the third coming of bobby fischer? | chess news

NEWS SHOP DATABASE PLAYCHESS.COM SUPPORT DISTRIBUTORS

The third coming of Bobby Fischer?9/18/2001 The story is not going away, in fact it is gaining momentum. Many people believe that BobbyFischer has returned and is performing miracles on the Internet. Nigel Short said he was "99 per cent sure" hehas had played Fischer. Tim rabb, who was initially skeptical, has now seen the light. We have taken anothercloser look at the evidence. Check it out more

ChessBase 13 Download

ChessBase 13 is a personal, stand-alone chess database that has become the standardthroughout the world. Everyone uses ChessBase, from the World Champion to theamateur next door. It is the program of choice for anyone who loves the game and wantsto know more about it. Start your personal success story with ChessBase and enjoy yourchess even more.

More...

Is it a computer? Is it a program?No, it's Bobby Fischer (some wish)

The story is that Bobby Fischer sometimes logs on to the Internet Chess Club (ICC) as a guest and plays anincredible series of blitz games against random opponents. The pattern is always the same: "Fischer", whodoes not have an ICC handle, will make contact either directly or through a third person and then play aseries of very fast blitz games ("bullet chess"), using preposterous openings and whipping the living daylightsout of his opponents. They are sworn to secrecy, so the games are seldom published. Only the stories of theapparition, of the bone-chilling encounter with the ephemeral chess legend remains.

All this was a chess-club story, until Nigel Short went public with his encounter with the mysterious ICCFischer in the Telegraph last Sunday (9.9.01). Nigel revealed that he has played nearly 50 speed chess gamesagainst Fischer during the past year. "I am 99 per cent sure that I have been playing against the chesslegend. It's tremendously exciting," he said. In October last year, in the first of their four confrontations, Nigellost 0:8, although he is one of the world's best speed chess players. "In my opinion Fischer is a much strongerspeed chess player than Kasparov, which is incredible when one considers that at 58 he is virtually a geriatricin terms of the modern game," Nigel said.

Acevedo? Siegen 1970!

The final proof came when Nigel asked his mysterious opponent: "Do you know Armando Acevedo?" (anobscure Mexican player). The response was immediate: "Siegen 1970." Fischer had played Acevedo in theSiegen Chess Olympiad of 1970.

Okay, let's take a look at this piece of evidence first.

I have my ChessBase or Fritz program loaded.

I press Ctrl-F to get the search mask, type in Acevedo, Fischer.

269.90

29.90

Today on playchess.comSimul with IMMichael Kopylov

9/15/2015 Did you everplay against anInternational Master? IMMichael Kopylov plays a

simul at 8 pm GMT+1 in the Simultaneousroom versus Premium members. The earlybird catches the worm. Become PremiumMember!

News

CHESSBASE 13- MEGAPACKAGE -ENGLISHVERSIONChessBase 13 is apersonal, stand-alonechess database programthat has become thestandard throughout theworld. Everyone uses ChessBase, from theWorld Champion to the amateur next door.New functions: ChessBase-Cloud, improvedrepertoire function etc.

THE RUY LOPEZBREYER VARIATION

Pavel Eljanov explains indepth what Gyula Breyeralready saw in 1911 andwhat became an openingchoice of the likes ofKasparov, Kramnik, Anandor Carlsen. The Breyer

Variation, which is characterised by the knightretreat to b8.

CHESSBASEMAGAZINE EXTRA167

Repertoire idea by AdrianMikhalchishin: inflict an

LANGUAGE : DE EN ES

SEARCH : OK

OPENINGS A-Z

ChessBase

playchess.com

PLAYCHESS.COMNo registration! No download!

01:36 01:48 Nigel Short-Horak Michal

Full View Embed Board

The third coming of Bobby Fischer? | Chess News http://en.chessbase.com/post/the-third-coming-of-bobby-fischer-

1 of 5 9/15/15, 1:00 PM

Five seconds later I have the one game played between Acevedo and Fischer. The tournamentis given as "Siegen Olympiad 1970".

Maybe I would have added "It was an A49 Anti-King's Indian system with 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 g6." orsomething to that effect.As an experienced user it would take me about ten to fifteen seconds toprepare the message. I have know Nigel since he was a child, and I can tell you this is what hemeans when he says "immediately".

58-year-old genius at lightning chess

Now let us look at the logic of the whole story. After his "rematch" against Spassky in 1992 Fischer cannotreturn to the United States, since the State Department had forbidden the match which broke the embargoimposed on Yugoslavia at the time. Fischer spent a number of years in Hungary, today he lives in Japan. Is itpossible that from there he is fopping the Internet community?

The ICC Fischer usually starts his game with some really crazy moves, like 1.f3 d5 2.c3 Nf6 3.Kf2 e5 4.Ke3 or1.e4 c5 2.Ke2 Nc6 3.Ke3. And he wins. Aha, obviously this points to two things: the ICC Fischer wants toavoid the main lines of modern chess theory, just as he has propagated with his Fischer Random Chess.Secondly the legendary Fischer is the only player with the god-like abilities to actually win such games againststrong players all the way up to a top professional like Nigel Short.

Bobby Fischer 1972 in Reykjavik

and 1992 in Sveti Stefan

Okay, we look at the logic of this second piece of evidence. Since his historic match against Boris Spassky in1972 Fischer has only played 30 public games, in the 1992 rematch in Sveti and Beglrade. Do you believethat this man, now 58 years old, could suddenly resurface, and beat the strongest GMs in the world inlightning blitz games, after giving them a tremendous advantage in the opening? No, not beat them, tearthem to pieces, wipe the floor with them. If you can believe this you must have great powers of credulity andfaith.

But what is the alternative? Who else could be doing this? There is an obvious answer. Only a computer wouldbe able to do what the mysterious ICC Fischer has done on the Internet. In fact it is exactly what you wouldexpect from a fast, tactical program. You can easily try it out. Load Fritz, Junior, Shredder or Tiger, preferablyon a 1.4 MHz or faster machine, force the first moves of the ICC Fischer player and then play on against theprogram. At three minute time controls. You can also jump into the sea off the Florida coast and pick a fightwith the denizens swimming around there.

Personally I find it much easier to believe that Nigel Short and the rest are getting mauled by a very fastcomputer (and a very proficiet computer operator) than by a 58-year-old non-playing GM however greatand charismatic this player might have been thirty years ago. As to the question why on earth anyone wouldperpetrate such an eloborate hoax, I again have a pat answer: because it is fun! Can you imagine anythingmore entertaining than whipping Nigel Short, convincing him that he is getting licked by a ghost, and thenhaving him publish it all in the Telegraph.

12.99

29.90

9.90

9.90

9.90

isolated pawn upon theNimzo Indian! SergeiTiviakov: The best gameI ever played! Robert

Ris: analysis of one the most famous games:Botvinnik-Capablanca (AVRO 1938). Plus39.097 topical games

ENGLISH ATTACK

Daniel Gormally showshow to combine strategicand attacking ideas in thesicilian. Use the englishattack as a lethal weapon!

A DANGEROUSANTI-SICILIAN: 1.E4C5 2.NF3 E6 3.G3!

Play like Carlsen, avoidtheory but without beingpassive or losing theinitiative.

ANTI-BAJONETE-ATTACK IN THEKING'S INDIAN

The Mar del PlataVariation in the King'sIndian could be faced withan uncomfortableBayonette Attack. Marinshows how to face that.

BEATING THEFRENCHACCORDING TOKUPREICHIK

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 c54.c3 Nc6 5.Be3!?. AndrewMartin uses the games ofKupreichik to show why

this line could catch many French aficionadosunprepared and is very dangerous for Black.

Advertising

Books, boards, sets: ChessNiggemann


2 of 5 9/15/15, 1:00 PM

Is it him, or isn't it him?

But not everbody gives up so easily. My old friend Tim Krabb originally thought the ICC player was notFischer. "Playing over these games, you get the impression that the mysterious guest is a fantastically strongplayer," wrote Tim in his Chess Diary (article 134). But he gives three reasons why the player cannot beFischer after all:

As a chessplayer, Fischer was always a gentleman. The real Fischer would not insult his opponents withridiculous openings.

1.

As Fischer indicated in one of his Radio Bombo interviews, using pseudonyms is typically Jewish. Thereal Bobby Fischer would never stoop to Jewishly logging on as guest-so-and-so - he would choose aname that would robustly reveal who he is.

2.

Most telling, the real Bobby Fischer would never play a move like Kf4, as in the game above, which isknown to have always been favored by Jews.

3.

The last point is tongue-in-cheek: Krabb gives positions by three Jewish players who, deep in the game, hadindeed moved their kings to the square f4 (Tim is a chess humourist).

Now Tim has had a change of heart and frankly says "I take back everything I saidand claim the opposite" (see Chess Diary article 139). He has found convincingevidence that the ICC player is not a computer. The evidence turned up in a series of25 three-minute blitz games that one 'Guest71' played on 24 April 2001 against'Beber', the French IM Robert Fontaine (right), who had then an ICC rating of 2827(and a FIDE-rating of 2452). guest71, always with absurd openings, won 20 games,lost 3, and two games were drawn. For Tim the most interesting game was thefollowing:

Guest71 Beber, ICC 3 0, 2001: 1.e4 c5 2.Ke2 Nc6 3.Ke3 g6 4.Nc3 Nd4 5.d3Nf6 6.Kd2 d5 7.Ke1 Bg7 8.h3 O-O 9.a3 e5 10.Bg5 Be6 11.exd5 Bxd512.Nxd5 Qxd5 13.c3 Ne6 14.Be3 Rad8 15.Qa4 e4 16.dxe4 Nxe4 17.Rc1 a618.Be2 b5 19.Qxa6 c4 20.Rd1 Qf5 21.Nf3 Nxc3 22.bxc3 Bxc3+ 23.Nd2 Nc5 24.Bxc5 Bxd2+ 25.Rxd2Rxd2 26.Kxd2 Rd8+ 27.Kc1 Qe5.

Tim Krabb writes: "White is two Bishops up, but he cannot prevent a perpetual with 28...Qa1+ or, after28.Kb1, with Qf5+ 29.Ka1 Qe5+. White played the surprising 28.Bxc4. At first, I thought this was a typicalcomputer move. My computer programs do look at it, but finally they play 28.Qxb5 Qa1+ with a draw.However, there is also a typical human maxim for this kind of situation: "You can only take one at a time." Sowhy not Bxc4? after Qxc5, you have 29.Qxb5, and will remain a pawn up. What makes Bxc4 human too, isthat it does not change the result: after 28...bxc4 29.Qb6 it's still a draw with Qa1+. It could just as well be avery human last attempt to let the opponent go wrong, and win a drawn game."

What do we say to that? Well, a quick check with all top engines does reveal that they will play 28.Qxb5, butif the operator is running in multiple variation mode he might well see the text move come up as the secondor third best line.

In this example (on a 666 MHz computer) we can see that Deep Fritz sees at least two ways to draw theposition. If I select the second line, and then start entering the black moves as played by Beber/Fontaine,Fritz duplicates every single move after that, all the way to the final mate: 28...Qc3+ 29.Kb1 bxc4 30.Rc1Qb3+ 31.Ka1 Rd2 32.Qc8+ Kg7 33.Bf8+ Kf6 34.Qc6+ Kf5 35.Qc5+ Kf6 36.Qe7+ Kf5 37.Qxf7+ Kg538.Be7+ Kh6 39.Qf8+ Kh5 40.g4#.

A bit of further exploration reveals that some programs actually have 28.Bxc4 as their first line:


3 of 5 9/15/15, 1:00 PM

0 TweetTweet 3

As you can see in the picture above Gambit Tiger (a good choice for the wild ICC Fischer games)switches to 28.Bxc4 after one second. It sticks with this move for as long as you care to let it run.

Tim has one more argument: "The ICC keeps this kind of game in their database, with times used for eachmove. When I looked at that, I was in for a surprise: guest71 never took more than 3 seconds for any movein that game, but 28.Bxc4 cost him 12 seconds."

Interesting. That means that he was probably using Deep Fritz in multi-variation mode, and paused to thinkabout the options available at move 28. He may have even played through a few moves and decided thatthere were greater pitfalls after 28.Bxc4. Or he may have simply run through the first line to see the fulldraw (28.Qxb5 Qa1+ 29.Kc2 Qa2+ 30.Kc3 Qd2+ 31.Kxc4 Qxe2+ 32.Kb4 Qb2+ 33.Kc4 =), before deciding togo for the"other drawing line".

Finally it is entirely possible that our ICC Fischer is using a dual processor system and running multipleengines, choosing the move he thinks is most promising.

Deep Fritz and Gambit Tiger running in parallel, each giving its first move.

So what do we conclude? It could be that Bobby Fischer hath decended unto us to play miraculous games ofchess. But Occams Razor forces at least the author of this piece to believe that ICC Fischer is a pranksterusing a fast computer and one or more of the top programs available today to create an urban legend that willstay alive in chess circles for a long time to come.

Games of ICC Fischer

We give you some of the games by "Fischer" on the ICC. The first 24 are against "Beber",which is the handle of IM Robert Fontaine. The second set is against "Ural", who is IMAlexander Reprintsev (42), FIDE rating: 2428 (June 2001). You can replay the game onour Java boards. You can use the control buttons below the board or click the notation onthe right, which will cause the board to follow.

If you have any theories on the games, e.g. which program duplicates the moves of"Fischer" in a specific game, or if you have played any games yourself against the ICCFischer, please contact us..

Here are the games

Frederic Friedel

Feedback and mail to our news servicePlease use this account if you want to contribute to or comment on our news page service

6 people like this.LikeLike ShareShare


4 of 5 9/15/15, 1:00 PM

See also

who's the strongest one of all?12/9/2001 When Fritz7 was released everyone was impressed including ourmost competent beta tester, Vladimir Kramnik (as reported on October 17 below).But some thought maybe Fritz7 was not so good at blitz. Well, a young Canadianlady named Sarah Bird, who is a dedicated computer chess fan, decided to findout. She played literally thousands of games with top-class programs. You will findher results more [Discuss]

ChessBase Player of the Year award3/15/2002 And the winner is... well, frankly a big surprise. We assumed thatour Player of the Year poll would elect Kramnik or Ponomariov, or maybe evenGarry Kasparov for the ChessBase title. Boy were we ever wrong! Before you clickon to more information try to guess who took the nomination. Maybe you have abetter feel for what was cool in chess in 2001. The final results are to be foundhere. [Discuss]

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

User: Password: Not registered yet? RegisterComment:

Submit Reset

2013 ChessBase GmbH | Osterbekstrae 90a | 22083 Hamburg | Germany | Privacy policy | Imprint | Contact | Home


5 of 5 9/15/15, 1:00 PM

the third coming of bobby fischer? | chess news

Documents