throwing shade: a qualitative study of …journal of student success and retention vol. 5, no. 1,...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
1
THROWINGSHADE:AQUALITATIVESTUDYOFMICROINEQUITIESANDLEARNINGENGAGEMENTWITHINHIGHEREDUCATION
JosieL.AndrewsUniversityofTennessee,Knoxville
Abstract
Basedoninterviewdatafromaqualitativestudy,thisarticlehighlightstheperspectivesof
fivestudentsfromanAmericaninstitutionofhighereducationtogetabetter
understandingofthewaysinwhichmicroinequitiesinfluencelearningengagement.Three
majorthemesemergedfromtheinterviewdata:(1)feelingofdisconnection,(2)surface
learning,and(3)student‐teacherrelationship.Usingasocialconstructivismframework,I
argueforagreaterunderstandingofmicroinequitiesinthesocialandsituationalcontextin
whichtheyoccur,specificallywithineducationalclimates.Implicationsforeducatorswill
bediscussed,includinghowtocreateinclusive,supportive,anddemocraticlearning
climatesforalllearners.
Keywords:students,biascommunication,highereducation,learningclimates,learning
engagement,microinequities
Introduction
Microinequitiesoccurineverydaylives(Brennan,2016;Nadal,2017;Rowe,2008,
Schnellmann&Gibbons,1984),includingthelivesofstudentswhoattendcollegesand
universitiesintheUnitedStates.Rowe(2008)coinedthetermmicroinequitywhile
conductinga1973studyoninclusionwithintheworkplaceattheMassachusettsInstitute
ofTechnology.Rowewritesthatmicroinequitiesare“apparentlysmalleventswhichare
oftenephemeralandhard‐to‐prove,eventswhicharecovert,oftenunintentional,
![Page 2: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
2
frequentlyunrecognizedbytheperpetrator,whichoccurwhereverpeopleareperceivedto
bedifferent”(p.1).SandlerandHall(1986)refertomicroinequitiesas“waysinwhich
individualsareeithersingledout,oroverlooked,ignored,orotherwisediscountedonthe
basisofunchangeablecharacteristicssuchassex,race,orage.”(p.3;emphasisinoriginal).
Sueetal.(2007)describemicroinequitiesas“thepatternofbeingoverlooked,
underrespected,anddevaluedbecauseofone’sraceorgender”(p.273).
Literatureshowsthatcontemporaryscholars(e.g.,Brennan,2016;Hutchison&
Jenkins,2013;Nadal,2017;Saporu&Herbers,2015)refertoRowe’sdefinitionintheir
scholarshiponmicroinequitiesintheworkplace.Unfortunately,thereisnoprecise
definitionofmicroinequitiesastheyrelatetolearningclimatesineducationalinstitutions.
Forthisstudy,theoriginaldefinitionwillsuffice.Furthermore,contemporaryterminology
(e.g.biascommunication,unconsciousbias,hiddenbias)willbeusedinterchangeablywith
thetermmicroinequity.
Basedoninterviewanalysesfromaqualitativeapproach,thisstudyhighlights
perceptionsofmicroinequitiestogetabetterunderstandingofwaysinwhichthese
unconsciousbiasescouldinfluencelearningengagementintheclassroom.Usingasocial
constructivismframework,Iargueforagreaterunderstandingofmicroinequitiesinthe
socialandsituationalcontextinwhichtheyoccur,specificallywithinclassroomclimates.I
alsoargueforfutureareasoftheory,research,andpracticetopotentiallyfindwaysto
minimizetheeffectsofmicroinequitiesineducationalandvocationallearningspaces.
Implicationswillbeprovidedforeducatorswhoarestrivingtocreateinclusive,supportive,
anddemocraticlearningclimates,aswellasincreaseretentionineducationallearning
spaces.
![Page 3: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
3
ResearchProblem
Rowe(2008)positsthatmicroinequitiesdonotrequireactiveintentiononthepart
oftheperpetrator;however,theaccumulationofunconsciousbiasesandprejudicescan
resultinexclusion,impairworkplaceorclassroomperformance,anddiminishself‐esteem
(SaporuandHerbers,2015).Muchoftheexistingliteratureonthecumulativeeffectsof
microinequitiespresentsindividuals’experienceswithinworkplacelearningspacesand
focusesprimarilyongenderandraceschemas(Brennan,2016;Hutchinson&Jenkins,
2013;Nadal,2017;Rowe2008;Sandler&Hall,1986;Saporu&Herbers,2015;Young
2006)andispredominantlyquantitativeinnature.Withrespecttoacademiclearning
spaces,therelativelysmallerandmostlydatedliteratureonmicroinequitiesandtheir
impactsonlearningengagementfocusesexclusivelyongender,race,andsexualorientation
schemas(Beagan,2001;Cranston1989;Sandler&Hall,1986;Schnellmann&Gibbons,
1984).Theliteraturealsoencompassespsychologicalorientations(Cranston&Leonard,
1990;Meadors&Murray,2014).Whencomparedtotheresearchonmicroinequities
withintheworkplacelearningclimates,researchwithinacademiclearningclimatesisalso
predominatelyquantitativeinnature.Fromaqualitativeapproach,weknowrelatively
littleabout(1)howmicroinequitiesinfluencelearningengagementintheclassroomand
(2)howstudentlearnerscopewiththeirexperiencesofmicroinequities.
ResearchPurpose
Thepurposeofthisstudywastoqualitativelyexplorestudents’experiencesof
microinequitiestogetabetterunderstandingofthewaysinwhichmicroinequities
![Page 4: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
4
influencelearningengagement.Twooverarchingresearchquestionsguidedthe
investigation:
1.Howdostudents’experiencesofmicroinequitiesinfluencelearningengagement
inhighereducation?
2.Inwhatwaysdostudentscopewiththeexperiencesofmicroinequitiesinhigher
education?
LiteratureReview
Thefollowingsectionsintroduceanddiscussthethreespecificareas:learning
engagementinlearningspaces,perception,andcommunication,astheyrelatetothe
understandingofmicroinequitiesintheclassroom.
LearningEngagement
Democracyandinclusionpromotesafelearningclimateswithinadultandhigher
educationalinstitutions(Andrews&Misawa,2017;Williams,Woodson,&Wallace,2016).
