thomas fleiner: class no. 13 - 14 criteria to evaluate governmental systems belgrade law faculty...

17
Thomas Fleiner: Class No. 13 - 14 Criteria to evaluate Governmental Systems Belgrade Law Faculty Master Course on Comparative Constitutional Review Prof. Lidija Basta Fleiner Prof. Thomas Fleiner November 23 to December 12 2009

Upload: gerard-reynolds

Post on 12-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Thomas Fleiner: Class No. 13 - 14 Criteria to evaluate Governmental Systems Belgrade Law Faculty Master Course on Comparative Constitutional Review Prof

Thomas Fleiner: Class No. 13 - 14

Criteria to evaluateGovernmental Systems

Belgrade Law FacultyMaster Course on

Comparative Constitutional Review

Prof. Lidija Basta FleinerProf. Thomas Fleiner

November 23 to December 12 2009

Page 2: Thomas Fleiner: Class No. 13 - 14 Criteria to evaluate Governmental Systems Belgrade Law Faculty Master Course on Comparative Constitutional Review Prof

Issues:

1 Democracy

2 Rule of Law

3 Human Rights

4 Problems of Constitutions

5 Conclusion Criteria

Page 3: Thomas Fleiner: Class No. 13 - 14 Criteria to evaluate Governmental Systems Belgrade Law Faculty Master Course on Comparative Constitutional Review Prof

Democracy

Of the people – by the people – for the people

Page 4: Thomas Fleiner: Class No. 13 - 14 Criteria to evaluate Governmental Systems Belgrade Law Faculty Master Course on Comparative Constitutional Review Prof

Why D

em

ocr

acy

?Liberty- Self-Determination

Finding the Truth

Rational Conflict Management

Efficiency Majority

Participation - Legitimacy

Accountability

Limit Governmental Power

Page 5: Thomas Fleiner: Class No. 13 - 14 Criteria to evaluate Governmental Systems Belgrade Law Faculty Master Course on Comparative Constitutional Review Prof

Democracy, Legitimacyand: …...

Efficiency

FragmentedNations

Transition

Globalization

Equality

Liberty

Rule of Law

Tyranny of theMajority

Transparency

Page 6: Thomas Fleiner: Class No. 13 - 14 Criteria to evaluate Governmental Systems Belgrade Law Faculty Master Course on Comparative Constitutional Review Prof

Typ

es

of

Dem

ocr

acy

Procedural Substantial

Direct Represen-tative

Semi-direct

Winnertakes all

Consociacional Democracy

Page 7: Thomas Fleiner: Class No. 13 - 14 Criteria to evaluate Governmental Systems Belgrade Law Faculty Master Course on Comparative Constitutional Review Prof

Party SystemElectoral SystemSeparation of PowersInformation and MediaAccountabilityParticipationCapacity to deliverEffective administration

Democracy:Of the peopleBy the peopleFor the people

DecentralizationLocal GovernanceMinoritiesFiscal GovernanceCollective RightsMinimize CorruptionCooperation

Page 8: Thomas Fleiner: Class No. 13 - 14 Criteria to evaluate Governmental Systems Belgrade Law Faculty Master Course on Comparative Constitutional Review Prof

Problems ofDemocracy

LobbiesPrinciple

Of Oligarchie

Corruption Public InterestEconomy

ExclusionForeigners Minorities

Volonté Générale v.Volonté de Tous

Media

Page 9: Thomas Fleiner: Class No. 13 - 14 Criteria to evaluate Governmental Systems Belgrade Law Faculty Master Course on Comparative Constitutional Review Prof

RepresentativeDemocracy

Representation Constituency

Pluralism of Parties

The whole peopleVolonté Générale

Higher being

Volonté de TousInterests

Electoral System

Page 10: Thomas Fleiner: Class No. 13 - 14 Criteria to evaluate Governmental Systems Belgrade Law Faculty Master Course on Comparative Constitutional Review Prof

People

55%

Parliament

Executive

Ele

ctio

ns

45%

Parties inGovernment

Page 11: Thomas Fleiner: Class No. 13 - 14 Criteria to evaluate Governmental Systems Belgrade Law Faculty Master Course on Comparative Constitutional Review Prof

Semi-directDemocracy

Parliament

Parties

Economy

People:Elects and

decides

Executive

Admini-stration

VolontéGénérale?

Page 12: Thomas Fleiner: Class No. 13 - 14 Criteria to evaluate Governmental Systems Belgrade Law Faculty Master Course on Comparative Constitutional Review Prof

Separation of Powers

Division of Labour

Separation of Powers

Checks and Balances

New ChallengesMediaTerrorismGlobalizationMigration

Page 13: Thomas Fleiner: Class No. 13 - 14 Criteria to evaluate Governmental Systems Belgrade Law Faculty Master Course on Comparative Constitutional Review Prof

Limits of Sovereignty Bonhams CaseIndependence of JudiciaryImpartiality of JudgesProfessionalism of Judicial SystemAccess to JusticeFairness of procedureAdversary – inquisitory procedureJury - TrialRight to defenseTimeMediator - Ombudsperson

Rule of LawThat men are ruled by law an not by men

Justice must be seen to be done

Page 14: Thomas Fleiner: Class No. 13 - 14 Criteria to evaluate Governmental Systems Belgrade Law Faculty Master Course on Comparative Constitutional Review Prof

Constitutional CatalogueRestrictionEmergencyReference to international lawFairness in ProcedureSubstantive due ProcessConstitutional – Administrative review(access to justice)

Human RightsGolden Rule: Just as you want

others to do for you, do the same for them;no discrimination

Human DignityExpressionInformationReligionPropertyAssemblyInformationFour freedomsEconomic andSocial Rights: Educa-tion, health, labor, housing

Page 15: Thomas Fleiner: Class No. 13 - 14 Criteria to evaluate Governmental Systems Belgrade Law Faculty Master Course on Comparative Constitutional Review Prof

Main Problems ofConstitutions

Judicial Independence and access to justice

Vagueness - implementation

Consistency

Decentralization

Transparency

Corruption

Accountability

Human Rights – restrictions - emergency

Constitutional Amendments and Revision

Constitutional review

Referendum

Page 16: Thomas Fleiner: Class No. 13 - 14 Criteria to evaluate Governmental Systems Belgrade Law Faculty Master Course on Comparative Constitutional Review Prof

Conclusions

Page 17: Thomas Fleiner: Class No. 13 - 14 Criteria to evaluate Governmental Systems Belgrade Law Faculty Master Course on Comparative Constitutional Review Prof

Criteria

Input - output

Minorities

Tra

nsp

are

ncy

Acco

unta

-bility

ParticipationCapacity to Learn

Legi

timac

y

Rule of Law

Efficiency

Minimalis

e Hum

an

Failu

res