the role of positive leadership in times of crisis
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Click to edit Master header style
Greece HR Conference
Kim Cameron
Ross School of Business
June 2014
The Role of Positive Leadership in Times of
Crisis
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
2 2
Criteria for Content
•Empirical foundation – Validity
•Theoretical grounding – Explanation
•Successful application - Utility
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
3
| | | Negative Deviance Normal Positive Deviance
Individual:
Physiological Illness Health Vitality
Psychological Illness Health Flow
Organizational:
Economics Unprofitable Profitable Generous
Effectiveness Ineffective Effective Excellent
Efficiency Inefficient Efficient Extraordinary
Quality Error-prone Reliable Perfect
Ethics Unethical Ethical Benevolent
Relationships Harmful Helpful Honoring
Adaptation Threat-rigidity Coping Flourishing
Deficit gaps Abundance gaps
SOURCE: Cameron, 2003.
A Deviance Continuum
difficult,
challenging, &
demanding; not
soft and squishy
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
4
Explanation
Focusing on
Abundance
Gaps
The
Heliotropic
Effect
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
5
Research Illustrating Heliotropism
• The Pygmalion Effect
• Positive Emotions
• Positive Imagery
• Groups of Gratitude, Positive, Approach Goals
Versus Ingratitude, Negative, Avoidance Goals
• Positive Relationships
• Positive Energy
• Strengths Orientation
SOURCES: See Cameron & Lavine, 2006; Cameron, 2007 for references
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
6
Effects of Abundance - Individuals
Comparisons between individuals characterized by the right-hand factor compared to the left-hand factor have shown dramatic differences:
Gratitude Journal versus Frustration Journal Capturing the Best versus Capturing the Worst Virtuous condition versus Non-virtuous condition
– more antibodies after vaccines
– stronger genetic expression
– more mental alertness, acute and long lasting memory, and faster learning
– Enhanced filtration, bodily fluid exchange, energy efficiency, coherence
– more inquisitiveness, creativity, and exploration
– higher levels of productivity and quality performance
– recovery from disease, and avoidance of depression after spouse loss
SOURCES: See Cameron & Lavine, 2006; Cameron, 2007 for references
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
7
Fostering Gratitude
(1) Gratitude Journal
(2) Gratitude Visit or Letter
(3) Gratitude Cards
(4) Positively Embarrass
(5) Letter to Families
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
8
Emotions and Health
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
9
Positivity and Brain Functioning
Mental acuity is
greater when
positive events
are imagined
compared to
negative events.
Sharot, Riccardi, Raio & Phelps (2007) Nature 450, 102-105
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
10
Vagus Nerve and Positivity
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
SOURCE: Cohn & Fredrickson, 2011
Engendered positive emotions
enhance vagal nerve functioning
and, consequently, long-term
wellness.
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
11
Positive Relationships
• The presence of positive relationships predict:
– Recovery from surgery
– Incidence of prostate cancer
– Immunity to colds and flu viruses
– Incidence of heart attacks
– Ability to cope with stress (oxytocins)
– Worker satisfaction and productivity
– Life expectancy
• Due to hormonal, cardiovascular, and immunity
responses in the body.
SOURCE: Heaphy & Dutton, 2007; Dutton & Ragins, 2007
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
An Explanation for Relationship Effects
• Goals of entering freshmen (Crocker)
• Kidney dialysis patients (Brown)
• Borders
• Predicting change in hospitals (Grant)
• 99,000 people die of healthcare acquired infections each year. That translates into 271 people per day or a Boeing 767 airliner
crashing and killing all on board every day. MRSA -- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus -- alone is estimated to kill
around 19,000 people annually in the United States.
Hand hygiene
prevents you
from catching
diseases.
Hand hygiene
prevents
patients from
catching
diseases.
0% increase 33%
increase
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
Maps of Organizations
13
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
Alternative Reporting Relationships
• Information
– Who gives information to whom?
– Who gets information from whom?
• Influence
– Who influences whom?
– Who is influenced by whom?
• Energy
– Who energizes whom?
– Who is energized by whom?
Traditionally,
leadership =
influence
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
Density in Energy Networks
Energizing De-energizing
Density = 69% Density = 6%
ANALYSIS: Baker, 3/10/2010 15
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
16
Positive Energizers SOURCE: Baker, 2003.
• Those who positively energize others are higher
performers. Position in the energy network is four times
the predictor of performance compared to position in
informational or influence networks.
• Positive energizers tend to enhance the work of others.
People who interact with or are connected to energizers
also perform better.
• High performing firms had three times as many positive
energizing networks than low performing firms.
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved 17
Impact of Positive Energy on Individuals
Positive
Energy
of the
Unit
Leader
p < .001
p < .001
p < .001
p < .001
p < .01
Job Satisfaction
Well-Being
Engagement
Enrichment of
Families
Performance SOURCE: Owens, Baker, & Cameron, 2010
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved 18
Impact of Positive Energy on Units
Positive
Energy
of the
Unit
Leader
p < .001
p < .001
p < .001
p < .01
Cohesion
Experimentation
/Innovation
Team Learning
Orientation
Performance
SOURCE: Owens, Baker, & Cameron, 2010
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
Attributes of Positive Energizers
Energizers
1. They connect with others as people
2. They solve problems
3. They see opportunities
4. They fully engage in conversations & are heedful
5. They are trustworthy, have integrity, & are dependable
6. They express gratitude & humility
7. They use abundance language
8. They smile
9. They are genuine & authentic
10.They help others flourish
De-Energizers
1. They don’t show concern for those around them
2. They create problems
3. They mainly see roadblocks & have criticisms
4. They don’t create opportunities for others to be valued
5. They often don’t come through on commitments
6. They are often inflexible in their thinking
7. They just get louder when people don’t listen
8. They seldom smile
9. They are superficial & insincere
10. They ensure that they get credit
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
20
Why Do Negative Factors Get Our Attention?
A systematic bias exists in people that shows that the occurrence of negative factors are more powerful than positive factors—“Bad is stronger than good.” SOURCE: Baumeister, et al. 2001
• People are more affected by one traumatic or negative event than by one positive or happy event.
• People are more affected emotionally and do more mental work from a single negative piece of feedback than from a single positive piece of feedback.
• Evolutionary theory suggests why: If people ignore negative information, it could be dangerous. If they ignore positive feedback, it only causes regret.
• Therefore, it is not surprising that negative phenomena get more attention than positive phenomena. It takes conscious effort to focus on abundance.
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
How About Organizations?
• Getting a group of positive people together does not
make for a positive organization.
• Organizational dynamics make it much more
complex to translate individual outcomes into
collective outcomes.
• Is there any evidence that positive dynamics can
affect organizational performance?
21
Abundance in Organizations
Click to edit Master header style
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
23
Some Organizational Findings
• Communication patterns in 60 organizations
• Seven matched organizations within a parent corporation
• Intervention studies aimed at an abundance culture change
• Public and private companies in 16 industries
• The airline industry after 9-11
• Financial services performance
• Health care organizations
• Conclusion: An abundance approach and implementing
organizational virtuousness is significantly and positively
related to effectiveness (e.g., profitability, productivity,
quality, innovation, customer satisfaction, employee
retention).
© Kim Cameron, University of Michigan
© 2014 • Kim Cameron and The University of Michigan • All Rights Reserved
Some Additional Resources
centerforpos.com
24