Williamsetal.(2016)assertthatlearningspacesthatpromotesafelearningclimateshave
thepotentialtofosterengagementandexplorationofcreativity.Engagement,operationally
speaking,isdifficulttodefine;however,itisobviousbothwhenpresentandwhenmissing
(Saeed&Zyngier,2012).Engagement,Kuh(2009)states,isthequalityofeffortand
participationwhichlearnersemployinrealisticlearningactivities.Schlechty(2002,as
citedinSaeed&Zyngier,2012)adds:
Engagementisactive.Itrequiresthestudentstobeattentiveaswellasinattendance;
itrequiresthestudentstobecommittedtothetaskandfindsomeinherentvaluein
what he or she is being asked to do. The engaged student not only does the task
assignedbutalsodoesthetaskwithenthusiasmanddiligence.(p.255)
![Page 5: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
5
Unfortunately,whensubtleeffectsofmicroinequitiesimpedeengagementwithina
learningsetting,alearnercouldfeelasenseofisolation,marginalization,andexclusion
(Brennan,2016;Nadal,2017).Theaccumulationofdisparagingcomments,unintentional
acts,orinvalidationswithinlearningspacescreatesexclusion,impairsworkplaceor
classroomperformance,anddiminishesself‐esteem(Saporu&Herbers,2015).When
consideringlearninginanysetting,theaccumulationsofbiascommunicationcanhave
psychologicalandphysicaleffects,includingsadness,lossofcreativityandengagement,
andlowworkperformance(Nadal,2017).Nadaladdsthattheeffectsofunconsciousbias
canalsoleadtohighturnover,lowmorale,anddecreasedproductivitywithinthe
workplace.
Kahu(2013)believesthatunderstandingthemagnitudeofengagementandits
impactonacademicsinhighereducationrequiresapsychologicalapproach.Shesuggests
thatateachercanframelearners’engagementbyconsideringbehavior,cognition,and
emotionaldimensionsoflearning.Kahu’spsychologicalperspectiveonlearningisnota
newconcept;however,itcorroboratesForgas’(2000)philosophythatfeelingandthinking
areinterconnecteddomainsandcannotbeseparatefromthelearningprocess.Kahu’s
psychologicalapproachtoengagementalsosupportsIlleris’(2002)viewpointthatthe
learningencompassesthecognitive,affective,andsocialdimensions.Itshouldbenoted
thatinlaterworksIllerischangedthesetermstocontent,incentive,andenvironment.
However,hisoriginaltermshavebeenmaintainedinthissectionbecausetheyaresimple
andrelevanttothecontentofthisarticle.Despitethechangeofterminology,Illeris(2017)
maintains,inhissecondeditionofHowWeLearn:LearningandNon‐FormalinSchooland
![Page 6: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
6
Beyond,that“alllearninginvolvesthesethreedimensions,whichmustalwaysbe
consideredifanunderstandingoranalysisofalearningsituationistobeadequate”(p.24).
Perception
Microinequitieslieintheeyesofthebeholder;therefore,theperceptionsof
microinequitiesmakeithardtorecognizeorprove,especiallywhenthereareother
reasonableexplanations(Chun&Evan,2015;Rowe,2008).Becauseoftheconstructionof
reality,ChunandEvan(2015)claimthatperceptionsofmicroinequitiesallowthe
individualtobecometheexpertonwhatconstitutesamicroinequity.Individualswho
experienced,orperceivedthattheyhaveexperienced,microinequitiesinlearningspaces
describedanambiguoussenseofdisrespect,insult,orslight(Brennan,2016;Hutchinson&
Jenkins,2013).
Althoughresearchindicatesthatperceptionisnotanaccuratereflectionofreality,
SchnellmannandGibbons(1984)disagree.In1984,theseresearchersconducteda
quantitativestudytodeterminewhetherwomenandotherminoritystudentsperceiveda
lessencouragingclassroomclimatethantheirwhitemalecounterparts.Schnellmannand
Gibbons’findingsindicatethatanindividual’sperceptionofrealityinformshisorher
beliefsandbehaviors.Kiraly(2014)addsthatindividualsperceiveandunderstandtheir
realitythroughtheirownpositionalitywithinthesocialcontext.Thesestatements
emphasize(1)thatrealityisconstructedthroughsocialinteractionwithone’s
environment,and(2)theexperienceoflearninghasanemotionalaspect.Unintentional
exclusionarypractices,suchasmicroinequities,canemotionallyinfluencelearners’
attitudesandbehaviors(Chun&Evan,2015)towardlearning,includingloweringacademic
aspirationsandachievements,decreasingself‐efficacy,anddecreasingmotivation.
![Page 7: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
7
Communication
Communication,bothverbalandnon‐verbal,issalienttoanyenvironmentwhere
learningexperiencesoccur(e.g.,Churches,2010;Knapp,Hall,&Horgan,2014).Literature
oncommunicationoftencitesearlierresearchfromAlfredMehrabian(1968),who
maintainsthatcommunicationiscomprisedof93%non‐verbaland7%verbal.Verbal
communicationtendstoplaceemphasisonthecognitivefacetsofinterpersonal
interactions(McCroskey,Richmond,&Bennett,2006;Meadors&Murray,2014;).
Unlikeverbalcommunication,non‐verbalcommunicationplaysamoreemotionalor
affectiveroleinsendingandreceivingmessages(Knappetal.,2014;McCroskeyetal.,
2006;Meadors&Murray,2014).Churches(2010)positsthattheemotionalclimateofthe
learningspaceinfluenceslearnersjustasmuchastheeffectivenessofthecurriculum.
Morreale,Spitzberg,andBarge(2007)definenon‐verbalcommunicationasanyhuman
behaviors,objectsorcharacteristicsthatconveyamessage–otherthanwords.Non‐verbal
communicationincludesfacialexpression,eyecontact,bodyposition,gesture,pitchand
toneofvoice,personaldistance,attentivesilence,andtouch(Bambaeeroo&Shokrpour,
2017;Baron,2009).
Non‐verbalelementsofcommunicationcanemphasize,distractfrom,orcontradict
averbalmessage(DeLamater&Myers,2011;Meadors&Murray,2014).Whenthereisa
discrepancybetweenverbalandnon‐verbalcommunication,individualswillrespondmore
frequentlytothenon‐verbalcommunication(Churches,2010;DeLamater&Myers,2011;
Meadors&Murray,2014;Mehrabian,2009).Okon(2011)contendsiftheincongruityisnot
resolved,itcouldpossiblysetthetonefortheescalationofconflict.Lincoln(2002)
![Page 8: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
8
describeshowconflictcouldoccurwhenanindividualperceivesthattheverbalmessage
thatisbeingdeliveredisnotgenuineorcontradictthenon‐verbalbehaviors.
Quantitativefindingsimplythattherearecorrelationsbetweenteachers’verbaland
non‐verbalbehaviorsaswellasstudents’achievementandgoodbehaviorandstudents’
learningandmotivation(Bambaeeroo&Shokrpour,2017).In1982,HallandSandler
noted:
[N]onverbalbehaviorscansignalinclusionorexclusionofgroupmembers;indicate
interestandattentionortheopposite;communicateexpectationsofstudentsuccess
orfailure;andfosterorimpedestudents’confidenceintheirownabilitiestolearn
specifictasksandprocedures.(p.6)
Over35yearslater,thisstatementcontinuestoconveytheimportanceofunderstanding
non‐verbalcommunicationandaddscredibilitytotheconceptthatifthenon‐verbal
communicationisperceivedtobeahiddenbias,thenitcouldpossiblyhaveanadverse
effectonastudent’sengagementwithinlearningclimates.
