total number of students - 18 number of respondents …€¦ · method of teaching liked disliked...

TOTAL NUMBER OF STUDENTS -18

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS -18

III BA I Batch

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Criterian No.1 Quality of Teaching

28%

11%

50%

11%

•Well teaching and easy to understand

•Providing notes

•Using of PPT

•Helps to score good marks

•Continuous class without break

Reasons

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Criterian No.2 Method of Teaching

34%

33%

11%

22%

Method of teaching

liked disliked Explanation in both the

languages i.e kannada and

English

Continuous class without

break

Group discussion

Providing notes

Covering syllabus on time

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Criterian No.3 Teacher- student relationship

50%

39%

6% 5%

Teacher-student relationship

Good, Very Good and

Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

Friendly and supportive Not listening to students’ opinion

Solve problems Partiality

No support

05

101520253035404550

Criterian No.4 Facilities offered by

the college

22%

44%

28%

6%

05

101520253035404550


the library

33%

44%

6%

44% 17%

01020304050607080

Criterian No.6 sevices offered by the

office

0

67%

17% 16%

o

Criterian No.7 Clubs and Associations

Clubs Opinion

Sports Encouraging

NCC Reduces stage fear

Women’s forum Craft making and health

programmes

Literary ,Fine Arts and

Rovers and Rangers

Good

05

1015202530354045

Criterian No.8 Rating of Food court

23%

16%

39%

22%

0

Special dish –twice week

•Variety of food

• very slow service

• don’t do chatni every day

• payasam –once in a week

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Criterian No.9 Overall rating of the college

38%

28%

28%

6%

No campus interview this year

No strict rules for Uniform style

Improper functioning of LCD, even after

several complaints no action has been taken

Usage of cell phone should be banned

Partiality between B.com and BA courses

No proper assistance from office staff

No cleanliness in class rooms

College day celebration is boring

WELCOME TO INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION 2018-19

III BA II Batch

III BA II BATCH

Total number of students-18

Number of respondents -14

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80 Quality of Teaching

29%

71% 0

0

* Notes and other reading materials

*Group discussion

*Encourages to various activities

*Giving more information regarding

the future education ,jobs etc.

*USE OF PPT

REASONS

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Method of Teaching

72%

0

0

28%

Method of teaching

liked disliked PPT PPT-simply reading ppt

Film show Continuous lecturer in the

class- boring

Classroom discussion and

group activities

0

10

20

30

40

50

60Teacher student relationship

50%

0

50%

0


Reasons

Friendly,encouraging and supportive

Helping nature

Solving problems

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Facilities offered by the college

64% 36%

0 0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Facilities offered by the library

65%

0

29%

6%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Services offered by the office

29%

50%

0 21%

o

Clubs and Associations

Clubs Opinion

Sports Good support

NCC Develops leadership quality

Fine arts well organized programmes and

activities

Conduct of inter college music

competition

NSS Removes fear, increases self

confidence, trekking and various

other good programmes

Literary club good

05

101520253035404550

Food court

21%

30

% 0

43%

6%

•Improve the quality and taste of Rasam and

Sambar

• Reduce the canteen fees

• Different dishes

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90Overall rating of the college

79%

21%

0

0

Scholarship to the needy, poor and brave

students and not on the basis of caste

Reduce the college fees

Don’t cut the scholarship amount which are sponsored by the government

Don’t charge Rs.5 for scholarship application

Restriction on everything specially on college

day time

Try to improve the canteen food

No support from office staff

WELCOME TO INSTITUTIONAL

EVALUATION

III B.COM ‘A’

Team Members

Prof. T.P Baburaj – Chief

Mr. Jude Alfred Furtado

Mrs. Mamatha Amanna

Mr. Prashanth Shetty

Ms. Shruthi

Mr. Bharathraj S Nejar

III B.Com ‘A’

Total

Strength-91 No. Of

respondents-

79

1. Quality of Teaching

Very Good-20

Good-40

Satisfactory-17

Unsatisfactory-2

40

20 2

17

Total no. of students-79

2. Reasons

Experienced lectures

Friendly and moral support

Using PPT

Solving previous year question paper

Maintaining discipline in classroom

Giving seminars and assignment

3. Opinion on the Methods of Teaching

14

38

25

2 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

4. Methods of Teaching Liked

Use of PPT

Class seminars, assignment and illustrative

teaching

Explanation in English & Kannada

Clearing doubts

Solving question banks

Conducting class test

Group discussion

5. Methods of Teaching Disliked

Not using black board

Theory class without break

One way teaching

Targeting students

6. Teacher – Student Relationship

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35


26

34

18

1

7. Opinion on Teacher-Student Relationship

Positive Opinion-

Friendly & supportive

Caring and responsive

Clarifying doubts

Guides and motivates

Negative opinion:

