the vajont slide 1987 engineering geology
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/16/2019 The Vajont Slide 1987 Engineering Geology
1/11
Engineering Geology, 24 (1987) 513--523 513
Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Ams terda m -- Printed in The Netherl ands
Prepared Discussion
T H E V A J O N T S L I D E
L. MULLER-SALZBURG
Paracelsusstrasse 2 , A -5 02 0 Salzbu rg Austria)
(Accepted for publication December 1986)
I n t h i s p l a y h a l l, w e n o w w i l l p l a y t h e s t o r y o f V a j o n t . I w i l l n o t t r e a t o r
d i s c u ss t h e m a n y e x p l a n a t i o n s w h i c h c a m e u p a f t e r t h e d i s a s te r o f V a j o n t .
T h e s e e x p l a n a t i o n s h a v e b e e n p u b l i s h e d ( T a b l e I) a n d d i s c u s s e d a n d a r e q u i t e
w e l l k n o w n t o m a n y o f y o u , b u t l es s k n o w n , I t h in k , is t h e h i s t o ry o f h o w
t h i s d i a s te r , h o w t h i s s l i d e d e v e l o p e d , a n d i t is a f i rs t -c l a ss o p p o r t u n i t y t o
l ea r n h o w t o a v o i d s u c h th i n g s i n t h e f u t u r e b y s t u d y i n g t h i s c a se h i s t o r y ,
i n c lu d i n g : t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f fi n d in g s a n d o f e r ro r s; o f i n t e r p r e t a ti o n s a n d
m i s i n t e r p r e t a t io n s ; a n d o f d e c is i o n s a n d m i s d e c is i o n s. S o I w o u l d r a t h e r
e m p h a s i z e t h e c h r o n o l o g y o f t h e e v e n t s b e f o r e t h e s l id e an d d e a l o n l y b r i e f l y
w i t h w h a t h a s b e e n e x p l a i n e d a f t e r t h e s l id e , b e c a u s e th i s w i ll b e d i s c u s s e d
b y o t h e r s p e a k e r s a l s o . I w i l l p r e s e n t f a c t s a n d f i g u r e s w h i c h a r e c o r r e c t b u t
a r e in s o m e c a se s d i f f e r e n t f r o m f ig u r es w h i c h h a v e b e e n p u b l i s h e d i n t h e
p a s t . A n d I w i ll t a lk a b o u t t h e h i s t o r y o f t h e r e c o g n i t i o n o f t h e d a n g e r , o r
t h e c o n s e q u e n c e s o f a s li de , w h i c h i n f l u e n c e d v e r y m u c h t h e i n t e r p r e t a ti o n s
m a d e a n d t h e d e c i s io n s ta k e n b y t h o s e r e s p o n s ib l e . I w i ll t a lk a b o u t t h e r o l e
o f d e c i s io n s in t h is ca s e m o r e t h a n a b o u t t h e r o le o f a n a l y si s, b e c a u s e i n o r d e r
t o l ea r n f r o m s u c h a m i s ta k e , a n d a ll o f u s k n o w w e o n l y l ea r n f r o m m i s t a k e s,
w e h a v e t o t r y t o u n d e r s t a n d w h a t h a p p e n e d n o t o n l y p h y si c al ly , n o t o n l y
m e c h a n i c a l l y a n d m a t h e m a t i c a l l y , b u t a ls o t o u n d e r s t a n d t h e p a r t i c i p a ti o n
o f h u m a n t h i n k in g . W e h a v e t o u n d e r s t a n d i t i n a r e t r o s p e c t i v e w a y , p u t t i n g
o u r s e lv e s i n t h e p l a c e o f t h o s e e n g i n e e rs a n d g e o l o g is t s i n 1 9 5 0 , 1 9 5 5 , 1 9 6 0 ,
b e f o r e t h e s li d es . O n l y t h e n c a n w e g e t t h e f e e l i n g o f w h a t s h o u l d b e d e v el -
o p e d i n o u r s o u l s t o a v o i d s u c h t h in g s i n t h e f u t u r e .
T h e t a s k is n o t e a s y b e c a u s e i n e a c h n e w c a se a d i f f e r e n t g e o l o g y a n d q u i t e
d i f f e r e n t p r o b l e m s w il l b e e n c o u n t e r e d . O u r k n o w l e d g e h a s i n c re a s e d v e r y
m u c h s in c e V a j o n t , o u r e x p e r i e n c e h a s i n c r ea s e d v e r y m u c h s in c e t h e n , b u t I
t h i n k n o t i n c r e a s e d i n t h e s a m e m a n n e r i s o u r a b i l i t y t o r e a s o n l o g i c a l ly ,
m a k e i n t e r p r e t a t i o n s , a n d t o t a k e d e c i s i o n s . I n f u t u r e c a s es , t h e s i t e i n v e st i-
g a t i o n s t h a t w i ll b e m a d e w i l l b e v e r y m u c h i n c re a s ed , c o m p a r e d w i t h t h e
i n v e s t i g a t io n s m a d e i n t h e p a s t , a n d a ll t h i s w i ll g r e a tl y i n c r e a s e t h e p o s -
s ib i li ti e s fo r a n a l y s is . B u t e a c h c a s e is d i f f e r e n t . W e c a n n o t a p p l y t h e e x p e r i -
e n c e f r o m o n e c a se t o a n o t h e r w i t h o u t h a v in g a n a ly s e d t h e f a c t o r s w h i c h
* Oral presentation.
