the_process_of_land_redistriliution_in_a_rayaiaseema_village.pdf

Upload: radhakrishana-duddella

Post on 05-Jul-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/16/2019 The_Process_of_Land_Redistriliution_in_a_Rayaiaseema_Village.pdf

    1/12

    STAFF PAPER 4

    The Process of Land Radistribution

    in a Rayalaseeraa Village

    V. s. PARTHASARATHY

    INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CHANGE

    BANGALORE

  • 8/16/2019 The_Process_of_Land_Redistriliution_in_a_Rayaiaseema_Village.pdf

    2/12

    Copyright (c) by Institute for Social and Economic

    Change 1975

    Rs, 5-00

    PEINTED IN INDIA

    ay Kkiaatako PatiiJca Piivate Linitad aad Publiahad by Inati t i i+a for

    Soaia) aa d Ea oaon ic Cl idBga, BaB^alota 56 00 40

  • 8/16/2019 The_Process_of_Land_Redistriliution_in_a_Rayaiaseema_Village.pdf

    3/12

  • 8/16/2019 The_Process_of_Land_Redistriliution_in_a_Rayaiaseema_Village.pdf

    4/12

    ANDHRA PRADESH

    I Cuddapah District  

    Ptirom ToluK 

    Shnpalk

    M O 31 M ** 128 M p l E S

    MC t E , l i t c

  • 8/16/2019 The_Process_of_Land_Redistriliution_in_a_Rayaiaseema_Village.pdf

    5/12

    THE PROCESS OF LAND REDISTRIBUTION

    IN A RAVALASEEM A VILLAGE

  • 8/16/2019 The_Process_of_Land_Redistriliution_in_a_Rayaiaseema_Village.pdf

    6/12

    P R E F A C E

    This i s the fourth t i t l e in ISEC Staf f papers and has  

    been contr ibuted by Mr- V. S . P artha sarath y, a research  

    as s oc i a t e la th e S o c i o l o gy U n i t i n th e I n s t i tu te . T h e f ie ld  

    w or k oa w h i c h th e p ap e r w as b as e d w as u n d e r tak en b e for e  

    Mr . Par th as ar a th y jo i n e d th e I n s t itn te , b u t s u b s e q u e n t w ork  

    w as c om p l e te d w h e n i n th e I n s t itu te .

    T h e au th or h as s u c c e e d e d i n u n e ar th i n g a r a th e r u n i q u e  

    s ys t e m o f l and ow e r s h i p an d op e r a t i on c u r r e n tl y p r e va l en t  

    in a v i l lage in Andhra Pradesh . Je int ow ner sh ip wi th land  

     jo in t ly ow ne d and in d iv id u a l ly o p er a ted but w ith th e c u l t i

    va te d l an d c h an g i n g h an d s a t th e e n d o f e ve r y 12 ye ar s am i d  

    a sea o f pr ivate property in land ope rated ind iv idua l ly by  

    th e ir p r op r i e tor s or th e i r t e n an t s i s a s om e w h at a s to u n d

    i ng p h e n o m e n o n . I t i s p e r h ap s n o m o r e th an a h i s tor i c a 

    c u r i os ity , b u t m ay p r ove o f i n t e r e st t o s tu d e n t s s e e k i n g n e w  

    p ath w a ys to lan d r e form .

    ISFC has p leasure in making th i s s tudy avai lab le for a 

    wider publ ic .

    V. K. R. V. Rao  

    D i r e c tor

    I n s t i tu l c for S oc i a l an d E c on m i c C h an ge  

    Bangalore

  • 8/16/2019 The_Process_of_Land_Redistriliution_in_a_Rayaiaseema_Village.pdf

    7/12

    T H E P R O C E S S O F L A N D R E D I S T R I B U T I O N I N A  

    R A V A L A S E E M A V I L L A G E '

    T h i s s t u d y a t t e m p t s t o d e s c r i b e a u n i q u e t y p e o f l a n d  

    t e n u r e p r e v a l e n t t o t h i s d a y i n S h r i p a l ’ c ,- a h a m l e t o f   

    P e d c la p a l le v i l la g e in t h e R a y a l a s e e m a r e g i o n o f A n d h r a  

    P r a d e s h . T h e f ie ld w o r k w a s c o n d u c t e d d u r i n g J a n u a ry -  

    M a r c h , 1 9 6 9 . * - '

    T h e p e r i o d i c r e d i s t r ib u t i o n o f a r a b l e l an d w h i c h i s t h e  m a i n f e a t u r e o f t h is t e n u r e s e e m s t o h a v e b e e n a n i n h e r i

    t a n c e f r o m p r e - B r i t i s h t i m e s . It i s n o t k n o w n h o w w i d e s

    p r e a d i t w a s i n t h e r e g i o n b u t w h a t i s c e r t a i n is t h a t it 

    n o w o b t a i n s o n l y i n S h r i p a l l e . H o w e v e r , it i s r e p o r t e d

    t h a t i t w a s c u r r e n t i n a n e a r b y h a m l e t o f P u r a m t il l 1 9 6 2 .

