El Grupo de Trabajo SONEX para el análisis de cuestiones relativas a la interoperabilidad de repositorios:interoperabilidad de repositorios:

resumen de actividades

Pablo de Castro, GrandIR – pcastro@grandir.com

Peter Burnhill, EDINA National Data Centre – p.burnhill@ed.ac.uk

Estructura de la presentación

• Cinco secciones con pausas intermedias para Q&A y discusión

1. Una breve historia del Grupo SONEX, con énfasis en la incorporación de contenidos a los repositorios

2. Algunos proyectos de interés relacionados con SONEX y financiados por el JISCpor el JISC

3. Cómo el modelo de análisis de SONEX se extiende a la gestión de datos de investigación – con referencias a algunos proyectos en curso

4. Cómo el modelo de análisis de SONEX se extiende a las componentes de servicio del proyecto UKRepositoryNet+

5. Cuestiones abiertas/Open issues- Cuál es el valor archivístico de la Copia Final de Autor?- Hacia la hegemonía de la Vía Dorada?- Datos suplementarios/supplementary files y más

http://sonexworkgroup.blogspot.com/

How it all started:

Institutional Repositories Workshop (IRW’09)

http://repinf.pbworks.com/Repository-handshake

SONEX are…

As of Nov'09 the workgroup coordinator Pablo de Castro changed affiliation from Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) to Carlos III University Madrid, and Richard Jones(Symplectic Ltd) became a member of the group in Apr'10 replacing Jim Downing.

How SONEX fits into the JISC Deposit Programme

SONEX: Scholarly Output Notification and Exchange

• The goal: populating (then) nearly-empty repositories - focus on research papers (the multi-authored, multi-institution default case study)

• The procedure: an international think-tank with own institutional activity in the area and international connections to running projects

- Identifying deposit opportunities as deposit use cases- The group philosophy: not a coding project (not even a - The group philosophy: not a coding project (not even a project) - "no power, no responsibility" - because of that we had influence and language

SONEX: Scholarly Output Notification and Exchange

• Dissemination and networking - a big workgroup objective:

- OR10, - DL.org, - COAR WG2…

The SONEX paper:

deposit-related interoperability in a nutshell

http://hdl.handle.net/10016/9257

A bit of archaeology: the deposit landscape

at SONEX start time

11‘A summary of ongoing deposit-related projects’, http://bit.ly/c6OCi5

SONEX usecase-based interop analysis

SONEX usecase scenario I: publisher-driven deposit

OA-RJ workflow PEER workflow

SONEX usecase scenario I: publisher-driven deposit

SONEX usecase scenario II: CRIS/IR integration

(from: “KE CRIS-OAR [publication metadata] interoperability project” presentation, CRIS2010 Aalborg, Denmark, June 2-5,

2010)

SONEX usecase scenario II: CRIS/IR integration

SONEX usecase scenario III: Funder-mandated deposit

• Meeting funder mandates

• Subject-based repositories as a potential document source

SONEX usecase scenario IV: Deposit via personal software

• Direct ingest from author’s desktop

• Strongly relying upon Sword-based workflow

(Potential) SONEX usecase scenario V: are IRs a proper target for research data deposit?

Summing up: Section 1 on SONEX work

• Began with interoperability deposit opportunity as the priority

• Take the multi-authored, multi-institution research paper as default

• Review existing deposit projects

• Develop use case analysis

• Key was think not have to do the work ourselves: think tank that helped form framwork and language

• JISC then acted to commission a set of deposit projects along SONEX identified deposit worklines

March 2010: JISC Deposit call released

JISC Deposit call projects: DepositMO

JISC Deposit call projects: RePosit

JISC Deposit call projects: JISC DURA

http://jisc-dura.blogspot.com/2010/08/ir-cris.html

JISC Deposit call projects: JISC DURA

http://www-library.ch.cam.ac.uk/open_access_publishing

JISC Deposit call projects: Kultivate

http://lanyrd.com/2011/kultivate-july-2011/sfpqw/

Measuring success of strategies to promote deposit

http://www.rsp.ac.uk/grow/measuring-success/

• Measuring success for particular deposit strategies: much harder than getting a general picture

• Specific questions should be asked to repository managers, such as:- was any given automated deposit strategy used for content ingest purposes?

- could an approximate amount of items thus ingested be estimated as a percentage of total item input?

