thinking and language. what is the sum of 362 and 499? you found campbell’s soup on aisle 10 at...
TRANSCRIPT
Thinking and Language
Thinking and Language
• What is the sum of 362 and 499?• You found Campbell’s soup on aisle 10 at
Harris Teeter; where will you find Lipton’s soup?
• Chapel Hill and Duke both offer you a scholarship. How will you choose which college to attend?
Thinking
• The mental activity that is involved in the understanding, processing, and communicating of information.
• Your answer to the three questions each required a different type of thinking
THINKING SYMBOLS
Symbols
• An object or an act that stands for something else
Your mental images are a type of symbol—when you think of a dog, you are thinking of a symbol of a dog
THINKING SYMBOLS CONCEPTS
Concepts
• A mental structure used to categorize objects, people, or events that share similar characteristics– Think of an animal– What makes it an animal?– You have used the concept animal to create a new
item that fits into the animal category– Now put that animal in a tree eating fruit—there is
a relationship now between animal, tree, and fruit
Concepts
• A concept is a category containing many examples
• Concepts are organized into hierarchies
ANIMALS
MAMMALS
Dogs, Whales, etc.
Concepts
• Learned through experience• Learning about concepts such as fairness,
beauty, goodness more challenging than learning what is a dog, a ball, a vegetable
• KEY: A concept is a type of symbol because it stands for something else
THINKING SYMBOLS CONCEPTS PROTOTYPES
Prototypes
• The most typical example of an object or event within a category
• Think of a shoe• Any of these come to mind?
Prototype Activity
Objectives & Agenda
• Continue to develop an understanding of Thinking and Language– Students will recover prior learning on symbols,
concepts, and prototypes through an activity that engages your prior knowledge, encourages collaboration, and challenges your creativity
– Students will study, analyze, and experiment with the several ways people use to solve problems
– Students will identify obstacles to problem solving
Warm-up: Putting this all together…
• When developing a thought, a single-word concept emerges: feathers
• Now combine that concept with another: beak• Connect those concepts to a third: eggs• And one more: fly• What comes to mind?
ing
Something like this?
Why not these two?
Groups: Comic activity
• Break into groups of three as I’ve assigned• Each group will draw a name from a hat
(done) and you will create a cartoon that illustrates how people use this unit (symbol, concept, prototype) in their daily lives.
Cognitive processes
Watch the video and answer the questions on the viewing guide
Problem Solving
• Faced with a problem we do what?– Involves a series of processes including analyzing
the problem, breaking it down into component parts, and establishing goals
Warm-up
• A prisoner was attempting to escape from a tower. He found in his cell a rope, which was half long enough to permit him to reach the ground safely. He divided the rope in half and tied the two parts together and escaped. How could he have done this?
• If you have black socks and brown socks in your drawer, mixed in a ratio of 4 to 5, how many socks will you have to take out to make sure that you have a pair the same color?
Answers:
• Unwind the rope and tie the ends together• Three - if the first is brown and the second
black then the third one will match either the brown or black.
Problem Solving
• Turn in your textbook to page 180 and try and solve problems A-E; team up with someone to try and complete all six in ten minutes
Problem-solving strategies
• Algorithm: problem solving strategy– Usually involves trying random solutions to a
problem in a systematic way– is an example– Often complex and time-consuming
• Heuristics: rules of thumb, shortcuts– Faster than algorithms, not as reliable
Examples
• C L _ F F– Use algorithm (systematic approach)– A, E, I, O, U
• C _ _ F F– Algorithm approach (slow, two letters)– Heuristic—recall linguistic rules; must have a vowel, what
letters can’t follow a C
Another Example
• C _ _ C H–Algorithm?–Heuristic?
• CZECH
Problem-Solving Methods
• Trial and error– We know the goal, have no idea how to reach it– Just keep trying different things– Similar to systematic searching– Not very reliable
Problem-solving methods
• Difference Reduction– 1) Identify goal– 2) determine where we are in relation to it and
the direction we must go to move closer to it• We reduce the difference between where we
are (problem unresolved) and our desired situation (problem solved).
• A heuristic method, not always reliable
Difference reduction
• Problem A in Figure 8.1 illustrative– One step forward, two steps back– If you want to go north, sometimes you first must
go south– Sometimes must increase the distance between
current location and goal to ultimately get there• Asks, “in what direction must I move to get
from A to B?”
Means-End Analysis
• Aims to reduce the difference between where we are (problem) and where we want to be (solution)
• Particular action has particular effect• Asks, “what can I do to get there?”• Break a problem into parts, and then try and
solve each part individually– Following a recipe
Working Backward
• Similar to means-end analysis• Begin at the end, and work way back– What is the goal—start there
• Effective when you know what you need to accomplish but not sure how best to begin– Crossing a stream via stepping stones• Don’t just start from where you are—survey across the
stream to identify stones in the stream beginning at other shore
Analogies
• Similarity between two or more terms, events, or situations– Consider the analogy offered in your textbook on
page 184 as an analogy for solving Figure 8:1B• Always contain four parts:– Coat is to closet as car is to _____________
Insight and Incubation
• Insight is sudden understanding—arriving at a solution to a problem all of a sudden (“A-ha!”)
Kohler chimpanzee experiment
Insight & incubation
• Incubation effect: standing back from a problem for a period of time while some unconscious process within us continues to work it out. – Later the solution may come to us in a flash– Sometimes good to take a break from a difficult
problem
Obstacles to problem solving
• Mental set: approaching a problem with a solution that worked previously– Sometimes the same solution doesn’t work
The Three Jugs Problem
B-A-2C
Problems 1-5 all solved the same way; Problems 6-7 didn’t require as elaborate a solution (could have just worked around B)Our mental set got in the way!
=
Functional Fixedness: tendency to think of objects only in terms of their usual functions.• How did functional fixedness stand in
the way of solving problems D & E?
Problem Solving & Creativity
• Functional fixedness can be overcome by creativity
• Requires DIVERGENT rather than CONVERGENT thinking– Convergent thinking—limited to available facts– Divergent thinking—explore all options
Divergent thinking exercise
• Take two minutes and write down everything you can do with a
–BRICK• Following that, I have two other things
for you to complete…
AgendaStudents will be expert problem-solvers and able to differentiate between deductive and inductive reasoning• Recover prior learning: the ABCDE’s of problem solving• Introduction to Reasoning
– What is deductive reasoning– What is inductive reasoning
• Work independently to create study cards• Introduction to Decision Making & Judgment• Collaborative work on decision making balance sheet• Exit ticket: How do inductive and deductive reasoning
differ?
The ABCDEs of Problem Solving
• Assess the problem• Brainstorm approaches to the problem• Choose the approach that seems most likely to
work• Do it—try the most likely approach.• Evaluate the results
Bell-work
• No problem in life is too big to solve if you use the correct problem-solving method. Do you agree or disagree—EXPLAIN WHY?
Tower of Hanoi
Your task is to move the tower from the left peg to the right peg, moving only one disk at a time and never putting a larger disk on a smaller one
Tower of Hanoi
Solution: Move smallest disk to third peg; move middle disk to second peg; place smallest disk on top of middle disk; move largest disk to third peg; move smallest disk to first peg; place middle disk on top of largest disk; move smallest disk on top of middle disk.
Reasoning
• The use of information to reach conclusions• Two primary kinds of reasoning– Deductive– Inductive
Deductive Reasoning
• “Top-down” reasoning or logic• Reasoning from one or more general
statements (premises) to reach a conclusion– Premise: idea or statement that provides basic
information that allows us to draw conclusions
Deductive ReasoningPremise 1: All men are mortal.
Premise 2: Aristotle is a man.
Conclusion? Aristotle is mortal.
Deductive ReasoningAristotle (384-322 BC)• Greek philosopher• Taught Alexander the
Great• Syllogisms: form of
deductive reasoning• Major premise• Minor premise• Conclusion
Deductive ReasoningAristotle (384-322 BC)• All virtues are admirable• Patience is a virtue• Therefore…• Patience is admirable
• His goal: to construct valid arguments & valid conclusions if true premises could be discovered
Deductive reasoning
• South Korea is in Asia• The city of Seoul is in South Korea• Therefore…Seoul is in Asia.
Conclusion is always true when the premises are true.
Deductive Reasoning
• Faulty premises– Countries that are near each other have similar
languages– The United States and Mexico are near each other– Therefore, the United States and Mexico have
similar languages
– monty python
Inductive Reasoning
• Reason in the other direction—from individual facts/cases to reach a general conclusion
• Sometimes the conclusions are wrong even when the premises are correct
Inductive Reasoning• The United States and
Canada are near each other and have similar languages.
• Mexico, Nicaragua, and Guatemala are near each other and have similar languages.
• Therefore, countries that are near each other have similar languages. DOES NOT LOGICALLY
FOLLOW!!!
Inductive Reasoning
• Often impossible to prove an assumption reached by inductive reasoning to be true
• Confirmation bias: tendency to look for information that confirms one’s preconceived notions
• We use inductive reasoning all the time• Until we prove a hypothesis false, we assume
it is true
Inductive Reasoning
• Today, I left for work at 8 o’clock and arrived at work on time.
• Therefore, every day that I leave for work at 8 o’clock I will arrive at work on time.– Illogical to assume an entire premise just because
one set of data suggests it
Inductive Reasoning
• Uses in scientific theory– 100% of biological life forms that we know of
depend on liquid water to exist. – Therefore, if we discover a new biological life form
it will probably depend on liquid water to exist.
Reasoning
Deductive Reasoning• “Top-down”• Reasoning from one or
more premises (true) to a conclusion (true)
• A=B• B=C• Therefore, A=C• If premises are true,
conclusion is ALWAYS true
Inductive Reasoning• “Bottom-up”• Reasoning from individual
facts or cases to reach a general conclusion
• All books by Jones are great• Jones’ new book must be
great• Confirmation bias• Inherently uncertain
Study cards
• Using notecards supplied, create cards for both inductive and deductive reasoning
• Definition and at least two examples• Find a partner and exchange cards, offering
advice and comments on clarity and accuracy• 10 minutes for activity
Decision Making and Moral Judgment
• Brainstorm—what are some big decisions you have to make in life?
• What makes those decisions difficult?• Weighing the pluses and the minuses– Can’t always weight pluses and minuses;
sometimes we have to proceed with limited information
Decision Making & Judgment
• Balance sheet—weighing the pro’s, the con’s, and need for additional information
• Textbook page 192• Work in groups; in each group develop a list of difficult
decisions facing teens• Choose one challenge, each member of the group creates
a balance sheet to assess the pros and cons of each choice (independent)
• Reconvene as a group and evaluate your information and come to a GROUP consensus
• 30 minutes for activity
Closure
• Ticket out the door– How do deductive and inductive reasoning differ?