tradeline 2013 outcome-based strategies college ......tradeline 2013 college & university...
TRANSCRIPT
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
presented by:
Rachel Nelan, AIA, LEED AP Chuck Mummert, AIA, LEED AP
Outcome-based strategies for integrated research, teaching, and support programs in one facility
TRADELINE College & University Science Facilities October 28-29, 2013
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
A G E N D A
Introduction Process
– Organizational structure – Individual research vs. team science – Transition from “Mine” to “Ours”
Maximizing investment – Assessment – Developing “new” – Public / private partnerships
Integration – Co-location – Blending old and new – Iconic places
Summary
2
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
3
Tools and processes that provide positive impact on institutional success, including peer rankings, grant funding, and space allocation
T R A D E L I N E T H R E E
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
Project proposed to the government on a platform of providing enhanced interprofessional teaching and research
Physical connections between Health Sciences and Hospital provide opportunities to bridge the gap between education, research, and clinical programs
Implemented a reconstruction of the Institutional Governance regarding ownership and use of space
4
O R G A N I Z A T I O N A L G O V E R N A N C E
• No more ownership of space by individual college Deans • Space owned / allocated by Council of Health Science Deans • Space allocation expandable / contractable based on Research /
Grant Success • New standards of accountability to Council and Provincial goals
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
C H A N G E M A N A G E M E N T
5
Implemented several change management strategies
– Engaged NIH as counsel on building / maintaining successful science teams
– Began a wide campaign for the benefits of team vs. individual science to faculty
– Built mock-up of open shared lab environment in existing space – showcased the opportunities
– Initiated long-term study of the project and its influence / outcomes for team science between university and design team
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
C H A N G E M A N A G E M E N T
6
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
P R O C E S S T r a n s i t i o n f r o m “ M i n e ” t o “ O u r s ”
7
Specialty Facilities – Investment in shared, specialized equipment (e.g. simulation) – Investment in well-trained staff to understand and operate shared resources like
simulation centers and core facilities • Faculty outline the simulation “need” and expert staff provide implementation plan
Common facilities – Investment in common equipment provided in lieu of purchased with start-up funds,
allows start up funds tailored to specific research needs • Flexibility and standardization: base-line lab module accommodates all researchers and
prohibit previously required customization for specific recruits – Invest in training lab managers to support multiple researchers
• Efficiency in administrative process: create structure to support daily operations at a administrative level and enable researchers to focus on research
Location can promote interdisciplinary learning / research opportunities
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
8
S U R V E Y F R A M E W O R K
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
Current assessment
of factors
CRITICAL QUESTIONS
• TOOLS • DATA NOW 4-6 MOS 18 MOS 5 YR
Efficiency Effectiveness
S U R V E Y P R O C E S S
9
ABSTRACT: • Premise • Design • Outcomes (anticipated)
Factors which contribute to desired outcomes
Measures of desired outcomes
GROUP ONE
GROUP TWO
GROUP THREE
More efficient space
Collaboration opportunities
Design condition
assessment
Trust / team building
Recognition / rewards
Grant success
New faculty recruits
Commercial- ization of idea
Increased publications
Higher quality research
Improved provincial
health
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
Categories of Questions Data the university is seeking:
– Demographic – Institutional Support – Collaborators – who and where
Data Flad is seeking: – Efficiency and Effectiveness of
Research Environment
Data both are seeking: – Social and Collaborative
Opportunities 10
Surveys were distributed to about 300 people preparing to move into a collaborative research environment from small, dedicated, outdated research space.
S U R V E Y - S A M P L E Q U E S T I O N S
Question Example “How important are the factors of adaptability, flexibility, workflow, transparency, and operational support to your research efficiency?” (Scale 1 to 10)
*Workflow defined as appropriate lab arrangements, access to critical equipment/technology, and availability of consumables/supplies.
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
“ M I N E ” T O “ O U R S ” – R I S K S A N D R E W A R D S
Independent Interdependent
Self-Identity
Group-Identity
High Interaction and Integration
Status
Autonomy
Power
Multiple Inter-dependent
Leaders
11
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
A C C E S S T O I N S T R U M E N T S
12
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
13
Maximize investment to leverage new and existing facility assets To drive collaboration and innovation with external and internal partners
T R A D E L I N E T H R E E
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
Campus Capacity Southeast precinct development from
1950-2000 – Increased density – Limited open space/buildable area – Circulation, safety, and wayfinding
Capacity on main campus is limited – Fewer than 10 building sites – Growth potential of 4.5 million SF
Strategic renovation and renewal of existing facilities
14
L E V E R A G E E X I S T I N G
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
Site Capacity
15
L E V E R A G E E X I S T I N G
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
Old Dental: administration and education
Brauer / Tarrson: clinical
Dental Research Building: research laboratories
Dental Office Building administration and student amenities
L E V E R A G E E X I S T I N G
16
Site Capacity
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
Old Dental: administration and education
Brauer / Tarrson: clinical
Dental Research Building: research laboratories
Dental Office Building administration and student amenities
L E V E R A G E E X I S T I N G
Site Capacity
17
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
B E S T U S E O F E X I S T I N G S P A C E
18
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
Space Needs Assessment
Educational spaces: 27% growth
Research lab and support: 26% replacement and 9% growth
Office and administration: 19% growth
Student amenities and support: 19% growth
L E V E R A G E E X I S T I N G
19
Site Capacity
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
L E V E R A G E E X I S T I N G
Site Capacity
Existing Site
• 2.85 acres of buildable area
• 474,895 sf of existing buildings
20
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
New Site Opportunities
• Addition: 216,000 gsf
• Green space: 1.13 acres
• Integrate circulation patterns
L E V E R A G E E X I S T I N G
21
Site Capacity
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
D E V E L O P N E W
23
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
D E V E L O P N E W
24
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
D E V E L O P N E W
Maintain good stewardship of iconic buildings while supporting leading-edge research and teaching
25
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
Influencers for state funding priority – University’s 10-year master plan – Mandate by state legislature – University Facilities Assessment Report – Hazardous condition of existing facilities
Internal space analysis – Space needs summary – Initially resulted in stand alone 3 or 4
story building
26
W H Y D E V E L O P N E W ?
