the state of social enterprise
DESCRIPTION
The State of Social Enterprise by Dr Alex Nicholls 10 January 2011. Not for reproduction without the author's consent.TRANSCRIPT
The State of Social EnterpriseThe State of Social Enterprise
Dr Alex Nicholls MBA
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP1
University Lecturer in Social EntrepreneurshipSaid Business School, University of Oxford
Fellow in ManagementHarris Manchester College, Oxford
*** Not for reproduction without the author's consent. ***
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper/presentation are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB), or its Board of Governors, or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper/presentation are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB), or its Board of Governors, or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.
*** Not for reproduction without the author's consent ****** Not for reproduction without the author's consent. ***
• Definitions• Context• Social enterprise typology• Social enterprise investment
OverviewOverview
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP2
DefinitionsDefinitions
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP3
A business with primarily social objectives whose surpluses are principally reinvested for
that purpose in the business or the community, rather than being driven by the
Social EnterpriseSocial Enterprise
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP4
community, rather than being driven by the need to maximise profit for shareholders and
owners
DTI (2002)DTI (2002)
Spectrum Of ActionSpectrum Of Action
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP5
CAF/Venturesome (2009)
• Purpose is social/environmental• Vehicle is business• Generate earned income• Not necessarily profitable
• Create blended value
Key CharacteristicsKey Characteristics
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP6
• Create blended value• Social + financial (accounting)
• Agnostic about legal form• Method not the means
• Strong market orientation• Performance measurement
Conceptualizing SEConceptualizing SE
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP7
Social Enterprise ModelsSocial Enterprise Models
• More efficient• Driven by competition
• More self reliant/independent• ‘Sustainable’?
• More scalable
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP8
• More scalable • Better access to capital
• More innovative• Hybrid synergies
• Investable
Social Enterprise ModelsSocial Enterprise Models
• Leverage public and private resources• Free up philanthropic funds/grants
• Respond to demand more quickly• Organisational mindset• Resource availability
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP9
• Resource availability
• Wider access to skilled personnel• Greater financial rigour• Reinvest revenues to capacity build
ContextContext
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP10
Social Sector EffectivenessSocial Sector Effectiveness
• Move towards more ‘efficient’ business models in social sector• For-profit subsidiary ventures• Cross sector partnerships/hybrids• Drive towards ‘sustainability’
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP11
• Drive towards ‘sustainability’• Better responsiveness
Sustainable BusinessSustainable Business
• Enhanced CSR• Triple Bottom Line strategies• Pressure to act as corporate ‘citizen’• Role in solving social problems• Role in social institution building
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP12
• Role in social institution building
• BoP opportunities
Reinventing GovernmentReinventing Government
• Increased privatisation of government and public services• Search for better quality/efficiency/legitimacy• Reduction in taxation• Formats:
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP13
• Formats:• Outsourcing contracts• Voucher schemes• PFIs/PPPs
New Resource StrategiesNew Resource Strategies
Strategy Variations Examples
Sale of products and services
Mission relatedNot linked to mission
Project Impact
Fees/cost recovery Membership feesLicensing fees
Fair Trade
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP14
Licensing fees
In-kind resources Pro bono goods and servicesVolunteers
CityYear
Partnerships With businessWith governmentWith local community
Eco-Clubes
Raising funds Special eventsAdditions to bills
Habitat for Humanity
• IFF survey (2006)• 55,000 social enterprises in UK• 2009 >60,000
• 5% of all businesses with employees• Combined turnover of £27bn
UK Social EnterpriseUK Social Enterprise
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP15
• Combined turnover of £27bn • Contribute £8.4bn p.a. to economy• 2010 >4000 Community Interest Companies (CICs)
• GEM SE survey (2006)• UK sample, 27,000 18-64 year olds• 3.2% of working population engage with SE (1.2 million)
• Mostly in start-ups (2.8%)
UK Social EnterpriseUK Social Enterprise
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP16
• Mostly in start-ups (2.8%)• Bias towards women (3.6%) v men (2.8%)• Strong ethnic minority bias
