) who counted:

** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: CR 4 (Yonge St) runs N/S

North Leg Total:

North Entering:

North Peds:

Peds Cross:

1116

518

0

Heavys

Trucks

Cars

Totals

5

1

82

88

7

2

285

294

1

0

135

136

13

3

502

Heavys

Trucks

Cars

Totals

6

2

590

598

Heavys Trucks Cars Totals

27 6 454 487

Heavys Trucks Cars Totals

2 0 62 64

5 3 403 411

3 2 47 52

10 5 512

Peds Cross:

West Peds:

West Entering:

West Leg Total:

0

527

1014

CR 4 (Yonge St)

CR 21 (Innisfil Beach Rd) W

N

E

S

CR 21 (Innisfil Beach Rd)

CR 4 (Yonge St)

East Leg Total:

East Entering:

East Peds:

Peds Cross:

1096

443

0

Cars Trucks Heavys Totals

78 0 0 78

277 4 13 294

70 1 0 71

425 5 13

Cars Trucks Heavys Totals

643 4 6 653

Cars

Trucks

Heavys

Totals

402

5

10

417

Cars

Trucks

Heavys

Totals

95

1

9

105

450

2

4

456

105

1

0

106

650

4

13

Peds Cross:

South Peds:

South Entering:

South Leg Total:

0

667

1084

Comments

Page 36: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

Turning Movement Count DiagramYonge Street & Pioneer Energy Gas Station Access 7:00am - 8:30am & 4:00pm - 5:30pm

Innisfil, Ontario Tuesday November 14, 2017

7:30 to 8:30 - to -

Yonge Street Yonge Street

North Total 964 East Total 0 North Total 0 East Total 0

North Entering 563 Cyclists 0 0 0 East Entering 0 North Entering 0 Cyclists 0 0 0 East Entering 0

North Receiving 401 Truck 0 23 0 East Receiving 0 North Receiving 0 Truck 0 0 0 East Receiving 0

North Peds 3 Cars 9 531 0 East Peds 0 North Peds 0 Cars 0 0 0 East Peds 0

0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

West Total 78 23 349 0 South Total 984 West Total 0 0 0 0 South Total 0

West Entering 46 0 32 0 South Entering 404 West Entering 0 0 0 0 South Entering 0

West Receiving 32 0 0 0 South Receiving 580 West Receiving 0 0 0 0 South Receiving 0

West Peds 0 South Peds 0 West Peds 0 South Peds 0

15:30 to 16:30

Yonge Street Yonge Street

North Total 1029 East Total 0 North Total 2835 East Total 0

North Entering 385 Cyclists 0 0 0 East Entering 0 North Entering 1398 Cyclists 0 0 0 East Entering 0

North Receiving 644 Truck 1 20 0 East Receiving 0 North Receiving 1437 Truck 1 61 0 East Receiving 0

North Peds 0 Cars 7 357 0 East Peds 0 North Peds 4 Cars 21 1315 0 East Peds 0

0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 0 0

West Total 79 22 595 0 South Total 1048 West Total 228 68 1286 0 South Total 2895

West Entering 49 0 27 0 South Entering 644 West Entering 138 0 89 0 South Entering 1443

West Receiving 30 0 0 0 South Receiving 404 West Receiving 90 0 0 0 South Receiving 1452

West Peds 0 South Peds 0 West Peds 1 South Peds 1

Count Hours:

Date:

AM Peak Hour: MD Peak Hour:

Intersection:

Municipality:

Total 3-Hour Count

Gas

Sta

tion

Acce

ss

Gas

Sta

tion

Acce

ss

PM Peak Hour:

Gas

Sta

tion

Acce

ss

Gas

Sta

tion

Acce

ss

Page 37: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

PROGRAM LOG Page 20-1

Manual EPAC300 Intersection Controller Unit DEC 01

20. EPAC300 PROGRAM LOG

Prepared By ..........................: ________________________________________________ Date: ____ / ____ / ____

Approved By ................................: _________________________________________________ Date: ____ / ____ / ____

Intersection Name .......................: _Simcoe Rd. 4 & Simcoe Rd. 21____________________________________________________

UTILITIES - ACCESS

Access Code ........................... : ___________ Codes: Four Digits (0000 - 9999)

PHASE DATA - VEHICLE TIMINGS

Basic Times Phase: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Minimum Green ....................... : _5_ _20 _5_ _10 ___ _20 ___ _10 ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Passage Time ......................... : _30 _50 _30 _30 ___ _50 ___ _30 ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Maximum No 1 ........................ : _22 _55 _22 _25 ___ _55 ___ _25 ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Maximum No 2 ........................ : ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Yellow Change ........................ : _40 _50 _40 _45 _40 _50 _40 _45 ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Red Clearance ........................ : _10 _18 _10 _21 ___ _18 ___ _21 ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Density Times Phase: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Seconds/Actuation .................. : ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Maximum Initial ....................... : ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Time B4 Reduction .................. : ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Cars B4 Reduction .................. : ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Time To Reduce ...................... : ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Minimum Gap .......................... : ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

PHASE DATA - PEDESTRIAN TIMINGS & CONTROL

Pedestrian Times Phase: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Walk ........................................ : ___ _15 ___ _14 ___ _15 ___ _14 ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Pedestrian Clearance .............. : ___ _5_ ___ _5_ ___ _5_ ___ _5_ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Pedestrian Control Phase: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Flashing Walk .......................... : ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Extended Pedestrian Clear ..... : ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Act Rest In Walk ...................... : ___ _1_ ___ ___ ___ _1_ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Pedestrian Control Entry: “1” = Yes & “0” = No

PHASE DATA - VEHICLE CONTROL

Veh Control Phase: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Non-Lock Memory ................... : _1_ _1_ _1_ _1_ ___ _1_ _1_ _1_ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Dual Entry ................................ : ___ _1_ ___ _1_ ___ _1_ ___ _1_ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Last Car Passage .................... : ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Conditional Service ................. : ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

No Simultaneous Gap ............. : ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Vehicle Control Entry: “1” = Yes & “0” = No

Page 38: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

APPENDIX B Background Traffic Information

Page 39: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

Co

un

ty o

f S

imco

e

Tran

spo

rtat

ion

& E

ng

inee

rin

g

An

nu

al A

vera

ge

Dai

ly T

raff

ic S

um

mar

y (

A.A

.D.T

.)U

pdat

ed N

ov 2

016

Roa

d# -

Sect

ion

#D

ista

nce

Link

Des

crip

tion

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

CR

27

001-

016.

14,

300

4,10

03,

900

4,30

015

th S

R N

ew T

ecum

seth

001-

022.

04,

900

4,70

04,

400

4,70

0Ea

st L

imits

/ B

eeto

n00

1-03

1.9

4,90

04,

500

4,40

04,

600

CR

10

001-

043.

13,

000

3,20

02,

400

3,30

0Ad

j/Tos

Tow

nlin

e00

1-04

A2.

9N

/AN

/A2,

800

4,00

0C

R 5

000

1-05

7.2

1,80

01,

900

1,90

02,

400

Sim

coe

Boun

dary

CR

39

003-

013.

14,

400

4,70

04,

100

6,00

0C

R 4

Brad

ford

Lim

its00

4-01

9.8

12,7

0012

,500

14,8

0018

,400

CR

89

/ CR

300

4-02

4.4

9,60

09,

200

11,5

0011

,300

Line

4 /

Chu

rchi

ll00

4-03

5.5

10,1

009,

000

10,8

0011

,200

CR

21

004-

042.

811

,200

11,2

0011

,900

12,0

00Vi

ctor

ia S

t. / S

troud

004-

052.

911

,700

13,0

0013

,600

14,1

00Lo

ckha

rt D

r. / B

arrie

Lim

it

CR

15

005-

014.

13,

800

4,10

04,

000

4,50

0C

R 1

300

5-02

5.6

1,70

02,

400

1,80

02,

500

Cou

nty

Boun

dary

CR

27

N00

6-01

5.5

4,40

04,

600

4,60

0C

onc

4 / T

iny

006-

028.

23,

700

4,20

04,

400

CR

25

/ Per

kins

field

006-

031.

44,

400

4,70

05,

000

Con

c 11

/ Tin

y00

6-04

2.8

3,40

03,

900

4,30

0C

onc

13 /

Tiny

006-

054.

13,

100

3,20

03,

600

CR

26

Page

1 o

f 9

11,2

0011

,200

11,9

0012

,000

004-

042.

8

Page 40: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

Roa

d# -

Sect

ion

#D

ista

nce

Link

Des

crip

tion

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

CR

39

021-

013.

09,

800

11,1

0012

,200

14,7

00C

R 4

021-

023.

111

,400

11,8

0011

,800

13,9

00C

R 5

4 (1

0th

SR)

021-

032.

213

,800

14,0

0013

,700

18,3

00H

wy

400

021-

040.

611

,700

13,1

0013

,200

17,0

005t

h SR

Inni

sfil

021-

053.

09,

000

9,00

09,

300

11,1

00C

R 2

702

1-06

6.4

5,10

05,

700

6,00

07,

400

CR

56

021-

074.

25,

700

6,10

06,

300

6,80

0C

R10

021-

084.

23,

600

4,70

04,

900

5,70

0C

R 1

5

Hw

y 12

022-

019.

64,

600

4,30

04,

600

Cou

lson

/ 7th

Lin

e02

2-02

4.9

4,60

04,

300

4,60

0H

orse

shoe

Val

ley

Res

ort E

nt.

022-

035.

26,

200

5,50

05,

300

CR

93

022-

041.

46,

200

5,80

06,

300

Hw

y 40

002

2-05

4.6

5,30

05,

600

6,10

0C

R 2

702

2-06

2.6

4,40

04,

400

4,60

0W

ilson

Driv

e - A

nten

Mills

022-

073.

93,

900

3,90

04,

100

CR

29

022-

080.

55,

200

6,20

06,

400

Hw

y 26

Hw

y 40

002

3-01

4.7

1,60

01,

800

2,80

0G

erva

is R

d02

3-02

5.6

1,70

01,

900

2,80

0C

R 5

802

3-03

5.0

1,80

01,

900

2,20

0H

wy

93

CR

93

025-

012.

95,

700

5,90

06,

000

2nd

Con

c / B

asel

ine

Rd

025-

023.

24,

300

4,20

04,

300

CR

6

Rob

ert S

t / P

enet

ang

026-

014.

32,

400

2,40

02,

500

16th

Con

c02

6-02

3.1

2,10

02,

100

2,10

0C

R 6

026-

033.

02,

800

2,70

02,

800

Ced

ar P

oint

Rd

- 19/

18 S

R

Page

4 o

f 9

021-

013.

09,

800

11,1

0012

,200

14,7

00

Page 41: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

AADT Growth Calculation

Review of Traffic Volume Growth on Yonge Street, north of Innisfil Beach Road

Year AADT xy x^2 Growth by Annual(vehicles) Linear Growth

Regression Rate2010 11,200 22512000 4040100 113002013 11,900 23954700 4052169 117002016 12,000 24192000 4064256 12100 1.2%6039 35100 70658700 12156525

Source: County of Simcoe, AADT Summary, dated Nov 2016, Station 004-04

events 3m 133.3333333b -256700

Review of Traffic Volume Growth on Innisfil Beach Road, east of Yonge Street

Year AADT xy x^2 Growth by Annual(vehicles) Linear Growth

Regression Rate2010 11,100 22311000 4040100 108672013 12,200 24558600 4052169 126672016 14,700 29635200 4064256 14467 5.5%6039 38000 76504800 12156525

Source: County of Simcoe, AADT Summary, dated Nov 2016, Station 021-01

events 3m 600b -1195133.333

Page 42: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

Stroud Centreville Town of Innisfil

Traffic Impact Study for

Daycore Venture Group Inc.

Type of Document: Final Report

Project Number: JDE – 1637

Date Submitted: August 19

th, 2016

Revised: May 8th, 2017

_______________________________________ 05/08/17 John Northcote, P.Eng. Professional License #: 100124071

JD Northcote Engineering Inc. 86 Cumberland Street

Barrie, ON 705.725.4035

www.JDEngineering.ca

Page 43: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

Daycore Venture Group Inc. Stroud Centreville

JDE-1637 Date: May 8

th, 2017

13

Table 11 – Estimated Traffic Generation of Proposed Development

AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL

TOTAL SITE GENERATION 84 110 194 163 146 309

INTERNAL CAPTURE -14 -15 -29 -43 -43 -86

NET SITE GENERATION 70 95 165 120 103 223

PASS-BY TRIPS -34 -34 -68 -46 -46 -92

TOTAL PRIMARY SITE 36 61 97 74 57 131

4.2 Traffic Assignment

The ITE data provides the anticipated percentage of new residential traffic entering and exiting during the peak hour. The distribution of the residential traffic beyond the local area has been calculated based on the 2011 Transportation Tomorrow Survey [TTS] data for zone 8590 retrieved using the Internet Data Retrieval System [IDRS] (excerpt attached as Appendix H). TTS data provides historical origin and destination work trip percentages for specific areas within the County and the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area [GTHA]. The distribution of traffic entering at each Site Access location is based on our review of the internal parking and building layout, in conjunction with the external traffic distribution. Traffic distribution for the trips generated by the residential component of the subject site during the AM and PM peak hour is expected to generally follow commuter travel patterns. Our analysis is based on the egressing traffic during the AM peak hour. Logically, the distribution of ingress traffic will follow the inverse of the exiting traffic distribution. For each of the individual areas identified in the TTS data, we have selected the probable route of travel, assuming that people will select their route primarily based on travel time. Table 12 illustrates the calculation of the distribution of ingress and egress traffic for the residential components of the development.

Table 12 – Proposed Residential Traffic Distribution Summary

Scenario

Ingress Traffic Direction Egress Traffic Direction

No

rth

bo

un

d

Via

Yong

e S

treet

So

uth

bo

un

d

Via

Yong

e S

treet

Eastb

ou

nd

via

Vic

tori

a S

treet

Westb

ou

nd

via

Vic

tori

a S

treet

No

rth

bo

un

d

Via

Yong

e S

treet

So

uth

bo

un

d

Via

Yong

e S

treet

Eastb

ou

nd

via

Vic

tori

a S

treet

Westb

ou

nd

via

Vic

tori

a S

treet

AM / PM Peak Hour

35.6% 23.7% 20.5% 20.3% 23.7% 35.6% 20.3% 20.5%

The traffic distribution pattern for residential development traffic is illustrated in Figure 8 in Appendix B respectively for the AM and PM peak hour. The distribution of traffic for the commercial and gas station component of this development is assumed to follow the distribution of the existing traffic volumes within the study area. Table 13 illustrates the calculation of the distribution of ingress and egress traffic for the commercial components of the development.