0013 -795 2/8 7/$ 03.5 0 © 1987 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
-
8/16/2019 The Vajont Slide 1987 Engineering Geology
2/11
5 1 4
T A B L E I
E x p l a n a t i o n a f t e r t h e c a t a s t r o p h e
I Explanations
(A) con cern ing causes o f th e s lide
(Kenney , 1965 ; Kie r sch , 1964 ; Gruner , 1965 ; Skempton , 1966 ; Mi i l l e r , 1968)
(B) concern ing mechan ics o f the s l ide
(Miil ler , 19 64; Weif~, 1964 ; Jaege r , 1965; N onvei l ler , 1965 ; Mencl, 1 966 ; Sk em pto n,
1966; Broi l i , 1967; Haefel i , 1967; Kenney, 1967; Mii l ler , 1968)
(C) concern ing fa i lu re su r face
(Kiersch , 19 64; Sell i e t a l . , 1964; M uller , 1964 ; Sel l i -Trevisan, 1964; Weif~, 1964;
C a m b e f o r t , 1 9 6 5 ; Mi lli, 1 9 6 6 ; Me n c l, 1 9 6 6 ; S k e m p t o n , 1 9 6 6 ; V e n z o u . F u g a ti 1
Sem enz a, 1966 ; M ill i, 1967 ; Broi l i , 1967 ; Mii ller , 196 8)
(D) concern ing f r i c t ion va lues
(Nonve i l l e r , 1965 ; Menc l, 1966 ; Ske m pton , 1966 ; Nonve i l l e r , 1967 ; K enn ey , 1967 ;
Malina , 1968; Mii l ler , 1968)
( E ) d y n a m i c a p p r o a c h
(H aefel i , 1967 ; No nvei l ler , 196 7 ; Jaeg er , 19 68 ; Ren gers and Mii ller, 197 0; Scheidegg er ,
1 9 6 4 , 1 9 7 3 ; Ko r n e r , 1 9 6 4 , 1 9 7 6 ; C h o wd h u r y , 1 9 7 8 )
II Not attemp ted to explain
mechan ism tha t in i t i a t ed the s l ide
- - b a c k g r o u n d o f t h e d e c i s i o n - ma k i n g p ro c e s s
lapses in log ical r eason ing
mul t i - l aye red p rocesses invo lved
inab i l i ty to r econc i l e the va r ious p remises wi th a l l the obse rved fac t s
b a s i ca l ly i n f lu e n c e d t h e f i r st c as e ; o n l y t h e n m a y w e t r a n s f e r o u r e x p e r i e n c e
t o o t h e r s i t u a ti o n s . T o d a y w e a r e m u c h m o r e c le v er , m u c h m o r e e d u c a t e d a n d
t r a i n e d , b u t w e a r e n o t w i s e r. T h e r e i s a c e r t a i n p o s t - f a i l u r e c u r v e , a p l o t
v e rs u s t i m e o f o u r k n o w l e d g e , o u r j u d g m e n t , b u t a l s o o u r c o n f u s i o n . S o m e
y e a r s a f t e r su c h a fa i lu r e o u r k n o w l e d g e i n c re a s e s v e ry m u c h , b u t o u r a b i l i t y
t o r e a s o n a n d t a k e d e c i s i o n s d e c r e a s e s a f t e r a c e r t a i n t i m e . T h i s is m y
e x p e r i e n c e .
B A C K G R O U N D
O n f ig .5 o f m y p a p e r ( p . 4 3 3 ) y o u c o u l d s e e t h e t e r r i t o r y a f t e r t h e s l id e .
T h e V a j o n t r iv e r is c o v e r e d b y t h e h u g e s li d i ng m a s s , m e a s u r i n g a b o u t 1 7 0 0 m
in l e n g t h a n d a b o u t 1 k m in w i d t h . T h e t e r r i t o r y w i t h i n w h i c h t h e s l id e
o c c u r r e d , w a s m o r e o r l es s a p l a in , c a l l ed t h e " P o z z a " a n d t h e " P i a n d e l T o c " .
