the role of ppps in scaling up financial flows in the post ... · the role of ppps in scaling up...
TRANSCRIPT
The role of PPPs in scaling up financial flows in the post-Kyoto regime !Public Private Partnerships: A Focus on Energy Infrastructures and Sustainable Growth, Ca’ Foscari University, 9 May 2014 !
Giulia Galluccio
Climate finance needs • Resources to address climate change need to be scaled up considerably
over the next few decades both in developed and developing countries (medium evidence, high agreement). IPCC WGIII AR5
• Interna3onal financial support pledges from COP15 to COP 19: – Every two years statements on plans for delivering USD 100 billion /year by
2020 to developing countries – Pledges funds are to be new, addi3onal to previous flow, and may come from
a wide variety of sources, public and private, bilateral and mul3lateral, & alterna3ve sources
• The total climate finance currently flowing to developing countries is es3mated to be between 39 to 120 billion USD per year
• 70-‐100 billion USD could annually be needed over the next 40 years to finance adapta3on to the inevitable impacts of climate change in developing countries
Future investment needs to stabilize CO2
Figure SPM.9. WGIII AR5
PPPs and climate change (I)
• Innova3ve sources of finance will be needed, moving beyond carbon trading schemes…
• The Public-‐Private partnership (PPP) model have already been used as a risk sharing structure to bring private funds on the table in several contexts would usually not have being presented
• Only limited efforts have been made to inves3gate exis3ng business models capable to aYract the private sector investment in climate mi3ga3on and adapta3on projects.
PPPs and climate change (II) • The analysis performed over two decades panel data confirms
the interna3onal climate agreements among the key drivers of PPP energy investments in developing countries
• On the contrary PPP investments in water and transport infrastructures appeared not s3mulated by the Kyoto Protocol
• We analysed a representa3ve sample of 4324 PPP projects in low-‐ and middle-‐income countries in three main sectors (WB PPIAF Project Database hYp://ppi.worldbank.org/)
Analysis of exis3ng PPPs
! 61!
Figure'11'Total'PPPs'sample'by'sector'''
a) number of new projects b. total investments commitments
Figure'12'Energy'PPPs'investment'commitments''
a. development status b. sub-sctors
Figure'13'PPP'investments'in'electricity'by'subsector'
Energy'54%'Transport'
30%'
Water'and'sewerage'
16%'
Source:'PPI'Database,'World'Bank'and'PPIAF'
Energy'63%'
Transport'30%'
Water'and'sewerage'
7%'
Source:'PPI'Database,'World'Bank'and'PPIAF'
Pipeline'7%'
Financial'Closure'93%'
Source:'PPI'Database,'World'Bank'and'PPIAF'
Electricity))
89%)
Natural)Gas)11%)
Source:)PPI)Database,)World)Bank)and)PPIAF)
Electricity)distribu.on)
10%)
Electricity)distribu.on,)genera.on,)
and)transmission)
7%)Electricity)transmission)
4%)
Electricity)genera.on)
79%)
The energy case
• Electricity genera3on and renewable energy sectors confirm their great poten3al in terms of capacity to aYract private finance via PPPs
• Around 1500 new facili3es in the 2 decades and 570GW installed capacity (US$520 billion) of which 150 GW in renewable energy projects (US$190 billion)
! 63!
Looking at the energy sources, the growth of renewable energy generation,
highlighted by IEA at global level, is also confirmed by the present study of PPP
investments.
Total investments in renewable energy PPP projects, so far have reached the
amount of 190 billion US$ (over 135 billion US$ when including only the
projects reaching the financial closure), and all the new projects in the pipeline
(totalling around 54.7 US$ billion) are related to the renewable energy sector.
In terms of installed capacity, the renewable sector cover the 26% of the total
projected50 installed capacity (150GW over 570GW) (Figure 16).
