thermal energy storage and leed...

41
Thermal Energy Storage and LEED GOLD Mark M. MacCracken, PE, LEED AP , Pte CALMAC Mfg. Corp. Englewood, NJ USA Calmac.com ECOSTOCK 5-31-06

Upload: hoangdat

Post on 06-Jun-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Thermal Energy Storage and

LEED GOLD

Mark M. MacCracken, PE, LEEDAP, PteCALMAC Mfg. Corp.Englewood, NJ USA

Calmac.com

ECOSTOCK 5-31-06

Storage is Natural

Most common TES System

Water Heater (Electric) Assume one low-flow shower

((2.5gpm x 8.33 lb/gal x (110-60))

x 60 minutes/hr / 3,414 Btu/kW = 18.3 kW

Gas Water HeaterDesign Load = 2 Showers at a time18.3 kW x 2 x 3414 = 124,950 Btus

East Coast of US 100,000,000 people x 25% x 1/12 Hr/shower x 18.3 kW=

38 Gigawatts = CA Electric Peak on Summer day

TES has already impacted US infrastructure

4.5 kWHeater

Utility Load Factors* in the USA

50

55

60

65

70

Percent

1955 1965 1975 1985 1995Year *Load Factor = Avg. Load

Peak Load

ASHRAE 90.1 Base BuildingNon-Storage Electrical Profile

LightingFans

Pumps

Base Load

Cooling

0200400600800

100012001400160018002000

k W

Total kWh = 28,000/day

Peak Load2000 kW

Avg. Load

1050 kW

(Load Factor = 53%)

Design 30% better than 90.1 Non-Storage Electrical Profile

LightingFans

Pumps

Cooling

Base Load0

200400600800

100012001400160018002000

k

W Avg. Load

800 kW

Total kWh = 19,200/day

Peak Load1500 kW

(Load Factor = 53%)

Off Peak Cooling (OPC) Electrical Profile

Base LoadLighting

FansPumps

0200400600800

100012001400160018002000

k

W

Total kWh = 19,200/day (Load Factor = 88%)

Charging Storage

600 kW Shed

Avg. Load

800kW

40% Peak Load Reduction

Peak Load 900kW

Power continue to be less expensive at Night because of Generation Load Factor

4 Buildings x 1 Megawatt4 Buildings x 1 Megawatt= 4 Megawatts= 4 Megawatts

8,000 mW8,000 mW--h Soldh Sold

5 Buildings with TES @ 0.8 mW 5 Buildings with TES @ 0.8 mW = 4 Megawatts = 4 Megawatts

10,000 mW10,000 mW--h Sold!h Sold!

The same generator produces The same generator produces 25% more sellable kW25% more sellable kW--h!h!

3-D Electric Load Profile -- Full Year

4200 ton-hr of StorageInstalled 1990

Almost like Non-Storage System

TemperatureModulating Valve

Storage Tanks

Control Logic

Heat Transfer Fluid 75%H20/25%EG

Chiller Based SystemClosed System

So what is “Different”?

1 Bryant Park, New York CityBank of America / Durst Organization

History Channel “Sky Scrapers” 9-7-04

~2.2 Million ft2

Going for LEED Platinum

Thermal Storage Tank Ice-on-Coil Internal Melt

Expansion ChamberTank

Insulation Heat Exchanger

Coil & Glycol25

TemperatureControl Valve

31

1000 tonOn-Peak Load

500 tonChiller

25 31Ice

44

TemperatureControl Valve

54

500 tonChiller

44

Coil & Glycol

Ice500 tonLoad

52

TemperatureControl Valve

60

44

IceMeltedIce

Coil & Glycol

1000 tonLoad

500 tonChiller

44

34- 44

CentrifugalScrew Scroll

Reciprocating

How do you measure “Green”?

One Metric is….

