tradition in transition revised edition may 2010

Upload: lkomakech

Post on 07-Apr-2018

227 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    1/48

    Working Paper No. 1

    Revised Edition May 2010

    Building Consensus onSustainable Peace in Uganda

    Beyond Juba

    Drawing on The Old to Develop a New Jurisprudence

    for Dealing with Ugandas Legacy of Violence

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    2/48

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    3/48

    Beyond Juba i

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    Acronyms

    ADF Allied Democrac Forces

    DRC Democrac Republic of Congo

    NRM Naonal Resistance Movement

    NRA Naonal Resistance Army

    LRA Lords Resistance Army

    LRM Lords Resistance Movement

    ICG Internaonal Crisis Group

    FEDEMO Federal Democrac Movement

    UNLA Uganda Naonal Liberaon Front

    UPDM Uganda Peoples Democrac Movement

    UPDA Uganda Peoples Democrac ArmyUPDF Uganda Peoples Defence Force

    ICC Internaonal Criminal Court

    PRDP Peace Recovery and Development Plan for Northern Uganda

    GoU Government of Uganda

    UNOCHA United Naons Oce for the Coordinaon of Humanitarian Aairs

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    4/48

    Beyond Jubaii

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    Contents

    Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ ...........i

    Execuve Summary ..................................................................................................................iii

    Key Findings ...............................................................................................................................v

    Key recommendaons ..............................................................................................................vi

    To the government: ..................................................................................................................vi

    General recommendaons ......................................................................................................vii

    1.0 Introducon ........................................................................................................................ 1

    1.1 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 3

    1.2 Background: The Legacy of Conicts .................................................................................. 3

    1. 3 Policy Context .................................................................................................................... 7

    2. A Jurisprudence of Tradional Jusce ................................................................................. 8

    2.1 Cleansing, Cooling and Welcoming .................................................................................... 9

    2.2 Punishment and Retribuve Aspects of Tradional Jusce .............................................. 11

    2.3 Truth-Telling, Dialogue and Responsibility ....................................................................... 13

    2.4 Material Compensaon as Reparaons ........................................................................... 15

    2.5 Reconciliaon and Forgiveness ........................................................................................ 19

    3.0 Tradional Jusce Today ................................................................................................... 22

    3.1 The Contemporary Role and Status of Tradional Leaders .............................................. 22

    3.2 The Relaonship between Religion and Tradion ............................................................ 24

    3.3 The Role and Treatment of Women and Children in the Pracces ................................... 25

    3.4. The Relaonship of Tradional Jusce to Formal Jusce Structures ............................... 26

    3.5 The Relevance of Tradional Pracces to Abuses Commied as part of Mass Conicts...28

    4. Codicaon of Tradional Jusce: A Three Track Approach ............................................. 30

    Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 34

    Bibliography............................................................................................................................ 35

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    5/48

    Beyond Juba iii

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    Execuve Summary

    This paper explores the potenal role of tradional jusce pracces from across several communies in

    northern Uganda in a naonal transional jusce process. To understand its importance to this process

    requires an acknowledgment of the unique and unusual transion in which Uganda nds itself. This

    paper aims to complement Ugandas Jusce Law and Order Sectors (JLOS) on-going transional jusce

    iniaves and in parcular aempts to demonstrate how local tradional jusce perspecves may beinjected into the on-going debate on naonal transional jusce mechanisms. The paper examines the

    mulple legacies le by the interlocking conicts that have plagued the Acholi, Lango and Teso regions

    since independence, and makes recommendaons about how to include principles of tradional jusce

    into established law.

    In Teso, the Uganda Peoples Army (UPA) rebellion, Karimojong cale raids, and the LRA conict le a legacy

    of resentment toward the Naonal Resistance Movement (NRM) government, the Karimojong and the

    Acholi people. The longest running episodes of violence remain with the Karimojong, who consistently

    conduct cale raids in the region. The UPA rebellion from 1986 to 1992, and the LRA incursion which

    occurred in 2003, also caused devastaon in the region. The legacies of conict were slightly dierent inLango than they were in Teso. There was less overt bierness toward the NRM government; however,

    there was a striking resentment toward Idi Amin and the damage his regime inicted. In addion, there

    was a lingering bierness toward the Acholi as a result of the LRA conict. In the Acholi region, the legacy

    of conict pertained almost exclusively to the conict between the NRM government and the LRA, with

    feelings of resentment divided evenly between the NRM government and the LRA. The overlapping and

    interrelated nature of this mulplicity of conicts and their legacies indicated a need to ulise jusce

    pracces that could be relevant and resonate with a wide range of communies to address conicts both

    within and between them.

    From the research, there is evidence that tradional pracces connue to enjoy a degree of grass-roots

    support and correspond to local noons of jusce. However, it remains unclear to what extent these

    pracces could address abuses perpetrated in the course of conict, how (if at all) they could be adapted

    for contemporary applicaon, whether or not formal codicaon of tradional principles into naonal

    law is desirable, and to what extent such pracces must be allowed to remain exible. Ulmately, the

    eecve integraon of tradional jusce principles could make an important contribuon to what

    Agenda Item 3 of the Juba Peace Agreement suggests should be the widest naonal ownership of the

    accountability and reconciliaon process.

    This policy debate is part of a broader narrave currently underway in Uganda as the country struggles to

    confront its history of conicts and moves towards a shared naonal identy. While the role that tradional

    jusce pracces will play in the transional jusce process and in potenally broader legal reforms hasbeen widely researched and discussed within both academic and policy circles, the paper nds that there

    is no consensus regarding its relevance. Applying tradional pracces from dierent regions aected by

    war, as well as, harmonising their relaons with one another remains far from complete.

    The specic nature of the tradional jusce pracces from the Acholi, Lango and Teso regions varied a

    great deal. Yet, drawing on accounts of past and present use of the pracces, as well as, descripons

    from all three of the dierent regions, this research suggested ve fundamental principles or elements at

    the centre of such pracces in the three regions. The ve elements were 1) cleansing and welcoming, 2)

    punishment, 3) truth-telling and responsibility, 4) reparaons (which includes material compensaon),

    and 5) reconciliaon and forgiveness. Tradional jusce also had retribuve aspects that have not beenfocused on by previous research. The ve common elements were expressed in a variety of pracces

    intended to address dierent abuses ranging from intenonal killings, to adultery, and prolonged absence

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    6/48

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    7/48

    Beyond Juba v

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    Key Findings

    The ndings from this study suggest that tradional jusce pracces have both naonal and local

    relevance, and could contribute immensely toward addressing both the legacies of the major conicts in

    the region and day-to-day social infracons. Tradional jusce pracces, though pracced with variable

    frequency, are widely respected in principle, and their value highlighted the shortcomings of the formal

    jusce process in its ability to deliver in an accessible fashion. From the research, there was both adesire for increased applicaon of the pracces at a local level, and an implicit desire for the principles

    of this system to be reected in naonal transional jusce and potenal reforms in Ugandas basic

    legal structures. While a local accountability and reconciliaon mechanism on its own would struggle

    to address the abuses commied by the Ugandan government forces during the conicts in Acholi,

    Lango and Teso, naonal mechanisms which have no local roots are unlikely to be suciently accessible

    or responsive to the needs of the aected communies. This therefore suggests that a mul-ered

    approach to transional jusce with naonal, regional and local mechanisms will be necessary if the

    legacy of conicts in the three regions is to be appropriately addressed and indeed if the naonal legal

    system were to reect communal values. The queson then becomes how the ve principles idened

    by this research could be integrated into a naonal transional jusce process

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    8/48

    Beyond Jubavi

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    Key recommendaons

    To the government:

    The implementaon of post-conict transional jusce, as well as, return to civilian administraon is

    conngent on an end to conict. On 14 December 2008, the allied forces of the UPDF, the Democrac

    Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Government of Southern Sudan (GoSS), launched a military campaigncodenamed, Operaon Lightning Thunder, against the LRA. The failure of that operaon to achieve its

    stated military objecve and its sudden withdrawal on the 15th March, 2009 should be a clear signal that

    a negoated selement oers the best hope to ending the conict in northern Uganda.

    Given the widespread scepcism of the Ugandan Government throughout the three regions coupled

    with the value that many respondents placed on the hands-on nature of tradional jusce indicated that

    it should have a prominent place in the naonal transional jusce process. Indeed following the GoU

    commitment and readiness to implement elements of the Juba Peace agreements relang to it, polical

    leadersin parcular those in parliament and the presidency need to lend support and give backing to a

    comprehensive transional jusce process by ensuring that JLOS, has the necessary nancial and human

    resources to not only design a naonal transional jusce policy but to also implement such a policy in

    earnest and without undue interference. Current naonal jusce structures appeared unresponsive to

    local needs and values, and the void le by shortcomings of these structures were being lled by locally

    pracced tradional mechanisms. From the research, therefore, both rural communies and members

    of the formal jusce process voiced scepcism regarding the degree to which jusce was accessible,

    voicing frustraon with corrupon in the system, confusion regarding the process and the legal expenses

    required to navigate the court system, overall leaving percepons of a juvenile legal system. Access to

    jusce should be enhanced by increasing funding for legal reform.

