topic 3 – population theory
DESCRIPTION
Topic 3 – Population Theory. A – Demographic Transition B – Malthusianism C – Neo-Malthusianism D – Creative Pressure. A. Demographic Transition. 1. Concept What is the demographic transition? 2. Stages What are the major stages of its occurrence? 3. Geographical Variations - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
GEOG 102 – Population, Resources, and the Environment
Professor: Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue
Topic 3 – Population Theory
A – Demographic TransitionB – MalthusianismC – Neo-MalthusianismD – Creative Pressure
Demographic Transition
■ 1. Concept• What is the demographic transition?
■ 2. Stages• What are the major stages of its occurrence?
■ 3. Geographical Variations• Does the demographic transition occurred at the same time and
places?
AA
11 Concept
■ Overview• A “social modernization” of the reproduction process:
• Improved health care and access to family planning.• Higher educational levels, especially among women.• Economic growth and rising per capita income levels.• Urbanization and growing employment opportunities.
• Involves moving from one equilibrium to another:• Initial equilibrium: High birth and death rates.• Final equilibrium: Low birth and death rates.
• Theory backed by solid empirical evidence.• Involves four phases.
Concept
■ Epidemiological Transition• Focuses on changes over time in the causes of mortality
affecting certain populations:• Health conditions.• Disease patterns.
• Result in a decline in death rates and an increase of life expectancy.
• The society goes through a transition from communicative diseases to degenerative diseases.
11
Concept
■ Stages in epidemiological transition• Three identifiable stages in the
transition.• 1) Age of communicative
diseases.• 2) Age of receding pandemics.• 3) Age of degenerative and man-
made diseases.
Communicative Diseases
Receding Pandemics
Degenerative and Man-made Diseases
11
70 years
50 years
30 yearsHigh FertilityHigh Mortality
High FertilityDecreasing Mortality
Low FertilityLow Mortality
Survivorship of the British Population, 17th and 20th Centuries
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
17th Century
1999 (M)
1999 (F)
11
Demographic Transition Theory
190018001700
Stage I Stage II Stage IVStage III
Birth Rate
Death Rate
2000
11
DemographicGrowth
Population
Crude Birth Rates, Western Europe, 1751-1991
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1751
1771
1791
1811
1831
1851
1871
1891
1911
1931
1951
1971
1991
Britain
Ireland
France
Sweden
Germany
Italy
11
Crude Death Rates, Western Europe, 1751-1991
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1751
1771
1791
1811
1831
1851
1871
1891
1911
1931
1951
1971
1991
Britain
Ireland
France
Sweden
Germany
Italy
11
Stages in Demographic Transition
Stage I Stage II Stage III Stage IV
High birth rates High birth rates Falling birth rates Low birth rates
No or little Family PlanningParents have many children because few surviveMany children are needed to work the landChildren are a sign of virilityReligious beliefs and cultural traditions encourage large families
Family Planning usedA lower infant mortality ratesIndustrialization means less need for laborIncreased desire for material possessions and less desire for large familiesEmancipation of women
Children as liabilities instead of assets
High death rates Falling death rates Low death rates Low death rates
Disease and plague (e.g. bubonic, cholera, kwashiorkor)Famine, uncertain food supplies and poor dietPoor hygiene, no clean water or sewage disposal
Improved medicineImproved sanitation and waters supplyImprovements in food production in terms of quality and quantityImproved transport to move foodA decrease in child mortality
11
Fertility Declines, Real and Projected (1950-2050)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
TFR
(2.1
= n
o po
pula
tion
grow
th)
Developing Developed Africa Asia South and Central America
11
33 Geographical Variations
■ Developed countries• Took 250 years for most developed economies to go through
their own demographic transition (from 1750 to 2000).• Population growth never surpassed the capacity of these
economies to accommodate it.■ Developing countries• Demographic transition started in the 20th century:
• The most advanced segment after WWI.• The least advanced segment after WWII.
• Very few have went trough the transitory mutation.• Most of them have a type III demographic transition.• By the time they reach type IV, a huge amount a population will
be added to their populations.
Beginning of Demographic Transition33
Fertility Transition in some Countries, 1962-2000
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Nigeria
Philippines
Egypt
Banglad
esh
India
Mexico
Indone
siaBraz
il
China
South K
orea
TFR
1962198219902000
33
Geographical Variations
■ Will demographic transition occur all around the world?• Model based upon the Western experience.• Evidence underline that the process is likely.• Problems:
• The base population in the developing world is large.• Low percentages of population increase will result in large numbers of
additional people.• Limited possibilities for immigration (Unlike Europe at the end of the 19th
century and early during the 20th century).• Religious and cultural influences.
33
Malthusianism
■ 1. Concept• What are the principles of Malthusianism?
■ 2. The Malthusian Crisis• What does a Malthusian crisis involves?