LEED™ Green Building Rating System

Materials & Resources

Energy & Atmosphere

Water Efficiency

Sustainable Sites

Indoor Environmental Quality

LEEDTM Credits

Sustainable Sites: 14 pointsWater Efficiency: 5 pointsEnergy* & Atmosphere: 17 pointsMaterials & Resources: 13 pointsIndoor Environment Quality: 15 pointsInnovation & Design: 5 points

69 points

*10 Energy Credit are based on ASHRAE 90.1 which is based on Energy COST Reduction

William & Flora Hewlett FoundationLEED™ Gold

35% Energy Cost Reduction (5points)

www.usgbc.org

Project Overview

Project Overview

Lighting System•Indirect Natural Lightening •Operable Windows with Natural Ventilation•PV for 24 hour lights•Off –Peak Cooling system

Section

Basic Components (Calculated 90 ~ 100 ton Peak Load)

80 Ton Evaporative Condensing Chiller

1100 Ton-Hrs of Storage

Back Pressure

ICESTORAGE

CHILLER

Air Handlers

Regulating Valve

V1V2

P1

P2

Design Day Off-Peak Cooling System

0102030405060708090

100

12 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 12

Time

Tons

Making Ice-Meeting LoadIce DischargeChillers Meeting LoadIce Charge

Storage System80 ton Chiller

1,100 ton-hr Storage

Load Reduction90 ton or ~ 70 kW

ICEDISCHARGE

CHILLERS

Installed Chillers Max Capacity

ICECHARGE

Teamwork

• OwnerThe Hewlett Foundation

• Owner’s RepresentativeBennington/Conover & Associates

• Shell ArchitectB.H. Bocook Architects

• Interior Architecture and DesignHawley Peterson & Snyder Architects

• Landscape ArchitectThe Office of Cheryl Barton

• ContractorVance Brown, Inc.

• Environmental Building ConsultantSimon & Associates

Building for Sustainability

William & Flora Hewlett Foundation

The LEED™ Bandwagon

Air ForceEPAUS ArmyGSAUS NavyState Dept.ArizonaCaliforniaMaineMarylandMichigan

MissouriNew JerseyOregonNew YorkPennsylvaniaWashingtonWisconsinAlameda Cty, CAArlington Cty, VACook Cty., ILDane Cty., WI

King Cty., WASan Mateo Cty, CAArlington, MAAtlanta, GAAustin, TXBerkeley, CABoulder, CO.Bowie, MD.Chula Vista, CADallas, TXEugene, OR

Houston, TXKansas City, MOLos Angeles, CAOmaha, NEPhoenix, AZPleasanton, CASan Diego, CASan Francisco, CASan Jose, CASanta Monica, CASeattle, WA

Incomplete list of groups that mandate, encourage or reward LEED Certification or designs to LEED Criteria

Vancouver, BC, Portland, OR and Scottsdale, AZ require LEED Gold on municipal projects

Real reasons Off-Peak Cooling is Green:

1. It is much more Energy Efficient to create and deliver a kWh of Electricity at night then during the hot of the day.• Research from the California Energy Commission on 2 Cal. Utilities

Reports 8 to 34% savings in raw fuel when comparing On and Off Peak Operation!

• Heat Rates for Base Load Plants ~7,800 Btu/kWh vs. Peaking Plants ~9,400 to 14,00 Btu/kWh

2. The last power plants to come on during peak hours are normally the dirtiest per kW• Ashok Gupta (Director of Energy, NRDC) in NYTimes article “Peak

Shifting results in lower emissions because some of the plants used to meet demand peaks are among the dirtiest in the city”

• New CA Report by Greg Kats The Costs and Financial Benefits of Green Buildings states Peak power in CA is twice as dirty as Off Peak Power.