    Of parcular relevance to conict aected areas, the level of inter-ethnic tensions which lingered just

    below the surface of seemingly placid relaons indicates that further dialogue and interacon is vital forachieving a lasng peace in the region. Meengs between Lango and Acholi cultural leaders have already

    had some success in migang such tension but further eorts are required. In designing a transional

    jusce process, deliberate eort should focus on community-to-community dialogues, clearly delineang

    and taking into account the cultural jurisdiconal issues that exist between the dierent communies

    aected by conict.

    The issue of how women and youths are involved (or not) in tradional jusce poses one of the greatest

    challenges to any contemporary use of the pracces themselves as part of a broader transional

    jusce strategy. In parcular, womens roles in the administraon of tradional jusce processes are

    minimal, and while changing, such changes have been slow. Predominantly, women were not allowed toadminister the pracces, though there were some excepons regarding welcoming pracces which could

    be conducted by women. To this end, tradional instuons need to be adapted by removing repugnant

    elements and allowing for a much more inclusive process.

    From the research, most respondents strongly supported reparaons, parcularly material compensaon

    for vicms of abuses. Views regarding who should be responsible for paying compensaon varied

    among respondents, who aributed responsibility to both LRA and the government. A comprehensive

    reparaons policy was seen as providing closure and clearly understood to be dierent from general post

    conict reconstrucon arrangements such as the PRDP. While post-conict reconstrucon was seen as

    necessary, it was also perceived to be an indicator of governmental failure in its obligaon to protect andtherefore reecve of ordinary governmental dues.

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    9/48

    Beyond Juba vii

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    General Recommendaons

    Given the colossal nature of the above undertaking, there is no doubt that the GoUs meagre resources

    will be inadequate to pay reparaons. It is therefore recommended that bilateral and mullateral donor

    agencies scale up their assistance to the government ring-fencing resources for a naonal transional

    jusce process.

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    10/48

    Beyond Juba 1

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    1.0 Introducon

    To date, all Ugandas aempts at a transional jusce process have been iniated by the regimes in

    power and have not been accompanied by a polical transformaon or by wide-ranging systemic reforms

    in governance. The rst aempt, in 1974, took the form of a commission charged with invesgang

    disappearances throughout the country.1 This eort focused on the Idi Amin regime, itself notorious for

    human rights abuses. The second signicant aempt began in 1987, when the new regime put in place

    another commission to invesgate human rights violaons commied in the country since independence.2

    While this laer process has since been dubbed as an example of victors jusce (Hayner, 2002), it is

    signicant since the commission recommended amnesty for acts of genocide and rape. This was certainly

    progressive for the me, and ancipated more recent addions to internaonal jurisprudence.

    The Juba peace talks between the Government of Uganda and the LRA, which began in 2006, and by late

    2008 resulted in the signing of a number of agreements including an agreement entled Agenda Item 2

    on Comprehensive Soluons3 to the Conict and Agenda Item 3 on Accountability and Reconciliaon (and

    its Annexure). These set out a broad framework for a transional jusce policy.4 While the full import of

    Juba needs claricaon, parcularly with respect to the relaonship between tradional jusce pracces

    and formal criminal law, it is indicave of strong commitment by the signatories to a comprehensivetransional jusce process. Juba, in eect, started the transional jusce discussion in the country.

    The transional jusce processes now under discussion in Uganda have the potenal to signicantly alter

    the countrys polical framework with respect to transparency, jusce for vicms, and an understanding

    this governments role in the current northern conict and that of previous governments since

    independence. There has been no regime change since 1986, yet the country is at mes described as

    being in an as yet incomplete transion from a one-party state to a mul-party democracy. This in itself

    has numerous ramicaons for the stability of the country.5 Added to this is a precedent-seng amnesty

    for all armed groups who renounce rebellion, including perpetrators of internaonal crimes. Some would

    argue that a transion of sorts is underway, in terms of eorts and policies aimed at ending the conict inthe north and shiing relaons between the Museveni administraon and rebel forces, parcularly the

    Lords Resistance Army (LRA), and the severely marginalised communies of northern Uganda from where

    the majority of its members are drawn. Yet, a complete transion process could not be implemented yet

    since the conict in the northern part of the country is connuing.6 This already precarious situaon

    is further complicated by the Internaonal Criminal Courts involvement in northern Uganda, which in

    turn has sparked a heightened debate regarding the appropriate sequencing of peace and jusce, and

    renewed interest in domesc soluons to naonal problems, including the use of tradional jusce

    processes in addressing human rights abuses.

    1 See Commission of Inquiry into the Disappearances of Persons in Uganda Since 25th January, 1971 (operated from 1st July 1974 to

    2nd January 1975) under the Chairmanship of Mr. Justice Mohammed Saeid. For additional information, refer also to Estates of Miss-

    ing Persons (Management) Decree, 1973 (Decree NO.20 of 1973)

    2 Refer to Legal Notice No. 5 of 1986 made under the Commission of Inquiry Act, Cap 56 of the Laws of Uganda, establishing a Com-mission of Inquiry into Violations of Human Rights in Uganda from the time of Independence on the 9 th of October 1962 to the time

    of takeover by the National Resistance Movement (NRM) Government on 26th January 1986. The full report of the commission can

    be accessed at www.beyondjuba.org

    3 Refer to Agreement on Comprehensive Solutions Between the Government of the Republic of Uganda and Lords Resistance Army/

    Movement, Juba May 2,2007

    4 Refer to the Agreement on Accountability and Reconciliation between the Government of the Republic of Uganda and the Lords

    Resistance Army/Movement, Juba, 2007.

    5 For a detailed discussion of the nature of Ugandas transition please see Okello, Moses C. Amnesty, Conict and International Law:

    the Compatibility of Ugandas Amnesty Law with International Standards for the Protection of International Rights, MA Disserta-

    tion, American University, Cairo, 2004.6 While many Ugandans continue to mistakenly conceptualise the north as being the only part of the country in need of transitionaljustice, and there is a corresponding inability to recognize the many different conicts that have plagued the country since independ-

    ence, and that have remained unacknowledged to date, the mechanisms currently being contemplated by the Government are national

    in scope.

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    11/48

    Beyond Juba2

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    The government has charged its Jusce Law and Order Sector (JLOS) with designing a ng transional

    jusce policy for the country. In line with that, a JLOS forum organised in mid 2008 raised several

    quesons regarding the types of transional jusce pracces that need claricaon, relaons between

    formal and informal accountability mechanisms, and whether or not the laer should undergo integraon

    into naonal jusce structures or be implemented at a local level.7 Indeed, JLOS has demonstrated its

    commitment to this imperave by coordinang the eorts to establishing a War Crimes Court to try

    persons alleged to have commied internaonal crimes in the course of the conict. In the most recentnaonal budget, the government has commied at least UGX 10.7 billion (approximately, US $5,000,000)

    for the recruitment of judges and facilitang other related logiscal issues,8 yet the process of adapng

    and integrang the proposed transional jusce mechanisms remains daunng.

    Unfortunately the burgeoning transional jusce process suered a signicant setback in April 2008 when

    the LRA leader, Joseph Kony, failed to sign a nal peace agreement and retreated with his forces deep

    into the Democrac Republic of Congo (DRC), thereby shiing the polical dynamics of the conict. What

    followed was a transnaonal military adventure by the governments of Uganda, DRC and Sudan. This was

    with support from the American military, and aimed at eradicang the LRA force within the DRC.9 To date,

    their combined eorts have failed to eliminate Joseph Kony and the LRA, contribung, in the minds of allUgandans, to an uncertain humanitarian situaon, including further massive aacks against civilians in

    the Congo and elsewhere in the region.10 This concern is parcularly felt by Ugandan Internally Displaced

    Persons (IDPs) who recall prior lulls in the ghng that were followed by brutal aacks. Irrespecve of

    these setbacks, the need for a comprehensive transional jusce process in Uganda connues. Among

    other things, this process should acknowledge the cyclical nature of conict in Uganda--parcularly the

    north-south11 divide--as a factor in the most recent round of polical violence, a concern reected in

    Agenda Item Number 2.