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
W H Y D E V E L O P N E W ?
Supporting the Mission Education / Teaching
– Enhanced recruitment – 20% increase in dental student
enrollment
Patient Care – Over 100,000 patient visits per year – DDS graduate program – 9 Masters programs – Dental Faculty Practice
Research – Create shared facilities to support
• School of Dentistry programs • Health sciences • School of medicine
– Regional Center for Neurosensory Disorders
– Oral and Systemic Disorders Center
27
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
Establishing a professional culture – Professional home for students – Amenities – Dealing with the practicalities
Continuing education programs
Social interaction space
28
W H Y D E V E L O P N E W ?
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
W H Y B U I L D N E W ?
Simulation Center at University of Saskatchewan Emphasis from accrediting bodies requiring
“safe” training environment Created interim simulation center to learn
new technologies and how to use the space Goal: get all practitioners involved in training
of healthcare professionals (pre-graduation and post-graduation)
Directly informed types of equipment purchased, space required and human resources required to operate
Hi-fidelity suite as well as low / lower fidelity facility
29
Interim Simulation Center at University of Saskatchewan
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
W H Y B U I L D N E W ?
Simulation Center at University of Saskatchewan
30
Health Sciences Library
Dental Clinic
Clinical Learning Resource Center
Administrative
Lecture
Atrium
Simulation Center
New facility and location promotes interdisciplinary opportunities and team approach
Resources for the facility – Shared equipment for all programs – Dedicated trained staff to operate
the facility
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
P U B L I C P R I V A T E P A R T N E R S H I P S
31
Universities &
Colleges
AERTC
Federal Laboratories
Outreach & Education
Utilities
Adelphi CUNY Hofstra Long Island University NY Institute of Technology SUNY Maritime
Brookhaven National Lab
LIPA KeySpan/National Grid
SUNY Farmingdale SUNY Stony Brook
Industry
Conoco Exxon Mobile Sikorsky Computer Associates Northrop Grumman
• Conceived in 2006 • Founded on the principle of partnership: energy producers and research institutions, regulators, and customers • Longstanding relationships between research institutions, vocational training centers, and regional companies
provide the platform for an energy research center
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
I N T E R N A L P A R T N E R S H I P S
Foundations – Finding project “champions” – Hosted events for students, alumni ,
faculty and friends
Leveraging the professional “base” – CE programs and membership as
fundraising platform – Promotional materials and message
33
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
Rejuvenate existing facilities to maximize efficiencies and economies While supporting the evolution of a new collaborative culture for research and teaching
T R A D E L I N E T H R E E
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
I N T E G R A T I O N
35
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
I N T E G R A T I O N
Interconnected Campus Linking precincts Pedestrian pathways Site / program / bridge
36
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
Interconnected Buildings Organic growth Interprofessional research / teaching Connection points / collaborative links Integrated, shared assets
37
I N T E G R A T I O N
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
I N T E G R A T I N G O L D A N D N E W
38
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
39
I N T E G R A T I O N
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
40
I N T E G R A T I O N
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
I N T E G R A T I O N
41
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
I N T E G R A T I O N
42
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
L E V E R A G I N G T H E S P A C E B E T W E E N
43
Existing Health Sciences
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
L E V E R A G I N G T H E S P A C E B E T W E E N
44
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
L E V E R A G I N G T H E S P A C E B E T W E E N
45
Existing Health Sciences
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
L E V E R A G I N G T H E S P A C E B E T W E E N
46
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
Connecting New and Existing Construction The Process
– Local government expectations and “shepherding”
– Meeting early and often with the State Construction Office (SCO)
– Specialized problem = specialized consultant
Code Summary – High-rise / one building – Smoke exhaust and make-up air – Existing building windows and openings
47
C O N N E C T I V I T Y
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
Problem solving and innovation – Atrium volume – Smoke curtains
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
– Smoke-evacuation system sized based on performance
– Modeling process – Results
48
C O N N E C T I V I T Y
Dental Commons
Main Street
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
49
I C O N I C P L A C E S
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
50
I C O N I C P L A C E S
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
51
I C O N I C P L A C E S
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
Founded in 1793 A rich history of careful campus
planning – Polk Place
• Prepared in 1920 by architectural firm McKim, Mead and White
• Established dimensions and scale of the greens and surrounding buildings
Over 40-year period – University followed the plan – Resulting in one of the most beautiful
campus quadrangles in America
I C O N I C P L A C E S
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
I C O N I C P L A C E S
Gateway to campus Tradition of building on campus Linking campus precincts
TRADELINE 2013 College & University Science Facilities
T H E T R A D E L I N E T H R E E
Tools and processes that provide positive impact on institutional success - including peer rankings, grant funding, and space allocation
Maximize investment to leverage new and existing facility assets to drive collaboration and innovation with external and internal partners
Rejuvenate existing facilities to maximize efficiencies and economies while supporting the evolution of a new collaborative culture for research and teaching
54