SocialConstructivismFramework
JohnDewey(1916),perhapsoneoftheprominenteducationalscholarsof
thetwentiethcentury,believedthateducationisnotabouttellingbutaboutdoing.Dewey
andmanyothersocialconstructivistshaveresearched,theorized,andpracticedthe
conceptthatlearningisconstructedthroughsocialinteractionandconcludedthatdoing
andknowingcannotbetreatedseparately(Bandura,1977,Beck&Kosnik,2006;Bruner
1986;Burr,2015;Vygotsky,2012;Piaget,2013).Socialconstructivismparadigmwas
chosenbecauseofitsepistemologicalassumptionsaboutthenatureofknowledgeandhow
individualswithinaspecificsocialcontextcanconstructvariousrealities.
![Page 9: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
9
Socialconstructivistsacknowledgethatlearningprocessesoccurinternallyinan
individual;however,theyconsideritminusculebecausethenatureandcontentoflearning
processesaredeterminedbysocialcontext,inwhichindividualsunderstandandinterpret
theirexperiencesintheworld(Burr,2015;Illeris,2017).Perhapsonecanconcludethat
vastinterpretationsofexperiencesbegetmultiplerealities.Reality,asitrelatestosocial
constructivism,hasmultiplerealitiesdependingone’ssocialandsocietalpositionsinthe
world(Jonassen,Myers,&McKillop,1996).Multiplerealties,basedoncultureandsocial
facets,areperhapsamongthemostsalientattributesofconstructivists’paradigm(Kiraly,
2014).
ResearcherReflection
AsanAfrican‐Americanfemalegraduatestudentinhighereducation,Ihave
experiencedorperceivedthatIhadexperiencedsomeformsofmicroinequitieswithinthe
classroom.Therefore,myknowledgeofexistingmicroinequitiesliteratureinformedmy
preconceptions.Attheinceptionofthisqualitativeinvestigation,Ibelievedthat(a)subtle
formsofbiascommunicationexistedinthecultureofhighereducation(b)adultlearners
interpretedtheirperceptionsofmicroinequitiesindiverseways,and(c)perceptionsof
microinequitiescouldcontributetonegativedevelopmental,psychological,andsocial
outcomes.IacknowledgethattheseperspectiveslikelyinfluencedthemethodsthatIused
andmyinterpretationofthecollecteddata.Consideringmysubjectivityasitrelatestothis
researchtopic,Ihopethatmyparticipationinthisconversationwilladdavoiceto
understandingandcombatingmicroinequitiesinlearningspaces.
![Page 10: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
10
ResearchDesign
Toexploretheconceptofmicroinequitiesastheyrelatetostudents’learning
engagement,aqualitativeapproachwasusedtoexploretheexperiencesoffivestudents
withinanAmericaninstitutionofhighereducation.BogdanandBiklen(2012)suggestthat
aqualitativeapproachtoresearchprovidesresearcherswiththeopportunityto
understandwaysinwhichpeoplemakesenseoftheirlives.Theauthorsalsonotethat
qualitativeresearchers“seektograsptheprocessbywhichpeopleconstructmeaningand
todescribewhatthosemeaningsare”(p.48).
ParticipantsandDataCollection
ParticipantswererecruitedfromtheCollegeofEducationwithintheUniversityof
PNY(pseudonym),apublicuniversitylocatedintheSoutheasternregionoftheUnited
States.Thesampleforthisstudyconsistedoffiveparticipants:Amy,Henry,Stacy,Luke,
andNancy.Thecriteriaforthestudyparticipantsincluded(a)be19yearsofageorolder,
(b)beanactivestudentwithintheCollegeofEducation,and(c)demonstratethe
willingnessandavailabilitytoparticipate.
DataCollectionandAnalysis
Ingeneral,interviewsareconsideredoneofthemostcommonresearchtoolsin
qualitativeresearchthatbuildsaholisticsnapshot,analyzeswords,andreportsdetailed
viewsofinformants(Edward&Hollands,2013).Spradley(2016)pointsoutthat
interviewsareconsideredaseriesoffriendlyconversations.Inordertosetsome
parametersforthesefriendlyconversations,asemi‐structuredinterviewguidewasusedto
maximizeflexibilityduringtheinterviewprocess.Eachparticipantvoluntaryparticipated
![Page 11: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
11
inaface‐to‐faceaudio‐recordedinterviewsessionthatlasted45‐70minutesinlengthand
consistedofopen‐endedquestions.
Priortothebeginningoftheaudio‐recordedinterviewsession,eachparticipantwas
providedaninformedconsentformthatprovidedthestudyobjectives,procedures,
duration,risks,benefits,confidentialityofrecords,contactinformationforanyquestions
regardingtheresearchstudy.Aftertheparticipantssignedandconsentedtoparticipatein
theresearchstudy,theywereensuredofcompleteanonymityandconfidentiality.Inan
efforttoprovideanonymityandconfidentiality,allidentifyingmarkerswereremovedfrom
thedatacollectionandnoinformationwasquotedinawaythatwouldleadtothe
participants’identification.Inanattempttoavoidinaccuraciesormisrepresentationsof
data,aface‐to‐facemeetingwasheldwitheachparticipanttogivehimorheran
opportunitytomembercheckhisorhertranscribednarrative.
Aftertranscribingtheinterviewsverbatim,Iusedathematicanalysistechniqueto
code,categorize,andthemepatternsthatwerecommontoallparticipants(Guest,
MacQueen,&Namey,2012).Initially,opencodingwasusetoreadandre‐readparticipants’
wordstogeneratecodesofinformation.Opencodingprovidedmetheopportunityto
organizethedatainto“chunks”(Rossman&Rallis,2016).Next,thecodeswereorganized
intosimilarcategories.Finally,therelatedcategorieswereusedtocreatethemes,which
wereusedtoprovidedescriptionsofthestudents’experiencesofmicroinequitiesand
copingstrategies.
Findings
Threemajorthemeswereidentifiedusingthethematicanalysisprocessdescribed
intheprevioussection:(1)feelingofdisconnection,(2)surfacelearning,and(3)student‐
![Page 12: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
12
teacherrelationship.Eachmajorthemeisdefinedandexplainedinthefollowingsections,
alongwithquotestodemonstratethemeaningandsignificanceofthefindings.
FeelingofDisconnection
Inthisstudy,thefeelingofdisconnectionisdepictedasawayinwhichparticipants
viewedtheirconnectionwithbothhisorherinstructorandlearningprocess.Afeelingof
disconnectionhindersaperson’sabilitytoactivelyengageinactivities,suchasthose
withinaclassroom.Theinabilitytobeactivelyengagedinactivitiesisrelatedtointrinsic
motivation(Niemiec&Ryan,2009).Theseauthorsassertthatwhenindividualsare
intrinsicallymotivatedtheyexploreandengageinacademicactivities.However,under
certainconditions(e.g.theexperiencesofmicroinequities),theintrinsicmotivationof
activeparticipationandengagementinaneducationalclimatecanbereplacedwiththe
experienceofisolationandalienation(Niemiec&Ryan,2009).
