the theoretical background of factsage - crct
TRANSCRIPT
GTT-Technologies
The theoretical background of FactSage
The following slides give an abridged overviewof the major underlying principlesof the calculational modulesof FactSage.
GTT-Technologies
Table of Contents
1 Gibbs energy tree and Maxwell relations2 Properties derived from G3 Reaction equilibria and the Law of Mass Action4 Electro-chemical cells5 Complex Equilibria6 From G(T,P,ni) to Phase Diagrams7 Choice of Axes and Types of Phase Diagrams
Note: Click on the icon to return to ToC.
GTT-Technologies
The Gibbs Energy Tree
Mathematical methods are used to derive more information from the Gibbs energy ( of phase(s)or whole systems )
GibbsEnergy
Minimisation
Gibbs-Duhem
Legendre Transform.Partial Derivativeswith Respect tox, T or P
Equilibria
Phase DiagramMaxwellH, U, F µi,cp(i),H(i),S(i),ai,vi
Mathematical Method
Calculational result derived
from G
Page 1.1
GTT-Technologies
Thermodynamic potentials and their natural variablesVariables
Gibbs energy: G = G (T, p, ni ,...) Enthalpy: H = H (S,P, ni ,...) Free energy: A = A (T,V, ni ,...) Internal energy: U = U (S,V, ni ,...)
Interrelationships:A = U − T⋅SH = U + P⋅VG = H − T⋅S = U + P⋅V − T⋅S
Page 1.2
GTT-Technologies
PTii n
Gµ,
∂∂
=VTin
A
,
∂∂
=PSin
H
,
∂∂
=VSin
U
,
∂∂
=
Maxwell-relations:
Thermodynamic potentials and their natural variables
VPH=
∂∂
STG
−=∂∂
PP TT
S U V
H A
G
S V
and
Page 1.3
GTT-Technologies
...nV,S,const.for0 i,
==
dUU min
...np,T,const.for0 i,
==
dGG min
Thermodynamic potentials and their naturalEquilibrium condition:
...nU,T,const.for0 i,
==
dTA min
...np,S,const.for0 i,
==
dHH min
...nV,U,const.for0 i,
==
dSS max
Page 1.4
GTT-Technologies
Temperature
Composition
ii
i
i
npnpp
np
np
TGT
THc
TGTGSTGH
TGS
,2
2
,
,
,
∂∂
−=
∂∂
=
∂∂
−=+=
∂∂
−=
Use of model equations permits to start at either end!
Gibbs-Duhem integrationPartial Operator
Integral quantity: G, H, S, cp
Partial quantity: µi, hi, si, cp(i)
Thermodynamic propertiesfrom the Gibbs-energy
Page 2.1
GTT-Technologies
With (G is an extensive property!)
one obtains
T,pinG
i
∂∂
=µJ.W. Gibbs defined the chemical potential of a component as:
( ) mi GnG ∑=
Thermodynamic propertiesfrom the Gibbs-energy
( )
( ) mi
im
mii
i
Gn
nG
Gnn
∂∂
+=
∂∂
=
∑
∑µ
Page 2.2
GTT-Technologies
Transformation to mole fractions :
mi
imi
mi Gx
xGx
G∂∂
−∂∂
+= ∑µi
ii x
xx ∂
∂−
∂∂
+ ∑1 = partial operator
ii xn →
Thermodynamic propertiesfrom the Gibbs-energy
mpCipc
mpCmpC
mi
imi
mi Hx
xHx
Hh∂∂
−∂∂
+= ∑
mSis mS mS
Page 2.3
GTT-Technologies
Gibbs energy functionfor a pure substance• G(T) (i.e. neglecting pressure terms) is calculated from the
enthalpy H(T) and the entropy S(T) using the well-knownGibbs-Helmholtz relation:
• In this H(T) is
• and S(T) is
• Thus for a given T-dependence of the cp-polynomial (for example after Meyer and Kelley) one obtains for G(T):
TSHG −=
∫ ⋅= +T
p dTcHH298298
∫ ⋅+=T
p dTTcSS298298
232ln TFTETDTTCTBAG(T) +⋅+⋅+⋅⋅+⋅+=
Page 2.4
GTT-Technologies
Gibbs energy functionfor a solution• As shown above Gm(T,x) for a solution ϕ consists
of three contributions: the reference term, theideal term and the excess term.
• For a simple substitutional solution (only one lattice site with random occupation) one obtains using the well-known Redlich-Kister-Muggianupolynomial for the excess terms:
)/())()()((
))((ln),( )(,
kjii j k
ijkkk
ijkjj
ijkiikji
i j
n
jiijjii
iii
oiiim
xxxTLxTLxTLxxxx
xxTLxxxxRTGxxTGij
+++++
−++=
∑∑∑
∑∑ ∑∑∑=
0ν
ννϕϕ
Page 2.5
GTT-Technologies
Equilibrium condition:or
Reaction : nAA + nBB + ... = nSS + nTT + ...Generally :
For constant T and p, i.e. dT = 0 and dp = 0,and no other work terms:
min G= 0 dG=
∑ =i
iiB 0ν
∑=i
iidndG µ
Equilibrium considerationsa) Stoichiometric reactions
Page 3.1
GTT-Technologies
For a stoichiometric reaction the changes dni are given by the stoichiometric coefficients ni and the change in extend of reaction dξ.
Thus the problem becomes one-dimensional.One obtains:
[see the following graph for an example of G = G(x) ]
ξν d dn ii =
0==∑i
id dG ξνµ i
Equilibrium considerationsa) Stoichiometric reactions
Page 3.2
GTT-Technologies
Gibbs Energy as a function of extent of the reaction2NH3<=>N2 + 3H2 for various temperatures. It is assumed,that the changes of enthalpy and entropy are constant.
Extent of Reaction ξ
Gib
bs e
nerg
y G
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
T = 400K
T = 500K
T = 550K
Equilibrium considerationsa) Stoichiometric reactions
Page 3.3
GTT-Technologies
Separation of variables results in :
Thus the equilibrium condition for a stoichiometric reaction is:
Introduction of standard potentials µi° and activities aiyields:
One obtains:
0== ∑i
ii µdξdG ν
0==∆ ∑i
ii µG ν
iii aRTµµ ln+=
( ) 0=+ ∑∑i
iii
ii aRTµ lnνν
Equilibrium considerationsa) Stoichiometric reactions
Page 3.4
GTT-Technologies
It follows the Law of Mass Action:
where the product
or
is the well-known Equilibrium Constant.
∑ ∏−==∆i i
iiiiaRTµG νν ln
∏=i
iiaK ν
Equilibrium considerationsa) Stoichiometric reactions
∆−=
RTGK
exp
The REACTION module permits a multitude of calculations which are based on the Law of Mass Action.
Page 3.5
GTT-Technologies
Electro-chemical equilibrium
e + ... + N + M = ... + B + A + e NMBA ββαα νννννν
The mass balance equation is now:
Including the effect of the electrons being on different electrical potential one obtains:
0=+∑ ∑ jjjii Fz ϕνµν
Page 4.1
GTT-Technologies
µνϕνϕνααββ iieeeeee = ) z - z - ∑( F
Separation of the electrons from the otherspecies leads to:
( ) ( ln )oe e e i i i i i iF RT aβ αν φ φ ν µ ν µ ν− = = +∑ ∑
Finally one obtains:
Two extreme cases can be distinguished.
ln i
oi i
ie e
RTE aF F
νν µν ν
= +∑ ∏Or: Nernst‘sequation
Page 4.2
GTT-Technologies
A simple concentration cell
The sketch of a lamnda-probe (for control of a car-catalyst).
Page 4.3
GTT-Technologies
βα | (air) O | ZrO | gas)(exhaust O 222 |
βα eairOOe 4)()gasexhaust (4 22 +=+
)gas exh.(
)air(
2
2
22ln)(4
O
OoO
oO p
pRTF +−=− µµϕϕ αβ
) pln - pln ( F 4T R
)gas exh.(O)air(O 22 = E
The Nernst-equation:
The cell scheme:
The cell reaction:
The simple end result:
Page 4.4
GTT-Technologies
The Hall-Heroult cell: Production of liquid aluminium from solid alumina
The decisive phase diagram:
Page 4.5
GTT-Technologies
The Hall-Heroult cell
βe 6 CO 1.5 O 3 C 1.5 2-2 +=+
Al2 Al2e 6 3 =+ +α
The cell sketch:βe 6 CO 1.5 O 3 C 1.5 2
-2 +=+
Al2 Al2e 6 3 =+ +α
Page 4.6
GTT-Technologies
The Hall-Heroult cell
βα CO2(G) Al, eelectrolytmolten C ,OAl 32
Al 2Al 2e 6 3 =+ +α βe 6 CO 1.5 O 3 C 1.5 2
-2 +=+
βα eGCOAlCOAle 6)(5.125.16 232 ++=++
a aa pln
6 +
6 5.1COAl
2Al
5.1CO
32
2
FRT
FG = E
o∆
The cell scheme:
The two half cells:
The total cell reaction:
The Nernst-equation (full and simple):
F 6G o∆ = E
Page 4.7
GTT-Technologies
Modelling of Gibbs energy of (solution) phases
Pure Substance (stoichiometric)
Solution phase
( ),pT,nGG immϕϕϕ =
),(,, pTGG oom
ϕϕϕ µ ==
( )ex
m
idm
idm
refmm
GSTG
GG
,
,
,
ϕ
ϕ
ϕϕ
+∆−=+
=
Equilibrium considerationsb) Multi-component multi-phase approach
Choose appropriate reference state and ideal term, then check for deviations from ideality.See Page 2.5 for the simple substitutional case.
Page 5.1
GTT-Technologies
Complex EquilibriaMany components, many phases (solution phases), constant T and p :
with
or
( )∑ ∑ +==i
ioi
iiii aRTnnG lnµµ
ϕ
ϕ
ϕm
m
im GnG
p
∑ ∑
=
min=G
Equilibrium considerationsb) Multi-component multi-phase approach
Page 5.2
GTT-Technologies
Massbalance constraint
j = 1, ... , n of components b
Lagrangeian Multipliers Mj turn out to be the chemical potentials of the system components at equilibrium:
∑ =i
jiij bna
∑=j
jjMbG
Equilibrium considerationsb) Multi-component multi-phase approach
Deviding the above equation by Σbj yields theequation of the well know common tangent !
Page 5.3
GTT-Technologies
System ComponentsPhase ComponentsFe N O C Ca Si Mg
Fe 1 0 0 0 0 0 0N2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0O2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0C 0 0 0 1 0 0 0CO 0 0 1 1 0 0 0CO2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0Ca 0 0 0 1 0 0 0CaO 0 0 1 0 1 0 0Si 0 0 0 0 0 1 0SiO 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Gas
Mg 0 0 0 0 0 0 1SiO2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0Fe2O3 2 0 3 0 0 0 0CaO 0 0 1 0 1 0 0FeO 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Slag
MgO 0 0 1 0 0 0 1Fe 1 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0 1 0 0 0 0 0O 0 0 1 0 0 0 0C 0 0 0 1 0 0 0Ca 0 0 0 0 1 0 0Si 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Liq. Fe
Mg 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Example of a stoichiometric matrix for the gas-metal-slag system Fe-N-O-C-Ca-Si-Mg
aij j
i
Equilibrium considerationsb) Multi-component multi-phase approach
Page 5.4
GTT-Technologies
Use the EQUILIB module to execute a multitude of calculations based on the complex equilibrium approach outlined above, e.g. for combustion of carbon or gases, aqueous solutions, metal inclusions, gas-metal-slag cases, and many others .
NOTE: The use of constraints in such calculations (such as fixed heat balances, or the occurrence of a predefined phase) makes this module even more versatile.
Equilibrium considerationsMulti-component multi-phase approach
Page 5.5
GTT-Technologies
Phase diagrams as projections of Gibbs energy plotsHillert has pointed out, that what is called a phase diagram is derivable from a projection of a so-called property diagram. The Gibbs energy as the property is plotted along the z-axis as a function of two other variables x and y.
From the minimum condition for the equilibriumthe phase diagram can be derived as a projectiononto the x-y-plane.
(See the following graphs for illustrations of this principle.)
Page 6.1
GTT-Technologies
α
β γ
P
Tα+βα
β
γ
αβ
γ
µ
PT
Unary system: projection from µ-T-p diagram
Phase diagrams as projections of Gibbs energy plots
Page 6.2
GTT-Technologies
Binary system: projection from G-T-x diagram, p = const.
300
400
500
600
700
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0
T
CuxNiNi
G
Phase diagrams as projections of Gibbs energy plots
Page 6.3
GTT-Technologies
Ternary system: projection from G-x1-x2 diagram,T = const and p = const
Phase diagrams as projections of Gibbs energy plots
Page 6.4
GTT-Technologies
Use the PHASE DIAGRAM module to generate a multitude of phase diagrams for unary, binary, ternary or even higher order systems.
NOTE: The PHASE DIAGRAM module permits the choice of T, P, m (as RT ln a), a (as ln a), mol (x) or weight (w) fraction as axis variables. Multi-component phase diagrams require the use of an appropriate number of constants, e.g. in a ternary isopleth diagram T vs x one molar ratio has to be kept constant.
Phase diagrams generated with FactSage
Page 6.5
GTT-Technologies
0i i i iSdT VdP n d q dµ φ+ + = =∑ ∑Gibbs-Duhem:
i i i idU TdS PdV dn dqµ φ= − + =∑ ∑
N-Component System (A-B-C-…-N)
SVnAnB⋅⋅⋅
nN
T-P µAµB⋅⋅⋅
µN
Extensive variables
Corresponding potentials
jqii q
U
∂∂
=φiq
Page 7.1
GTT-Technologies
N-component system(1) Choose n potentials: φ1, φ 2, … , φ n
(2) From the non-corresponding extensive variables(qn+1, qn+2, … ), form (N+1-n) independent ratios(Qn+1, Qn+2, …, QN+1).
Example:
Choice of Variables which always give a True Phase Diagram
( )1+≤ Nn
( )11 +≤≤+ Nin∑+
+=
= 2
1
N
nJj
ij
q
[φ 1, φ 2, … , φ n; Qn+1, Qn+2, …, QN+1] are then the (N+1) variables of which 2 are chosen as axes
and the remainder are held constant.
Page 7.2
GTT-Technologies
MgO-CaO Binary System
φ1 = T for y-axis
φ2 = -P constant
for x-axis
S T
V -P
nMgO µMgO
nCaO µCaO
Extensive variables and corresponding potentials
Chosen axes variables and constants
( )CaOMgO
CaO
CaO
MgO
nnnQ
nq
nq
+=
=
=
3
4
3
Page 7.3
GTT-Technologies
S T
V -P
nFe mFe
nCr mCr
f1 = T (constant)
f2 = -P (constant)
x-axis
x-axis
(constant)
Fe - Cr - S - O System
Fe
Cr
Fe
Cr
S
O
nnQ
nq
nq=
=
=
=
=
5
6
5
4
3
2
2
µφ
µφ
2
2
S
O
µ
µ
2
2
S
O
n
n
Page 7.4
GTT-Technologies
Fe - Cr - C System improper choice of axes variables
S T
V -P
nC µC
nFe µFe
nCr µCr
φ1 = T (constant)
φ2 = -P (constant)
φ3 = µC → aC for x-axisandQ4 for y-axis
(NOT OK)
(OK)
( )
( )4
4
Cr
Fe C
Cr
e
r
F Cr C
nQn n n
nQn n
=+ +
=+
Requirement: 0 3j
i
dQfor i
dq= ≤
Page 7.5
GTT-Technologies
This is NOT a true phase diagram.
Reason: nC must NOT be used in formula for mole fraction when aC is an axis variable.
NOTE: FactSage users are safe since they are not given this particular choice of axes variables.See next slide!
M23C6
M7C3
bcc
fcc
cementitelog(ac)
Mol
e fr
actio
n of
Cr
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2
Fe - Cr - C Systemimproper choice of axes variables
Page 7.6
GTT-Technologies
Fe - Cr - C Systemproper choice of axes variables
Calculation is donein Phase Diagrammodule withX = mole Cr/(Cr+Fe)and y = log a(C).
Axes are swapedin Figure module.
Page 7.7
GTT-Technologies
- Type 1 or Potential Diagrams:
Two potentials, Φi vs Φj.
- Type 2 or Mixed Diagrams:
One potential and one ratio ofconjugate extensive properties, Φi vs QΦ
j/ΣQΦk.
- Type 3 or Extensive Property Diagrams:
Two ratios of conjugate extensive properties, QΦ
i/ΣQΦk vs QΦ
j/ΣQΦk
Only three types of 2D-phase diagrams possible
Page 7.8