Page 44: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

(12) 7

(18) 1

8

(6) 7

Traffic Volume

AM (PM)

Travel Movement

Traffic Signal

Stop Control

Stop Sign

LEGEND:

20 (10)

(10) 3

(0) 0(9) 4

(-3) 2

(1) 6

0 (0

)

11 (2

7)

1 (5

)

9 (11)

- 4 (-1)

0 (0) 10 (4)

0 (0)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

(5) 1

(5) 2

2 (8)

2 (2)

(2) 1

0

(2) 8

0 (0

)

24 (4

7)

(0) 0

(36) 3

2

0 (0)

0 (0)

(10) 1

(9) 2

(27) 3

0

(6) 3

21 (3

5)

3 (1

2)

(37) 28

(0) 0

(43) 46

0 (0

)

-10 (-1

2)

32 (5

7)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

(0) 0

(-10) -1

3

(32) 2

9

Page 45: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY & SITE CIRCULATION REVIEW

Proposed Gas Station and Convenience Store

7367 Yonge Street, Innisfil, ON

Background Dev - Proposed Mixed-Use Development, 7958 Yonge StreetSource: Traffic Impact Study, dated May 8, 2017, prepared by JD Northcote Engineering Inc.

3 11 5 2 4

3 17 4 2 4

4 2 1 3

8 5 4

24

1117

2

824 LEGEND

Traffic Signal

xx xx AM / PM Peak Hour

Yong

e St

reet

Site

Prop

osed

Site

Ac

cess

2

Innisfil Beach Road

Pioneer Gas Station Existing Site Access

Proposed Site Access 1

Schematic; Not To Scale

Page 46: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

PM

-2

KE

Y P

LA

N

CO

UN

TY

OF S

IMC

OE

SIM

CO

E R

OA

DS

21 &

4IN

TE

RS

EC

TIO

N I

MP

RO

VE

ME

NTS

SIM

CO

E R

OA

D 4

SIMCOE ROAD 21 SIMCOE ROAD 21

Page 47: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,
Page 48: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

APPENDIX CCapacity Analysis Sheets

Page 49: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

Existing Condition

Page 50: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 1

Lane

Gro

upEB

LEB

TW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)30

303

7743

557

9826

043

8142

168

Turn

Typ

ePe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Perm

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPr

otec

ted

Phas

es4

38

21

6Pe

rmitt

ed P

hase

s4

88

22

66

Det

ecto

r Pha

se4

43

88

22

21

66

Switc

h Ph

ase

Min

imum

Initi

al (s

)10

.010

.05.

010

.010

.020

.020

.020

.05.

020

.020

.0M

inim

um S

plit

(s)

25.6

25.6

10.0

26.0

26.0

26.8

26.8

26.8

10.0

27.0

27.0

Tota

l Spl

it (s

)25

.625

.622

.047

.647

.655

.055

.055

.022

.077

.077

.0To

tal S

plit

(%)

20.5

%20

.5%

17.7

%38

.2%

38.2

%44

.1%

44.1

%44

.1%

17.7

%61

.8%

61.8

%Ye

llow

Tim

e (s

)4.

54.

54.

04.

54.

55.

05.

05.

04.

05.

05.

0Al

l-Red

Tim

e (s

)2.

12.

11.

02.

12.

11.

81.

81.

81.

01.

81.

8Lo

st T

ime

Adju

st (s

)0.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

0To

tal L

ost T

ime

(s)

6.6

6.6

5.0

6.6

6.6

6.8

6.8

6.8

5.0

6.8

6.8

Lead

/Lag

Lag

Lag

Lead

Lag

Lag

Lag

Lead

Lead

-Lag

Opt

imiz

e?Ye

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sR

ecal

l Mod

eN

one

Non

eN

one

Non

eN

one

Max

Max

Max

Non

eM

axM

axAc

t Effc

t Gre

en (s

)21

.821

.835

.433

.833

.859

.959

.959

.972

.270

.470

.4Ac

tuat

ed g

/C R

atio

0.19

0.19

0.30

0.29

0.29

0.51

0.51

0.51

0.61

0.60

0.60

v/c

Rat

io0.

380.

970.

410.

870.

120.

230.

310.

060.

140.

400.

08C

ontro

l Del

ay58

.785

.335

.857

.87.

921

.220

.712

.711

.114

.73.

0Q

ueue

Del

ay0.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

0To

tal D

elay

58.7

85.3

35.8

57.8

7.9

21.2

20.7

12.7

11.1

14.7

3.0

LOS

EF

DE

AC

CB

BB

AAp

proa

ch D

elay

83.3

49.8

19.9

12.8

Appr

oach

LO

SF

DB

B

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yC

ycle

Len

gth:

124

.6Ac

tuat

ed C

ycle

Len

gth:

117

.7N

atur

al C

ycle

: 75

Con

trol T

ype:

Sem

i Act

-Unc

oord

Max

imum

v/c

Rat

io: 0

.97

Inte

rsec

tion

Sign

al D

elay

: 39.

6In

ters

ectio

n LO

S: D

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Util

izat

ion

92.4

%IC

U L

evel

of S

ervi

ce F

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

) 15

Split

s an

d Ph

ases

:

1: In

nisf

il Be

ach

Roa

d &

Yong

e St

reet

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 2

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

TEB

RW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)30

303

6577

435

5798

260

4381

421

68Id

eal F

low

(vph

pl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Tota

l Los

t tim

e (s

)6.

66.

65.

06.

66.

66.

86.

86.

85.

06.

86.

8La

ne U

til. F

acto

r1.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

00Fr

t1.

001.

001.

001.

000.

851.

001.

000.

851.

001.

000.

85Fl

t Pro

tect

ed0.

951.

000.

951.

001.

000.

951.

001.

000.

951.

001.

00Sa

td. F

low

(pro

t)15

0421

2517

1918

2715

5316

4117

1214

9517

3618

6314

04Fl

t Per

mitt

ed0.

291.

000.

151.

001.

000.

511.

001.

000.

511.

001.

00Sa

td. F

low

(per

m)

454

2125

270

1827

1553

874

1712

1495

931

1863

1404

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor,

PHF

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

Adj.

Flow

(vph

)32

319

6881

458

6010

327

445

8544

372

RTO

R R

educ

tion

(vph

)0

60

00

430

010

00

29La

ne G

roup

Flo

w (v

ph)

3238

10

8145

817

103

274

3685

443

43H

eavy

Veh

icle

s (%

)20

%5%

10%

5%4%

4%10

%11

%8%

4%2%

15%

Turn

Typ

ePe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Perm

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPr

otec

ted

Phas

es4

38

21

6Pe

rmitt

ed P

hase

s4

88

22

66

Actu

ated

Gre

en, G

(s)

21.8

21.8

34.9

34.9

34.9

59.9

59.9

59.9

71.5

71.5

71.5

Effe

ctiv

e G

reen

, g (s

)21

.821

.834

.934

.934

.959

.959

.959

.971

.571

.571

.5Ac

tuat

ed g

/C R

atio

0.18

0.18

0.29

0.29

0.29

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.60

0.60

0.60

Cle

aran

ce T

ime

(s)

6.6

6.6

5.0

6.6

6.6

6.8

6.8

6.8

5.0

6.8

6.8

Vehi

cle

Exte

nsio

n (s

)3.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

8338

717

753

245

243

785

674

860

011

1283

8v/

s R

atio

Pro

tc0

.18

0.03

c0.2

50.

160.

01c0

.24

v/s

Rat

io P

erm

0.07

0.10

0.01

0.12

0.02

0.08

0.03

v/c

Rat

io0.

390.

990.

460.

860.

040.

240.

320.

050.

140.

400.

05U

nifo

rm D

elay

, d1

43.1

48.8

33.8

40.2

30.4

17.0

17.8

15.3

10.6

12.8

10.0

Prog

ress

ion

Fact

or1.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

00In

crem

enta

l Del

ay, d

23.

041

.51.

913

.40.

01.

31.

00.

10.

11.

10.

1D

elay

(s)

46.1

90.3

35.7

53.5

30.5

18.2

18.8

15.5

10.7

13.8

10.2

Leve

l of S

ervi

ceD

FD

DC

BB

BB

BB

Appr

oach

Del

ay (s

)86

.948

.818

.313

.0Ap

proa

ch L

OS

FD

BB

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yH

CM

Ave

rage

Con

trol D

elay

39.8

HC

M L

evel

of S

ervi

ceD

HC

M V

olum

e to

Cap

acity

ratio

0.59

Actu

ated

Cyc

le L

engt

h (s

) 11

9.8

Sum

of l

ost t

ime

(s)

20.0

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Util

izat

ion

92.4

%IC

U L

evel

of S

ervi

ceF

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

c

Crit

ical

Lan

e G

roup

Page 51: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 3

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

RN

BLN

BTSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(veh

/h)

2026

2338

155

49

Sign

Con

trol

Stop

Free

Free

Gra

de0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

Hou

rly fl

ow ra

te (v

ph)

2127

2440

158

39

Pede

stria

nsLa

ne W

idth

(m)

Wal

king

Spe

ed (m

/s)

Perc

ent B

lock

age

Rig

ht tu

rn fl

are

(veh

)M

edia

n ty

peN

one

Non

eM

edia

n st

orag

e ve

h)U

pstre

am s

igna

l (m

)49

pX, p

lato

on u

nblo

cked

0.84

0.84

0.84

vC, c

onfli

ctin

g vo

lum

e10

3758

859

3vC

1, s

tage

1 c

onf v

olvC

2, s

tage

2 c

onf v

olvC

u, u

nblo

cked

vol

950

416

422

tC, s

ingl

e (s

)6.

46.

24.

1tC

, 2 s

tage

(s)

tF (s

)3.

53.

32.

2p0

que

ue fr

ee %

9195

97cM

cap

acity

(veh

/h)

237

536

957

Dire

ctio

n, L

ane

#EB

1N

B 1

NB

2SB

1Vo

lum

e To

tal

4824

401

593

Volu

me

Left

2124

00

Volu

me

Rig

ht27

00

9cS

H34

695

717

0017

00Vo

lum

e to

Cap

acity

0.14

0.03

0.24

0.35

Que

ue L

engt

h 95

th (m

)3.

40.

50.

00.

0C

ontro

l Del

ay (s

)17

.18.

90.

00.

0La

ne L

OS

CA

Appr

oach

Del

ay (s

)17

.10.

50.

0Ap

proa

ch L

OS

C

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yAv

erag

e D

elay

1.

0In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity U

tiliz

atio

n 39

.7%

ICU

Lev

el o

f Ser

vice

A

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 1

Lane

Gro

upEB

LEB

TW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)64

411

7129

478

105

456

106

136

294

88Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPe

rmPe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Prot

ecte

d Ph

ases

43

82

16

Perm

itted

Pha

ses

48

82

26

6D

etec

tor P

hase

44

38

82

22

16

6Sw

itch

Phas

eM

inim

um In

itial

(s)

10.0

10.0

5.0

10.0

10.0

20.0

20.0

20.0

5.0

20.0

20.0

Min

imum

Spl

it (s

)25

.625

.610

.026

.026

.026

.826

.826

.810

.027

.027

.0To

tal S

plit

(s)

25.6

25.6

22.0

47.6

47.6

55.0

55.0

55.0

22.0

77.0

77.0

Tota

l Spl

it (%

)20

.5%

20.5

%17

.7%

38.2

%38

.2%

44.1

%44

.1%

44.1

%17

.7%

61.8

%61

.8%

Yello

w T

ime

(s)

4.5

4.5

4.0

4.5

4.5

5.0

5.0

5.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

All-R

ed T

ime

(s)

2.1

2.1

1.0

2.1

2.1

1.8

1.8

1.8

1.0

1.8

1.8

Lost

Tim

e Ad

just

(s)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Tota

l Los

t Tim

e (s

)6.

66.

65.

06.

66.

66.

86.

86.

85.

06.

86.

8Le

ad/L

agLa

gLa

gLe

adLa

gLa

gLa

gLe

adLe

ad-L

ag O

ptim

ize?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Rec

all M

ode

Non

eN

one

Non

eN

one

Non

eM

axM

axM

axN

one

Max

Max

Act E

ffct G

reen

(s)

19.1

19.1

32.2

30.5

30.5

56.1

56.1

56.1

72.2

70.4

70.4

Actu

ated

g/C

Rat

io0.

170.

170.

280.

270.

270.

490.

490.

490.

630.

620.

62v/

c R

atio

0.38

0.97

0.36

0.64

0.17

0.22

0.52

0.14

0.29

0.27

0.10

Con

trol D

elay

51.5

82.7

35.3

43.4

7.5

20.3

24.0

14.2

11.0

11.7

2.4

Que

ue D

elay

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Tota

l Del

ay51

.582

.735

.343

.47.

520

.324

.014

.211

.011

.72.

4LO

SD

FD

DA

CC

BB

BA

Appr

oach

Del

ay78

.835

.821

.99.

9Ap

proa

ch L

OS

ED

CA

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yC

ycle

Len

gth:

124

.6Ac

tuat

ed C

ycle

Len

gth:

114

.4N

atur

al C

ycle

: 75

Con

trol T

ype:

Sem

i Act

-Unc

oord

Max

imum

v/c

Rat

io: 0

.97

Inte

rsec

tion

Sign

al D

elay

: 35.

8In

ters

ectio

n LO

S: D

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Util

izat

ion

83.3

%IC

U L

evel

of S

ervi

ce E

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

) 15

Split

s an

d Ph

ases

:

1: In

nisf

il Be

ach

Roa

d &

Yong

e St

reet

Page 52: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 2

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

TEB

RW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)64

411

5271

294

7810

545

610

613

629

488

Idea

l Flo

w (v

phpl

)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00To

tal L

ost t

ime

(s)

6.6

6.6

5.0

6.6

6.6

6.8

6.8

6.8

5.0

6.8

6.8

Lane

Util

. Fac

tor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Frt

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rote

cted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd

. Flo

w (p

rot)

1752

2950

1787

1792

1599

1641

1863

1599

1787

1845

1509

Flt P

erm

itted

0.57

1.00

0.17

1.00

1.00

0.57

1.00

1.00

0.33

1.00

1.00

Satd

. Flo

w (p

erm

)10

5918

4731

217

9215

9999

118

6315

9962

918

4515

09Pe

ak-h

our f

acto

r, PH

F0.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

96Ad

j. Fl

ow (v

ph)

6742

854

7430

681

109

475

110

142

306

92R

TOR

Red

uctio

n (v

ph)

03

00

059

00

140

036

Lane

Gro

up F

low

(vph

)67

479

074

306

2210

947

596

142

306

56H

eavy

Veh

icle

s (%

)3%

2%10

%1%

6%1%

10%

2%1%

1%3%

7%Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPe

rmPe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Prot

ecte

d Ph

ases

43

82

16

Perm

itted

Pha

ses

48

82

26

6Ac

tuat

ed G

reen

, G (s

)19

.119

.131

.731

.731

.756

.156

.156

.170

.470

.470

.4Ef

fect

ive

Gre

en, g

(s)

19.1

19.1

31.7

31.7

31.7

56.1

56.1

56.1

70.4

70.4

70.4

Actu

ated

g/C

Rat

io0.

170.

170.

270.

270.

270.

490.

490.

490.

610.

610.

61C

lear

ance

Tim

e (s

)6.

66.

65.

06.

66.

66.

86.

86.

85.

06.

86.

8Ve

hicl

e Ex

tens

ion

(s)

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)17

548

818

349

243

948

190

577

747

711

2592

0v/

s R

atio

Pro

tc0

.16

0.03

c0.1

7c0

.26

0.02

c0.1

7v/

s R

atio

Per

m0.

060.

080.

010.

110.

060.

160.

04v/

c R

atio

0.38

0.98

0.40

0.62

0.05

0.23

0.52

0.12

0.30

0.27

0.06

Uni

form

Del

ay, d

142

.948

.033

.536

.730

.817

.220

.516

.311

.510

.69.

