third quarter 2016 resultss1.q4cdn.com/456119668/files/doc_presentations/2016/mic...november 4th,...

15
1 Genworth MI Canada Inc. Q3 2016 Results November 4 th , 2016 Third Quarter 2016 Results

Upload: others

Post on 31-May-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Third Quarter 2016 Resultss1.q4cdn.com/456119668/files/doc_presentations/2016/MIC...November 4th, 2016 Third Quarter 2016 Results Q3 2016 Results Genworth MI Canada Inc. 2 Forward-looking

1 Genworth MI Canada Inc. Q3 2016 Results

November 4th, 2016

Third Quarter 2016 Results

Page 2: Third Quarter 2016 Resultss1.q4cdn.com/456119668/files/doc_presentations/2016/MIC...November 4th, 2016 Third Quarter 2016 Results Q3 2016 Results Genworth MI Canada Inc. 2 Forward-looking

2 Genworth MI Canada Inc. Q3 2016 Results

Forward-looking and non-IFRS statements

DRIVING VALUE THROUGH CUSTOMIZED SERVICE EXPERIENCE

Public communications, including oral or written communications such as this document, relating to Genworth MI Canada Inc. (the

“Company”, “Genworth Canada” or “MIC”) often contain certain forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements

include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the Company’s future operating and financial results, expectations

regarding premiums written, losses on claims and investment income, the Canadian housing market, and other statements that are

not historical facts. These forward-looking statements may be identified by their use of words such as “may”, “would”, “could”, “will,”

“intend”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “seek”, “propose”, “estimate”, “expect”, and similar expressions. These statements are based

on the Company’s current assumptions, including assumptions regarding economic, global, political, business, competitive, market

and regulatory matters. These forward-looking statements are inherently subject to significant risks, uncertainties and changes in

circumstances, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. The Company’s actual results may differ materially from

those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including as a result of changes in the facts underlying the

Company’s assumptions, and the other risks described in the Company’s most recently issued Annual Information Form,

Management’s Discussion and Analysis, its Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated June 18, 2014, the Prospectus Supplements

thereto, and all documents incorporated by reference in such documents. Management’s current views regarding the Company’s

financial outlook are stated as of the date hereof and may not be appropriate for other purposes. Other than as required by

applicable laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a

result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

To supplement its financial statements, the Company uses select non-IFRS financial measures. Non-IFRS financial measures

include net operating income, interest and dividend income (net of investment expenses), operating earnings per common share

(basic), operating earnings per common share (diluted), shareholders’ equity excluding accumulated other comprehensive income

(“AOCI”), operating return on equity and underwriting ratios such as loss ratio, expense ratio, combined ratio, cures and effective tax

rate. The Company believes that these non-IFRS financial measures provide meaningful supplemental information regarding its

performance and may be useful to investors because they allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by

management in its financial and operational decision making. Non-IFRS measures do not have standardized meanings and are

unlikely to be comparable to any similar measures presented by other companies. These measures are defined in the Company’s

glossary, which is posted on the Company’s website at http://investor.genworthmicanada.ca. A reconciliation from non-IFRS

financial measures to the most readily comparable measures calculated in accordance with IFRS, where applicable can be found in

the Company’s most recent management’s discussion and analysis, which is posted on the Company’s website and is also available

at www.sedar.com.

Page 3: Third Quarter 2016 Resultss1.q4cdn.com/456119668/files/doc_presentations/2016/MIC...November 4th, 2016 Third Quarter 2016 Results Q3 2016 Results Genworth MI Canada Inc. 2 Forward-looking

3 Genworth MI Canada Inc. Q3 2016 Results

$1.00 $1.03

$0.99

$1.07

$1.02

Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016

Q3 2016 financial results

$MM except

ROE, EPS &

MCT

Q3

2016

Q2

2016

Q3

2015 Q/Q Y / Y

Premiums

written $223 $249 $260 -10% -14%

Loss ratio 25% 21% 21% +4 pts +4 pts

Net Operating

Income $93 $99 $92 -6% +1%

Operating ROE 11% 12% 12% -1% -1%

Operating EPS

(dil.) $1.02 $1.07 $1.00 -6% +2%

MCT1 236% 233% 228% +3 pt +8 pts

Q3 key highlights

• Increased quarterly dividend by 5% to $0.44 per common

share

• Premiums written decreased Q/Q due to lower portfolio

insurance volumes, partly offset by premiums from

transactional insurance

• Loss ratio rose to 25%, due to an increase in new

delinquencies, primarily from oil-producing regions

• Op. income down 6% Q/Q, due to higher losses on claims,

partly offset by higher premiums earned

• Ongoing capital strength with MCT ratio of 236%1

Operating EPS (diluted) Book Value Per Share (diluted, incl. AOCI)