    It i s w e l l - k n o w n t h a t in p r e - B r i t i s h I n d i a , d i f f e r e n t t y p e s  

    o f l a n d t e n u r e s w e r e p r e v a l e n t i n d i ff e r en t r e g i o n s a n d e v e n  

    w i t h i n t h e r e g i o n , i t v a r i e d f r o m a r e a t o a r e a . A p e r u s a l  

    o f B a d e n - P o w e l l ' s c l a ss ic w o r k , T h e L a n d S y s t e m s o f B r i t is h  

     In d ia   ( 1 K9 2) , w i ll g i v e e v i d e n c e o f t h i s f a c t. H o w e v e r , t h e  

    e s t a b l i s h m e n t o f  P a x B r i t la n ic a   i n t ro d u c e d s o m e s o r t o f  

    u n i f o r m i t y i n t h e t e n u r i a l s y s t e m s i n B r i t is h I n d i a , a l t h o u g h

    s o m e o f t h e e a r l i e r s y s t e m s o f l a n d t e n u r e s , l ik e  za m in d a r i ,  

     p a t t i d a r i , hhaichara,^   c o n t i n u e d t o e x i st . O f t h e d i ff e re n t  

    t en u r ia l s y s t e m s , t h e / y o / W f i r / sy s t e m i s t h e m o s t c o m m o n .

    S i n c e I n d e p e n d e n c e in 19 47 ,  z a m in d a r i   a n d inam   s y s t e m s  

    h a v e b e e n a b o l i s h e d , a n d u n d e r t h e l a n d r e f o r m s t h a t a r e  

    b e i n g i n t r o d u c e d t h r o u g h o u t t h e c o u n t r y , t h e o l d s y s t e m s  

    o f d i v e r s e l a n d t e n u r e s w i l l b e r e p l a c e d e v e n t u iU l y b y a  

    s i n g l e s y s t e m . G i v e n t h i s o v e r a l l s i t u a t i o n , t h e f u t u r e o f  

    t h e t y p e o f l a n d t e n u r e , I a m d e s c r i b i n g i n t h i s s t u d y , is  

    a m a t t e r f o r s p e c u l a t i o n

  • 8/16/2019 The_Process_of_Land_Redistriliution_in_a_Rayaiaseema_Village.pdf

    8/12

    W hat makes the present s tudy in teres t ing is the fact

    th at th is sys tem has survived not only the tenurial changes

     b rought abo u t du ring the Brit ish times but also those occur-

    ring durin g the postJndepen dence years. This is atte sted

     by th e fact tha t the revenue of fi cial s o f C ud dapah D is t r ic t

    were unaw are o f the existence of the periodic red is t r ibu-

    tion of land in Shripalle a nd it was only accidentally dis-

    covered by thern du ring the  jam ab and i  (annual checking o f

    village accounts) in 1966,

    I t may be poin ted out here that the present s tudy f its

    in with similar studies con duct ed in o ther societies, Special

    me nt ion may be made in th is contex t of Obeyesekere’s

    study,  L and Tenure in V il la ge C eylo n  (1967), which

    repo rts the existence of a similar tenure .

    I I

    Shripalle vil lagers did not know how this tenurial

    system cam e ab ou t, and only said that i t was in existence

    since t ime s immemorial . In 1805, Sir Thom as Mu nro, the

    fam ous Bri t ish adm inis t ra tor , refe rred to the prevalence of

    t h e visapadi  sys tem o f land tenure in the Cud dapah province

    in o ne of h is le t ters to the B oard of Revenue. He observed:

    “ In all v i llages , the ryots are in the habi t o f

    meet ing and debat ing upon the subject of rent ; but

    there are ma ny villages in which they sett le amo ng

    themselves th e exact propo rt ion of the whole rent

    th at each individual is to pay, These are called visapadi 

    or sixteenth vil lage, fro m the land and ren t being divided

    in to s ix teenth shares ; and they comprise a considerable

     par t o f the Cuddapah province When the season o f 

    cultivation draws near, all the ryots of visapadi   villages

    assemble to regulate their several rents for the year .