1Pr

ogre

ssio

n Fa

ctor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incr

emen

tal D

elay

, d2

1.4

35.6

1.5

2.4

0.0

1.1

2.2

0.3

0.4

0.6

0.1

Del

ay (s

)44

.383

.635

.039

.130

.918

.322

.716

.611

.911

.29.

3Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DF

CD

CB

CB

BB

AAp

proa

ch D

elay

(s)

78.8

37.0

21.0

11.0

Appr

oach

LO

SE

DC

B

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yH

CM

Ave

rage

Con

trol D

elay

36.0

HC

M L

evel

of S

ervi

ceD

HC

M V

olum

e to

Cap

acity

ratio

0.65

Actu

ated

Cyc

le L

engt

h (s

) 11

5.5

Sum

of l

ost t

ime

(s)

26.8

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Util

izat

ion

83.3

%IC

U L

evel

of S

ervi

ceE

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

c

Crit

ical

Lan

e G

roup

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 3

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

RN

BLN

BTSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(veh

/h)

2227

2264

540

98

Sign

Con

trol

Stop

Free

Free

Gra

de0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

Hou

rly fl

ow ra

te (v

ph)

2328

2367

242

68

Pede

stria

nsLa

ne W

idth

(m)

Wal

king

Spe

ed (m

/s)

Perc

ent B

lock

age

Rig

ht tu

rn fl

are

(veh

)M

edia

n ty

peN

one

Non

eM

edia

n st

orag

e ve

h)U

pstre

am s

igna

l (m

)49

pX, p

lato

on u

nblo

cked

0.89

0.89

0.89

vC, c

onfli

ctin

g vo

lum

e11

4843

043

4vC

1, s

tage

1 c

onf v

olvC

2, s

tage

2 c

onf v

olvC

u, u

nblo

cked

vol

1106

304

309

tC, s

ingl

e (s

)6.

46.

24.

1tC

, 2 s

tage

(s)

tF (s

)3.

53.

32.

2p0

que

ue fr

ee %

8996

98cM

cap

acity

(veh

/h)

204

658

1120

Dire

ctio

n, L

ane

#EB

1N

B 1

NB

2SB

1Vo

lum

e To

tal

5123

672

434

Volu

me

Left

2323

00

Volu

me

Rig

ht28

00

8cS

H32

911

2017

0017

00Vo

lum

e to

Cap

acity

0.16

0.02

0.40

0.26

Que

ue L

engt

h 95

th (m

)3.

80.

40.

00.

0C

ontro

l Del

ay (s

)17

.98.

30.

00.

0La

ne L

OS

CA

Appr

oach

Del

ay (s

)17

.90.

30.

0Ap

proa

ch L

OS

C

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yAv

erag

e D

elay

0.

9In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity U

tiliz

atio

n 43

.9%

ICU

Lev

el o

f Ser

vice

A

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

Page 53: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2024 Future Background and Total Conditions

Page 54: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 1

Lane

Gro

upEB

LEB

TW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)33

335

8548

063

108

287

4789

465

75Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPe

rmPe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Prot

ecte

d Ph

ases

43

82

16

Perm

itted

Pha

ses

48

82

26

6D

etec

tor P

hase

44

38

82

22

16

6Sw

itch

Phas

eM

inim

um In

itial

(s)

10.0

10.0

5.0

10.0

10.0

20.0

20.0

20.0

5.0

20.0

20.0

Min

imum

Spl

it (s

)25

.625

.610

.026

.026

.026

.826

.826

.810

.027

.027

.0To

tal S

plit

(s)

25.6

25.6

22.0

47.6

47.6

55.0

55.0

55.0

22.0

77.0

77.0

Tota

l Spl

it (%

)20

.5%

20.5

%17

.7%

38.2

%38

.2%

44.1

%44

.1%

44.1

%17

.7%

61.8

%61

.8%

Yello

w T

ime

(s)

4.5

4.5

4.0

4.5

4.5

5.0

5.0

5.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

All-R

ed T

ime

(s)

2.1

2.1

1.0

2.1

2.1

1.8

1.8

1.8

1.0

1.8

1.8

Lost

Tim

e Ad

just

(s)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Tota

l Los

t Tim

e (s

)6.

66.

65.

06.

66.

66.

86.

86.

85.

06.

86.

8Le

ad/L

agLa

gLa

gLe

adLa

gLa

gLa

gLe

adLe

ad-L

ag O

ptim

ize?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Rec

all M

ode

Non

eN

one

Non

eN

one

Non

eM

axM

axM

axN

one

Max

Max

Act E

ffct G

reen

(s)

17.7

17.7

34.6

33.0

33.0

56.9

56.9

56.9

72.1

70.3

70.3

Actu

ated

g/C

Rat

io0.

150.

150.

300.

280.

280.

490.

490.

490.

620.

600.

60v/

c R

atio

0.33

0.81

0.40

0.50

0.14

0.31

0.19

0.07

0.16

0.22

0.09

Con

trol D

elay

54.6

59.1

35.9

36.7

7.9

22.5

18.2

5.4

10.5

11.5

2.7

Que

ue D

elay

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Tota

l Del

ay54

.659

.135

.936

.77.

922

.518

.25.

410

.511

.52.

7LO

SD

ED

DA

CB

AB

BA

Appr

oach

Del

ay58

.733

.717

.910

.3Ap

proa

ch L

OS

EC

BB

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yC

ycle

Len

gth:

124

.6Ac

tuat

ed C

ycle

Len

gth:

116

.7N

atur

al C

ycle

: 75

Con

trol T

ype:

Sem

i Act

-Unc

oord

Max

imum

v/c

Rat

io: 0

.81

Inte

rsec

tion

Sign

al D

elay

: 28.

7In

ters

ectio

n LO

S: C

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Util

izat

ion

77.3

%IC

U L

evel

of S

ervi

ce D

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

) 15

Split

s an

d Ph

ases

:

1: In

nisf

il Be

ach

Roa

d &

Yong

e St

reet

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 2

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

TEB

RW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)33

335

7285

480

6310

828

747

8946

575

Idea

l Flo

w (v

phpl

)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00La

ne W

idth

3.

03.

83.

83.

03.

83.

53.

03.

83.

53.

03.

83.

5To

tal L

ost t

ime

(s)

6.6

6.6

5.0

6.6

6.6

6.8

6.8

6.8

5.0

6.8

6.8

Lane

Util

. Fac

tor

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.97

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rote

cted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd

. Flo

w (p

rot)

1404

3392

1604

3548

1536

1532

3325

1479

1620

3618

1389

Flt P

erm

itted

0.47

1.00

0.22

1.00

1.00

0.47

1.00

1.00

0.52

1.00

1.00

Satd

. Flo

w (p

erm

)68

933

9237

735

4815

3676

433

2514

7989

036

1813

89Pe

ak-h

our f

acto

r, PH

F0.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

95Ad

j. Fl

ow (v

ph)

3535

376

8950

566

114

302

4994

489

79R

TOR

Red

uctio

n (v

ph)

014

00

047

00

250

031

Lane

Gro

up F

low

(vph

)35

415

089

505

1911

430

224

9448

948

Hea

vy V

ehic

les

(%)

20%

5%10

%5%

4%4%

10%

11%

8%4%

2%15

%Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPe

rmPe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Prot

ecte

d Ph

ases

43

82

16

Perm

itted

Pha

ses

48

82

26

6Ac

tuat

ed G

reen

, G (s

)17

.717

.733

.033

.033

.057

.057

.057

.070

.370

.370

.3Ef

fect

ive

Gre

en, g

(s)

17.7

17.7

33.0

33.0

33.0

57.0

57.0

57.0

70.3

70.3

70.3

Actu

ated

g/C

Rat

io0.

150.

150.

280.

280.

280.

490.

490.

490.

600.

600.

60C

lear

ance

Tim

e (s

)6.

66.

65.

06.

66.

66.

86.

86.

85.

06.

86.

8Ve

hicl

e Ex

tens

ion

(s)

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)10

551

421

510

0343

437

316

2472

258

821

7983

7v/

s R

atio

Pro

tc0

.12

0.04

c0.1

40.

090.

01c0

.14

v/s

Rat

io P

erm

0.05

0.08

0.01

c0.1

50.

020.

080.

03v/

c R

atio

0.33

0.81

0.41

0.50

0.04

0.31

0.19

0.03

0.16

0.22

0.06

Uni

form

Del

ay, d

144

.247

.832

.535

.030

.417

.916

.815

.59.

910

.79.

6Pr

ogre

ssio

n Fa

ctor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incr

emen

tal D

elay

, d2

1.9

9.0

1.3

0.4

0.0

2.1

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

Del

ay (s

)46

.156

.833

.835

.430

.420

.117

.015

.610

.010

.99.

7Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DE

CD

CC

BB

BB

AAp

proa

ch D

elay

(s)

56.0

34.7

17.6

10.6

Appr

oach

LO

SE

CB

B

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yH

CM

Ave

rage

Con

trol D

elay

28.5

HC

M L

evel

of S

ervi

ceC

HC

M V

olum

e to

Cap

acity

ratio

0.45

Actu

ated

Cyc

le L

engt

h (s

) 11

6.7

Sum

of l

ost t

ime

(s)

26.8

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Util

izat

ion

77.3

%IC

U L

evel

of S

ervi

ceD

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

c

Crit

ical

Lan

e G

roup

Page 55: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 3

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

RN

BLN

BTSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(veh

/h)

2026

2342

161

29

Sign

Con

trol

Stop

Free

Free

Gra

de0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

Hou

rly fl

ow ra

te (v

ph)

2127

2444

364

49

Pede

stria

nsLa

ne W

idth

(m)

Wal

king

Spe

ed (m

/s)

Perc

ent B

lock

age

Rig

ht tu

rn fl

are

(veh

)M

edia

n ty

peN

one

Non

eM

edia

n st

orag

e ve

h)U

pstre

am s

igna

l (m

)49

pX, p

lato

on u

nblo

cked

0.94

0.94

0.94

vC, c

onfli

ctin

g vo

lum

e91

932

765

4vC

1, s

tage

1 c

onf v

olvC

2, s

tage

2 c

onf v

olvC

u, u

nblo

cked

vol

784

153

501

tC, s

ingl

e (s

)6.

86.

94.

1tC

, 2 s

tage

(s)

tF (s

)3.

53.

32.

2p0

que

ue fr

ee %

9397

98cM

cap

acity

(veh

/h)

303

813

995

Dire

ctio

n, L

ane

#EB

1N

B 1

NB

2N

B 3

SB 1

SB 2

Volu

me

Tota

l48

2422

222

242

922

4Vo

lum

e Le

ft21

240

00

0Vo

lum

e R

ight

270

00

09

cSH

469

995

1700

1700

1700

1700

Volu

me

to C

apac

ity0.

100.

020.

130.

130.

250.

13Q

ueue

Len

gth

95th

(m)

2.4

0.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Con

trol D

elay

(s)

13.6

8.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Lane

LO

SB

AAp

proa

ch D

elay

(s)

13.6

0.5

0.0

Appr

oach

LO

SB

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yAv

erag

e D

elay

0.

7In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity U

tiliz

atio

n 29

.1%

ICU

Lev

el o

f Ser

vice

A

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 1

Lane

Gro

upEB

LEB

TW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)71

454

7832

586

116

503

117

150

325

97Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPe

rmPe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Prot

ecte

d Ph

ases

43

82

16

Perm

itted

Pha

ses

48

82

26

6D

etec

tor P

hase

44

38

82

22

16

6Sw

itch

Phas

eM

inim

um In

itial

(s)

10.0

10.0

5.0

10.0

10.0

20.0

20.0

20.0

5.0

20.0

20.0

Min

imum

Spl

it (s

)25

.625

.610

.026

.026

.026

.826

.826

.810

.027

.027

.0To

tal S

plit

(s)

30.6

30.6

22.0

52.6

52.6

50.0

50.0

50.0

22.0

72.0

72.0

Tota

l Spl

it (%

)24

.6%

24.6

%17

.7%

42.2

%42

.2%

40.1

%40

.1%

40.1

%17

.7%

57.8

%57

.8%

Yello

w T

ime

(s)

4.5

4.5

4.0

4.5

4.5

5.0

5.0

5.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

All-R

ed T

ime

(s)

2.1

2.1

1.0

2.1

2.1

1.8

1.8

1.8

1.0

1.8

1.8

Lost

Tim

e Ad

just

(s)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Tota

l Los

t Tim

e (s

)6.

66.

65.

06.

66.

66.

86.

86.

85.

06.

86.

8Le

ad/L

agLa

gLa

gLe

adLa

gLa

gLa

gLe

adLe

ad-L

ag O

ptim

ize?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Rec

all M

ode

Non

eN

one

Non

eN

one

Non

eM

axM

axM

axN

one

Max

Max

Act E

ffct G

reen

(s)

20.8

20.8

34.0

32.4

32.4

50.3

50.3

50.3

67.6

65.8

65.8

Actu

ated

g/C

Rat

io0.

190.

190.

300.

290.

290.

450.

450.

450.

610.

590.

59v/

c R

atio

0.42

0.80

0.39

0.34

0.17

0.30

0.32

0.16

0.31

0.16

0.11

Con

trol D

elay

49.7

53.3

32.4

31.2

6.4

26.0

22.6

4.7

13.2

12.0

2.8

Que

ue D

elay

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Tota

l Del

ay49

.753

.332

.431

.26.

426

.022

.64.

713

.212

.02.

8LO

SD

DC

CA

CC

AB

BA

Appr

oach

Del

ay52

.827

.020

.310

.8Ap

proa

ch L

OS

DC

CB

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yC

ycle

Len

gth:

124

.6Ac

tuat

ed C

ycle

Len

gth:

111

.7N

atur

al C

ycle

: 75

Con

trol T

ype:

Sem

i Act

-Unc

oord

Max

imum

v/c

Rat

io: 0

.80

Inte

rsec

tion

Sign

al D

elay

: 27.

3In

ters

ectio

n LO

S: C

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Util

izat

ion

73.0

%IC

U L

evel

of S

ervi

ce D

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

) 15

Split

s an

d Ph

ases

:

1: In

nisf

il Be

ach

Roa

d &

Yong

e St

reet

Page 56: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 2

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

TEB

RW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)71

454

5778

325

8611

650

311

715

032

597

Idea

l Flo

w (v

phpl

)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00La

ne W

idth

3.

03.

83.

53.

03.

83.

53.

03.

83.

53.

03.

83.