T h i s t e r r i t o r y s h i f t e d a b o u t 2 6 0 - - 4 0 0 m t o w a r d t h e r i g h t b a n k . T h e f i g u re
m e n t i o n e d b e f o r e s h o w s t h e p a r t o f t h e s l i d i n g p l a n e w h i c h is v i s ib le n o w a f t e r
t h e s l i de , b u t w h i c h n o b o d y f o r e s a w b e f o r e . T h e s l id in g m a s s r e m a i n e d
t o g e t h e r , v e r y m u c h l ik e o n e b l o c k . S o m e z o n e s s h o w e d t h a t d e t r i t u s s a n k
i n t o t h e g o r g e . I t m e a n s t h e s l id i n g m a s s j u m p e d o v e r t h e g o r g e l e a v in g t h e
g o r g e e m p t y , a n d o n l y l a t e r o n t h r o u g h t h e s e c o n e s t h e g o r g e w a s f il le d .
T h e d a m r e s is t ed t h e o v e r l o a d w i t h v e r y li t t le d a m a g e . O n l y t h e c r e s t o f
-
8/16/2019 The Vajont Slide 1987 Engineering Geology
3/11
515
the dam was slightly damaged , nothi ng else. Along the zone of th e sliding
mass the sliding surface was more or less horizontal.
Some weeks before the major slide to ok place, deta chme nt o f rocks
occurred a nd ind icated the mov eme nt was in the mass. For instance, a small
part of the rock came down some metres, later on it came down even more,
and farth er east abou t 700,000 m 3 of rock slid down . At this time the whole
mass was not motionless but, according to the measurements, showed very
little movement . Some weeks after this, when the lake was already filled to
abo ut half the elevation of the dam, which is 276 m high, a major slide
occurred and together with this on this plain of the Pian del Toc, a lot of
vertical or sub-vertical cracks, heavy cracks, could be observed. From this we
could see there w ould be a major slide, not a small one. The mai n event was
this sliding mass droppin g into the reservoir, and pushing the wat er very
mu ch in the vertical sense, but also laterally. The max imum height of the
wave came up to the village of Casso where some houses were destroyed,
260 m above lake level. The water came in throug h the roofs to th e people
laying in bed and they disappeared immediately. From there the water fell
over the gorge. The tunnels of the Vajont road were filled by gravel and stone
for some 100 metres and the wave pushed down through the main valley of
the Piave river against the small city of Longarone with a popul ation of ab out
10,000. Only a few houses remain there; noth ing fro m the church, no rail-
way, no roads, nothi ng, everything was washed away. Fo ur ot her smaller
villages were also washed away.
On the abut ment of the dam, which was subjected to a load eight times
greater tha n tha t for which it was designed, only two or three cracks occurred.
The rock mass remained in quite good condition thanks t o t he tyi ng together
of the rock b y some 150 roc k anchors, 50 metres long, and being prestressed
elastically, the reinfor cement could keep the rock tog ether after the shock.
Regarding the structure of the rock, horizontal layers of the Upper
Cretaceous limestone have been cut by a lot of vertical joints -- I may call it
faults -- and the layers started curving at the back, going parallel to the later
sliding surface. From such pictures, the mechanism of the slide has been very
early tho ugh t out. Before shear movement occurred at the bo tto m, tilting
prod uced clearly visible specks on the surface. Anoth er thing was the orienta-
tion o f the sliding path. There was an un dula tio n o f the layers in the direction
of the slide. According to this und ulat ion I could answer the question : when
the slide will occur wou ld it touc h th e da m or not ? and I said the slide will
leave 50 metre s bet ween the sliding mass and the dam. This could be predicted
by th e st ructure because the slide had to follow this structure in lanes.
Please consider the amou nt of energy involved in this slide. Twenty-five
million cubic metres of water spilled over the crest and dro pped abou t 500
metres. It means an energy of about 170 billions of kilowatt hours.
Now, let us consider why the Vajont slide became so catastrophic. We
could ask what have been the causes, because in such catastrophic events
never is there onl y one cause. There are always some causes playing together .
Of course, the slide came down on t he reservoir, but below th e reservoir
-
8/16/2019 The Vajont Slide 1987 Engineering Geology
4/11
516
there was a relatively dense population. Without this dense popul ation t he
event would not have been so catastrophic. The reservoir level at the time of
the major slide was relatively high, only 30 metres were left in freeboard, so
the main volume had t o go over the dam. The velocit y of the slide was very
high and this high velocity was unexpec ted. This is one of th e main reasons
why the slide became catastrophic. The height o f the wave, measuring in its
max imu m to 260 metres, was beyond exp ectation. The expect ation was 26
metres. Except these two deta chmen ts some weeks before the major slide,
there were no warning indications, no na tura l ones, not even artificial ones,
which were pro duce d at this time. Some facts and figures on the slide are
given in Table II.
CHRONOLOGY
There are some important figures with regard to time that are very instruc-
tive. The first time I suspected tha t a slide would occur was 4% years before
the catastroph e. Evidence tha t the slide would be a big one, i.e. having a
volume of more than 200 million cubic meters, was produced nearly 3 years
before the failure. Observation of measuring points, starting with 8 points
and finally 23 benchmarks, was executed and evaluated for more th an three
years. It should be kept in mind tha t dur ing the period of first filling of the
reservoir to half of its anticipated de pth, t he slope behaved regularly; meaning,
according to expect ation . The rising water level was expected to increase the
rate at which the benchmarks would move. With lowering water levels we
expected not a sudden stop but a gradual slowing down of the movement.
