The Road Ahead in TexasChallenges & Opportunities in the P/C Insurance Industry for 2011 & Beyond

48th Annual Joe Vincent Management SeminarAustin, TX

January 31, 2011

Download at www.iii.org/presentationsRobert P. Hartwig, Ph.D., CPCU, President & Economist

Insurance Information Institute 110 William Street New York, NY 10038Tel: 212.346.5520 Cell: 917.453.1885 bobh@iii.org www.iii.org

2

Presentation Outline

Insurance Industry Financial Overview & Outlook Profitability Premium Growth Capital & Capacity Underwriting Performance: Commercial & Personal Lines Financial/Investment Review & Outlook

Financial Strength Overview

Texas Overview: Growth and Profitability Analysis

Tort System Review: Overview and Causes for Concern

Exposure Analysis: Where Will Growth Come from in the Aftermath of the Great Recession?” Crisis-Driven Exposure Issues: Personal & Commercial Lines Growth in the Post-Crisis World

Catastrophe Loss Review

3

P/C Insurance Industry Financial Overview

Profit Recovery ContinuesEarly Stage Growth Begins

P/C Net Income After Taxes1991–2010:Q3 ($ Millions)

$1

4,1

78

$5

,84

0

$1

9,3

16

$1

0,8

70

$2

0,5

98

$2

4,4

04 $

36

,81

9

$3

0,7

73

$2

1,8

65

$3

,04

6

$3

0,0

29

$6

2,4

96

$3

,04

3

$2

6,7

00

$2

8,3

11

-$6,970

$6

5,7

77

$4

4,1

55

$2

0,5

59

$3

8,5

01

-$10,000

$0

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

$60,000

$70,000

$80,000

91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10:Q3

2005 ROE*= 9.6% 2006 ROE = 12.7% 2007 ROE = 10.9% 2008 ROE = 0.3% 2009 ROAS1 = 5.8% 2010:Q3 ROAS = 6.7%

P-C Industry 2010:Q3 profits were$26.7B vs.$16.4B in 2009:Q3,

due mainly to $4.4B in realized capital gains vs. -$9.6B in previous

realized capital losses

* ROE figures are GAAP; 1Return on avg. surplus. Excluding Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers yields a 7.7% ROAS for 2010:Q3 and 4.6% for 2009. 2009:Q3 net income was $29.8 billion excluding M&FG.Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute

5

ROE: Property/Casualty Insurance,1987–2010E*

* Excludes Mortgage & Financial Guarantee in 2008 - 2010.Sources: ISO, Fortune; Insurance Information Institute figure for 2010 is actual through 2010:Q3.

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10E

P/C Profitability Is Both by Cyclicality and Ordinary Volatile

Hugo

Andrew

Northridge

Lowest CAT Losses in 15 Years

Sept. 11

Katrina, Rita, Wilma

4 Hurricanes

Financial Crisis*

(Percent)

A 100 Combined Ratio Isn’t What ItOnce Was: Investment Impact on ROEs

Combined Ratio / ROE

* 2009 and 2010:Q3 figures are return on average statutory surplus. 2008, 2009 and 2010:H1figures exclude mortgage and financial guaranty insurersSource: Insurance Information Institute from A.M. Best and ISO data.

97.5

100.6 100.1 100.7

92.6

99.5 99.7101.0

7.7%7.3%

9.6%

15.9%

14.3%

12.7%

4.4%

8.9%

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

1978 1979 2003 2005 2006 2008* 2009* 2010:Q3*0%

3%

6%

9%

12%

15%

18%

Combined Ratio ROE*

Combined Ratios Must Be Lower in Today’s DepressedInvestment Environment to Generate Risk Appropriate ROEs

A combined ratio of about 100 generated ~7.5% ROE in 2009/10,

10% in 2005 and 16% in 1979

P/C Premium Growth Cycles

8

Cyclicality is Driven Primarily by the Industry’s Underwriting

Cycle, Not the Economy

9

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0910

F

Soft Market Persisted in 2010 but May Be Easing: Relief in 2011?

(Percent)1975-78 1984-87 2000-03

Shaded areas denote “hard market” periodsSources: A.M. Best (historical and forecast), ISO, Insurance Information Institute.

Net Written Premiums Fell 0.7% in 2007 (First Decline Since 1943) by 2.0% in 2008, and 4.2% in 2009, the First 3-Year Decline Since 1930-33.

NWP was up 0.8% through 10:Q3 vs. -4.5% through 09:Q3

10

P/C Net Premiums Written: % Change, Quarter vs. Year-Prior Quarter

Sources: ISO, Insurance Information Institute.

