theory of metal cuttingtool geometry

25
LECTURE-07 THEORY OF METAL CUTTING - Tool Geometry NIKHIL R. DHAR, Ph. D. DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL & PRODUCTION ENGINEERING BUET

Upload: kaderekibriaovee

Post on 26-Jan-2016

233 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

IPE

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

LECTURE-07THEORY OF METAL CUTTING

- Tool Geometry

NIKHIL R. DHAR, Ph. D.DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL & PRODUCTION

ENGINEERINGBUET

Page 2: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/2Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Introduction

Production or manufacturing of any object is a value addition process by which raw material of low utility and value due to its irregular size, shape and finish is converted into a high utility and valued product with definite size, shape and finish imparting some desired function ability.

Machining is an essential process of semi-finishing and often finishing by which jobs of desired shape and dimensions are produced by removing extra material from the preformed blanks in the form of chips with the help of cutting tools moved past the work surfaces in machine tools. The chips are separated from the workpiece by means of a cutting tool that possesses a very high hardness compared with that of the workpiece, as well as certain geometrical characteristics that depend upon the conditions of the cutting operation. Among all of the manufacturing methods, metal cutting, commonly called machining; is perhaps the most important. Forgings and castings are subjected to subsequent machining operations to acquire the precise dimensions and surface finish required. Also, products can sometimes be manufactured by machining stock materials like bars, plates, or structural sections.

Page 3: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/3Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Methods of Machining

In the metal cutting operation, the tool is wedge-shaped and has a straight cutting edge. Basically, there are two methods of metal cutting, depending upon the arrangement of the cutting edge with respect to the direction of relative work-tool motion: Orthogonal cutting or two dimensional cutting Oblique cutting or three dimensioning cutting.

Orthogonal Machining Oblique

Machining

Page 4: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/4Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Orthogonal Cutting

The cutting edge of the tool remains at 900 to the direction of feed (of the tool or the work)The chip flows in a direction normal to the cutting edge of the toolThe cutting edge of the tool has zero inclination with the normal to the feedThe chip flows in the plane of the tool face. Therefore, it makes no angle with the normal (in the plane of the tool face) to the cutting.The shear force acts on a smaller area, so shear force per unit area is more.

The tool life is smaller than obtained in oblique cutting (for same conditions of cutting)There are only two mutually perpendicular components of cutting forces on the toolThe cutting edge is bigger than the width of cut.

Page 5: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/5Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Oblique Cutting

The cutting edge of the tool remains inclined at an acute angle to the direction of feed (of the work or tool)The direction of the chip flow is not normal to the cutting edge. Rather it is at an angle β to the normal to the cutting edge.The cutting edge is inclined at an angle λ to the normal to the feed. This angle is called inclination angle.The chip flows at an angle β to the normal to the cutting edge. This angle is called chip flow angle.

The chip flows at an angle β to the normal to the cutting edge. This angle is called chip flow angle.The shear force acts on a larger area, hence the shear force per area is smallerThe tool life is higher than obtained in orthogonal cuttingThere are only three mutually perpendicular components of cutting forces on the toolThe cutting edge is smaller than the width of cut.

Page 6: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/6Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Cutting Tool Geometry

Cutting tool is device with which a material could be cut to the desired size, shape or finish. So a cutting tool must have at least a sharp edge. There are two types of cutting tool. The tool having only one cutting edge is called single point cutting tools. For example shaper tools, lathe tools, planer tools, etc. The tool having more than one cutting edge is called multipoint cutting tools. For example drills, milling cutters, broaches, grinding wheel honing tool etc.

A single point cutting tool may be either right or left hand cut tool depending on the direction of feed.

Primary Cutting Edge

Right hand cutting tool

Left hand cutting tool

Page 7: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/7Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Tool-in-hand Nomenclature

The geometry of a cutting tool consists of the following elements: face or rake surface, flank, cutting edges and the corner. Face or rake is the surface of the cutting tool along which the chips flow out. Flank surfaces are those facing the work piece. There are two flank surfaces, principal and auxiliary flank surfaces. Principal cutting edge performs the major portion of cutting and is formed by the intersecting line of the face with the principal flank surface. Auxiliary cutting edge (often called end cutting edge) is formed by the intersection of the rake surface with the auxiliary flank surface. Corner or cutting point is the meeting point of the principal cutting edge with the auxiliary cutting edge.

Auxiliary flank surface

Corner

Principal cutting edge

Rake or Face

Shank of tool

Tool axis

Principal flank surface

Auxiliary cutting edge

Page 8: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/8Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Single Point Cutting Tool

Side clearance angle (αx)

Nose radius (r)

Side cutting edge angle (φs)

Back rake angle (γy)

End clearance angle (αy)

End cutting edge angle (φe)

Side rake angle (γx)

Note: All the rake and clearance angles are measured in normal direction

Page 9: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/9Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Side Cutting Edge Angle (φs): The side cutting-edge angle (SCEA) is usually referred to as the lead angle. It is the angle enclosed between the side cutting edge and the longitudinal direction of the tool. The value of this angle varies between 0° and 90°, depending upon the machinability, rigidity, and, sometimes, the shape of the workpiece. As this angle increases from 0° to 15°, the power consumption during cutting decreases. However, there is a limit for increasing the SCEA, beyond which excessive vibrations take place because of the large tool-workpiece interface. On the other hand, if the angle were taken as 0°, the full cutting edge would start to cut the workpiece at once, causing an initial shock. Usually, the recommended value for the lead angle should range between 15° and 30°.