5To

tal L

ost t

ime

(s)

6.6

6.6

5.0

6.6

6.6

6.8

6.8

6.8

5.0

6.8

6.8

Lane

Util

. Fac

tor

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rote

cted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd

. Flo

w (p

rot)

1636

3527

1668

3481

1581

1532

3618

1581

1668

3583

1493

Flt P

erm

itted

0.55

1.00

0.18

1.00

1.00

0.55

1.00

1.00

0.38

1.00

1.00

Satd

. Flo

w (p

erm

)94

335

2732

234

8115

8188

336

1815

8166

635

8314

93Pe

ak-h

our f

acto

r, PH

F0.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

96Ad

j. Fl

ow (v

ph)

7447

359

8133

990

121

524

122

156

339

101

RTO

R R

educ

tion

(vph

)0

80

00

630

068

00

42La

ne G

roup

Flo

w (v

ph)

7452

40

8133

927

121

524

5415

633

959

Hea

vy V

ehic

les

(%)

3%2%

10%

1%6%

1%10

%2%

1%1%

3%7%

Turn

Typ

ePe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Perm

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPr

otec

ted

Phas

es4

38

21

6Pe

rmitt

ed P

hase

s4

88

22

66

Actu

ated

Gre

en, G

(s)

20.7

20.7

33.5

33.5

33.5

50.3

50.3

50.3

65.7

65.7

65.7

Effe

ctiv

e G

reen

, g (s

)20

.720

.733

.533

.533

.550

.350

.350

.365

.765

.765

.7Ac

tuat

ed g

/C R

atio

0.18

0.18

0.30

0.30

0.30

0.45

0.45

0.45

0.58

0.58

0.58

Cle

aran

ce T

ime

(s)

6.6

6.6

5.0

6.6

6.6

6.8

6.8

6.8

5.0

6.8

6.8

Vehi

cle

Exte

nsio

n (s

)3.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

173

648

189

1036

470

394

1616

706

481

2091

871

v/s

Rat

io P

rot

c0.1

5c0

.03

0.10

0.14

c0.0

30.

09v/

s R

atio

Per

m0.

080.

100.

020.

140.

03c0

.16

0.04

v/c

Rat

io0.

430.

810.

430.

330.

060.

310.

320.

080.

320.

160.

07U

nifo

rm D

elay

, d1

40.7

44.0

30.4

30.8

28.3

20.0

20.2

17.9

11.3

10.8

10.2

Prog

ress

ion

Fact

or1.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

00In

crem

enta

l Del

ay, d

21.

77.

31.

60.

20.

12.

00.

50.

20.

40.

20.

1D

elay

(s)

42.4

51.4

31.9

31.0

28.3

22.0

20.7

18.1

11.7

11.0

10.3

Leve

l of S

ervi

ceD

DC

CC

CC

BB

BB

Appr

oach

Del

ay (s

)50

.330

.620

.511

.0Ap

proa

ch L

OS

DC

CB

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yH

CM

Ave

rage

Con

trol D

elay

27.6

HC

M L

evel

of S

ervi

ceC

HC

M V

olum

e to

Cap

acity

ratio

0.43

Actu

ated

Cyc

le L

engt

h (s

) 11

2.6

Sum

of l

ost t

ime

(s)

16.6

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Util

izat

ion

73.0

%IC

U L

evel

of S

ervi

ceD

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

c

Crit

ical

Lan

e G

roup

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 3

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

RN

BLN

BTSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(veh

/h)

2227

2271

245

28

Sign

Con

trol

Stop

Free

Free

Gra

de0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

Hou

rly fl

ow ra

te (v

ph)

2328

2374

247

18

Pede

stria

nsLa

ne W

idth

(m)

Wal

king

Spe

ed (m

/s)

Perc

ent B

lock

age

Rig

ht tu

rn fl

are

(veh

)M

edia

n ty

peN

one

Non

eM

edia

n st

orag

e ve

h)U

pstre

am s

igna

l (m

)49

pX, p

lato

on u

nblo

cked

0.96

0.96

0.96

vC, c

onfli

ctin

g vo

lum

e89

224

047

9vC

1, s

tage

1 c

onf v

olvC

2, s

tage

2 c

onf v

olvC

u, u

nblo

cked

vol

801

121

371

tC, s

ingl

e (s

)6.

86.

94.

1tC

, 2 s

tage

(s)

tF (s

)3.

53.

32.

2p0

que

ue fr

ee %

9297

98cM

cap

acity

(veh

/h)

302

870

1136

Dire

ctio

n, L

ane

#EB

1N

B 1

NB

2N

B 3

SB 1

SB 2

Volu

me

Tota

l51

2337

137

131

416

5Vo

lum

e Le

ft23

230

00

0Vo

lum

e R

ight

280

00

08

cSH

472

1136

1700

1700

1700

1700

Volu

me

to C

apac

ity0.

110.

020.

220.

220.

180.

10Q

ueue

Len

gth

95th

(m)

2.5

0.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Con

trol D

elay

(s)

13.5

8.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Lane

LO

SB

AAp

proa

ch D

elay

(s)

13.5

0.2

0.0

Appr

oach

LO

SB

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yAv

erag

e D

elay

0.

7In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity U

tiliz

atio

n 29

.7%

ICU

Lev

el o

f Ser

vice

A

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

Page 57: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 1

Lane

Gro

upEB

LEB

TW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)33

338

8548

364

110

291

4792

467

75Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPe

rmPe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Prot

ecte

d Ph

ases

43

82

16

Perm

itted

Pha

ses

48

82

26

6D

etec

tor P

hase

44

38

82

22

16

6Sw

itch

Phas

eM

inim

um In

itial

(s)

10.0

10.0

5.0

10.0

10.0

20.0

20.0

20.0

5.0

20.0

20.0

Min

imum

Spl

it (s

)25

.625

.610

.026

.026

.026

.826

.826

.810

.027

.027

.0To

tal S

plit

(s)

25.6

25.6

22.0

47.6

47.6

55.0

55.0

55.0

22.0

77.0

77.0

Tota

l Spl

it (%

)20

.5%

20.5

%17

.7%

38.2

%38

.2%

44.1

%44

.1%

44.1

%17

.7%

61.8

%61

.8%

Yello

w T

ime

(s)

4.5

4.5

4.0

4.5

4.5

5.0

5.0

5.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

All-R

ed T

ime

(s)

2.1

2.1

1.0

2.1

2.1

1.8

1.8

1.8

1.0

1.8

1.8

Lost

Tim

e Ad

just

(s)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Tota

l Los

t Tim

e (s

)6.

66.

65.

06.

66.

66.

86.

86.

85.

06.

86.

8Le

ad/L

agLa

gLa

gLe

adLa

gLa

gLa

gLe

adLe

ad-L

ag O

ptim

ize?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Rec

all M

ode

Non

eN

one

Non

eN

one

Non

eM

axM

axM

axN

one

Max

Max

Act E

ffct G

reen

(s)

17.8

17.8

34.7

33.1

33.1

56.8

56.8

56.8

72.1

70.3

70.3

Actu

ated

g/C

Rat

io0.

150.

150.

300.

280.

280.

490.

490.

490.

620.

600.

60v/

c R

atio

0.33

0.82

0.41

0.51

0.14

0.31

0.19

0.07

0.16

0.23

0.09

Con

trol D

elay

54.6

59.4

35.9

36.8

7.9

22.8

18.3

5.5

10.6

11.5

2.7

Que

ue D

elay

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Tota

l Del

ay54

.659

.435

.936

.87.

922

.818

.35.

510

.611

.52.

7LO

SD

ED

DA

CB

AB

BA

Appr

oach

Del

ay59

.133

.718

.110

.3Ap

proa

ch L

OS

EC

BB

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yC

ycle

Len

gth:

124

.6Ac

tuat

ed C

ycle

Len

gth:

116

.8N

atur

al C

ycle

: 75

Con

trol T

ype:

Sem

i Act

-Unc

oord

Max

imum

v/c

Rat

io: 0

.82

Inte

rsec

tion

Sign

al D

elay

: 28.

8In

ters

ectio

n LO

S: C

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Util

izat

ion

77.4

%IC

U L

evel

of S

ervi

ce D

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

) 15

Split

s an

d Ph

ases

:

1: In

nisf

il Be

ach

Roa

d &

Yong

e St

reet

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 2

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

TEB

RW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)33

338

7385

483

6411

029

147

9246

775

Idea

l Flo

w (v

phpl

)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00La

ne W

idth

3.

03.

83.

83.

03.

83.

53.

03.

83.

53.

03.

83.

5To

tal L

ost t

ime

(s)

6.6

6.6

5.0

6.6

6.6

6.8

6.8

6.8

5.0

6.8

6.8

Lane

Util

. Fac

tor

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.97

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rote

cted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd

. Flo

w (p

rot)

1404

3392

1604

3548

1536

1532

3325

1479

1620

3618

1389

Flt P

erm

itted

0.47

1.00

0.22

1.00

1.00

0.47

1.00

1.00

0.52

1.00

1.00

Satd

. Flo

w (p

erm

)68

733

9237

235

4815

3676

133

2514

7988

636

1813

89Pe

ak-h

our f

acto

r, PH

F0.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

95Ad

j. Fl

ow (v

ph)

3535

677

8950

867

116

306

4997

492

79R

TOR

Red

uctio

n (v

ph)

014

00

048

00

250

031

Lane

Gro

up F

low

(vph

)35

419

089

508

1911

630

624

9749

248

Hea

vy V

ehic

les

(%)

20%

5%10

%5%

4%4%

10%

11%

8%4%

2%15

%Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPe

rmPe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Prot

ecte

d Ph

ases

43

82

16

Perm

itted

Pha

ses

48

82

26

6Ac

tuat

ed G

reen

, G (s

)17

.817

.833

.133

.133

.156

.856

.856

.870

.370

.370

.3Ef

fect

ive

Gre

en, g

(s)

17.8

17.8

33.1

33.1

33.1

56.8

56.8

56.8

70.3

70.3

70.3

Actu

ated

g/C

Rat

io0.

150.

150.

280.

280.

280.

490.

490.

490.

600.

600.

60C

lear

ance

Tim

e (s

)6.

66.

65.

06.

66.

66.

86.

86.

85.

06.

86.

8Ve

hicl

e Ex

tens

ion

(s)

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)10

551

721

410

0543

537

016

1771

958

721

7883

6v/

s R

atio

Pro

tc0

.12

0.04

c0.1

40.

090.

01c0

.14

v/s

Rat

io P

erm

0.05

0.08

0.01

c0.1

50.

020.

090.

03v/

c R

atio

0.33

0.81

0.42

0.51

0.04

0.31

0.19

0.03

0.17

0.23

0.06

Uni

form

Del

ay, d

144

.247

.932

.535

.030

.418

.217

.015

.710

.010

.79.

6Pr

ogre

ssio

n Fa

ctor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incr

emen

tal D

elay

, d2

1.9

9.1

1.3

0.4

0.0

2.2

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

Del

ay (s

)46

.157

.033

.835

.430

.420

.417

.215

.710

.111

.09.

7Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DE

CD

CC

BB

BB

AAp

proa

ch D

elay

(s)

56.2

34.7

17.9

10.7

Appr

oach

LO

SE

CB

B

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yH

CM

Ave

rage

Con

trol D

elay

28.6

HC

M L

evel

of S

ervi

ceC

HC

M V

olum

e to

Cap

acity

ratio

0.46

Actu

ated

Cyc

le L

engt

h (s

) 11

6.8

Sum

of l

ost t

ime

(s)

26.8

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Util

izat

ion

77.4

%IC

U L

evel

of S

ervi

ceD

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

c

Crit

ical

Lan

e G

roup

Page 58: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 3

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

TEB

RW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(veh

/h)

200

268

010

2341

79

660

99

Sign

Con

trol

Stop

Stop

Free

Free

Gra

de0%

0%0%

0%Pe

ak H

our F

acto

r0.

950.

950.

950.

920.

950.

920.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

95H

ourly

flow

rate

(vph

)21

027

90

1124

439

96

641

9Pe

dest

rians

Lane

Wid

th (m

)W

alki

ng S

peed

(m/s

)Pe

rcen

t Blo

ckag

eR

ight

turn

flar

e (v

eh)

Med

ian

type

Non

eN

one

Med

ian

stor

age

veh)

Ups

tream

sig

nal (

m)

49pX

, pla

toon

unb

lock

ed0.

940.

940.

940.

940.

940.

94vC

, con

flict

ing

volu

me

937

1155

325

848

1151

219

651

448

vC1,

sta

ge 1

con

f vol

vC2,

sta

ge 2

con

f vol

vCu,

unb

lock

ed v

ol80

210

3415

070

710

2921

949

644

8tC

, sin

gle

(s)

7.5

6.5

6.9

7.5

6.5

6.9

4.1

4.1

tC, 2

sta

ge (s

)tF

(s)

3.5

4.0

3.3

3.5

4.0

3.3

2.2

2.2

p0 q

ueue

free

%92

100

9797

100

9998

99cM

cap

acity

(veh

/h)

249

210

816

286

211

785

998

1108

Dire

ctio

n, L

ane

#EB

1W

B 1

NB

1N

B 2

NB

3N

B 4

SB 1

SB 2

Volu

me

Tota

l48

2024

219

219

932

733

0Vo

lum

e Le

ft21

924

00

06

0Vo

lum

e R

ight

2711

00

09

09

cSH

410

442

998

1700

1700

1700

1108

1700

Volu

me

to C

apac

ity0.

120.

040.

020.

130.

130.

010.

010.

19Q

ueue

Len

gth

95th

(m)

2.8

1.0

0.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

Con

trol D

elay

(s)

15.0

13.5

8.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.0

Lane

LO

SB

BA

AAp

proa

ch D

elay

(s)

15.0

13.5

0.4

0.1

Appr

oach

LO

SB

B

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yAv

erag

e D

elay

1.

1In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity U

tiliz

atio

n 34

.0%

ICU

Lev

el o

f Ser

vice

A

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 4

Mov

emen

tEB

TEB

RW

BLW

BTN

BLN

BRLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(veh

/h)

465

1214

621

1111

Sign

Con

trol

Free

Free

Stop

Gra

de0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

Hou

rly fl

ow ra

te (v

ph)

489

1315

654

1212

Pede

stria

nsLa

ne W

idth

(m)

Wal

king

Spe

ed (m

/s)

Perc

ent B

lock

age

Rig

ht tu

rn fl

are

(veh

)M

edia

n ty

peN

one

Non

eM

edia

n st

orag

e ve

h)U

pstre

am s

igna

l (m

)56

pX, p

lato

on u

nblo

cked

0.89

0.89

0.89

vC, c

onfli

ctin

g vo

lum

e50

285

225

1vC

1, s

tage

1 c

onf v

olvC

2, s

tage

2 c

onf v

olvC

u, u

nblo

cked

vol

186

580

0tC

, sin

gle

(s)

4.1

6.8

6.9

tC, 2

sta

ge (s

)tF

(s)

2.2

3.5

3.3

p0 q

ueue

free

%99

9799

cM c

apac

ity (v

eh/h

)12

3039

096

3

Dire

ctio

n, L

ane

#EB

1EB

2W

B 1

WB

2W

B 3

NB

1Vo

lum

e To

tal

326

176

1532

732

723

Volu

me

Left

00

150

012

Volu

me

Rig

ht0

130

00

12cS

H17

0017

0012

3017

0017

0055

5Vo

lum

e to

Cap

acity

0.19

0.10

0.01

0.19

0.19

0.04

Que

ue L

engt

h 95

th (m

)0.

00.

00.

30.

00.

00.

9C

ontro

l Del

ay (s

)0.

00.

08.

00.

00.

011

.8La

ne L

OS

AB

Appr

oach

Del

ay (s

)0.

00.

211

.8Ap

proa

ch L

OS

B

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yAv

erag

e D

elay

0.

