thermoresponsive hybrid hydrogel of oxidized nanocellulose using a polypeptide crosslinker
TRANSCRIPT
ORIGINAL PAPER
Thermoresponsive hybrid hydrogel of oxidizednanocellulose using a polypeptide crosslinker
Jie Cheng • Minsung Park • Jinho Hyun
Received: 27 December 2013 / Accepted: 18 February 2014
� Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014
Abstract Thermoresponsive hybrid nanocellulose
hydrogels were prepared from a mixture of oxidized
nanocellulose and elastin-like polypeptide (ELP).
Positively charged ELP was used as a polymeric
crosslinker for conjugation with negatively charged
nanocellulose. Hydrogel formation was triggered by a
simple increase in temperature, and the hydrogel was
reversibly returned to the liquid phase by decreasing
temperature. Surface potential measurement con-
firmed the electrostatic properties of oxidized nano-
cellulose and ELP molecules. The surface morphology
of hydrogels was observed by atomic force micros-
copy and field emission-scanning electron micros-
copy. Conformational changes in the ELP/
nanocellulose hybrid were characterized by circular
dichroism. The ELP/nanocellulose hybrid hydrogel
was noncytotoxic and suitable for encapsulating cells,
indicating its potential for biomedical applications.
Keywords Bacterial cellulose � Polypeptide �Thermo-responsiveness � Hydrogel
Introduction
As the most abundant renewable resource on earth,
cellulose has potential in a wide range of applications
(Klemm et al. 2011; Eichhorn et al. 2005). Natural
cellulose and its derivatives have been widely studied
for the fabrication of hydrogels (Chang and Zhang
2011). Due to the strong interfibrillar forces, micro-
fibrillar cellulose obtained by mechanical disintegra-
tion of wood fibers forms a strong gel in water
suspension (Paakko et al. 2007). Nanocellulose-based
hydrogel can be fabricated from disintegrated cellu-
lose suspensions (Zhao et al. 2007; Ostlund et al. 2009;
Dong et al. 2013), cellulose derivatives (Marci et al.
2006; Fei et al. 2000), and cellulose-polymer blending
(Zhao et al. 2009; Chang et al. 2008).
Recently, stimuli responsive cellulose-based
hydrogels have been fabricated through chemical
modifications or incorporating of polymers (Amin
et al. 2012; Halake and Lee 2014). Chemical modi-
fications of cellulose can be exclusively performed on
the hydroxyl groups through esterification, etherifica-
tion and oxidation reactions. Interestingly, carboxy-
methyl cellulose can be pH-responsive (Tan et al.
2010; Ekici 2011), with pKa around 3–4. Hydroxy-
propylmethyl cellulose is a temperature-responsive
cellulose derivative exhibiting a sol–gel transition in
aqueous solution at 41 �C (Zhang et al. 2011; Bai et al.
2012; Li et al. 2001; Silva et al. 2008). However, the
gelation temperature is too high to encapsulate cells.
UV light or electron-beam irradiation was reported for
Electronic supplementary material The online version ofthis article (doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0208-4) contains supple-mentary material, which is available to authorized users.
J. Cheng � M. Park � J. Hyun (&)
Department of Biosystems and Biomaterials Science and
Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-921,
Korea
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Cellulose
DOI 10.1007/s10570-014-0208-4
the fabrication of responsive cellulose hydrogels, but
in situ encapsulation would be harmful to cells (Amin
et al. 2012; Halake and Lee 2014).
Bacterial cellulose (BC) synthesized by Acetobacter
xylimum possesses a series of novel properties, includ-
ing high porosity, high crystallinity, water absorbance,
excellent mechanical properties and biocompatibility.
These characteristics make BC a very desirable mate-
rial for bio-related applications. BC is a hydrogel
consisting of type I cellulose nanofibers with a layer-by-
layer structure. Recently, Isogai and coworkers devel-
oped a 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO)-
oxidation method to disintegrate cellulose into
TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers without losing
any of the original crystallinity of natural cellulose
(Fukuzumi et al. 2009; Isogai et al. 2011; Saito et al.
2007). Due to electrostatic repulsion and osmotic
effects, the TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers were
completely and individually dispersed in water (Isogai
et al. 2011).