■ 3. Contemporary Issues
BB
11 Concept
■ Context• Thomas Malthus (1766-1834) in his book
“Essays on the Principle of Population” (1798).• Relationships between population and food
resources (area under cultivation).• Growth of available resources is linear while
population growth is often non-linear (exponential).
• Took notice of famines in the Middle Ages, especially in the early 14th century (1316).
• From the data he gathered, population was doubling every 25 years.
• Over a century’s time, population would rise by a factor of 16 while food rose by a factor of 4.
Demographicgrowth
Resourcegrowth
Deficit
The Malthusian Crisis
■ The “Malthusian crisis”• Available agricultural spaces are limited.• Technical progresses (machinery, irrigation, fertilizers, and new
types of crops) are slow to occur.• Increasing incapability to support the population.• If this persists, the population will eventually surpass the
available resources.• The outcomes are “Malthusian crises”:
• Food shortages.• Famines.• War and epidemics.
• “Fix” the population in accordance with available resources.• Necessity of a “moral restraint” on reproduction.
22
Overexploitation
The Malthusian Crisis
Population
Resources
Technological Innovation
Time
22
Quantity t2
t3
t1
The Malthusian Crisis
■ The Malthusian Crisis has not occurred• Malthus has been criticized on several accounts during the last
200 years.• Religious view (Protestantism), racist and elitist.• Did not foresee the demographic transition:
• Changes in the economy that changed the role of children in the industrializing societies.
• Failed to account for improvements in technology:• Enabled food production to increase at rates greater than arithmetic, often
at rates exceeding those of population growth.• Enabled to access larger amounts of resources.• Enabled forms of contraception.
22
33 Contemporary Issues
■ The Malthusian crisis today• Demographic growth:
• Between 1960 and 2000, three billion persons were added to the global population.
• To sustain this growth, agricultural resources had to be doubled.• Required housing space surpassed all that was constructed since the
beginning of mankind.• Agricultural growth:
• Between 1960 and 1990, grain yields has increased by 92% while cultivated surfaces have only increased by 8%.
• Foresee a limit to growth in agricultural production.• Consumption growth.• Environmental degradation.
Contemporary Issues
■ Relevance of the Malthusian theory• Was Malthus right or the trend in agricultural production will
again increase to surpass population growth?• Are improvements in agricultural techniques enough to answer
demand?• The next 25 years will be crucial and will bring forward answers
to these questions.• The work of Malthus continues to be important to demographers:
• Influence of many contemporary theorists from various academic disciplines.
• Built upon Malthus’s ideas and linked them to modern sciences.
33
Neo-Malthusianism
■ 1. Neo-Malthusian Concepts• How can the Malthusian theory be adapted to the current
situation?■ 2. The Commons• In which way common resources are used?
■ 3. Neo-Malthusianism and Human Reproduction• Is reproduction a right or privilege?
CC
Neo-Malthusian Concepts
■ Carrying capacity• Issue linked with the carrying capacity of land.• Limits to absorb ever-greater numbers of people.• Population growth has environmental impacts.• Support of family planning, contraception and abortion.• Population problems cannot be addressed through technology
beyond the short term.■ Overpopulation• A multidimensional issue linked with the carrying capacity.• Numbers should be linked with level of consumption.• The United States would be more overpopulated than China.
11
Neo-Malthusian Concepts
■ Population bomb• Fast population growth seen as a threat:
• The word “bomb” obviously refer to the lethal character of the problem.• Brought forward by Paul Ehrlich in the late 1960s.• Most Third World countries were in the middle of their
demographic transition at the time.• Ehrlich and others continued the basic Malthusian numbers
game in which population growth outstrips food production.• Moved Beyond Malthus in their consideration of many
environmental issues.
11
Neo-Malthusian Concepts
■ Limits to growth• “Club of Rome”, 1972• Scientific report on the limits to growth.• Used computer models for the first time:
• Population growth, food per capita, industrial output, resources and pollution.
• Blaming huge waste of resources by developed economies.
• Supporting a zero growth policy.• Main arguments:
• Resources are in finite number.• Demographic growth cannot occur
indefinitely.• Must stop at some point.
11
Population
Industrial output
Resources
The Commons
■ Definition• Resources that we share as a population:
• Land and other inputs into the food production process.• Oceans and their contents, particularly fish as a food source.• The atmosphere.• Sources of energy.• Landscape for recreational purposes.
• Resources of the commons are in finite quantities while access is free (in theory).
• The world is finite and can support only a finite population:• Population growth must eventually equal zero.• Otherwise we have to abandon certain freedoms of access to the
Commons.• The only way freedoms can be saved is by relinquishing the freedom to
breed.
22
The Commons
■ Example of using the commons• Decision on whether to increase the size of herd that grazes on
common lands.• A rational being seeking to maximize his gain:
• Positive component of adding animals is additional income from additional animals.