Finally! Back-to-back quarters of net written premium growth(vs. the same quarter, prior year)

10.2

%15

.1%

16.8

%16

.7%

12.5

%10

.1%

9.7%

7.8%

7.2%

5.6%

2.9%

5.5%

-4.6

%-4

.1%

-5.8

%-1

.6%

10.3

%10

.2% 13

.4%

6.6%

-1.6

%2.

1%0.

0%-1

.9%

0.5%

-1.8

%-0

.7%

-4.4

%-3

.7%

-5.3

%-5

.2%

-1.4

%-1

.3%

1.3% 2.

3%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

2002

:Q1

2002

:Q2

2002

:Q3

2002

:Q4

2003

:Q1

2003

:Q2

2003

:Q3

2003

:Q4

2004

:Q1

2004

:Q2

2004

:Q3

2004

:Q4

2005

:Q1

2005

:Q2

2005

:Q3

2005

:Q4

2006

:Q1

2006

:Q2

2006

:Q3

2006

:Q4

2007

:Q1

2007

:Q2

2007

:Q3

2007

:Q4

2008

:Q1

2008

:Q2

2008

:Q3

2008

:Q4

2009

:Q1

2009

:Q2

2009

:Q3

2009

:Q4

2010

:Q1

2010

:Q2

2010

:Q3

The long-awaited uptick:

mainly personal lines

11

Monthly Change* in Auto Insurance Prices, 1991–2010*

*Percentage change from same month in prior year; through December 2010; seasonally adjustedNote: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institutes.

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10

Cyclical peaks in PP Auto tend to occur

approximately every 10 years (early 1990s, early

2000s and likely the early 2010s)

“Hard” markets tend to occur

during recessionary

periods

A pricing peak may be occurring

Dec. 2010 change fell

to 4.4% from 5.4%

in Nov.

12

Average Premium forHome Insurance Policies**

* Insurance Information Institute Estimates/Forecasts **Excludes state-run insurers.Source: NAIC, Insurance Information Institute estimates 2009-2010 based on CPI and other data.

$508$536

$593

$668

$822$791 $799 $807$804

$764

$729

$500

$550

$600

$650

$700

$750

$800

$850

$900

$950

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09* 10*

Consumer efforts to economize (increased deductibles, more shopping, etc.) and

adverse exposure trends are depressing the average homeowners insurance premium

13

Average Commercial Rate Change,All Lines, (1Q:2004–3Q:2010)

-3.2

%

-5.9

%

-7.0

%

-9.4

%

-9.7

% -8.2

%

-4.6

%

-2.7

%

-3.0

%

-5.3

%

-9.6

%

-11

.3%

-11

.8%

-13

.3%

-12

.0%

-13

.5%

-12

.9% -1

1.0

%

-6.4

% -5.1

%

-4.9

%

-5.8

%

-5.6

%

-5.3

%

-6.4

% -5.2

%

-0.1

%

-16%

-14%

-12%

-10%

-8%

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

1Q

04

2Q

04

3Q

04

4Q

04

1Q

05

2Q

05

3Q

05

4Q

05

1Q

06

2Q

06

3Q

06

4Q

06

1Q

07

2Q

07

3Q

07

4Q

07

1Q

08

2Q

08

3Q

08

4Q

08

1Q

09

2Q

09

3Q

09

4Q

09

1Q

10

2Q

10

3Q

10

Source: Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers; Insurance Information Institute

KRW Effect

Magnitude of Price Declines Shrank

During Crisis, Reflecting Shrinking

Capital, Reduced Investment Gains,

Deteriorating Underwriting

Performance, Higher Cat Losses and

Costlier Reinsurance

(Percent)

Market Remains Soft as Capital Restored and

Underwriting Losses Remain Modest

14

Change in Commercial Rate Renewals, by Account Size: 1999:Q4 to 2010:Q3

Source: Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers; Insurance Information Institute.

Percentage Change (%)

Peak = 2001:Q4 +28.5%

Trough = 2007:Q3 -13.6%

Pricing Turned Negative in Early

2004 and Has Been Negative

Ever Since KRW Effect

Market has Been Soft for 6+ years and Remains Soft as Capital is Restored and

Underwriting Losses Remain Modest

17

Net Written Premium Growth by Segment: 2008-2011F

-0.1%

-9.4%

2.8%

-2.0%

2.5%

0.3%

-3.1%

-0.1%

-12%

-10%

-8%

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

Personal Lines Commercial Lines

2008 2009E 2010P 2011F

Rate and exposure are more favorable in personal lines, whereas a prolonged soft market and sluggish recovery from the recession

weigh on commercial lines.

