the type 21 u-boat boat~, · 2 the engineer the type 41. 21 " u-boat (by ou1· naval...

4
2 THE ENGINEER The Type 41. 21 " U- Boat ( By Ou1 · Naval Correspondent ) No. I I T is perhaps inevita bl e that a nation in which of battorie1:1 . Then why n ot have mor e everything has boon for long koyed t o a ba tt eries 1 single a im and a single arm, should be ablo to It is all delightfully simpl o, and yet a corn- produce something better in this bination of these inno vati ons has produ ce d cat egory th an the expert s of a nation in an underwater cra ft which is, quite lit orally, which research, design, and construction revolutionary in many points of design a nd have ne cossarily been sp read over a. wide of performance. fi e ld .. The contrast be twoe n Germany and Th e writor rece ntly had the opportunit y Great Britain is one of highly specialised of spending several hours in makin g a det ailed effort on th e one hand, as against a pot entia l exam inat ion of on e of the t ype" 21 "U- b oats . which has had to be used sparingly in ce rtain This was th e latest ocea n- going form (apart fie lds in order that there should bo enough from experimental craft ) which was in pr odu c- of every thing. Nobody can visit th e German tion in Germany, and only a few of them were port s without r ea lising that a very high pr o- in commission at the time of the s urr end er . portion of the whole war potentia l of th e Only one had complet ed an exte nd ed cruise, cou ntry was devot ed to th e production of which h ad been in the natur e of a trial of th e U-boats, and that designers a nd con structo rs new typ e. This was " U. 3008 ," which was had been given a far greater degree of fr ee dom the vessel exa mined. r rh e Ge rmans obviously than ha s over been accorded to them on thi s thoug ht very highly of this type, for th ey s ide of the North Sea. In Ge rmany, U-boats h ad ordered no less th an 200 of th em. were not only " priority one "- they held rrhis U-boat had some featur es which were . n ea rly all the priorities, a nd the regimenta- quite revolutionary in submar ine practice, tion required of constructor s of pr efabricated and a performance which was regarded as parts was more than balanced by the very legendary until it had been established free hand given to the designers. One can beyo nd possibility of doubt . · hardly ima gine a U-boat designer, ha ving Before giving any detailed description of perfected some new "g adget " which h ad thi s boat and her fittings it may be as well t o been proved to be of value during sea tri als, o utline some of th e facts which seemed so h av ing to pursue th e matt er through various aston ishing to th ose accust omed t o th e more Gover nment compartments and comp ete with orth odox s ubm arine design and compare the production of all manner of other goods, th em with th e la te st ava ilable information both in the mat erial an.d in the labo ur regarding our own submar in es. market. It is therefore no refl ec tion upon British designers of subma rines t o say that , in some dir ect ions, German s ubmarin e design and co ns tru ct ion, as discovered and stud ied by British experts after the surrender of Ger- many, is ahead of that of Groat Britain . Ono must observ e th e qualifying phr ase " in some directions, '' and avoid th e pitfall of thin k ing that everything th at is novel is necessarily good. In th e type " 21 " U-boat, for inst ance, which was the largest and th e l atest in pro- Ciluotion, th ere are many things which make the mouths of British submarine officers wat er. On th e other ha nd , there are many British submar in e offic e rs who would cr iti cise . th e design with some justice on certain grounds- notably th at th e offensive arma - ment is comparatively small for th e size of th e craft.' There is no doubt , however, that we have much to learn from th e capt ured U-boats. It may be a hard saying, but in the forcing house of war German designers have solved problems which we have long considered insoluble. It is c uri ous, t oo, to noti ce that the German solutions are ao fr equentl y pro- du ced by simplicity a nd a ruthl ess reversion te first princ iples. Let us consider, for ins tance, th e " sohnorkel. " The great " secret " about thi s devi ce turn ed out on examinati on to be nothing moro th an th e adaptat ion of a prin- ciple which is broug ht int o use by everybody, every tim e they pull a la vatory plug I Co n- sider also th e question of the phenomenal s ubmerged speed of this very largo type '' 21 '' U-boat . It is obvious th at the Germans have argued th e matt er something like thi s :- If , a.s is common s ubmarine practice, one c an grea tly increase the s ubmerged speed by grouping the batteries, one can get an even higher speed range by grouping the ba tt eries yet again. But in the usual submarine this (,annot be done, because of th e limited numb er I P.E E D, D EPTH, AN D E N DlJ RANOE Th e type " 21 " U-boat is a vessel of appr ox imat ely 1600 tons displacement when on the s urf ace. H er speed on th e s urf ace, even with a supercharger, is slow by com- pari so n wi th th e equivale nt British a nd American typ os, a nd she is not fitted with a g un of a size which would mak e her capable uf engag ing a ship. Neither of th ese facts is surpri sing, for th ere is no doubt that th e type "2 1 "U- boat is not designed for surface work. She was not oven expected to pr oceed on the surface when going to a nd from h er operational area. She is, in fact, a submarine in th e true sense of th e word, rat h er th an a s ubmersible . 