thesis outline_clhs_floating restaurant.docx
TRANSCRIPT
0
CUSTOMERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF FLOATING RESTAURANT: THE CASE OF ISDAAN FLOATING RESTAURANT OF CALAUAN, LAGUNA
An Undergraduate Thesis ProposalPresented to the Faculty of the
College of International Tourism and Hospitality ManagementLyceum of the Philippines University Cavite
In Partial Fulfillmentof the Requirements of the Degree
Bachelor of Science in Cruise Line Operations in Hotel Services
ALIMAGNO, JERICO IAN O.ARNESTO, ALDRIN G.
SALIBA, MARK GABRIEL R.
July 2014
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
Background of the Study
Eating away from home goes beyond just satisfying hunger and has become a
popular form of entertainment. People go out to eat, and they expect to derive pleasure
and satisfaction from it, especially whenever the food is presented in a charming place
(Warde & Martens as cited by Abdelhamied, 2011). Value, quality, variety and dining
environment are the criteria upon which the consumer bases his/her everyday dining
decisions. Abdelhamied (2011) differentiated between dining out and eating out and
stated that customers who dine out are looking for a whole meal experience, which
includes good food and beverage products, good service and good atmosphere, while
those who eat out are just seeking to satisfy their hunger regardless the environment of
the restaurants.
One of the types of restaurants that are said to provide a different experience to
customers who dine out is a floating restaurant. Floating restaurant is a vessel, which is
usually a type of steel barge, used as a restaurant on water. Sometimes retired ships
(commercial or warships) are given a second lease of life as floating restaurants. An
example of such a warship is HMS Belfast, which was converted to serve as a floating
restaurant on the River Thames in London.
Floating restaurants are a new phenomenon for dining out in the Philippines,
where customers can be provided not only with a meal but also an entertaining casual
dining experience with unrivalled views of the bodies of water. Floating restaurant is one
of the fastest growing sectors for dining out in the Philippines.
2
The focus of this study will be the Isdaan Floating Restaurant of Calauan, Laguna.
From the name of the restaurant itself, Isdaan Calauan Laguna's specialties are sea foods
and mainly Filipino foods. This floating resto-fun park is not only a typical type of
restaurant but also a huge park where families and friends can bond and spend some
quality time.
Statement of the Problem
The primary aim of this study is to assess the customers’ perceptions of the Isdaan
Floating Restaurant of Calauan, Laguna with regards to service-related attributes, food-
related attributes, and atmosphere-related attributes.
Specifically, this will seek answers to the following research problems:
1. What is the profile of selected customers of the Isdaan Floating Restaurant of
Calauan, Laguna in terms of:
1.1 Age,
1.2 Gender,
1.3 Occupation, and
1.4 Monthly family income?
2. What is the perception of selected customers on restaurant attributes of the
Isdaan Floating Restaurant of Calauan, Laguna as to:
2.1 Service-related attributes,
2.2 Food-related attributes, and
2.3 Atmosphere-related attributes?
3. What is the level of customers' satisfaction with Isdaan Floating Restaurant?
3
4. What is the repeat patronage intention of the customers of Isdaan Floating
Restaurant?
Objectives of the Study
In general, this study will examine the customers’ perceptions of Isdaan Floating
Restaurant of Calauan, Laguna.
Specifically, this aims to:
1. Describe the profile of the customers of Isdaan Floating Restaurant of
Calauan, Laguna in terms of age, gender, occupation and monthly family
income;
2. Determine the perception of selected customers on restaurant attributes of the
Isdaan Floating Restaurant of Calauan, Laguna as to: service-related
attributes, food-related attributes, and atmosphere-related attributes;
3. Assess the level of customers' satisfaction with Isdaan Floating Restaurant;
and
4. Determine the repeat patronage intention of the customers of Isdaan Floating
Restaurant.
Significance of the Study
This study is significant in several respects:
CLHS students. This study would provide CLHS students with more insights on
customers’ satisfaction with restaurant attributes specifically in the operation of a floating
restaurant. Since floating restaurant is an under research area in the field of hospitality,
4
this study would provide CLHS students with more knowledge on what customers expect
from a floating restaurant.