Personal lines growth resumed in 2010 and will continue in 2011, while commercial lines contracted

again in 2010 and but will stabilize in 2011

Sources: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute.

Capital/PolicyholderSurplus (US)

18

Total Surplus Exhibits Little Cyclicality, While Surplus Leverage

Ratios Influence Cycle

20

Policyholder Surplus, 2006:Q4–2010:Q3

Sources: ISO, A.M .Best.

($ Billions)

$487.1$496.6

$512.8$521.8

$478.5

$455.6

$437.1

$463.0

$490.8

$511.5

$540.7$530.5

$544.8

$505.0$515.6$517.9

$420

$440

$460

$480

$500

$520

$540

$560

06:Q4 07:Q1 07:Q2 07:Q3 07:Q4 08:Q1 08:Q2 08:Q3 08:Q4 09:Q1 09:Q2 09:Q3 09:Q4 10:Q1 10:Q2 10:Q3

2007:Q3Previous Surplus Peak

Quarterly Surplus Changes Since 2007:Q3 Peak

09:Q1: -$84.7B (-16.2%) 09:Q2: -$58.8B (-11.2%)09:Q3: -$31.0B (-5.9%)09:Q4: -$10.3B (-2.0%)

10:Q1: +$18.9B (+3.6%)10:Q2: +$8.7B (+1.7%)10:Q3: +$23.0B (+4.4%)

Surplus set a new record in 2010:Q3*

*Includes $22.5B of paid-in capital from a holding company parent for one insurer’s investment in a non-insurance business in early 2010.

The Industry now has $1 of surplus for every $0.77 of

NPW—the strongest claims-paying status in its history.

Investment Performance

27

Investments Cycles Also Influence P/C Insurer Profitability

Property/Casualty Insurance Industry Investment Gain: 1994–2010:Q31

$35.4

$42.8$47.2

$52.3

$44.4

$36.0

$45.3$48.9

$59.4$55.7

$64.0

$31.7

$39.0 $39.5

$58.0

$51.9$56.9

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05* 06 07 08 09 10:Q3In 2008, Investment Gains Fell by 50% Due to Lower Yields and

Nearly $20B of Realized Capital Losses 2009 Saw Smaller Realized Capital Losses But Declining Investment Income

Investment Gains Recovered Significantly in 20101 Investment gains consist primarily of interest, stock dividends and realized capital gains and losses.* 2005 figure includes special one-time dividend of $3.2B.Sources: ISO; Insurance Information Institute.

($ Billions) 2009:Q3 gain was $29.3B

Investment gains in 2010 are on track to be their best since 2007

29

P/C Insurer Net Realized Capital Gains, 1990-2010:Q3

Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute.

$2.8

8

$4.8

1 $9.8

9

$9.8

2

$10.

81 $18.

02

$13.

02

$16.

21

$6.6

3

-$1.

21

$6.6

1

$9.1

3

$9.7

0

$3.5

2 $8.9

2

-$7.

98

$4.4

3

-$19

.81

$9.2

4

$6.0

0

$1.6

6

-$25-$20-$15-$10

-$5$0$5

$10$15$20

90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0910:Q3

Realized Capital Losses Were the Primary Cause of 2008/2009’s Large Drop in Profits and ROE and Were a Major

Driver of Its Recovery in 2010

($ Billions)Capital losses have

turned to capital gains, aiding earnings

30

Treasury Yield Curves: Pre-Crisis (July 2007) vs. December 2010

0.09% 0.14% 0.19% 0.29%0.62%

2.66%

3.29%

4.82% 4.96% 5.04% 4.96% 4.82% 4.82% 4.88% 5.00% 4.93% 5.00%5.19%

1.93%

0.99%

4.42%4.17%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

1M 3M 6M 1Y 2Y 3Y 5Y 7Y 10Y 20Y 30Y

October 2010 Yield Curve*Pre-Crisis (July 2007)

Treasury yield curve is near its most depressed level in at least 45 years,

though longer yields rose in late 2010 as economy improves. Investment

income is falling as a result.

The Fed’s Announced Intention to Pursue Additional Quantitative Easing Could Further Depress Rates in the 7 to 10-Year Maturity Range

Sources: Board of Governors of the United States Federal Reserve Bank; Insurance Information Institute.

