third quarter 2004 financial results

38
Third Quarter 2004 Financial Results

Upload: indiya

Post on 12-Jan-2016

32 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Third Quarter 2004 Financial Results. Safe Harbor Statement. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

Third Quarter 2004 Financial Results

Page 2: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

2

Safe Harbor Statement

This Investor Presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions and typically can be identified by the use of words such as “expect,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “forecast,” “plan,” “believe” and similar terms. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, expected earnings, future growth and financial performance, the sufficiency of the disputed claims reserve, the successful closing of announced transactions, the successful refinancing of our credit agreement, the successful closing of coal transportation agreements, the successful implementation of our acquisition and repowering strategy, and the EBITDA impact of the RMR settlement. Although NRG believes that its expectations are reasonable, it can give no assurance that these expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual results may vary materially. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated above include, among others, general economic conditions, hazards customary in the power industry, competition in wholesale power markets, the volatility of energy and fuel prices, failure of customers to perform under contracts, changes in the wholesale power markets and related government regulation, the condition of capital markets generally, our ability to access capital markets, unanticipated outages at generation facilities, our ability to convert facilities to western coal, our substantial indebtedness and the possibility that we may incur additional indebtedness, adverse results in current and future litigation, delays in or failure to meet closing conditions in announced transactions, failure to identify or successfully implement acquisitions and repowerings, the amount of proceeds from asset sales and failure to obtain FERC approval of the RMR settlement.

NRG undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The adjusted EBITDA guidance is an estimate as of November 9, 2004 and is based on assumptions believed to be reasonable as of that date. NRG disclaims any current intention to update such guidance from November 9, 2004. The foregoing review of factors that could cause NRG’s actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in the forward-looking statements included in this Investor Presentation should be considered in connection with information regarding risks and uncertainties that may affect NRG's future results included in NRG's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov.

Page 3: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

3

Agenda

Third Quarter Overview Financial Highlights Operating Performance Review Portfolio Management International Current Focus

Financial Results Review 3rd Quarter and YTD Results Liquidity Update Capital Allocation Plan

Questions and Answers

Page 4: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

4

Third quarter performance Adjusted EBITDA of $272 million Net cash flow of $284 million

YTD performance Adjusted EBITDA of $762 million Net cash flow of $554 million Liquidity increased nearly $450 million to $1.6 billion

Net Debt/Capital Ratio1

Improved to 50% from 60% since the beginning of 2004

Financial HighlightsFinancial Highlights

1 Excludes $200 million in operating cash and Kendall

Page 5: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

5

Q3 Operating Highlights

South Central generation was 27% higher in Q3 2004 than Q3 2003 due to strong performance from Big Cajun 2

Northeast generation was down 22% due to milder weather which limited runtimes at our intermediate and peaking facilities

Equivalent Availability – is the total available hours a unit is available in a year minus the summation of all partial outage events in a year converted to Equivalent Hours (EH) where EH is partial megawatts lost divided by unit Net Available Capacity times hours of each event and the net of these hours is divided by hours in a year to achieve Equivalent Availability Factor in percent.

RegionNet

Generation (MWH)

Equivalent Availability (%)

Average Heat Rate (Btu/nKwh)

Net Capacity Factor (%)

Net Owned Capacity

Northeast 2,983,705 87% 11,289 38.5% 7,884

South Central 3,424,242 99% 10,551 71.8% 2,469

West 1,010,456 88% 11,425 19.1% 1,321

Page 6: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

6

2004 Gross Margin

Gross Margin ($ thousands) 3Q YTD

Dark Spread 1,2 $59,131 $230,164

Gas Spread $ 6,929 $ 10,463

Dual Fuel/Oil Spread $11,299 $ 48,839

In Q3, gross margin from dual fuel and coal fired generation impacted by mild weather No generation from Oswego Norwalk Harbor responsible for majority of dual fuel/oil

gross margin

1 Dark spread is the spread between energy prices and coal-fired generation costs2 Does not include LaGen contracted output

Page 7: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

7

Portfolio Management-2004 Noncore Asset SalesPortfolio Management-2004 Noncore Asset Sales