Figure'16'Installed'capacity'of'PPP'energy'generation'projects'
The impact of the 352 pipeline projects on the renewables share, is also shown by
Figure 17a. When including the latest projects still under development, the share
of renewable energy increase of the 8%.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!50!We! refer! to! projected! installed! capacity!when! including! the! 352!projects!still!in!the!pipeline.!
!"!!!!
!100!!
!200!!
!300!!
!400!!
!500!!
!600!!
1990! 1991! 1992! 1993! 1994! 1995! 1996! 1997! 1998! 1999! 2000! 2001! 2002! 2003! 2004! 2005! 2006! 2007! 2008! 2009! 2010! 2011!
GW#
Renewable!energy!
Non"renewable!energy!
Shib towards renewable PPPs
• PPPs are able to capture the progressive shib towards low-‐carbon sources of energy in developing na3ons
! 64!
Figure'17'Electricity'generation'investments'in'PPPs'by'energy'source'
a) including pipeline projects b) excluding pipeline projects
Figure 18 again provides a meaningful overview of the past and future energy
investments trends in the electricity generation segment both in the renewable and
non-renewable sector as extracted from our selected sample of projects. When
including the amount of investments coming from the pipeline projects (dotted
line), for the first time in the period, PPPs investments in renewable energy
generation exceed those in the fossil fuels energy sectors, thus showing the
evidence of a progressive switch toward low-carbon sources of energy.
Figure' 18' Renewable' and' nonIrenewable' PPP' energy' projects' in' the' electricity' generation'segment'(total'annual'investment'commitments'Iincluding'pipeline)'
Renewable(37%(
Coal(38%(
Diesel(10%(
Natural(gas(15%(
Nuclear(0%(
Renewable(29%(
Coal(43%(
Diesel(11%(
Natural(gas(17%(
Nuclear(0%(
!"!!!!
!10,000!!
!20,000!!
!30,000!!
!40,000!!
!50,000!!
!60,000!!
!70,000!!
!80,000!!
!90,000!!
1990!1991!1992!1993!1994!1995!1996!1997!1998!1999!2000!2001!2002!2003!2004!2005!2006!2007!2008!2009!2010!2011!
Coon
stan
t''2011'US$'(m
illion)'
Non"renewable!
Renewable!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Pipeline!
PPPs and the carbon market
• We found that the business model has been tested in the carbon market (10,9GW installed as CDM)
! 71!
Figure'26'PPP'and'CDM'projects'shares'
a) installed capacity b) investment commitments
Figure'27'Installed'capacity'of'PPP'and'CDM'projects'in'renewable'energy'in'the'period'2005I2011'
Recent literature (Vagliasindi 2012) has worked on the hypothesis that developing
countries are more likely to attract more investment in renewable based
generation after the entry into force of the Kyoto Protocol. We extended the
analysis including the more recent data from the PPI database and using our
selected sample of PPPs. We assessed the significance of differences between
PPPs volume of investments in electricity generation (and in the segment
renewable energy) prior and after 2005 using the statistical t-test and comparing
the means of the two samples.
CDM$7%$
Non*CDM$93%$
CDM$14%$
Non+CDM$86%$
!"!!!!
!20!!
!40!!
!60!!
!80!!
!100!!
!120!!
2005! 2006! 2007! 2008! 2009! 2010! 2011!
!!
Non"CDM!
CDM!
CDM Non-CDM
PPPs and innova3on
• High-‐tech projects: PPP model demonstrates ability to overcome financial and technological barriers and to aYract private finance in high-‐tech climate related projects : – CC Mi3ga3on: Ouarzazate Concentrated Solar Power Sta3on. A complex risk sharing structure involving concessional finance
– CC Adapta3on: SMART Tunnel in Kuala Lumpur. An innova3ve solu3on for climate disaster risk reduc3on
• Behavioural change and new business models: water PPPs give evidence of the unlocked poten3al of this sector in achieving CC adapta3on co-‐benefits: Metro Manila water concessions, Urban Water concessions in Cochabamba.