QE2 Target

31

-1.8

%

-1.8

%

-2.0

%

-3.6

%

-3.3

%

-3.3

%

-3.7

%

-4.3

%

-5.2

%

-5.7

%

-7.3%

-1.9

%

-2.1

%

-3.1

%

-8%-7%-6%-5%-4%-3%-2%-1%0%

Perso

nal L

ines

Pvt Pass

Aut

o

Pers P

rop

Comm

ercia

l

Comm

l Auto

Credit

Comm

Pro

p

Comm

Cas

Fidelity

/Sure

ty

War

rant

y

Surplu

s Line

s

Med

Mal

WC

Reinsu

ranc

e**

Lower Investment Earnings Place a Greater Burden on Underwriting and Pricing Discipline

*Based on 2008 Invested Assets and Earned Premiums**US domestic reinsurance onlySource: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute.

Reduction in Combined Ratio Necessary to Offset 1% Decline in Investment Yield to Maintain Constant ROE, by Line*

32*Net admitted assets. Sources: NAIC; Insurance Information Institute research.

Invested assets totaled $1.26 trillion

Generally, insurers invest conservatively, with over 2/3 of invested assets in bonds

Only 18% of invested assets were in common or preferred stock

Portfolio Factsas of 12/31/2009

68.8%

6.2%18.0%

7.0%

Bonds

Common & Preferred Stock

As of December 31, 2009

Cash & Short-term

Investments

Other

Distribution of P/C Insurance Industry’s Investment Portfolio

33

2011 Financial Overview About Half of the P/C Insurance Industry’s Bond Investments Are in Municipal Bonds

Sources: NAIC, via SNL Financial; Insurance Information Institute research.

Investments in “Political Subdivision [of states]” bonds were $102.5 billion

Investments in “States, Territories, & Possessions” bonds were $58.9 billion

Investments in “Special Revenue” bonds were $288.2 billion

All state, local, and special revenue bonds totaled 48.2% of bonds, about 35.7% of total invested assets

Bond Investment Factsas of 12/31/09

0.9%

2.0%15.5%

6.3%

11.0%

31.0%33.3%

U.S. Government

Special Revenue

As of December 31, 2009

States, Terr., etc.

Industrial

Foreign Govt

Political Subdivisions

2011 Financial Overview When P/C Insurers Invest in Higher Risk Bonds,It’s Corporates, Not Munis

Data are as of year-end 2009. Sources: SNL Financial; Insurance Information Institute.

The NAIC’s Securities Valuation Office puts bonds into one of 6 classes: class 1 has the lowest expected impairments; successively higher

numbered classes imply increasing impairment likelihood.

Financial Strength & Underwriting

35

Cyclical Pattern is P-C Impairment History is Directly Tied to

Underwriting, Reserving & Pricing

P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–20098

15

12

71

19

34

91

31

21

99

16

14

13

36

49

31 3

45

04

85

56

05

84

12

91

61

23

11

8 19

49 50

47

35

18

14 15

7 65

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

Source: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute.

The Number of Impairments Varies Significantly Over the P/C Insurance Cycle, With Peaks Occurring Well into Hard Markets

5 of the 11 are Florida companies (1 of these

5 is a title insurer)

38

Reasons for US P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–2008

38.1%

14.3%8.1%

7.6%

7.9%

7.0%

9.1%

4.2%

3.7%

Source: A.M. Best: 1969-2008 Impairment Review, Special Report, Apr. 6, 2009

Deficient Loss Reserves and Inadequate Pricing Are the Leading Cause of Insurer Impairments, Underscoring the Importance of Discipline.

Investment Catastrophe Losses Play a Much Smaller Role

Deficient Loss Reserves/Inadequate Pricing

Reinsurance Failure

Rapid GrowthAlleged Fraud

Catastrophe Losses

Affiliate Impairment

Investment Problems

Misc.

Sig. Change in Business

39

Underwriting Trends – Financial Crisis Does Not

Directly Impact Underwriting Performance

40

P/C Insurance Industry Combined Ratio, 2001–2010:Q3*

* Excludes Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers in 2008, 2009 and 2010. Including M&FG, 2008=105.1, 2009=100.7, 2010:Q3=101.2 Sources: A.M. Best, ISO.

95.7

99.3 99.7101.0

92.6

100.898.4

100.1

107.5

115.8

90

100

110

120

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010:Q3

Best Combined

Ratio Since 1949 (87.6)

As Recently as 2001, Insurers Paid Out

Nearly $1.16 for Every $1 in Earned

Premiums

Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases

Cyclical Deterioration

Heavy Use of Reinsurance Lowered Net

Losses

Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases

Lower CAT

Losses, More

Reserve Releases

43

Calendar Year Combined Ratios by Segment: 2008-2011F

Sources: A.M. Best . Insurance Information Institute.

