the wroblewski parameter from lattice qcdneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · the wroblewski parameter...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD
Workshop on Field Theories Near EquilibriumRajiv V. Gavai
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 1
![Page 2: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD
Workshop on Field Theories Near EquilibriumRajiv V. Gavai
Introdution
λs from Quark Number Susceptibility
Pressure for small baryon density
Summary
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 1
![Page 3: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Introduction
• Quark-Gluon Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions.
• Reliable signals needed to establish it.
• Enhancement of strangeness production as a promising signal of QGP(Rafelski-Muller, Phys. Rev. Lett ’82, Phys. Rept ’86..).
• A variety of aspects studied and many different variations proposed.
• Most signal considerations based on Simple Models.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 2
![Page 4: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Introduction
• Quark-Gluon Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions.
• Reliable signals needed to establish it.
• Enhancement of strangeness production as a promising signal of QGP(Rafelski-Muller, Phys. Rev. Lett ’82, Phys. Rept ’86..).
• A variety of aspects studied and many different variations proposed.
• Most signal considerations based on Simple Models.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 2
![Page 5: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Introduction
• Quark-Gluon Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions.
• Reliable signals needed to establish it.
• Enhancement of strangeness production as a promising signal of QGP(Rafelski-Muller, Phys. Rev. Lett ’82, Phys. Rept ’86..).
• A variety of aspects studied and many different variations proposed.
• Most signal considerations based on Simple Models.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 2
![Page 6: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Introduction
• Quark-Gluon Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions.
• Reliable signals needed to establish it.
• Enhancement of strangeness production as a promising signal of QGP(Rafelski-Muller, Phys. Rev. Lett ’82, Phys. Rept ’86..).
• A variety of aspects studied and many different variations proposed.
• Most signal considerations based on Simple Models.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 2
![Page 7: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
FromSTAR
Webpage
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 3
![Page 8: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Ratio of newly createdstrange quarks to lightquarks :
λs =2〈ss〉〈uu+ dd〉
(1)
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 4
![Page 9: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Wroblewski Parameter
• Hadron gas fireball model(Becattini-Heinz ’97).
• 3 Free parameters : T , V , andNss.
• Fit many hadron abundunces.
• Obtain λs from data.
• Find λs ∼ 0.4 (0.2) for AA(pp).
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 5
![Page 10: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Wroblewski Parameter
• Hadron gas fireball model(Becattini-Heinz ’97).
• 3 Free parameters : T , V , andNss.
• Fit many hadron abundunces.
• Obtain λs from data.
• Find λs ∼ 0.4 (0.2) for AA(pp).
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 5
![Page 11: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Wroblewski Parameter
• Hadron gas fireball model(Becattini-Heinz ’97).
• 3 Free parameters : T , V , andNss.
• Fit many hadron abundunces.
• Obtain λs from data.
• Find λs ∼ 0.4 (0.2) for AA(pp).
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 5
![Page 12: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Wroblewski Parameter
• Hadron gas fireball model(Becattini-Heinz ’97).
• 3 Free parameters : T , V , andNss.
• Fit many hadron abundunces.
• Obtain λs from data.
• Find λs ∼ 0.4 (0.2) for AA(pp).
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 5
![Page 13: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Wroblewski Parameter
• Hadron gas fireball model(Becattini-Heinz ’97).
• 3 Free parameters : T , V , andNss.
• Fit many hadron abundunces.
• Obtain λs from data.
• Find λs ∼ 0.4 (0.2) for AA(pp).
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 5
![Page 14: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Quark Number Susceptibility
♠ We have argued that
λs =2χs
χu + χd. (2)
(Gavai & Gupta, PR D ’02 )
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 6
![Page 15: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Quark Number Susceptibility
♠ We have argued that
λs =2χs
χu + χd. (2)
(Gavai & Gupta, PR D ’02 )
♠ Quark Number Susceptibilities also crucial for other QGP Signatures : Q, BFluctuations
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 6
![Page 16: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Quark Number Susceptibility
♠ We have argued that
λs =2χs
χu + χd. (2)
(Gavai & Gupta, PR D ’02 )
♠ Quark Number Susceptibilities also crucial for other QGP Signatures : Q, BFluctuations
♠ Finite Density Results by Taylor Expansion in µ
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 6
![Page 17: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Quark Number Susceptibility
♠ We have argued that
λs =2χs
χu + χd. (2)
(Gavai & Gupta, PR D ’02 )
♠ Quark Number Susceptibilities also crucial for other QGP Signatures : Q, BFluctuations
♠ Finite Density Results by Taylor Expansion in µ
♠ Theoretical Checks : Resummed Perturbation expansions, DimensionalReduction..
