throw the dice! - 3d medical printing series

24
3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019 © Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 1 Throw the Dice! Legal aspects of 3D medical printing Ernst-Jan Louwers, LLM Maastricht, 30 th January 2019 3D Medical Printing Conference 1 2

Upload: others

Post on 21-Mar-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 1

Throw the Dice!

Legal aspects of 3D medical printing

Ernst-Jan Louwers, LLM

Maastricht, 30th January 2019

3D Medical Printing Conference

1

2

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 2

Are you aware of your legal position and risksin 3D printing?

What is your role in the value chain of the future of today?

Wake-up!

3

4

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 3

• Brief intro

• Medical Devices legislation

• Intellectual property

• Supply chain

• Liability

• Roadmap to market

Agenda Legal roadmap

Gurt Swanenberg

Eindhoven Den Haag

Who are we?

• IP & tech boutique firm

• Experienced & specialised

• To the point & no nonsense

5

6

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 4

“We only do what we are damn good at”

Protect & attack

Enable & empower

It’s not easy…Topics to consider

Ownership

Body parts or cells

Implants

Data

Intellectualproperty andtrade secrets

Compliance

Medicaldevices

legislation

Ethics andcodes of conduct

Fundamentalrights

Privacy

R&D

Collaboration

Background IP and

knowhow

Foreground IP and

knowhow

Valorisationand

exploitation

Supply chain

Changing rolls

Relationships

Risk

Liability

7

8

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 5

Medical devices legislation EU

• Medical Devices Directive 93/42

• Medical Devices Regulation 2017/745 (entry into force May 2020)

Medical Devices Directive

• 3D printed medical devices: currently ‘custom-made devices’ (Article 1(2)(d) MDD)o specific prescription for sole use of a particular

patient

o not being a mass-produced device adapted to meet specific requirements

• Less requirements than standard medical deviceso no comformity assessment by notified body

o no specific quality management system

o no CE mark

9

10

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 6

New EU regulation 2017/745

• Nothing specific about 3D printing

• 3D printed medical devices no longer regulated as ‘custom-made devices’?

Custom-made device under MDR

• Definition ‘custom-made device’ (Article 2(3) MDR)o specifically made in accordance with a written prescription of any

person authorised

o specific design characteristics

o and is intended for the sole use of a particular patient

o exclusively to meet their individual conditions and needs

• Not custom-made deviceo mass-produced devices which need to be adapted to meet specific

requirements

o devices which are mass-produced by means of industrial manufacturing processes

11

12

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 7

Consequences of MDR for 3D printed devices

• 3D printed patient-specific devices which are industrially mass-produced

o not ‘custom-made’

o standard medical device

Alternative: ‘in-house’

• Escape: ‘in-house’ 3D printed medical devices

• Recital 30 MDR:“Health institutions should have the possibility of manufacturing, modifying and using devices in-house and thereby address, on a non-industrial scale, the specific needs of target patient groups which cannot be met at the appropriate level of performance by an equivalent device available on the market”

13

14

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 8

Requirements ‘in-house’ devices

• Less requirements (article 5(5) MDR)For health institutions established in EU

• But still:

o quality management system

o declaration

o documentation

Alternative: ‘in-house’

• Healthcare facility = ‘manufacturer’ (article2(30) MDR)

“natural or legal person who manufactures or fully refurbishes a device or has a device designed, manufactured or fully refurbished, and markets that device under its name or trademark.”

• Negative aspects:

o obligations related to status of ‘manufacturer’

o manufacturer’s liability including product liability

15

16

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 9

Some legal challenges

IntellectualProperty

Material

Method

Output

Liability

Risk

Who?

When?

Supplychain

R&D

Factory

Reseller

IP main driver: protect it!

17

18

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 10

Material Method HardwareSoftware and data

Output

Your business plan to market

Materials

19

20

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 11

Material patentable?

Starting materialpatentable?

• Products of nature: in principlenot patentable

• Isolated human genes?o US: NO, but…

o AMP/Myriad case

o Europe: until now YESo Comparable to plant breeding

o Public opinion…

• Nonhuman (synthetic): YES

21

22

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 12

Methods

Methods patentable?

• Technology of bioprinting

o YES

• Products directly resulting from method?

o In principle YES (‘product by process’)

23

24

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 13

Hardware, software and data

Hardware and embedded software:patent, copyright, database

25

26

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 14

Software and data:patent, copyright, database

Tissue and spare parts

27

28

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 15

Tissue and spare parts: IP protected?

Can you patent an ear?

Printed using human cells from Lieuwe van

Gogh, great-grandson of Vincent van Gogh

(sharing 1/16th of the same genes)

Output: IP protected?

Can you patent an ear?

• Printed human tissue or organs patentable? o function and structure significantly different from human

cells

o not simply ‘products of nature’

• Inventive step?

• Novelty? o right ear is same as left ear - no novelty?

• Output of method: ‘product by process’

29

30

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 16

Ethical challenges and legislation

• Legal limitations on use of human tissue

• Privacy

• IP?

• Ownership

Protheses and dental

31

32

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 17

• 3D printed jaw patentable?

• 3D printed joints patentable?

• Shape and function?

• Or only the material?

BUT again:

• Method and output as ‘product by process’

• Mixtures and intermediate result may bepatentable

Protheses and dental & IP

33

34

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 18

Protect and enforce

Reprint your partner: infringement?

35

36

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 19

Shift happens…

Liability

Supplychain

Changing the game…

• Hospitals to become factories

• Doctors becoming engineers

• Engineers becoming doctors

• Dentists printing implants

• Industry becoming suppliers of human tissue and spares

37

38

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 20

Throw the dice

Reconsider your position and relationships!

Where do you stand in the value chain of the future?

What if something goes terriblywrong?

39

40

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 21

Output - risks

Contamination

Rupture of implant

Product liability

• Defective products

• Who is producer? Legislation!

• Who is responsible?

• Who is liable? Legislation!

41

42

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 22

Hospital as manufacturer

• Own responsibility?

• Liability? For what?

• Warranty?

• Agreements?

Spare parts and solving implants

• Print it yourself protheses

• Limited warranty?

• Product liability?

• Remove?

• Recall?

43

44

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 23

Not only prepare business plan

Roadmap to market

But also your legal plan

Material Method HardwareSoftware and data

Output

Throw the dice:whatever your game is…

Protect? Contract Manage

RepositionReconsider Reorganize

45

46

3D Medical Printing Conference Maastricht, 30th January 2019

© Louwers IP|Technology Advocaten 24

Prevent your MAYDAY… call your lawyer!

www.louwersadvocaten.nl

@louwerslaw

@ejlouwers

[email protected]

+31 40 2393200

+31 6 52 048154

47

48