Floating restaurant owners and managers. In terms of practice, this study will
provide information to owners and managers of floating restaurants in the Philippines
about the restaurant attributes that affect customers’ satisfaction with the restaurant. This
information might help them decide the types of foods, services, facilities and
improvements that could be made based on the perspectives of their customers.
Future researchers. The results of this study have further implications for future
research. Researchers may use this study as a basis in developing future studies on
floating restaurants.
Conceptual Framework
The framework for this study is based on a Input-Process-Output model that
originated in systems thinking. Figure 1 shows the conceptual paradigm of the study.
The input variables include: the perception of the customers on restaurant
attributes of Isdaan Floating Restaurant as to service-related attributes, food-related
attributes, and atmosphere-related attributes; the level of satisfaction of the customers
with Isdaan Floating Restaurant; and the repeat patronage intention of the customers of
Isdaan Floating Restaurant.
The process includes: identification and sampling of the study participants,
conduct of surveys, statistical analysis of data and interpretation and discussion of results.
INPUTS
Profile of Customers of Isdaan Floating RestaurantAge
GenderOccupation
Monthly family income
Perception of the Customers on Restaurant Attributes of Isdaan Floating RestaurantService-related attributesFood-related attributes
Atmosphere-related attributes
Level of Satisfaction of the Customers with Isdaan Floating Restaurant
Repeat Patronage Intention of the Customers of Isdaan Floating Restaurant
PROCESS
Identification and sampling of the study participants
Conduct of surveys
Statistical analysis of data
Interpretation and discussion of results
OUTPUT
The Relationship between Level of Customers’ Satisfaction with Isdaan Floating Restaurant and Customers’ Repeat Patronage Intention
5
The final component of the IPO model is the output or the ultimate goal of this
study - the relationship between level of customers’ satisfaction with Isdaan Floating
Restaurant and customers’ repeat patronage intention.
Figure 1. The Conceptual Paradigm
6
Scope and Limitations of the Study
The sampling frame consisted of customers of the Isdaan Floating Restaurant of
Calauan, Laguna only. A sample of 100 customers of Isdaan Floating Restaurant will
serve as the study participants. The participants should be at least 18 years of age since
they have some level of maturity to answer the questions provided in the questionnaire.
The scope of the study will include the perception of selected customers on
restaurant attributes of the Isdaan Floating Restaurant, the level of customers’ satisfaction
with Isdaan Floating Restaurant, the repeat patronage intention of the customers of Isdaan
Floating Restaurant. A survey instrument will be used to gather information with the
target participants.
Definition of Terms
The following terms are defined operationally as they are used in this study:
Customer satisfaction is the participant’s fulfillment response or judgment from
the product or service attributes of Isdaan Floating Restaurant. It is an overall post-
purchase evaluation of the participant whether the restaurant has performed relatively
well or poorly based on the restaurant attributes.
Floating restaurant refers to a vessel, usually a large steel barge, used as a
restaurant on water.
Repeat patronage intention is a post-dining behavioral intention or repeat visit
intention which is linked with satisfaction behavior in a restaurant setting.
7
Restaurant attributes refer to the different factors or features of the restaurant
that influence consumer satisfaction classified into service-related attributes, food-related
attributes, and atmosphere-related attributes.
8
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
This section of the study presents the review of related literature and studies
which the researchers examined and found significant to the present study. They are
reviewed to give a clear background for the problem under the study and also to provide
supporting to the objectives of this research work.
Floating Restaurant
A floating restaurant is a vessel, which is usually a type of steel barge, used as a
restaurant on water. Sometimes retired ships (commercial or warships) are given a second
lease of life as floating restaurants. An example of such a warship is HMS Belfast, which
was converted to serve as a floating restaurant on the River Thames in London. Floating
restaurants are divided into two different types: fixed floating restaurants, where the
restaurants serve their customers in its fixed location and customers can come through
any time they want without advanced reservation. The other type is the Sailing Floating
Restaurants (SFRs). Sailing Floating Restaurants are slightly different from the fixed
version, for while SFRs serve three fixed meals (lunch, early dinner and late dinner) they
have specific sailing times and therefore, customers must be on board before the sailing
time (Abdelhamied, 2011).