Less interaction

8. Facilities Offered by the College

0

20

40

60

Very GoodGood

SatisfactoryUnsatisfactory

10

49

18

2

9. Opinion About Library

37 29 10 3 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40


10. Opinion About Office

16

42

18 3

Very Good-16

Good-42

Satisfactory-18

Unsatisfactory-3

11 &12. Opinion on Co-curricular Activities

N.S.S

Reducing stage fear

Great platform to enhance skill

Swachh Bharath

Sports Club

Very active

Conducts many tournament

Women’s Forum

It helps to increase the skill and creativity

Women empowerment

Literary Club

Conducting many programs

Only speech in every function

Gives importance to all the languages

Fine Arts

Good support from club mentors

13. Food Court Rating

20

32

9

5

9

Sales

Very Good-20

Good-32

Satisfactory-9

Unsatisfactory-5

Not Applicable

14. Suggestions for improvement of

Food Court-

* Provide liquid and washing powder

* Need of variety dishes

* Improve taste & quality

* To maintain Cleanliness

* Increase seating capacity

* Providing snacks and juice in the canteen

15. Overall Rating of the College

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

14

53

10 2

Series 1

Series 1

Most of the student rated Good

Good infrastructure/campus

Good teaching environment

Provides best education

Scholarships

Creating platform

16. Observations and Suggestions-

Changing the lunch hours to make it earlier

Cleaning washroom properly

Maintenances of projectors in the classroom

Improve water facility for drinking & non-drinking

purposes

Restroom facility to the boys and mirror in the

washroom

Introducing other courses like B.Sc., Interior

designing, Event management and other training

programs

Reduce fees

Stop collecting fines on book borrowing at the time

of exams

Add more fans and AC facility in classroom

Transport facility needed

Providing new Jersey

Office faculty need to be a bit soft and kind

Competition by associations should be notified well

in advance


EVALUATION-2018-19

III B.COM ‘B’

Team Members

Mr.Keerthi Shettigar

Mr.Prakash Nayak

Mrs.Sunitha Amin

Ms.Pavithra

Ms.Jayashree

Ms.Shruthi

III B.Com ‘B’

71

63 Total strength-71

No. Of respondents-63


10

43

9 1

Total No. of respondents- 63

Very Good -15.87%

Good -68.25%

Satisfactory-14.25%

Unsatisfactory-1.58%

2. Reasons in support

Experienced lecturers


Using PPT

Solving previous years’ question papers

Conducting seminars


8 47 6 2 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50


Total No of

Respondents-63


Class seminars and illustrative teaching


Clearing doubts


Two way communication




Lack of interaction with students

Insufficient explanation by some lecturers

Giving notes in the form of photocopies


0

10

20

30

40

Very GoodGood


15

37

8 3

Total No. Of respondents-63


Positive Opinion-



Clarifying doubts


Helpful in extra-curricular activities

Negative opinion:

Less interaction


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

5 30 18 10

Total No. of

respondents-63


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

27 32

3 1

Total No. of

respondents-63


9

29

19

6

Total No. of respondents-63

Very Good-14.28%

Good-46%

Satisfactory - 30.15%



Conduct college tour

Personality development

N.S.S

Reducing stage fear

Platform to enhance skill

Select NSS leader through voting

Literary Club


Conduct intercollegiate competitions

Women’s Forum, Ncc, Sports club, Red cross

Most of the students rated these as good

Fine Arts


Conduct more intercollegiate competitions


0

5

10

15

20

25

10

21 18

6 8

Total No. of

respondents-63


Food Court-

Need of variety dishes

Improve taste & quality

Maintain sanitation

Provide snacks and juice in the canteen

Increase the no. of students’ avail free food


0

10

20

30

40

50

8

45

8 2

16. Observations-

Lack of cleanliness in the washrooms

Poor maintenance of projectors in the classrooms

Comparatively higher fees

Lack of disciplinary actions

Congested parking

Lack of Campus drive


Deputing freshers/new lecturers

Provide necessary orientation for fresh

lecturers

Improve library facilities

Give encouragement to overall personality

development

Election for the students’ council Conduct college tour

Organize farewell function

Suggestions

Proper maintenance of washrooms/toilets

Keep the projectors in working condition

Reduce college fees

Add more fans and AC facility in classrooms

Take necessary actions for disobedience

Spacious parking facility

Organize more employment opportunities – “campus drive”