During the second filling period t he sliding mass behaved c ompl etel y differ-
ently . As the level of the reservoir was raised, no m ovement ,
n o m o v e m e n t a t
a l l ,
to ok place until the reservoir had risen more than 50 metres above the
elevation where a small slide had occurred during first filling. Only then did
the sliding mass start moving, but at much slower rate than the first time. In
the thi rd filling period , t he slide behaved nearly regularly again. We will come
back to this; it is an important fact.
Please take into account that the dam was started to be built at 1957. My
appo intm ent had not hing to do with the slides in this time. My job was the
foundat ion of the dam and the reinforcement of the abutment. The first
time I suspected that a slide was occurring was about April or May 1959
when the dam was already built to more than half elevation. The famous
dam builder, Carlo Semenza, with w hom I discussed the fou ndat ion problems
and the need for rock reinforcement of the abutments, between the end of
the discussion and the time m y train was leaving asked me, "di d yo u already
know our beautiful reservoir?" I said, "no, I would like to see it". So he
too k me aroun d the reservoir and at a point about 1 km upstream of the
dam o n the right abut ment , we stopped to look against the left abutment .
Immedi ately I asked him, "Ho w m any cubic metres of slides do y ou expe ct?"
He was very shocked. He said, "We do not expect a slide because we have
been p romised by geologists, we have been promised by sliding experts, and
-
8/16/2019 The Vajont Slide 1987 Engineering Geology
5/11
5 1 7
T A B L E I I
F a c t s a n d f i g u r e s
V o l u m e o f s l i d e m a s s
v o l u m e o f r e s e rv o i r
f r e e b o a r d
v o l u m e o f r es e r v o i r a t t h e t i m e o f c a t a s t r o p h e
v o l u m e a t f lo o d o v e r th e d a m
H e i g h t o f a r c h d a m
d i f f e r e n c e i n h e i g h t b e t w e e n r e s e r v o i r le v e l
a n d m a i n v a l le y
E x t e n t o f s li d e
t h i c k n e s s o f s l i d e m a s s
h o r i z o n t a l d i s p l a c e m e n t , a v e ra g e
m a x i m u m v e l o c i t y
H e i g h t o f w a v e
F i r s t s u s p e c t e d s l id e i n r e s e rv o i r
e v i d e n c e t h a t a m a j o r s l i de w o u l d o c c u r
S u r v e y r e f e r e n c e p o i n t s i n s t a l l e d
2 7 5 m i l l i o n m s
1 6 9 m i l l i o n m 3
1 3 m
a b o u t 1 1 5 m i l l i o n m 3
2 5 m i l l i o n m 3
2 7 6 m
5 0 0 m
1 7 0 0 m × 1 0 0 0 m
a b o u t 1 3 0 to a b o u t 3 5 0 m
a b o u t 2 4 0 m
2 5 m / s
2 6 0 m
A p r i l , 1 9 5 9
J u n e , 1 9 6 0
M a y , 1 9 6 0
R e g u l a r b e h a v i o u r d u r i n g f i rs t f i ll in g p e ri o d . P a r a d o x i c a l b e h a v i o u r d u r i n g s e c o n d f i ll in g
p e r i o d . N e a r l y r e g u l a r b e h a v i o u r d u r i n g t h i r d p e r i o d .
b y o t h e r s , t h e r e w i l l b e n o s li d e s" . I s a id , " I d o n ' t w a n t t o i n t e r fe r e w i t h
o t h e r e x p e r t s b e c a u s e i t is n o t m y j o b , b u t p l e a s e I w o u l d s u g ge s t a n
i n v e s t i g a t i o n " .
S e m e n z a i m m e d i a t e l y s t a r te d i n v es ti g a ti o n s. H i s s o n , a n d o t h e r s , w e r e
i n v o lv e d . B o r i ng s w e r e m a d e f o r n e a r l y o n e y e a r . T h e r e p o r t o n t h e i nv e st i-
g a t i o n s w a s m a d e i n J u n e o f 1 9 6 0 , s h o r t l y b e f o r e t h i s sm a l l s li de o f 7 0 0 , 0 0 0
c u b i c m e t e r s o c c u r r e d . A t t h is t im e , t h e o u t l i n e o f t h e m a j o r s l id e m e a s u r in g
1 .7 k m b y 1 k m b e c a m e ap p a r e n t . T h e r e p o r t p o i n t e d o u t t h a t t h e w h o l e m a ss
b e l o w P i a n d e l T o c c o u l d s l id e a n d , f u r t h e r m o r e , i t p o i n t e d o u t t h a t t h e s l id e
c o u l d b e c a u s e d b y r e s e r v o i r fi ll in g . T h i s w a s t h r e e y e a r s b e f o r e t h e c a t a -
s t r o p h i c s li d e t o o k p l ac e
A s e c o n d g e o l o g ic a l r e p o r t w a s g iv e n b y P r o f . D a l P ia z a t t h e e n d o f J u l y
1 9 6 0 i n w h i c h h e s ai d t h e r e w o u l d b e n o m a j o r s li d es , o n l y s u p e r fi c ia l o n e s .