As a polymeric crosslinker of nanocellulose-based
hydrogels, positively charged elastin-like polypeptide
(ELP) was adopted. ELP, an artificial smart polypep-
tide, has successfully been prepared by a number of
different strategies. ELPs are biopolymers of the
pentapeptide repeat Val-Pro-Gly-Xaa-Gly derived
from human tropoelastin, where the ‘‘guest residue’’
Xaa can be any of the natural amino acids except for
Pro. Their biocompatibility, biodegradability, non-
immunogenicity, stimuli-responsive characteristics
and thermo-responsive characteristics make ELPs a
very promising candidate for drug delivery and other
biomedical applications (Nettles et al. 2010; Bidwell
and Raucher 2010; Simnick et al. 2007; Cheng et al.
2013). ELPs are soluble in aqueous solution below the
inverse transition temperature (Tt); once the temper-
ature increases above Tt, ELPs undergo a sharp phase
transition accompanied by aggregation.
Herein, a thermoresponsive polysaccharide hydro-
gel based on nanofibrous cellulose and ELP was
prepared. When TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose
(TOBC) and ELP were mixed together at temperatures
lower than the Tt of ELPs, positively charged ELPs
spontaneously adsorbed onto the surface of negatively
charged TOBC due to electrostatic interactions. ELPs
folded and coacervated when the temperature
increased above Tt, causing TOBCs to rope together
and form a porous hybrid hydrogel of ELP and TOBC.
The thermoresponsive polysaccharide hydrogel of
TOBC and ELP was unique because of its noncyto-
toxicity and reversible sol–gel transition. Compared
with hydrogels bonded covalently using smaller
crosslinkers, the polysaccharide hydrogel of TOBC
and ELP was resuspended by simply decreasing the
temperature. This is a promising material for applica-
tions in biotechnology and life science fields that
require properties such as cell encapsulation, tissue
engineering and controlled drug release.
Materials and experimental methods
Preparation of TOBC
BC was prepared by fermenting a single Glu-
conacetobacter xylinus (KCCM 40216) colony in
mannitol culture medium. BC was harvested and
purified by soaking in 1 wt% sodium hydroxide with
gentle agitation for 24 h at room temperature. Subse-
quently, BC was thoroughly washed with running
distilled water and then freeze-dried.
TOBC was prepared following the method reported
by the Isogai group (Isogai et al. 2011). BC was
oxidized by TEMPO. To obtain TEMPO-oxidized BC,
the never-dried BC pellicle (0.45 g of cellulose
content) was cut into small pieces and then suspended
in 500 ml distilled water containing 20 mg TEMPO
and 0.5 g NaBr. Then, 15 ml NaClO solution was
added to the BC suspension to start the oxidation. The
solution was maintained at pH 10, and the mixture was
vigorously agitated with a magnetic stirring bar for
2 days. At the end of the reaction, oxidation was
quenched by adding ethanol to the suspension. The
products were washed three times via centrifugation
and then freeze-dried for further use.
Synthesis of ELP
The ELP gene [(VPGVG)14(VPGKG)]8[VPGVG]40
was oligomerized by recursive directional ligation and
transformed into E. coli strain BLR (DE3) (Novagen,
USA) for expression. The ELP was purified by inverse
transition cycling and the collected ELP was freeze-
dried (Meyer and Chilkoti 2002). Detailed information
regarding ELP synthesis is described in supplementary
information.
Cellulose
123
Sol–gel transition
TOBC/ELP solution (2 wt%, TOBC:ELP = 1:1) was
prepared at 4 �C and then transferred to an incubator at
37 �C to trigger sol–gel phase transition. For compar-
ison, pure TOBC and ELP solutions with a concen-
tration of 1 wt% were also prepared at 4 �C and
transferred to an incubator at 37 �C. After these
solutions were heated to 37 �C and equilibrated for
30 min, the sol–gel transition was determined by vial
inversion, which is a visual inspection of the sol–gel
phase transition.
Characterization of TOBC/ELP
To determine the Tt of ELP and TOBC/ELP solution,
OD350 was monitored by a UV–visible spectropho-
tometer equipped with a water circulating temperature
controller (Mecasys, South Korea). The samples were
heated at a rate of 1 �C/min.
