the wavelength dependence of the yule-nielsen factor joseph m. janiak* and dr. jon arney rochester...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
215 views
TRANSCRIPT
The Wavelength Dependence of the Yule-Nielsen Factor
Joseph M. Janiak* and Dr. Jon ArneyRochester Institute of Technology
Optical Dot Gain
• Caused by the lateral scattering of light in a paper substrate.
• Another name for optical dot gain is the Yule-Nielsen effect.
Paper
LightLight Scatters
in Paper
Dot
R = F Ri + (1 - F)Rp
Ri and Rp
are functionsof F.
Paper CrossSection
0.5 10
0.5
0
1
R
Dot Fraction, F
n is the Yule-NielsenDot Gain Parameter
)/1()/1()/1( )1( npo
nio
n RFRFR
Yule-Nielsen Equation
• R = Reflectance of Image
• Fo = Dot Area Fraction
• Ri = Reflectance of ink patch
• Rp = Reflectance of paper
)/1()/1()/1( )1( npo
nio
n RFRFR
What Affects n?
• Optical scattering power of paper
• Halftone pattern
• Sharpness of the edge on dots
• Opacity of the dot
Yule-Nielsen Factor, n
• When n = 1 there is no diffusion or spreading
• The theoretical limit of n is 2
Research Objective
• Five variables were looked at to determine which variable was most important in controlling the wavelength dependence of n.
Paper Substrate(cont.)
• When ink jet paper is used, ink will penetrate the paper less.
• Physical dot gain is reduced when inkjet paper is used.
Opacity(cont.)
• Laser Jet 5TM uses opaque toner.
• Offset printers use transparent ink.
• Scattering within the absorbing layer should be more intense when opaque toner is used.
AM Halftones
• Clustered dot halftone
• Dots are printed at fixed distances from each other.
• Grayscale is controlled by varying size of dots.
FM Halftones
• Error diffused halftone
• Dots are the same size throughout the halftone.
• Grayscale is controlled by varying the distance between the dots.
Experimental Method
• First created series of samples via computer and printer.
• Found sample area where dot area fraction was roughly 50% and took precsise measurement with microdensitometer.
• Found reflectances of 100% dot area region,50% dot area region, and 0% dot area region via spectrophotometer.
Experimental Method(cont.)
• Placed the known values of R,Ri,Rp, and Fo into Yule-Nielsen equation and solved for the value of n.
• Generated plots of n versus wavelength and absorbance spectra of samples.
Results Wavelength vs. n
1
1.25
1.5
1.75
2
400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675 700
Wavelength(nm)
n
Magenta ink - Yellow paper
Magenta ink - White inkjet paper
Magenta ink - White copier paper
Magenta ink - Offset printer
Magenta ink - Clustered dot halftone
Magenta ink - Error diffused halftone
Magenta ink - Blue paper
Wavelength vs. n
1
1.25
1.5
1.75
2
400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675 700
Wavelength(nm)
n
Magenta ink - Yellow paper
Magenta ink - White inkjet paper
Magenta ink - White copier paper
Magenta ink - Offset printer
Magenta ink - Clustered dot halftone
Magenta ink - Error diffused halftone
Magenta ink - Blue paper
- n was larger when electrophotography was used compared to when offset was used.- n was larger when a clustered dot halftone was used.
Results(cont.)
Wavelength vs. Absorbance
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675 700
Wavelength(nm)
Ab
so
rban
ce
Magenta ink - Yellow paper
Magenta ink - White inkjet paper
Magenta ink - White copier paper
Magenta ink - Offset printer
Magenta ink - Clustered dot halftone
Magenta ink - Error diffused halftone
Magenta ink - Blue paper
Results(cont.)Wavelength vs. n
1
1.25
1.5
1.75
2
400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675 700
Wavelength(nm)
n
Magenta ink - Offset printer
Magenta ink - White inkjet paper
Magenta ink - White copier paper
Cyan ink - Offset printer
Cyan ink - White inkjet paper
Cyan ink - White copier paper
Yellow ink - Offset printer
Yellow ink - White inkjet paper
Results(cont.)
Wavelength vs. n
1
1.25
1.5
1.75
2
400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675 700
Wavelength(nm)
n
Magenta ink - Offset printer
Magenta ink - White inkjet paper
Magenta ink - White copier paper
Cyan ink - Offset printer
Cyan ink - White inkjet paper
Cyan ink - White copier paper
Yellow ink - Offset printer
Yellow ink - White inkjet paper
- again n was larger when electrophotography was used compared to when offset was used.
Results(cont.)Wavelength vs. Absorbance
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675 700
Wavelength(nm)
Ab
so
rba
nc
e
Magenta ink - Offset printer
Magenta ink - White inkjet paper
Magenta ink - White copierpaper
Cyan ink - Offset printer
Cyan ink - White inkjet paper
Cyan ink - White copier paper
Yellow ink - Offset printer
Yellow ink - White inkjet paper
Results Summary - Effect on n
• Color of Ink- Proved to be similar to the absorbance spectra. As absorbance increased, n increased. This is different that what has been seen in past research.
• Opacity- When electrophotography was used n values appeared to be larger.
Results Summary - Effect on n
• Halftone-When clustered dot halftones were used(AM halftones) n values were larger, compared to when error diffused halftones were used(FM halftones).
• After the conclusion of this experiment it was seen that the Yule-Nielsen effect was not only a function of scattering but also absorbance.