T h e n , a n e x p l o r a t i o n a d i t w a s m a d e i n t h e h i g h e r p a r t o f t h e s li d e a n d p i e z o m -
e t e r s w e r e i n st a l le d . M y r e p o r t , m y o n l y r e p o r t o n t h e s li d es d u r i n g t h i s
p e r i o d o f e n g a g e m e n t , w a s g iv e n a b o u t t h e e n d o f M a r c h 1 9 6 1 . A f t e r t h is I
w a s n e v e r c a ll e d a n y m o r e .
I f w e l o o k o n c e m o r e a t t h e t i m e t a b l e , c o n s id e r t h a t i n 1 9 5 7 d a m c o n -
s t r u c t i o n w a s s t a r t e d ; i n 1 9 6 0 t h e d a m w a s f i n i s h e d , b e f o r e f i r s t f i l l i n g ; i n
1 9 6 1 , t h e M a l p as s e t f a il u re o c c u r r e d . I n 1 9 6 1 , a f t e r M a l p a ss e t, I r e m e m b e r
t a lk i n g w i t h t h e d a m d e s ig n e r , C a rl o S e m e n z a i n M e x i c o . W e w e n t t o s o m e
d a m s i n M e x i c o w h i c h h e h a d d e s i g n e d , a n d h e l o o k e d l i k e an il l m a n , a n d
q u i t e t i r e d . B e c a u s e m y r e l a t i o n t o h i m w a s l ik e f a t h e r a n d s o n I a s k e d ,
-
8/16/2019 The Vajont Slide 1987 Engineering Geology
6/11
518
"Wha t is wrong wit h y ou ?" He answered, " I have the illness of Malpasset".
He was so depressed abou t this event, as he said, I have built ma ny, m any
dams bu t never before did I recognize how big is the responsibility of a dam
designer. Consider, also, that only in 1962 the International Society of Rock
Mechanics is founded, and in 1965 the first finite-element computation was
adapted to rock discontinuities.
EXPECTATION OF DANGER
If we want to learn somethin g from this event, it is necessary to examin e
how the expectation of danger developed. My first guess in 1959 to Semenza
was at least 20 millions, but I was not sure if I should say 20 or I should say
70. As I did not want to shock him too much in the first moments, I said
between 20 and 70 millions. The first small detachment in 1960 made those
responsible inclined to believe my predicti on, against the pred iction of
geologists, of soil mechanists, and of seismologists. A seismic investigation
was made by Prof. Caloi with the result that 10 to 20 meters below the
surface the rock mass was loosened but below 20 meters it was very strong
rock. No indications of slides. Then, the superficial detachment occurred,
but still, nobody except Eduardo Semenza saw it at this time in terms of a
prehistoric slide or some foregoing big event. A fter the tho ro ugh investigation
of Giudici and Semenza, which I could influ ence in the first weeks, came the
result tha t probabl y 200 million cubic meters woul d be involved in this slide
and later on a fter some discussion with Giudici and Semenza we came to a
figure of 250 million cubic meters: of this I was convinced, Giudici and
Semenza and Broili were convinced, but n ob od y want ed to believe it because
famo us experts said it was a foolish idea. Lat er on when t he larger slides
to ok place the meani ng changed. Fro m this time on everybod y was convinced,
everybody, except the experts. Everyb ody on site, Semenza, and all the other
very good engineers working on site, they were convinced the slide would
occur. In my report which I gave at this time, Febr uary or March of 1961, I
expressed the opinion that there will be no way to prevent the slide. This
probabl y was the reason why I was not called any more. It was quite impossible
to turn away the precipitation water. At that time nob ody would take the
responsibility to make a drainage tunn el, which was the only wa y at least to
reduce t he velocity of the slide, maybe to stop it. As the whole mass was
already broken and divided into many faults and many joints, and was really
damaged , no bo dy would have taken the responsibility to start a 2~/~ km long
tunnel and from this tunnel to make some form of drain screens. This was
not considered to be feasible at the time. Anot her seismic survey was made
with the result that the loosened rock was not 10--20 m but 350 m thick. So
it became the general conviction that the slide could not be prevented.
As all the thou ghts were going in this direction, the question now became:
how can we bring down the slide before filling the reservoir? The sliding
mass was moving. This was know n. N ob od y could d ou bt it, it was measured.