$36.14 $36.82 $37.23 $38.23

$39.01

Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016

+8%

YoY

1. Q3 2016 MCT company estimate. MCT denotes ratio for operating insurance company.

2. Company sources.

Page 4: Third Quarter 2016 Resultss1.q4cdn.com/456119668/files/doc_presentations/2016/MIC...November 4th, 2016 Third Quarter 2016 Results Q3 2016 Results Genworth MI Canada Inc. 2 Forward-looking

4 Genworth MI Canada Inc. Q3 2016 Results

$26 $18

$22

$78 $24

$22

$32

2015 YTD Q3'16

Top line

$3.9 $3.4 $5.9 $4.5

$6.8 $5.8 $4.1

$25.9 $8.3

$6.9 $6.1

$6.5

$6.2 $9.6

2015 YTD Q3'16 2015 YTD Q3'16

New insurance written ($ billions) Premiums written ($ millions)

Note: Company sources.

$25.2 $25.7

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q3 Highlights

• Transactional NIW decreased, largely due to targeted underwriting changes implemented in the prior year,

and a smaller transactional insurance market size

• Transactional premiums written impacted by smaller volumes, partially offset by a higher average premium

rate

• Lower portfolio insurance average premium rate due to lower LTVs and higher credit quality

Transactional Portfolio

$104 $99

$183 $170

$236 $201

$181

2015 YTD Q3'16

$705

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Transactional Portfolio

Average premium rate

2.79% 2.93%

$16.1

$37.0

$470

$118

Average premium rate

0.40% 0.32%

$104

Page 5: Third Quarter 2016 Resultss1.q4cdn.com/456119668/files/doc_presentations/2016/MIC...November 4th, 2016 Third Quarter 2016 Results Q3 2016 Results Genworth MI Canada Inc. 2 Forward-looking

5 Genworth MI Canada Inc. Q3 2016 Results

New mortgage rules

NEW MORTGAGE RULES DRIVE HIGHER QUALITY BUT SMALLER MARKET SIZE

High Loan-to-Value Low Loan-to-Value

Effective October 17, 2016, for

new originations:

Product

• GDS/TDS of 39% & 44%

calculated using greater of

contract rate or the Bank of

Canada conventional five-

year posted rate

• As of September 28, 2016 the

Bank of Canada posted rate

was 4.64%

Effective November 30, 2016, for new originations:

Product

• GDS/TDS of 39% & 44% calculated using greater of contract

rate or the Bank of Canada conventional five-year posted rate

• Purchases and renewals … refinances ineligible

• Max. 25 year amortization

• Property value < $1,000,000

• Min. credit score of 600 at time loan is approved (subject to a

3% exception bucket by lender)

• Owner-occupied & 2-4 unit rentals

Transactional market size

expected to decrease by

15% to 25% in 2017

Portfolio insured volumes expected to decrease by 25% to 35%

of “normalized” volumes (post July 1, 2016 regulatory changes)

Low LTV

loans subject

to similar

high LTV

eligibility

criteria,

starting

Nov. 30th

Grandfathering provisions

• Loans with a binding offer

dated prior to Oct. 17 are

exempt from new mortgage

rules

Grandfathering provisions

• Loans with a binding offer dated prior to Oct. 17 (or between Oct. 17-Nov. 29

that close prior to May 1, 2017) are exempt from new mortgage rules

• Grandfathered loans submitted for portfolio insurance after Nov. 30, 2016 will

continue to be eligible under the old parameters

Page 6: Third Quarter 2016 Resultss1.q4cdn.com/456119668/files/doc_presentations/2016/MIC...November 4th, 2016 Third Quarter 2016 Results Q3 2016 Results Genworth MI Canada Inc. 2 Forward-looking

6 Genworth MI Canada Inc. Q3 2016 Results

National median price stable

with regional variances

High portfolio quality

Note: Company sources for transactional new insurance written.