3In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity U

tiliz

atio

n 27

.2%

ICU

Lev

el o

f Ser

vice

A

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

Page 59: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 1

Lane

Gro

upEB

LEB

TW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)71

460

7832

888

120

507

117

153

328

97Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPe

rmPe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Prot

ecte

d Ph

ases

43

82

16

Perm

itted

Pha

ses

48

82

26

6D

etec

tor P

hase

44

38

82

22

16

6Sw

itch

Phas

eM

inim

um In

itial

(s)

10.0

10.0

5.0

10.0

10.0

20.0

20.0

20.0

5.0

20.0

20.0

Min

imum

Spl

it (s

)25

.625

.610

.026

.026

.026

.826

.826

.810

.027

.027

.0To

tal S

plit

(s)

30.6

30.6

22.0

52.6

52.6

50.0

50.0

50.0

22.0

72.0

72.0

Tota

l Spl

it (%

)24

.6%

24.6

%17

.7%

42.2

%42

.2%

40.1

%40

.1%

40.1

%17

.7%

57.8

%57

.8%

Yello

w T

ime

(s)

4.5

4.5

4.0

4.5

4.5

5.0

5.0

5.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

All-R

ed T

ime

(s)

2.1

2.1

1.0

2.1

2.1

1.8

1.8

1.8

1.0

1.8

1.8

Lost

Tim

e Ad

just

(s)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Tota

l Los

t Tim

e (s

)6.

66.

65.

06.

66.

66.

86.

86.

85.

06.

86.

8Le

ad/L

agLa

gLa

gLe

adLa

gLa

gLa

gLe

adLe

ad-L

ag O

ptim

ize?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Rec

all M

ode

Non

eN

one

Non

eN

one

Non

eM

axM

axM

axN

one

Max

Max

Act E

ffct G

reen

(s)

21.0

21.0

34.3

32.6

32.6

50.1

50.1

50.1

67.6

65.7

65.7

Actu

ated

g/C

Rat

io0.

190.

190.

310.

290.

290.

450.

450.

450.

600.

590.

59v/

c R

atio

0.42

0.81

0.39

0.34

0.17

0.32

0.33

0.16

0.32

0.16

0.11

Con

trol D

elay

49.6

53.4

32.3

31.2

6.4

26.4

22.8

4.7

13.3

12.1

2.8

Que

ue D

elay

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Tota

l Del

ay49

.653

.432

.331

.26.

426

.422

.84.

713

.312

.12.

8LO

SD

DC

CA

CC

AB

BA

Appr

oach

Del

ay53

.026

.920

.510

.9Ap

proa

ch L

OS

DC

CB

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yC

ycle

Len

gth:

124

.6Ac

tuat

ed C

ycle

Len

gth:

111

.9N

atur

al C

ycle

: 75

Con

trol T

ype:

Sem

i Act

-Unc

oord

Max

imum

v/c

Rat

io: 0

.81

Inte

rsec

tion

Sign

al D

elay

: 27.

5In

ters

ectio

n LO

S: C

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Util

izat

ion

73.2

%IC

U L

evel

of S

ervi

ce D

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

) 15

Split

s an

d Ph

ases

:

1: In

nisf

il Be

ach

Roa

d &

Yong

e St

reet

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 2

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

TEB

RW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)71

460

5878

328

8812

050

711

715

332

897

Idea

l Flo

w (v

phpl

)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00La

ne W

idth

3.

03.

83.

53.

03.

83.

53.

03.

83.

53.

03.

83.

5To

tal L

ost t

ime

(s)

6.6

6.6

5.0

6.6

6.6

6.8

6.8

6.8

5.0

6.8

6.8

Lane

Util

. Fac

tor

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.98

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rote

cted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd

. Flo

w (p

rot)

1636

3527

1668

3481

1581

1532

3618

1581

1668

3583

1493

Flt P

erm

itted

0.55

1.00

0.18

1.00

1.00

0.55

1.00

1.00

0.38

1.00

1.00

Satd

. Flo

w (p

erm

)94

035

2731

734

8115

8188

136

1815

8166

035

8314

93Pe

ak-h

our f

acto

r, PH

F0.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

96Ad

j. Fl

ow (v

ph)

7447

960

8134

292

125

528

122

159

342

101

RTO

R R

educ

tion

(vph

)0

80

00

640

068

00

42La

ne G

roup

Flo

w (v

ph)

7453

10

8134

228

125

528

5415

934

259

Hea

vy V

ehic

les

(%)

3%2%

10%

1%6%

1%10

%2%

1%1%

3%7%

Turn

Typ

ePe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Perm

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPr

otec

ted

Phas

es4

38

21

6Pe

rmitt

ed P

hase

s4

88

22

66

Actu

ated

Gre

en, G

(s)

21.0

21.0

33.8

33.8

33.8

50.1

50.1

50.1

65.7

65.7

65.7

Effe

ctiv

e G

reen

, g (s

)21

.021

.033

.833

.833

.850

.150

.150

.165

.765

.765

.7Ac

tuat

ed g

/C R

atio

0.19

0.19

0.30

0.30

0.30

0.44

0.44

0.44

0.58

0.58

0.58

Cle

aran

ce T

ime

(s)

6.6

6.6

5.0

6.6

6.6

6.8

6.8

6.8

5.0

6.8

6.8

Vehi

cle

Exte

nsio

n (s

)3.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

175

656

188

1042

473

391

1606

702

479

2085

869

v/s

Rat

io P

rot

c0.1

5c0

.03

0.10

0.15

c0.0

30.

10v/

s R

atio

Per

m0.

080.

100.

020.

140.

03c0

.16

0.04

v/c

Rat

io0.

420.

810.

430.

330.

060.

320.

330.

080.

330.

160.

07U

nifo

rm D

elay

, d1

40.6

44.0

30.3

30.7

28.2

20.4

20.4

18.1

11.4

10.9

10.3

Prog

ress

ion

Fact

or1.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

00In

crem

enta

l Del

ay, d

21.

67.

31.

60.

20.

12.

10.

50.

20.

40.

20.

2D

elay

(s)

42.2

51.3

31.9

30.9

28.3

22.5

21.0

18.3

11.8

11.1

10.4

Leve

l of S

ervi

ceD

DC

CC

CC

BB

BB

Appr

oach

Del

ay (s

)50

.230

.620

.811

.2Ap

proa

ch L

OS

DC

CB

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yH

CM

Ave

rage

Con

trol D

elay

27.7

HC

M L

evel

of S

ervi

ceC

HC

M V

olum

e to

Cap

acity

ratio

0.43

Actu

ated

Cyc

le L

engt

h (s

) 11

2.9

Sum

of l

ost t

ime

(s)

16.6

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Util

izat

ion

73.2

%IC

U L

evel

of S

ervi

ceD

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

c

Crit

ical

Lan

e G

roup

Page 60: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 3

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

TEB

RW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(veh

/h)

220

2710

016

2270

417

844

88

Sign

Con

trol

Stop

Stop

Free

Free

Gra

de0%

0%0%

0%Pe

ak H

our F

acto

r0.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

96H

ourly

flow

rate

(vph

)23

028

100

1723

733

188

467

8Pe

dest

rians

Lane

Wid

th (m

)W

alki

ng S

peed

(m/s

)Pe

rcen

t Blo

ckag

eR

ight

turn

flar

e (v

eh)

Med

ian

type

Non

eN

one

Med

ian

stor

age

veh)

Ups

tream

sig

nal (

m)

49pX

, pla

toon

unb

lock

ed0.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

96vC

, con

flict

ing

volu

me

917

1284

238

1057

1271

367

475

751

vC1,

sta

ge 1

con

f vol

vC2,

sta

ge 2

con

f vol

vCu,

unb

lock

ed v

ol82

612

0911

797

211

9536

736

575

1tC

, sin

gle

(s)

7.5

6.5

6.9

7.5

6.5

6.9

4.1

4.1

tC, 2

sta

ge (s

)tF

(s)

3.5

4.0

3.3

3.5

4.0

3.3

2.2

2.2

p0 q

ueue

free

%90

100

9794

100

9798

99cM

cap

acity

(veh

/h)

241

169

875

187

172

630

1141

854

Dire

ctio

n, L

ane

#EB

1W

B 1

NB

1N

B 2

NB

3N

B 4

SB 1

SB 2

Volu

me

Tota

l51

2723

367

367

1824

224

2Vo

lum

e Le

ft23

1023

00

08

0Vo

lum

e R

ight

2817

00

018

08

cSH

401

330

1141

1700

1700

1700

854

1700

Volu

me

to C

apac

ity0.

130.

080.

020.

220.

220.

010.

010.

14Q

ueue

Len

gth

95th

(m)

3.0

1.9

0.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.0

Con

trol D

elay

(s)

15.3

16.9

8.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.4

0.0

Lane

LO

SC

CA

AAp

proa

ch D

elay

(s)

15.3

16.9

0.2

0.2

Appr

oach

LO

SC

C

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yAv

erag

e D

elay

1.

1In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity U

tiliz

atio

n 30

.1%

ICU

Lev

el o

f Ser

vice

A

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 4

Mov

emen

tEB

TEB

RW

BLW

BTN

BLN

BRLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(veh

/h)

711

1910

484

1018

Sign

Con

trol

Free

Free

Stop

Gra

de0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

Hou

rly fl

ow ra

te (v

ph)

741

2010

504

1019

Pede

stria

nsLa

ne W

idth

(m)

Wal

king

Spe

ed (m

/s)

Perc

ent B

lock

age

Rig

ht tu

rn fl

are

(veh

)M

edia

n ty

peN

one

Non

eM

edia

n st

orag

e ve

h)U

pstre

am s

igna

l (m

)57

pX, p

lato

on u

nblo

cked

0.86

0.86

0.86

vC, c

onfli

ctin

g vo

lum

e76

010

2338

0vC

1, s

tage

1 c

onf v

olvC

2, s

tage

2 c

onf v

olvC

u, u

nblo

cked

vol

394

700

0tC

, sin

gle

(s)

4.1

6.8

6.9

tC, 2

sta

ge (s

)tF

(s)

2.2

3.5

3.3

p0 q

ueue

free

%99

9798

cM c

apac

ity (v

eh/h

)99

831

793

2

Dire

ctio

n, L

ane

#EB

1EB

2W

B 1

WB

2W

B 3

NB

1Vo

lum

e To

tal

494

267

1025

225

229

Volu

me

Left

00

100

010

Volu

me

Rig

ht0

200

00

19cS

H17

0017

0099

817

0017

0055

1Vo

lum

e to

Cap

acity

0.29

0.16

0.01

0.15

0.15

0.05

Que

ue L

engt

h 95

th (m

)0.

00.

00.

20.

00.

01.

2C

ontro

l Del

ay (s

)0.

00.

08.

60.

00.

011

.9La

ne L

OS

AB

Appr

oach

Del

ay (s

)0.

00.

211

.9Ap

proa

ch L

OS

B

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yAv

erag

e D

elay

0.

3In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity U

tiliz

atio

n 30

.3%

ICU

Lev

el o

f Ser

vice

A

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

Page 61: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2029 Future Background and Total Conditions

Page 62: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 1

Lane

Gro

upEB

LEB

TW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)37

369

9453

069

119

317

5299

513

83Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPe

rmPe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Prot

ecte

d Ph

ases

43

82

16

Perm

itted

Pha

ses

48

82

26

6D

etec

tor P

hase

44

38

82

22

16

6Sw

itch

Phas

eM

inim

um In

itial

(s)

10.0

10.0

5.0

10.0

10.0

20.0

20.0

20.0

5.0

20.0

20.0

Min

imum

Spl

it (s

)25

.625

.610

.026

.026

.026

.826

.826

.810

.027

.027

.0To

tal S

plit

(s)

25.6

25.6

22.0

47.6

47.6

55.0

55.0

55.0

22.0

77.0

77.0

Tota

l Spl

it (%

)20

.5%

20.5

%17

.7%

38.2

%38

.2%

44.1

%44

.1%

44.1

%17

.7%

61.8

%61

.8%

Yello

w T

ime

(s)

4.5

4.5

4.0

4.5

4.5

5.0

5.0

5.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

All-R

ed T

ime

(s)

2.1

2.1

1.0

2.1

2.1

1.8

1.8

1.8

1.0

1.8

1.8

Lost

Tim

e Ad

just

(s)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Tota

l Los

t Tim

e (s

)6.

66.

65.

06.

66.

66.

86.

86.

85.

06.

86.

8Le

ad/L

agLa

gLa

gLe

adLa

gLa

gLa

gLe

adLe

ad-L

ag O

ptim

ize?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Rec

all M

ode

Non

eN

one

Non

eN

one

Non

eM

axM

axM

axN

one

Max

Max

Act E

ffct G

reen

(s)

18.5

18.5

35.9

34.3

34.3

56.6

56.6

56.6

72.1

70.3

70.3

Actu

ated

g/C

Rat

io0.

160.

160.

300.

290.

290.

480.

480.

480.

610.

600.

60v/

c R

atio

0.38

0.86

0.46

0.54

0.15

0.36

0.21

0.07

0.18

0.25

0.10

Con

trol D

elay

57.4

63.7

37.4

37.3

7.5

24.7

19.1

5.4

11.0

12.1

2.7

Que

ue D

elay

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Tota

l Del

ay57

.463

.737

.437

.37.

524

.719

.15.

411

.012

.12.

7LO

SE

ED

DA

CB

AB

BA

Appr

oach

Del

ay63

.234

.319

.010

.8Ap

proa

ch L

OS

EC

BB

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yC

ycle

Len

gth:

124

.6Ac

tuat

ed C

ycle

Len

gth:

118

Nat

ural

Cyc

le: 7

5C

ontro

l Typ

e: S

emi A

ct-U

ncoo

rdM

axim

um v

/c R

atio

: 0.8

6In

ters

ectio

n Si

gnal

Del

ay: 3

0.2

Inte

rsec

tion

LOS:

CIn

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity U

tiliz

atio

n 78

.7%

ICU

Lev

el o

f Ser

vice

DAn

alys

is P

erio

d (m

in) 1

5

Split

s an

d Ph

ases

:

1: In

nisf

il Be

ach

Roa

d &

Yong

e St

reet

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 2

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

TEB

RW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)37

369

7994

530

6911

931

752

9951

383

Idea

l Flo

w (v

phpl

)19

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

0019

00La

ne W

idth

3.

03.

83.

83.

03.

83.

53.

03.

83.

53.

03.

83.

5To

tal L

ost t

ime

(s)

6.6

6.6

5.0

6.6

6.6

6.8

6.8

6.8

5.0

6.8

6.8

Lane

Util

. Fac

tor

1.00

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

Frt

1.00

0.97

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

1.00

0.85

1.00

1.00

0.85

Flt P

rote

cted

0.95

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

0.95

1.00

1.00

Satd

. Flo

w (p

rot)

1404

3393

1604

3548

1536

1532

3325

1479

1620

3618

1389

Flt P

erm

itted

0.44

1.00

0.19

1.00

1.00

0.45

1.00

1.00

0.51

1.00

1.00

Satd

. Flo

w (p

erm

)65

533

9331

935

4815

3672

733

2514

7986

236

1813

89Pe

ak-h

our f

acto

r, PH

F0.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

95Ad

j. Fl

ow (v

ph)

3938

883

9955

873

125

334

5510

454

087

RTO

R R

educ

tion

(vph

)0

140

00

520

029

00

35La

ne G

roup

Flo

w (v

ph)

3945

70

9955

821

125

334

2610

454

052

Hea

vy V

ehic

les

(%)

20%

5%10

%5%

4%4%

10%

11%

8%4%

2%15

%Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPe

rmPe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Prot

ecte

d Ph

ases

43

82

16

Perm

itted

Pha

ses

48

82

26

6Ac

tuat

ed G

reen

, G (s

)18

.518

.534

.334

.334

.356

.656

.656

.670

.370

.370

.3Ef

fect

ive

Gre

en, g

(s)

18.5

18.5

34.3

34.3

34.3

56.6

56.6

56.6

70.3

70.3

70.3

Actu

ated

g/C

Rat

io0.