    The Pag oda is the place usually chosen for this purposcp

    from the idea tha t i ts sanctity will rende r thei r engage

  • 8/16/2019 The_Process_of_Land_Redistriliution_in_a_Rayaiaseema_Village.pdf

    9/12

    m c n ts w i th e ac h o th e r th e m or e bi nd in g* T h e y as c e r ta in  

    th e a m o u n t o f th e agr ic u l tu r a l s toc k o f th e i n d iv i d u a l 

    an d o f th e w h o l e b od y , th e q u an t i t i e s o f th e l and to  

    th e c u l tu r e o f w h i c h it i s ad e q u ate an d th e y d i v i d e i t 

    a c c o r d i n g l y , g i v i n g t o e a ch m a n t h e p o r t i o n w h i c h h e 

    h as th e m e an s o f c u l t i va t i n g , an d f ix in g h is s h ar e o f th e  

    rent , and wh ether h i s share be one or tw o s ixteenth s  

    h e p ays th is p r op or t i on w h e th e r th e w h o l e r e nt o f th e  

    vi l lage be h igher or lower than las t yea r’ ’ (D is t r i c t 

    Gazet teer ,   1967 ; 49 4 ’).

    C . F . B r ac k e n b u r y h as th e fo l l ow i n g c om m e n ts on  

    th e visapadi   system:

    “ T h i s w o u l d s ee m t o p o i n t t o b a n d s o f c o l o n i s t s  

    or ig inal ly se t t l ing on the land in a sort o f agr icu ltural 

    p ar tn e r s h ip , an d d ou b t l e s s th e jo i n t i n t er e s t an d r e s p on s i

    b i l i ty were re ta ined in later t ime s as a m eans o f res i s t

    i n g an d o f b e ar i n g u p aga i n s t th e h e avy as s e s m e n t s  imp osed . The qu es t ion o f property in the land and to  

    who m it be lo ngs can hardly be sa id to ar i se when  

    h o l d i n gs ar e i n t e r - c h an ge ab l e or s u b je ct t o r e d i s t ri b u t ion .  

    T h e r e a ll y i m p or tan t th i n g i s th e d i v i s i on o f th e p r od u c e  

    wh ich as far as the ryots are conc erne d under the  

    visapadi   sy s tem was regulated by the contr ibut ion made  

    to th e c om m on s toc k . T h e S ta te , h ow e v e r , a l s o a s s e r te d  

    i ts r i gh t s t o a s h are , th e e x ten t o f w h i c h th e S ta te  

    i t s e l f d e t e r m i n e d ” (D is t r i c t Gaze t t eer .  19 15 : 147).

    I t i s c l ear from these . s tatements that the per iod ical re

    d i s t r i b u t i on o f lan d am on g th e l oc a l agr i c u l tu r i s t s w as a 

    f e a tur e o f th e visapadi  s y s t e m . T h e S ta te a t th a t t i m e w as  

    only in lere .s ted in i ts share o f the reven ue and as long as  

    that was secured , it was ind i f ferent to what hap pened in 

    the v i l lage and d id not in terfere in i t s in ternal orga nisat ion .  

    B ut th e i n t r od u c t i on o f th e  ryo tw ar i   sys tem in many parts

  • 8/16/2019 The_Process_of_Land_Redistriliution_in_a_Rayaiaseema_Village.pdf

    10/12

    of India by the Brit ish in which each individual own er was

    made responsible for paying the revenue on his land, seems

    to have been responsib le for the d isappearanc e of the

    visapadi   system.

    There is variation betw een the system tha t was found

    in Shripalle and that described by M unr o and others. In

    the former, the extent of land which is periodical ly redis-

    tribu ted is only abou t 1/lOth of tha t am oun t available in the

    vil lage. As agains t the annua l redis t r ibut ion described by

    Brac kenbur y, the land in Shripalle is redistr ibuted once intwelve years. How ever, there seems to have been variation

    fro m village to vil lage with regard to the interva l at which

    land was redis t r ibuted . For ins tance, the Pura m hamlet

    which I men tioned earlier had a sixyearly redistr ibution

    system.

    I l l

    Shripal le , was one of the seven hamlets of Peddapal le

    village.

    Pedd apalle was well conn ecte d by roa d, being directly

    l inked by bus to the d is t r ic t headquarters , C uddapah. The

    neares t ra i lhead was Puram on the MadrasBorabay b road

    gauge l ine, and was about four miles from Peddapalle.

    According to the 1961 Census, the populatio n of Pedd a-

     palle was 3,127, d is tr ibuted over se ve n ham lets . It c om -

     prised Brahmins, K apus, Bal'jas, Vaishyas, Bhatrajus, Vis hwa

    Brahm ins, Nayi Brahmins, Cliakalis , Bhainenis, Mu trach as,

    Errakulas , Malas , Chris t ians and Musl ims. The Hari jans andMusl ims were the two nume rical ly s t rongest groups.

    The cas te groups ment ioned above were d is t r ibuted in

    the several hamlets which forme d pa rt of the main village.

