time based competition

Upload: gayatrisatam

Post on 06-Apr-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    1/20

    Suhas Rane

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    2/20

    Concept that time is a resource and a firm thatmake better use of time (in responding to thechanging market situations and otherenvironmental conditions) acquires a

    competitive advantage.

    Time-based competition is the extension of JITinto every facet of the product delivery cycle,from research and development throughmarketing and distribution of the final product.

    The term was coined by the US consultant George Stalk, Jr., of BostonConsulting Group and popularized by his book 'Competing Against Time.

    Business Advantage

    Quality Cost

    Time

    DEFINITION

    ORIGIN

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    3/20

    Low Cost Products using MassProduction

    Low Cost Products through increased

    production efficiency

    Quality Improvements

    Lean Production and JIT

    Rapid development efforts and timebased competition

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    4/20

    Time BasedCompetition

    Fast to Market

    Product DevelopmentCycle Time

    New ProductInformation

    Fast to Product

    Production Lead Time Delivery Speed

    Results in:Market DominationAdvanced Learning CurveBarriers to Entry

    E.g.:Sun Microsystems

    Results in:Inventory ReductionCost ReductionRevenue Enhancement

    E.g.:Wal-Mart

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    5/20

    Source: Paper on TBC by Cecil Bozarth and Steve Chapman, NCSU

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    6/20

    Task overlapping in lieu of Phased Approach

    Process Oriented Approach instead of Functional Approach

    Coordination & Collaboration between supply chain partners

    Process Reengineering

    Continuous Improvement Efforts

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    7/20

    Understand need tochange

    Importance of supply responsiveness to customer

    D-time target that customer setTotal P-time

    Understand process

    Map whole process

    Find out activity time/wasted timeCompare the P-time and D-timeCompare total activity time and D-time

    Identify unnecessary process stepsand large amounts of wasted time

    Identify steps that do not add

    value to customer

    Identify large amounts of

    wasted time

    Understand thecauses of waste

    Identify the causes of unnecessary

    process steps and wasted time

    Change theprocess

    Choose solutions that will make

    the process more responsive

    Review changesEvaluation

    Adjustment

    Feedback

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    8/20

    Annual Contracts & VMI

    Quality materials to avoid quality checks

    On line ordering and replenishment

    Partnering for product development and rapidproduct introduction

    Sourcing

    Reducing manufacturing lead times

    Smaller batch size and low inventory levels

    Total productive maintenance

    Concurrent engineering

    SMED

    Manufacturing

    Cutting down on echelons in distribution network

    Outsourcing of logistic activities , Cross docking

    Real time information on stock levels andconsumption patterns

    Quick redressal of customer complain

    Distribution

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    9/20

    Simplified and more flexible organizations

    Lower development costs & shorter planning loops

    Simplified production control with higher efficiencies

    Rapid response enables companies to quickly redirecttheir value-delivery systems to the most attractivecustomers

    Increases market share through first-mover advantage

    Drives the Company to reengineer their businessprocesses right from the R&D to the Final Delivery

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    10/20

    Increased responsiveness to customer needs

    Managing increased variety

    Deliver a product orservice on time

    Deal with customerqueries and

    complaints on time

    High level ofresponsiveness to

    customer

    Customerloyalty

    Reducing overall lead-time

    Reducing product complexity

    Reducing process set-up time

    Production withmore frequency and

    smaller batches

    Increasedvariety ofproducts

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    11/20

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    12/20

    Time based competition through productdevelopment time reduction

    3M reduced its new product developmenttime from two years to two months

    Fuji Xerox (Japan) reduced its photocopierdevelopment time from four to two years

    Toyota achieved a new productdevelopment time two years shorter thanthat of the Big Three automakers

    Cincinnati Milacron met the onslaught offoreign competition in the injectionmoulding machine business by developinga better performing, lower cost machine innine months as compared to its historicalaverage of two years

    Time based competition throughmanufacturing lead time reduction

    Motorola's cellular phone was drasticallycut from several weeks to four hours.

    Toyota takes two days to produce a car,which is three days shorter than NorthAmerican manufacturers.

    Manufacturing lead time for Allen-Bradley's World contactors and relays is asingle day.

    Johnson and Johnson's Vistakon divisionhas the top selling contact lens in themarket largely due to its rapid (three daysor less) and reliable (99.99 per cent on-time) delivery of disposable contacts tocustomers.

    Source: Paper on TBC by Jayanth Jayaram, Shawnee K. Vickery, Cornelia Droge

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    13/20

    Time-Based Competition in Multistage Manufacturing:

    Stream-of-Variation Analysis (SOVA) MethodologyReview

    D. CEGLAREKW. HUANG

    S. ZHOUUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    14/20

    Shortening of product life cycle to 2-3 years in afew years time

    Large number of design changes during the

    design phase (6,000 changes on average for a newautomotive body development)

    Long ramp up time

    Low production yield

    The old assembly line cannot be entirely used for anew product

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    15/20

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    16/20

    In the last decade, the so-called stream of variation analysis (SOVA) methodologyhas been proposed and developed to overcome the aforementioned challenges.

    SOVA is a generic math model for variation propagation analysis in multistagemanufacturing systems.

    SOVA integrates multivariate statistics, control theory as well asdesign/manufacturing knowledge (CAD/CAM models) into a unified framework.

    The stream of variation analysis (SOVA or SoV) methodology is a genericsimulation engine for modelling, analysis, and performance prediction ofmultistage manufacturing processes

    Important in industries where product geometry and dimensional variation are ofcritical importance

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    17/20

    SOVA serves two objectives

    In the design phase, the SOVA can be used for analysis, prediction, andoptimization of manufacturing system performance following theconcept of FTRDesign.

    Given the process and tooling design information, SOVA can simulatethe variation propagating throughout the process and then predict thefinal product-dimensional variation and resultant product geometry.

    In the production ramp-up phase, SOVA can be used to identify and isolatefault rootcauses following the concept of FTRDiagnosis. SOVA candemonstrate high responsiveness in identifying and isolating root causesof dimensional variation

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    18/20

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    19/20

    Automotive body at the optical measurement station.

    Optical

    MeasurementSystems

  • 8/3/2019 Time Based Competition

    20/20