'rhi s s ubm arine was not designed to come to th e s urf aco except when e nt ering or leaving ha rb o ur , or, of cour se, if temporary outs id e repa ir s had to be don e at sea. In th e normal co ur se of event s "U. 3008 " could rema in at sea for fiv e mo nth s with out ever coming to th e surface a nd th e German o ffi ce rs averred that, if every nook and cran ny in the s ubmarin e were pac ked with provisions, the s ubmarine wou ld be able to r ema in at sea- submerged all the time, if ne cessary- for as long as nin e month s. Thi s, however, had n ot been done, and the records of U-boats which have been s urr endered do not co ntain any reference to a U-boat remaining submerged for more than seventy days. The U- boats of thi s type were actua lly te s ted t o a depth of 900ft., whereas British s ubma rines are te st ed to 200ft. and 300ft. according to type. In emergency, th e type "2 1 " U-boat is oapablo · of a submerged speed of 16 knots, a lthough, of course, only for a s hort tim e. Wh en one considers th at tho fastest und erwater speed of the normal sub marine is in th e natur e of 8 or 9 kn ots, one begins to appr ec iate that th e fi gure of 16 knots for the full speed when s ubmerged of a vessel of more than 1600 ton s is really amazmg. JULY 6, 1945 It iH true that in the last war, when we decided to set s ubmarin es t o oat oh th e U- we built a small " R " c lass which had a desig ned speed below water of 15 krwts, but th ese , were small boat s an d the increase in submerged s peed was only achieved at the expense of nearly all the s urfa ce speed and the fitting of enormous batteries which took an un conscionabl e time to charge. The full speed of 16 knot s s ubmerged, ca n of course, only be maintained for a very few r,ninut os, but th ose minutes mig ht we ll enable th e s ubmarine to evade its hunt erH. The very fast s ubmerged spoed is, in fact, more of a defensive than an offens ive c hara c- teris ti c, a lth ough it would, of course, be of the utmost use on occasions wh en attacking, particularly if th e targ et ship was sig ht ed lat e and passing a long way off or a lt ered co ur se away during th e attack . A cc ELERATIO N It is rath er ex traordin a ry th at in th.is type of U-boat it is app are ntly possible to acceler- ate quickly to this full speed and then to decel erate again without having undu o trouble with the dep th keeping. When a s ubmerged submarine su'ddenly increases her speed there is an in ev itabl e tendency for the bows t o rise. The effect of thi s angle up by the bow is acce ntuat ed by th e inc rea s ing s peed and th e s ubm a rin e h as a dangerous tendency to break surface out of co ntr ol, particularly in a large a nd long vessel. This tend ency mu st, in the nature of things, be common to all types of s ubm a rin es and it can on ly be reduced by design- nover era dicat ed. It is du o to th e fa ct that a. s ubmarine mu st h ave a conning tower and bridge. In other wo rds, th ere must always be an excrescence, which, on sudden accelera tion , lead s to an increased water pressure well above th e line of thru st of th e screws, so t h at there is a m ar ked upward turning moment . In any s ubma rine the hydrop lan es hav e to bo given " di ve angle" on a s udden increase of speed when s ubm erged. It is probabl e that in U-b oats of this type, th e hy droplan es are put to " ha rd to dive " as the acceleration beg in s to take effect . Were tliis n ot don e there is no doubt that a large s ubmarine which increased its s ubm erged speed s uddenly from 4 or 5 knots t o 16 knots would inevit - ably shoot to the surface out of control and with a very big angle up by the bow. One wonders wheth er some of the tale s on e has h eard ofU-boats br ea king s urf ace at astonish- ing angles up by th e bow have not ha d th eir origin in the un expectedly high rate of s ub - merged acceler ation of which many of them were capabl e. . This te nd ency to br ea k s urf ace on acoolora- tion opens up anoth er tr ain of th oug ht . The eff ec t of h yd roplan es and of an ang le on a ::J ubmarine increases rapidly with an increase in the speed of the vesse l. If th e hydro- planes have to be put to " hard to di ve" and an angle down by the bow put on tho sub- marine as the order to incr ease to full speed is giv on it is quit e poss ibl e that th eso would more than overr id e the upward moment. Th ey certainly wo uld override it at so me point between the beginning and the end of the period of accelerati on, the actua l mome nt of overrid e being depend e nt upon th e hull and con ning tower form a nd th e design of the hydroplanes. The moment this over ride comes into pl ay t he angle on the su bmarine, the angle a nd off eot of the hy droplan es, a nd th e in crease of speed will all t o nd to drive the s ubmarine down, and in a long submarine it is a lmost certa in th at co ntrol would be lost for a time . Is it not mor e than likely that appre ci at i on of this dang er-a dan ger which led to disaster in more than ono of th e big fa st