• Negative component is the overgrazing caused by the additional animals.• The costs are shared by those using the common grazing lands.• Decision to add the extra animals to his herd.• Unfortunately, all of the other villages will arrive at the same conclusion,
do the same thing.• The outcome is the ruin to the environment.
22
The Commons22
Commons(sustain 14)
1
Village
2
4
3
Cattle (grazing)Benefits: +1 eachCosts: -1 each
Village 1 2 3 4
Cattle 3 3 3 3
Commons 14 – 12 = 2
Cattle (+1)4
(+1)4
(+1)4
(+1)4
Commons 14 – 16 = -2 (overgrazing)
The Commons
■ The tragedy of the commons• Freedom in a commons brings ruin to all.• All the resources will be used.
■ Solutions• Private property:
• Removes some of the Commons from access.• Encourages conservation and wise management.• Vested interest in maintaining it for future use.
• Collective property:• Parts of the Commons not possible to divide into private segments -
atmosphere, oceans, etc.• Collective (global) ownership.• Taxation and coercive laws as the primary means of preservation.
22
World Fish Catch per Capita, 1950-1999
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
1950 1953 1956 1959 1962 1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998
22
Commercial Harvests in the Northwest Atlantic of Some Fish Stocks, 1950-95 (in 1,000 metric tons)
0
50
100
150
200
250
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Flatfishes (flounders, halibuts, etc.) Haddock Red hake Atlantic cod
22
Carbon Emissions from Fossil Fuel Burning, 1751-2001
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
1751 1771 1791 1811 1831 1851 1871 1891 1911 1931 1951 1971 1991
Mill
ions
of t
ons
22
Neo-Malthusianism and Human Reproduction
■ Human reproduction• Malthus was advocating “moral restraint”:
• A religious bias.• Modern contraception:
• A tool of population control (state perspective).• A tool of freedom in reproductive choice (market perspective).
• Against subsidizing reproduction:• Welfare state.• Many international aid programs.• Remove the punishment (such as children starving to death) from having
too many offspring.
33
Neo-Malthusianism and Human Reproduction
■ Freedom to breed• Clashes between neo-Malthusianism and human rights.• UN’s Declaration of Human Rights:
• Defense of the individual family’s right to determine family size.• Support the freedom to breed for political reasons.• Few governments are able or willing to enforce restrictions on the
reproduction of their populations.• Human population control cannot be achieved through voluntary
means.• With freedom to breed comes equal obligations:
• Responsibility to the welfare of the children.• Difficult concept to grasp, especially by an uneducated population.
• Each new individual competes with other for resources.
33
The Creative Pressure
■ 1. Concept and Issues• What does the creative pressure theory imply?
■ 2. Limits to Productivity• What may be the limits to productivity?
■ 3. Creative Pressure vs. Neo-Malthusianism• Can Neo-Malthusianism and creative pressure be reconciled?
DD
Concept and Issues
■ Concept• Opposed to the Malthusian and
Neo-Malthusian perspectives.• Brought forward in the early 1960s.• View shared by several economists.• Population has a positive impact on
economic growth.• “Necessity is the mother of all
inventions”.• Population pressure forces the
finding of solutions:• Agriculture.• Economy.
11Demographic
growth
Higher occupationdensities
Pressures to increase
productivity
Innovations
Productivity growth
?P
rob
lem
Solu
tion
Ou
tcom
e
Concept and Issues
■ Technological innovation and agriculture• Intensification of agriculture.• New methods of fertilization.• Pesticide use.• Irrigation.• Multi-cropping systems in which more than one crop would be
realized per year.■ Creative pressure and global population growth• Would lead to new productivity gains.• Humans don’t deplete resources but, through technology, create
them.• Resources will become more abundant.• Help overcome shortage in food production and employment.
11
Limits to Productivity
■ Limits of food production by environmental factors• Soil exhaustion and erosion.• Evolutionary factors such as the development of greater
resistance to pesticides.• Climate change.• Loss of productive soils due to land use conversion to other
purposes, such as urbanization.• Water shortages and pollution.
■ Limits by technology• May be available but not shared.• Maybe too expensive for some regions (e.g. desalination).
22
Creative Pressure vs. Neo-Malthusianism33Carrying capacity
Demographic transitionPopulation
Resources
21st century
Creativepressure
Environmentaldegradation
19th-20th century
Neo-Malthusianism
Malthusianism
Creative Pressure vs. Neo-Malthusianism
■ Neo-Malthusianism• Population consumes resources.• Population growth has
environmental consequences.• Notion of carrying capacity.• Population should be controlled
by strict family planning policies.• Overpopulation linked with levels
of consumption.
■ Creative Pressure• Population induces the creation
of resources and the substitution to alternative sources.
• “Necessity is the mother of all inventions”.
• Population will adjust itself to the quantity of available resources.
33