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 6
![Page 18: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Quark Number Susceptibility
♠ We have argued that
λs =2χs
χu + χd. (2)
(Gavai & Gupta, PR D ’02 )
♠ Quark Number Susceptibilities also crucial for other QGP Signatures : Q, BFluctuations
♠ Finite Density Results by Taylor Expansion in µ
♠ Theoretical Checks : Resummed Perturbation expansions, DimensionalReduction..
♠ Our improvement: Fixed mq/Tc, Continuum limit...
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 6
![Page 19: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Assuming three flavours, u, d, and s quarks, and denoting by µf thecorresponding chemical potentials, the QCD partition function is
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 7
![Page 20: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Assuming three flavours, u, d, and s quarks, and denoting by µf thecorresponding chemical potentials, the QCD partition function is
Z =∫
DU exp(−SG)∏f=u,d,s Det M(mf,µf ) . (3)
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 7
![Page 21: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Assuming three flavours, u, d, and s quarks, and denoting by µf thecorresponding chemical potentials, the QCD partition function is
Z =∫
DU exp(−SG)∏f=u,d,s Det M(mf,µf ) . (3)
Defining µ0 = µu + µd + µs and µ3 = µu − µd, baryon and isospindensity/susceptibilities can be obtained as :(Gottlieb et al. ’87, ’96, ’97, Gavai et al. ’89)
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 7
![Page 22: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Assuming three flavours, u, d, and s quarks, and denoting by µf thecorresponding chemical potentials, the QCD partition function is
Z =∫
DU exp(−SG)∏f=u,d,s Det M(mf,µf ) . (3)
Defining µ0 = µu + µd + µs and µ3 = µu − µd, baryon and isospindensity/susceptibilities can be obtained as :(Gottlieb et al. ’87, ’96, ’97, Gavai et al. ’89)
ni = TV∂ lnZ∂µi
, χij = TV∂2 lnZ∂µi∂µj
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 7
![Page 23: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Assuming three flavours, u, d, and s quarks, and denoting by µf thecorresponding chemical potentials, the QCD partition function is
Z =∫
DU exp(−SG)∏f=u,d,s Det M(mf,µf ) . (3)
Defining µ0 = µu + µd + µs and µ3 = µu − µd, baryon and isospindensity/susceptibilities can be obtained as :(Gottlieb et al. ’87, ’96, ’97, Gavai et al. ’89)
ni = TV∂ lnZ∂µi
, χij = TV∂2 lnZ∂µi∂µj
Higher order susceptibilities are defined by
χfg··· =T
V
∂n logZ∂µf∂µg · · ·
=∂nP
∂µf∂µg · · ·. (4)
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 7
![Page 24: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Assuming three flavours, u, d, and s quarks, and denoting by µf thecorresponding chemical potentials, the QCD partition function is
Z =∫
DU exp(−SG)∏f=u,d,s Det M(mf,µf ) . (3)
Defining µ0 = µu + µd + µs and µ3 = µu − µd, baryon and isospindensity/susceptibilities can be obtained as :(Gottlieb et al. ’87, ’96, ’97, Gavai et al. ’89)
ni = TV∂ lnZ∂µi
, χij = TV∂2 lnZ∂µi∂µj
Higher order susceptibilities are defined by
χfg··· =T
V
∂n logZ∂µf∂µg · · ·
=∂nP
∂µf∂µg · · ·. (4)
These are Taylor coefficients of the pressure P in its expansion in µ.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 7
![Page 25: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
All of these can be written as traces of products of M−1 and various derivatives ofM .
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 8
![Page 26: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
All of these can be written as traces of products of M−1 and various derivatives ofM .
