the trouble with louisiana higher education retirement plans: a quick primer
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: THE TROUBLE WITH LOUISIANA HIGHER EDUCATION RETIREMENT PLANS: A Quick Primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649dc05503460f94ab47af/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
THE TROUBLE WITH LOUISIANA HIGHER
EDUCATION RETIREMENT PLANS:
A Quick Primer
![Page 2: THE TROUBLE WITH LOUISIANA HIGHER EDUCATION RETIREMENT PLANS: A Quick Primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649dc05503460f94ab47af/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
PROBLEM ONEUNFUNDED ACCRUED LIABILITY (“UAL”)
A large debt resulting from underfunding of the defined benefit plan
Imposed on ORP members at the inception of the ORP plan
Represents a de facto transfer or charging of state operating expenses to employees
Also affects TRSL (“defined benefit”) participants, although that impact is not immediately visible on pay stubs
![Page 3: THE TROUBLE WITH LOUISIANA HIGHER EDUCATION RETIREMENT PLANS: A Quick Primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649dc05503460f94ab47af/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
IMPACT OF THE “UAL”
For ORP members: Employees contribute 7.95%
Employer (LSU) contributes 23.7% Total contribution is 31.65% Of LSU’s contribution, only 5.97% reaches
employee accounts Of the total contribution of 31.65%, only
13.92% reaches employee accounts (43% of the amount paid)
Employer contribution demands are spiraling upward
![Page 4: THE TROUBLE WITH LOUISIANA HIGHER EDUCATION RETIREMENT PLANS: A Quick Primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649dc05503460f94ab47af/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
IMPACT OF “UAL” ON TRSL PARTICIPANTS
A circa $10,000,000.00 charge to LSU (and proportional charges to all other universities)
by way of contribution to the UAL. That money could be used for raises, facility
improvement, cultural activities, research travel, awards, professorships, or a thousand other good purposes. This charge is likely to
grow, and grow exponentially, in coming years.
![Page 5: THE TROUBLE WITH LOUISIANA HIGHER EDUCATION RETIREMENT PLANS: A Quick Primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649dc05503460f94ab47af/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
MORE UAL IMPACT ON TRSL PARTICIPANTS
Although it is not yet likely, it is not inconceivable that the UAL could expand to
proportions such that the TRSL defined benefit plan could become insolvent. In that case, retirees’ pensions would be in jeopardy or might be affected by federal intervention.
![Page 6: THE TROUBLE WITH LOUISIANA HIGHER EDUCATION RETIREMENT PLANS: A Quick Primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649dc05503460f94ab47af/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
PROBLEM TWO: LACK OF CHOICE
ORP began as the only alternative to a plan that required a ten-year vesting period in an institution with mobile faculty and six-year tenure windows
ORP participants have no control over their choice of vendors or fund offerings
Auditing of the ORP is done by private, contract auditors answerable to the state executive branch
The lack of independence from state agencies is of questionable legality
![Page 7: THE TROUBLE WITH LOUISIANA HIGHER EDUCATION RETIREMENT PLANS: A Quick Primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649dc05503460f94ab47af/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
PROBLEM THREE: GOVERNANCE
ORP is managed by TRSL but ORP members are not allowed to vote in TRSL elections (for Board members)
Higher education has only one Board representative of fifteen; the others are from K-12 or are political appointees
TRSL management testified AGAINST faculty governance delegates at legislative hearings
Some state lawmakers want substantial payment requirements to exit TRSL
![Page 8: THE TROUBLE WITH LOUISIANA HIGHER EDUCATION RETIREMENT PLANS: A Quick Primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649dc05503460f94ab47af/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
PROBLEM FOUR: COMPARISON TO BEST PRACTICES
No other comparable university or state deploys such a governance system
Comparable states and institutions offer higher-educator-pertinent retirement systems
Entailing of UAL on new plan (ORP) was of questionable legality
Uncertainty regarding status of plan with respect to Social Security exemption
![Page 9: THE TROUBLE WITH LOUISIANA HIGHER EDUCATION RETIREMENT PLANS: A Quick Primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649dc05503460f94ab47af/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
PROBLEM FIVE: CUSTOMER SERVICE
Lack of vendor expertise Selection of vendors by groups other than
clients Poor vendor customer service Difficulty in obtaining data Poor web sites Confusing statements, interfaces, and
documentation
![Page 10: THE TROUBLE WITH LOUISIANA HIGHER EDUCATION RETIREMENT PLANS: A Quick Primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649dc05503460f94ab47af/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
THE GOOD NEWS
Solutions and Initiatives