The first floating restaurants appeared in the typhoon shelter shortly after World
War II. The longest established have been Sea Palace Floating Restaurant which was sold
and towed to either the Philippines or Australia some years ago (there are conflicting
sources on this issue) and the current two floating restaurants moored next to each other
9
in the harbor, Jumbo Floating Restaurant and Tai Pak Floating Restaurant which are now
under the same management and collectively known as Jumbo Kingdom. The current
restaurants do not actually "float" and are supported on concrete. Some sections of the
restaurants such as the kitchens are modular and are occasionally towed away for
maintenance in local shipyards (Hong Kong Extras website, n.d.).
The triple-deck Jumbo, elaborately decorated in the theme of a Chinese Imperial
Palace with pagodas and gold dragons is the largest floating restaurant in the world,
seating over 2000 diners, and rather dwarfs its smaller neighbour to which it is linked by
walkways. The original Jumbo was burnt down before its opening in 1971 with a loss of
over 30 lives. It was rebuilt and finally opened in 1976 since when it has become world-
famous and attracted over 30 million visitors including many celebrities. Famous diners
include John Wayne, Tom Cruise, Chow Yun Fat, Gong Li and Queen Elizabeth II. It has
been featured in many movies including James Bond “The Man With The Golden Gun”
and Jackie Chan’s “The Protector”. Tai Pak, which can seat about 400 diners, dates back
to 1952 and has also has celebrity status having featured in several movies including
“Love is a Many Splendored Thing” in 1955 and “The World of Suzie Wong” in 1960.
Scenes for Steven Soderbergh's thriller "Contagion" due for release in 2011 and starring
Gwyneth Paltrow, Matt Damon, Jude Law and Kate Winslet were filmed on Tai Pak
during October 2010. Tai Pak has been visited by Hollywood stars including Yul
Brynner, Elizabeth Taylor and John Wayne. At night Jumbo Kingdom is spectacularly
illuminated (Hong Kong Extras website, n.d.).
10
Perception of Customers on Restaurant Attributes
Literature and studies that focused on floating restaurant are very limited
particularly on the perception of customers on restaurant attributes. The succeeding
discussion will focus on perceptions of customers on different restaurant attributes
grouped according to service-related attributes, food-related attributes and atmosphere-
related attributes.
Service related attributes
Service quality is one of the most critical factors influencing customer satisfaction
and future behaviors; service quality has been extensively researched within the service
marketing field. Service quality is often viewed from two perspectives: the customer’s
cognitive evaluation of the service provided and a multidimensional construct created by
an evaluation of attribute performance (Parasuraman, Zeithaml & Berry cited in
Abdelhamied, 2011).
In a service context, service quality can be defined as having two dimensions:
functional service quality and technical service quality. Functional service quality is
associated with the interactions between the customer and service provider and between
the customer and the processes through which the service is delivered. Technical service
quality refers to the quality of the service output (Clark & Wood mentioned in
Abdelhamied, 2011). In restaurant settings, functional service quality relates to the
employee’s performance, whereas technical service quality is associated with food
quality. Previous studies have identified that these two dimensions of quality perception
(service quality and food quality) have a positive relationship with customer satisfaction
(Caruana, Money & Berthon, 2000; Namkung & Jang, 2007).
11
Hundreds of research had shown a number of attributes that consumers consider
being important when selecting restaurants. Liang and Zhang (2009) studied the
relationship between service quality, price fairness and customer satisfaction in student
food service. Results have shown that the factors of highest impact are, in order, food
variety, price fairness and convenience. However, service quality is the most important
factor of overall customer satisfaction. However, interaction and environment are not
found to be significant.
Food-related attributes
In a number of empirical studies, food quality has emerged as the most important
determinant of customer satisfaction (Namkung & Jang, 2007; Peri, 2006; Sulek &
Hensley, 2004). Namkung and Jang (2007) reported in Lim (2010) investigated into the
relative factors that constitute food quality as follows: presentation; health options; taste;
freshness; variety; and temperature.
According to Ng (2005) among all the possible determinants of customer
satisfaction in restaurants, studies have found that food quality is rated as the most
powerful predictor of customer intent to return. In studies of both fast food restaurants
and Chinese restaurants, food quality was ranked as one of the most important
determinants of a customer’s decision to return to a given restaurant.
