Toledo Public Schools

2008 - 2009

Performance Report

Toledo Public Schools Achieves Continuous Improvement

Academic Emergency•0%-30.9% of Indicators and •Performance Index 0-69*

Academic Watch• 31%-49.9% of Indicators or• Performance Index of 70-79*

Continuous Improvement•50%-74.9% of Indicators or•Performance Index of 80-89* or•Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) or•Value Added Growth

TPS remains in Continuous Improvement in 2008-2009

TPS District Ratings

06-07 07-08 08-09

5 Indicators 5 Indicators 6 Indicators

PI 79.1 PI 80.1 PI 81.0

AcademicWatch

ContinuousImprovement

ContinuousImprovement

Indicators Achieved on Local Report Card 2008-2009

OAT Writing (Grade 4) 75.4%OGT Reading (Grade 10) 77.9%OGT Writing (Grade 10) 88.7%OGT Reading (Grade 11) 87.5% OGT Writing (Grade 11) 88.6% Attendance 94.9%

Third Grade Scores

67.8

%

65.2

%

66.0

%

66.4

%

71.0

%

65.6

%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Reading Math

Subject

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t

06-07

07-08

08-09

Fourth Grade Scores

65.4

% 74.8

%

57.9

%

59.2

%

73.5

%

68.8

%

69.9

%

75.4

%

65.0

%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Reading Writing Math

Subject

Per

cen

t P

rofi

cien

t

06-07

07-08

08-09

Fifth Grade Scores

64.2

%

41.3

%

39.6

% 46.2

%56.3

%

43.1

%

45.5

%

44.9

%54.8

%

44.5

%

40.1

% 51.2

%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Reading Math SS Science

Subject

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t

06-07

07-08

08-09

Sixth Grade Scores

57.0

%

49.9

%

52.2

%62.3

%

63.7

%

53.6

%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

Reading Math

Subject

Per

cen

t P

rofi

cien

t

06-07

07-08

08-09

Seventh Grade Scores

51.5

% 63.4

%

39.7

%

54.5

%

71.5

%

36.6

%

53.2

%

70.7

%

49.1

%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Reading Writing Math

Subject

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t

06-07

07-08

08-09

Eighth Grade Scores

21.8

%

41.1

%

59.2

%

30.9

%

62.4

%

46.4

%

26.5

%

31.6

%

47.5

%

36.5

%

22.3

% 32.9

%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Reading Math SS Science

Subject

Per

cen

t P

rofi

cien

t

06-07

07-08

08-09

Tenth Grade Scores

78.6

%

85.2

%

64.9

%

63.7

%

54.2

%

76.7

%

81.7

%

64.0

%

66.9

%

55.6

%

77.9

% 88.7

%

69.7

%

72.3

%

60.6

%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Reading Writing Math SS Science

Subject

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t

06-07

07-08

08-09

Eleventh Grade Scores

88.3

%

89.2

%

80.8

%

80.5

%

70.9

%

88.7

%

90.5

%

79.5

%

79.1

%

69.8

%

87.5

%

88.6

%

81.3

%

81.5

%

71.5

%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Reading Writing Math SS Science

Subject

Per

cen

t P

rofi

cien

t

06-07

07-08

08-09

Attendance Rate

92.3

%

94.9

%

95.2

%

0.0%10.0%

20.0%30.0%

40.0%50.0%

60.0%70.0%

80.0%90.0%

100.0%

06-07 07-08 08-09

Year

Rat

e

Graduation Rate

87.6

%

86.7

%

90.4

%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

05-06 06-07 07-08

Year

Rat

e

Additional Highlights

20 Schools Reach AYP

Beverly Burroughs BTI Crossgates Edgewater Elmhurst Glendale-Feilbach Grove Patterson Harvard Larchmont Lincoln

McKinley

Old Orchard

Old West End

Ottawa River

Raymer

Start

Stewart

Toledo Early College High School

Toledo Technology Academy

38 Schools Attain Continuous Improvement or Higher

Excellent Elmhurst Harvard Start TECHS TTA

Birmingham Bowsher Burroughs BTI Byrnedale Chase Crossgates Garfield Glendale-

Feilbach Hawkins Humanities

Keyser Larchmont Lincoln Longfellow McKinley Old Orchard Raymer Reynolds Rogers SMART Stewart Walbridge Whittier

Continuous Improvement Effective Arlington Beverly Edgewater Grove

Patterson Navarre Oakdale OWE

Academy Ottawa River Waite

5 Schools Receive Excellent RatingElmhurst 94.2% 4th grade Writing Met AYP Performance Index = 99.1 Met 8 out of 10 Indicators

Harvard 97.5% 3rd grade Math Met AYP Performance Index = 101.1 Met 10 out of 12 Indicators

Start 96.3% 10th grade Writing Met AYP Performance Index = 102.2 Met 11 out of 12 Indicators

TECHS 100% Proficient in Reading and Writing in 10th grade and Reading, Writing, Math and SS in 11th grade Met AYP Performance Index = 110.1 Met 11 out of 11 Indicators

TTA Sixth year rated as Excellent Met AYP Performance Index = 108.0 100% Proficient in Writing in 10th grade and Reading, Writing, Math and Science in 11th grade Met 12 of 12 indicators

2008-2009 Indicators Performance Index

Adequate Yearly ProgressNo Child Left Behind

Performance Index Performance Index Score:One composite score for a school or district calculated by combining scores across all performance levels, tested grades and subjects.

Performance Index

81

.0

80

.1

79

.1

70

75

80

85

06-07 07-08 08-09

Year

Pe

rfo

rma

nc

e In

de

x

Value Added

• A growth model that analyzes student test scores to determine the impact teachers and schools have on students’ academic performance over time

• The district’s overall Value Added rating is above expected growth.

31 Schools Above Expected Gains

• Arlington• Beverly• Birmingham• Burroughs• Chase• East Side Central• Edgewater• Fulton• Garfield• Glendale-Feilbach• Grove Patterson• Hale• Harvard• Hawkins• Keyser• Lagrange

• Longfellow• Marshall• McKinley• McTigue• Navarre• Oakdale• Old Orchard• Old West End• Ottawa River• Raymer• Reynolds• Riverside• Rosa Parks• Sherman• Whittier

Suspensions Over Time

10,000

11,000

12,000

13,000

14,000

15,000

16,000

17,000

06-07 07-08 08-09

Year

Nu

mb

er o

f S

usp

ensi

on

s