To further confirm hydrogel formation, dynamic
rheological analysis was performed to determine the
change in sample viscoelasticity as a function of
temperature. Rheological measurements of ELP
(2 wt%), TOBC (2 wt%) and TOBC/ELP (2 wt% for
a 1:1 TOBC–ELP mixture) were performed using the
Advanced Rheometric Expansion System (Rheomet-
ric Scientific, UK). Measurements were carried out by
increasing temperature in the range of 25–40 �C at an
angular frequency of 1.0 rad/s and a shear stress of
2.0 Pa.
Secondary ELP structure was determined by circu-
lar dichroism (CD) (Applied photophysics, UK) at
different temperatures. ELP (0.5 mg/ml) and TOBC/
ELP (1 mg/ml for a 1:1 TOBC-ELP mixture) solutions
were prepared for CD analysis.
Fluorescence emission/excitation spectra were
recorded by FP-8300 spectrofluorometer (Jasco,
Japan). To determine the maximum excitation spec-
trum, ELP solution with a concentration of 0.25 mg/ml
was scanned in the range of 200–500 nm, and emission
spectra were recorded in the range of 220–750 nm.
Sample emissions were recorded in the range of
280–450 nm with the excitation wavelength set to
270 nm at given temperatures.
Zeta-potentials of ELP, TOBC and TOBC/ELP
complexes were measured by dynamic light scattering
(Zetasizer Nano, Malvern, UK) to determine the
electrophoretic mobility of samples. All samples were
suspended in deionized water, and measurements were
carried out at 20 �C with folded capillary cells.
Sample surface morphologies were imaged by
atomic force microscopy (AFM, Park Science) with a
non-contact mode (tip model, spring constant 42 N/m)
in air. The pure TOBC and TOBC/ELP solutions were
casted on a mica surface and dried at room temperature
prior to AFM imaging.
The inner morphologies of the TOBC solution, the
TOBC/ELP solution and the TOBC/ELP hydrogel
were observed by imaging the cross-section of the
samples by scanning electron microscope (SEM).
SEM images were acquired with a SUPRA 55VP field-
emission SEM (Carl Zeiss, Germany). After samples
were equilibrated at given temperatures, they were
dipped into liquid nitrogen and freeze-dried. Freeze-
dried samples were coated by gold sputter prior to
SEM observation.
Cell viability and proliferation
NIH-3T3 fibroblast cells were used for MTT assay.
The cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s minimal
essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10 %
fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomy-
cin (100 lg/ml) and HEPES (7.5 mM). Briefly, 200 ll
of NIH-3T3 fibroblast cells were seeded on a 96-well
plate at a density of 4 9 104 cells/well. They were
incubated (37 �C, 5 % CO2) overnight to allow the
cells to attach to the surface of the wells. The medium
was sequentially removed and the wells were washed
with PBS. Then, 100 ll of fresh medium was added to
each well followed by the addition of 100 ll of
sterilized TOBC/ELP aqueous complex at a concen-
tration of 0.02–5 mg/ml. This resulted in final con-
centrations of 0.01, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 mg/ml. As a
control, 100 ll of sterilized DW was added to the well
and mixed with 100 ll of fresh medium. Cells were
incubated for another 48 h in 5 % CO2 at 37 �C. After
incubation, 20 ll of MTT solution (5 mg/ml in PBS)
was added to each well and incubated for another 4 h.
Next, the medium containing the MTT solution was
aspirated. The crystallized product was dissolved in
100 ll of DMSO, and absorbance was measured at
570 nm using a plate reader. Cell viability was
calculated by dividing the optical density (OD) value
of the experimental sample with the OD value of the
control sample.
Cellulose
123
Cell encapsulation with TOBC/ELP
The TOBC/ELP aqueous complex for cell encapsula-
tion was sterilized by autoclave. NIH-3T3 fibroblast
cells were seeded into the TOBC/ELP aqueous
complex at 20 �C with a final concentration of
2 9 106 cells/ml. The cell-containing TOBC/ELP
complex was then transferred to a 37 �C humidified
environmental incubator and incubated for 30 min to
trigger the sol–gel transition. After cell encapsulation,
the TOBC/ELP hydrogel was rinsed with pre-warmed
DMEM medium several times to replace the remain-
ing water inside the hydrogel. Encapsulated cells were
cultured in a 5 % CO2 humidified incubator at 37 �C
for 2, 5 or 7 days until examination.
A live/dead viability fluorescence assay was per-
formed by staining cells with a live/dead viability/
cytotoxicity kit for mammalian cells (Invitrogen,
USA). The combined live/dead assay reagents were
added to cover hydrogel containing cells and then
incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark.