Upload: others

Post on 05-May-2020

13 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Type 21 U-Boat boat~, · 2 THE ENGINEER The Type 41. 21 " U-Boat (By Ou1· Naval Correspondent) No. I IT is perhaps inevitable that a nation in which of battorie1:1 .Then why

2 THE ENGINEER

The Type 41. 21 " U-Boat (By Ou1· Naval Correspondent )

No. I

IT is perhaps inevitable that a nation in which of battorie1:1 . Then why not have more everything has boon for long koyed t o a batteries 1

single aim and a single arm, should be ablo t o It is all delightfully simplo, and yet a corn­produce something better in this specialise~ • bination of these innovations has produced cat egory than the experts of a nation in an underwater craft which is, quit e litorally, which research, design, and construction revolutionary in many points of design and have necossarily been spread over a. wide of performance. field.. The contrast betwoen Germany and The writor r ecently had the opportunity Great Britain is one of highly specialised of spending several hours in making a det ailed effort on the one hand, as against a potential examination of one of the type" 21 "U-boats. which has had to be used sparingly in certain This was the lat est ocean-going form (apart fields in order that there should bo enough from experimental craft) which was in produc­of everything. Nobody can visit the German tion in Germany, and only a few of them were ports without realising that a very high pro- in commission at the time of the surrender . portion of the whole war potential of the Only one had complet ed an extended cruise, country was devot ed to the production of which had been in the nature of a trial of the U-boats, and that designers and constructors new type. This was " U. 3008," which was had been given a far greater degree of freedom the vessel examined. rrhe Germans obviously than has over been accorded to them on this thought very highly of this type, for they side of the North Sea. In Germany, U-boats had ordered no less than 200 of them. were not only " priority one "-they held rrhis U-boat had some features which were

. nearly all the priorities, and the regimenta- quite revolutionary in submarine practice, tion required of constructors of prefabricat ed and a performance which was regarded as parts was more than balanced by the very legendary until it had been established free hand given to the designers. One can beyond possibility of doubt.

· hardly imagine a U-boat designer, having Before giving any det ailed description of perfected some new "gadget " which had this boat and her fittings it may be as well t o been proved to be of value during sea trials, outline some of the facts which seemed so having to pursue the matter through various astonishing to those accust omed t o the more Government compartments and compete with orthodox submarine design and compare the production of all manner of other goods, them with the latest available information both in the material an.d in the labour regarding our own submarines. market.

It is therefore no reflection upon British designers of submarines t o say that, in some directions, German submarine design and construction, as discovered and studied by British experts after the surrender of Ger­many, is ahead of that of Groat Britain. Ono must observe the qualifying phrase " in some directions, '' and avoid the pitfall of thinking that everything that is novel is necessarily good.