Henrydescribedhisfeelingofdisconnectionasthelackofacknowledgmentinthe
classroom.Heexpressed:
Ifeelit’simportantthattheteacherknowsthatpersoninhisorherclassroom,itshowscareorconcernthatyou’reintheirclassroom.Apersonfeelsmoreobligatedtolearniftheyfeel‘okay,she’sgoingtocallonme,she’sgoingtocallmyname.’Iftheyshoweyecontact,knowalloftheirstudents’names,callonalltheirstudentseveryonceandawhile,itshowsthatpossiblyhecares,orshecares.Itshowsarelationshipmoresothanwe’rejustanumbersittingoverthere…justanotherpartofthatfurnituresittingintheclassroom.
Henrycontinuedtoexplainthathiseducator’sverbalandnon‐verbalcommunication
createdanatmospherethatmadehimfeelnotonlyadisconnectionbutasenseof
ambiguity.Hestated:
Andyouwerealwaysunsureaboutwhatthisparticularprofessormeant.Theattitudeinwhichsherespondedtome.It[attitude]madeitveryhardtopayattentionortolistenandIwasalwayswondering‘okay’isitme.
![Page 13: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
13
Scarlett(2015)statesthatstudentswhofeeladisconnectionbecomeisolatedfrom
thelearningprocess.Theauthorcontinuestopointoutthatthefeelingofisolation
becomesachallengebecauseitinhibitsmanythings(e.g.,participation,collaboration,
motivation)thataresalientforsuccessinalearningsetting,includingactivelearning
engagement.Thefeelingofisolationcanalsocreatealessencouragingclassroomclimate
duetodifferentialtreatment(Scarlett,2015;Schnellmann&Gibbons,1984).Luke’sfeeling
ofdisconnectionwasrelatedtohisperceivedexperienceofdifferentialtreatment.He
responded:
She[theinstructor]engagedmorewithacertaingroupintheclass.Shefocusedallherattentiononthemtothepointtowhereitcausedtherestoftheclasstodisengagetoacertaindegreeortoalotofdegree.Peoplewilldisengageiftheyfeelthattheirpresenceisnotwarranted.IhavedisengagedtoacertaindegreeandwhenIdid,itshowedinmywork.
Unfortunately,thosestudentswhoexperiencedasenseofdisconnectionfeltisolatedand
alienatedfromthefaculty,staff,institution,andpeers(Kahu&Nelson,2018;Strayhorn,
2012).Disconnectioncanbecomeproblematicforstudentsbecauseitalsoencourages
disengagementandinhibitsacademicsuccess.
Thefeelingofdisconnectiondemonstratestheparticipants’desiretohaveapositive
interpersonalconnection,specificallywiththeinstructor.Literatureimpliesthatapositive
interpersonalconnectionbuildsasenseofbelonging(Baumeister&Leary,1995;Kahu&
Nelson,2018).Theneedforbelongingisabasichumanneed(Kahu&Nelson,2018;
Maslow,1943;Strayhorn,2012).Withinanacademicclimate,theneedofbelongingisthe
learner’sconnectednesstotheinstitution,facultyandstaff,aswellashisorherpeers
(Baumeister&Leary,1995;Kahu&Nelson,2018).Belonging,Strayhorn(2012)notes,isan
![Page 14: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
14
essentialfactorthatcontributestowhathedescribesas“realconsequences”likeacademic
successandstudentattrition(p.x;emphasisinoriginal).
In2017,theNationalSurveyofStudentEngagementconductedastudyand
revealedthatstudentswhoparticipateinaclassroomthatpracticesinclusivityhavea
greateropportunityto(1)enhancetheirhigher‐orderthinking,(2)engageininteractive
learning,(3)andhavepositiveperceptionsofsupport(e.g.,faculty,staff,peers).Empirical
andtheoreticalstudiesgivecredibilitytotheideologiesthatasenseofbelongingwithinan
inclusivelearningenvironmentincreasesacademicself‐efficacy,improvesparticipationin
thelearningprocess,andincreasesintrinsicmotivation(Freeman,Anderman,&Jensen,
2010).
SurfaceLearning
Thesecondthemetoemergefromthestudywassurfacelearning.Inthispresent
research,participantsperceivedthatthenegativeeffectsofbiascommunicationof
microinequitiescreatedsurfacelearning,whichisasuperficialapproachtolearningthat
impliesthatastudentmemorizesfactsandlearnsjustenoughtopassthecourse(Biggs,
2001;Everaert,Opdecam,&Maussen,2017;Howie&Bagnall,2013;Lucas,2001).A
surfacelearningapproachisanattemptinwhichastudentputsforthminimumeffortto
avoidacademicfailure,whichoftenleadstoloweracademicperformance.Furthermore,
Everaertetal.(2017).conductedastudyandconcludedthatthereisacorrelationbetween
surfacelearningapproachandnegativeacademicperformance.Thestudyalsorevealeda
relationbetweendeeplearningapproachandpositiveacademicperformance.
Choosingthesurfacelearningapproachisnotalearner’scharacteristicbuta
responsetohowalearnerperceivesthelearningclimate(Everaertetal.,2017;Lucas,
![Page 15: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
15
2001).GarrisonandCleveland‐Innes(2005)addthatsomestudentsengageinthesurface
learningapproachbecauseofthesocialandsituationalcontextofthelearning
environment.Inthiscurrentstudy,Lukedescribedhisexperiencesofmicroinequitiesand
howthesesubtlebiasesimpactedhisperceptionofinstructorsandapproachtolearning.
Lukestated:
IwenttoaprivatehighschoolandImadegoodgradesbecauseteachersputinalotofeffortwiththeirpupilsatthetime.Hereat[UniversityofPNY],theteachersdonotvaluestudents’success.Istartedmissingclass.Ifeltlikemypresencewasnotmissed.So,Iwouldshowupandjustuh‘wingit.’Ishowupforjustenoughsessionstopasstheclasswith,youknow,withthebareminimal.Aspreviouslymentioned,astudent’sperceptionofthelearningenvironment(e.g.
socialinteraction,communication,senseofbelonging)playsasignificantroleinhisorher
approachtolearning(DeLotell,Millam,&Reinhardt,2010;Garrison&Cleveland‐Innes,
2005;Lucas,2001).Infact,DeLotelletal.(2010)implythattheeducatorisatthecenterof
thestudent’slearningexperience;therefore,theeducatorisinthepositiontofostera
positiveornegativeperceptionofthelearningclimate.Anexampleofhowaneducatorcan
influenceastudent’sperceptionisdemonstratedthroughNancy’slearningexperience.She
explained:
AlthoughIhaveanAintheclass,herbehaviorandnonchalantattitudeaffectsmebecauseIstilldon’tunderstandhalfofthethings.So,I’maffectedbythewayshejustbrushesitoffandIstillhavetogettutoringontheside.Sheisnotgoingtostayafterclassandhelpwiththematerial,sometimesshemightbutitdependsonher…dependingonwhatdayitis.Despitethelackofencouragementandsupportfromtheeducator,Nancy
demonstratedacommitmenttoheracademicsuccesswithintheclassroombyseeking
assistanceforatutor.Inthisinstance,thestudent’sperceptionofthelearningenvironment
didnotlowerheracademicperformancebutperhapscreatedanegativeandunsupportive
![Page 16: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
16
relationshipwiththeeducator,whichgivesweighttopriorresearchthatimplieslearningis
influencedbysocialinteraction(Garrison&Cleveland‐Innes,2005;Illeris,2017).