Highlights

Steady credit score

improvement year-over-year

New mortgage eligibility

rules would have

impacted 16% of

borrowers (YTD ’16)

with respect to GDS

minimum of 39%

Credit score Gross debt service ratio distribution (%) Median home price (In ‘$000s)

$2

25

$2

32

$2

40

$2

55

$2

70

$2

75

$2

80

$2

91

$2

95

$2

97

'07

'08

'09

'10

'11

'12

'13

'14

'15

YT

D '16

16

%

3%

71

6

752

'07

'08

'09

'10

'11

'12

'13

'14

'15

YT

D '16

% Score <660 (R) Avg score (L)

91 90 89

71

9 10 11

13

7

'14 '15 YTD'16 YTD'[email protected]%*

<=35 >35 to <=39 >39 to <=41

>41 to <=43 >43

16%

* Note: ‘14, ‘15, and YTD ’16 based on contract rate. YTD ’16 @ 4.64% represents borrowers who would be qualifying at the higher of the contract rate and posted rate.

WHILE GDS & TDS RESTRICTIONS IMPACTED ~33% OF 2016 YTD BORROWERS, WE EXPECT

BORROWERS TO ADAPT BEHAVIOUR, THEREBY LIMITING TRANSACTIONAL MARKET SIZE IMPACT

Page 7: Third Quarter 2016 Resultss1.q4cdn.com/456119668/files/doc_presentations/2016/MIC...November 4th, 2016 Third Quarter 2016 Results Q3 2016 Results Genworth MI Canada Inc. 2 Forward-looking

7 Genworth MI Canada Inc. Q3 2016 Results

366 385 383 349 331

203 181 187 166 163

257 303 424 467

617

578 624

656 578

504

198 204

222 212

211 113

132

162 189

201

Q3'15 Q4'15 Q1'16 Q2'16 Q3'16

1,715 1,829

2,034 1,961

2,027

Delinquency trends

Ontario

BC2

Alberta

Quebec

Atlantic

Prairies1

Based on reported outstanding balances

Delinquency Rates3 Q4’15 Q1’16 Q2’16 Q3’164

Transactional 0.31% 0.34% 0.33% n.a.

Portfolio 0.08% 0.09% 0.06% n.a.

Total 0.21% 0.23% 0.20% n.a.

Company sources. 1 Prairies include MB and SK. 2 BC includes the Territories. 3 Delinquency rates are based on outstanding insured mortgage balances as at the end of the

quarter and exclude delinquencies that have been incurred but not reported. 4 Outstanding insured mortgage balances are reported on a one quarter lag.

• Increased net new delinquencies,

primarily in oil-producing regions

• 2016 full year loss ratio range

remains: 25 – 35%

New delinquencies, net of cures, by region

Ontario

Pacific2

Alberta

Quebec

Atlantic

Prairies1

Total

Delinquencies outstanding

Total

105 96 77 36 42

42 31

40

17 25

75 89

183

125

234

116 156

138

63

93 76

82

92

59

66 26

33

38

52

33

Q3'15 Q4'15 Q1'16 Q2'16 Q3'16

440

487

568

352

493

Loss ratio 21% 23% 24% 21% 25%

QoQ

+141

-19

+7

+30

+109

+8

+6

Page 8: Third Quarter 2016 Resultss1.q4cdn.com/456119668/files/doc_presentations/2016/MIC...November 4th, 2016 Third Quarter 2016 Results Q3 2016 Results Genworth MI Canada Inc. 2 Forward-looking

8 Genworth MI Canada Inc. Q3 2016 Results

Solid financial performance

$MM except EPS & BVPS Q3’16 Q2’16 Q3’15

Transactional premiums written $201 $170 $236

Portfolio premiums written 22 78 24

Total premiums written $223 $249 $260

Premiums earned 162 158 148

Losses on claims (41) (32) (31)

Expenses (33) (30) (28)

Underwriting income $88 $95 $89

Net investment income (excl. realized gains / losses)

44 44 42

Net operating income $93 $99 $92

Operating EPS (diluted)