In the type " 21 " U-boat , for inst ance, which was the largest and the latest in pro­Ciluotion, there are many things which make the mouths of British submarine officers water. On the other hand, there are many British submarine officers who would criticise . the design with some justice on certain grounds- notably that the offensive arma­ment is comparatively small for the size of the craft.'

There is no doubt, however, that we have much t o learn from the captured U-boats. It may be a hard saying, but in the forcing house of war German designers have solved problems which we have long considered insoluble. It is curious, t oo, to notice that the German solutions are ao frequently pro­duced by simplicity and a ruthless reversion te first principles.

Let us consider, for instance, the " sohnorkel. " The great " secret " about this device turned out on examination to be nothing moro than the adaptation of a prin­ciple which is brought into use by everybody, every time they pull a lavatory plug I Con­sider also the question of the phenomenal submerged speed of this very largo t ype '' 21 '' U-boat. It is obvious that the Germans have argued the matter something like this :­If, a.s is common submarine practice, one can greatly increase the submerged speed by grouping the batteries, one can get an even higher speed range by grouping the batteries yet again. But in the usual submarine this (,annot be done, because of the limited number

I P.EE D, D EPTH, AND E N DlJRANOE

The t ype " 21 " U-boat is a vessel of approximat ely 1600 tons displacement when on the surface. H er speed on the surface, even with a supercharger, is slow by com­parison with the equivalent British and American t ypos, and she is not fitted with a gun of a size which would make her capable uf engaging a ship. Neither of these facts is surprising, for there is no doubt that the type "21 "U-boat is not designed for surface work. She was not oven expected t o proceed on the surface when going to and from her operational area. She is, in fact, a submarine in the true sense of the word, rather than a submersible .

'rhis submarine was not designed to come to the surfaco except when entering or leaving harbour, or, of course, if temporary outside repairs had to be done at sea. In the normal course of events "U. 3008 " could remain at sea for five months without ever coming to the surface and the German officers averred that, if every nook and cranny in the submarine were packed with provisions, the submarine would be able to remain at sea­submerged all the time, if necessary- for as long as nine months. This, however, had not been done, and the records of U-boats which have been surrendered do not contain any reference to a U-boat remaining submerged for more than seventy days.

The U-boats of this type were actually tested t o a depth of 900ft., whereas British submarines are test ed to 200ft. and 300ft. according to type. In emergency, the type "21 " U-boat is oapablo ·of a submerged speed of 16 knots, although, of course, only for a short time. When one considers that tho fastest underwater speed of the normal submarine is in the nature of 8 or 9 knots, one begins to appreciate that the figure of 16 knots for the full speed when submerged of a vessel of more than 1600 tons is really

• amazmg.

JULY 6, 1945

It iH true that in the last war, when we decided to set submarines t o oat oh the U- boat~, we built a small " R " class which had a designed speed below water of 15 krwts, but these , were small boat s and the increase in submerged speed was only achieved at the expense of nearly all the surface speed and the fitting of enormous batteries which took an unconscionable t ime to charge.

The full speed of 16 knots submerged, can of course, only be maintained for a very few r,ninutos, but those minutes might well enable the submarine to evade its hunterH. The very fast submerged spoed is, in fact, more of a defensive than an offensive charac­teristic, although it would, of course, be of the utmost use on occasions when attacking, particularly if the target ship was sighted late and passing a long way off or altered course away during the attack .

A ccELERATION

It is rather extraordinary that in th.is type of U-boat it is apparently possible to acceler­ate quickly t o this full speed and then to decelerate again without having unduo trouble with the depth keeping. When a submerged submarine su'ddenly increases her speed there is an inevitable t endency for the bows t o rise. The effect of this angle up by the bow is accentuated by the increasing speed and the submarine has a dangerous tendency to break surface out of control, particularly in a large and long vessel. This tendency must , in the nature of things, be common to all types of submarines and it can only be reduced by design- nover eradicated. It is duo to the fact that a. submarine must have a conning tower and bridge. In other words, there must always be an excrescence, which, on sudden acceleration, leads to an increased water pressure well above the line of thrust of the screws, so t hat there is a marked upward turning moment.