The volume of about 200,000,000 cubic meter was known. It was not really
-
8/16/2019 The Vajont Slide 1987 Engineering Geology
7/11
519
i g n o r e d , b u t i t w a s d o u b t e d b y s o m e e x p e r t s . B y t h e n , a s I h a d w r i t t e n , n o
c o u n t e r m e a s u r e s w e r e p o s s i b l e b e c a u s e i t w a s t o o l a te t o c a r r y o u t d r a i n a g e
m e a s u r es . T h e m a s s w o u l d c o m e d o w n , i t w a s k n o w n t o e v e r y b o d y . T h e r e
w e r e t h e i n v e s t i g a ti o n s o f G i u d ic i a n d S e m e n z a , w h i c h s h o w e d a h i gh p r o b -
a b i l it y o f a p r e h i s to r i c s li de , a n d I w o u l d s a y t h e e v i d e n c e t h e y s h o w e d w a s
c o n v in c i n g . I t w a s a b s o l u t e l y c o n v i n c i n g b e c a u s e s o m e r o c k o n t h e r ig h t
a b u t m e n t , w h i c h w a s q u i t e d if f e r en t f r o m t h e s u r r o u n d i n g r o c k o f t h e r ig h t
a b u t m e n t , c o r r e s p o n d e d e x a c t l y t o t h e l ef t a b u t m e n t a n d b e y G n d t h is ro c k
t h e r e w a s s o m e g r a v e l a n d s o m e s o i l . I t w a s c l e a r t h a t t h e r e w a s a p r e h i s t o r i c
s li de . T h i s w a s a c c e p t e d b y m a n y p e r s o n s , b u t i t w a s m a i n l y i g n o r e d b y t h e
e x p e r t s . E v e n i n t h e l a s t g e o l o g i c r e p o r t i t w a s d e n i e d . T h e s li d in g p a t h w a s
a c c e p t e d t o b e k n o w n . L a t e r t h e r e w e r e m a n y d i s c us s i o n s o n t h e s h ap e o f
t h e s li di ng m a s s, b u t g e n e r a ll y it w a s k n o w n t o b e r a th e r d e e p a n d m o r e o r
l es s h o r i z o n t a l i n t h e l o w e r p a r t . B u t e v e n s o , i t w a s n o t f u l l y a c c e p t e d t h a t
t h e s l id in g su r f a c e w o u l d b e a t a d e p t h o f m o r e t h a n 1 5 0 m .
PROGRESSIVE FAILURE
T h e p o s s i b i l i t y t h a t a p r o g r e s s iv e f a il u r e c o u l d b e i n v o l v e d w a s n o t r e c o g -
n i ze d . I n 1 9 5 9 a n d 1 9 6 0 , o n l y a sm a ll n u m b e r o f p e o p l e t h o u g h t i n t e r m s o f
p r o g r e s s i v e f a il u r e s. A t V a j o n t i t w a s n o t r e c o g n i z e d t h a t c h a n g e s i n sh e a r
s t r e n g th c o u l d o c c u r w i t h t i m e , n o r w a s i t r e c o g n i z e d t h a t t h e s h e a r r es i st a n ce
c o u l d b e m o b i l i z e d i n s o m e p a r t s o f t h e s l id e b u t n o t i n o th e r s . T h e g r o u n d -
w a t e r t a b l e w a s m e a s u r e d , b u t i t s i n f l u e n c e o n t h e m e c h a n i c s o f t h e s li de w a s
i g n o r e d b y a ll p e r s o n s. T h e p o s s i b i li t y o f a r te s ia n w a t e r w a s n o t k n o w n . T h e
v e l o c it y , an d t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f th e v e l o c i t y t o b e e x p e c t e d , w a s u n k n o w n .
T h e m e c h a n i sm o f t h e s li de w e c o u l d s a y w a s k n o w n r o u g h l y , b u t u n k n o w n
o r u n k n o w a b l e w a s t h e p o i n t in t im e a t w h i c h t h e s li de w o u l d o c c u r . A n d
t h e e x i s t e n c e o f in i t ia l s tr e s se s , w h i c h p l a y s a c e r t a i n r o l e a c c o r d i n g t o m y
c o n v i c t i o n , w a s n o t d i s c u ss e d a t th e t i m e o f V a j o n t .
EXPLORATIONS
W h a t w a s d o n e f o r t h e e x p l o r a t i o n o f g e o lo g i c a n d r o c k m e c h a n i c a l c o n d i -
t i o n s ? D e t a i le d g e o l o g i c e x p l o r a t i o n w a s d o n e b e f o r e a n d a f t e r th e b i g sl id e .