Cell viability was observed by fluorescence micros-
copy (BX51, Olympus, Japan).
Fibroblast cells seeded and spread in a hydrogel
were fixed with 2 % aqueous glutardaldehyde solution
for 30 min followed by washing with DI water and
freeze-drying. Cell morphology in hydrogel was
observed by FE-SEM (Carl Zeiss, Germany).
Results and discussion
Gel formation of TOBE/ELP
Pure ELP, pure TOBC and TOBC/ELP mixture
solutions in vials all showed fluid-like states when
the vials were inverted at 20 �C. The turbidity of pure
ELP solution abruptly increased at 37 �C due to the
hydrophobic aggregation of ELP molecules, but this
mixture was still a fluid-like ELP suspension. Con-
versely, the temperature increase enabled hydrogel
formation from the TOBC/ELP mixture, as shown in
Fig. 1.
To determine the critical temperature that induces
hydrogel formation, changes in the turbidity of TOBC/
ELP mixtures were measured with thermo-regulated
UV/Vis spectrometry at 350 nm as a function of
temperature. The phase transition of TOBC/ELP
complexes started at *26 �C, a much lower temper-
ature (Fig. 2b) than the pure ELP solution (Fig. 2a).
a
Heating(37°C)
Cooling(20°C)
b c
Fig. 1 Temperature-triggered sol–gel transition of the TOBC/
ELP complex. a TOBC only, b ELP only and c TOBC/ELP
5
4
3
2
1
0
OD
(35
0 nm
)
50454035302520
Temperature (°C)
TOBC/ELP
ELP
Fig. 2 Turbidity variations of ELP and TOBC/ELP solutions as
a function of temperature (CD: 350 nm, heating: 1 �C/min)
Cellulose
123
ELPs were adsorbed onto the surface of TOBCs due to
electrostatic interactions, leading to a very high local
concentration of ELPs on the surface of TOBC.
Rheological analysis of TOBE/ELP hydrogel
Dynamic rheology is one of the most direct and
reliable way to determine the sol–gel transition of
polysaccharide hydrogels (Zhang et al. 2008; Brun-
Graeppi et al. 2010). The rheological properties of the
cellulose suspensions (Karppinen et al. 2011) and the
aggregation of the cellulose fibers (Myllytie et al.
2009) have been studied by mixing different polymers
with cellulose suspension.
Hydrogel formation was confirmed by dynamic
rheological analysis, which determined the change in
sample viscoelasticity as a function of temperature.
Measurements were carried out at angular frequency
of 1.0 rad/s and shear stress of 2.0 Pa. For both TOBC/
ELP complex and pure TOBC solutions, the elastic
modulus (G0) was always higher than the viscous
modulus (G00) throughout the whole temperature
range, as shown in Fig. 3a, b, indicating that elasticity
was dominant at both low and high temperatures
(Brun-Graeppi et al. 2010). In other words, either the
TOBC/ELP complex or the pure TOBC solution was
not a free-flowing fluid but a viscous semi-solid or
semi-transparent swollen gel at temperatures lower
than the Tt of ELP (Karppinen et al. 2011; Paakko
et al. 2007). This is possibly due to the high
concentration and relatively large size of TOBCs.
For the TOBC/ELP complex, G0 increased dramati-
cally as temperature increased. This is due to the
transition of semitransparent swollen gel to nontrans-
parent shrunken/solid gel. The decline of both G0 and
G00 at temperatures above the Tt of ELP was due to
phase separation, leading to the formation of a
biopolymer-rich phase and water-rich phase. The
sharp enhancement of G0 at around 30 �C was caused
by the folding and coacervation of ELPs adsorbed onto
the surface of TOBC, which acted as a physical
crosslinker between TOBC chains. Meanwhile, G0 and
G00 of TOBC/ELP complex were significantly
decreased after the transition compared with pure
ELP solution (Fig. 3a, c). It resulted from relatively
stiff cellulose nanofibers to hinder aggregation of ELP
molecules adsorbed onto the surface (Karppinen et al.