In any submarine the hydroplanes have to bo given " dive angle" on a sudden increase of speed when submerged. It is probable that in U-boats of this type, the hydroplanes are put to " hard to dive " as the acceleration begins to take effect . Were tliis not done there is no doubt that a large submarine which increased its submerged speed suddenly from 4 or 5 knots t o 16 knots would inevit­ably shoot to the surface out of control and with a very big angle up by the bow. One wonders whether some of the tales one has heard ofU-boats breaking surface at astonish­ing angles up by the bow have not had their origin in the unexpectedly high rate of sub­merged acceleration of which many of them were capable. .

This t endency to break surface on acoolora­tion opens up another t rain of thought. The effect of hydroplanes and of an angle on a ::Jubmarine increases rapidly with an increase in the speed of the vessel. If the hydro­planes have t o be put to " hard to dive" and an angle down by the bow put on tho sub­marine as the order to increase to full speed is givon it is quite possible that theso would more than override the upward moment. They certainly would override it at some point between the beginning and the end of the period of acceleration, the actual moment of override being dependent upon the hull and conning tower form and the design of the hydroplanes. The moment this override comes into play t he angle on the submarine, the angle and offeot of the hydroplanes, and the increase of speed will all t ond to drive the submarine down, and in a long submarine it is almost certain that control would be lost for a time. Is it not more than likely that appreciation of this danger-a danger which led to disaster in more than ono of the big fast

Page 2: The Type 21 U-Boat boat~, · 2 THE ENGINEER The Type 41. 21 " U-Boat (By Ou1· Naval Correspondent) No. I IT is perhaps inevitable that a nation in which of battorie1:1 .Then why

JULY 6, 1945

British " K" class submarines- is the reason for t esting the hulls of the big U-boats t o the great depth of 900ft.1

The ability to dive safely to great depth has, of course, other advantages. There have been a. great many occasions during the war when we have heard ofU-boats being " blown to the surface" by depth charges. There have probably been occasions on which this has been due to the emergency blowing of the submarine's tanks in a. desire to reach the surface and save life after the vessel has received crippling damage. The words " blown to the surface by depth charge attack'' which have appeared in several official announcements, however, definitely suggest that the depth charges have exploded beneath the submarine and that their explo­sion has forced the submarine up until it has broken surface. This is perfectly feasible, not to say desirable. Moreover, there is no deny­ing that the effect of a depth charge beneath a submarine, where the sea pressure is already large and where the space for the explosion between the hull and the sea. bed may be limited, is apt to be greater- and certainly more satisfying to the attackers-than the explosion of depth charges above the vessel. It is therefore quite possible that the tested depth of the new U-boats has a definite relationship with the German information of the deep depth settings normally used on our depth charges.

Some of the capabilities of the U-boa.ts of this t ype are almost reminiscent of the fancies of J ules V erne-nine months below the surface, capable of 16 knots under water in emergency, and safe at a depth of 900ft.

These were qualifications so high that they would have been deemed impossible a short time ago. The Germans were forced to make them possible and workable, a.nd they were forced to integrate other factors in their design and building in order that they should fit in with the general conception of the possibility of these "super-U-boats."

HABITABILITY

German designers and bui.lders had com­bined to produce a. U-boat which was capable of keeping a.t sea. for a. very long time. There was no doubt that German systems of training young men and officers would pro­duce efficient personnel, but neither fanatic­ism nor short-time training could produce a personnel which could be trusted below the surface for several months on end without risk of revolt against the discomfort and lack of privacy which has always been considered the price of service in submarines in all

• naVIes. If a. submarine is designed to remain ~t

sea-and submerged- for very long periods, one of the primary considerations must be habitability. If men have to live and work in a machine, there is no sense in producing a perfect machine if the men cannot live and work in it with the same human endurance as the endurance of the machine.

