todd hubmer, pe. wetland conservation in the news

21
How do Wetlands Factor into New Infiltration Policies? Todd Hubmer, PE

Upload: abel-bridges

Post on 27-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

How do Wetlands Factor into New Infiltration Policies?

Todd Hubmer, PE

Wetland Conservation in the News

Wetland Benefits

Habitat – Plants & AnimalsWater Quality – Filter & Clean RunoffGroundwater Recharge – Hold & Infiltrate RunoffFlood Protection – Store Water during Snow/Rain Events

Wetland TypesGroundwater Dependant

FENSStreamsMarshesBogs

Wetland TypesSurface Water Dependant

Vernal PoolsMarshesFlood Plain Fringe

Do Current Trends in Watershed Management Anticipate Impacts to

Wetlands?

Current PoliciesRequire stormwater runoff to be treated before dischargeTrends for water quality treatment are focused on runoff

volume reductionVolume reduction through infiltration, water reuse,

rainwater harvesting, etc.

Current Policies

Require onsite retention of stormwater runoff in the amount of:

1. 0.5” Runoff over impervious2. 1.0” Rainfall from impervious3. 1.1” Runoff over impervious4. 2.8” Rainfall (two-year storm) from contributing drainage area

No provisions for looking at downstream water budget impacts

Water Budget

Land Use (Impervious %)Annual Runoff Volume

(acre-feet/acre)

Agricultural (0%) 0.32

Residential (50%) 0.59

Commercial (70%) 1.31

Fully Developed (100%) 1.82

Watershed Runoff Contributions:

How do the policies affect the water budget in a watershed?

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Fully Developed -100% Impervious (P8)

Commercial - 70% Impervious (P8)

Residential - 50% Impervious (P8)

Volume Reduction Requirement (Rainfall in Inches)

% A

nn

ua

l V

olu

me

Re

mo

ve

d

0.5” Runoff

1.0” Rainfall

1.1” Runoff

2.8” Rainfall

Water Budget

Land Use (Impervious %)0.5”

Runoff1.0”

Rainfall1.1”

Runoff2.8”

RainfallResidential (50%) 55.5% 67.3% 77.9% 97.0%Commercial (70%) 67.0% 80.5% 87.9% 98.0%Fully Developed (100%) 69.0% 81.7% 88.2% 97.9%

Annual Volume Reduction (%):

Water Budget

Land Use (Impervious %)No

Controls0.5”

Runoff1.0”

Rainfall1.1”

Runoff2.8”

Rainfall

Residential (50%) 0.59 0.26 0.19 0.13 0.02Commercial (70%) 1.31 0.43 0.26 0.16 0.03Fully Developed (100%) 1.82 0.56 0.33 0.21 0.04

Remaining Runoff After Implementing Volume Reduction Policies (acre-feet/acre):

Water BudgetWetland Water Losses:

Infiltration: (0.001 – 0.05 in/hr)

0.73 – 36.5 acre-feet/acre/year

Evaporation: (3 feet/year)

3.0 acre-feet/acre/year

Total: 3.73 – 39.5

acre-feet/acre/year

Water Budget

Land Use (Impervious %)No

Controls0.5”

Runoff1.0”

Rainfall1.1”

Runoff2.8”

Rainfall

Residential (50%) 6.3 14.3 19.4 28.7 211.5Commercial (70%) 2.8 8.6 14.6 23.5 141.9Fully Developed (100%) 2.1 6.6 11.2 17.4 97.7

To support 1 acre of wetland, how many acres of tributary area is required?

0.001 in/hr infiltration

Water Budget

Land Use (Impervious %)No

Controls0.5”

Runoff1.0”

Rainfall1.1”

Runoff2.8”

Rainfall

Residential (50%) 67.2 151.0 205.4 304.0 2239.2Commercial (70%) 30.1 91.1 154.2 248.4 1503.0Fully Developed (100%) 21.7 70.1 118.7 184.1 1034.6

To support 1 acre of wetland, how many acres of tributary area is required?

0.05 in/hr infiltration

Case Study

Drainage Area: 42 acresPre-development runoff (Ag.)

13.4 afPost-development runoff (50% Imp.)

0.5” Runoff: 11.0 af1.0” Rainfall: 8.0 af1.1” Runoff: 5.5 af2.8” Rainfall: 0.8 af

Case Study

Drainage Area: 42 acresPre-development runoff (Ag.)

13.4 afPost-development runoff (100% Imp.)

0.5” Runoff: 23.5 af1.0” Rainfall: 13.8 af1.1” Runoff: 8.8 af2.8” Rainfall: 1.7 af

Benefits of Volume Reduction Using Infiltration

Mimics natural water cycleRecharges groundwaterContributes clean base flow to nearby streamsProvides pollutant removalCan be a cost effective way to treat stormwaterMay be constructed underground to maximize

useable space onsiteCan incorporate native vegetation and treesMitigates temperature impacts

May contaminate groundwater or soilPotential for failure due to siltation and clogging over

timeCannot be used in soils with low permeabilityCost increases in areas with soils having low

infiltration ratesMay increase local subsurface water elevations

(basement flooding)Loss of hydrology to downstream lakes and

wetlands

Concerns about Volume Reduction Using Infiltration

Wetland Benefits

Habitat – Plants & AnimalsWater Quality – Filter & Clean RunoffGroundwater Recharge – Hold & Infiltrate RunoffFlood Protection – Store Water during Snow/Rain Events

????

??????

Do current volume reduction policies have the potential to undermine our efforts to protect

Minnesota’s wetlands?