Setting µi = 0, ni =0 but χ are nontrivial. Diagonal χii’s are
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 8
![Page 27: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
All of these can be written as traces of products of M−1 and various derivatives ofM .
Setting µi = 0, ni =0 but χ are nontrivial. Diagonal χii’s are
χ0 =T
2V[〈O2(mu) +
12O11(mu)〉] (5)
χ3 =T
2V〈O2(mu)〉 (6)
χs =T
4V[〈O2(ms) +
14O11(ms)〉] (7)
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 8
![Page 28: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
All of these can be written as traces of products of M−1 and various derivatives ofM .
Setting µi = 0, ni =0 but χ are nontrivial. Diagonal χii’s are
χ0 =T
2V[〈O2(mu) +
12O11(mu)〉] (5)
χ3 =T
2V〈O2(mu)〉 (6)
χs =T
4V[〈O2(ms) +
14O11(ms)〉] (7)
Here O2 = Tr M−1u M ′′u − Tr M−1
u M ′uM−1u M ′u, and O11(mu) = (Tr M−1
u M ′u)2,and the traces are estimated by a stochastic method:Tr A =
∑Nvi=1R
†iARi/2Nv , and (Tr A)2 = 2
∑Li>j=1(Tr A)i(Tr A)j/L(L− 1) ,
where Ri is a complex vector from a set of Nv subdivided in L independent sets.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 8
![Page 29: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Gavai & Gupta PR D ’01; Gavai, Gupta & Majumdar, PR D 2002
χFFT — Ideal gas results for same Lattice.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 9
![Page 30: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Gavai & Gupta PR D ’01; Gavai, Gupta & Majumdar, PR D 2002
χFFT — Ideal gas results for same Lattice.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.9
1
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
χ /χ�
FF
T3
T/Tc
mv
0.1
0.3
0.75
1.03
12 x 4 LatticeN = 2; m /T = 0.1
f s cN = 0; Quenched
f
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 9
![Page 31: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Gavai & Gupta PR D ’01; Gavai, Gupta & Majumdar, PR D 2002
χFFT — Ideal gas results for same Lattice.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.9
1
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
χ /χ�
FF
T3
T/Tc
mv
0.1
0.3
0.75
1.03
12 x 4 LatticeN = 2; m /T = 0.1
f s cN = 0; Quenched
f
Note that PDG values forstrange quark mass =⇒mstrangev /Tc' 0.3-0.7 (Nf=0);
0.45-1.0(Nf=2).
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 9
![Page 32: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Perturbation Theory
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 10
![Page 33: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Perturbation Theory
Weak coupling expansion gives:χ
χFFT= 1− 2(αsπ ) + 8
√(1 + 0.167Nf)(αsπ )
32
(Kapusta 1989).
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 10
![Page 34: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Perturbation Theory
Weak coupling expansion gives:χ
χFFT= 1− 2(αsπ ) + 8
√(1 + 0.167Nf)(αsπ )
32
(Kapusta 1989).
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
1.05
1.1
1.15
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
χ/χ F
FT
αs/π
| || |3Tc 3Tc1.5Tc 1.5Tc
LO Plasmon Nf=0 Plasmon Nf=2 Plasmon Nf=4
♣ Minm 0.981 (0.986) at0.03 (0.02)for Nf = 0 (2).♣ For 1.5 ≤ T/Tc ≤ 3pert. theory −→ 0.99-0.98(1.08=1.03) for Nf = 0 (2).
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 10
![Page 35: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Resummed Perturbation Theory
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 11
![Page 36: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Resummed Perturbation Theory
Hard Thermal Loop & Self-consistent resummation give :(Blaizot, Iancu & Rebhan, PLB ’01; Chakraborty, Mustafa & Thoma, EPJC ’02).
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 11
![Page 37: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Resummed Perturbation Theory
Hard Thermal Loop & Self-consistent resummation give :(Blaizot, Iancu & Rebhan, PLB ’01; Chakraborty, Mustafa & Thoma, EPJC ’02).
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 11
![Page 38: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Resummed Perturbation Theory
Hard Thermal Loop & Self-consistent resummation give :(Blaizot, Iancu & Rebhan, PLB ’01; Chakraborty, Mustafa & Thoma, EPJC ’02).