Examination of the type "21 " U-boat shows that the Germans were fully aware of this truth. In parenthesis it may be remarked that this solicitude for the comfort and well­being of the personnel was a direct antithesis of that in the surface ships of the German Navy of the last war, in which living con­ditions for the crews were reduced to the lowest compatible with short periods at sea. and long periods in harbour. It was this German philosophy of living conditions which allowed them to subdivide their ships to an extent which reduced enormously their chances of being sunk, but at the same time reduced their seagoing efficiency, except for sorties of short duration. One remembers that this was one of the fact ors which limited

• THE ENGINEER 3

the operations of the High Seas Fleet in the frames fitted externally is not as strong as a last war. hull with internal frames. In the German

In the type " 21 " U-boat there is no design, however, this is more than made up necessity for any members of the crew to for by the use of larger and stronger frames. work on what British submarine personnel When all is said and done, the size of an used to call " the hot bunk principle "-that internal frame is strictly limited by the is, turning in to the bunk of the man who has amount of space which can be allotted to it relieved one on watch. In " U. 3008" there within the submarine's hull-a consideration is a comfortable sprung bunk for every which does not arise in the case of external member of the crew-and every bunk is frames. Any weakness in this design is provided with a. fitted mattress. Moreover, therefore more than compensated by the all the 'living spaces are enclosed in light fire- fitting of larger and stronger frames, for the proofed wooden bulkheads and are on either size of these external frames is immaterial. side of a central gangway running right The frames in this type of U-boat are, in through the submarine and deviating from fact, nearly twice the size of those in the the centre line only in the control room, average British submarine. where it has to skirt the casing of the big The plating of the pressure hull, comprising power-operated periscope. Officers and men both the upper and lower sections, has a therefore have a degree of privacy far beyond minimum thickness of 1·lin., and this is that usual in submarines, where a " mess" increased to about 1tin. in certain places may also be a gangway, and sometimes even where weakness would otherwise be caused a. table set up in the torpedo-working com- by penetrations of the plating, such as around pa.rtment, so that it is " ' fish' for break- the hatches . fast, 'fish ' for dinner, ' fish' for supper, ' fish ' for every meal ! ''

There is little doubt that this system of enclosed messes and a clear central gangway makes for efficiency as well as comfort, for it does away with the necessity for men sling­ing hammocks or sleeping on mess tables or on the deck-practices which are apt to turn a. gangway into a complicated assault course in emergency.

H ULL SECTION

The type "21 " U-boa.t has a. novel and peculiar hull section, which also increases the spaciousness and habitability of the sub­marine. This hull section is ca.lled " figure of eight," which almost exactly describes it. The section amidships consists of the usual circular section pressure hull, with beneath it another smaller circular section pressure hull. These two circular section hulls are not separate, and, in effect, they form part of the same " figure of eight " sectioned pressure hull. Each part is not only immensely strong in itself; they are joined by very strong plating which is worked on a curve so that there is no weakness at the junction of the two parts of the hull.

This peculiar hull form increases stability, and also very considerably increases the space within the upper part of the pressure hull, which cont ains the living quarters. This is because the electric batteries, the big refrigerat ed store rooms, the internal ballast tanks for trimming purposes, and a certain amount of the auxiliary machinery have been banished to the lower part of the pressure hull section. The result is that the whole diameter of the upper part of the ·hull, except where it is cut off by the flat deck across the junction of the two parts, is avail­able space. In normal submarine practice rather more than one-third of the hull section is taken up by the batteries and internal ballast tanks.

In the German submarines of this type the space within the pressure hull is still further increased by the simple expedient of placing the frames outside instead of inside the plating.

This method of construction adds, in • effect, some lOin. to the useful diameter of the inside of the pressure hull. At the same time it simplifies to a very great degree the fitting of pipes, electric cables, and fittings. This simplification means, of course, that less space is taken up in the actual fitting of the essential requirements, as well as the refinements, and it makes the fitting of built-in furniture a. simple matter, instead of an art which often appears to have been practised by a Torquemada with an apostle of discomfort at his elbow.

Technically, of course, a hull with the

THE OuTER SKIN

Built round the " figure of eight " pressure hull and over the external framing of the hull is the outer skin of the submarine, which gives the vessel a. very fine streamlined form. Between the outer hull and the pressure hull are the main ballast t anks and the compen­sated fuel tanks, in both of which the internal pressure is automatically equalised with the sea. pressure when diving, so that the outer hull can safely be built of light plating. This, of course, is normal submarine practice.