Page 10: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/10Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Auxiliary or End Cutting Edge Angle (φe): The end cutting-edge angle (ECEA) serves to eliminate rubbing between the end cutting edge and the machined surface of the workpiece. Although this angle takes values in the range of 5° to 30°, commonly recommended values are 8° to 15°. Side Clearance Angle (αx) and End Clearance Angle (αy): Side and end clearance (relief) angles serve to eliminate rubbing between the workpiece and the side and end flank, respectively. Usually, the value of each of these angles ranges between 5° and 15°.

Page 11: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/11Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Back Rake Angle (γy) and Side Rake Angle (γX): Back and side rake angles determine the direction of flow of the chips onto the face of the tool. Rake angles can be positive, negative, or zero. It is the side rake angle that has the dominant influence on cutting. Its value usually varies between 0° and 15°, whereas the back rake angle is usually taken as 0°. Nose radius (r): Nose radius is favorable to long tool life and good surface finish. A sharp point on the end of a tool is highly stressed, short lived and leaves a groove in the path of cut. There is an improvement in surface finish and permissible cutting speed as nose radius is increased from zero value. Too large a nose radius will induce chatter.

Page 12: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/12Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Designation of Cutting Tools

By designation or nomenclature of a cutting tool is meant the designation of the shape of the cutting part of the tool. The following systems to designate the cutting tool shape which are widely used are:

Tool in Hand System Machine Reference System or American Standard Association (ASA)

System Tool Reference System

Orthogonal Rake System (ORS)Normal Rake System (NRS)

Maximum Rake System (MRS) Work Reference System (WRS)

Page 13: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/13Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Tool Reference System

The references from which the tool angles are specified are the Reference plane (πR)

Machine longitudinal plane (πx)

Machine transverse plane (πy)

Principal cutting plane (πc)

Orthogonal plane (πo) and

Normal plane (πn)

The reference plane (πR) is the plane perpendicular to the cutting velocity (Vc). The machine longitudinal plane (πx) is the plane perpendicular to πR and taken in the direction of feed (longitudinal feed). The machine transverse plane (πy) is the plane perpendicular to both πR and πX or plane perpendicular to πR and taken in the direction of cross feed. The principal cutting plane (πc) is the plane perpendicular to πR and containing the principal cutting edge. The orthogonal plane (πo) is the plane perpendicular to πR and πc. The normal plane (πn) is perpendicular to the principal cutting edge.

Page 14: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/14Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Page 15: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/15Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

American Standard Association System

Tool Character

γy γx αy αx φe φs r

50 100 70 80 200 300 1/32

γyBack rake angle

γxSide rake angle

αyBack or end clearance angle

αxSide clearance angle

φeAuxiliary or End cutting edge angle

φsSide cutting edge angle (90o-φ)

r Nose radius (inch)

φe

Ym

ΠR

αx

ΠX

αy

γy

ΠY

Zm

Ym

φs

B BA

A

Xm

Section B-B

Section A-A

γX

Xm

Zm

φ

Page 16: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/16Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Orthogonal Rake System (ORS)

Tool Character

λ γ0 α0 α0/ φe φ r

50 100 70 80 200 300 0.8 mm

λ Inclination angleγ0 Orthogonal rake angleα0 Orthogonal clearance angle

α0/ Auxiliary orthogonal

clearance angle

φeAuxiliary or End cutting edge angle

φPrincipal cutting edge angle (90-φs)

r Nose radius (mm)

φφe

ΠRφs

M

M

N

N

Section M-M

Section N-N

αoΠO

XoZo

γo

ΠC

λ

YoZo

αo/

Πc/

γo/

Xo

Yo

Page 17: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/17Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Interconversion Between ASA and ORS

Interrelations can be established between ASA and ORS and vice versa. Various methods are used for developing such interrelationships such as

Method of projection Method of slopes Method of master line Circle diagram Vector methods, etc.