Our results for Nt = 4 Lattice artifacts ?Check for larger Nt and improved actions.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 11
![Page 39: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
χud
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 12
![Page 40: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
χud
Off-diagonal Susceptibility : χud = 〈 TV Tr M−1u M ′uTr M−1
d M ′d〉
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 12
![Page 41: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
χud
Off-diagonal Susceptibility : χud = 〈 TV Tr M−1u M ′uTr M−1
d M ′d〉
♥ Zero within 1–σ ∼ O(10−6) for T > Tc.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 12
![Page 42: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
χud
Off-diagonal Susceptibility : χud = 〈 TV Tr M−1u M ′uTr M−1
d M ′d〉
♥ Zero within 1–σ ∼ O(10−6) for T > Tc.
♥ Identically zero for Ideal gas but O(α3s) in P.T.
Using the same scale and αs as for χ3 −→ χud ∼ O(10−4) !!
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 12
![Page 43: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
χud
Off-diagonal Susceptibility : χud = 〈 TV Tr M−1u M ′uTr M−1
d M ′d〉
♥ Zero within 1–σ ∼ O(10−6) for T > Tc.
♥ Identically zero for Ideal gas but O(α3s) in P.T.
Using the same scale and αs as for χ3 −→ χud ∼ O(10−4) !!
♥ NONZERO for T < Tc and ∝M−2π .
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 12
![Page 44: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
χud
Off-diagonal Susceptibility : χud = 〈 TV Tr M−1u M ′uTr M−1
d M ′d〉
♥ Zero within 1–σ ∼ O(10−6) for T > Tc.
♥ Identically zero for Ideal gas but O(α3s) in P.T.
Using the same scale and αs as for χ3 −→ χud ∼ O(10−4) !!
♥ NONZERO for T < Tc and ∝M−2π .
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
M /
T c4
ud
�
2χ
π10
5
M /Tcπ
♣ 123 × 4 Lattice; Quenched.♣ T = 0.75Tc♣ Gavai, Gupta & Majumdar,
PR D 2002
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 12
![Page 45: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Taking Continuum Limit
(Gavai & Gupta, PR D ’02 and PR D ’03)
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 13
![Page 46: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Taking Continuum Limit
(Gavai & Gupta, PR D ’02 and PR D ’03)
♠ Investigate larger Nt : 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 13
![Page 47: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Taking Continuum Limit
(Gavai & Gupta, PR D ’02 and PR D ’03)
♠ Investigate larger Nt : 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14.
♠ Naik action : Improved by O(a) compared to Staggered.Introduction of µ nontrivial but straightforward.(Naik, NP B 1989; Gavai, NP B ’03)
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 13
![Page 48: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Taking Continuum Limit
(Gavai & Gupta, PR D ’02 and PR D ’03)
♠ Investigate larger Nt : 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14.
♠ Naik action : Improved by O(a) compared to Staggered.Introduction of µ nontrivial but straightforward.(Naik, NP B 1989; Gavai, NP B ’03)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
2 4 6 8 10 12 14
χ/Τ2
Nt
Aspect ratio 3
naive naik
p4
♠ Does improve theNt-dependence of the freefermions.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 13
![Page 49: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Results at 2Tc :
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07
/T2
χ 3
1/N t2
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 14
![Page 50: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Results at 2Tc :
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07
/T2
χ 3
1/N t2
♦ N−2t ∼ a2 extrapolation works and leads to same results within errors for both
staggered and Naik fermions.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 14
![Page 51: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Results at 2Tc :
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07
/T2
χ 3
1/N t2
♦ N−2t ∼ a2 extrapolation works and leads to same results within errors for both
staggered and Naik fermions.
