three-dimensional full-field x-ray orientation microscopy · ebsd comparison on ti sample comparing...

27
Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy Nicola Viganò a),b),c) , W. Ludwig a),b) , K.J. Batenburg c),d),e) a) European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France b) MATEIS, University INSA of Lyon, France c) VisionLab, University of Antwerp, Belgium d) Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Amsterdam, Netherlands e) Universiteit Leiden, Netherlands

Upload: others

Post on 13-Aug-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Three-dimensional Full-fieldX-ray Orientation Microscopy

Nicola Viganòa),b),c), W. Ludwiga),b), K.J. Batenburgc),d),e)

a) European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, Franceb) MATEIS, University INSA of Lyon, Francec) VisionLab, University of Antwerp, Belgiumd) Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Amsterdam, Netherlandse) Universiteit Leiden, Netherlands

Page 2: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Wait! Local “orientation”, uhm... what?

● Crystallographic Orientation:“Relationship between the crystal coordinate system and a reference coordinate system”

● Plastic deformation can result in an orientation change:If the deformation doesn't change the intrinsic structure of the coordinate system, it simply results in a rotation of the said system.

Nicola Viganò 2

X

Y

Z

X

Y

Z

Rotation Axis

Reference System Rotated System

Page 3: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

OK, but what about deformation in grains?

● Disorientation map for a poly-crystal:

● Highest levels of deformation at the grain boundaries.

Nicola Viganò 3

Page 4: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Summary

● Introduction to Diffraction Contrast Tomography● Materials with Deformation● Our Model / Algorithm● Results● Conclusions

Nicola Viganò 4

Page 5: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Intro to Diffraction Contrast Tomography 1/2

● Diffraction Contrast Tomography is a non-destructive characterization of 3D grain microstructure:● Assumes undeformed materials● Uses 2D monochromatic beams● Simultaneous acquisition of

transmitted and diffracted beam● Acquisition time: 0.1-10h● Performs a continuous rotation

over 360°, with steps of 0.05-0.1° (7200-3600 images)

Nicola Viganò 5

W. Ludwig et al., Rev. Sci. Instr. 2009

Synchrotron beam

ω

Detector Plane

Grain alignedfor Diffraction Diffraction Spot

Page 6: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Intro to Diffraction Contrast Tomography 2/2

● Using the Friedel pairs it is possible to index the grains● Diffraction spots as projections● We use traditional oblique angles

tomography codes to reconstructthe shape of the grains

● This also works for multi-phase materials! a) Phase Contrast Tomography

b) DCT – Austenite

c) DCT – Ferrite

Nicola Viganò 6

P. Reischig et al., J. of Applied Crystal 2013

Page 7: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Summary

● Introduction to Diffraction Contrast Tomography● Materials with Deformation● Our Model /Algorithm● Results● Conclusions

Nicola Viganò 7

Page 8: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Reconstruction of (un)deformed material

● Given a 3D voxellated volume

● If not deformed:● All voxels have same projection angle● Simple (line) back-projection geometry● Can be handled as a 3D (oblique angle)

ART problem

● If deformed:● Vector (Tensor) field with 3 (9) unknowns

Or equivalently: scalar 6D (12D) problem● Complicated back-projection geometry● Needs another approach...

Nicola Viganò 8

x = x1

x2

x3

x =

x1

x2

x3

r1

r2

r3

Page 9: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Reconstruction with plastic deformation

● Strain is a small perturbation compared to the plastic deformation of the crystal lattice. If we ignore it:● The reconstruction representation can be modelled either as a

3D vector field, or as a 6D scalar field● In the 3D vector field representation, each vector of each voxel is the

associated local average orientation● In the 6D scalar field representation, each intensity of each voxel is the

intensity of the “diffraction signal” for the given point of the extended representation

● The deformed projection geometryboth distorts the projected images,and spreads the signal over multipleimages, for each projection

Nicola Viganò 9

x =

x1

x2

x3

r1

r2

r3Diffraction Blob

ω+δ ω−δω

Page 10: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Summary

● Introduction to Diffraction Contrast Tomography● Materials with Deformation● Our Model /Algorithm● Results● Conclusions

Nicola Viganò 10

Page 11: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Insight of the 6D space

● 3D orientation-space volume that forms an ODF● 3D real-space a collection of one ODF for each voxel in

the volume

● In our implementation we do the inverse: 3D real-space volume are the voxels of a 3D orientation-space

Nicola Viganò 11

r3

r1

r2

o3

o1

o2

Single voxel ODF (Orientation Distribution Function)

Page 12: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Projection geometry in standard DCT

● Undeformed grains will project to the same ωs

● Oblique angle reconstruction, using traditional algorithms (e.g. SIRT)

Nicola Viganò 12

Page 13: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Points in the orientation space

● Projection geometry of three different orientations:

Nicola Viganò 13

Page 14: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Tomography and Mathematical Optimization

● Tomography can be represented as:● To deal with indeterminacy and noise:● Our case is not so “easy”:● But we linearised it! (by unfolding-sampling the 6D

space, at the expense of multiplying the unknowns)● Assuming that only few of these orientations will be

active in each real-space voxel, we can look for a sparse solution (l1-min):

● Or, if the density is homogeneous in the grains, we could apply a “flatness” constrain on the 3D space representation:

Nicola Viganò 14

W x= y

minϕ(x)=‖W x− y‖22

minϕ(x)=‖W x− y‖22+λ‖x‖1 s . t . : x≥0

W ( x ) x= y

minϕ(x)=‖W x− y‖22+λ TV (S x ) s . t . : x≥0

Page 15: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Details of the mathematics

● The implementation is pretty simple: there's a 1↔1 relationship between the mathematical objects and the functions of the algorithm:● is the projection of all the volumes to the detector

● is the back-projection of the images on the detector to the volumes

Nicola Viganò 15

W

W T

Summing all the contributions from the different volumes (orientations) for each ω, we obtain the images on the detector

ω

(o1 , o2 , o3)

(o1 ' , o2 ' , o3 ' )

ω

ω

Page 16: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Summary

● Introduction to Diffraction Contrast Tomography● Materials with Deformation● Our Model /Algorithm● Results● Conclusions

Nicola Viganò 16

Page 17: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

EBSD Comparison on Ti sample

● Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against EBSD measurements

Nicola Viganò 17

(a) EBSD – Full surface(b) 3D-DCT– ROI(c) EBSD – ROI(d) 6D-DCT– ROI

Page 18: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Deformation in Ti sample

● Looking at the reconstructed deformation:

Nicola Viganò 18

Page 19: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

NaCl sample (up to 1-2 deg of deformation)

● Surface: 3D-DCT 6D-DCT

Nicola Viganò 19

(1) Each indexed grain alone(2) With clustering and extension

EBSD

Page 20: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Real Data (up to 1-2 deg spread)

● Surface: 3D-DCT 6D-DCT

Nicola Viganò 20

(1) Each indexed grain alone(2) With clustering and extension

EBSD

Why are those regions missing, and what can we do about it?

Page 21: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Cluster reconstructions 1/2

● Can we use the 6D algorithm to index grains?● What if we simply tried reconstructing from the raw detector

images taken from an arbitrary bounding box in the 6D-space?● Let's use the indexed grains from a cluster to define the

6D bounding box:

Nicola Viganò 21

Sum of all the omegas from one of the blobs defined by the 6D bounding box, when projected to the detector

A [2 2 2] reflection at:θ = 6.21°η = 112.112°Δω = 6.7° (67 images)

Page 22: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Cluster reconstructions 1/2

● Can we use the 6D algorithm to index grains?● What if we simply tried reconstructing from the raw detector

images taken from an arbitrary bounding box in the 6D-space?● Let's use the indexed grains from a cluster to define the

6D bounding box:

Nicola Viganò 22

Page 23: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Cluster reconstructions 2/2

IGM KAM

Nicola Viganò 23

Intra-Granular Misorientation Kernel Average Misorientation

Page 24: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Real Data (up to 1-2 deg spread)

● Surface: 3D-DCT 6D-DCT(1) 6D-DCT(2)

Nicola Viganò 24

(1) Each indexed grain alone(2) With clustering and extension

EBSD

Page 25: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Summary

● Introduction to Diffraction Contrast Tomography● Materials with Deformation● Our Model /Algorithm● Results● Conclusions

Nicola Viganò 25

Page 26: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Recap of the main ideas

● In this model we represent each voxel as a stack of discretized orientations, each representing the contribution of that voxel to a particular orientation.

● Allowing many orientations per each voxel, it blows up the number of unknowns

● By minimizing the l1-norm of the 6D representation, sparse solutions are prioritized, thereby improving the ability to reconstruct using far more unknowns than equations

● Sampling in the orientation domain is an essential topic

Nicola Viganò 26

Page 27: Three-dimensional Full-field X-ray Orientation Microscopy · EBSD Comparison on Ti sample Comparing a reconstruction using the 3D-DCT and 6D-DCT on the surface sensitivity, against

Conclusions

● Real data shows very good improvements especially for those scenarios (surface sensitivity) where traditional DCT had more troubles.

● Can complement indexing techniques● Shows potential for further improvements and

extensions:● Use of Far-field information● Overcome spot/blob segmentation issues● Overcome overlap on experimental images

Nicola Viganò 27