$1.02 $1.07 $1.00

Book value per share (diluted, incl. AOCI)

$39.01 $38.23 $36.14

Q3 highlights

• Transactional premiums written lower by

15% Y/Y, primarily due to lower volumes,

partially offset by a higher average

premium rate

• Premiums earned increased Q/Q by $4

million as expected

• Loss ratio of 25%, up 4 pts Q/Q on higher

new delinquencies, net of cures and a

modest increase in the average reserve per

delinquency primarily related to Alberta

• Net investment income flat Q/Q at $44

million

• Net operating income down $5 million Q/Q

primarily due to higher losses on claims,

partly offset by higher premiums earned

• Book value per share up 8% Y/Y to $39.01

Company sources. Note: Amounts may not total due to rounding.

Page 9: Third Quarter 2016 Resultss1.q4cdn.com/456119668/files/doc_presentations/2016/MIC...November 4th, 2016 Third Quarter 2016 Results Q3 2016 Results Genworth MI Canada Inc. 2 Forward-looking

9 Genworth MI Canada Inc. Q3 2016 Results

Solid underwriting profitability

89 90 88 95 88

28 27 28 30

33

31 35 37 32 41

Q3' 15 Q4' 15 Q1' 16 Q2' 16 Q3' 16

Underwriting profitability ($ millions)

Net underwriting

income

Expenses

Losses on claims

Loss ratio 21% 23% 24% 21% 25%

Expense ratio 19% 18% 19% 19% 20%

Combined

ratio 40% 41% 42% 40% 45%

Avg. reserve

per delq. ($000s) $70.4 $71.9 $70.9 $75.4 $79.5

New delqs.

net of cures 440 487 568 352 493

Premiums earned $158 $148 $151 $154 $162

Highlights

• Single up-front premium model provides visibility

into future premiums earned:

• Eight consecutive quarters of Q/Q

increases… higher level of premiums written

in last three years driving trend of increased

premiums earned

• Flat to modest Q/Q increases in premiums

earned expected for next 12 months

• YTD loss ratio at 23%; 2016 full year range

remains 25% to 35%

• New delinquencies net of cures increased by

Q/Q by in Alberta (109) and Quebec (30)

• Average reserve per delinquency increased

modestly primarily due to higher Alberta mix

Company sources.

Page 10: Third Quarter 2016 Resultss1.q4cdn.com/456119668/files/doc_presentations/2016/MIC...November 4th, 2016 Third Quarter 2016 Results Q3 2016 Results Genworth MI Canada Inc. 2 Forward-looking

10 Genworth MI Canada Inc. Q3 2016 Results

Federals

Provincials

Preferred shares

Emerging markets debt3

Investment grade

corporates2

Cash4

32%

16%

35%

6%

6%

5%

Investments contribute steady income

Duration: 3.8 years

Book yield: 3.2%1

Invested assets (C$ millions, unless noted)

Note: Company sources.

1. Represents market value. Book yield represents pre-tax equivalent book yield after dividend gross-up of portfolio (as at September 30, 2016).

2. Market value, includes CLOs. 3. ~99% Investment grade. 4. Cash includes short-term investments. 5. Excludes realized and unrealized gains and losses.

Total Invested Assets ($6.2B portfolio1) Net Investment Income ($ millions)5

$5,917

$5,867

MAINTAINING QUALITY FOCUS IN LOW RATE ENVIRONMENT ... SELECTIVELY ADDING

INVESTMENT GRADE PREFERRED SHARES WITH ATTRACTIVE YIELD

$104 million of

maturities in

Q4 2016

5,798 5,940

282 305

Q2 2016 Q3 2016

Book value

Net

unrealized

gain

$6.1B $6.2B

Investment

yield 3.3.% 3.2%

$42 $41

$42 $44

$42 $44

$44

2015 YTD Q3'16

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

$169

$130

Page 11: Third Quarter 2016 Resultss1.q4cdn.com/456119668/files/doc_presentations/2016/MIC...November 4th, 2016 Third Quarter 2016 Results Q3 2016 Results Genworth MI Canada Inc. 2 Forward-looking

11 Genworth MI Canada Inc. Q3 2016 Results

MCT ratio 236% 155% to 158%

Holding Target 220% n.a.