Student‐TeacherRelationship
Thethoughtthatsocialandsituationalcontextofthelearningenvironment
influencescertainaspectsoflearningencompassesthelasttheme:student‐teacher
relationship.Inthispresentresearch,student‐teacherrelationshipisdefined“asthe
generalizedinterpersonalmeaningstudentsandteachersattachtotheirinteractionswith
eachother”(Wubbelsetal.,2014,p.364).Empiricalandtheoreticalresearchindicatethat
thequalityofteacher‐studentrelationshipshasamajorimpactonlearningacquisitionand
collegecompletion(Hoffman,2014),aswellasengagement,studentachievement,and
studentsatisfaction(hook,2003;Rowan&Grootenboer,2017.)Scholars(e.g.,hook;Rowan
&Grootenboer)pointoutthatthefundamentalresponsibilitiesofaneducatoraretocreate
alearningclimatethatfostersmutualrespectandtoencouragetheco‐constructionof
knowledgebetweenthestudentandtheeducator.Infact,aclassroomshouldbe“aplace
thatislife‐sustainingandmind‐expanding,aplaceofliberatingmutualitywhereteacher
andstudenttogetherworkinpartnership”(hook,2003,p.xv).
Despitetheimplicationsofpositiveoutcomesofthesestudent‐teacher
relationships,negativestudent‐teacherrelationshipshavebecomemorefrequentinhigher
education,particularlywheneducatorsengageinharmfulbehaviors(Hoffman,2014).
Wheneducatorsdisplaymicroinequitieswithinthelearningspace,anegativestudent‐
teacherrelationshipcouldensuecausingthestudenttobecomepassiveandlesslikelyto
activelyparticipateinthelearningprocess(Wentzel&Ramani,2016).Anegative
![Page 17: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
17
relationshipcanalsocausethestudenttosufferpsychologicaldilemmas,developdistrust,
andexperiencealossofself‐esteem(Sueetal.,2007).Inthiscurrentstudy,Amycandidly
spokeabouthernegativestudent‐teacherrelationshipbetweenherandherprofessor.She
indicatedthatherprofessor“throwsalotofshade.”“Throwingshade”isacolloquial
expressionusedtoverballyinsultorexpresscontemptforsomeone(Huba&Kronberg,
2016).Sheexplained:
He“throwsalotofshade.”[and]youjustdon’twanttobeinteractivewithhim.Idon’tfeelcomfortableaskinghimanythingaboutthecourseworkbecausehelaughsandmakesjokes.He’sjokingaroundandlaughing“girlgoneon,”“you’llgetit”youknowsomethinglikethat.He’soneofthose,youjustwriteitdownandjustgohead,youknow.
Thesocialandsituationalcontextsinwhichstudent‐teacherinteractionsoccurhave
anoteworthyinfluenceonthetypeofrelationshipsthatdevelopsbetweenthetwoparties
(Hoffman,2014).Hoffman(2014)suggeststhatnegativerelationshipsbetweenstudents
andteachers,asdemonstratedabove,aredetrimentaltoacademicsuccessbecausethey
diminishself‐esteem,causedisengagementfromclassroomactivity,andcontributetothe
failureofnotfinishingthecourse.Despitethesedisadvantageouseffectsofnegative
interpersonalrelationships,thevastliteratureonstudent‐teacherconnectionsshowsthat
positiveinteractionsbetweenstudentsandteacherscanincreasestudentmotivationand
academicsuccess,aswellasencouragecollegepersistence(Hoffman,2014;Rowan&
Grootenboer,2017;Wubbelsetal.,2014).
Limitations
Therearesomelimitationstothiscurrentstudy.Theresearchinquiryfocused
primarilyonmicroinequitiesanditsimpactsonlearningengagementinface‐to‐face
educationalinstitutions.Duetothislimitation,otherlearningspaces,suchasworkplace
![Page 18: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
18
andonlinelearning,wereexcluded.Theresearchalsofocusedspecificallyonstudents
withintheCollegeofEducationofaninstitutionofhigherlearningintheUnitedStates.
Althoughthestudents’experiencesinthiscurrentstudycannotbegeneralizedtoother
CollegesofEducation,theiruniquepositionsgiveanaturalisticgeneralization(Chenail,
2010;Stake,2005).
Discussion
Thispresentstudywasdesignedtogetabetterunderstandingofthewaysinwhich
biascommunicationcouldinfluencelearningengagementintheclassroom.Areviewofthe
literatureonmicroinequitiesfoundthattheaccumulationoftheseinvalidationsmaycreate
alearningclimate,wherethestudentmayfeel“humiliationandsocialrejection”(Nadal,
2017,p.681).Inaddition,areviewoftheliteratureindicatesthatmicroinequitiescould
impedeastudent’slearningengagementintheclassroom(Brennan,2016),perceptionof
realityisconstructedthroughanindividual’spositionalityintheirsocialcontext(Kiraly,
2014),andnegativecommunicationcouldhaveanadverseimpactonthelearner’sfeeling
ofbelonging,confidence,andachievementinthelearningspace(Bambaeeroo&
Shokrpour,2017).
Thepurposeofthisstudywastoqualitativelyexplorestudents’experiencesof
microinequitiestogetabetterunderstandingofthewaysinwhichmicroinequities
influencelearningengagement.Thisstudyrevealedthat(1)afeelingofdisconnection,(2)
surfaceapproachtolearning,and(3)anegativestudent‐to‐teacherrelationshipareways
inwhichmicroinequitiesinfluencelearningengagementinhighereducation.These
findingsalsosupporttheideologieswithintheliteraturethattheaccumulationof
microinequitiescancreateexclusion,impairperformanceinlearningclimates,increasethe
![Page 19: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
19
feelingofdiscouragement,andperpetuateasenseofdisrespect,insult,orslight(Brennan,
2016;Sandler&Hall,1986).
Understandingmicroinequitiesandtheirimpactonstudents’learningengagement
showedthatstudentsusedavoidancetocopewiththeexperiencesofmicroinequities.In
thisstudy,eachparticipantusedavoidanceasacopingstrategy.Scholars(e.g.,Brennan,
2016;Hutchinson&Jenkins,2013)pointoutthattargetsofmicroinequitiesdolittlewhen
facedwiththebehaviorsofmicroinequitiesbecauseofthefearofretaliation,thelackof
institutionalsupport,andattributionalambiguity.Withrespecttothelatter,Sue(2010)
describesattributionalambiguityasa“motivationaluncertaintyinthatthemotivesand
meaningofaperson’sactionsareunclearandhazy”(p.17).Theperceptionsof
microinequitiesmakeithardtorecognizeorprove,especiallywhenthereareother
reasonableexplanations,whichoftenleadstheindividualtodismisstheexperienceorself‐
blame(Chun&Evan,2015;Rowe,2008).