Other “Green” Issues

1. Safety Factors/Redundancy (Oversizing)• Well documented that oversizing chiller plants

creates less efficient real world operation.• Engineers have to protect their license

Storage is the Natural solution

Safety Factor and Redundancy Without Oversizing for same Cost

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

12 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 12

Time

Tons

Conventional System* 3-400 ton ChillersStorage System Excess CapacityDesign Day Load

Storage System2 - 400 ton Chiller

3,500 ton-hr Storage

* as per GSA Guideline P-100

Design Day Off-Peak Cooling System

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

12 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 12

Time

Tons

Discharge StorageChillers Meeting LoadCharge Storage

Storage System2- 400 ton Chillers

3,500 ton-hr Storage

500 ton Load Reductionor ~ 375 kWSTORAGE

DISCHARGE

CHILLERS(ONLY 500 TONS)

Installed Chillers Max Capacity

STORAGECHARGE

Capacity on Design Day with One Chiller Failure

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

12 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 12

Time

Tons

Storage System ShortfallStorageStorage Chiller

Conventional2- 400 ton Chillers

Storage System1- 400 ton Chiller

3,500 ton-hr Storage

Costs of Storage

What’s the Installed Cost of a ton of Chiller Plant?$1000/ton , $1200/ton, $1400/ton $1600/ton, $1800/ton

Storage Costs installed ~ $100 to $150 per ton-hrDepending on location, application and design

For each 1 ton of chiller you reduce you need about 8 to 9 ton-hrs of storage.

Costs are about the same

Other “Green” Issues

1. Safety Factors (Oversizing)• Well documented that oversizing chiller plants

creates less efficient real world operation.• Engineers have to protect their license

2. Efficiency and Water Use• Electric Chillers • Absorption Chillers

Chiller Energy and Water Efficiency Comparison

ChillerType

"Site"COP

EER KW/Ton SourceEnergyCOP*

Site HeatRejection

Factor

WaterUse

Increase

ElectricCentrifugal

6.0 20.5 0.58 2.00 1.1714,000 Btu/ton

---

Electric Screw or Centrifugal

Making Ice

5.0 17.1 0.70 1.66 1.2014,400 Btu/ton

3%

Electric Scroll 4.0 13.6 0.88 1.33 1.2515,000 Btu/ton

7%

Absorption(Double Effect)

1.2 1.20 1.8322,000 Btu/ton

57%

Absorption(Single Effect)

1.0 1.00 2.0024,000 Btu/ton

71%

*Assumes 33% National Electric Grid Efficiency

Thermal Energy Storage and Sustainable Buildings

(Ashrae Journal Sept 04)

Topics:LEEDWhy GreenSafety FactoryRedundancyBack-up Generation

16.6/kWh

8.2/kWh4.7/kWh4.7/kWh

Time Dependent Values August 20th

Units = k-Btu/kWh

18.1738976119.1439356324.1899984539.7929361246.2061036459.1503903453.8518701840.4994828134.9130579328.1761538623.6380170823.0608297

19.260322217.4933851716.9702282516.7382060815.6831227315.6831227315.2515129

15.0582488215.3188811

15.9428243517.0611877217.46917416

10am11am12pm1pm2pm3pm4pm5pm6pm7pm8pm9pm

10pm11pm

12am1am2am3am4am5am6am7am8am9am

4 x

2.4 x

The Plaza At PPL CenterAllentown, PA

Commercial Office, Retail New construction 280,000 sq. feetProject scope: 8-story Urban setting Completed July 2003 Ice Storage 2800 ton-hrRating: LEED Gold

Fossil Ridge HS – Poudre School DistrictFt. Collins, CO

LEED Gold290,000 ft2

Peak Load – 243 TonsActual Chiller – 125 Tons1280 Ton Hrs Ice Storage

Off-Peak Cooling… in over 6000 installations in 35 countries, many installed over 20 years ago

SummaryStorage is Nature’s way to Balance Supply and Demand

Engineer’s Paradigm must change. Instead of adding 20-30% to estimated Load, reduce by 20-30% and add Storage for Safety at no extra Cost.

Cool Storage reduces Operating CostsLoad on GridImpact on Environment

Questions?