160.

160.

290.

290.

290.

480.

480.

480.

600.

600.

60C

lear

ance

Tim

e (s

)6.

66.

65.

06.

66.

66.

86.

86.

85.

06.

86.

8Ve

hicl

e Ex

tens

ion

(s)

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)10

353

221

010

3144

634

915

9570

956

921

5582

8v/

s R

atio

Pro

tc0

.13

0.04

c0.1

60.

100.

01c0

.15

v/s

Rat

io P

erm

0.06

0.09

0.01

c0.1

70.

020.

100.

04v/

c R

atio

0.38

0.86

0.47

0.54

0.05

0.36

0.21

0.04

0.18

0.25

0.06

Uni

form

Del

ay, d

144

.648

.532

.635

.230

.119

.317

.816

.310

.411

.310

.0Pr

ogre

ssio

n Fa

ctor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incr

emen

tal D

elay

, d2

2.3

13.0

1.7

0.6

0.0

2.8

0.3

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.1

Del

ay (s

)46

.961

.434

.335

.830

.122

.118

.116

.410

.611

.610

.2Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DE

CD

CC

BB

BB

BAp

proa

ch D

elay

(s)

60.3

35.0

18.9

11.3

Appr

oach

LO

SE

DB

B

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yH

CM

Ave

rage

Con

trol D

elay

29.9

HC

M L

evel

of S

ervi

ceC

HC

M V

olum

e to

Cap

acity

ratio

0.51

Actu

ated

Cyc

le L

engt

h (s

) 11

8.0

Sum

of l

ost t

ime

(s)

26.8

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Util

izat

ion

78.7

%IC

U L

evel

of S

ervi

ceD

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

c

Crit

ical

Lan

e G

roup

Page 63: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 3

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

RN

BLN

BTSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(veh

/h)

2026

2346

467

59

Sign

Con

trol

Stop

Free

Free

Gra

de0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

Hou

rly fl

ow ra

te (v

ph)

2127

2448

871

19

Pede

stria

nsLa

ne W

idth

(m)

Wal

king

Spe

ed (m

/s)

Perc

ent B

lock

age

Rig

ht tu

rn fl

are

(veh

)M

edia

n ty

peN

one

Non

eM

edia

n st

orag

e ve

h)U

pstre

am s

igna

l (m

)49

pX, p

lato

on u

nblo

cked

0.93

0.93

0.93

vC, c

onfli

ctin

g vo

lum

e10

0836

072

0vC

1, s

tage

1 c

onf v

olvC

2, s

tage

2 c

onf v

olvC

u, u

nblo

cked

vol

858

161

548

tC, s

ingl

e (s

)6.

86.

94.

1tC

, 2 s

tage

(s)

tF (s

)3.

53.

32.

2p0

que

ue fr

ee %

9297

97cM

cap

acity

(veh

/h)

268

796

946

Dire

ctio

n, L

ane

#EB

1N

B 1

NB

2N

B 3

SB 1

SB 2

Volu

me

Tota

l48

2424

424

447

424

6Vo

lum

e Le

ft21

240

00

0Vo

lum

e R

ight

270

00

09

cSH

429

946

1700

1700

1700

1700

Volu

me

to C

apac

ity0.

110.

030.

140.

140.

280.

14Q

ueue

Len

gth

95th

(m)

2.7

0.6

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Con

trol D

elay

(s)

14.5

8.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Lane

LO

SB

AAp

proa

ch D

elay

(s)

14.5

0.4

0.0

Appr

oach

LO

SB

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yAv

erag

e D

elay

0.

7In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity U

tiliz

atio

n 29

.1%

ICU

Lev

el o

f Ser

vice

A

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 1

Lane

Gro

upEB

LEB

TW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)78

501

8735

895

128

556

129

166

358

107

Turn

Typ

ePe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Perm

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPr

otec

ted

Phas

es4

38

21

6Pe

rmitt

ed P

hase

s4

88

22

66

Det

ecto

r Pha

se4

43

88

22

21

66

Switc

h Ph

ase

Min

imum

Initi

al (s

)10

.010

.05.

010

.010

.020

.020

.020

.05.

020

.020

.0M

inim

um S

plit

(s)

25.6

25.6

10.0

26.0

26.0

26.8

26.8

26.8

10.0

27.0

27.0

Tota

l Spl

it (s

)30

.630

.622

.052

.652

.650

.050

.050

.022

.072

.072

.0To

tal S

plit

(%)

24.6

%24

.6%

17.7

%42

.2%

42.2

%40

.1%

40.1

%40

.1%

17.7

%57

.8%

57.8

%Ye

llow

Tim

e (s

)4.

54.

54.

04.

54.

55.

05.

05.

04.

05.

05.

0Al

l-Red

Tim

e (s

)2.

12.

11.

02.

12.

11.

81.

81.

81.

01.

81.

8Lo

st T

ime

Adju

st (s

)0.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

0To

tal L

ost T

ime

(s)

6.6

6.6

5.0

6.6

6.6

6.8

6.8

6.8

5.0

6.8

6.8

Lead

/Lag

Lag

Lag

Lead

Lag

Lag

Lag

Lead

Lead

-Lag

Opt

imiz

e?Ye

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sR

ecal

l Mod

eN

one

Non

eN

one

Non

eN

one

Max

Max

Max

Non

eM

axM

axAc

t Effc

t Gre

en (s

)22

.522

.539

.037

.437

.448

.948

.948

.967

.165

.365

.3Ac

tuat

ed g

/C R

atio

0.19

0.19

0.34

0.32

0.32

0.42

0.42

0.42

0.58

0.56

0.56

v/c

Rat

io0.

460.

850.

440.

330.

170.

370.

380.

180.

390.

190.

12C

ontro

l Del

ay51

.457

.433

.430

.66.

029

.025

.24.

714

.913

.22.

8Q

ueue

Del

ay0.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

0To

tal D

elay

51.4

57.4

33.4

30.6

6.0

29.0

25.2

4.7

14.9

13.2

2.8

LOS

DE

CC

AC

CA

BB

AAp

proa

ch D

elay

56.7

26.7

22.6

11.9

Appr

oach

LO

SE

CC

B

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yC

ycle

Len

gth:

124

.6Ac

tuat

ed C

ycle

Len

gth:

116

.1N

atur

al C

ycle

: 75

Con

trol T

ype:

Sem

i Act

-Unc

oord

Max

imum

v/c

Rat

io: 0

.85

Inte

rsec

tion

Sign

al D

elay

: 29.

2In

ters

ectio

n LO

S: C

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Util

izat

ion

75.0

%IC

U L

evel

of S

ervi

ce D

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

) 15

Split

s an

d Ph

ases

:

1: In

nisf

il Be

ach

Roa

d &

Yong

e St

reet

Page 64: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 2

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

TEB

RW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)78

501

6387

358

9512

855

612

916

635

810

7Id

eal F

low

(vph

pl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Lane

Wid

th

3.0

3.8

3.5

3.0

3.8

3.5

3.0

3.8

3.5

3.0

3.8

3.5

Tota

l Los

t tim

e (s

)6.

66.

65.

06.

66.

66.

86.

86.

85.

06.

86.

8La

ne U

til. F

acto

r1.

000.

951.

000.

951.

001.

000.

951.

001.

000.

951.

00Fr

t1.

000.

981.

001.

000.

851.

001.

000.

851.

001.

000.

85Fl

t Pro

tect

ed0.

951.

000.

951.

001.

000.

951.

001.

000.

951.

001.

00Sa

td. F

low

(pro

t)16

3635

2616

6834

8115

8115

3236

1815

8116

6835

8314

93Fl

t Per

mitt

ed0.

531.

000.

151.

001.

000.

531.

001.

000.

341.

001.

00Sa

td. F

low

(per

m)

913

3526

265

3481

1581

855

3618

1581

594

3583

1493

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor,

PHF

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

Adj.

Flow

(vph

)81

522

6691

373

9913

357

913

417

337

311

1R

TOR

Red

uctio

n (v

ph)

08

00

067

00

780

049

Lane

Gro

up F

low

(vph

)81

580

091

373

3213

357

956

173

373

62H

eavy

Veh

icle

s (%

)3%

2%10

%1%

6%1%

10%

2%1%

1%3%

7%Tu

rn T

ype

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPe

rmPe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Prot

ecte

d Ph

ases

43

82

16

Perm

itted

Pha

ses

48

82

26

6Ac

tuat

ed G

reen

, G (s

)22

.522

.537

.437

.437

.448

.948

.948

.965

.365

.365

.3Ef

fect

ive

Gre

en, g

(s)

22.5

22.5

37.4

37.4

37.4

48.9

48.9

48.9

65.3

65.3

65.3

Actu

ated

g/C

Rat

io0.

190.

190.

320.

320.

320.

420.

420.

420.

560.

560.

56C

lear

ance

Tim

e (s

)6.

66.

65.

06.

66.

66.

86.

86.

85.

06.

86.

8Ve

hicl

e Ex

tens

ion

(s)

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

Lane

Grp

Cap

(vph

)17

768

320

511

2150

936

015

2466

644

020

1584

0v/

s R

atio

Pro

tc0

.16

c0.0

40.

110.

16c0

.04

0.10

v/s

Rat

io P

erm

0.09

0.10

0.02

0.16

0.04

c0.1

80.

04v/

c R

atio

0.46

0.85

0.44

0.33

0.06

0.37

0.38

0.08

0.39

0.19

0.07

Uni

form

Del

ay, d

141

.445

.229

.829

.927

.223

.023

.220

.213

.212

.411

.6Pr

ogre

ssio

n Fa

ctor

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Incr

emen

tal D

elay

, d2

1.9

9.7

1.5

0.2

0.1

2.9

0.7

0.3

0.6

0.2

0.2

Del

ay (s

)43

.354

.831

.330

.127

.325

.923

.920

.413

.812

.611

.8Le

vel o

f Ser

vice

DD

CC

CC

CC

BB

BAp

proa

ch D

elay

(s)

53.4

29.8

23.7

12.8

Appr

oach

LO

SD

CC

B

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yH

CM

Ave

rage

Con

trol D

elay

29.6

HC

M L

evel

of S

ervi

ceC

HC

M V

olum

e to

Cap

acity

ratio

0.49

Actu

ated

Cyc

le L

engt

h (s

) 11

6.1

Sum

of l

ost t

ime

(s)

16.6

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Util

izat

ion

75.0

%IC

U L

evel

of S

ervi

ceD

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

c

Crit

ical

Lan

e G

roup

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 3

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

RN

BLN

BTSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(veh

/h)

2227

2278

649

98

Sign

Con

trol

Stop

Free

Free

Gra

de0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

Hou

rly fl

ow ra

te (v

ph)

2328

2381

952

08

Pede

stria

nsLa

ne W

idth

(m)

Wal

king

Spe

ed (m

/s)

Perc

ent B

lock

age

Rig

ht tu

rn fl

are

(veh

)M

edia

n ty

peN

one

Non

eM

edia

n st

orag

e ve

h)U

pstre

am s

igna

l (m

)49

pX, p

lato

on u

nblo

cked

0.95

0.95

0.95

vC, c

onfli

ctin

g vo

lum

e97

926

452

8vC

1, s

tage

1 c

onf v

olvC

2, s

tage

2 c

onf v

olvC

u, u

nblo

cked

vol

875

124

401

tC, s

ingl

e (s

)6.

86.

94.

1tC

, 2 s

tage

(s)

tF (s

)3.

53.

32.

2p0

que

ue fr

ee %

9197

98cM

cap

acity

(veh

/h)

269

860

1098

Dire

ctio

n, L

ane

#EB

1N

B 1

NB

2N

B 3

SB 1

SB 2

Volu

me

Tota

l51

2340

940

934

718

2Vo

lum

e Le

ft23

230

00

0Vo

lum

e R

ight

280

00

08

cSH

433

1098

1700

1700

1700

1700

Volu

me

to C

apac

ity0.

120.

020.

240.

240.

200.

11Q

ueue

Len

gth

95th

(m)

2.8

0.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Con

trol D

elay

(s)

14.4

8.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Lane

LO

SB

AAp

proa

ch D

elay

(s)

14.4

0.2

0.0

Appr

oach

LO

SB

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yAv

erag

e D

elay

0.

7In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity U

tiliz

atio

n 31

.7%

ICU

Lev

el o

f Ser

vice

A

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

Page 65: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 1

Lane

Gro

upEB

LEB

TW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)37

372

9453

370

121

321

5210

251

583

Turn

Typ

ePe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Perm

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPr

otec

ted

Phas

es4

38

21

6Pe

rmitt

ed P

hase

s4

88

22

66

Det

ecto

r Pha

se4

43

88

22

21

66

Switc

h Ph

ase

Min

imum

Initi

al (s

)10

.010

.05.

010

.010

.020

.020

.020

.05.

020

.020

.0M

inim

um S

plit

(s)

25.6

25.6

10.0

26.0

26.0

26.8

26.8

26.8

10.0

27.0

27.0

Tota

l Spl

it (s

)25

.625

.622

.047

.647

.655

.055

.055

.022

.077

.077

.0To

tal S

plit

(%)

20.5

%20

.5%

17.7

%38

.2%

38.2

%44

.1%

44.1

%44

.1%

17.7

%61

.8%

61.8

%Ye

llow

Tim

e (s

)4.

54.

54.

04.

54.

55.

05.

05.

04.

05.

05.

0Al

l-Red

Tim

e (s

)2.

12.

11.

02.

12.

11.

81.

81.

81.

01.

81.

8Lo

st T

ime

Adju

st (s

)0.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

0To

tal L

ost T

ime

(s)

6.6

6.6

5.0

6.6

6.6

6.8

6.8

6.8

5.0

6.8

6.8

Lead

/Lag

Lag

Lag

Lead

Lag

Lag

Lag

Lead

Lead

-Lag

Opt

imiz

e?Ye

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sR

ecal

l Mod

eN

one

Non

eN

one

Non

eN

one

Max

Max

Max

Non

eM

axM

axAc

t Effc

t Gre

en (s

)18

.518

.536

.034

.434

.456

.456

.456

.472

.070

.270

.2Ac

tuat

ed g

/C R

atio

0.16

0.16

0.31

0.29

0.29

0.48

0.48

0.48

0.61

0.59

0.59

v/c

Rat

io0.

380.

870.

460.

540.

150.

370.

210.

070.

180.

250.

10C

ontro

l Del

ay57

.564

.437

.537

.37.

525

.019

.25.

411

.012

.12.