Implications
Theminutenatureofmicroinequitiescreatesachallengeforeducatorswhoteachat
institutionsofhigherlearning(Nadal,2017;Saporu&Herbers,2015)becausethese
behaviorsaresubtle,hard‐to‐prove,unintentional,andoftenhavevaguemeanings.So,the
questionishowdoeducatorsandacademicinstitutionsmoveforwardinorderto
minimizemicroinequitieswhilecreatingmoreinclusive,supportive,anddemocratic
learningclimatesthatsupportacademicsuccess?Thefollowingsectionshighlight
participatingindirectcommunication,implementingorganizationpoliciesandprocedures,
andattending/conductingcivilitytrainingandworkshops,andbuildingstudent‐teacher
![Page 20: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
20
relationshipsaspragmaticstrategiestocreatesafer,moredemocratic,andinclusive
learningenvironments.
DirectCommunication
Directcommunicationisperhapsthemosteffectivewaytoaddressmicroinequities
intheclassroom(Rowe,2008;Sueetal.,2007;Nadal,2017).Sueetal.mention,makethe
invisiblevisibleandprovideopportunityforeducatorstocreateasafeenvironmentwhere
alllearnerscanfeelsafewithouthavingthefearofbeingexcludedfromthelearning
process.Toraiseawarenessaboutmicroinequities,facultycancommunicateappropriate
socialandinterpersonalbehavioralexpectationsduringface‐to‐faceconversationsaswell
asintheirsyllabus(Morrissette,2001).Tofurtherreducemicroinequitieswithinthe
academy,theinstitutioncanraiseawarenessofmicroinequitiesbydevelopingand
executingacampuscivilitystatementandcivilityinitiatives(Freedman&Vreven,2017).
Implementationofclass‐levelororganizationpolicy/procedures
Itissalientthatinstitutionsofhigherlearningdeveloporreviseprogramsand
policiestoreduceandultimatelyeliminateuncivilbehaviors,suchasmicroinequities(Reio
&Ghosh,2009).Theauthorsrecommendthatthedevelopmentandimplementationof
class‐levelandorganization‐levelpoliciesstateandoutlineaclearandpreciseprotocolfor
confidentialreportingofuncivilbehaviors,andperhapsestablishmildtoseverepenalties
fortheperpetrators.
CivilityTraining
Anotherstrategytoraiseawarenessofuncivilbehaviors,suchasmicroinequities,
onAmericancollegeanduniversitiescampusesiscivilitytraining.Tobeeffective,civility
trainingshouldaddressdefiningcivilityandwhyitisimportant(Freedman&Vreven,
![Page 21: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
21
2017).Theauthorsaddthatcivilitytrainingshouldalsoaddresspoliteness,diversity
awareness,andculturalsensitivity(Wright&Hill,2015).WrightandHillconcludethat
civilitytrainingreinforcesorganizationalpoliciesonuncivilbehaviorsinacademic
classroomsanditsconsequencesforfaculty,students,andadministrators.
BuildingStudent‐TeacherRelationship
Inthiscurrentstudy,students’experiencesdemonstratehowbiascommunication,
verbalandnon‐verbal,affectsinterpersonalinteractionsandthelearner’sengagement.
Researchindicatesthatactsofmicroinequities(e.g.,ridicule,exclusion)exhibitedby
educatorstowardcertainstudentscanleadtoafeelingofincompetence,adecreasein
intrinsicmotivation(Brennan,2016;Nadal,2017),andfeelingofdisconnection(Strayhorn,
2012).Perhapsonewayofenhancingthestudent’sacademicsuccessisfosteringstudent
connectednessthroughbuildingapositivestudent‐teacherrelationship.In2017,Brown
andStarrettconductedanempiricalstudyonstudents’perceptionofconnectednessandits
impactoftheiracademicsuccess.Thestudyrevealedthreereasonswhyconnectednessis
salienttoacademicperformance:(1)increasesmotivation,(2)improvesretention,and(3)
fostersself‐efficacy.Mostimportantly,theresultsrevealedthat94%ofstudentsperceived
thatconnectednessorasenseofbelongingimprovedtheireducationalperformance.
Conclusion
Microinequitiesaresmall,subtle,unintentional,andhard‐to‐proveinsultsorslights
(Rowe,2008)withdevastatingimplicationsforastudent’slearningengagementand
academicsuccessinAmericanhighereducation,includingfeelingofdisconnected,
participatinginsurfacelearning,anddealingwithnegativestudent‐teacherrelationships.
Learningtoeffectivelycommunicatewithstudents,implementingclass‐levelcivility
![Page 22: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
22
policies,attendingcivilitytraining,anddevelopingpositivestudent‐teacherrelationships
willhelpeducatorstopromoteacivilityculturethatisinclusive,supportive,and
democraticforalllearners.
![Page 23: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
23
References
Andrews,J.L.&Misawa,M.(2017).Subtlebias:Exploringthecharacteristicsof
microaggressionsinadultandhighereducation.InM.Misawa(Ed.).Justiceforall:
Practicinganti‐bullyingandanti‐violenceeducationtocreatecivilenvironmentsfor
adultlearners.ProceedingsoftheSecondBullying,Incivility,andViolenceinAdult,
Higher,Continuing,andProfessionalEducationPre‐Conference(pp.28‐36).
Norman,OK.[Paperversion]
Bambaeeroo,F.,&Shokrpour,N.(2017).Theimpactoftheteachers’non‐verbal
communicationonsuccessinteaching.JournalofAdvancesinMedicalEducation&
Professionalism,5(2),51–59.
Bandura,A.(1977).Sociallearningtheory.EnglewoodCliffs,NJ:PrenticeHall.
Baron,R.A.(2009).Socialperception.SocialPsychology,12,79‐109.
Baumeister,R.F.,&Leary,M.R.(1995).Theneedtobelong:Desireforinterpersonal
attachmentsasafundamentalhumanmotivation.PsychologicalBulletin,117,497‐
529
Beagan,B.(2001).MicroInequitiesandeverydayinequities:“Race,”gender,sexuality,and
classinmedicalschool.CanadianJournalofSociology,26(4),583‐610.doi:
10.2307/3341493
Beck,C.,&Kosnik,C.(2006).Innovationsinteacher’seducation:Asocialconstructivists
approach.Albany,NY:StateUniversityofNewYorkPress.
Biggs,J.(2001).Enhancinglearning:Amatterofstyleorapproach?InR.J.Sternberg&L.
Zhang(Eds.),Perspectivesonthinking,learning,andcognitivestyles(pp.73–102).
Mahway,NJ:Erlbaum.