And in the meantime, outside JISC Deposit programme…

http://grandirblog.blogspot.com.es/2012/03/creciente-adopcion-de-cerif-como.html

SHERPA RoMEO involved in CRIS

End of section 2: Deposit projects

SONEX Extension to Research Data Mgt

SONEX Extension to Research Data Mgt

• SONEX commissioned by the JISC to perform a similar analysis on RDM

• Same JISC programme architecture: the JISC MRD Programme

SONEX Extension to Research Data Mgt

What SONEX does for JISC MRD

• Reporting on meetings, activities, new approaches the SONEX way: with a focus on international connections and connecting the analysis to previous work

• Joint SONEX-Sword work for analysis of Dataset deposit use casesanalysis of Dataset deposit use cases

• Providing a conceptual framework to Research Data Management

• Examination of specific issues: are IRs suitable for research data storage and management?

What SONEX does for JISC MRD

What SONEX does for JISC MRD

A final reflection on RDM/Open Data and Open Access (are we wrt Open Data where OA was 10 yrs ago?)

OPEN DATA <> OPEN ACCESS(“shared” vs “repositories”, © PMR)

BUT:

- Berlin Declaration shows shared goals

- Same workteams on both - Same workteams on both arenas

- Open movements feed back each other

- Synergies seeked and needed

Activities around SUNCAT, Union Catalogue for Serials in UK

Published Serials (Journals etc)

Library as Custodian & Library as Customer

D-journals

Print journals

E-journals

OpenURL Router Usage for Articles

37

SUNCAT

UKRR / Keepers Registry PECAN / KB+

Licensing –Entitlements

Custodian –Stewardship

for Articles

‘Volume holdings’

Project to build infrastructure to support operation of repositories in UK

Academic

reader

researcher

UKPMC

Publisher

author(s)

editorreferee

teacherstudent

P.I.

journal

monographLicensed/tollgate access to

Publisher’s Final Copy(PFC)

Landscape: Actors, Agency & Relationships for Report, Deposit & Access

ResearchAward

Deposit of metadata/text of

Authors’ Final Copy(AFC)

DigitalLibrarymetrics

SubjectRepository

SWORD

EU

Eval

reader

ResearchOutcomes

UKPMC

HEI

Institution[OA mandate]

Library

CRIS

InstitutionalRepository

ARMA

Award reporting

Library

curation micro - services

Research ExcellenceFramework

metrics

stewardship budgets

NORA

UK Research

Funder[OA mandate]

HEFCE, SFC …

EU RCUKWellcome

Trust

CERIF

UKCoRR

EU

Publisher

author(s)

journal

monographPublisher’s Final Copy(PFC)

Library View (Without Repositories)

Publisher’s Platform

<DOI>

University

Library

Platform

Customer

Licensed/tollgate access

$

researcher

P.I.

Researcher View (Without Repositories)

ResearchAward reporting

Principal Investigator (PI) leads research team

Publisher

author(s)

journal

monographPublisher’s Final Copy(PFC)

University

reporting about Outcomes

Research Funders £

<AwardID>

<AwardID>

researcher

Publisher

author(s)P.I.

journal

monographPublisher’s Final Copy(PFC)

General Landscape (Without Repositories)

ResearchAward

Publisher’s Platform

University

Library

Award reporting about Outcomes

Platform

Customer

Research Funders

Licensed/tollgate access

$

researcher

Publisher

author(s)P.I.

journal

monographPublisher’s Final Copy(PFC)

Landscape With Green OA Repositories Added

ResearchAward

Deposit of metadata/text of

Authors’ Final Copy(AFC) Digital

Library

SubjectRepository

SWORD

Licensed/tollgate access

<DOI>

<DOI><AwardID>

ResearchOutcomes

HEI

Institution[OA mandate]

Library

InstitutionalRepository

Award reporting

Library

Custodian Customer

Research Funders[OA mandate]

HEFCE, SFC …

EU RCUKWellcome

Trust

CERIF

<AwardID>

<AwardID>

<AwardID>

Academiceditorreferee

teacherstudent

reader

researcher

Publisher

author(s)P.I.

journal

monographPublisher’s Final Copy(PFC)

Landscape: Actors, Agency & Relationships for Report, Deposit & Access

ResearchAward

Deposit of metadata/text of

Authors’ Final Copy(AFC) Digital

Library

SubjectRepository

SWORD

<DOI>reader

ResearchOutcomes

HEI

Institution[OA mandate]

Library

CRIS

InstitutionalRepository

Award reporting

Library

Custodian Customer

Research Funders[OA mandate]

HEFCE, SFC …

EU RCUKWellcome

Trust

CERIF

Licensed/tollgate access

<DOI>

PublishersAcademics

Reader

Author

P.I.