    It was interesting th at no K apu (Red di) family resided ia

    the main vil lage, being distributed only in the ham lets The

    absence of Ka pus in the main vil lage was attr ibu ted by

  • 8/16/2019 The_Process_of_Land_Redistriliution_in_a_Rayaiaseema_Village.pdf

    11/12

    the vil lagers to the curse of the local godde ss, w ho appeared in a dream to an ancestor o f the vil lage  M unsiff  (headman)  

    o f Peddapalle , and told him that no Kapu should reside 

    there.

    The com pos it ion of castes varied from hamlet to hamlet .  

    (For the present purpose, s ince I am concentrating on  

    Shripal le only , I shal l not be going into the com posit ion  

    o f the other h am lets . ) Each h amlet had a s i zeable popu la

    tion and appeared as a ful l -blow n vi i lace in i tsel f but for 

    revenue purposes the hamlets were treated as part o f the  

    main village-

    The hamlet Shripa lle was a bou t a mile from the main  

    vi l lage in the north-east direction, and was connected to i t 

    by a cart track. There were a number of good houses

    bui l t of Cuddapah ston e (a variety of black stone avai lable

    in the vicinity o f Cuddapah and hence the name) and were 

    mostly owned by Kapus. There was a small temple to the deity  

    Rama in the hamlet which was used for hamlet meetings.  

    In addit ion, there were temples to Hariswam y and Krishna, 

    the latter b eing on the vil lage outskirts.

    Shripa lle had a popu latio n o f 507 in 1969 and the break

    dow n by caste is given in T able 1,

    The aim o f this study is pe riodic land re-distribution  

    and the refo re, it is con cern ed only minimally with the struc

    tural relations betwe en va rious castes in Shrjpalle-

    Kapu and Malas were the preponderant groups in Shr i

    palle. I ll terms o f eco no m ic and numerical posi tion, Kapus  

    dom inated the ham let and ow ned mos t of the land in it . 

    The Kapus were divided into two sub-castes . In the re

    gion as a whole ,Peddaka nti , Mo tati , Ko dide and Pokanati

    Kapus were numerous, but only M otati and Po ganati Kapus  

    were found in the hamlet . Motatis were an endogam ous  

    group but there seemed to be no restriction to Pokanatis

  • 8/16/2019 The_Process_of_Land_Redistriliution_in_a_Rayaiaseema_Village.pdf

    12/12

    g e t t in g m a r ri ed in t o a n y o t h e r s u b - d i v is i o n o f K a p u s , O f   

    t h e 2 6 K a p u h o u s e h o l d s , f o ur w e r e i m m i g r a n t s f r o m n e i g h

    b o u r i n g v i l l a g e s .

    T a b l e 1

    Caste Traditional

    calling

    No. of

    households

    Population

    Kapu Peasant 26   230

    Mala Labourer 24   100

    Mutracha   Watchman 13 SS

    Togata Weaver   6 33Yadava Cowherd 6 29

    Mala Christian Labourer   3   13

    Bhatraju Bard   2 12

    Vaishya   Trader 3   10

    Balifa Trader   1   6

    Muslim Itinerant Trader

    and Labourer 1 6

    Bajaka Washerman 1 5

    Mangali Barber 1 5

    Christian Labourer   1   3

    88 507

    K a p u s a n d Y a d a v a s w e r e t h e o n l y l a n d o w n e r s i n S h r i-  

    p a l l e , th e o t h e r c a s t e s b e i n g e i t h e r l a n d l e s s l a b o u re r s o r  

    d e p e n d e n t i n ot h er w a y s o n t h e d o m i n a n t c a s t e f o r l i v e li h o o d .  

    T h i s , o f c o u r s e , d i d n o t a p p l y t o t h e V a i s h y a s , w h o w e r e 

    t r a d e rs . T h e . s e rv i c in g c a s t e s , n a m e l y t h e B a r b e rs a n d W a s h e r

    m e n , h a d  j a j m a n i   r e l a t i o n s h i p w it h t h e K a p u s w h i l e t h e  

    H a r i j a n s a n d M u t r a c h a s s u p p l ie d a g r i c u lt u r a l a s w e l l a s  

    d o m e s t ic s e rv a n t s. T h o u g h Y a d a v a s w e r e l a n d o w n e r s , t h ey  

    d i d n o t h a v e m u c h o f a s a y i n v i l l a g e a f f a ir s i n v i e w  

    o f t he ir n u m e r i ca l s iz e a n d w e a k e c o n o m i c p o s i t i o n .

    G e n e r a l l y s p e a k i n g , K a p u s h a d a m o r e u r b a n s t y le o f   

    l if e t h a n t h e o t h e r c a s t e s, t h e b e t t e r - o f f K a p u s h a v i n g e l e c -