![Page 24: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
24
Bogdan,R.C.,&Biklen,S.K.(2012).Qualitativeresearchforeducation:Anintroductionto
theoriesandmethods(4thed.).NewYork,NY:PearsonEducation
Brennan,S.(2016).Themoralstatusofmicro‐inequities:Infavorofinstitutionsolutions.In
M.Brownstein&J.Saul(Eds.).Implicitbiasandphilosophy:MoralResponsibility,
injustice,andethics(pp.235‐253).(Vol.2).NewYork,NY:OxfordUniversityPress.
Brown,M.M.,&Starrett,T.(2017,April7).Fosteringstudentconnectedness:Building
relationshipsintheclassroom.Retrievedfrom
https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching‐and‐learning/fostering‐student‐
connectedness‐building‐relationships‐classroom/
Bruner,J.(1986).Actualminds,possibleworlds.Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversityPress.
Burr,V.(2015).Socialconstructionism.NewYork:NY:Routledge.
Chenail,R.J.(2010).Gettingspecificaboutqualitativeresearchgeneralizability.Journalof
Ethnographic&QualitativeResearch,5(1),1‐11.
Chun,E.,&Evans,A.(2015).Diverseadministratorsinperil:Thenewindenturedclassin
highereducation.NewYork,NY:Routledge.
Churches,R.(2010).Effectiveclassroomcommunicationpocketbook.Alresford,UK:
Teachers’Pocketbooks.
Cranston,P.(1989).Sexdifferencesinundergraduates'experiencesofcampusmicro‐
inequities.JournalofCollegeStudentDevelopment,30(4),313‐318.
Cranston,P.,&Leonard,M.M.(1990).Therelationshipbetweenundergraduates'
experiencesofcampusmicro‐inequitiesandtheirself‐esteemand
aspirations.JournalofCollegeStudentDevelopment,31(5),395‐401.
![Page 25: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
25
DeLamater,J.D.&Myers,D.J.(2011).Symboliccommunicationandlanguage.Social
Psychology,7,166‐196.
DeLotell,P.J.,Millam,L.A.,&Reinhardt,M.M.(2010).Theuseofdeeplearningstrategiesin
onlinebusinesscoursestoimpactstudentretention.AmericanJournalofBusiness
Education,3(12),49‐56.Retrievedfrom
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1058303.pdf
Dewey,J.(1916).Democracyandeducation.NewYork,NY:FreePress.
Edwards,R.,&HollandJ.(2013).Whatisqualitativeinterviewing?NewYork,NY:
Bloombury.
Everaert,P.,Opdecam,E.,Maussen,S.(2017).Therelationshipbetweenmotivation,
learningapproaches,academicperformanceandtimespent.AccountingEducation,
26(1),78‐107.doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2016.1274911
Forgas,J.P.(2000).Feelingandthinking:Theroleofaffectinsocialcognition.Cambridge:
CambridgeUniversityPress.
Freedman,S.,&Vreven,D.(2016).Workplaceincivilityandbullyinginthelibrary:
Perceptionorreality?.College&ResearchLibraries,77(6),727‐748.
doi:10.5860/crl.77.6.727
Freeman,T.M.,Anderman,L.H.,&Jensen,J.M.(2010).Senseofbelongingincollege
freshmenattheclassroomandcampuslevels.TheJournalofExperimental
Education,75(3),203‐220.doi:10.3200/JEXE.75.3.203‐220
![Page 26: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
26
Garrison,D.R.&Cleveland‐Innes,M.(2005).Facilitatingcognitivepresenceinonline
learning:Interactionisnotenough.TheAmericanJournalofDistanceEducation,
19(3),133–148
Guest,G.,MacQueen,K.M.,&Namey,E.E.(2012).Appliedthematicanalysis.Thousand
Oaks,CA:SAGEPublication,Inc.
Guba,E.G.,&Lincoln,Y.S.(1994).Competingparadigmsinqualitativeresearch.InN.K.
Denzin&Y.S.Lincoln(Eds.),Handbookofqualitativeresearch(pp.105‐117).
ThousandOaks,CA:SAGEPublications,Inc.
Hall,R.M.,&Sandler,B.R.(1982).Theclassroomclimate:Achillyoneforwomen.
Washington,DC:AssociationofAmericanColleges.Retrieved
fromhttps://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED215628
Hoffman,E.(2014).Facultyandstudentrelationships:Contextmatters.CollegeTeaching,
62(1),13‐19.doi:10.1080/87567555.2013.817379
hook,b.(2003).Teachingcommunity:Apedagogyofhope.NewYork,NY:Routledge.
Howie,P.,Bagnall,R.(2013).Acritiqueofthedeepandsurfaceapproachestolearning
model.TeachinginHigherEducation,18(4),389‐400.
Huba,J.&Kronbergs,S.S.(2016).Fiercelyyou:Befabulousandconfidentbythinkinglikea
dragqueen.Oakland,CA:Berrett‐KoehlerPublishers,Inc.
Hutchinson,K.,&Jenkins,F.(2013).Womeninphilosophy:Whatneedstochange.NewYork,
NY:OxfordUniversityPress.
![Page 27: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
27
Illeris,K.(2002).Thethreedimensionsoflearning:Contemporarylearningtheoryinthe
tensionfieldbetweenthecognitive,theemotional,andthesocial.Malabar,FL:Krieger
PublishingCompany.
Illeris,K(2017).Howwelearn:Learningandnon‐learninginschoolandbeyond.NewYork,
NY:Routledge.
Jonassen,D.H.,Myers,J.M.,McKillop,A.M.(1996).Fromconstructivismto
constructionism:Learningwithhypermedia/multimediaratherthanfromit.InB.G.
Wilson(Ed.),Constructivistlearningenvironments:Casestudiesinstructionaldesigns
(pp.93‐106).EnglewoodCliffs,NJ:EducationalTechnology.
Kahu,E.R.,&Nelson,K.(2018).Studentengagementintheeducationalinterface:
Understandingthemechanismsofstudentsuccess.JournalofHigherEducation
Research&Development,37(1),58‐71.doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197
Kahu,E.R.(2013).Framingstudentengagementinhighereducation.StudiesinHigher
Education,38(5),758‐773.doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
Kiraly,D.(2014).Asocialconstructivistapproachtotranslatoreducation:Empowerment
fromtheorytopractice.NewYork,NY:Routledge.
Knapps,M.L.,Hall,J.A.,&Horgan,T.E.(2014).Nonverbalcommunicationinhuman
interaction(8thed.).Boston,MA:Wadsworth,CengageLearning.
Kuh,G.D.(2009).Thenationalsurveyofstudentengagement:Conceptualandempirical
foundations.NewDirectionsforInstitutionalResearch,141,5‐20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ir.283
![Page 28: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
28
Lincoln,M.(2002).Conflictresolutioncommunication:Patternspromotingpeacefulschools.
Lanham,MD:Rowman&Littlefield.
