Tom Ivar BarkaLead Planner at Bergen Group Rosenberg

Bergen Grouptom-ivar.barka@bergengroup.no

November, 2012

Proteus – Between Safran and IFSat Bergen Group Rosenberg

…and more

Bergen Group Rosenberg

Employees

Overview of data to integrate

• Activities and their R-Fields• Calendars (for timephasing)

• Activities Table (to compare)• AO Table• PO Table• DocPkg (DP) Table• Doc. Table• Oper Table• Eng. Obj. Table

Planners Workspace

Compare

AO Table

PO Table

DP Table

Activities Act .Table

[Level 5]

[Level 4]

Oper Table

Doc Table[Level 6]

Eng. Obj. Table

Logging on to «Planners Workspace»

Act – Engineering Objects, and their milestones

All the data in one screen

Act – DocPkgs - DocumentsAll the data in one screen

Act – POs - OperationsAll the data in one screen

The 3 activities expanded at the same time.All the data in one screen

And then turn on and off what you need to seeTime-phasing the data

Can be exported to various other formats than pdfObject Statuses on a timeline

On Level 4 and Level 5 dataSplit histograms

Planners Workspace

Makes a planners life easier

Overview of data to integrate

• Projects/Tenders• MainCat List• Discipline List• Activities

Total Plan

TimeCatcher Formula MPP

• Projects• Activities

• Actual Hrs for activities • Manpower availability

History• Monthly Snapshots of

MainCat aggreated data

History

• Detail history (Transparent Reports)

Scenario Data

Safran Data

Drill down from Project level to activity level, show changes relative last monthProject portfolio overview

Pivot on the delta to see changes (per MainCat) relative last monthProject portfolio overview

Show historic tracking as well as live forecast.Project portfolio overview

Compare resource availability with demand for a selected set of activitiesProject portfolio overview

True history is shown together with live planProject portfolio overview

4 Key features of the solution:Project portfolio overview

1. Drill-Down Portfolio Overview with KPI values derived from lowest level data.2. Generate Historical Tracking of Earned Value Metrics (Scope, Actuals, Earned) at

aggregated level (*). Show in histogram together with forecast data from live plan.3. Pulling data from resident MPP (Manpower Projection System) to get correlation

between demand and supply of resources.

4. (*) A «Report Container» will be saved at each cutoff (Month) to allow revisiting detail status at later time – and create audit trails.

The concept of storing histotoric data at aggregated level makes system «lean» (adds to performance) while the option is open to revisit any point in history with the «same Proteus UI» with full details and reporting options.

Project portfolio overview

Overview of data to integrate

Cost & Weight

• Manual Items• Weight Factors

Weight Factors

User Overrides

Comp Format

PDMS Data

Manual Items

Vie

w

ADMIN

Weight and Cost Drill Down into details from project and disciplineContract follow up on weight and cost

Allows deriving costsCombining PDMS items with Comp Schedule

Raw (measurement) Data from PDMSContract follow up on weight and cost

Contract follow up on weightCompensated Hours pr Discipline/Phase

Using Proteus to combine PDMS data with Comp Schedule to do cost and weight reports

Contract follow up on weight and cost