7Q

ueue

Del

ay0.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

0To

tal D

elay

57.5

64.4

37.5

37.3

7.5

25.0

19.2

5.4

11.0

12.1

2.7

LOS

EE

DD

AC

BA

BB

AAp

proa

ch D

elay

63.9

34.3

19.2

10.8

Appr

oach

LO

SE

CB

B

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yC

ycle

Len

gth:

124

.6Ac

tuat

ed C

ycle

Len

gth:

118

Nat

ural

Cyc

le: 7

5C

ontro

l Typ

e: S

emi A

ct-U

ncoo

rdM

axim

um v

/c R

atio

: 0.8

7In

ters

ectio

n Si

gnal

Del

ay: 3

0.4

Inte

rsec

tion

LOS:

CIn

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity U

tiliz

atio

n 78

.7%

ICU

Lev

el o

f Ser

vice

DAn

alys

is P

erio

d (m

in) 1

5

Split

s an

d Ph

ases

:

1: In

nisf

il Be

ach

Roa

d &

Yong

e St

reet

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 2

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

TEB

RW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)37

372

8094

533

7012

132

152

102

515

83Id

eal F

low

(vph

pl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Lane

Wid

th

3.0

3.8

3.8

3.0

3.8

3.5

3.0

3.8

3.5

3.0

3.8

3.5

Tota

l Los

t tim

e (s

)6.

66.

65.

06.

66.

66.

86.

86.

85.

06.

86.

8La

ne U

til. F

acto

r1.

000.

951.

000.

951.

001.

000.

951.

001.

000.

951.

00Fr

t1.

000.

971.

001.

000.

851.

001.

000.

851.

001.

000.

85Fl

t Pro

tect

ed0.

951.

000.

951.

001.

000.

951.

001.

000.

951.

001.

00Sa

td. F

low

(pro

t)14

0433

9316

0435

4815

3615

3233

2514

7916

2036

1813

89Fl

t Per

mitt

ed0.

441.

000.

191.

001.

000.

451.

001.

000.

501.

001.

00Sa

td. F

low

(per

m)

653

3393

313

3548

1536

725

3325

1479

859

3618

1389

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor,

PHF

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

Adj.

Flow

(vph

)39

392

8499

561

7412

733

855

107

542

87R

TOR

Red

uctio

n (v

ph)

014

00

052

00

290

035

Lane

Gro

up F

low

(vph

)39

462

099

561

2212

733

826

107

542

52H

eavy

Veh

icle

s (%

)20

%5%

10%

5%4%

4%10

%11

%8%

4%2%

15%

Turn

Typ

ePe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Perm

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPr

otec

ted

Phas

es4

38

21

6Pe

rmitt

ed P

hase

s4

88

22

66

Actu

ated

Gre

en, G

(s)

18.6

18.6

34.4

34.4

34.4

56.5

56.5

56.5

70.3

70.3

70.3

Effe

ctiv

e G

reen

, g (s

)18

.618

.634

.434

.434

.456

.556

.556

.570

.370

.370

.3Ac

tuat

ed g

/C R

atio

0.16

0.16

0.29

0.29

0.29

0.48

0.48

0.48

0.60

0.60

0.60

Cle

aran

ce T

ime

(s)

6.6

6.6

5.0

6.6

6.6

6.8

6.8

6.8

5.0

6.8

6.8

Vehi

cle

Exte

nsio

n (s

)3.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

103

534

209

1033

447

347

1591

708

568

2154

827

v/s

Rat

io P

rot

c0.1

40.

04c0

.16

0.10

0.01

c0.1

5v/

s R

atio

Per

m0.

060.

090.

01c0

.18

0.02

0.10

0.04

v/c

Rat

io0.

380.

860.

470.

540.

050.

370.

210.

040.

190.

250.

06U

nifo

rm D

elay

, d1

44.6

48.5

32.6

35.2

30.1

19.5

17.9

16.4

10.5

11.4

10.0

Prog

ress

ion

Fact

or1.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

00In

crem

enta

l Del

ay, d

22.

313

.61.

70.

60.

03.

00.

30.

10.

20.

30.

1D

elay

(s)

46.9

62.2

34.3

35.8

30.1

22.4

18.2

16.5

10.6

11.7

10.2

Leve

l of S

ervi

ceD

EC

DC

CB

BB

BB

Appr

oach

Del

ay (s

)61

.035

.019

.011

.3Ap

proa

ch L

OS

ED

BB

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yH

CM

Ave

rage

Con

trol D

elay

30.1

HC

M L

evel

of S

ervi

ceC

HC

M V

olum

e to

Cap

acity

ratio

0.51

Actu

ated

Cyc

le L

engt

h (s

) 11

8.1

Sum

of l

ost t

ime

(s)

26.8

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Util

izat

ion

78.7

%IC

U L

evel

of S

ervi

ceD

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

c

Crit

ical

Lan

e G

roup

Page 66: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 3

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

TEB

RW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(veh

/h)

200

268

010

2346

09

667

29

Sign

Con

trol

Stop

Stop

Free

Free

Gra

de0%

0%0%

0%Pe

ak H

our F

acto

r0.

950.

950.

950.

920.

950.

920.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

95H

ourly

flow

rate

(vph

)21

027

90

1124

484

96

707

9Pe

dest

rians

Lane

Wid

th (m

)W

alki

ng S

peed

(m/s

)Pe

rcen

t Blo

ckag

eR

ight

turn

flar

e (v

eh)

Med

ian

type

Non

eN

one

Med

ian

stor

age

veh)

Ups

tream

sig

nal (

m)

49pX

, pla

toon

unb

lock

ed0.

930.

930.

930.

930.

930.

93vC

, con

flict

ing

volu

me

1026

1267

358

926

1262

242

717

494

vC1,

sta

ge 1

con

f vol

vC2,

sta

ge 2

con

f vol

vCu,

unb

lock

ed v

ol87

711

3515

876

911

3024

254

449

4tC

, sin

gle

(s)

7.5

6.5

6.9

7.5

6.5

6.9

4.1

4.1

tC, 2

sta

ge (s

)tF

(s)

3.5

4.0

3.3

3.5

4.0

3.3

2.2

2.2

p0 q

ueue

free

%90

100

9797

100

9997

99cM

cap

acity

(veh

/h)

217

181

799

255

182

759

949

1066

Dire

ctio

n, L

ane

#EB

1W

B 1

NB

1N

B 2

NB

3N

B 4

SB 1

SB 2

Volu

me

Tota

l48

2024

242

242

936

036

3Vo

lum

e Le

ft21

924

00

06

0Vo

lum

e R

ight

2711

00

09

09

cSH

369

404

949

1700

1700

1700

1066

1700

Volu

me

to C

apac

ity0.

130.

050.

030.

140.

140.

010.

010.

21Q

ueue

Len

gth

95th

(m)

3.1

1.1

0.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

Con

trol D

elay

(s)

16.2

14.4

8.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.0

Lane

LO

SC

BA

AAp

proa

ch D

elay

(s)

16.2

14.4

0.4

0.1

Appr

oach

LO

SC

B

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yAv

erag

e D

elay

1.

0In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity U

tiliz

atio

n 35

.7%

ICU

Lev

el o

f Ser

vice

A

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 4

Mov

emen

tEB

TEB

RW

BLW

BTN

BLN

BRLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(veh

/h)

514

1214

686

1111

Sign

Con

trol

Free

Free

Stop

Gra

de0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.95

Hou

rly fl

ow ra

te (v

ph)

541

1315

722

1212

Pede

stria

nsLa

ne W

idth

(m)

Wal

king

Spe

ed (m

/s)

Perc

ent B

lock

age

Rig

ht tu

rn fl

are

(veh

)M

edia

n ty

peN

one

Non

eM

edia

n st

orag

e ve

h)U

pstre

am s

igna

l (m

)56

pX, p

lato

on u

nblo

cked

0.87

0.87

0.87

vC, c

onfli

ctin

g vo

lum

e55

493

827

7vC

1, s

tage

1 c

onf v

olvC

2, s

tage

2 c

onf v

olvC

u, u

nblo

cked

vol

201

641

0tC

, sin

gle

(s)

4.1

6.8

6.9

tC, 2

sta

ge (s

)tF

(s)

2.2

3.5

3.3

p0 q

ueue

free

%99

9799

cM c

apac

ity (v

eh/h

)11

9635

294

8

Dire

ctio

n, L

ane

#EB

1EB

2W

B 1

WB

2W

B 3

NB

1Vo

lum

e To

tal

361

193

1536

136

123

Volu

me

Left

00

150

012

Volu

me

Rig

ht0

130

00

12cS

H17

0017

0011

9617

0017

0051

3Vo

lum

e to

Cap

acity

0.21

0.11

0.01

0.21

0.21

0.05

Que

ue L

engt

h 95

th (m

)0.

00.

00.

30.

00.

01.

0C

ontro

l Del

ay (s

)0.

00.

08.

00.

00.

012

.3La

ne L

OS

AB

Appr

oach

Del

ay (s

)0.

00.

212

.3Ap

proa

ch L

OS

B

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yAv

erag

e D

elay

0.

3In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity U

tiliz

atio

n 29

.0%

ICU

Lev

el o

f Ser

vice

A

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

Page 67: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 1

Lane

Gro

upEB

LEB

TW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)78

507

8736

197

132

560

129

169

361

107

Turn

Typ

ePe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Perm

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPr

otec

ted

Phas

es4

38

21

6Pe

rmitt

ed P

hase

s4

88

22

66

Det

ecto

r Pha

se4

43

88

22

21

66

Switc

h Ph

ase

Min

imum

Initi

al (s

)10

.010

.05.

010

.010

.020

.020

.020

.05.

020

.020

.0M

inim

um S

plit

(s)

25.6

25.6

10.0

26.0

26.0

26.8

26.8

26.8

10.0

27.0

27.0

Tota

l Spl

it (s

)30

.630

.622

.052

.652

.650

.050

.050

.022

.072

.072

.0To

tal S

plit

(%)

24.6

%24

.6%

17.7

%42

.2%

42.2

%40

.1%

40.1

%40

.1%

17.7

%57

.8%

57.8

%Ye

llow

Tim

e (s

)4.

54.

54.

04.

54.

55.

05.

05.

04.

05.

05.

0Al

l-Red

Tim

e (s

)2.

12.

11.

02.

12.

11.

81.

81.

81.

01.

81.

8Lo

st T

ime

Adju

st (s

)0.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

0To

tal L

ost T

ime

(s)

6.6

6.6

5.0

6.6

6.6

6.8

6.8

6.8

5.0

6.8

6.8

Lead

/Lag

Lag

Lag

Lead

Lag

Lag

Lag

Lead

Lead

-Lag

Opt

imiz

e?Ye

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sR

ecal

l Mod

eN

one

Non

eN

one

Non

eN

one

Max

Max

Max

Non

eM

axM

axAc

t Effc

t Gre

en (s

)22

.622

.639

.137

.537

.548

.848

.848

.867

.165

.365

.3Ac

tuat

ed g

/C R

atio

0.19

0.19

0.34

0.32

0.32

0.42

0.42

0.42

0.58

0.56

0.56

v/c

Rat

io0.

460.

860.

440.

330.

170.

390.

380.

180.

390.

190.

13C

ontro

l Del

ay51

.358

.033

.630

.65.

929

.525

.44.

815

.113

.32.

8Q

ueue

Del

ay0.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

0To

tal D

elay

51.3

58.0

33.6

30.6

5.9

29.5

25.4

4.8

15.1

13.3

2.8

LOS

DE

CC

AC

CA

BB

AAp

proa

ch D

elay

57.2

26.7

22.8

12.0

Appr

oach

LO

SE

CC

B

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yC

ycle

Len

gth:

124

.6Ac

tuat

ed C

ycle

Len

gth:

116

.2N

atur

al C

ycle

: 75

Con

trol T

ype:

Sem

i Act

-Unc

oord

Max

imum

v/c

Rat

io: 0

.86

Inte

rsec

tion

Sign

al D

elay

: 29.

4In

ters

ectio

n LO

S: C

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Util

izat

ion

75.2

%IC

U L

evel

of S

ervi

ce D

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

) 15

Split

s an

d Ph

ases

:

1: In

nisf

il Be

ach

Roa

d &

Yong

e St

reet

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 2

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

TEB

RW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(vph

)78

507

6487

361

9713

256

012

916

936

110

7Id

eal F

low

(vph

pl)

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

Lane

Wid

th

3.0

3.8

3.5

3.0

3.8

3.5

3.0

3.8

3.5

3.0

3.8

3.5

Tota

l Los

t tim

e (s

)6.

66.

65.

06.

66.

66.

86.

86.

85.

06.

86.

8La

ne U

til. F

acto

r1.

000.

951.

000.

951.

001.

000.

951.

001.

000.

951.

00Fr

t1.

000.

981.

001.

000.

851.

001.

000.

851.

001.

000.

85Fl

t Pro

tect

ed0.

951.

000.

951.

001.

000.

951.

001.

000.

951.

001.

00Sa

td. F

low

(pro

t)16

3635

2616

6834

8115

8115

3236

1815

8116

6835

8314

93Fl

t Per

mitt

ed0.

531.

000.

151.

001.

000.

531.

001.

000.

341.

001.

00Sa

td. F

low

(per

m)

910

3526

258

3481

1581

852

3618

1581

589

3583

1493

Peak

-hou

r fac

tor,

PHF

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

Adj.

Flow

(vph

)81

528

6791

376

101

138

583

134

176

376

111

RTO

R R

educ

tion

(vph

)0

80

00

680

078

00

49La

ne G

roup

Flo

w (v

ph)

8158

70

9137

633

138

583

5617

637

662

Hea

vy V

ehic

les

(%)

3%2%

10%

1%6%

1%10

%2%

1%1%

3%7%

Turn

Typ

ePe

rmpm

+pt

Perm

Perm

Perm

pm+p

tPe

rmPr

otec

ted

Phas

es4

38

21

6Pe

rmitt

ed P

hase

s4

88

22

66

Actu

ated

Gre

en, G

(s)

22.6

22.6

37.5

37.5

37.5

48.8

48.8

48.8

65.3

65.3

65.3

Effe

ctiv

e G

reen

, g (s

)22

.622

.637

.537

.537

.548

.848

.848

.865

.365

.365

.3Ac

tuat

ed g

/C R

atio

0.19

0.19

0.32

0.32

0.32

0.42

0.42

0.42

0.56

0.56

0.56

Cle

aran

ce T

ime

(s)

6.6

6.6

5.0

6.6

6.6

6.8

6.8

6.8

5.0

6.8

6.8

Vehi

cle

Exte

nsio

n (s

)3.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

03.

0La

ne G

rp C

ap (v

ph)

177

686

203

1123

510

358

1519

664

438

2014

839

v/s

Rat

io P

rot

c0.1

7c0

.04

0.11

0.16

c0.0

40.

10v/

s R

atio

Per

m0.

090.

110.

020.

160.

04c0

.19

0.04

v/c

Rat

io0.

460.

860.

450.

330.

060.

390.

380.

080.

400.

190.

07U

nifo

rm D

elay

, d1

41.4

45.2

29.8

29.9

27.2

23.3

23.3

20.3

13.3

12.5

11.6

Prog

ress

ion

Fact

or1.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

001.

00In

crem

enta

l Del

ay, d

21.

910

.21.

60.

20.

13.

10.

70.

30.

60.

20.