    From a policy perspecve, the complexies of Ugandas present situaon, while fraught with uncertaines,

    also present excing opportunies for breaking new ground in current understandings of transional

    jusce and its role in addressing complex conicts, parcularly within Africa. The meaning of transion,

    itself is part of an evolving debate within the eld of transional jusce and what Uganda does with

    respect to tradional pracces and its emphasis on retribuve and restorave pracces could inform

    transional jusce pracces elsewhere in Africa.

    This paper aims to complement JLOS on-going transional jusce work. It considers how local tradional

    jusce perspecves may be injected into the on-going debate on naonal transional jusce mechanisms.

    Specically, it examines the mulple legacies le by the interlocking conicts that have plagued the

    Acholi, Lango and Teso sub-regions since independence, and makes some recommendaons for including

    principles of tradional jusce into the countrys formal law system.

    There is evidence that tradional pracces connue to enjoy a degree of grassroots support and correspond

    to local noons of jusce. However, it remains unclear to what extent these pracces could address

    abuses perpetrated in the course of conict; how (if at all) they could be adapted for contemporary

    applicaon; whether or not formal codicaon of tradional principles into naonal law is desirable, and

    to what extent such pracces must be allowed to remain exible. Ulmately, the eecve integraon

    of tradional jusce principles could make an important contribuon to the Juba Peace Agreement;

    7 Minutes of the Third National Justice Law and Order Sector Forum held July 30-31, 2008 (on le with the Beyond Juba Project)

    8 Republic of Uganda, Enhancing Strategic Interventions to improve Business Climate and Revitalize Production to achieve Prosperity

    for All, The Budget Speech, Financial Year 2009/2010. Delivered at the Meeting of the Fourth Session of the 8th Parliament of Uganda,

    11 June, 2009 by Hon. Syda N. M., Bbumba (MP), Minister of Finance, Planning and Economic Development.

    9 This effort was backed by the US government which sent 17 military advisors to assist the UPDF in its planning efforts and furthersubsidized the operation with one million dollars worth of fuel and satellite phones.10 Ibid

    11 Socioeconomic divisions between the north and south contribute to the perpetuation of violence in Uganda, further engendering fears

    of domination by one or more regions and ethnic groups, and putting up barriers to national unity and reconciliation.

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    12/48

    Beyond Juba 3

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    Clause 2.4 of Agenda Item 3 suggests that the, widest naonal ownership of the accountability and

    reconciliaon process.12

    This policy debate is part of a broader narrave currently underway as the country struggles to confront

    its history of conicts and moves towards a shared naonal identy. While the role that tradional

    jusce pracces will play in the transional jusce process and in potenally broader legal reforms has

    been widely researched and discussed within both academic and policy circles,13

    there is no consensuson how it should look and work in Uganda. The debate about how to operaonalise tradional pracces

    from dierent regions aected by war, as well as, how to integrate their relaons with one another

    will be one of the major challenges in making tradional jusce relevant to the transional period. An

    equally important discussion will surround how what is done in the transional phase will compliment

    and hopefully beer compliment the formal jusce system.

    This paper is divided into four secons. The rst is the introducon. The second secon idenes ve

    fundamental principles underlying the tradional jusce pracces across the three sub-regions, as well

    as, highlighng some variaon in their regional interpretaon. A third secon discusses the status and

    relevance of tradional jusce pracces today including the role of tradional clan leaders and therelaonship between formal jusce and tradional jusce. A fourth secon highlights some issues that

    emerge within current pracce, including the role of women and youth in the various processes. Finally,

    the paper considers how tradional jusce could be operaonalised for the purposes of a naonal

    transional jusce process and what challenges are likely to emerge in the course of such an exercise.

    1.1 Methodology

    The paper is based on research conducted between February 3rd-18 th 2008 in the Acholi and Lango

    regions, August 10th-28th in the Teso region, September 10th-27th in the Acholi region, and November 20th-

    29th in the Lango region. A workshop outlining the progress of the research was conducted on 10th July

    2009 in Kampala. Researchers used qualitave techniques, employing interview maps as a tool to guide

    conversaons with respondents. A total of 171 interviews and 34 focus group discussions were recorded

    throughout the districts of Amuria, Katakwi, Kumi, Pallisa and Soro in the Teso sub-region, the districts

    of Gulu, Amuru, Pader and Kitgum in the Acholi sub-region, and in Lira district in the Lango sub-region.

    Interviews of key people were conducted with cultural leaders, community elders, government ocials

    (local councillors, members of the Jusce Law and Order Sector, regional and district police ocers, and

    district magistrates), as well as, public defenders, humanitarian and other workers from various NGOs.

    Focus group discussions were also held with other cizens found in villages, towns and IDP camps.

    The paper also incorporates key comments made during a presentaon of its major ndings at the

    Imperial Royale Hotel on July 10, 2009. One important limitaon to the paper which was pointed out at

    that event was that, while it seeks to address the importance of tradion in transion for the country as

    a whole, it is only able to draw on case studies from the northern areas of the country, and would benetby being enriched with further case studies.

    1.2 Background: The Legacy of Conicts

    Crical to any understanding of the role that tradional jusce pracces might play in a transional jusce

    process is a comprehension of the conicts legacies that communies feel requires redress. Uganda as

    a whole, and parcularly the north, lived through a cyclical history of conicts related to naonal regime

    changes and local rebel movements arising in response. The roots of Ugandas conicts lie, in part, within

    ethnic cleavages aggravated by the Brish colonial regime, which intenonally set dierent ethnic groups

    against each other and supercially divided the country into a North and a South. As a result, the

    people of Uganda have, in the post-colonial era, experienced a variety of conicts stemming partly fromthe consequences of colonisaon and state formaon, as well as, histories arising from ethnic tensions.

    12 Juba Peace Agreement, Agenda Item 3 (2007): Agreement on Accountability and Reconciliation, clause 2.4.

    13 Ibid

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    13/48

    Beyond Juba4

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    These conicts included tensions around the Bunyoro lost counes, the constuonal crises of 1965-

    66, the war in Toro/Kasese, the war in Teso district under the Uganda Peoples Army (UPA), the war in

    the west of the country organised by the Allied Defence Forces (ADF) straddling the border into eastern

    Democrac Republic of Congo, and the war in the Luwero Triangle.

    The northern Ugandan conict, lasng now for over 22 years, remains the longest insurgency on the

    African connent, one which various peace processes aempted with lile success to resolve. It

    has increasingly come to be seen as not only a local concern but a naonal and internaonal one that

    aected the countries of southern Sudan, eastern DRC, and the Central African Republic (CAR). The

    latest peace process the talks held in Juba from July 2006 onwards saw itself mired in controversy

    as the LRA demanded that the Internaonal Criminal Court (ICC) li indictments issued against their top

    commanders as a precondion for signing the Final Peace Agreement. Although some believe the ICC

    indictments were only an excuse to disavow the peace process, the ICCs indictments raise fundamental

    quesons on maers relang to the achievement of jusce in Uganda today, and centre current debates

    on the northern conict around whether the Final Peace Agreement needs signing, and how, if at all, the

    new wave of military acons will resolve the conict.

    This history of conicts and failed peace agreements has le a mulplicity of legacies that are far fromuniform in Uganda, and even vary between the Acholi, Lango, and Teso sub-regions in the North. What

    they all have in common, however, is a trail of human rights violaons that remain unacknowledged in

    any comprehensive way. At the core of these legacies lies a complicated and muldimensional set of

    resentments, all of which need some redress if full reconciliaon is to be achieved.

    In Teso, the Uganda Peoples Army (UPA) rebellion, Karimojong cale raids, and the LRA conict le a

    legacy of resentment towards the Museveni government, the Karimojong, and the Acholi people. The

    longest running episodes of violence remain with the Karimojong, who consistently conduct cale raids

    in the region. But the rebellion of UPA (1986 to 1992) and the LRA incursion in 2003 have also contributed

    to the devastaon in the region.

    Aer the fall of Idi Amin in 1979, a group of Karimojong raided the arms store of Moroto Barracks.

    This event is widely seen as a key marker in the transion from the use of tradional weaponry to the

    current predominance of small arms and a corresponding aggravaon in levels and types of violence,

    which in turn prompted numerous military intervenons in the name of disarmament. This militarizaon

    resulted in intractable violence and internal displacement within both Karamoja and Teso, accompanied

    by a loss of property, psycho-social insecurity, and an ongoing humanitarian crisis. The Karimojong issue

    was not only long standing but also highly relevant in the region. To ignore the need for reconciliaon

    between the Karamojong and neighbouring Teso communies would disregard one of the most pressing

    challenges to peace in the region.