2011). The sharp enhancements of both G0 and G00
were not observed for pure TOBC solution as
temperature increased (Fig. 3b). However, a sharp
enhancement in G0 was observed for pure ELP
solution as temperature increased. This indicates that
colloidal ELP particles precipitated when the
24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
G',G
''(d
yn/c
m2 )
G' G''
ELP (20mg/ml)
24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 420
50
100
150
200
250
300
G',G
''(d
yn/c
m2 )
Temperature (°C)
G' G''
TOBC+ELP=1;1 (20mg/ml)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
G',G
'' (d
yn/c
m2 )
G' G''
TOBC (20mg/ml)
24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42
Temperature (°C)
Temperature (°C)
a
b
c
Fig. 3 Oscillatory temperature ramp measurements to confirm
hydrogel formation. a TOBC/ELP complex, b pure TOBC
solution and c pure ELP solution. Heating rate: 2 �C/min.
Sample concentration: 2 wt%
Cellulose
123
temperature increased, leading to a gel-like film on the
detecting plate surface.
Morphological analysis of TOBC/ELP hydrogel
After the temperature change of TOBC solution,
TOBC/ELP solution and TOBC/ELP hydrogel, the
samples were immediately dipped into liquid nitrogen
and then freeze-dried to keep the morphological
differences at the temperatures. As shown in FE-
SEM images, TOBC fibers were closely packed in
pure TOBC (Fig. 4a, a1). The density of TOBC fibers
stored in TOBC/ELP solution at 20 �C was lower than
the density in pure TOBC solution (Fig. 4b, b1).
ca b
c1a1 b1
c2a2 b2
TOBC/ELPTOBCd
200nm
200nm
Fig. 4 FE-SEM images of freeze-dried a TOBC, b TOBC/ELP solution (swollen gel) and c TOBC/ELP shrunken hydrogel. d AFM
images of TOBC and TOBC/ELP complex
Cellulose
123
TOBC, ELP and water were evenly mixed together to
form a single aqueous phase system. The phase
separation phenomenon occurred as the hydrogel
was formed at 37 �C, leading to two aqueous phases
inside the hydrogel, the biopolymer (ELP and TOBC)-
rich phase and water-rich phase. The water-rich phase
formed pores after freeze-drying due to the removal of
water from the region (Fig. 4c, c1).
ELPs were adsorbed onto the surface of TOBCs by
electrostatic interactions (Fig. 4b2), just as with pre-
viously reported protein/polysaccharide systems (de
Kruif et al. 2004; Schmitt et al. 1998; Turgeon et al.
2007). When the temperature increased above Tt, ELP
transitioned from hydrophilic to hydrophobic states by
exposing its hydrophobic side groups, driving ELPs to
fold and coacervate by hydrophobic interactions.
Therefore, TOBCs were held together when temper-
atures increased above Tt due to the coacervation of
ELPs adsorbed onto their surface. In addition, strong
hydrophobic interactions between ELPs led to the
formation of TOBC/ELP hybrid hydrogel by cross-
linking TOBCs tightly (Fig. 4c2). Due to high water
content in the water-rich phase, pores were left by
water sublimation after lyophilization, as shown in
Fig. 4c, c1.
AFM height images also verified the morphological
differences between pure TOBC and TOBC/ELP
complex (Fig. 4d). The root mean square roughness
(Rq) of a TOBC/ELP layer was *11 nm. It showed a
smoother surface compared with a TOBC layer
(Rq * 13 nm). TOBC nanofibers became thicker
due to ELP molecules adsorbed onto the surface.
The obvious difference in morphology was another
strong evidence that positively-charged ELPs were
spontaneously adsorbed onto the surface of nega-
tively-charged TOBC nanofibers through the electro-
static interaction.
Mechanism of TOBC/ELP hydrogel formation
Zeta potential is widely used for quantification of the
magnitude of the electrical charge at the double layer.
Although zeta potential is not equal to the electric
surface potential in the double layer, zeta potential is
often the only available path for characterization of
double-layer properties. From the experimentally-
determined electrophoretic mobility, pure ELP
showed a positive surface potential (or surface charge)
in distilled water at pH 6 due to its lysine residues
(Fig. 5). Conversely, TOBC had a very strongly
negative surface potential at pH 6 as a result of
TEMPO-oxidation. When TOBC and ELP were
mixed together, this strongly negative surface poten-
tial became weakened dramatically.
When the positively charged ELPs were deproto-
nated at high pH, the TOBC/ELP mixture lost its
ability to form a hydrogel. The pKa of the a-amino
group at the ELP N-terminus and the e-amino group in
the ELP lysine are 8.9 and 10.5, respectively. The
medium was adjusted to pH 12 to eliminate positive
surface charges of ELP derived from primary amines.