♦ Milder N−2t ∼ a2-dependence for Naik fermions.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 14
![Page 52: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
The continuum susceptibility vs. T therefore is :
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 15
![Page 53: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
The continuum susceptibility vs. T therefore is :
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1 2 3
χ /Τ
23
T/Tc
NL
HTL
Naik action (Squares) and Staggered action (circles)
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 15
![Page 54: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
The continuum susceptibility vs. T therefore is :
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1 2 3
χ /Τ
23
T/Tc
NL
HTL
Naik action (Squares) and Staggered action (circles)
♥ Also reproduced in dimensional reduction (1 free parameter). Vuorinen, PR D ’03.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 15
![Page 55: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
The continuum susceptibility vs. T therefore is :
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1 2 3
χ /Τ
23
T/Tc
NL
HTL
Naik action (Squares) and Staggered action (circles)
♥ Also reproduced in dimensional reduction (1 free parameter). Vuorinen, PR D ’03.
♥ Note that χud behaves the same way for ALL Nt and both fermions, leading to
the same O(10−6) values in continuum too.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 15
![Page 56: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Wroblewski Parameter
Using our continuum QNS, ratio χs/χu can be obtained.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 16
![Page 57: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Wroblewski Parameter
Using our continuum QNS, ratio χs/χu can be obtained.
m/Tc = 0.03 for u, d and m/Tc = 1 for s quark → λs(T ). Extrapolate to Tc.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 16
![Page 58: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Wroblewski Parameter
Using our continuum QNS, ratio χs/χu can be obtained.
m/Tc = 0.03 for u, d and m/Tc = 1 for s quark → λs(T ). Extrapolate to Tc.
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1λs
AGS Si-Au
AGS Au-Au
SpS Pb-Pb
SpS S-Ag
SpS S-S
RHIC Au-Au
Quenched QCD (T )c
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 16
![Page 59: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Caveats
• Quenched approximation – Expect a shift of 5-10 % in full QCD.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 17
![Page 60: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Caveats
• Quenched approximation – Expect a shift of 5-10 % in full QCD.
• Extrapolation to Tc – Straightforward but better to do it for full QCD
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 17
![Page 61: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Caveats
• Quenched approximation – Expect a shift of 5-10 % in full QCD.
• Extrapolation to Tc – Straightforward but better to do it for full QCD .
• Preliminary results for Full 2-flavour QCD (Gavai & Gupta):
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 17
![Page 62: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Caveats
• Quenched approximation – Expect a shift of 5-10 % in full QCD.
• Extrapolation to Tc – Straightforward but better to do it for full QCD .
• Preliminary results for Full 2-flavour QCD (Gavai & Gupta):
0.38
0.4
0.42
0.44
0.46
0.48
0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1 1.05 1.1
sλ
T/Tc
Nt=4, 2 flavour QCD, mu/Tc=0.1, ms/Tc=1.0
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 17
![Page 63: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Caveats
• Quenched approximation – Expect a shift of 5-10 % in full QCD.
• Extrapolation to Tc – Straightforward but better to do it for full QCD .
• Preliminary results for Full 2-flavour QCD (Gavai & Gupta):
0.38
0.4
0.42
0.44
0.46
0.48
0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1 1.05 1.1
sλ
T/Tc
Nt=4, 2 flavour QCD, mu/Tc=0.1, ms/Tc=1.0
♣ Large finite volumeeffects below Tc♣ Up to 123 Lattices used.♣ Strong dependence onms expected.♣ Large finite a effects.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 17
![Page 64: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
• At SPS and RHIC, µB 6= 0 ; But observed λs is insensitive to it.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 18
![Page 65: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
• At SPS and RHIC, µB 6= 0 ; But observed λs is insensitive to it. .
– Theoretically, Screening mass- Susceptibility correlation and µ-dependenceresults of QCD-TARO on screening masses too suggest such an insensitivity.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 18
![Page 66: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
• At SPS and RHIC, µB 6= 0 ; But observed λs is insensitive to it. .
– Theoretically, Screening mass- Susceptibility correlation and µ-dependenceresults of QCD-TARO on screening masses too suggest such an insensitivity.
– Needs to be checked explicitly.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 18
![Page 67: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
• At SPS and RHIC, µB 6= 0 ; But observed λs is insensitive to it. .
– Theoretically, Screening mass- Susceptibility correlation and µ-dependenceresults of QCD-TARO on screening masses too suggest such an insensitivity.
– Needs to be checked explicitly.