Sulek and Hensley (2004) conducted a case study related to a full-service
restaurant. They discovered that of all the components in a full-service restaurant, food
quality is the most important. Although a customer evaluates multiple attributes when
12
determining food quality, he or she is really judging three general food characteristics -
namely safety, appeal, and dietary acceptability.\
Mattila (2001) considered food quality a key predictor of customer loyalty in
casual-dining restaurants. Namkung and Jang (2007) evaluated the relationships of
individual attributes that constitute food quality (e.g. food presentation, menu variety,
healthy options, taste, food freshness and temperature) with customer satisfaction and
behavioral intentions. The findings indicated that food presentation, taste and temperature
were significantly related to customer satisfaction, whereas food presentation, taste and
healthy options were significant predictors of behavioral intention.
Atmosphere-related attributes
In service settings such as restaurants and hotels, the atmosphere in which the
service takes place may be crucial in determining the customer’s perception and
satisfaction with the service encounter.
Sulek and Hensley (2004) proved that atmosphere of the dining area was a
significant predictor of satisfaction in the overall dining experience. University dining
facilities have begun to emphasize décor, music, and lighting as a selling point to
customers. This helps to create an expectation of the dining experience. Hence, it is
rational to believe that the customer’s perceptions of service quality and a restaurant’s
atmosphere may be influential in determining their return intentions.
Dube et al. as cited by Ng (2005) revealed that all of the elements such as
atmosphere, helpful server, attentive server, menu variety, waiting time, consistent food,
and tasty food, had a significant influence on diners’ intent to return to the restaurant.
13
Yoo (2012) conducted a cross cultural study on customer perceptions of
restaurant cleanliness The appearance of the restaurant interior was the fifth most
important factor for the Asian sample and the sixth most important factor for the Western
sample. This includes cleanliness of table cloths, windows and windowsills, floor and
carpet and food contact surface and open kitchen. Although this factor was found to be
not statistically significant overall, table cloths were found to be one item that was
statistically significant. In this factor, except for the food contact surface, the Asian
sample had higher means in the other four restaurant interior items (Yoo, 2012).
Customers' Satisfaction with Restaurant Attributes
Growing competition in the restaurant industry and the increasing importance of
consumer patronage impose the need to provide better services and to satisfy consumers.
The topic of ‘customer satisfaction’ has held a significant position in the marketing
literature for decades since satisfied customers can directly affect customer loyalty,
organizational profits, return patronage and word-of-mouth communications.
Collier and Bienstock (2006) stated that customer satisfaction results when
customers experience a specific service and compare it to what was expected. Kotler and
Kotler and Keller (2006) defined customer satisfaction as the post-purchase
evaluation of products or services given expectations before the purchase. These
conceptualizations imply that customer satisfaction is an overall judgment process of the
perceived discrepancy between prior expectation and actual consumption experiences.
Abdelhamied (2011) explored customers’ perceptions of the floating restaurants
sailing down Cairo’s Nile River in Egypt. He explored the relationships among food
14
quality attributes, service quality elements, atmosphere (and other aspects) and
customers’ satisfaction of floating restaurants; and also to investigate the relationship
among customers’ satisfaction, service quality and repeat patronage intention. The results
indicate that aspects such as parking spaces, healthy, and local dishes, along with
restroom cleanliness are pivotal attributes to create satisfied customers.
Ryu and Han (2010), who examined that quality of food, which includes taste,
nutritional value, and visual appeal is a significant predictor of customer satisfaction in
the quick-casual dining sector.
The findings also support and share similar results to the study by Namkung and
Jang (2007) which conclude that food quality and satisfaction play an important role in
determining customer behavioral intentions toward restaurants. Their study reconfirms
that high quality food is a key component of running a successful family restaurant.
Haghighi et al. (2006) investigated the factors affecting customer loyalty in the
restaurant industry. The obtained results show that food quality, service quality,
restaurant environment, and perception of price fairness had a positive impact on
customer satisfaction, but the impact of restaurant location on customer satisfaction was
not confirmed. Also, the results show that food quality is the most important factor
affecting customer satisfaction and trust in Boof Chain Restaurants. It was revealed that
restaurant management should take into particular consideration the taste, appearance,
and presentation of food, food healthiness, and also try to increase food diversity in order
to cover various tastes of different customers.
Ng (2005) emphasized that appropriate portion size of food, taste, eye appeal of
the food, freshness of the food, nutritional content of the food and variety of menu
15
options are important in customer satisfaction and return intention in university dining
facilities. Yuksel and Yuksel (2002) found out that the availability of local dishes is
preferred by customers as part of their dining experiences.
In restaurant settings, service quality has been found to be important in
determining customer satisfaction and return intention as well.
Yuksel and Yuksel’s (2002) study about tourist satisfaction with restaurant
service stated that “service environment holds a central role in shaping the nature of
customers’ behavior, their reactions to places and their social interactions. Customers are
likely to spend their time and money in an establishment where the service environment
prompts a feeling of pleasure.”
In the research of Abdullah and Rozario (2010) the variable quality of
place/ambience of restaurant is measured through customers’ perceived satisfaction with
comfort of the place, noise level, appearance, temperature, cleanliness and layout of
furniture in the cafeteria. Hensley and Sulek (2007) also agree that customer perceptions
may be influenced with proper lighting, temperature and comfortable furnishings.
Benhura et al. (2012) found out that the attendants of private food outlets at the
University of Zimbabwe to customers did not greet customers or smile to them. This may
look minor, but the implication is that the organization loses business to competitors.
Poor service quality increases customer dissatisfaction and the likelihood that customers
dine at a competitor and become an active companion in persuading others to go
elsewhere (Ryu et al., 2012).
In another study of Min and Min (2011), it was noted that waiting time, staff
attitude, food quality and variety significantly affect customer satisfaction. The canteen
16
may lose customers because there is no effective method for customers to share their
views on the service provided and the quality expected. The canteen staff needed to
appreciate that quality is measured against customers’ expectations.
Repeat Patronage Intention of Customers in a Restaurant
Customers frequently develop an attitude about a provider based on their product
or service experiences. Oliver (1997) described this attitude as a fairly stable like or
dislike of the product or service. She indicated that this attitude is strongly related to the
customers’ intentions to repatronize the service or product and to use positive word-of-
mouth endorsements. In this sense, Oliver (1997) defined behavioral intentions (i.e.,
repurchase and word-of-mouth intentions) as ‘a stated likelihood to engage in a
behavior’. It is true that repurchase intention is a critical part of such attitudinal or
behavioral constructs, it should not merely be characterized by a positive attitude toward
a provider, because customers often engage in repeat purchasing behaviors when there is
no psychological bond. Although the definitions of customer satisfaction vary in the
literature, researchers generally agree that an essential element underlying customer
satisfaction is an evaluation process (Back & Parks, 2003; Ladhari, Brun & Morales,
2008).
The overwhelming number of studies of customer satisfaction outcomes in the
food service industry indicates a positive relationship between customer satisfaction and
repurchase intention (Abdelhamied, 2011).
A recent study of Abdelhamied (2011) which investigates customer perceptions of
floating restaurants in Egypt and the key restaurant attributes affecting customer
17
satisfaction and repeat patronage intention provided evidence for the direct effect of
service quality and satisfaction on repatronage intention. Customer satisfaction emerged
as a stronger predictor of repatronage intentions in the restaurant setting.
Lim (2010) argues that while the quality of food and service is paramount, a
pleasing atmosphere may contribute to even a greater level of overall satisfaction of the
customer and his/her subsequent patronage. He stresses that environmental elements in
the restaurant have a huge impact on the emotional responses and behavior of customers.
These environmental elements include lighting, music, temperature, scent, smell and
furnishing.
Soderlund and Ohman (2005) assessed the role of intentions as a link between
satisfaction and repatronizing behavior in a restaurant setting, and found that customer
satisfaction is significantly related to two specific intention constructs: intentions as
expectations and intentions as wants.
In the study of customer expectation factors, Soriano (2002) found that after
quality of food, quality of service was ranked the second most important factor in
determining the customer’s decision to return to the restaurant. Then, the study of the
measurement of tourist satisfaction with restaurant service, a segment-based approach
indicated that there were different segments seeking different benefits (Yuksel & Yuksel,
2002). Yuksel and Yuksel (2002) found that service quality had the most significant
effect on dining satisfaction at the aggregate market level.
Kivela, Inbakaran, and Reece (2000) found that convenience is also a significant
issue in determining return intentions. Soriano (2002) mentioned that the importance of a
18
comfortable atmosphere will continue to increase with time. Therefore, the most
important thing is design and concept.