    In addion to armed cale raids by the Karimojong, the UPA rebellion against the then new NRA government

    (a response to perceived or real marginalisaon of the region) also had detrimental consequences for the

    Teso people. The rebellion was rooted in both a fear of retribuon for the role that many from the Teso

    region played in ghng against Museveni in Luwero, and a belief that the new Museveni government

    was not suciently protecng the region from the Karimojong.14 As one respondent recounted, the

    conict resulted in, a law and order breakdown with criminal elements leaders of the rebellion stole

    and took peoples cale to feed the combatants.15 This, along with abuses and perhaps even addional

    cale the by the Museveni government forces, contributed to the depleon of the regions resources.16

    The LRA incursion into Teso and Karamoja, which began in June of 2003, was only the most recent conict

    to a long history of violence.

    The prolonged insecurity has le a complicated legacy in Teso, involving a trail of human rights violaons,which remain unacknowledged in any comprehensive fashion. Rather than develop a policy to deal with14 Interview with Church Leader Soroti 17/08/08

    15 Interview with an Elder Pallisa.

    16 Interview with an Elder Pallisa Town 14/08/08

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    14/48

    Beyond Juba 5

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    this legacy and the associated governance decits, the Ugandan government brought an end to the overt

    violence by negoang with and co-opng key members of the UPA in 1992. The negave peace that was

    achieved le no place for the voices of vicms, and no proper process of accountability, reconciliaon,

    and reparaons with which to achieve closure. Parts of the populaon therefore remain deeply bier

    over the abuses they suered during the UPA rebellion, and peace in Teso is correspondingly more fragile

    than is generally acknowledged. Indicators of this fragility include the reluctance of some secons of the

    populaon to cooperate with the on-going disarmament process,17

    the incomplete demobilisaon andreintegraon of the UPA combatants, and the swiness with which the Arrow Boys milia was mobilised

    in response to the LRA incursion in 2003. Furthermore, the LRA incursion has le residual tensions

    between Teso and Acholi. The Acholi people in Teso were oen idened with the LRA, and responsibility

    for the LRA incursion is frequently projected onto the Acholi as a whole. Because the Karimojong conict

    is sll ongoing, Teso communies on the border live in a state of constant insecurity. 18

    The legacies of conict were slightly dierent in Lango than they were in Teso. There was less overt

    bierness toward the Museveni government; however, there was a striking resentment toward Amin

    and the damage his regime inicted on the region. One respondent from the Lango region arculated

    this senment in his descripon of the Amin period, explaining that under Amin, things changed.Corrupon got stronger, Amins soldiers would stop to arrest you, then say you can get o if you pay

    them. No commodies like salt were available under Amins me.19 The respondent later referenced

    Amin specically when describing problems such as sexual oences, recounng that even during [his]

    me, [he] hadnt heard of much adultery taking place, but it increased during Amins me, and that he

    used to receive cases of domesc violence [at the hospital] because the Army was everywhere. 20 Yet

    again, the same respondent who had worked in a hospital explained there were Bangladeshis selling

    drugs from the hospital, and when I complained, I was targeted for arrest, but managed to escape.21

    Such negave accounts of the period of Amins rule were common among respondents who had lived

    through that me, and several individuals recounted stories in which they evaded arrest by self exile

    during the period.22 Thus, the narraves from the region tend to pin greater responsibility for trouble in

    the region on Amins rule than on the current Museveni government.

    In addion, there was a lingering bierness in Lango toward the Acholi as a result of the LRA conict. While

    many respondents believed that the two tribes now lived like brothers, others admied a resentment

    that persisted below the surface.23 In the course of the research, disagreements were common; focus

    group discussions and exchanges at mes became heated over the queson of whether or not tensions

    persisted. One respondent put it simply, explaining that Langi might feel that against Acholi because

    Kony was Acholi.24 Another respondent shared his belief that the conict brought a lot of tension

    between Langi and Acholi. The war was started by Acholi, but I am ready to forgive, but only if the elders

    come and apologise.25 Reecng on the previous talks between the Lango and Acholi cultural leaders,

    he explained that more dialogue with a greater degree of transparency was needed because while theinstuons have met... we have never goen any clear feedback. They didnt even consult us or our

    clan leaders and they should have.26 Another respondent from a rural trading centre and former IDP

    camp argued that the Acholi should be held accountable because Kony is their son.27 Whether fair or

    17 Joseph Malinga, UPDF recovers 57 guns in Teso The Daily Monitor, 26 November 2008. pg 7. This article quotes an army spokesman

    saying that some residents are adamant in refusing to respond to the disarmament process.

    18 The previous two paragraphs draw on Brieng Note No. 1 (2008): Conict, Justice and Reconciliation in Teso: Obstacles and Op-portunities.

    19 Interview with an Elde Lira 09/11/08

    20 Interview with an Elder Lira Town 09/11/08

    21 Interview with an Elder Lira Town 09/11/08

    22 Interview with an Elder Lira Town 09/11/08

    23 Focus Group Discussion with 7 women, Aleb-Tong Parish Lira 11/11/0824 Interview with woman Lira Town 09/11/0825 Focus Group Discussion with 7 women Aleb-Tong Parish, Lira 12/11/08

    26 Focus Group Discussion with 4 women Aleb-Tong Parish Lira 1211/08

    27 Focus Group Discussion with 15 people, Ogur Sub-County, Dokolo 13/11/08

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    15/48

    Beyond Juba6

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    jused, the belief that the Acholi people were somewhat responsible for the acons of Kony speaks to a

    sense of collecve responsibility with deep roots in the regions cultures and tradional jusce systems.

    One shop owner from Lira town described a period during the conict when Acholis who resided in Lira

    town were forced to go into hiding to avoid mob jusce, as Lango residents vowed to kill any Acholis they

    found in town.28 It is important to note that these tensions were the result of events beyond the LRA

    incursion into the region. The scale of the tension that lay just below the surface of supposed peace, and

    the long running roots of this tension, both indicate that reconciling the two ethnic groups will require aprocess that is more than supercial.

    In the Acholi region, the legacy of conict pertained almost exclusively to the conict between the

    Museveni government and the LRA, with both pares provoking similar levels of resentment. A common

    refrain was that the UPDF forces had commied as many abuses as the LRA. One young man from an

    IDP camp believed that the government [had] killed a lot of people. They have raped so many ladies,

    removed peoples property. Out of people that died in this war, half were killed by government, half by

    LRA. Burning homes, loong peoples properes, this was done mostly by the government.29 Another

    respondent described her feelings regarding the parity of wrong-doing.

    I dont see why I should forgive Kony, when I am a vicm on both sides. My brother and

    his son were both killed, my brother by the LRA and his son was taken and burnt by the

    UPDF. My own sisters son was taken. The sister and husband followed the following day.

    They were digging a pit latrine. He heard their voices and they went to talk to him and

    they were chased and they were going to be killed. That boy dug his own grave and they

    were killed and buried there... So who should I forgive and who should I not forgive?30

    In addion there is a sense that the original intenons of the rebel movement had been rightly founded

    on a percepon of marginalisaon of the region by the Museveni government. Moreover, abuses by the

    new NRM government against suspected rebel forces in Acholiland contributed to the growing support

    for rebel movements. As Sverker Finnstrm noted, soon aer the Museveni and NRM/A takeover,

    killings, rape and other forms of physical abuse aimed at non-combatants became the order of the day in

    Acholiland, which was foreign territory to the NRM/A soldiers.31 In addion, cale loongs were rampant,

    and Finnstrm explains that while others did not explicitly support the uprising... [they] claimed that

    they saw no other way of surviving than to join the insurgency groups in one way or another.32 As one

    young man put it, partly the Government and partly the rebels are responsible for the war... why would

    they go to the bush if the Government wasnt doing bad things? The LRA are partly to blame, but partly

    they were defending the people of the North.33 One respondent went so far as to explain the LRAs

    acons as an imitaon of Museveni himself. He explained that Kony was trying to imitate power like

    Museveni, just jumps into the bush to get the State House.34 Kony was also viewed as highly responsible,

    parcularly because his acons were not sanconed by the elders.35 The sanconing of the insurgency,however, remains contested in some quarters. This was also important because it indicated that elders

    could not bring an end to the conict by calling the LRA out of the bush. As a result of these percepons

    both the Museveni Government and the LRA were seen as equally responsible for the conict and the

    devastaon which it produced. This noon of parity between the abuses commied by the government

    and those commied by the LRA has vital implicaons for any reconciliaon process which would have

    to include the vicms along with both LRA and Ugandan government perpetrators.