A v e r y g o o d s t r u c t u r a l a n a l y s is m e a s u r i n g a l l t h e j o i n t s a n d t h e f a u l t s w a s
d o n e ; e x p l o r a t o r y d r il li ng s an d p i e z o m e t e r b o r e h o l e s w e r e m a d e ; a n d t w o
s e is m i c s u rv e y s an d a g e o d e t i c s u r v e y o f l ev e li ng w i t h a n a c c u r a c y o f a b o u t 2
t o 2 1~ c m w a s ca r r ie d o u t . N o m e a s u r e m e n t s w e r e m a d e t o i n d i c a t e h o w
d e e p t h e s li d in g s u r f a c e r e a l l y w a s . N o s l o p e i n d i c a t o r w a s u s e d a t th i s t i m e ,
n o e x t e n s o m e t e r s t o m e a s u r e d i s p l a c e m e n t s d i r e c t ly , o r e v e n r o c k t a l k
i n s t r u m e n t s , o r g e o p h o n e s , f o r w a r n in g .
N o w , t h e g e o l o g i c k n o w l e d g e , o r a s s u m p t i o n s , h a d a n in f l u e n c e . T h e
l i t h o l o g y , i f t h e r e w e r e c l a y l a y e r s {o r c l a y in t e r c a l a t i o n s , o r c l a y s e a m s ) o n
t h e s i l t ed jo i n t s w a s d i sc u s se d b u t n o b o d y c a m e t o a d i s ti n c t o p i n i o n o n h o w
t h i s i n f l u e n c e d t h e s h e a r a n d f r i c t i o n a l r e s i s t a n c e a n d t h e o v e r - a l l b e h a v i o u r
-
8/16/2019 The Vajont Slide 1987 Engineering Geology
8/11
-
8/16/2019 The Vajont Slide 1987 Engineering Geology
9/11
521
TABLE III
Limitations of calculations in avoiding the catastrophic event
The slope was unstable since it was detec ted in 1960
Static stability analyses were tried in order to check the possibility of countermeasure;
any result could be obtained depending on assumptions
The paradoxical behaviour of slide during 2nd filling could not be explained by calcula-
tion at the time
Creep calculations were impossible at the time; no prediction of movements on a time
scale was possible
Progressive failure could not be considered because of unknown properties of the sliding
mass
of the paradoxical behaviour of the slide could not be explained by the
calculations, which were don e b y th e owner. This is very sad to say because
it was obvious that refined calculation was not possible at that time.
THE ROLE OF DECISIONS
A main decision was to store the reservoir at a certain freeboa rd below t he
crest. As I was tol d ma ny time s by dif fer ent persons, this was considered a
small risk because the wave would no t be higher tha n 26 metres, according
to large-scale mode l tests. A "con soli dat ion hy pot hes is" was accepted by all
the experts. It means that a part o f the rock which came under water is more
consolidated than it was before. This is true for many t ypes of soil but is not
true for rock. It is wrong in principle. It was quite a decision to rely on this
hypothesis because there was a fou rth opinion which opposed it. There was
the decision to follow a set storage program, despite the f act that the hyp oth -
esis did no t hold tru e durin g the thi rd filling. Then there was the decision
to favou r a diversion tun nel instead of bringing down the slide progressively,
although the diversion tunn el allowed only a small variation of the water
table. I suggested in my report of 1961 to vary the water table in a manner
which w ould bring the sliding mass dow n piece by piece at low wa ter levels
and to create at least a certain resistance at the toe. This was tried only to a
small exte nt; instead it was decided to have a diversion tunn el.
C O N S I D E R A T I O N S T O A V O I D T H E C A T A S T R O P H E
It is very interesting to examine th e circumstances unde r which the slide
would no t have resulted in a catastrop he. These circumstances are summarized
in Table IV. The items are self-explanatory. I will not at te mp t to relate the
many, ma ny explanations given after the slide o cc ur r ed .. , all very good
explanations but, un fortuna tely, they do not conform with one another,
which shows the co mplex ity of the system. An explanation of the mechanism
which
initiated
the slide has not ye t been att emp ted . The decisions, the lapses
in logical reasoning, the one
-
8/16/2019 The Vajont Slide 1987 Engineering Geology
10/11
5 2 2
T A B L E I V
U n d e r w h a t c i r c u m s t a n c e s w o u l d t h e s l i de n o t h a v e r e s u l te d i n a c a t a s t r o p h e ?
--
i f t h e sl i di n g e l oc i t y c o u l d hav e b e e n p r e d i c t e d
- - if mo r e f r e e b o ar d h ad b e e n l ef t
if m o d e l e x p e r i m e n t s h a d i nd i cat ed t h e d r ast ic w a v e h e i g ht t ha t w o u l d d e v e l o p
if an early stage extensive drainage was pe rf or me d
- - if mo r e t o e r esistanc e had b e e n c r eat e d b y ear l y c o nt r ol l e d m o v e me n t s
if w a r n i n g s y s t e m s h a d b e e n d e v e l o p e d [ ]
- - if d e ci si o ns had n o t b e e n base d o n t h e c o nso l i d at i o n h y p o t h e sis o n l y
if decisions ha d no t be en ma d e so difficult y differences in expertise of the ma n y
advisors involved
- - if e x p e r t s had n o t i n it ial ly r o mise d t h e r e w o u l d b e n o maj o r sl i de
-- if the project reservoir level er e re du ce d
both, the inability to draw conclusions when many factors are influencing
one an other . These are the principal reasons the slide was so catastrophic .