Sold for value Minimal proceeds

leakage to advisors Minimal tax

leakage

Name LocationActual or expected

cash proceeds(Millions)

Balance Sheet Debt

(Millions)

Status

Loy Yang A Australia $27 N/A Completed Q2

Cobee Bolivia $50 $24 Completed Q2

Calpine Cogen Various, U.S. $3 N/A Completed Q1

PERC Maine $18 $25 Completed Q2

Illinois $1 $450Kendall Executed PSA

TOTAL $156 $993

Batesville Mississippi $27 $292 Completed Q3

Oklahoma N/A $157McClain Completed Q3

Taiwan N/A $45Hsin Yu Completed Q2

Various $12 N/ANEO Projects Completed Q3

Virginia $4 N/AJames River Executed PSA

Virginia $14 N/ACALP Executed PSA

Itiquira Brazil $? ? Sale in Progress

Enfield U.K. $? N/A Sale in Progress

Saguaro Nevada $? N/A Sale in Progress

Page 8: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

8

Portfolio Management - Connecticut

Plants MWs Regulatory Status 2004E EBITDA Impact

Devon 11-14, Montville, Middletown

1,392 2004-2005 RMR $91.2 million

Devon 7 and 8 1 214 Both units deactivated by Oct. 1, 2004

$ 7.7 million

Norwalk Harbor 353 PUSH bidding continues until LICAP is in place

$39.5 million

Reached Settlement with CT Authorities related to RMR: Settlement with multiple CT parties eliminates refund risk Settlement provides for 2004 and 2005 certainty Effectively bridges us to scheduled LICAP introduction by

1/1/06

1 Devon 7 deactivated 10/1/2004, Devon 8 deactivated 6/1/2004

Page 9: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

9

Portfolio Management - California

Plant Net MWs

Regulatory Status

Potential Alternative Use Value (AUV)

Source of AUV

Cabrillo I 482 RMR Highest Commercial Real Estate; Desalination

Cabrillo II 93 RMR None N/A

El Segundo 335 TBD High Commercial Real Estate; Power Redevelopment

Long Beach 265 Market Marginal Port Usage

No solution yet, but progress is being made. Signals are positive:

CPUC ordered acceleration of excess reserve requirements from 1/1/08 to 6/1/06

RMR status for Cabrillo I and Cabrillo II successfully extended through 2005

Additional requests for offer have been initiated by California’s LSE in recent weeks

Veto of AB2006, support for AB57, pro-competition appointments to CAISO, Interim Procurement Order (7/8/04) from CPUC

Page 10: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

10

International - Australia

What value added does our Australian portfolio provide? Significant, predominately contracted, EBITDA Properly functioning market, countercyclical to U.S regional

markets Portfolio dominated by low-in-the-merit-order black coal plants Operations know-how, technical and commercial, across the

portfolio Ability to dividend cash to parent through refinancing

NRG FacilitiesNRG Facilities

Gladstone

Flinders Adelaide

Page 11: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

11

Current Focus: Wrap up of Back to BasicsCurrent Focus: Wrap up of Back to Basics

Operational Priorities

4. Internal audit plan 2005

1. 2004 Guidance

3. CAPEX approval template

2. Capital Allocation strategy

5. Risk Mgmt self-assessment

X

First 100 Days 11/11 Second 100 Days 12/15

4. Resolve Connecticut

1. Safe, reliable, efficient

3. Maintain momentum inasset sale program

2. Increase contracted portionof merchant generation

Financial Priorities

1. Simplify cap structure

3. Reduce borrowing cost

2. Enhance liquidity

Organizational Priorities

2. Phase-out of advisers

3. Redirect mgmt team

4. Restructure corp org

1. New CFO

2. Germany & Australia

1. Regional strategic plans

2. Function specific transition plan

3. 3rd party advisor cost control

4. Incentive compensation scheme

1. Hire key staff

X

4. Resolve California

1. Summer Operations

3. Sell Kendall

2. Advance contract positionfor winter ’04-’05

X

Third 100 Days ?/16

4. Resolve California

3. Itiquira and Enfield

2. Hedge gas exposure

5. Process control cost savings initiative

3. Internal audit plan 2005

1. Address senior debt facility

2. File S-4

4. Sarbanes-Oxley compliance

3. 3rd party advisor cost control

4. Comp. scheme detailed roll out

1. Complete PMI transition

2. New business/brownfield strategy

1. Translate strategic plan into 2005 budget

6. Implement coal strategy

2. Succession Plan

1. Winter operation preparedness

Operational Priorities

Strategic Priorities

Financial Priorities

Organizational Priorities

Operational Priorities

Strategic Priorities

Financial Priorities

Organizational Priorities

Page 12: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

12

Current Focus – Hedging

Active hedging program focused on 4 key drivers:

Coal dark spreads currently high – driven by natural gas-related increase in power prices

Gas spark spreads very compressed and not attractive at current levels

Coal portfolio leveraging scale and flexibility

Oil spark spreads remain volatile, driven by weather and natural gas prices

Page 13: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

13

Current Focus – HedgingNYC Gas Spark Spread: Winter/Summer ‘05 On-Peak

Summer2005

Winter2005

Note: Indicative spark spread trend using Transco Z6 NY @ 10 mmbtu/Mwh heat rate

Spark spreads have compressed with rising natural gas prices and do not represent attractive hedging opportunities at current market levels

25

27

29

31

33

35

37

39

July-04 August-04 September-04 October-04

$/M

Wh

6

6.5

7

7.5

8

$/m

mbtu

NYC Spark Spread

Natural Gas

-10

-5

0

5

10

July-04 August-04 September-04 October-04

$/M

Wh

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

$/m

mbtu

NYC Spark Spread

Natural Gas

Page 14: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

14

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

July-04 August-04 September-04 October-04

$/M

Wh

NY West Dark Spread on Oil

Current Focus – HedgingNY West Oil Spark Spread: Winter ‘05 On-Peak

Note: Indicative spark spread on #6 oil 1% @ 12 mmbtu/MWh heat rate

Forward oil spark spreads have increased with NG related rise in power prices

Spot oil margins are highly dependent on natural gas prices and weather: we are taking a balanced approach.

Winter hedges increased to ~60%

Page 15: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

15

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

50.00

55.00

60.00

J uly-04 August-04 September-04 October-04

$/

MW

h

5

5.5

6

6.5

7

7.5

8

8.5

$/

mm

btu

NY West Dark Spread

Nymex Natural Gas

Current Focus – HedgingNY West Dark Spread: Cal ‘05 On-Peak

Note: Indicative trend for dark spread on coal @ 10 mmbtu/MWh heat rate

Dark spreads have increased with rising natural gas prices providing favorable hedging opportunities for coal margins

Winter hedges increased to 98%Calendar ‘05 hedges increased to 75%

Winter hedged 53%Calendar ‘05 hedged 34%

Page 16: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

16

Coal market dynamics have been challenging High eastern U.S. coal prices Transportation congestion Low stockpiles

We expect strong coal pricing to continue into 2005

Western U.S. coal has remained relatively stable These challenges are manageable

Current Focus – HedgingCoal Market Outlook

Page 17: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

17

Current Focus – Hedging

Huntley760 MW1.4 MM tons/year

Dunkirk600 MW2.0 MM tons/year

Somerset136 MW250 k tons/year

Indian River784 MW 1.0 MM tons/year

Big Cajun1489 MW7.8 MM tons/year

Dover106 MW 70 k tons/year

Coal Supply

2004 2005

Import 100 k 200 k

Eastern U.S. 3.0 MM 1.0 MM

Western U.S. 9.4 MM 11.3 MM

NRG Coal Generation Fleet: 12.5 million tons/year

Reducing reliance on Eastern US Coal

Page 18: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

18

Current Focus – Hedging

UPBNCSXNSVesselBarge

UPBNCSXNSVesselBarge

The Four Key Components of Coal Supply1. Transportation Infrastructure (railcars, barges, vessels)2. Transportation Service (railroads, shipping companies)3. Coal Storage/Transshipment (Conneaut, ACT, DTA)4. Coal Supply (producers and other suppliers)

Coal strategy must first meet environmental remediation and compliance

Coal Portfolio: Competitive advantage through scale and optionality across the 4 Key Components of Supply

Page 19: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

19

Current Focus – Hedging Summary

Currently we focus on: Hedging coal and oil margins opportunistically to allow us

to capture recent gas related increases in power prices Remaining largely unhedged on gas margins to optimize

upside swings Leveraging optionality in coal supply and transportation

to minimize delivered cost of fuel

Our positions are never static; we actively manage our portfolio as market conditions change

Our hedging program focuses on balancing upside potential against downside uncertainties.

