training of selected spis and mmdas on household toilets gama sanitation and water...
TRANSCRIPT
TRAINING OF SELECTED SPIs AND MMDAs ON HOUSEHOLD TOILETS
GAMA SANITATION AND WATER PROJECT
JOINTLY CONDUCTED BY:
THE PROJECT COORDINATING UNIT OF THE GREATER ACCRA
METROPOLITAN AREA SANITATION AND WATER PROJECT (GAMA SWP)
UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE MINISTRY OF SANITATION AND WATER
WITH THE FACILITATION OF DR. PETER OWUSU-ANTWI
MARCH, 2018
1 | S P I a n d M M D A T r a i n i n g R e p o r t
SPI AND MMDA TRAINING ON HOUSEHOLD TOILET REPORT
Held on 14th - 16th March, 2018 at Institute of Local Government Studies, Ogbojo Madina
1. Introduction
The Greater Accra Metropolitan Area Sanitation and Water Project (GAMA SWP) has
currently constructed over 3,000 household toilet facilities. About 98 % of these household
installations comprise of bio-digesters with the remaining 2 % made up of the traditional toilets
such as septic tanks, pit latrines etc. Peculiar ground conditions such as limited space for
installation, complex layout making homes inaccessible, high water table area etc. have
necessitated the use of these bio-digesters predominantly on the project.
With the growing trends, it was necessary to conduct this training workshop to equip
participants with knowledge and skills to address some identified and reoccurring challenges
with the construction of household facilities and education of users on proper operation and
maintenance of the facility.
The Project Coordinating Unit (PCU) as the coordinators of the process appointed Dr. Peter
Owusu-Antwi to facilitate the training of SPIs and MMDAs under a 3-day training workshop
and the key stages of the process included the following:
i. Initial consultative meeting between the PCU to agree on the framework for the
training workshop,
ii. Selection of thematic areas on household toilet construction, operation and
maintenance,
iii. Preparation of demonstration materials for the training workshop,
iv. Conducting of training workshop for SPIs and MMDAs,
v. Presentation of report on training workshop.
This report focuses on the proceedings of the training workshop conducted for key
stakeholders1. The Validation Workshop had three main objectives as follows:
a) Review of excreta management options and the basis for their applicability
b) Overview of Bio-digesters
c) Designs and costing of bio-digesters
d) Siting and installation considerations
e) Operation and maintenance of bio-digesters
After going through these key objectives, the training was expected to achieve the following:
I. Review and understand key issues associated with construction of household toilets;
II. Equip SPIs and MMDAs to be able to understand the rationale behind building
sustainable household toilets;
1 The list of stakeholders who participated is attached as an appendix
2 | S P I a n d M M D A T r a i n i n g R e p o r t
III. Address issues associated with construction of bio-digesters in particular;
IV. Understand the Do’s and Don’ts when using bio-digesters;
2. Key challenges associated with bad construction of bio-digesters
Based on past constructions, it was observed that poorly constructed bio-digesters had the
following problems; and the training workshop sought to address these practically:
I. Bio-digesters getting full
II. Bio-digesters getting flooded
III. Poorly constructed drain fields discharging effluent into the open.
IV. Number of users exceeding the stipulated designed number of users e.g. 10 users/day
for standard digesters
3. Brief Description of the Biofil Toilet Technology
The Biofil Toilet System is an on-site faecal matter
treatment system. It was designed and developed
by Mr. Kweku Akuam Anno of Biological Filters
and Composters Ltd (BIOFILCOM). It comes as a
flush and microflush unit. As a flush unit, it
typically replaces the septic tank by receiving and
treating faecal matter directly from the water
closets or pourflush seat. As a microflush unit, the
superstructure sits on top of the biofil digester and
faecal matter is directly discharged into the
digester by the microflush seat with the release of
a foot flap and/or a pourflush seat. The microflush
seat is uniquely designed to use wastewater from a
hand washbasin; first as a water seal and secondly
as flush water to discharge faecal matter into the
digester. The operation of the biofil digester
whether used as a flush unit or microflush unit has
similar operational functions: flush water
undergoes rapid solid-liquid separation through a
porous filter; the solid waste is retained in a
‘digester’ chamber where it accelerates
decomposition into biosolids by the activities of
micro and macro-organisms.
The effluent (liquid) after solid-liquid separation undergoes bio-filtration via sub-surface
infiltration or through a sand media before being discharged into open drains.