    28 Focus Group Discussion with 6 men in Lira Town 15/11/08.

    29 Interview with an Elder Koch-Ongako Sub-County, Gulu 18/09/08

    30 Interview with an opinion leader, Gulu Town 17/09/08

    31 Finnstrm, Sverker 2006, wars of the past and War in the present: The Lorsd Resistance Army/Movement,(Africa Journal of the

    International African Institute) Volume 7632 Ibid33 Interview with a man Amuru Township 20/09/08

    34 Interview with a woman Gulu Municipality 22/09/08

    35 Interview with Human rights Acvtivist Gulu Town 22/09/08

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    16/48

    Beyond Juba 7

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    Many Acholis also recognised the bierness that Teso and Lango communies felt toward them, and how

    other communies might nd it dicult to separate the acons of the LRA from those of the Acholi as a

    people. Some respondents felt that this resentment was unfair because, as one respondent put it, when

    [the LRA] went [to Teso,] it was to ght the government, not to ght with the tribe of Teso. The government

    recruited people of Teso to join the forces.36 Nonetheless, Acholi cultural leaders had reached out and

    sent leers to surrounding regions to pursue meengs that could bring about reconciliaon. While leersthat were sent to both the Lango and Bunyoro led to producve meengs, which enabled the discussion

    of a range of issues from interethnic marriages to the reality of killings within families, the Teso did not

    respond to calls for dialogue, and instead emphasised military soluons, connuing to sll [hold] their

    ground that the Acholi had sent LRA to Teso.37 Despite these connuing challenges, the mere awareness

    on the part of the Acholi people and noted early aempts at reconciliaon between the ethnic groups

    remains a posive sign that raises the possibility of further eorts toward reconciliaon.

    The Acholi, Lango and Teso regions exemplify the legacies of unacknowledged conict and human rights

    violaons which have in the pastand may again in the futureproduce cyclical paerns of violence.

    These unaddressed legacies leave open the potenal for future violence and unrest throughout theregion and foster an environment rich in daily civil and criminal disputes. The violent atmosphere is

    fed by the remaining stockpile of weapons in some places like Teso, and haphazard demobilisaon and

    demilitarisaon processes across the region. One respondent from JLOS in Soro town arculated the

    linkage between the history of violent conict and contemporary criminal acvity, explaining that, all

    of these conicts led to displacement, and thus increases in poverty, which in turn led to an increase

    in delement, delinquency by children, adultery by wives, the breaking up of families, and land

    wrangles.38

    These legacies in parcular are the result of a post-conict environment in which eorts to address

    accountability, reconciliaon, reparaons and even the legimacy of the current government have been

    sorely wanng. The mulplicity of these diering legacies of conict and their corresponding resentments

    in the three regions indicate just how complex a comprehensive naonal reconciliaon process would

    have to be if eecvely constructed. It would be insucient to limit the scope of the transional jusce

    process to the abuses commied in the conict between the Ugandan Government and the LRA. A

    limited process would not begin to address the residual tensions between the districts or between them

    and the Museveni government. At present Ugandas legal regime emphasises formal jusce mechanisms

    directly derived from the Brish colonial common law model. Given the complex history of Uganda, its

    mulple legacies of violence, and the manifest incapacity of the exisng legal system to address these

    legacies, there is a compelling need to explore opportunies for a comprehensive legal framework that

    can address and reect peoples sense of jusce in Uganda. The countrys rich and numerous cultural

    heritages provide a number of entry points

    1. 3 Policy Context

    This secon speaks to the policy debate that has emerged since peace talks between the Ugandan

    government and LRA began in July 2006; a debate in which it is assumed that tradional jusce pracces

    should play a role in accounng for violaons commied in the course of the conict. Thus far, the

    ve items signed in Juba aim to address the LRA conict in northern Uganda. 39 Agenda Item No. 3 and

    the Annexure propose a framework for accountability and reconciliaon that carves out a potenally

    36 Interview with an Elder Gulu Town 16/09/08

    37 Interview with a woman Gulu Town 22/09/08

    38 Interview with a Judicial ofcial Soroti Town 28/08/0839 Juba Peace Agreement, Agenda Item 1 (2006): Agreement on Cessation of Hostilities, Agenda Item 2 (2007): Agreement on Com-prehensive Solutions, Agenda Item 3 (2007): Agreement on Accountability and Reconciliation, Agenda Item 4 (2008): Agreement

    on a Permanent Ceasere, Agenda Item 5 (2008): Agreement on Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, Agenda Item 6

    (2008): Agreement on Implementation and Monitoring Mechanisms.

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    17/48

    Beyond Juba8

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    vital role for tradional jusce pracces. Clause 3.1 of the Agenda Item states that, tradional jusce

    mechanisms such as Culo Kwor, mato oput, kayo cuk, ailuc,Tonu ci Koka and others as pracced in the

    communies aected by the conict shall be promoted, with necessary modicaons, as a central part of

    the framework for accountability and reconciliaon. In addion to Agenda Item 3, The Peace, Recovery,

    and Development Plans (PRDP) Strategic Objecve 4 states:

    Peace Building and Reconciliaon broadly proposes a place for tradional juscepracces, calling for a focus on building informal leadership among men and women to

    engage with local authories and civilians in the reconciliaon process through localized

    conict management mechanisms.40

    The call for an appraisal of tradional jusce may in part relate to the limited responsiveness of exisng

    naonal and internaonal formal jusce mechanisms in addressing Ugandas numerous legacies of

    conict, and to the way in which the broader colonial legacy of Ugandan law alienates much of the

    country from the exisng jusce system.41

    Although both Juba and the PRDP acknowledge that tradional jusce pracces have a role to play, the

    nuances of their operaon and applicability remain unclear. Moreover, the ability of these mechanisms

    to address injusces commied in the course of decades of violence is increasingly challenged by the

    conicts own state of ux. These issues are heatedly debated in JLOS, tasked as it is with the responsibility

    to design a ng transional jusce policy for the country.

    Although these policy documents acknowledge that tradional jusce pracces have a role to play, the

    ability of these mechanisms to address injusces arising from the conict are unknown These issues are

    heatedly debated in JLOS tasked as it is with the responsibility to design a ng transional jusce policy

    for the country. In JLOSs 2009 annual forum, several quesons were raised as they regard the types of

    transional jusce pracces that need claricaon, relaons between formal and informal accountability

    mechanisms, and whether or not the laer should undergo integraon into naonal jusce structures

    or implementaon at a local level.42 The discussion focused on which abuses tradional jusce praccescould address, the extent to which (if at all) they could be adapted for contemporary applicaon, whether

    or not formal codicaon of tradional principles into naonal law is desirable, and to which extent they

    must be allowed exible implementaon at the local level.

    This policy debate is part of a broader narrave currently being charted in Uganda as the country struggles

    to confront a history of conicts and moves toward naonal reconciliaon. While the whole enterprise of

    tradional pracces in addressing modern injusces may go unresolved, there is evidence that tradion

    sll enjoys a degree of local applicaon in areas aected by conict and that the values and principles

    embodied in these pracces have a future role to play in naonal transional jusce mechanisms.

    This said, the manner in which draers framed Agenda Item 3 limits their scope and presupposes thatancipated policy shis will box in conict aected areas, despite the fact that the eecve integraon

    of tradional jusce principles could make an important contribuon to what Clause 2.4 of Agenda Item

    3 suggests should be the widest naonal ownership of the accountability and reconciliaon process.43

    2. A Jurisprudence of Tradional Jusce

    The tradional jusce pracces from the Acholi, Lango and Teso vary considerably. For all, ve fundamental

    principles seem to be at the centre of each of them. These were material compensaon, reconciliaon

    and forgiveness, truth-telling and responsibility, cleansing and welcoming, and punishment. While the

    relaonship between abuses that arose from wars and related conicts from those that do not remains

    40 Peace Recovery and Development Plan (PRDP) (2007): Strategic Objective 4: Peace Building and Reconciliation, Article 4.4.1:Public Information, Education and Communication (IEC) and Counselling Program.

    41 This and the following paragraph draws on Brieng Note No. 1 (2008): Conict, Justice and Reconciliation in Teso: Obstacles and

    Opportunities.

    42 Minutes of the Third National Justice Law and Order Sector Forum held July 30-31, 2008 ( on le with the Beyond Juba Project43 Juba Peace Agreement, Agenda Item 3 (2007): Agreement on Accountability and Reconciliation, clause 2.4.

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    18/48

    Beyond Juba 9

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    unclear, the overall tradional jusce principles are similar in both situaons and express the values of

    each of these groups.44

    The principles found expression in a sequence of pracces which are designed to result in reconciliaon

    between the pares and their clans. The process normally begins with one of two principles. If the

    individual who commied the abuse had been absent from the community for an extended period of

    me, it begins with a welcoming or cleansing ceremony. Otherwise, the rst step is to idenfy theresponsible party and learn the damage caused. The next step would begin with retribuve acon such

    as caning. Truth-telling in the form of a dialogue to discuss the events and to ask the oending party to

    accept responsibility would follow. This dialogue would help establish the reparaons due the vicm.

    Finally, an act which expressed reconciliaon and forgiveness would take place.