C O N C L U D I N G R E M A R K S
After the disaster of Vajont, many people were saying, and writing, that it
would have been easy to avoid this catastrophe . Ot her people were saying
that it was an unavoidable misfortune, "un cas de force majeure". For me,
bot h meanings are wrong The disaster was the result of human error, in this
case defin itel y of scientific error, and a consequence of lack of knowledge.
R E F E R E N C E S
B ro il i L . 1 9 6 7 . N e w k n o w l e d g e s o n t h e g e o m o r p h o l o g y o f t h e Va j o n t s li d e sl ip su r fac e.
R o c k M e c h . En g . G eo l . V : 3 8 - - 8 8 .
Cambe fo rt H. 19 65. Gli ssemen t de terrain. Sols-Soils 5/IV.
C h o w d h u r y R. 1 9 7 8 . A n al y s is o f t h e Va j o n t sl id e - n e w a p p r o a c h . R o c k M e c h . 1 1 :
29--38.
Gruner, E., 1965. Prozesse um Seeausbriiehe. Schwz. Bzt. f. Verm. Wes., 63 4): 100.
Haefeli, R., 1967. Zum progressiven Bruch in Schnee, Boden, Fels und Eis. Rock Mech.
Eng. Geol., V: 117--137.
Jaeger, Ch., 1965. The Va]ont rock slide. Water Power, March/April.
Jaeger, Ch., 1968. Discontinuouscreep of masses. Water Power, pp.197--198.
Kenney, T.C., 1965. Causes of the Va]ont reservoir disaster. Civ. Eng. -- ASCE.
Kenney, T.C., 1967. Stability of the Vajont valley slope. Rock Mech. Eng. Geol., V 2):
10--16.
Kiersch, G.A., 1964. Vajont reservoir disaster. Cir. Eng. ASCE, pp.32--40.
Kbrner, H., 1964. Schnee-und Eismechanikund einige ihrer Beziehungenzur Geologie.
Rock Mech. Eng. Geol., II: 45--67.
K6rner, H., 1976. Reichweite und Geschwindigkeityon Bergstiirzen und Flie~schnee-
lawinen. Rock Mech., pp.225--256.
Mencl, V., 1966. The influence of the stiffness of a slidingmass on the stability of slopes.
Rock Mech. Eng. Geol., IV: 127--131.
-
8/16/2019 The Vajont Slide 1987 Engineering Geology
11/11
523
Milli, 1966. Sondaggi geognostici sulla frana del Monte Toc. Rel. Tecn. 18.4.1966 (not
publ. ).
Milli, 1967. Sondaggi geognostici sulla frana del Monte Toc. Rel. Tecn. 15.3.1967.
Miiller, L., 1964. Therock slide in the Vajont Valley. Roc Mech. Eng. Geol., II: 148--212.
Miiller, L., 1968. New considerations on the Vajont slide. Rock Mech. Eng. Geol., VI:
1--91.
Miiller, L. and Malina, H., 1968. Schubspannungsverteilung im Progressiven Bruch. Rock
Mech. Eng. Geol., VI: 216--224.
Nonveilter, E., 1965. The stability analysis of slopes with slip surface of general shape.
Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Soil Mech. Found. Eng., Montreal, Vol. II, Div. 6, Toronto.
Nonveiller, E., 1967. Zur Frage der Felarutschung im Vajont-Tal. Rock Mech. Eng. Geol.,
V(1): 1--9.
Rengers, N. and Miiller-Salzburg, L., 1970. Kinematische Versuche an geomechanischen
Modellen. Rock Mech., Suppl. 1, pp.20--31.
Selli, R. and Trevisan, L., 1964. Studio geologico della frana del Vaiont. Allegato alla
relazione della Commissione d'inchiesta sulla sciagura del Vaiont. Genn., 1964.
Semenza, E., 1966. Sintesi degli studi geologici sulla frana del Vajont dal 1959 al 1964.
Memorie del Museo Tridentiono di Scienze Naturali, A. XXIX--XXX, Vol. XVI,
Fasc. I, 1966--67.
Skempton, A.W., 1966. Bedding-Plane-Slip, Residual Strength and the Vajont Landslide.
Corr. Inst. Civil Engineers.
Scheidegger, A.E., 1964. Tektonische Spannungen und deren Einflu~ auf geologische
Verschiebungen. Rock Mech. Eng. Geol., II: 100--105.
Scheidegger, A.E., 1973. On the prediction of the reach and velocity of catastrophic land-
slides. Rock Mech., V: 231.
WeirS, E.H., 1964. Vajont -- Geologische Betrachtungen zur Felsgleitung in den Stausee.
Steir. Beitr. Hydrogeol., H. 15/16, Graz.