Teacher

Institutional

Repository

Subject

Repository

Monograph

JournalArticle

Open Open AccesAcces

ss

A Simpler View of Repository Landscape

Institution

sFunders

Faculty

ResearchAwards

Funders

Repository

CRIS

Library

ss

Research Research InformatioInformatio

n n ManagemManagem

entent

Research Grant Office

High-Level Plan with Key Deliverables

WP3: Scope Components: Tools & Services

WP1: Project Management & Reporting

Jan2011 2012

Oct MarApr Jul2013JanOctAug

WP2a: Scope Production Environment

WP2b: Develop and Maintain Production Environment

JISC Programme Outputs & Dependencies (Scholarly Comms, Research Information Management, etc.)

Core Project Documents

Scoping Study

Initial Production Environment (PE) & Description Production Environment

Component Catalogue Blueprint Processes

Major Review Checkpoint

Final Report

Re-plan Re-plan

Service Desk

Checkpoint Checkpoint

JISC-funded Project Plan to Build an Infrastructure

Component Lifecycle Model & Processes for Embedding

WP4: Foster Partnerships for Service Components

WP6: SDPR*

WP7: Service Sustainability

Consumers & Service Providers

WP5b: Develop Shared Service Suite Phase 2Phase 2 Shortlist

Gap analysis & use cases

*SDPR = Service Development Process Re-engineering

Phase 1 Components in PE

Market Analysis Sustainability Options Component Business Cases Sustainability Plan

Stakeholder Analysis & Engagement Strategy

Communications Plan

Partnership Arrangements Phase 2Partnership Arrangements Phase 1

Phase 2 Components in PE

WP5a: Develop Service Suite Phase 1Phase 1 Shortlist

Institutional view

� Repository managers

� Research administrators (on research reporting)

� Researchers??

Research funders

Stakeholder Engagement

Research funders

� RCUK, Wellcome Trust

Publishers

� Green and Gold

Validated the Repository Landscape

� Proved initial understanding correct

� Reassurance that there were no gaps in understanding or landscape mapping

How to take this forward ?

� Concentrate on use cases based on functional areas,

Stakeholder Analysis: what we learned

� Concentrate on use cases based on functional areas, eg publisher deposits, PIs, IR manager benchmarks, funder requires statistics

Needed to sketch the vision of what can be provided

� in order to extract user requirements within and beyond what is done by existing components in the functional areas

Components for Wave 1Classification and RecommendationsClassification and Recommendations

12 Components from (6) Owners: by functional area

ROAR

University of Southampton

OpenDOAR

University of Nottingham

RoMEO

Juliet

OpenDepot ORI

IRS IRUS-UK

REPUKInnovation

UKOLN

CORE

RJ Broker

EDINA

IRS

MIMAS

IRUS-UK

NAMES2

CORELinked

data/mobile

Open University

Aggregation, Text mining & Search

Benchmarking, Statistics and Report

Constructing Relevant Registries

Deposit Tools

Enhancing Metadata Quality

Summary of Components by Functional Area

RoMEO

Juliet

OpenDepot

IRS

IRUS-UK

REPUK

CORE

Aggregated set of metadata for development

Search, aggregation, full-text mining for OA repositories

Search, aggregation, data-mining for all IRs

Publisher policies on OA deposit

Research funders’ policies on OA

Redirect facility to OA IRs, and default OA repository

Centralised service for collection of OA

A: Aggregation, Text mining & Search

B: Benchmarking, Statistics and Report

D: Deposit Tools

ROAR

RJBroker

OpenDOAR

Depot

ORI

IRUS-UK

NAMES2

and default OA repository

M2M direct for multi-authored works to OA repository(ies)

Authoritative, manually curated registry of OA repositories, combined with harvested metadata

Registry of OA repositories compiled with statistics in mind

Organisation based with information on repositories

Centralised service for collection of OA usage statistics

Naming Authority for the UK assigning identifiers to organisations and individuals engaged in research

C: Creating Relevant Registries

E: Enhancing Metadata Quality

The purposes and functions of OpenDepot.org are two-fold:

1. a repository functionto ensure that all researchers can do Open Access

– whether or not they belong to an institution with a repository – whether or not they belong to an institution with a repository

2 a discovery/re-direct functionto help populate Institutional Repositories (IRs)

The Repository Junction Broker is used in OpenDepot.org for re-directand has been developed as separate middleware

Sketch of RepositoryNet Infrastructure & Components

Service Support

Funders’Repositories

SubjectRepositories

InstitutionalRepositories

consumers

Service Directory

* Hosted by universities

Service Desk Service Support

RepositoryNet Production Environment

Hosted by RepNet

…

… curationmicro-servicesInnovation

Zone

Remote*

Rapid

Innov.

/

…

hacks

…

Service Directory

Service components

More info on Sonex: http://sonexworkgroup.blogspot.com/

Pablo de Castro, GrandIR – pcastro@grandir.com

Peter Burnhill, EDINA National Data Centre – p.burnhill@ed.ac.uk

Gracias!