• Assumed : characteristic time scale of plasma are far from the energy scales ofstrange or light quark production.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 18
![Page 68: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
• At SPS and RHIC, µB 6= 0 ; But observed λs is insensitive to it. .
– Theoretically, Screening mass- Susceptibility correlation and µ-dependenceresults of QCD-TARO on screening masses too suggest such an insensitivity.
– Needs to be checked explicitly.
• Assumed : characteristic time scale of plasma are far from the energy scales ofstrange or light quark production.
– Observation of spikes in photon production may falsify this.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 18
![Page 69: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
• At SPS and RHIC, µB 6= 0 ; But observed λs is insensitive to it. .
– Theoretically, Screening mass- Susceptibility correlation and µ-dependenceresults of QCD-TARO on screening masses too suggest such an insensitivity.
– Needs to be checked explicitly.
• Assumed : characteristic time scale of plasma are far from the energy scales ofstrange or light quark production.
– Observation of spikes in photon production may falsify this.
• Assumed : Chemical equilibration in the plasma.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 18
![Page 70: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
EoS for nonzero baryon density
Recall,
χfg··· =T
V
∂n logZ∂µf∂µg · · ·
=∂nP
∂µf∂µg · · ·. (8)
Thus χuuuu involves terms having fourth derivative w. r. to µ while χuudd onlysecond derivatives.
In continuum, f(aµ) = 1 + aµ→ f ′′(0) = 0.On lattice, in general, all derivatives exist and depend on the nature of function :prescription dependence !
Fodor-Katz used fHK and got µE = 725 MeV for Nt = 4. If they were to usefBG, then µE = 692 MeV.
Easy to show that f ′′(0) = 1 always but all higher derivatives depend on choice of
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 19
![Page 71: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
f . Thus, one can write
χuuuu = χHKuuuu + ∆f (3)(χuuT 2
)( 4N2t
), (9)
where ∆f (3) = f (3) − 1 is 2 for fBG.
Prescription dependence must go away for small a or large enough Nt.How large an Nt needed ? Nt ≥ 10, see below.
Defining
µ∗T
=
√12χuu/T 2
|χuuuu|, (10)
and ∆P = P (µ)− P (µ = 0), the Taylor series expansion for Pressure P for 2flavours can be re-organized as,
∆PT 4
=(χuuT 2
)(µT
)2[
1 +(µ/T
µ∗/T
)2
+O(µ4
µ4∗
)]. (11)
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 20
![Page 72: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Note that
• Each term in ∆P is prescription dependent, except the 1st. Physical ∆P maybe best obtained by evaluating each in continuum limit, as we do below. Moreimportant for larger µ.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 21
![Page 73: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Note that
• Each term in ∆P is prescription dependent, except the 1st. Physical ∆P maybe best obtained by evaluating each in continuum limit, as we do below. Moreimportant for larger µ.
• The above is true for all physical quantities.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 21
![Page 74: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Note that
• Each term in ∆P is prescription dependent, except the 1st. Physical ∆P maybe best obtained by evaluating each in continuum limit, as we do below. Moreimportant for larger µ.
• The above is true for all physical quantities.
• µ� µ∗ for prescription independence, provided still higher susceptibilities≤ χuuuu.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 21
![Page 75: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Note that
• Each term in ∆P is prescription dependent, except the 1st. Physical ∆P maybe best obtained by evaluating each in continuum limit, as we do below. Moreimportant for larger µ.
• The above is true for all physical quantities.
• µ� µ∗ for prescription independence, provided still higher susceptibilities≤ χuuuu.
• (TE, µE) may be identified from the radius of convergence using many highersusceptibilities obtained in continuum limit term by term. What about series onfinite lattice and estimate of (TE, µE) as done presently ?