Give more importance to sports and games


EVALUATION

2018-2019

III B.COM ‘C’

Team Members

Prof. Robert Rodrigues– Chief

Mr. Prashantha Shetty

Mrs. Seema Lewis

Mrs. Medha Bhat

Mr. Shridhar

Ms. Jyothi

Institutional Evaluation 2018-2019- III B. Com ‘c'

III B.Com ‘C’

Total

Students

Strength-61

No. of

respondents-

47



Very Good-08 Good-30 Satisfactory-05 Unsatisfactory-04

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35


2. Reasons

20 respondents given Nil reply

Good teaching

Explain very well

Helpful

Use both the languages- English and Kannada

Provide Notes

Not satisfactory because no re-exam

No support from teachers

Need more freedom

Institutional Evaluation 2018-2019- III B. Com ‘C'


0

5

10

15

20

25

6

21

17

3


Total no. of

respondents-47


20 respondents have given Nil reply

Availability of photo copies of notes

Use of PPT

Some lecturers mingle freely with students

Good relationship with students

Good explanation



21 nil responses

Discrimination in attendance

Irritating behavior of some lecturers

No good relation between teachers and students

Teaching very fast

Heavy notes

Fail to control the class

Not using P.P.T

Partiality among students


7

24

13

3


0

5

10

15

20

25

30


Total no. of respondents-47



30 responses were nil

Positive Opinion-

Supportive lecturers


Good advices

Negative Opinion-

Differences in sections

Lack of understanding between teachers and

students




6

16 18

7

02468

101214161820




17

14

9

6

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Very Good - 17

Good - 14

Satisfactory - o9

Unsatisfactory- 06

Nil responds- 01




Very Good-07

Good- 19

Satisfactory-10

Unsatisfactory-11

07

19

10

11




19 Nil responses found

Average 30 marks should be given to all the

students

Women's Forum – 03

NSS- 11

Sports- 07

NCC -04

Literary Club-03



Most of the students rated these associations as good

Happy for joining these clubs

More information

Sports & Games

A few students liked Sports Association

Good quality cricket bat is needed



Very Good-15

Good- 09

Satisfactory-07

Unsatisfactory-10

NA-06


15

09

07

10

06



Food Court-

•Provide snacks

•Quality Rice

•Lack of Space

•Special food items once in a week

•Provide Non-vegetarian food



6

23

15

3

0

5

10

15

20

25




Mirror in the rest room

Boys’ Rest Room needed

More parking space needed

Not to divide sections on the basis marks

Reduce fees and donations

Cleanliness is needed in Class rooms, Ladies

Rest Rooms and Boys Toilets

Support for attending intercollegiate fest

Discrimination on the basis of class, sections

and students



EVALUATION

III BCA

Team Members

Prof.T.P Baburaj – Chief

Mr.Prasanna Shetty

Mrs.Chitra Shetty

Mr.Ashwin Shetty A

Mrs.Ashwini

Mr.Prashanth Devadiga

III BCA

28

23 Total No. of student-

28

Total No. of

respondents-23


4

12

6

1

Very Good-17%

Good-52%

Satisfactory-26%

Unsatisfactory-4%

2. Reasons

Simple way of teaching

Supportive

Friendly, approachable all the time and

provide extra knowledge

Using PPT

Best lecturers compared to other colleges


2

10

12

0 0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14



Practical way of teaching

Simple teaching with real world example

Clearing doubts Using PPT


Some classes are boring


0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

6

14

3

0


Positive Opinion-



0

2

4

6

8

10

12

2

9 11

1


4

15

4

0 0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16



1

19

3

0

Very Good-1

Good-19

Satisfactory-3

Unsatisfactory-0


N.S.S


Women’s Forum, Fine Arts,NCC, Redcrosss



0

5

6 5

5

Very Good-0

Good-5

Satisfactory-6

Unsatisfactory-5

Not Applicable-5


Food Court-

•Improve taste & quality

•Providing snacks and juice in the canteen

•Special meals once in a week

•Improve the quality of rasam


4

10

5

1 0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Very Good Good Satisafactory Unsatisfactory

16. Observations and Suggestions



Improve the systems in laboratory

Must be strict to all the students not on the basis of

stream

Trip with lecturers

Total number of students – 9


Quality of teaching in the college.

Very Good-6

Good-1

Satisfactory-1

Unsatisfactory- nil

very

good

75%

good

12%

satisfactory

13%

unsatisfactory

0% response

Reasons in support of above response.

Teaching skill

Detailed explanation

Supportive teachers

Co-ordination

Quality teaching punctuality

Methods used for teaching

Very Good-5

Good-1

Satisfactory-2

Unsatisfactory- nil

very good

62%

good

13%

satisfactor

y

25%

unsatisfactory

0%

response

Teaching methods liked by most

Use of PPT

Teachers students relationship

Interactive teaching

Methods of teaching disliked

Explanation in Kannada

One way teaching

Teacher student relationship

Very Good-5

Good-3

Satisfactory-nil

Unsatisfactory- nil

very good

62%

good

38%

satisfactory

0% unsatisfactory

0%

response

Reasons in support of above response

Friendly

Supportive

Understanding


Very Good-nil

Good-nil

Satisfactory-3

Unsatisfactory- 5

very good

0% good

0%

satisfactor

y

37% Unsatisfactor

y

63%

Response

Materials and facilities offered by the library

Very Good-7

Good-nil

Satisfactory-1

Unsatisfactory- nil

very good

87%

good

0%

satisfactort

y

13%

unsatisfactory

0% response


Very Good-nil

Good-nil

Satisfactory-2

Unsatisfactory- 6

very good

0%

good

0% satisfactor

y

25%

unsatisfact

ory

75%

response

Views on the quality of Co-Curricular activities

Good – many number of programmes are

conducted.

Views on functioning of the associations

no response for this.

College food court

Very Good-nil

Good-6

Satisfactory-1

Unsatisfactory- nil

Not applicable -1

very good

0%

good

75%

satisfactory

12%

unsatisfactory

0%

not applicable

13%

response

Suggestions to improve the food court.

Special dishes – veg any one day in a week

Overall rating of the college

Very Good-nil

Good-nil

Satisfactory-8

Unsatisfactory- nil

very good

0%

good

0%

satisfactor

y

100%

unsatisfact

ory

0%

response

Suggestions/ observations for improvement of the college

M.Com students are not recognised

PPT – not working

No proper sitting arrangements and electricity facility during exams

Services offered by the office are unsatisfactory

Industrial visits was not conducted even though lecturers and students

were interested.

No encouragement

Achievements are ignored

Lecturers with good English communication skills are to be appointed.

Eligible Lecturers with NET & PhD need to be appointed

Partiality ( UG &PG)

No support from college

Not involved in co-curricular activities

Teaching staffs are supportive

TOTAL NUMBER OF STUDENTS -18

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS -18

III BA I Batch

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Criterian No.1 Quality of Teaching

28%

11%

50%

11%

•Well teaching and easy to understand

•Providing notes

•Using of PPT

•Helps to score good marks

•Continuous class without break

Reasons

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Criterian No.2 Method of Teaching

34%

33%

11%

22%

Method of teaching

liked disliked Explanation in both the

languages i.e kannada and

English

Continuous class without

break

Group discussion

Providing notes

Covering syllabus on time

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Criterian No.3 Teacher- student relationship

50%

39%

6% 5%


Good, Very Good and

Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

Friendly and supportive Not listening to students’ opinion

Solve problems Partiality

No support

05

101520253035404550


the college

22%

44%

28%

6%

05

101520253035404550


the library

33%

44%

6%

44% 17%

01020304050607080

Criterian No.6 sevices offered by the

office

0

67%

17% 16%

o

Criterian No.7 Clubs and Associations

Clubs Opinion

Sports Encouraging

NCC Reduces stage fear

Women’s forum Craft making and health

programmes

Literary ,Fine Arts and

Rovers and Rangers

Good

05

1015202530354045

Criterian No.8 Rating of Food court

23%

16%

39%

22%

0

Special dish –twice week

•Variety of food

• very slow service

• don’t do chatni every day

• payasam –once in a week

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Criterian No.9 Overall rating of the college

38%

28%

28%

6%

No campus interview this year

No strict rules for Uniform style

Improper functioning of LCD, even after

several complaints no action has been taken

Usage of cell phone should be banned

Partiality between B.com and BA courses

No proper assistance from office staff

No cleanliness in class rooms

College day celebration is boring

WELCOME TO INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION 2018-19

III BA II Batch

III BA II BATCH

Total number of students-18


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80 Quality of Teaching

29%

71% 0

0

* Notes and other reading materials

*Group discussion

*Encourages to various activities

*Giving more information regarding

the future education ,jobs etc.

*USE OF PPT

REASONS

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Method of Teaching

72%

0

0

28%

Method of teaching

liked disliked PPT PPT-simply reading ppt

Film show Continuous lecturer in the

class- boring

Classroom discussion and

group activities

0

10

20

30

40

50

60Teacher student relationship

50%

0

50%

0


Reasons

Friendly,encouraging and supportive

Helping nature

Solving problems

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70


64% 36%

0 0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Facilities offered by the library

65%

0

29%

6%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60


29%

50%

0 21%

o

Clubs and Associations

Clubs Opinion

Sports Good support

NCC Develops leadership quality

Fine arts well organized programmes and

activities

Conduct of inter college music

competition

NSS Removes fear, increases self

confidence, trekking and various

other good programmes

Literary club good

05

101520253035404550

Food court

21%

30

% 0

43%

6%

•Improve the quality and taste of Rasam and

Sambar

• Reduce the canteen fees

• Different dishes

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90Overall rating of the college

79%

21%

0

0

Scholarship to the needy, poor and brave

students and not on the basis of caste

Reduce the college fees

Don’t cut the scholarship amount which are sponsored by the government

Don’t charge Rs.5 for scholarship application

Restriction on everything specially on college

day time

Try to improve the canteen food

No support from office staff


EVALUATION

III B.COM ‘A’

Team Members

Prof. T.P Baburaj – Chief

Mr. Jude Alfred Furtado

Mrs. Mamatha Amanna

Mr. Prashanth Shetty

Ms. Shruthi

Mr. Bharathraj S Nejar

III B.Com ‘A’

Total

Strength-91 No. Of

respondents-

79


Very Good-20

Good-40

Satisfactory-17

Unsatisfactory-2

40

20 2

17

Total no. of students-79

2. Reasons

Experienced lectures


Using PPT

Solving previous year question paper

Maintaining discipline in classroom

Giving seminars and assignment


14

38

25

2 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40



Use of PPT

Class seminars, assignment and illustrative

teaching


Clearing doubts


Conducting class test

Group discussion




One way teaching

Targeting students


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35


26

34

18

1


Positive Opinion-



Clarifying doubts


Negative opinion:

Less interaction


0

20

40

60

Very GoodGood


10

49

18

2


37 29 10 3 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40



16

42

18 3

Very Good-16

Good-42

Satisfactory-18

Unsatisfactory-3


N.S.S

Reducing stage fear


Swachh Bharath

Sports Club

Very active

Conducts many tournament

Women’s Forum

It helps to increase the skill and creativity

Women empowerment

Literary Club


Only speech in every function

Gives importance to all the languages

Fine Arts

Good support from club mentors


20

32

9

5

9

Sales

Very Good-20

Good-32

Satisfactory-9

Unsatisfactory-5

Not Applicable


Food Court-

* Provide liquid and washing powder

* Need of variety dishes

* Improve taste & quality

* To maintain Cleanliness

* Increase seating capacity

* Providing snacks and juice in the canteen


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

14

53

10 2

Series 1

Series 1

Most of the student rated Good

Good infrastructure/campus

Good teaching environment

Provides best education

Scholarships

Creating platform


Changing the lunch hours to make it earlier

Cleaning washroom properly

Maintenances of projectors in the classroom

Improve water facility for drinking & non-drinking

purposes

Restroom facility to the boys and mirror in the

washroom

Introducing other courses like B.Sc., Interior

designing, Event management and other training

programs

Reduce fees

Stop collecting fines on book borrowing at the time

of exams


Transport facility needed

Providing new Jersey


Competition by associations should be notified well

in advance


EVALUATION-2018-19

III B.COM ‘B’

Team Members

Mr.Keerthi Shettigar

Mr.Prakash Nayak

Mrs.Sunitha Amin

Ms.Pavithra

Ms.Jayashree

Ms.Shruthi

III B.Com ‘B’

71

63 Total strength-71

No. Of respondents-63


10

43

9 1

Total No. of respondents- 63

Very Good -15.87%

Good -68.25%

Satisfactory-14.25%