As shown in Fig. 6, a free-flowing milky suspension
was formed instead of a shrunken hydrogel when the
temperature increased to 37 �C. This was similar to
the behavior of pure ELP solution, shown in Fig. 1.
ELPs were adsorbed onto the TOBC surface through
electrostatic interactions at pH 6 to form a polypep-
tide–polysaccharide complex (Turgeon et al. 2007).
-140
-120
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
po
ten
tial
(m
V)
TOBC
TOBC/ELP
ELP
Fig. 5 n-Potential of ELP, TOBC and TOBC/ELP at 20 �C
Heating(37°C)
Cooling(20°C)
Fig. 6 Effect of pH on the formation of TOBC/ELP hydrogels.
The TOBC/ELP solution was adjusted to pH 12 to eliminate
positive charges on the ELP molecules. This resulted in the
inability to form a hydrogel despite increased temperature
Cellulose
123
Although phase separation is a very common
phenomenon in biopolymer mixtures, many research-
ers have demonstrated that this is not the case for
mixtures consisting of protein/polypeptide and
charged polysaccharide (Antonov et al. 1999;
Tolstoguzov 1991; Antonov and Wolf 2005). To
confirm whether ELP chains were adsorbed onto the
surface of TOBC backbones, the secondary ELP
structure was determined through CD and fluores-
cence measurements in the presence and absence of
TOBC. Pure ELP had a disordered secondary structure
with a negative peak around 198 nm at 10 �C (black
curve in Fig. 7). However, the intensity of this
negative peak was enhanced when pure ELP was
mixed with TOBC, indicating that the random-coil-
based disordered structure of ELP increased dramat-
ically (blue curve in Fig. 7). Altered secondary
structure in the presence of TOBC was consistent
with previous reports by other groups that reported
that the extent of protein secondary structures
increased with interactions between protein and poly-
saccharide (Turgeon et al. 2007). ELP molecules
transitioned into a more ordered state with a positive
peak around 212 nm when the temperature increased
to 50 �C (red curve in Fig. 7), indicating a beta-turn
structure (Cho et al. 2009; Nuhn and Klok 2008; Urry
1993). The more interesting result was that ELPs were
more disordered in the presence of TOBC despite the
Fig. 7 CD spectra of TOBC/ELP and ELP obtained at different
temperatures in water. ELP concentration was 0.5 mg/ml in
both the TOBC/ELP and pure ELP solutions. (Color figure
online)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Cel
l via
bili
ty (
%)
100
c d
a
5
Concentration of TOBC/ELP (mg/ml)
0.01 0.1 0.5 1.0 2.5
b
100
Fig. 8 a MTT results of the
TOBC/ELP solution. b FE-
SEM micrographs of cells
encapsulated in a TOBC/
ELP hydrogel. Fluorescence
microscopic images of
fibroblast cells encapsulated
in a TOBC/ELP hydrogel
after c 1 day and d 7 days of
incubation (cells were live/
dead stained.)
Cellulose
123
high temperature. This result was in the opposite
direction of pure ELP (green curve in Fig. 7). This
extraordinary phenomenon was attributed to the strong
electrostatic interaction between ELP and TOBC.
Biocompatibility of TOBC/ELP complex
MTT assay was used to assess the biocompatibility of
TOBC/ELP complexes and the proliferation of NIH-
3T3 fibroblast cells (Fig. 8a). Cell viability (%) was
calculated as the ratio of experimental sample OD
value to the control OD value. High fibroblast
viability was observed regardless of TOBC/ELP
concentration, as shown in Fig. 8a, indicating that
the TOBC/ELP complex was not cytotoxic. The
morphology of cells inside the hydrogel was observed
by FE-SEM. Cells bound to the hydrogel properly and
spread on the surface, as shown in Fig. 8b. The
viability of encapsulated cells was investigated by
live/dead staining. As shown in Fig. 8c, d, the number
of green spots inside the hydrogel increased after
7 days of incubation, indicating that most encapsu-
lated cells remained alive and continued to proliferate
inside the hydrogel.
Conclusions
A thermoresponsive hybrid hydrogel was prepared by
mixing negatively charged TOBC nanofibers and
positively charged ELP molecules containing lysine
residues. Positively charged ELPs were bound to the
surface of negatively charged TOBC by electrostatic
interactions to form a single phase. Increased temper-
ature triggered ELP folding and aggregation, leading
to the formation of a TOBC/ELP hybrid hydrogel.