Synthesis
This chapter reviews studies and literatures of specific attributes of restaurants
that contribute to customer satisfaction and repeat patronage intentions. These
characteristics are grouped according to service-related attributes, food-related attributes
and atmosphere-related attributes.
This study makes important contributions towards understanding the customers
perception, satisfaction and repeat patronage intention in a floating restaurant. Some
findings revealed that the most influential factor for consumers in restaurants was food
quality while other studies showed that dimensions of service quality and atmosphere of
the restaurant are very important for consumers.
This study will review previous studies and literatures with regards to attributes of
restaurants and food service operations that satisfy customers and influence their repeat
patronage intentions. It is the goal of the researchers to use the findings of these scholars
to lend support to the results of the current study.
19
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
This chapter presents the research design, population, participants of the study,
instrumentation, validation of instrument, data gathering procedure and the methods of
analysis.
Research Design
A descriptive- correlational research design utilizing quantitative method to
describe the perception, satisfaction and repeat patronage intention of customers of
Isdaan Floating Restaurant shall be used in this study. According to Shuttleworth (2008),
the purpose of descriptive-correlational research is to determine the relations among two
or more variables. Data are gathered from multiple variables and correlational statistical
techniques are then applied to the data. After the important variables have been
identified, the relations among those variables are investigated.
Sources of Data
The sampling frame consists of customers of the Isdaan Floating Restaurant of
Calauan, Laguna only. A total of 100 customers of Isdaan Floating Restaurant will serve
as the study participants. The participants should be at least 18 years of age since they
have the level of maturity to answer the questions provided in the questionnaire.
Convenience sampling technique will be employed in the selection of participants for this
study.
20
Participants of the Study
The participants of this study will be a convenience sample of 100 customers of
the Isdaan Floating Restaurant. The criteria for the selection of participants include: 1) a
person who dines at Isdaan Floating Restaurant during the time of survey, and 2) 18 years
old or older.
Data Gathering Procedure
Permission to conduct surveys will be obtained from the Research Adviser, Thesis
Coordinator and the Associate Dean of CITHM. After obtaining permission, surveys with
the respondents will be administered on August 2014.
Prior to the study initiation, approval will be gained from the management of
Isdaan Floating Restaurant after visiting the manager and explaining the purpose of the
study. Once approval is granted, the target customers will be approached to participate in
this research. A questionnaire will be used to gather data and examine customers’
perceptions of the Isdaan Floating Restaurant.
The target customers will be surveyed after dining at the Isdaan Floating
Restaurant. The researchers will wait for the participants to complete the survey
instrument since there is a slim chance of retrieving the questionnaire after he/she has left
the place.
Research Instrumentation
The survey questionnaire prepared by the researchers will be used as main
gathering tool which consists of three parts: Part I – Background Information, Part II –
21
Perception on Restaurant Attributes, Part III – Customers Satisfaction with Isdaan
Floating Restaurant, and Part IV – Repeat Patronage Intention.
Validation of Instrument
This instrument will be developed and validated using three sources; the relevant
literature review, the panel of experts from CITHM, and industry managers to check the
items for content validity, design, layout, wording, and measurement scales.
The researchers will ask the help of three faculty members of CITHM to validate
the questionnaire. The suggestions and comments of these experts will be considered in
the improvement of the questionnaire.
Data Analysis
The survey questionnaire is a quantitative type method (predefined questions and
formatted in standardized questionnaires) that provides access to quantitative
information. A 5-point Likert response will be used to measure objectively the
perceptions, satisfaction and repeat patronage intention of the participants with Isdaan
Floating Restaurant.
To interpret the perception of the participants with restaurant attributes of Isdaan
Floating Restaurant, the following scale parameters will be used:
5 – Excellent
4 – Above average
3 – Average
2 – Below Average
22
1 – Poor
To interpret the satisfaction of the participants with attributes of Isdaan Floating
Restaurant, the following scale parameters will be used:
5 – Very Satisfied
4 – Satisfied
3 – Somewhat Satisfied / Dissatisfied
2 – Dissatisfied
1 – Very Dissatisfied
To determine the repeat patronage intention of the participants, the following
scale parameters will be used:
5 – Strongly Agree
4 – Agree
3 – Somewhat Agree/Disagree
2 – Disagree
1 – Strongly Disagree
Statistical Treatment of Data
Descriptive statistical tools will be used in answering the objectives of the study.