It is interesting to note that in this type of U-boat 'there are no Kingston valves at the bottom of the main ballast tanks. These are open to' the sea at the bottom, so that the suomarine when on the surface is "riding on the vents "-that is, prevented from losing buoyancy by the air lock trapped and held in the main ballast t anks by the vents. This system, which is by no means new, has the advantage that only one valve for each tank has to be opened in order to submerge, even if the submarine has not been previously brought to a condition of instant readiness for diving. The vents are, of course, operated by tele~p.otor from a panel of levers in the control room.

While considering the streamlining of this U-boat it is of interest that the U-boats of this type differ from the normal German submarine practice in that their forward hydroplanes are above water when in surface trim and turn in to the casing when not in use. The usual German practice has been for U-boats to have their forward hydroplanes fixed in the " turned out " position and " drowned "-that is, set low down on the hull below the torpedo tubes, so that they are always below water. In the type "21 " U-boat the designers ha. ve adopted exactly the opposite principle.

The whole of the conning tower and bridge structure is very carefully streamlined. The bridge itself is covered with light armour plating as a protection against machine gun attack from the air, and this, of course, adds to its streamlines. In this armoured top to the bridge there are two spaces, one on each side of the bridge, for the heads and shoulders of the look-outs. Just before these there is a central " hole in the roof," through which projects a simple type of night torpedo sight. This sight is fitted with a. pair of large night binoculars, which are immensely heavy. The reason is that they are water and pressure­tight, and are also tested to a depth of 900ft. Thus they can safely be left in place on the night sight without fear of becoming flooded and useless when the U-boat has to " crash dive."

The Germans seem to go to great lengths in

Page 3: The Type 21 U-Boat boat~, · 2 THE ENGINEER The Type 41. 21 " U-Boat (By Ou1· Naval Correspondent) No. I IT is perhaps inevitable that a nation in which of battorie1:1 .Then why

P 0 R T S ~~ N D- A R C H I T E C T U R E 0 F B R A Z I L

-\

-~ - ....... ?~~kw.~ ......... ... ...

... ~ ""' .. ,. ~· - -- ........ ~

-~

•.:-.41ft ~.. ...... - . . --·-: ~~-~~---- .. '~ ~ • , ... . . . ... ~- . . . . -... " .. · ~ . -~ . -. . ~. - .:.~ .. _.._ .......... , .......

~ . '·

THE WATER FRONT OF RIO DE JANEIRO

THE PORT OF SANTOS

(F or description see opp osite page) .

-- ""'!: • • • . ---· -----.. -~ -- . I I -- ... -- , - ""7'i: ~ . - - -~

-.. ---~ .. .

'

AVENIDA RIO BANCO. RIO DE JANEIRO

THE YPIRANGA MEMORIAL. SAO PAULO

~ -· • • •

I • 11 •

~

8 ~ t;j

l;::j

z 0 l--4

z ~ t;j

~ •

~ t'4 t< 0:0 ... ~

<:0 ~ 0\

Page 4: The Type 21 U-Boat boat~, · 2 THE ENGINEER The Type 41. 21 " U-Boat (By Ou1· Naval Correspondent) No. I IT is perhaps inevitable that a nation in which of battorie1:1 .Then why

,JULY 6, 1945

their streamlining, and when the "schnorkel" came into use and led to the U-boats remain­ing under water throughout their operational trips, so that quick diving and quick surfacing lost their importance, they seized the oppor­tunity of increasing the streamlining of the

THE ENGINEER

superstructure of their U-boats by doing away with the flooding and draining ports in the free-flooding structure. In some U­boats one can see where patches have been welded in to eradicate these ports.

(To be continued)

An Engineer Looks at Brazil By ROLT HAMMOND, A.C.G.I., Assoc. M. Inst. C.E.

No. I

RI O DE JANEIRO is one of the most beautiful cities in the world. Art and

imagination have been perfectly mingled to bestow upon this city of nearly two million souls, the second largest in Latin America and capital of the United States of Brazil, its remarkable character. Its amazingly rapid growth during the last half century is an index of that spirit of enterprise and restless energy which animates modern Brazil, a country abounding in rich natural resources.