Conformational analyses based on CD supported the
occurrence of electrostatic interactions between
TOBC and ELP. A cytotoxicity test showed that the
TOBC/ELP hydrogel was suitable for encapsulating
cells, indicating its potential for biomedical
applications.
Acknowledgments This research was supported by the Basic
Science Research Program through the National Research
Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of
Science, ICT & Future Planning (Grant Number 2013023612).
We also acknowledge support from the Research Institute for
Agriculture and Life Sciences.
References
Amin MCIM, Ahmad N, Halib N, Ahmad I (2012) Synthesis
and characterization of thermo- and pH-responsive bacte-
rial cellulose/acrylic acid hydrogels for drug delivery.
Carbohydr Polym 88(2):465–473
Antonov YA, Wolf BA (2005) Calorimetric and structural
investigation of the interaction between bovine serum
albumin and high molecular weight dextran in water.
Biomacromolecules 6(6):2980–2989
Antonov YA, Lefebvre J, Doublier JL (1999) On the one-phase
state of aqueous protein uncharged polymer systems:
casein–guar gum system. J Appl Polym Sci 71(3):471–
482
Bai YY, Zhang Z, Zhang AP, Chen L, He CL, Zhuang XL, Chen
XS (2012) Novel thermo- and pH-responsive hydroxy-
propyl cellulose- and poly (L-glutamic acid)-based mi-
crogels for oral insulin controlled release. Carbohydr
Polym 89(4):1207–1214
Bidwell GL, Raucher D (2010) Cell penetrating elastin-like
polypeptides for therapeutic peptide delivery. Adv Drug
Deliv Rev 62(15):1486–1496
Brun-Graeppi AKAS, Richard C, Bessodes M, Scherman D,
Narita T, Ducouret G, Merten OW (2010) Study on the sol–
gel transition of xyloglucan hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym
80(2):555–562
Chang CY, Zhang LN (2011) Cellulose-based hydrogels: pres-
ent status and application prospects. Carbohydr Polym
84(1):40–53
Chang CY, Lue A, Zhang L (2008) Effects of crosslinking
methods on structure and properties of cellulose/PVA
hydrogels. Macromol Chem Phys 209(12):1266–1273
Cheng J, Na K, Kim HS, Lee CK, Hyun J (2013) ‘‘Smart’’
microspheres for self-renewal of embryonic stem cells.
Macromol Res 21(2):134–136
Cho Y, Sagle LB, Iimura S, Zhang YJ, Kherb J, Chilkoti A,
Scholtz JM, Cremer PS (2009) Hydrogen bonding of beta-
turn structure is stabilized in D2O. J Am Chem Soc
131(42):15188–15193
de Kruif CG, Weinbreck F, de Vries R (2004) Complex coac-
ervation of proteins and anionic polysaccharides. Curr
Opin Colloid Interface Sci 9(5):340–349
Dong H, Snyder JF, Williams KS, Andzelm JW (2013) Cation-
induced hydrogels of cellulose nanofibrils with tunable
moduli. Biomacromolecules 14(9):3338–3345
Eichhorn SJ, Young RJ, Davies GR (2005) Modeling crystal and
molecular deformation in regenerated cellulose fibers.
Biomacromolecules 6(1):507–513
Ekici S (2011) Intelligent poly (N-isopropylacrylamide)-car-
boxymethyl cellulose full interpenetrating polymeric net-
works for protein adsorption studies. J Mater Sci
46(9):2843–2850
Fei B, Wach RA, Mitomo H, Yoshii F, Kume T (2000) Hydrogel
of biodegradable cellulose derivatives. I. Radiation-induced
crosslinking of CMC. J Appl Polym Sci 78(2):278–283
Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Wata T, Kumamoto Y, Isogai A (2009)
Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanof-
ibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomac-
romolecules 10(1):162–165
Cellulose
123
Halake KS, Lee J (2014) Superporous thermo-responsive
hydrogels by combination of cellulose fibers and aligned
micropores. Carbohydr Polym (in press)
Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H (2011) TEMPO-oxidized cel-
lulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 3(1):71–85
Karppinen A, Vesterinen AH, Saarinen T, Pietikainen P, Sep-
pala J (2011) Effect of cationic polymethacrylates on the
rheology and flocculation of microfibrillated cellulose.