Conclusions
• Mainstreaming climate change into PPPs – The PPP model is already part of the adopted solu3on when referring to
infrastructure investments. In an ideal context, climate change issues should therefore, be simply mainstreamed in investment planning…but avoiding to lose the capacity to aYract financial resources locked for the climate agenda.
• IntegraDon of climate and PPP pracDces – More integra3on among the climate and PPP prac3ces would be desirable.
There is small emphasis on the contribu3on that PPPs can provide to CC policies from both sides.
• ImplementaDon of databases – A beYer integra3on of databases, and the crea3on of a specific climate PPPs
focus would help future research and dissemina3on of lessons learned. • Ad-‐hoc climate change PPPs
– Ad hoc sector oriented climate change PPPs promo3on should be adopted by governments and PPPs focal points. NAPs or NAMAs can be the right place for a PPPs porholio defini3on
Thank you
Ouarzazate CSP Sta3on
• A MDBs climate PPP project • Main features:
– 25-‐years BOOT (financial closure Nov. 2012) – One of the largest CSP plants (first phase 160MW) – Es3mated avoidance of 240,000 tCO2 per year – One of the first Climate Investment Fund (CTF) projects – It involves US$900 Mln of concessional finance provided by 7 lenders
Ouarzazate CSP Sta3on
• A good example of: – a complex risk sharing and transfer structure – a well coordinated public procurement phase
SMART Tunnel in Kuala Lumpur
• Main features: – 40-‐years BOT (financial closure 2003) – The tunnel operates as toll road or water tunnel – Bri3sh Construc3on Industry Award in 2008 and the UN Habitat Scroll of Honour Award in 2011
• 2 main objec3ves: – mi3gate the impact of seasonal flash floods – relieve the city of the traffic conges3on
• A good example on how the user-‐fee PPP business model can serve the adapta3on agenda
• It addresses the need to design new infrastructural solu3ons to mi3gate adverse CC impacts
SMART Tunnel in Kuala Lumpur (2)
• It demonstrates the capacity to aYract private capital and ingenuity in high-‐tech investments and in long-‐las3ng partnership with the public
• Clear objec3ves led to a successful project – It paved the way for the defini3on of a PPP na3onal framework under the 9Th Malaysian Development Plan
– Infrastructure improvement and upgrading through PPPs are part of the Malaysian plan to reduce the carbon footprint of Malaysian ci3es in the second decades of this century
Water PPPs
• Water PPPs are among the first PPP projects that have been developed in developing countries to provide water services and improve access to water. Despite the great importance of the water sector in the climate change context the analysis of PPP panel data showed that water PPPs are not driven by the climate global agenda.
• The analysis of best and worst case studies gave evidence of the unlocked poten3al of this sector in achieving CC adapta3on co-‐benefits – Metro Manila water concessions – Urban Water concessions in Cochabamba
Metro Manila Water Concessions
• The concessions encountered financial difficul3es, the strong coopera3on and public commitment to clear contractual targets were crucial – Extension of water services and reduc3on of water losses – 13% of water losses in East Manila and water connec3ons increased of 48% since 2006 in West Manila
• Water sufficiency is a strategic priority of the Philippines Na3onal Climate Change Ac3on Plan 2011-‐2028
• Concessionaires are now working with US NCAR to integrate CC risks and CC adapta3on analysis into investment planning
Urban water concessions in Cochabamba
• The 40-‐years Agua del Tunari ROT concession survived only 7 months with a drama3c escala3on of events in 2000
• Main failure components: – Inadequate ins3tu3onal capacity in managing the en3re PPP process
• Failed compe33ve bidding, direct nego3a3on – Lack of communica3on with all stakeholder par3es – Too ambi3ous objec3ves
• Water services rehab and Misicuni dam construc3on
Urban water concessions in Cochabamba today
• The new Agua para Todos PPP is successfully opera3ng with a Public Private Community Partnership since 2005 – Aber 5 years of implementa3on of the partnership 25,000 people had access to modern water services.
– Agua para Todos won the 2005 SEED Award – All the previous failure components were successfully addressed