2D

elay

(s)

43.3

55.4

31.4

30.1

27.3

26.4

24.0

20.5

13.9

12.7

11.8

Leve

l of S

ervi

ceD

EC

CC

CC

CB

BB

Appr

oach

Del

ay (s

)54

.029

.823

.912

.8Ap

proa

ch L

OS

DC

CB

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yH

CM

Ave

rage

Con

trol D

elay

29.8

HC

M L

evel

of S

ervi

ceC

HC

M V

olum

e to

Cap

acity

ratio

0.50

Actu

ated

Cyc

le L

engt

h (s

) 11

6.2

Sum

of l

ost t

ime

(s)

16.6

Inte

rsec

tion

Cap

acity

Util

izat

ion

75.2

%IC

U L

evel

of S

ervi

ceD

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

c

Crit

ical

Lan

e G

roup

Page 68: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 3

Mov

emen

tEB

LEB

TEB

RW

BLW

BTW

BRN

BLN

BTN

BRSB

LSB

TSB

RLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(veh

/h)

220

2710

016

2277

817

849

58

Sign

Con

trol

Stop

Stop

Free

Free

Gra

de0%

0%0%

0%Pe

ak H

our F

acto

r0.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

960.

96H

ourly

flow

rate

(vph

)23

028

100

1723

810

188

516

8Pe

dest

rians

Lane

Wid

th (m

)W

alki

ng S

peed

(m/s

)Pe

rcen

t Blo

ckag

eR

ight

turn

flar

e (v

eh)

Med

ian

type

Non

eN

one

Med

ian

stor

age

veh)

Ups

tream

sig

nal (

m)

49pX

, pla

toon

unb

lock

ed0.

950.

950.

950.

950.

950.

95vC

, con

flict

ing

volu

me

1004

1410

262

1159

1397

405

524

828

vC1,

sta

ge 1

con

f vol

vC2,

sta

ge 2

con

f vol

vCu,

unb

lock

ed v

ol90

013

2812

010

6313

1440

539

582

8tC

, sin

gle

(s)

7.5

6.5

6.9

7.5

6.5

6.9

4.1

4.1

tC, 2

sta

ge (s

)tF

(s)

3.5

4.0

3.3

3.5

4.0

3.3

2.2

2.2

p0 q

ueue

free

%89

100

9793

100

9798

99cM

cap

acity

(veh

/h)

210

142

864

159

145

595

1103

799

Dire

ctio

n, L

ane

#EB

1W

B 1

NB

1N

B 2

NB

3N

B 4

SB 1

SB 2

Volu

me

Tota

l51

2723

405

405

1826

626

6Vo

lum

e Le

ft23

1023

00

08

0Vo

lum

e R

ight

2817

00

018

08

cSH

361

290

1103

1700

1700

1700

799

1700

Volu

me

to C

apac

ity0.

140.

090.

020.

240.

240.

010.

010.

16Q

ueue

Len

gth

95th

(m)

3.4

2.1

0.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.0

Con

trol D

elay

(s)

16.6

18.7

8.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.4

0.0

Lane

LO

SC

CA

AAp

proa

ch D

elay

(s)

16.6

18.7

0.2

0.2

Appr

oach

LO

SC

C

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yAv

erag

e D

elay

1.

1In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity U

tiliz

atio

n 32

.1%

ICU

Lev

el o

f Ser

vice

A

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

2019

-01-

04

Prop

osed

Gas

Sta

tion

and

Con

veni

ence

Sto

re, 7

367

Yong

e St

reet

, Inn

isfil

Sync

hro

7 -

Rep

ort

Tran

s-Pl

anPa

ge 4

Mov

emen

tEB

TEB

RW

BLW

BTN

BLN

BRLa

ne C

onfig

urat

ions

Volu

me

(veh

/h)

786

1910

535

1018

Sign

Con

trol

Free

Free

Stop

Gra

de0%

0%0%

Peak

Hou

r Fac

tor

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

Hou

rly fl

ow ra

te (v

ph)

819

2010

557

1019

Pede

stria

nsLa

ne W

idth

(m)

Wal

king

Spe

ed (m

/s)

Perc

ent B

lock

age

Rig

ht tu

rn fl

are

(veh

)M

edia

n ty

peN

one

Non

eM

edia

n st

orag

e ve

h)U

pstre

am s

igna

l (m

)57

pX, p

lato

on u

nblo

cked

0.84

0.84

0.84

vC, c

onfli

ctin

g vo

lum

e83

911

2841

9vC

1, s

tage

1 c

onf v

olvC

2, s

tage

2 c

onf v

olvC

u, u

nblo

cked

vol

435

778

0tC

, sin

gle

(s)

4.1

6.8

6.9

tC, 2

sta

ge (s

)tF

(s)

2.2

3.5

3.3

p0 q

ueue

free

%99

9698

cM c

apac

ity (v

eh/h

)94

527

791

4

Dire

ctio

n, L

ane

#EB

1EB

2W

B 1

WB

2W

B 3

NB

1Vo

lum

e To

tal

546

293

1027

927

929

Volu

me

Left

00

100

010

Volu

me

Rig

ht0

200

00

19cS

H17

0017

0094

517

0017

0050

2Vo

lum

e to

Cap

acity

0.32

0.17

0.01

0.16

0.16

0.06

Que

ue L

engt

h 95

th (m

)0.

00.

00.

20.

00.

01.

3C

ontro

l Del

ay (s

)0.

00.

08.

90.

00.

012

.6La

ne L

OS

AB

Appr

oach

Del

ay (s

)0.

00.

212

.6Ap

proa

ch L

OS

B

Inte

rsec

tion

Sum

mar

yAv

erag

e D

elay

0.

3In

ters

ectio

n C

apac

ity U

tiliz

atio

n 32

.3%

ICU

Lev

el o

f Ser

vice

A

Anal

ysis

Per

iod

(min

)15

Page 69: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

APPENDIX DLevel of Service Definitions

Page 70: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,
Page 71: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,
Page 72: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

APPENDIX E Town of Innisfil Zoning By-law, Excerpts

Page 73: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

Page 37 Section 2 Definitions

Town of Innisfil Zoning By-law 080-13 COUNCIL ADOPTED

including amendments up to July, 2018

2.133 Modular Home means a factory built home which is a dwelling unit designed and built to be transported on its own chassis or frame. It may contain parts that can be folded, collapsed, or telescoped when being towed and expanded later to provide additional floor space. It can also be two or more separately towable components that are joined on the chosen site. The modular home is designed for long term year round occupancy. It has facilities for cooking, eating, living, sleeping and sanitation. A modular home does not include a park model mobile home trailer, travel trailer, tent trailer or trailer otherwise designed. For the purposes of this definition, a modular home having an A277 Standard is permitted, while those having either a Z240, Z241 Standard or a combination of either of these with the A277 Standard are not permitted.

2.134 Motel means premises that contain rooms with no private cooking facilities that are rented

on a temporary basis to the public with each room being accessed from the outside. 2.135 Motor Vehicle means an automobile, motorcycle, a motor-assisted bicycle, as amended,

and any other vehicle propelled or driven otherwise than by muscular power. 2.136 Motor Vehicle, Commercial means a motor vehicle used in association with a

commercial or industrial use and has a gross weight (inclusive of load, if applicable) of more than 2,250 kg.

2.137 Motor Vehicle Body Shop means a building or place used as a motor vehicle repair

shop including auto body repairs and spray painting and where motor vehicle fuelling, application of lubricants and related mechanical repairs, washing or cleaning of motor vehicles may be carried out.

2.138 Motor Vehicle Dealership means premises where new or used automobiles or

motorcycles are sold, leased or rented and which may include an accessory motor vehicle repair garage, an accessory motor vehicle body shop or the retail sale of motor vehicle accessories and products as an accessory use.

2.139 Motor Vehicle Gas Bar means premises used for the sale of fuels for motor vehicles

and/or a facility where motor vehicles may be oiled and greased. 2.140 Motor Vehicle Repair Garage means premises used for the repair of motor vehicles

and commercial motor vehicles. 2.141 Motor Vehicle Service Station means a building or place used for the sale of fuels for

motor vehicles, and which may include an accessory motor vehicle washing establishment, the accessory sale of motor vehicle accessories, or an accessory convenience store, but does not include the activities otherwise undertaken at a motor vehicle repair garage or a motor vehicle body shop.

2.142 Motor Vehicle Washing Establishment means a building or structure for the operation

of motor vehicle washing, including self-service or automatic motor vehicle washing. 2.143 Municipal By-Law Enforcement Officer means the officer or employee of the Town of

Innisfil with the duty of enforcing the provisions of municipal by-laws.

2.141 Motor Vehicle Service Station means a building or place used for the sale of fuels for motor vehicles, and which may include an accessory motor vehicle washingestablishment, the accessory sale of motor vehicle accessories, or an accessoryconvenience store, but does not include the activities otherwise undertaken at a motor vehicle repair garage or a motor vehicle body shop.

Page 74: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

Page 75 Section 3 General Provisions

Town of Innisfil Zoning By-law 080-13 COUNCIL ADOPTED

including amendments up to July, 2018

Use Minimum Number of Parking Spaces area

l) Funeral home 1 parking space for every four (4) persons to be accommodated in the design capacity of the buildings

m) Golf course 5.5 parking spaces per hole, plus the parking spaces required for other accessory uses

n) Hotel or motel 1 parking space for every guest room plus any parking spaces required for any accessory uses, such as a restaurant, in accordance with this By-law

o) Marina 1 parking space for every boat slip plus any parking spaces required for any accessory uses, such as a restaurant, in accordance with this By-law

p) Medical office 1 parking space for every 15 square metres of gross floor area

q) Motor vehicle dealership

5 parking spaces or 1 parking space for every 23 square metres of gross floor area to a maximum of fifty spaces (excluding outdoor display and storage of vehicles), whichever is greater, plus four (4) parking spaces per repair bay

r) Motor vehicle service station

1 parking space for every 23 square metres of gross floor area

s) Motor vehicle repair garage, motor vehicle body shop

4 parking spaces per repair bay

t) Personal service establishment

1 parking space for every 28 square metres of gross floor area

u) Place of entertainment 3 parking spaces for each bowling lane and 1 parking space for every three seats in a theatre. For all other uses, 1 parking space shall be required for every 23 square metres of gross floor area

v) Professional office 1 parking space for every 28 square metres of gross floor area on the first floor plus 1 parking space for every 37 square metres of gross floor area above the first floor

w) Private club 1 parking space for every 4 persons that can be accommodated in the design capacity of the buildings

x) Recreational vehicle sales establishment

1 parking space for every 50 square metres of gross floor area

y) Restaurant 1 parking space for every 8 square metres of gross floor area which is accessible to patrons or 1 parking space for every 4 persons that can be accommodated in the design capacity of the building, whichever is greater

z) Restaurant, take-out 1 parking space for every 6 square metres of gross floor area which is accessible to patrons or 1 parking space for every 4 persons that can be accommodated in the design capacity of the building, whichever is greater

aa) Retail store 1 parking space for every 19 square metres of gross

Motor vehicle service 1 parking space for every 23 square metres of gross station floor area

Page 75: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

APPENDIX F Town of Innisfil Engineering Design Standards, Excerpts

Page 76: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

Town of Innisfil Engineering Design Standards and Specifications

SECTION 2.0: ROADWAYS

MAY 2016 Page 24

prohibit the use of lesser grades. The minimum grade permitted is 2%. Maximum grade change shall be 4% at curb or sidewalk and 1% per 2.0 metres average.

2.4.4.12.2 Location

Urban

All residential driveways shall be located in accordance with the setbacks as identified in Appendix C – Minimum Offset Matrix. On corner residential lots, the edge of driveway is to be a minimum of 4.5 metres from the end of the daylight triangle. Non-residential entrances shall not be located within 15.0 m of any intersection and any ramps shall have a minimum level stopping distance of 6.0 m provided between the ramp and the street.

Rural On rural roadways, the end of the driveway culvert shall not be closer than 1.5 metres from the extension of the side yard property line. The same conditions apply for rural non-residential entrances as those listed for urban non-residential above. For both urban and rural situations where frontage or other limitations interfere with standard locations, site specific solutions shall be provided for review and approval by the Town. 2.4.4.12.3 Driveway Pairing

Pairing of driveways is required for all residential lots with a frontage of less than 14.0 m and where the road grade does not exceed 2.5%.

2.4.4.12.4 Driveway Width For a residential driveway, the minimum width is 3.0 m and the maximum width shall be equal to sixty percent (60%) of the lot frontage to a maximum of 9.0 m between street line and curb line.].

For a non-residential, two-way entrance, the minimum width is 7.0 m measured at street line. Site specific zoning regulations apply. Water service/curb stop are to be a minimum of 1.0 m from the edge of the driveway.

The same conditions apply for rural non-residential entrances as those listed for urban non-residential above.

Non-residential entrances shall not be located within 15.0 m of any intersection andany ramps shall have a minimum level stopping distance of 6.0 m provided betweenthe ramp and the street.

For a non-residential, two-way entrance, the minimum width is 7.0 m measured atstreet line. Site specific zoning regulations apply.

Page 77: Trans-Plan 7367YongeStreetInnisfil TrafficImpactStudy · Based on a review of the Town of Innisfil planning applications, there is one other notable development in the study area,

Town of Innisfil Engineering Design Standards and Specifications

SECTION 2.0: ROADWAYS

MAY 2016 Page 25

2.4.4.12.5 Radius

For non-residential entrances, the minimum curb radius is 6.0 m, but may need to be greater to accommodate truck traffic and emergency services. The end of the curb radius at street line should not extend beyond property line.

2.4.4.12.6 Driveway Edging

For residential driveways, raised edging using concrete curbing or other materials along the sides of the driveway is not permitted within the Town road allowance, but may be constructed on private property.

2.4.4.12.7 Medians/Islands

The use of medians or islands at intersections and entrances for signalization, entrance/exit control, or aesthetics will be considered by the Town on a case by case basis.

For residential driveways, between the back of curb and property line, the driveway entrance shall have a minimum of 150mm of Granular ‘A’ and 50mm HL3 surface asphalt or other hard surface as approved by the Town. For non-residential entrances, the minimum pavement structure shall be 300mm of Granular ‘B’, 150mm of Granular ‘A’, 50 mm HL4, and 40mm HL3. For fire routes, the minimum pavement structure shall be 400 mm of Granular ‘B’, 150 mm Granular ‘A’, 70 mm HL4 and 40 mm HL3. A more stringent pavement structure may be required and must be confirmed by the Geotechnical Engineer. A lesser pavement structure, with a single lift of asphalt, may be considered for general parking areas outside of the fire route, with consideration for delivery vehicle needs.

2.4.4.13 Walkways

The Town has various types of walkways and different requirements for each. It is recommended that the requirements for walkways be discussed with the Town prior to commencing the engineering design. The following provides general requirements for three typical walkways.

Pedestrian Walkways and Park Maintenance Pathways

Where the walkway block is to serve only pedestrians or where it is to be used as an entrance to an Open Space Block or Park Area and may be used by maintenance equipment, the walkway is to be 3 metres wide with a 1.5 m chain link fence along each side of the walkway block. The walkway shall be concrete for the full 3 metre

For non-residential entrances, the minimum curb radius is 6.0 m, but may need to begreater to accommodate truck traffic and emergency services.