Page 20: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

Financial and Operating Results

Page 21: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

21

Operating revenues 607 1,781

Gross margin 342 1,025

Net income 54167

EBITDA 224752

Adjusted EBITDA 272762

$ millions$ millions

Key Financial HighlightsKey Financial Highlights

YTDYTDQ3Q3

Page 22: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

22

EBITDA by Operating Segment

($ millions)

Q3 EBITDA

Q3 Adj.

Q3 Adj. EBITDA

YTD Adj. EBITDA

Northeast 110 - 110 303.5

South Central 30 - 30 92.0

West Coast 47 - 47 135.5

Other North America 6 32 38 72.5

Australia 9 - 9 60.2

Other International 34 - 34 72.5

Alternative Energy 5 .5 6 11.0

Nongeneration 12 - 12 38.0

Corp - Unallocated (29) 15 (14) (23.2)

Total 224 48 272 762.0

Page 23: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

23

Cash Flow YTD

$ in millions YTD

EBITDA 752

Interest Payments (193)

Income Tax (27)

Other Funds used by Operations (66)

FFO 466

Working Capital Changes 4

Xcel Settlement, net 125

CFO 595

Asset Divestitures 276

CapEx (78)

Other Cash used by Investing 13

FX Rate Changes & Disc Ops (25)

FCF 782

Cash Used by Financing (228)

Net Cash Flow 554

Page 24: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

24

Liquidity

12/30/03 09/30/04

Unrestricted Cash:

Domestic 418 936

International 134 169

Restricted Cash:

Domestic 70 94

International 46 55

Total Cash 668 1,254

Letter of Credit Availability 248 97

Revolver Availability 250 250

Total Current Liquidity $1,166 $1,601

$ millions

Page 25: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

25

Capital Allocation Planning-Threshold Issue

Examples of Restrictive Covenants Senior Debt Facility High-Yield Note Indenture

Permitted Acquisition Indebtedness

Up to $100MM secured by acquired assets plus debt

reduced by asset sales

$150MM basket, plus $250MM general basket

plus ratio debt

General Unrestricted Investment Basket

Up to $150MM Up to $200MM

Use of CashMandatory prepayment

obligations applyDoes not apply

Return of Capital to Shareholders-Dividend

-Share Repurchase-Special Dividend

Not allowed$50MM plus 50% of

retained earnings plus proceeds of equity issued

Reinvestment in Existing AssetsCapex limited to

$150MM/yearDoes not apply

Acquisition of Additional Assets Various basketsIncurrence test dictates

debt amount

At this point in the Company’s development, the Senior Debt Facility terms and conditions are excessively restrictive, resulting in inefficient allocation of capital

Page 26: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

26

Refinancing Rationale

Improved Pricing: The Company expects pricing to improve significantly, due to improvement in market conditions

Less Restrictive Covenants: The covenants on the new credit facilities will more closely resemble those in the indenture for the existing second priority senior secured notes

Maintain Liquidity: The Company will maintain liquidity through:

$150 million Revolving Credit Facility

$350 million Pre-Funded Letter of Credit Facility

Cash Balances

While we have the liquidity, it does not make sense for us simply to repay the facility since it is low cost capital

Page 27: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

27

Capital Allocation Plan-Beyond the Threshold

Maintaining progress towards achieving our target net debt/total capital ratio is fundamental

Objective is to keep substantial, but not excessive, liquidity inside the business

Cost of modifying in a material way the terms of the bond indenture make this option unattractive at this time

Page 28: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

28

2004 Outlook

$ in millions ReportedOutlook

Adjustment RecurringOutlook

Forecasted Adjusted EBITDA1 865 10 875

Interest Payments (278) 15 (263)

Income Tax (32) – (32)

Other Cash Used by Operations (40) – (40)