    All ve of these fundamental elements concerning tradional jusce must be understood in the context

    of a common overarching principle of collecve or community responsibility. This was most commonly

    expressed at the clan level, where any crime commied by an individual was as much the responsibility

    of that enre clan as it was that of the individual. The clan as a collecve structure would be obligated to

    express responsibility for the crime before the oended clan. Everyone who is a member of the oendersclan, regardless of his or her nancial status would be required to contribute to any material compensaon

    paid to the oended clan. The implicaon of this principle of collecve responsibility was a behavioural

    modicaon process within each clan that used social pressure to discourage misbehaviour.

    There were signicant dierences as to how each ethnic group applied these tradional jusce pracces.45

    Generally, rural and camp populaons knew more about tradional pracces than town and urban

    populaons, excepng NGO advocates and the cultural leadership within towns. Rural populaons had

    a stronger link to cultural pracces overall, including those specically pertaining to jusce. The reasons

    are not enrely clear, but two factors are likely to have been relevant. First, there is less access to formal

    jusce in rural areas leading those cizens to turn to tradional jusce as a more immediate response

    to abuses. The second reason was likely related to the forces of modernizaon, stronger within town

    centres than in rural areas. Changes in educaon and income earning were dierent within towns and

    they may have contributed to the erosion of cultural structures and values in these areas. Thus, while

    the ve principle elements of tradional jusce were expressed by nearly all respondents, they found

    themselves less well arculated by town populaons than those from rural areas.

    2.1 Cleansing, Cooling and Welcoming

    Cleansing pracces were an important element of tradional pracces throughout the Acholi, Lango, and

    Teso regions. They were most commonly pracced as part of a process of welcoming, but also remained

    integral to response mechanisms for a killing or other act properly understood in the community as an

    abominaon. Cleansing also funconed as part of a nal reconciliaon process to normalise relaonsbetween an oended and oending party. The noon of cleansing was far more prominent in the Acholi

    region than it was in either Lango or Teso.

    Cleansing was most prominently connected with welcoming pracces for individuals who had been

    absent from a community for a prolonged period of me. In the past this absence could have existed for

    any number of reasons, but was oen linked to some quarrel with the community before leaving. Today

    the procedure refers to the return of ex-combatants, or the return of someone who had spent me in

    prison, as well as, any situaon in which a person might have simply travelled abroad, or spent a long

    me away from a community. Regardless of the reasons for a persons absence, there was unanimous

    agreement that there needed to be a cleansing upon their return to the community in order for them to

    be fully welcomed. Acholis used it most oen, Lango less so with Teso communies the least likely toemploy them. Acholi and Lango communies referred to a pracce known as stepping on the egg as

    44 See section on Traditional Justice and the Challenges o Mass Confict.

    45 See following sections for the variations between districts

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    19/48

    Beyond Juba10

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    the primary mechanism for such a cleansing welcome, with some accounts of the sprinkling of water on

    the returnee, while in Teso the sprinkling of water was the only pracce menoned.

    The theme of cleansing was not restricted to inial welcoming pracces. Cleansing ceremonies also

    remained integral to major reconciliaon pracces in the three regions. Community members oen

    expressed cleansing as part of the reconciliaon process in the slaughtering of a bull, sheep or goat. In

    Teso, a bull was slaughtered at the nal stage of reconciliaon, and in Acholiland, sheep, or at mes goats,were slaughtered as part of the reconciliaon pracce for a murder. A Lango woman explained that the

    slaughtering of an animal, as part of reconciliaon, was important since, it is to symbolise a cleansing

    process, otherwise things might keep coming back to haunt them.46 Another woman elaborated saying

    that the, person would be haunted [if they speared someone to death], but if an animal is killed then

    it washes away the memory.47 In order for reconciliaon to happen, cleansing was also necessary. The

    two noons could not be easily extricated from one another. Thus, cleansings were necessary at both the

    beginning and conclusion of the tradional jusce and reconciliaon process. They were part of an inial

    preparaon as well as a symbol of the conclusion, a sign of the ulmate agreement or reconciliaon, and

    an indicaon that the two clans had put the past behind them. Cleansing as a principle was, in essence,

    used to bookend the jusce process.

    Peoples percepons of the purpose of cleansings embraced several forms. First and foremost, cleansing

    was intended to rid a person of any bad things - spiritual or otherwise - which may have accumulated

    during their absence. As one Acholi elder explained in the context of returning ex-combatants, when

    they were abducted, they did not say a word, and were clean like an egg, then they were deled so that

    they were no longer clean. The (pobo) reed is the tradional soap for washing, so it is used to cleanse the

    returnees when they are received back into communies.48 As one mass stepping-on-the-egg pracce

    for returning ex-combatants commenced in Gulu, the elder performing the pracce explained that, this

    is for welcoming our sons home. A clan egg before you will step on, it is clean inside and out, this branch

    is from apobo tree, it is slippery, it will clean you of any short-comings while you were away.49 There was

    a sense that a person may need to be rid of a burden both emoonally and mentally. A man from outside

    Kitgum explained that, tradionally [you are] not mentally proper unl you step [on the egg].50

    A young returned ex-combatant from Gulu district felt that it was important for him to perform the

    pracce because, it removes something from the heart. If you step on that egg, it means that those things

    remain there, and the water, that means to wash your heart, not to think of those things. 51 Parcularly

    in Acholi, there was a spiritual element to such cleansings, where bad spirits responsible for haunng

    a person, either because of things they have done or places they might have gone, would be cleansed

    away. However, some did not feel that this spiritual aspect was appropriate. A youth from Amuru district

    believed that he did not feel he needed to do the cleansing upon his return because he did not believe

    there were any spirits that could harm him, though he did support the use of some tradional pracces.52There was also a preventave aspect to the cleansing as a woman from outside of Kitgum explained that,

    the reason for stepping on an egg is that under Acholi, when someone stays a lot of years outside, that

    thing is used so that any other types of diseases do not happen again.53

    Cleansing was also closely associated with the idea of cooling ones temper aer becoming hot or

    disturbed. As an elder respondent associated with the Iteso Cultural Union explained, if [you] went away

    aer [a] ght with [your] family, but had not killed, before entering the house, you would nd a calabash,

    sprinkle water with grass, somemes [the family would] wave a cock around [the] returnee saying the

    46 Focus Group Discussion with 7 people Aleb-Tong parish, Lira Town 12/11/08

    47 Focus Group Discussion with 10 women, Aleb-Tong, Lira Town 12/1108

    48 Interview with woman Gulu Town 16/09/0849 Acholi traditional cleansing ceremony Gulu Town,23/09/08

    50 Focus Group Discussion with 4 people, Lemule, Amuru Township 25/09/08

    51 Interview with a man, Koch Ongako Sub-County, Gulu 18/09/08

    52 Interview with a man, Alero Sub-County, Amuru Township, 20/09/08

    53 Focus Group Discussion with 5 people, Lemule parish, Amuru Township, 25/09/08

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    20/48

    Beyond Juba 11

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    words oliwi moucit (let your body be cool) and wishing them health and peace of mind. 54 An elder

    from Acholi also linked the cooling to the use of water in some of the cleansing and welcoming pracces,

    nong that, cold water symbolises the cool heart that this person should have.55 The noon of cooling

    was derived from the need to cool the body when someone is sick and runs a fever. In parcular this

    pertained to the slaughter of sheep, which were thought to have cool blood because of their mild nature,

    though this parcular associaon with sheep was specic to the Acholi region. A similar senment was

    expressed by an Acholi man in his explanaon for why a sheep, and not a goat, was used for certaincrimes, for, a sheep has colder blood than goats, he explained. Goats have warm blood...things from

    re [need] sheep, like food from re [needs] sheep. A goat is [needed] when you shut your wife outside

    or when you are caught with a lady in the bush.56 Thus, the cleansing is an act of balance. That which

    creates heat requires cooling to reset the equilibrium. The connecon between cooling and cleansing

    was common across the three regions, and remains indicave of what would need to take place for

    communies to fully heal from the legacies of conicts they have suered.

    Cleansing and cooling were also important in restoring balance, both mentally and emoonally, and served

    as a necessary preparatory step in readying both individuals and the community for a further process of

    reconciliaon. Without such a step, it is likely that tempers could remain high, or that perpetrators of an

    abuse might remain agitated, and any further steps of truth-telling through dialogue and reconciliaon

    would be in vein, and could even lead to socially explosive incidents and eventually further conict. If

    transional jusce is to lead to sustainable peace in Uganda, a naonal process would need to create

    space for such preparatory steps so that communies feel ready to parcipate in the truth-telling and

    reconciliatory acvies which would follow.

    Finally, there was an aspect to the cleansing framed as welcoming individuals back into the community.