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 21
![Page 76: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Our Results
Our results for χuuuu and ∆P : Gavai and Gupta, PR D68, ’03
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
χ uuu
u
�
T/Tc
Nt = 8 Nt = 10 Nt = 12 Nt = 14
Continuum limitIdeal Gas
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 P
/T
�
4∆
T/T c
0.15
0.44
0.73
1.03
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 22
![Page 77: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Our Results
Our results for χuuuu and ∆P : Gavai and Gupta, PR D68, ’03
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
χ uuu
u
�
T/Tc
Nt = 8 Nt = 10 Nt = 12 Nt = 14
Continuum limitIdeal Gas
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 P
/T
�
4∆
T/T c
0.15
0.44
0.73
1.03
♥ Both reproduced in dimensional reduction (1 free parameter). Vuorinen, PR D68, ’03
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 22
![Page 78: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Our Results
Our results for χuuuu and ∆P : Gavai and Gupta, PR D68, ’03
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
χ uuu
u
�
T/Tc
Nt = 8 Nt = 10 Nt = 12 Nt = 14
Continuum limitIdeal Gas
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 P
/T
�
4∆
T/T c
0.15
0.44
0.73
1.03
♥ Both reproduced in dimensional reduction (1 free parameter). Vuorinen, PR D68, ’03
♥ Our results for P agree with Fodor-Katz (PL B568, ’03) and the recentBielefeld results (PR D68, ’03).
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 22
![Page 79: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Defining µ∗i to extend the definition of µ∗2 (ith term =(i+ 2)th term), the Taylorseries expansion for Pressure ∆P for 2 flavours can be re-organized as,
∆PT 4
=(χuuT 2
)(µT
)2[
1 +(µ
µ∗2
)2[
1 +(µ
µ∗4
)2 [1 + . . .
]]]. (12)
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 23
![Page 80: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Defining µ∗i to extend the definition of µ∗2 (ith term =(i+ 2)th term), the Taylorseries expansion for Pressure ∆P for 2 flavours can be re-organized as,
∆PT 4
=(χuuT 2
)(µT
)2[
1 +(µ
µ∗2
)2[
1 +(µ
µ∗4
)2 [1 + . . .
]]]. (12)
130
140
150
160
170
600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
T
�
µ
6/8 order4/6 order2/4 order
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 23
![Page 81: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
Summary
• Quark number susceptibilities −→ RHIC signal physics.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 24
![Page 82: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Summary
• Quark number susceptibilities −→ RHIC signal physics.
• Continuum limit of χuu and χuuuu obtained in Quenched QCD. Broadly inagreement with BIR resummation and dimensional reduction. Still scope forimprovement in them ?
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 24
![Page 83: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
Summary
• Quark number susceptibilities −→ RHIC signal physics.
• Continuum limit of χuu and χuuuu obtained in Quenched QCD. Broadly inagreement with BIR resummation and dimensional reduction. Still scope forimprovement in them ?
• Continuum limit of χuu yields λs in agreement with RHIC and SPS results afterextrapolation to Tc. First full QCD investigations show encouraging trend.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 24
![Page 84: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
Summary
• Quark number susceptibilities −→ RHIC signal physics.
• Continuum limit of χuu and χuuuu obtained in Quenched QCD. Broadly inagreement with BIR resummation and dimensional reduction. Still scope forimprovement in them ?
• Continuum limit of χuu yields λs in agreement with RHIC and SPS results afterextrapolation to Tc. First full QCD investigations show encouraging trend.
• Pressure for nonzero µ obtained. At both SPS and RHIC, χuu is the majorcontribution.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 24
![Page 85: The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCDneft/gavai.pdf · 2007. 9. 5. · The Wroblewski parameter from lattice QCD Workshop on Field Theories Near Equilibrium Rajiv V. Gavai Introdution](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022071416/61121fcf3798e138ff0aa31e/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
Summary
• Quark number susceptibilities −→ RHIC signal physics.
• Continuum limit of χuu and χuuuu obtained in Quenched QCD. Broadly inagreement with BIR resummation and dimensional reduction. Still scope forimprovement in them ?
• Continuum limit of χuu yields λs in agreement with RHIC and SPS results afterextrapolation to Tc. First full QCD investigations show encouraging trend.
• Pressure for nonzero µ obtained. At both SPS and RHIC, χuu is the majorcontribution.
• Phase diagram in T − µ on small Nt = 4 has begun to emerge: Differentmethods, same (TE, µE). Beware of prescription dependence and lookforward to larger Nt.
NEFT ’03, TIFR, December 18, 2003 R. V. Gavai Top 24