MCT Supervisory

Target 150% 150%

Holdco cash2 ($ millions)

$181 $181

Capital management

Note: Company sources. 1. Market risk includes interest rate, credit, equity risk, and foreign exchange risk.

MCT denotes ratio for operating insurance company. 3Q16 MCT based on company estimates.

2. Represents liquid investments and cash held in addition to capital in operating insurance company.

Regulatory capital as at September 30th, 2016 (by category, $ millions unless otherwise noted)

Highlights

Increased dividend by 5% to $0.44 per

common share

New Capital framework expected to be

effective January 1, 2017

• Expect 220% Holding Target to be

re-calibrated to 150% MCT Supervisory

Target

• Awaiting confirmation of the Government

Guarantee MCT Minimum (previously

175% vs. 150% Supervisory target)

Transitional provision limits increase in

capital requirements for insurance risk on:

• Legacy extended amortization mortgages

(amortization > 25 years)

• Portfolio insured mortgages originated

prior to Dec. 31, 2016

For capital required for operational risk,

three year transition period expected

2,506

410

584

262

Current Advisory Pro-forma Draft Advisory

3,762

Insurance Risk

Market Risk1

Operational Risk

Capital in excess

of 220%

Capital in

excess of

150%

Page 12: Third Quarter 2016 Resultss1.q4cdn.com/456119668/files/doc_presentations/2016/MIC...November 4th, 2016 Third Quarter 2016 Results Q3 2016 Results Genworth MI Canada Inc. 2 Forward-looking

12 Genworth MI Canada Inc. Q3 2016 Results

Overview of new capital framework

• Unearned Premiums

Reserve

• Reserve for Incurred But

Not Reported Losses on

Claims

Premium

Liabilities

Triggered When Price to

Income Metric Exceeds

OSFI Prescribed

Threshold:

• Toronto

• Vancouver

• Calgary

• Edmonton

• Victoria

Supplemental

Requirement

More Risk Sensitive Based

on:

• Outstanding Balance

• Modified LTV

• Remaining Amortization

• Credit Score

Base

Requirement

Total Assets Required =

= Capital Required for Insurance Risk

+ -

CREATES APPROPRIATE PRICING INCENTIVE ... FOR EXAMPLE:

HIGHER PREMIUM RATE REDUCES CAPITAL REQUIREMENT

Page 13: Third Quarter 2016 Resultss1.q4cdn.com/456119668/files/doc_presentations/2016/MIC...November 4th, 2016 Third Quarter 2016 Results Q3 2016 Results Genworth MI Canada Inc. 2 Forward-looking

13 Genworth MI Canada Inc. Q3 2016 Results

New capital framework LTV illustration

Total Asset Requirement by LTV (New vs. current framework, by LTV, 730 credit score at issue; $300k mortgage)

• Premium rate increases likely in 2017 in response to higher capital levels from proposed base and

supplementary requirement

Table above based on Sept. 23rd, 2016 OSFI draft advisory entitled “Capital Requirements for Federally Regulated Mortgage Insurers”.

* New Base Requirement and New Combined Base & Supplementary Requirement are shown at 150% MCT.

** Current Required Capital for insurance risk is calculated at 220% MCT.

Highlights

Page 14: Third Quarter 2016 Resultss1.q4cdn.com/456119668/files/doc_presentations/2016/MIC...November 4th, 2016 Third Quarter 2016 Results Q3 2016 Results Genworth MI Canada Inc. 2 Forward-looking

14 Genworth MI Canada Inc. Q3 2016 Results

Keen focus on risk management

Proactive loss mitigation

programs

Investing in our customer

experience strategy

Key takeaways

Proven business model has positioned

MIC for future

performance

Balanced approach to writing

new business

Page 15: Third Quarter 2016 Resultss1.q4cdn.com/456119668/files/doc_presentations/2016/MIC...November 4th, 2016 Third Quarter 2016 Results Q3 2016 Results Genworth MI Canada Inc. 2 Forward-looking

15 Genworth MI Canada Inc. Q3 2016 Results

[email protected] investor.genworthmicanada.ca

Investor Relations

Jonathan A. Pinto, MBA, LL.M

Vice President, Investor Relations

[email protected] 905.287.5482