3 | S P I a n d M M D A T r a i n i n g R e p o r t
The Biofil system brings together the benefits of the traditional flush toilet/septic tank system
and the ecological sanitation (ECOSAN) concept whilst eliminating the drawbacks of both
technologies (the need for large amounts of space, regular emptying, challenges with high water
table, and constant awareness raising on appropriate use).
4. Workshop proceedings, decisions and recommendations
The workshop was facilitated using the following key thematic areas:
i. Review of excreta management options and the basis for their applicability
ii. Overview of Bio-digesters
iii. Designs and costing of bio-digesters
iv. Siting and installation considerations
v. Operation and maintenance of bio-digesters
The outcome of the workshop discussions have been presented below.
i. Review of excreta management options and the basis for their applicability
The stakeholders particularly the MMDAs were taking through the various household toilet
technologies currently being used in the communities. The need to understand the design
principles of such household toilet facilities (e.g. number of users) and their applicability
were outlined. Plate 1.0 shows examples of onsite sanitation technologies currently being
used.
Plate 1: occurrence of on-site household toilets in urban areas
Stakeholders knew of the various technological options. They understood improved sanitation
and the construction of traditional facilities such as the VIP, KVIP and septic tanks.
Notwithstanding, their principles of operation was still not understood. The stakeholders who
they knew some details on the components of the facility did not understand the operations of
the bio-digesters and how it worked at the start of the training sessions.
Bucket latrine Pit latrine VIP KVIP ECL WC/septic tank Bio-digester
4 | S P I a n d M M D A T r a i n i n g R e p o r t
Observations and deductions from workshop:
The training reviewed that most of the Environmental Health Officers of the MMDAs
who have the mandate for approving household toilets lacked understanding of the
operating principles, design considerations and operation of the prevailing on-site
sanitation technologies
Though EHOs knew of the KVIP and septic tank design, their principles of operations
were not understood.
Key recommendations
There needs to be a detailed training on the occurrence and trends of on-site household
sanitation; their design principles, siting considerations, operation/maintenance, post-
construction issues for EHOs and the technical teams of the MMDAs.
A detailed training program targeting the EHOs and technical teams of the various
MMDAs is very on the Bio-digesters (rate of fill, principles of bio-solids accumulation
and reduction, effects of household chemicals on the operating processes, determination
of the lifespan, and how to revise bio-digesters that have been abused).
ii. Overview of Bio-digesters
The genesis of the bio-digesters and their operating principles were explained during the
training workshop. The Bio-digester is locally produced and the production does not lead to
adverse effect on the environment. With respect to the discharge of the filtered liquid waste
from the digester, it was noted that the effluent could only be discharged into the sub-soil in
areas with low water table with a clearance of approximately 1.5m from the groundwater table.
In the event where installations have to be done in high water table areas, there is the need to
incorporate a sand filter before discharge into drains or the open. It was established at the
workshop that the effluent from the bio-digester was rich in nutrients after removal of some
contaminants and could be used for other purposes such as irrigation. It was noted that
BIOFILCOM has also developed various treatment options for wastewater polishing which
could be used together with bio-digesters and failed septic tanks in particular in high water
table areas.
At the end of the training workshop, the stakeholders gained appreciation of what bio-digesters
are and how they work.
5 | S P I a n d M M D A T r a i n i n g R e p o r t
Plate 2: Presentation on the overview of bio-digesters and related topics
iii. Designs considerations of bio-digesters
It was established that user satisfaction was high because it takes comparatively less time to
install, it requires far less space requirement, generally no experiences of odour and it can be
installed in areas with high water table. However, some stakeholders were not convinced that
the bio-digester could last up to 10, 20, 30 years to get full because of its relatively small size.
It was established that there are various configurations of the bio-digester per a number of
users/day. It was also established that the standard digester in particular was designed for 10
users/day and you need not desludge as a result of fill up if applied as such. However, it was
established at the workshop that low-income households particular understate their user
population which led to some bio-digesters filling up. In the event where households exceeded
this number, it was inevitably to provide multiple bio-digesters.
The workshop established key considerations for design of bio-digesters as:
I. Stocking density
II. Solid loading
III. Bulking material for effective vermicomposting
IV. Effective solid/liquid separation for vermicomposting
V. Effluent management
6 | S P I a n d M M D A T r a i n i n g R e p o r t
Key recommendations
There is the need to conduct a study on the determination of the optimum household
hydraulic loading rate for Bio-digesters
iv. Siting and installation considerations
The workshop revealed that the following key factors were crucial to the performance of bio-
digesters during their installation:
I. Water table
II. Type of toilet seat
III. Venting
IV. Number of users
It was observed that all but the “number of user” was considered strictly during installation.