FFO 515 25 540

Working Capital Changes (60) – (60)

Xcel Settlement, net 100 (100) –

CFO 555 (75) 480

Asset Divestitures 156 (156) –

CapEx (130) – (130)

Other Cash used by Investing (7) – (7)

FCF 574 (231) 343

1Includes $42.4 million of Kendall EBITDA and does not include any costs associated with a potential refinancing

Page 29: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

29

$2.0 million100 bpsInterest rates

$0.7 million$1.00/mmbtuNatural Gas

--$1.00/tonCoal

Results in the following change to

2004 pre-tax income:SensitivityFactors

Sensitivities are for the remaining 3 months of 2004, assuming current hedged positions

2004 Forecast Sensitivity Analysis2004 Forecast Sensitivity Analysis

NRG has substantially hedged operating gross margin for the remainder of the year

--$1.00/barrelOil

Page 30: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

30

Enterprise Value

As of 9/30/04 $ in millions Supported Nonsupported Kendall Total

Consolidated Debt $ 3,053 $ 558 $ 0 $ 3,611

Unrestricted Cash 1,086 19 1,105

Restricted Cash 75 74 149

Total Cash 1,161 93 1,254

Net Debt $ 1,892 $ 465 $ 2,357

Equity Value $ 2,925 – $ 2,925

Enterprise Value $ 4,817 $ 465 $ 5,282

2004 Forecasted Adj. EBITDA $ 765 $ 68 $ 42 $ 875

TEV / FY Adjusted EBITDA 6.3x

1 Debt balances do not include Kendall but EBITDA contains $42.4 million from Kendall

Page 31: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

31

$18

$20

$22

$24

$26

$28

$30

12/2/03 2/24/04 5/18/04 8/10/04 11/2/04

Capital Markets Performance

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

Dec-03 Jan-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 Jun-04 Jul-04 Aug-04 Oct-04CSFB HY Index CSFB BB Index NRG Energy

NRG’s share price has increased over 40% since exiting from bankruptcy, and the Company’s High-Yield Notes are trading at a yield of 6.2%.

Share Price Performance Second Priority Notes – Yield to Worst

Second Priority Notes – Spread to Worst

Maintaining a balance is good for equity and debt holders

200

300

400

500

600

Dec-03 Jan-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 Jun-04 Jul-04 Aug-04 Oct-04

CSFB HY Index CSFB BB Index NRG Energy

Page 32: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

32

Q&A

Page 33: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

Appendix

Page 34: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

34

Debt Schedule (US $mm) – 9/30/2004

S Xcel Note 9.1

S Senior Credit Facility 691.3

S 8% Notes 1736.7

Camas 11.1

Conemaugh 0.2

NEO Northbrook 25.6

NEO NY 16.7

Peakers 245

S Processing-Capital Lease 0.1

S Thermal San Francisco 0.3

S Thermal Pittsburgh 0.4

S Thermal 127

S Meriden 0.5

Audrain-Capital Lease 239.9

S Schkopau-Capital Lease 286.4

Itiquira-ST Debt 19.4

S Flinders 201.5

Total consolidated $ 3611.2“S” indicates Supported Project as discussed on Slide 29

Page 35: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

35

YTD Operational Statistics – 9/30/04

RegionNet

Generation (MWH)

Equivalent Availability

(%)

Average Heat Rate

(Btu/nKwh)

Net Capacity

Factor (%)

Net Owned

Capacity

Northeast 8,508,652 80% 11,123 36.5% 7,884

South Central

9,306,924 91% 10,584 65.0% 2,469

West 2,806,300 78% 10,849 17.9% 1,321

Page 36: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

36

Adj. Net Income GAAP Reconciliation

Adjusted Net Income ReconciliationThe following table summarizes the calculation of adjusted net income and provides a reconciliation to GAAP net income/(loss), including per share amounts:

Three Months Ended YTD

Reorganized NRG

Predecessor NRG

September 30, 2004

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

September 30, 2004

Diluted EPS September 30, 2003

Diluted EPS

Net Income (Loss) $ 54,221 $ 0.54 $ (284,794)

$ 167,480

$ 1.67

Plus:

(Income) Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax

(400) (0.01) (374)

(915) (0.01)

(Gain) Loss from Discontinued Operations

(10,491) (0.10) 624

(22,389) (0.22)

Corporate relocation charges, net of tax 4,296 0.04 - 8,607

0.08

Reorganization items, net of tax (3,944) (0.04) 20,305

(1,143) (0.01)

Restructuring and impairment charges, net of tax

30,461 0.30 6,133

29,106 0.29

FERC-authorized settlement with Connecticut Light and Power, net of tax

- - - (26,466) (0.26)

Write down of Note Receivable, net of tax 3,438 0.04 - 3,155

0.03

Write downs and (gains)/losses on sales of equity method investments, net of tax

10,170 0.10 (12,064)

13,776

0.14

Adjusted Net Income $ 87,751 $ 0.87 $ (270,170)

$ 171,211

$ 1.71

Page 37: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

37

Adj. EBITDA GAAP ReconciliationThree Months Ended YTD

Reorganized NRG

Predecessor NRG

September 30, 2004

September 30, 2003

September 30, 2004

(Dollars in thousands)

Net Income / (Loss) $ 54,221 $ (284,794) $ 167,480

Plus:

Income Tax Expense 14,264 5,437 64,866

Interest expense, excluding amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount/ (premium)

61,061 30,932 193,260

Depreciation and amortization 51,373 56,510 159,547

WCP CDWR contract amortization (included in equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates)

28,098 - 89,704

Amortization of power contracts 3,715 - 29,294

Amortization of emission credits 4,919 - 14,837

Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount/(premium) 5,822 3,492 32,994

EBITDA $ 223,473 $ (188,423) $ 751,982

Plus:

(Income) Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of Income Taxes (400) (374) (915)

(Gain) Loss from Discontinued Operations (10,491) 624 (22,389)

Corporate relocation charges 5,713 - 12,474

Reorganization items (5,245) 20,698 (1,656)

Restructuring and impairment charges 40,507 6,252 42,183

FERC-authorized settlement with Connecticut Light and Power - - (38,357)

Write down of Note Receivable 4,572 - 4,572

Write downs and (gains)/losses on sales of equity method investments 13,524 (12,310) 14,057

Adjusted EBITDA $ 271,653 $ (173,533) $ 761,951

Page 38: Third Quarter 2004  Financial Results

38

GAAP Reconciliation

EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income are nonGAAP financial measures. These measurements are not recognized in accordance with GAAP and should not be viewed as an alternative to GAAP measures of performance. The presentation of Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income should not be construed as an inference that NRG’s future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items.

EBITDA represents net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is presented because NRG considers it an important supplemental measure of its performance and believes debt-holders frequently use EBITDA to analyze operating performance and debt service capacity. EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our operating results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:• EBITDA does not reflect cash expenditures, or future requirements for capital expenditures, or contractual commitments;• EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, working capital needs;• EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on debts;• Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; and• Other companies in this industry may calculate EBITDA differently than NRG does, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.

Because of these limitations, EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to use to invest in the growth of NRG’s business. NRG compensates for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA only supplementally. See the statements of cash flow included in the financial statements that are a part of this press release.

Adjusted EBITDA is presented as a further supplemental measure of operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA adjusted for reorganization, restructuring, impairment and corporate relocation charges, discontinued operations, and write downs and losses on the sales of equity method investments; factors which we do not consider indicative of future operating performance. The reader is encouraged to evaluate each adjustment and the reasons NRG considers it appropriate for supplemental analysis. As an analytical tool, Adjusted EBITDA is subject to all of the limitations applicable to EBITDA. In addition, in evaluating Adjusted EBITDA, the reader should be aware that in the future NRG may incur expenses similar to the adjustments in this presentation.

Similar to Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted net income represents net income adjusted for reorganization, restructuring, impairment and corporate relocation charges, discontinued operations, and write downs and losses on the sales of equity method investments; factors which we do not consider indicative of future operating performance. The reader is encouraged to evaluate each adjustment and the reasons NRG considers it appropriate for supplemental analysis. In addition, in evaluating Adjusted net income, the reader should be aware that in the future NRG may incur expenses similar to the adjustments in this presentation.