    One parcular indicaon of this purpose was expressed in the Acholi pracce of needing to step over the

    sck that is used to open the community granary, a symbol that the community is allowing you back to

    be fed by the granary that raised you.

    It is this aspect of cleansing that has the most pressing contemporary implicaons. The awareness

    that any prolonged absence, parcularly one related to a disagreement, could potenally lead to the

    marginalisaon of the individual upon return shows a foresight greatly needed in the contemporary

    project of building sustainable peace in Uganda. One of the leading factors seemingly responsible

    for the cyclical violence that plagued the country is the marginalisaon of regions that spawned rebel

    movements, even aer the conicts ceased. In order to break this cycle, it is necessary to bring these

    regions back into the naonal fold, welcoming them into the naonal community. Thus, some reecon

    of this principle of welcoming and cleansing should be part of the naonal transional jusce process to

    facilitate the restoraon of a naonal community.

    2.2 Punishment and Retribuve Aspects of Tradional Jusce

    Tradional jusce has retribuve aspects that have not been focused on by previous research. Earlier

    work focused on the reconciliaon component in tradional jusce pracces. It would be an error to

    enrely ignore the role of punishment in the pracce of tradional jusce. Caning was the most common

    form of punishment and was ubiquitous across the three regions. It is less commonly pracced today.

    Punishment, including caning, has been more common in Lango and Teso than in Acholiland.

    The retribuve aspects of tradional jusce were oen part of an inial community response to a given

    abuse, then followed by mechanisms that embody the jusce systems other elements. As a woman

    elder from Teso described: If [the elders] determined that so and so was the one that started the

    problem, that [he] was the cause of this dispute, he would be caned unl he apologises to the elders

    that he will never do it [again].57 Another respondent described a more specic situaon in which a boy

    54 Interview with Cultural Leaders Teso, Soroti Town, 10/08/0855 Interview with a woman Gulu Town, 22/09/08

    56 Interview with Human Rights expert, Gulu Town 22/09/08

    57 Interview with an Elderly woman Atutur Parish, Kyoga Sub-County, Kumi, 14/08/08

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    21/48

    Beyond Juba12

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    caught in the act of adultery would be caned unl his father arrived and agreed to pay compensaon to

    the womans husband or family. 58 In some instances, caning was parcularly relevant for misbehaving

    youth. Many elder respondents felt that the contemporary problems they faced with young people were

    exacerbated when caning became a less common method of punishment. Overall, caning and other

    forms of punishment are always part of a larger jusce process; indeed a prelude to other pracces

    aimed at resolving the situaon.

    The intended purpose of punishment was straighorward: deterrence. Importantly, punishment was

    a largely individualized element of tradional jusce, unlike the communal nature of much of its other

    elements. The individual who commied an oence would be caned, not the clan as a whole. Yet the

    limit on how severe caning could be was oen connected with community standards. Either elders would

    ocially declare the number of canes a person may receive, or if the caning was more spontaneous, the

    community reserved the right to intervene if it went too far. Public restraint balanced the public shaming

    aached to the beang.

    An important disncon is drawn between such types of restrained canings and incidents of mob jusce.59

    Several respondents felt that mob jusce was a modern phenomenon, fuelled by social instability anddire economic circumstances leading to harsh responses to acvies such as the.60 Nonetheless, there

    is reason for cauon regarding any contemporary re-emergence of corporal punishment as part of

    tradional jusce pracces. The line between restrained retribuve punishment and mob jusce was

    vague at best, and many respondents who spoke highly of the pracce of caning were elders who also

    voiced disregard for formal noons of human rights that pertained to women and youths. The important

    implicaon of these ndings is not that caning should be brought back as a pracce, but that there is

    a need to further explore the belief that a lack of social discipline, parcularly as it relates to youths, is

    parally responsible for social instability and the eagerness with which youths have been willing to take

    up arms against the government.

    While caning was the most commonly discussed form of retribuve jusce, other forms of punishment

    included the aacking of another clans homestead prior to a meeng to reconcile the two pares61, as

    well as, a pracce recounted in Lango for cases of incest, in which the man would be instructed to urinate

    on the woman. The intended purpose of the incest punishment was not to cleanse the individuals, but

    rather to deter them from repeang the behaviour.

    Imprisonment a concept not fundamentally rooted in tradional jusce provoked mixed senments

    in our respondents. Some felt it served no purpose because it neither beneted the vicm nor promoted

    reconciliaon between the wronging and wronged party. Others felt imprisonment carried posive

    aspects because it deterred reoccurrence. As one respondent from Lira explained, Prison gives some

    sasfacon and stops [the wrongdoer] from coming back and comming [the crime] again.62 There

    was evidence that imprisonment was not enrely absent from tradional jusce pracced in pre-colonialmes. One elder from Lira district explained that, for a case of adultery in which the perpetrator and

    vicm are from dierent clans,

    if the perpetrator is caught, before compensaon [is paid] a sharp sck is put

    into the mans leg so he cant move, like a prisoner, it doesnt pierce him but

    makes it so he cant move. He is made to be there in punishment like prison.

    He can only move within the compound [where he was caught] and he must

    stay unl his family comes to pay compensaon.63

    58 Interview with an Opinion leader, Pallisa Town, 14/08/08

    59 Interview with an Opinion Leader, Lira Town, 09/11/0860 Interview with Local Council Ofcial, 21/08/0861 Interview with an Elder, Lira, 09/11/08

    62 Focus Group Discussion with 15 people, Ogur Sub County, Dokolo County, 13/11/08

    63 Focus Group Discussion with 7 people Ogur Sub-County, Dokolo County, 13/11/08

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    22/48

    Beyond Juba 13

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    Thus, despite widely arculated shortcomings of imprisonment, it was moderately valued as a pracce

    which was not necessarily as alien to tradional pracce as might have been expected. The fact that

    many respondents were not enrely closed to imprisonment indicates a potenal openness toward

    some form of formal court acon and imprisonment as part of the transional jusce process.

    2.3 Truth-Telling, Dialogue and ResponsibilityTruth-telling was integral to achieving jusce in tradional communies in all three regions, but should

    be understood more accurately as a process of interacve dialogue between the oended and oending

    pares rather than a one-sided public declaraon. Chronologically a truth-telling dialogue would take

    place aer both an inial welcoming or cleansing process and aer retribuve acon. It was fundamental

    to tradional jusce pracces in the three regions that both the wronged and wronging party needed to

    agree on an account of the events that transpired for a given oence. However, it appeared that truth-

    telling by name was more avidly arculated by cultural leaders and other advocates of tradional jusce

    methods, while ordinary community members tended to report that elders of the two clans needed to

    sit with each other to sele on an account of what happened.

    Truth-telling as such was raised less by respondents then many of the other fundamental elements of

    tradional jusce; however, nearly all pracces had to begin with representaves from the two clans

    meeng to discuss the oence. As one respondent described, the rst meeng is only to give informaon

    that this one was killed. Then they come to an inial understandingKworcome to a compromise, a

    mutual understanding of the death.64 This meeng was oen the rst step in negoang an appropriate

    amount of material compensaon. Another respondent explained the process describing how the elders,

    sit like judges to gure out what happened, what made [one] person kill the other. Like a judge they sit

    and argue at what actually happened.65 The truth-telling was not one-sided. Both the oending and

    oended pares were meant to share their concern, a noon further emphasised by an elder from the

    Teso region who explained that, each side would be allowed to put his side of the story. They could

    also ask for witnesses.66 The two pares were meant to be engaged in a dialogue, both adming theirresponsibilies and lisng their grievances. It was a process that required both the courage to admit

    wrongdoing, but also the paence to listen to the views of the opposing side.

    That truth-telling was understood as a dialogue is a posive indicaon that such pracces were at least

    intended to produce a mutually acceptable historical account of the events in a given conict. An account

    of the events was exactly what was seen as necessary before any compensaon could be awarded and

    reconciliaon could be reached. There were understandably concerns regarding imparality in the truth-

    telling process, though this was primarily the case for issues discussed within a clan rather than between

    two clans, because within the clan there was a greater chance that the two pares might not stand on

    equal foong with regard to the elders who would be arbitrang the discussion. This challenge should beunderstood as a potenal piall for a naonal truth-telling dialogue that should ensure that the various

    pares to the discussion feel that they are voicing their opinions in a fair and unbiased environment.