Page 18: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/18Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Methods of Master Line for Rake Angles

For T=1OA= cot λOB= cot γy

OC= cot γo

OD= cot γx

OM= cot γm

OA=T cot λOB=T cot γy

OC=T cot γo

OD=T cot γx

OM=T cot γm

T=Depth of the cutting tool

ΠC

G

T

γm

φs

O

B/

αy

αx

γy

Xm

Ym

Xo

Xm

ΠR

ΠY

γx

λ

φ

A

B

C

A/

C/

D

αoΠOYo

Xo Zo

Xo

ΠX

γo

D/

Master line

M

Zm

YoZm

Zm

φγ

H

E

F

M

φγ Setting angle for grinding rake surfaceγm Maximum rake angle

Page 19: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/19Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Prove the followings by master line methods for a single point cutting tool.

o

2o

2m

oy

ox

yx

yxo

tanγ

tanλtanφφ (vi)

λtanγtan tan γ(v)

φsin λ tan φ cos tan γ tan γ(iv)

φ cos λ tan - φsin tan γ tan γ(iii)

φsin tan γφ cos tan γ tan (ii)

φ cos tan γφsin tan γ tan γ(i)

φγ Setting angle for grinding rake surfaceγm Maximum rake angle

Page 20: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/20Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

OA= cot λOB= cot γy

OC= cot γo

OD= cot γx

OM= cot γm

O

Xm

Ym

φ

A

BC

D

Yo

Master line

M

φγ

H

E

F

Xo

tan γo = tan γx sin φ + tan γy cos φ

From Figure ΔOBD=ΔOBC+ΔOCD½OB.OD=½OB.CE + ½OD.CF½OB.OD=½OB.OC sin φ + ½OD.OC. cos φDividing on both sides by ½OB.OC.OD

OB

cos

OD

sinφ

OC

1

tan γo = tan γx sin φ + tan γy cos φ

tan λ = -tan γx cos φ +tan γy sin φ

From Figure ΔOAD = ΔOAB +ΔOBD½ OD. AG = ½ OB. AH + ½ OB.OD½ OD. OA. sin φ=½OB.OA COS φ + ½OB.ODDividing on both sides by ½OA.OB.OD

OA

1

OD

cosφ

OB

sinφ

tan λ = -tan γx cos φ +tan γy sin φ

G

Page 21: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/21Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Methods of Master Line for Clearance Angles

ΠC

D/

T

αm

φs

O

B/

αx

αy

γx

Xm

Ym

Xo

Xm

ΠR

ΠY

γy

λ

φ

A

B C

A/

C/

D

αo ΠOYo

Xo Zo

Ym

ΠX

γo

M

Zm

YoZm

Zm

Master line

φα

OA=T cot λOB=T tan αy

OC=T tan αo

OD=T tan αx

OM=T an αm

T=Depth of the cutting tool

For T=1OA= cot λOB= tan αy

OC= tan αo

OD= tan αx

OM= tan αm

φα Setting angle for grinding principal rake surfaceαm Maximum rake angle

Page 22: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/22Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Prove the followings by master line methods for a single point cutting tool.

cotλ

αtan tanφφ (vi)

λtanαcotαcot (v)

φsin λ tan φ cos αcot αcot (iv)

φ cos λ tan - φsin αcot αcot (iii)

φsin αcot φ cos αcot λ tan (ii)

φ cos αcot φsin αcot αcot (i)

o1α

2o

2m

oy

ox

yx

yxo

φα Setting angle for grinding principal rake surfaceαm Maximum rake angle

Page 23: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/23Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

For T=1OA= cot λOB= tan αy

OC= tan αo

OD= tan αx

OM= tan αm

φα

F

E

G O

M

DC

B

Ym

A

Master line

H

Xm

YoXo

φ

cot αo = cot αx sin φ + cot αy cos φ

From Figure ΔOBD=ΔOBC+ΔOCD½OB.OD=½OB.CE + ½OD.CF½OB.OD=½OB.OC sin φ + ½OD.OC. cos φDividing on both sides by ½OB.OC.OD

OB

cos

OD

sinφ

OC

1

cot αo = cot αx sin φ + cot αy cos φ

tan λ = -cot αx cos φ +cot αy sin φ

From Figure ΔOAD = ΔOAB +ΔOBD½ OD. AG = ½ OB. AH + ½ OB.OD½ OD. OA. sin φ=½OB.OA COS φ + ½OB.ODDividing on both sides by ½OA.OB.OD

OA

1

OD

cosφ

OB

sinφ

tan λ = -cot αx cos φ +cot αy sin φ

Page 24: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/24Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Assignment-1

Prove by Master Line Method

o

2o

2m

oy

ox

yx

yxo

tanγ

tanλtanφφ (vi)

λtanγtan tan γ(v)

φsin λ tan φ cos tan γ tan γ(iv)

φ cos λ tan - φsin tan γ tan γ(iii)

φsin tan γφ cos tan γ tan (ii)

φ cos tan γφsin tan γ tan γ(i)

cotλ

αtan tanφφ (vi)

λtanαcotαcot (v)

φsin λ tan φ cos αcot αcot (iv)

φ cos λ tan - φsin αcot αcot (iii)

φsin αcot φ cos αcot λ tan (ii)

φ cos αcot φsin αcot αcot (i)

o1α

2o

2m

oy

ox

yx

yxo

Page 25: Theory of Metal CuttingTool Geometry

25/25Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION