the teacher effectiveness measure (tem): an overview and update
DESCRIPTION
The Teacher Effectiveness Measure (TEM): An Overview and Update. The Teacher Effectiveness Measure: More Than an Evaluation. The TEM System Is: A multi-measure evaluation tool A process for instructional leadership and management - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Spring 2011 Strategic Data Project ConveningDr. Rorie Harris and Jessica Lotz, Memphis City Schools
The Teacher Effectiveness Measure (TEM):
An Overview and Update
2
The Teacher Effectiveness Measure:More Than an Evaluation
40%
5%5%
35%
15%
Observation Stakeholder PerceptionsContent Knowledge Student Growth
Student Achievement
The TEM System Is:• A multi-measure
evaluation tool• A process for
instructional leadership and management
• A map for assigning teacher professional
development and support resources
3
40%
5%5%
35%
15%
Observation Stakeholder Perceptions
Content Knowledge Student Growth
Student Achievement
TEM Data Sources:• Observation (40%) – 605 trained, certified administrators conduct 4 – 6 observations for each teacher annually using the TEM rubric
• Stakeholder Perceptions (5%) – All schools administer the TRIPOD student survey 2 times during the school year
• Content Knowledge (5%) – Teachers select from a menu of options including completion of content-specific PD, port-folio of work, and observations by content specialists
Teacher Effectiveness Measure
Teacher Effectiveness Measure
4
40%
5%5%
35%
15%
Observation Stakeholder PerceptionsContent Knowledge Student GrowthStudent Achievement
TEM Data Sources:• Student Growth (35%) – The state of TN provides student growth scores (TVAAS) based on state standardized test results for individual teachers and schools
• Student Achievement (15%) – The state of TN provides a menu of options that teachers select from for other student-data based measures
5
Distribution of TEM Ratings and Raw Scores
TEM 1 TEM 2 TEM 3 TEM 4 TEM 50%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
2%
19%
39%
25%
15%
2011-12 TEM Profile Distribution
6
Distribution of Qualitative Data (Observations, Stakeholder Perceptions and Content Knowledge)
100 120 140 160 180 200 220 2400%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Distribution of Qualitative Scores by Tested/Non-Tested Status
Non-Tested Tested
7
TEM Qualitative and Quantitative Scores by Tested/Non-Tested Status
Challenge Clarify Care Consolidate Captivate Confer Control 0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
72%69%
67% 67%
59%
54%
48%
7 Cs Tripod Survey Results - District AveragePe
rcen
t in
Agre
emen
t
8