Lucas,U.(2001).Deepandsurfaceapproachestolearningwithinintroductoryaccounting:
Aphenomenographicstudy.AccountingEducation,10(2),161‐184.
doi:10.1080/09639280110073443
Maslow,A.H.(1943).Atheoryofhumanmotivation.PsychologicalReview,50(4),370‐396.
McCroskey,J.C.,Richmond,V.P.,&Bennett,V.E.(2006).Therelationshipsofstudentend‐
of‐classmotivationwithteachercommunicationbehaviorsandinstructional
outcomes.CommunicationEducation,55(4),403‐414,doi:
10.1080/03634520600702562
Meadors,J.D.,&Murray,C.B.(2014).Measuringnonverbalbiasthroughbodylanguage
responsestostereotypes.JournalofNonverbalBehavior,38(2),209‐229.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10919‐013‐0172‐y
Mehrabian,A.(1968).Communicationwithoutwords.PsychologyToday,2(9),52‐55.
Morreale,S.P.,Spitzberg,B.H.,Barge,J.K.(2007).Humancommunication:Motivation,
knowledge,andskills.(2nded.).Belmont,CA:ThomsonHigherEducation.
Morrissette,P.(2001).Reducingincivilityintheuniversity/collegeclassroom.IEJLL:
InternationalElectronicJournalforLeadershipinLearning,5(4).Retrievedfrom
http://iejll.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/iejll/index.php/ijll/article/view/497/159
Nadal,K.L.(2017).TheSAGEencyclopediaofpsychologyandgender.ThousandOaks,CA:
SAGEPublications,Inc.
![Page 29: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
29
NationalSurveyofStudentEngagement(2017).Inclusiveclassroompracticeslinkedto
higher‐orderlearningandgreatergainsduringcollege,surveyfinds.Retrievedfrom
http://nsse.indiana.edu/NSSE_2017_Results/pdf/Press_Release%E2%80%8C.pdf
Niemiec,C.P.,&Ryan,R.M.(2009).Autonomy,competence,andrelatednessinthe
classroom:Applyingself‐determinationtheorytoeducationalpractice.SchoolField,
7(2),133‐144.doi:10.177/1477878509104318
Okon,J.J.(2011).Roleofnon‐verbalcommunicationineducation.MediterraneanJournalof
SocialSciences,2(5),35‐40.
Piaget,J.(2013).Theconstructionofrealityinthechild(Vol.82).NewYork,NY:Routledge.
Reio,T.G.,Jr.,&Ghosh,R.(2009).Antecedentsandoutcomesofworkplaceincivility:
Implicationsforhumanresourcedevelopment.HumanResourceDevelopment
Quarterly,20,237‐264.
Rossman,G.B.,&Rallis,S.F.(2016).Anintroductiontoqualitativeresearch:Learninginthe
field(4thed.).ThousandOaks,CA:SAGEPublications,Inc.
Rowan,L.,&Grootenboer,P.(2017).Studentengagementandrapportinhighereducation:
Thecaseforrelationship‐centeredpedagogies.Switzerland:PalgraveMacmillan.
Rowe,M.P.(2008).Micro‐affirmationsµ‐inequities.JournaloftheInternational
OmbudsmanAssociation,1(1),45‐48.
Saeed,S.,&Zyngier,D.(2012).Howmotivationinfluencesstudentengagement:A
qualitativecasestudy.JournalofEducationandLearning,1(2),252‐267
![Page 30: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
30
Sandler,B.R.,&Hall,R.M.(1986).Thecampusclimaterevisited:Chillyforwomenfaculty,
administrators,andgraduatestudents.Washington,D.C.AssociationofAmerican
Colleges,ProjectontheStatusandEducationofWomen.
Saporu,D.F.,&Herbers,J.M.(2014).What’sinatitle?:Gendermicro‐inequitiesina
universityhumanresourcesdatabase.NASPAJournalAboutWomeninHigher
Education,8(3),101‐116.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19407882.2014.987088
Scarlett,W.G.(Ed.).(2015).TheSAGEencyclopediaofclassroommanagement.Thousand
Oaks,CA:SAGEPublications,Inc.
Schnellmann,J.&Gibbons,J.L.,(1984).Micro‐inequitiesintheclassroom:Theperception
byminoritiesandwomenofalessfavorableclimateintheclassroom.Proceedingsof
theAnnualConventionoftheAmericanPsychologicalAssociation,1‐27.Retrieved
fromhttp://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED251769.pdf
Spradley,J.P.(2016).Participantobservation.Belmont,CA:Wadsworth,CengageLearning.
Stake,R.E.(2005).Qualitativecasestudies.InN.K.Denzin&Y.S.Lincoln(Eds.),The
Sagehandbookofqualitativeresearch(pp.443‐466).ThousandOaks,CA:Sage
PublicationsLtd.
Strayhorn,T.L.(2012).Collegestudents’senseofbelonging:Akeytoeducationalsuccessfor
allstudents.NewYork,NY:Routledge
Sue,D.W.,Capodilupo,C.M.,Torino,G.C.,Bucceri,J.M.,Holder,A.M.B.,Nadal,K.L.,&
Esquilin,M.(2007).Racialmicroaggressionsineverydaylife:Implicationsfor
clinicalpractice.AmericanPsychologist,62(4),271‐286.Retrievedfrom
![Page 31: THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081611/5f07c69a7e708231d41eaf67/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018
31
http://world‐trust.org/wp‐content/uploads/2011/05/7‐Racial‐Microagressions‐
in‐Everyday‐Life.pdf
Sue,D.W.(2010).Microaggressionsineverydaylife:Race,gender,andsexualorientation.
Hoboken,NJ:JohnWiley&Son,Inc.
Young,S.(2006).Micromessaging:Whyleadershipisgreatbeyondwords.NewYork,NY:
McGrawHillEducation.
Vygotsky,L.S.(2012).Thoughtandlanguage(Reviseded.).Cambridge,MA:TheMITPress.
Wentzel,K.R.,&Ramani,G.B.(2016).Handbookofsocialinfluencesinschoolcontexts:
social‐emotional,motivation,andcognitiveoutcomes.NewYork,NY:Routledge.
Williams,J.D.,Woodson,A.N.,&Wallace,T.L.(2016).“CanwesaytheN‐word?”:Exploring
psychologicalsafetyduringracetalk.ResearchinHumanDevelopment,13,15‐31.
doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2016.1141279
Wright,M.,&Hill,L.H.(2015).Academicincivilityamonghealthsciencesfaculty.Adult
Learning26(1),14‐20.doi:10.1177/1045159514558410
Wubbels,T.,Brekelmans,M.,denBrok,P.,Wijsman,L.,Mainhard,T.,&anTartwijk,J.
(2014).Teacher‐studentrelationshipsandclassroommanagement.InE.T.Emmer,
E.Sabornie,C.Evertson,&C.Weinstein(Eds.).Handbookofclassroommanagement:
Research,practice,andcontemporaryissues(2nded.,pp.363–386).NewYork,NY:
Routledge.