• Afro-Caribbeans 3 x more likely to be SEs than caucasians
• Some regional variation• London 4.7% of working population engage with SE
UK Social EnterpriseUK Social Enterprise
• SEC Report (2009)• Average annual turnover of £2.1m• Maximum of c £100m• 39% derive >50% of income from public sector contracts
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP17
contracts• Recession busting: 56% increased turnover during 2009
• 60% of new investment for growth• 26% lead by women (v 14% in all SMEs)
UK Social EnterpriseUK Social Enterprise
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP18
UK Government PolicyUK Government Policy
19 SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP20
Big SocietyBig Society
Government needs to open up public services to new providers like charities, social enterprises and private companies so we get more innovation, diversity and
Cameron (2010)Cameron (2010)
so we get more innovation, diversity and responsiveness to public need
21 SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP
Social Enterprise TypologySocial Enterprise Typology
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP22
SocialPrograms
+Enterprise
SocialPrograms
EnterpriseActivities
SocialPrograms
EnterpriseActivities
$
Social Enterprise Models
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP23
EnterpriseActivities
Embedded
Programs Activities
Integrated
Programs Activities
External
Alter (2006)
Employment Model
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP24
Embedded
Entrepreneur Support Model
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP25
EmbeddedIPO 2010 c$350m IPO 2007 c$450m
Market Intermediary Model
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP26
Embedded
Fee-For-Service Model
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP27
Embedded
Cooperative ModelCooperative Model
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP28
Embedded
Service Subsidization Model
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP29
Integrated
Organizational Support Model
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP30
External
Key Investment QuestionsKey Investment Questions
• Who is the customer?• Market characteristics• Economic model for social/environmental value creation• ‘Green Ocean’ opportunity?
• Business model• Business model• How are surpluses generated?• How are surpluses distributed?
• Legal form• Financial structure
• Risk and return• Timescale for growth/expansion/profitability
31
Social Enterprise InvestmentSocial Enterprise Investment
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP32
Impact Investing FieldsImpact Investing Fields
• Clean technology• Microfinance• Global health• Water• Housing
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP33
• Housing• BoP investments• > $1tr investment opportunity
The Investor UniverseThe Investor Universe
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP34
- 100% + 8%0%
Capital-protected Market-rate returnGrant-makers
- 15%
?
Social Social Investor MarketsInvestor Markets
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP35
Nicholls (2009)
Structured DealsStructured Deals
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP36
Monitor(2009)
Vodafone’s MVodafone’s M--PESA ProjectPESA Project
• M-PESA: mobile banking for Kenya’s poor• Vodafone subsidiary Safaricom signed almost 2m customers in the first year of operation
• DFID matched Vodafone’s investment of £1 million to pilot M-PESA in Kenya (as a grant)
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP37
to pilot M-PESA in Kenya (as a grant)• Without DFID support Vodafone could not have invested in the venture
• $38 million of mobile phone banking transactions (2009)
• 2,500 people signing up every day
Social Impact Bond ModelSocial Impact Bond Model
InvestorsInvestorsPublic Public SectorSector
Delivery Delivery AgencyAgency
Makes Payment Based Makes Payment Based On Defined OutcomesOn Defined Outcomes
Financial Returns Financial Returns Dependent On OutcomesDependent On Outcomes
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP38
Target Target PopulationPopulation
Service Service ProvidersProviders
Improved Social OutcomesImproved Social Outcomes
Reduced Public Sector CostsReduced Public Sector Costs
Wider Benefits To SocietyWider Benefits To Society
• 18th March 2010: launch of the first Social Impact Bond with the Ministry of Justice
• Pilot offers intensive support to 3,000 short-term prisoners in Peterborough Prison• Six year period, both inside prison and after release, to help them resettle into the community
Social Impact Bond PilotSocial Impact Bond Pilot
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP39
•to help them resettle into the community
• Working with SEs such as St Giles Trust• 5 million pound bond
• If SIB reduces re-offending by 7.5%+, investors will receive a share of the long term savings up to a maximum 13% return
QuestionsQuestions
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP40
QuestionsQuestions