Frequency counts, percentages and weighted mean scores will be computed to present the
present the perception, satisfaction and repeat patronage intention of the participants in
reference to the specific restaurant attributes of Isdaan Floating Restaurant.
23
REFERENCES
Abdelhamied, H.H.S. (2011). Customers’ perceptions of floating restaurants in Egypt. Anatolia – An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 22(1), 1-15.
Abdullah, D. N. M. A. and Rozario, F. (2010). Influence of Service and Product Quality towards Customer Satisfaction: A Case Study at the Staff Cafeteria in the Hotel Industry. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences 5(7), 454-459.
Back, K., & Parks, S. (2003). A brand loyalty model involving cognitive, affective, and cognitive brand loyalty and customer satisfaction. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 27(4),419–435.
Benhura, C., Nyagura, S.F., Dakwa, V., Gombiro, P.E. Ngwenyama, P., Matanhire, R., Garamukanwa, A., Mudita, N., Zhangazha J. and W. Mashavira. (2012). Food Service Quality Survey at the University of Zimbabwe Private Canteens. Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology 4(5): 281-285.
C. (2006). The universe of food quality. Food Quality and Preference, 17 (1-2), 3-8.
Caruana, A., Money, A., & Berthon, P. (2000). Service quality and satisfaction—the moderating role of value. European Journal of Marketing, 34, 1338–1352.
Collier, J., & Bienstock, C. (2006). Measuring service quality in e-retailing. Journal of Service Research, 8, 260–275.
Haghighi, M. Dorosti, A., Rahnama, A. and A. Hoseinpour. (2012). Evaluation of factors affecting customer loyalty in the restaurant industry. African Journal of Business Management, 6(14), 5039-5046.
Hong Kong Extras website. (n.d.). Floating restaurants. Retrieved from http://www.hongkongextras.com/_aberdeen.html
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. (2006). Marketing management (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Ladhari, R., Brun, I., & Morales, M. (2008). Determinants of dining satisfaction and post dining behavioral intention. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27(4), 563–573.
Lim, H. (2010). Understanding American customer perceptions on Japanese food and services in the U.S. UNLV Theses/Dissertations/Professional Papers/Capstones.
Mattila, A. (2001). Emotional bonding and restaurant loyalty. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 42(6), 73–79.
24
Min, H.; Min, H. (2011) Benchmarking the service quality of fast-food restaurant franchises in the USA: A longitudinal study. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 18(2), 282-300.
Namkung, Y., & Jang, S.C. (2007). Does food quality really matter in restaurants? Its impact on customer satisfaction and behavioral intentions. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 31(3), 387.
Ng, Y. N. (2005).A study of customer satisfaction, return intention, and word-of-mouth endorsement in university dining facilities. Master’s Thesis, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma.
Ryu, K., and Han, H., (2010). Influence of the Quality of Food, Service, and Physical Environment on Customer Satisfaction and Behavioural Intention in Quick-Casual Restaurants: Moderating Role of Perceived Price. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research 34, 310.
service: An example of student cafeteria in NHH. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences 1 (1), 113-124.
Soderlund, M., & Ohman, N. (2005). Assessing behavior before it becomes behavior: An examination of the role of intentions as a link between satisfaction and repatronizing behavior. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16, 169–185.
Soriano, D. R. (2002) Customers’ expectations factors in restaurants: The situation in Spain. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19 (8/9), 1055-1067.
Sulek, J. M., & Hensley, R. L. (2004).The relative importance of food, atmosphere, and fairness of wait.Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 45 (3), 235-247.
Yoo, S. A. (2012). Customer Perceptions of Restaurant Cleanliness: A Cross Cultural Study. Master’s Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
Yuksel, A., & Yuksel, F. (2002). Measurement of tourist satisfaction with restaurant services: a segment-based approach. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 9 (1), 52-68.
25
Appendix A
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
26
LYCEUM OF THE PHILIPPINES UNIVERSITY- CAVITE College of International Tourism and Hospitality Management
Governor’s Drive, General Trias, Cavite
Dear Respondent,
We are fourth year college students of the Lyceum of the Philippines University - Cavite taking up Bachelor of Science in Cruise Line Operations in Hotel Services. We are currently conducting our thesis entitled Customers’ Perceptions of Floating Restaurant: The Case of Isdaan Floating Restaurant of Calauan, Laguna.