Cellulose 18(6):1381–1390
Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindstrom T, Ankerfors M, Gray
D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-
based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50(24):5438–5466
Li L, Thangamathesvaran PM, Yue CY, Tam KC, Hu X, Lam
YC (2001) Gel network structure of methylcellulose in
water. Langmuir 17(26):8062–8068
Marci G, Mele G, Palmisano L, Pulito P, Sannino A (2006)
Environmentally sustainable production of cellulose-based
superabsorbent hydrogels. Green Chem 8(5):439–444
Meyer DE, Chilkoti A (2002) Genetically encoded synthesis of
protein-based polymers with precisely specified molecular
weight and sequence by recursive directional ligation:
examples from the elastin-like polypeptide system. Bio-
macromolecules 3(2):357–367
Myllytie P, Holappa S, Paltakari J, Laine J (2009) Effect of
polymers on aggregation of cellulose fibrils and its impli-
cation on strength development in wet paper web. Nord
Pulp Pap Res J 24(2):125–134
Nettles DL, Chilkoti A, Setton LA (2010) Applications of
elastin-like polypeptides in tissue engineering. Adv Drug
Deliv Rev 62(15):1479–1485
Nuhn H, Klok HA (2008) Secondary structure formation and
LCST behavior of short elastin-like peptides. Biomacro-
molecules 9(10):2755–2763
Ostlund A, Lundberg D, Nordstierna L, Holmberg K, Nyden M
(2009) Dissolution and gelation of cellulose in TBAF/
DMSO solutions: the roles of fluoride ions and water.
Biomacromolecules 10(9):2401–2407
Paakko M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, Nykanen A, Ahola S,
Osterberg M, Ruokolainen J, Laine J, Larsson PT, Ikkala
O, Lindstrom T (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis combined
with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogeniza-
tion for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Bio-
macromolecules 8(6):1934–1941
Saito T, Kimura S, Nishiyama Y, Isogai A (2007) Cellulose
nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of
native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 8(8):2485–2491
Schmitt C, Sanchez C, Desobry-Banon S, Hardy J (1998)
Structure and technofunctional properties of protein–
polysaccharide complexes: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci
Nutr 38(8):689–753
Silva SMC, Pinto FV, Antunes FE, Miguel MG, Sousa JJS, Pais
A (2008) Aggregation and gelation in hydroxypropylm-
ethyl cellulose aqueous solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci
327(2):333–340
Simnick AJ, Lim DW, Chow D, Chilkoti A (2007) Biomedical
and biotechnological applications of elastin-like polypep-
tides. Polym Rev 47(1):121–154
Tan JJ, Liu RG, Wang W, Liu WY, Tian Y, Wu M, Huang Y
(2010) Controllable aggregation and reversible pH sensi-
tivity of AuNPs regulated by carboxymethyl cellulose.
Langmuir 26(3):2093–2098
Tolstoguzov VB (1991) Functional properties of food proteins
and role of protein–polysaccharide interaction. Food Hy-
drocoll 4(6):429–468
Turgeon SL, Schmitt C, Sanchez C (2007) Protein–polysac-
charide complexes and coacervates. Curr Opin Colloid
Interface Sci 12(4–5):166–178
Urry DW (1993) Molecular machines: how motion and other
functions of living organisms can result from reversible
chemical-changes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
32(6):819–841
Zhang YY, Xu XJ, Zhang L (2008) Dynamic viscoelastic
behavior of triple helical lentinan in water: effect of tem-
perature. Carbohydr Polym 73(1):26–34
Zhang Z, Chen L, Zhao CW, Bai YY, Deng MX, Shan HL,
Zhuang XL, Chen XS, Jing XB (2011) Thermo- and pH-
responsive HPC-g-AA/AA hydrogels for controlled drug
delivery applications. Polymer 52(3):676–682
Zhao HB, Kwak JH, Wang Y, Franz JA, White JM, Holladay JE
(2007) Interactions between cellulose and N-methylmor-
pholine-N-oxide. Carbohydr Polym 67(1):97–103
Zhao Q, Qian JW, An QF, Gao CJ, Gui ZL, Jin HT (2009)
Synthesis and characterization of soluble chitosan/sodium
carboxymethyl cellulose polyelectrolyte complexes and
the pervaporation dehydration of their homogeneous
membranes. J Membr Sci 333(1–2):68–78
Cellulose
123