In Rio itself the Government Buildings, the Municipal Theatre, the School of Art, and the Supreme Court of Law show by their varied styles of architecture the many different influences which have contributed to the making of this great country; a note of extreme modernity is struck by the building of the Press Association, in which the influence of Le Corbusier is reflected. Rio's show street is the A venida Rio Branco, laid out on the finest principles of modern city planning, surpassed only by a promenade of white marble stretching almost unbroken for a distance of 5 miles. Rio is a symbol of Brazil as a whole, a country of sharp contrasts, exemplified by the fact that the primeval forest reaches to the very back blocks of the city ; within a few miles of this ultra-modern metropolis dwell primitive tribes living in little better conditions than those of their remote forefathers.

ception widely held in Great Britain. The country was discovered by Pedro Alvares Cabral, known as the Portuguese Columbus, in 1500, and early colonisation centred on the port of Bahia ; in 1552 Thome de Souza landed at Rio, exclaiming, " Tudo e graca que se dele pode decir "-" Everything here is of a beauty which can hardly be described."

' .. • •

the only colonists to arrive of their own accord were the " Crista.os novos, " or newly baptised Jews, who preferred to risk the uncertainties of Brazil rather than to endure persecution in Europe. They, too, had a. far-reaching effect on the future of this land.

Modern Brazil can be said to date from the year 1808; Napoleon invaded Portugal, causing Do m J oao, its ruler, to flee from his country and to seek sanctuary in Brazil . Thus Brazil became an empire, a striking fact unique in Latin American history ; Dom J oao returned to Lisbon, his mantle falling on Dom Pedro, who thereupon became regent. Then an astonishing event took place: Portuguese rule was overthrown and Dom Pedro created Emperor P edro I. Thus a rich and powerful Imperial court came into being, overshadowing in magnificence that of the mother country. During the nineteenth century immigration flourished on a huge scale to meet the labour demands of an expanding country ; Italians developed ao

The United States of Brazil is in reality a sub-continent, comprising nearly half of South America and covering an area sixty­five times that of England and greater than that of the United States. It is the fourth largest nation in the world, its frontiers touching every nation on the continent f'xcept Ecuador and Chile.

FIG. 2-PALACE OF JUSTICE, PERNAMBUCO

Brazilian history is full of romance and flamboyant exuberance, but it is a great mistake to imagine that an atmosphere of opera bouffe is typical of the Latin American republics; this is an unfortunate miscon-

Manoel de Nobrega, a Jesuit, had a profound influence on the early development of Brazil ; in 1549 he was Provincial Go.vernor of Bahia, and he displayed remarkable administrative abilities, both in this task and in the founding of Sao Paulo, the Manchester of modern Brazil. In order to develop the country, the Portuguese imported large numbers of slaves ;

• •

• FIG. 1-RIO DE JANEIRO AND ITS BAY

Paulo, Germans flocked to the rolling cattle lands of Rio Grande do Sui. Slavery was abolished in 1888 and a year later this was the main political issue which resulted in the dethronement of Dom Pedro II, who had nevertheless ruled his country in an exem­plary manner for nearly half a century.

The constitution of the Republic, the Estados Unidos do Brasil, was laid down in 1891 and was modelled closely on that of the United States. Recent Brazilian history is closely linked with the meteoric rise to pow~r of that forceful personality, Getulio Vargas, who has worked miracles in developing the resources of his country and in bringing about many far-reaching social and political reforms. His dynamic leadership has done much towards extending the industrialisation of Brazil.

Irt early colonial times, it was perhaps extremely fortunate that the economic struc­ture of Brazil was founded on such pursuits as forestry, farming, and stock raising ; it is significant, for example, that the country derives its name from the wood known as " brazil," a. dyewood found in the region of Pernambuco. These agricultural activities were well established during the early days of colonial expansion, when land was so cheap that it could almost be had for tht• asking.

The country was mercifully spared the cruelties and oppressions inflicted by the conquistadores a.nd treasure seekers on Me xi(O