In view of this, we are inviting you to participate in this study. We would be grateful if you could spare some of your valuable time to fill in the questionnaire. The survey would take approximately 10-15 minutes.
All information obtained from this study will be kept confidential.
Thank you very much for your cooperation and participation!
Sincerely,
The Researchers
27
I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1. Name (optional): _______________________________
2. Age:[ ] 20-30 [ ] 41-50
[ ] 31-40 [ ] 50 or older
3. Gender:
[ ] Male [ ] Female
4. Occupation:
[ ] Student [ ] Employed in the government
[ ] Retired [ ] Privately employed
[ ] Self-employed/Business person
Others, specify _________________________
5. Monthly family income (in peso)
[ ] Php 10,000 or less [ ] Php 25,001-30,000
[ ] Php 10,001-15,000 [ ] Php30,001-35,000
[ ] Php 15,001-20,000 [ ] Php35,001-40,000
[ ] Php 20,001-25,000 [ ] Php40,001 or higher
II. Perceptions of Customers on Restaurant Attributes
Please rate the different attributes of Isdaan Floating Restaurant using the rating scale below:
Rating scale:
5 – Excellent
4 – Above average
3 – Average
2 – Below Average
1 – Poor
28
Service-related Attributes 5 4 3 2 1
29
1. Attentive staff2. Efficient service3. Sympathetic handling of complaints4. Staff appearance5. Restaurant has personnel who seem well-trained, competent and
experienced6. Dependable and consistent service7. Restaurant has staff who are knowledgeable of the menu items8. Parking convenience
Food-related attributes9. Variety of menu items10. Food freshness11. Taste of food and portion12. Variety of food items13. Availability of healthy dishes14. Availability of local dishes15. Food temperature16. Food presentation
Price and Value17. Good value for the price18. Appropriate portion size19. Reasonable price items
Atmosphere-related attributes20. Visually attractive dining area21. Comfortable seating space and easy to move around in22. Dining privacy23. Cleanliness of the restaurant and public areas on board24. Cleanliness of the restrooms25. Appropriate restaurant temperature26. Music and entertainment27. Lighting and ventilation
III. Satisfaction with Attributes of Isdaan Floating Restaurant
30
Please indicate your satisfaction with the different attributes of Isdaan Floating Restaurant using the rating scale below:
5 – Very Satisfied
4 – Satisfied
3 – Somewhat Satisfied / Dissatisfied
2 – Dissatisfied
1 – Very Dissatisfied
Satisfaction Items 5 4 3 2 11. How satisfied are you with the service-related attributes of Isdaan
Floating Restaurant?2. How satisfied are you with the food-related attributes of Isdaan
Floating Restaurant?3. How satisfied are you with the atmosphere-related attributes of
Isdaan Floating Restaurant?4. What is the your satisfaction from the overall service you received
from Isdaan Floating Restaurant?
IV. Repeat Patronage Intention of the Customers of Isdaan Floating Restaurant
Please indicate the extent of your agreement or disagreement on the following statements using the rating scale below:
5 – Very Satisfied
4 – Satisfied
3 – Somewhat Satisfied / Dissatisfied
2 – Dissatisfied
1 – Very Dissatisfied
5 4 3 2 1
31
1. I will come again to this restaurant.2. This floating restaurant will be my first choice when I decide to
dine out.3. I will certainly recommend this floating restaurant to friends and
relatives.4. I would pay a higher price than the other restaurants’ charge for
the dining experience I received from this floating restaurant.5. I will certainly visit this floating restaurant in the near future.
APPENDIX B
32
PROJECTED TIMETABLE
ACTIVITY MONTHJun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
Title brainstormingPreparation of thesis concept papersApproval of thesis titlePreparation of thesis proposalThesis proposal defenseRevisions of thesis proposalInstrument validation of expertsSurvey with participantsStatistical analysis of dataPreparation of thesis manuscriptFinal oral defenseRevisions of final manuscriptBinding and distribution of approved manuscriptTarget start date: June 2014Target date of completion: November 2014