Emphasis was out on the need to establish correctly the number of users during site visits prior
to installations.
Plate 3: Interactions with a Project Engineer on the siting and installation considerations
7 | S P I a n d M M D A T r a i n i n g R e p o r t
Observations and deductions from workshop:
Most SPIs do not conduct site visit prior to installations
EHOs and SPIs have been advising beneficiaries not to flush down their toilet/tissue
paper into the bio-digesters for fear that it could encourage the flushing down of all
other non-degradable materials; but most importantly there was a lack of understanding
on the need to flush down tissue paper.
v. Operation and maintenance of bio-digesters
It was established that the requirement for operation and maintenance of the bio-digesters was
minimal and can be handled by users. It was also noted that the operational challenge for the
digester to function effectively related to how to ensure that inappropriate anal cleansing
materials which are not biodegradable (e.g. cloth, plastic, sticks) are not used. This was
established as a purely behavioural issue.
There was a lot of confusion on the part of the SPIs and other stakeholders on whether to flush
down tissue paper or not into the bio-digester. It was thought that if flushed down would cause
early fill-up of the bio-digester. It was established that tissue paper is high in carbon and need
by the bio-digester for effective decomposition of faecal matter.
Additionally, issues related to the use and effect of chemical household cleaning agents were
discussed. It was established at the workshop that these chemicals only target the toilet seat
where it is applied to “kill” germs after which water is used to rinse and flush down into the
bio-digesters. The rinsing and flushing with water dilutes the concentration of the active
ingredients in these cleaning reagents there by lowering their effect on the functioning of the
bio-digesters. It was established that the bio-digester could only be compromised with for some
reason a user deliberately or accidentally pour a whole bottle of such household chemicals
through the toilet bowl. It was also established that detergents such as “powdered soap”, bar
soap etc. could be safely used for cleaning the toilet with any adverse effects.
Other operations and maintenance procedures such as how to know if a digester was working
well were discussed. This including putting a clean out on the drain field pipe as an inspection
chamber to know if bio-digesters are submerged with water.
8 | S P I a n d M M D A T r a i n i n g R e p o r t
Plate 4: Facilitator showing stakeholders how to identify problems on the bio-digester
Key recommendations
There is an urgent need to strategically package information about the bio-digester
technology particularly on the operation and maintenance.
A clear message should be disseminated on the use of only tissue paper for anal
cleansing in the bio-digester and should be flushed down after use.
5. Questions and Answers
The training workshop was very interactive with many questions centering on the following
key areas:
I. What research has been done on the volumes of water to be flushed per day into the
bio-digester?
II. Can bio-digesters be used as dry toilets as in the case of KVIPs?
III. Can other wastewater from the house (kitchen, bathroom etc.) be connected to the bio-
digester?
IV. Should tissue paper be flushed into the bio-digester?
V. What happens when bio-digesters are full and how one should desludge?
VI. What is the life span of the bio-digester?
9 | S P I a n d M M D A T r a i n i n g R e p o r t
Plate 5: Session for questions and answers
6. Summary of Discussion and Decision
At end of the discussions all participants concluded that the bio-digesters had a huge potential
of contributing immensely to improving the coverage of sanitation in Ghana and at this stage
satisfies (or at least has a high potential to overcome its shortfalls) most of the sustainability
indicators. Stakeholders had a fair knowledge on what bio-digesters are, how they works and
how to prolong their usage.
7. Recommended Action Areas
- Communitywide messaging: Strategic expansion on promotional
activities/messaging to make the technology well known and understood in the
project communities particularly among the EHU. This may require strategic
collaboration with the District Environmental Health Unit.
- User Education and Construction manual: Development of educational materials
to guide users in the proper use and maintenance of the technology. The user
education should be conducted based on properly designed Operation and
Maintenance guidelines/manual to ensure proper use of the facility.
- Training of technical team and EHU: Additional detailed training should be
conducted for the EHU of the MMDAs and Project Engineers who approve all on-
site household facilities and supervise project construction.
- Additional research on bio-digesters: Additional research needs to conducted on
the bio-digesters in the area of hydraulic loading and its effects for instance;
introduction of enzymes and other bulking material in the bio-digester and its effect
on faecal matter reduction and/or filling of bio-digesters.