    Truth-telling and dialogue were also directly linked to a need for the oending party or individual to

    take responsibility for the abuse commied. The admission of what had transpired, and the ensuing

    discussion between the pares was intended to culminate in an admission of responsibility and a request

    for forgiveness. As one respondent simply put it, the one who has killed has to ask for forgiveness.67 It is

    therefore vital to recognise that truth-telling and the acknowledgment of responsibility were necessarily

    because they allowed a process of forgiveness to eventually take place. Without the admission of truth

    and an acknowledgment of responsibility, the forgiveness and eventual reconciliaon between wronged

    and wronging party cannot take place.64 Focus Group Discussion with 4 women, Otuke , Lira, 12/11/0865 Interview with an Amnesty Commission Ofcial, Gulu Town, 26/09/08

    66 Interview with an Elder and Family, Kumi, 14/08/08

    67 Focus Group Discussion with 7 people, Otuke County, Lira, 12/08/08

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    23/48

    Beyond Juba14

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    Truth-telling and the acknowledgment of responsibility was at mes considered to be an act conducted

    by an individual, while at other mes it was discussed as a communal process. Respondents opinions of

    truth-telling varied as to whether it should pertain to the individual who commied the crime or merely

    to that persons clan. While some respondents described the importance of an individual adming

    what they had done, taking responsibility for it, apologising for it, and promising never to do it again,

    others felt that this process could also be carried out at a clan level with the clan taking responsibility. In

    parcular this was menoned in a contemporary context when an individual who commied an oencemight be sent to prison while tradional pracces between that persons clan and the clan of the vicm

    might connue in his absence. Yet it was also a part of tradional jusce as pracced in pre-colonial

    mes. During that period the perpetrator would be hidden while the clans conducted the reconciliaon

    pracces because it was thought that the persons presence might ename the anger of the wronged

    clan. This fear of igning discord was also the reason that the wronged clan would send a designated

    representave that was not a member of the immediate family of the vicm to the rst meeng.

    Truth-telling has been widely discussed as a potenal element in the post-conict transional jusce

    process in Uganda. Opinions varied greatly over its use in that context. Many communies were deeply

    hesitant to require returning abductees from the LRA conict to go through a truth-telling process. Thegeneral senment was that these individuals were not acng under their own will when comming

    abuses and thus did not need to explain their acons or movaons. There seemed to be an underlying

    apprehension about bringing up painful events that could trigger resentment from the community

    against returnees. Many respondents, parcularly from Teso and Lango, argued that abductees were

    automacally forgiven when they returned to the community. One man even felt that tradional

    pracces, should not be applied, people should just be allowed back uncondionally, the pracces are

    just a waste of me.68 Returnees themselves also seemed to feel that it would be most desirable just to

    move on and think about the future. While a group of formerly abducted men from Amuria district cited

    confession of wrongdoing as an important part of tradional jusce pracces, they did not wish publicly

    to recount their acvies during their abducon to the community. An LC 3 councillor in the area who

    had himself been abducted explained why he did not speak about his acvies during his abducon,

    saying that he,

    did not talk much about the killings, the atrocies the LRA did because [he]

    knew that they would scare them. He just thanked them for praying for [him]

    to come back, used [his] reasoning capacity, knowing that if [he] dwelled on

    that, that Kony killed people like this, that he could cut your lips, could cut

    your nose, people would get scared of that and [he] wanted to avoid that

    situaon.69

    This apprehension about publicly sharing their accounts, parcularly on the part of the returnees, fails

    to surprise from a psychological perspecve; a desire to avoid potenal conict or resentment by pungthe past behind is a common coping mechanism. However, this desire should not be an indicaon that

    truth-telling has no place in the transional jusce process. The fact that so many of the respondents who

    disapproved of the prospect of truth-telling for former abductees could also idenfy it as an important

    part of tradional jusce pracces from the past is a clear suggeson that it sll resonates today.

    Furthermore, despite some apprehension regarding truth-telling for returning former abductees, there

    was a widespread desire for more senior members of the LRA such as Kony and other top commanders

    to make public appearances, to see the destrucon they caused and to ask for forgiveness. While the

    LRA delegaon to the Juba Peace Talks did just this, there was a clear desire for further truth-telling. This

    view was expressed by one man closely connected with the Arrow Boys milia who argued, If [we are]

    going to get tradional pracces working, [we] need Kony to apologise... Abanja gave a public apology

    68 Focus Group Discussion with 7 women, Otuke County, Lira. 12/08/08

    69 Interview with Local Council Ofcial, Amuria,21/08/08

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    24/48

    Beyond Juba 15

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    which was ok.70 A group of women from the Teso region specically cited an acknowledgment of who

    had been killed by the LRA as an important part of reconciling aer the conict: they should inform [us]

    of the number of those who were killed, one woman bluntly explained.71

    Noons of confession and forgiveness may have been connected to both tradional spiritual and Chrisan

    religious beliefs as well. An Acholi man explicated the need for truth-telling and requests for forgiveness

    by linking it to a spiritual need, saying that, Acholi tradional jusce depends largely on truth-tellingbecause there is a fear, that aer death, the soul sll lives. The soul sll has power over the living. This is

    why truth-telling becomes the benchmark.72 Thus, the man expressed the idea that taking responsibility

    publicly for the abuse commied came about by pressure from a spiritual realm. Strong as the tradional

    spiritual elements of truth-telling and forgiveness were the complementarity between such pracces

    and religious doctrine was even stronger. As a pastor from the Teso region explained, we encourage

    truth-telling. If [the perpetrator] wont tell the truth, then there can be no reconciliaon. You have to be

    careful in telling your story to be honest so people believe the apology.73 Thus, there is an element of

    religious confession in the noon that the true movaons of the confessor are as important as his or her

    outward expressions of truth and request of forgiveness.74

    These dierent movaons for truth-telling are important indicaons of whether or not returning ex-

    combatants, as well as, others implicated in the conicts will be willing to give full confessions of their

    acvies. Inially, it is likely that many returnees would not have faith in tradional or Chrisan beliefs

    that might lead them to confess, posing a challenge to holding truth-telling dialogues. Furthermore,

    the deep scepcism toward the sharing of experiences by returning ex-combatants expressed by both

    ex-combatants themselves and some communies, parcularly in the Lango and Teso regions, poses

    addional barriers to this process. However, as was the case in pre-colonial mes, it may be up to the

    community to convince them to confess for the good of the clan or community, and several respondents

    suggested this was an important role for mothers in facilitang the homecoming of their sons who might

    have spent me in the bush.75 This was more likely to take place in some communies than in others.

    Many in Lango and Teso felt it was parcularly unnecessary for ex-combatants returning to those regions.

    There also remained the queson of whether commanders from the various pares to the conicts

    including the LRA, UPA, and UPDF would be willing to parcipate in any form of dialogue or truth-telling.

    Respondents voiced cauous opmism toward such potenal acvies for LRA leaders but there exists

    signicantly more scepcism regarding the parcipaon of UPDF leaders, no maer how strongly people

    felt about the need for such parcipaon.

    2.4 Material Compensaon as Reparaons

    Compensaon for losses incurred was the most important issue when considering the enre subject of

    reconciliaon. Whether the loss was suered due to war or through normal criminal behaviour (cale

    the, as an example), compensaon for the loss must occur rst. For example, the military is seen asmostly responsible for the loss of cale in Teso and to a lesser extent in Acholiland. Villagers wanted to be

    reimbursed for such losses before they would have an interest in discussing reconciliaon and forgiveness.

    The only dierence between war and non war losses is the praccal recognion that compensaon as a

    result of war will take longer.

    Compensaon was oen spoken of in the case of killings, but also broadly cited as important to abuses

    such as adultery, delement and stealing. Notably, compensaon was also discussed in the context

    70 Interview with a man, Amuria, 13/08/08

    71 Focus Group Discussion with 7 women, Lira Town, 21/08/08

    72 Interview with a Human Rights expert, Gulu Town, 22/09/0973 Interview with a Religious leader, Soroti, 17/08/0874 For a full discussion of forgiveness see the section below, and for a full discussion of the relationship between traditional justice

    practices and religion see the section of that title.

    75 Interview with a Human Rights Activist, Gulu Town, 16/09/08

  • 8/6/2019 Tradition in Transition Revised Edition May 2010

    25/48

    Beyond Juba16

    w w w . b e y o n d j u b a . o r g

    of contemporary conicts, and parcularly the LRA conict, and the variety of intended purposes of

    compensaon were invoked by respondents in explaining why this was the case. These range from

    addressing the nancial cost of a given abuse to aiding the process of reconciliaon. In comparison to

    other fundamental elements of tradional jusce, compensaon came up relavely more in Lango and

    Teso than in Acholi. In all three regions compensaon was less oen discussed by cultural authories

    than it was by other groups, such as rural communies or NGO representaves.

    Having a clear standard of compensaon depending on the crime was an important issue. For instance,

    an Acholi respondent noted that in the case of a death, the clan would demand six goats, four cows and

    perhaps some addional money.76 However, an elder explained that in the contemporary environment,

    in which one cow has been set to equal 500,000 sh