102.4

98.9100

106

99.5

108

103.8104.5

9092949698

100102104106108110

Personal Lines Commercial Lines

2008 2009 2010P 2011F

Overall deterioration in 2011 underwriting performance is due to expected return to normal catastrophe activity along with deteriorating underwriting

performance related to the prolonged commercial soft market

Personal lines combined ratio is expected to remain stable in 2010 while commercial lines and reinsurance deteriorate

44

Profitability and Growth in Texas P/C Insurance Markets

Analysis by Line and Nearby State Comparisons

45

RNW All Lines: TX vs. U.S., 2000-2009

Sources: NAIC.

-20%

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

US All Lines TX All Lines

P/C Insurer profitability in TX is highly variable and

below that of the US overall over the past decade

US: 7.0%

TX: 3.7%

(Percent)

46

RNW PP Auto: TX vs. U.S., 2000-2009

Sources: NAIC.

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

US PP Auto TX PP Auto

Pvt. Passenger Auto profitability in TX is has

been somewhat below the US in recent years

Average 2000-2009

US: 7.2%

TX: 6.1%

47

RNW Comm. Auto: TX vs. U.S.,2000-2009

Sources: NAIC.

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

US Comm Auto TX Comm Auto

(Percent)Commercial Auto

profitability in TX is generally below the US

average

Average 2000-2009

US: 8.5%

TX: 5.6%

48

RNW Comm. Multi-Peril: TX vs. U.S.,2000-2009

Sources: NAIC.

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

US Comm M-P TX Comm M-P

(Percent)Hurricane Ike put a big

dent in CMP profitability in 2008

Average 2000-2009

US: 8.0%

TX: 0.4%

49

RNW Homeowners: TX vs. U.S.,2000-2009

Sources: NAIC.

-60%

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

US HO TX HO

(Percent)Homeowners Profitability: Mold,

Hurricanes, Hail & Tornadoes

(Need I Say More?)

Average 2000-2009

US: 4.7%

TX: -2.3%

50

RNW Workers Comp: TX vs. U.S.,2000-2009

Sources: NAIC.

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

US WComp TX WComp

(Percent)Workers comp

profitability in TX has generally

outperformed the US

Average 2000-2009

US: 6.4%

TX: 9.2%

All Lines: 10-Year Average RNW TX & Nearby States

-9.3%

6.0%

6.9%

7.0%

10.5%

-13.0%

3.7%

-15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15%

New Mexico

U.S.

Arkansas

Oklahoma

Texas

Mississippi

Louisiana

Source: NAIC, Insurance Information Institute

2000-2009

Texas All Lines profitability is below the US and

regional average

PP Auto: 10-Year Average RNW TX & Nearby States

4.7%

7.6%

6.8%

7.2%

11.1%

0.8%

6.1%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12%

New Mexico

U.S.

Arkansas

Oklahoma

Texas

Mississippi

Louisiana

Source: NAIC, Insurance Information Institute

2000-2009

Texas PP Auto profitability is below the US and regional

average

53

Top Ten Most Expensive And Least Expensive States For Automobile Insurance, 2008 (1)

RankMost

expensive statesAverage

expenditure RankLeast

expensive statesAverage

expenditure1 D.C. $1,126 1 North Dakota $503

2 Louisiana 1,105 2 Iowa 519

3 New Jersey 1,081 3 South Dakota 520

4 Florida 1,055 4 Nebraska 547

5 New York 1,044 5 Idaho 562

6 Delaware 1,007 6 Kansas 576

7 Rhode Island 986 7 Wisconsin 581

8 Nevada 970 8 North Carolina 595

9 Connecticut 950 9 Maine 600

10 Maryland 922 10 Indiana 612

(1) Based on average automobile insurance expenditures.

Source: © 2010 National Association of Insurance Commissioners.

Texas ranked 15th in 2008, with an average expenditure for auto insurance of $854.

Comm. Auto: 10-Year Average RNW TX & Nearby States

3.1%

7.2%

6.1%

8.5%

11.1%

-3.8%

5.6%

-5% 0% 5% 10% 15%

New Mexico

U.S.

Arkansas

Oklahoma

Texas

Mississippi

Louisiana

Source: NAIC, Insurance Information Institute

2000-2009

Texas Commercial Auto profitability is below the US and regional average

Comm. M-P: 10-Year Average RNW TX & Nearby States

-10.0%

11.0%

6.4%

8.0%

13.3%

-20.2%

0.4%

-30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20%

New Mexico

U.S.

Arkansas

Oklahoma

Texas

Mississippi

Louisiana

Source: NAIC, Insurance Information Institute

2000-2009

Texas Commercial Multi-Peril profitability

is below the US and regional average

Homeowners: 10-Year Average RNW TX & Nearby States

-29.0%

-1.6%

-6.9%

4.7%

12.0%

-32.4%

-2.3%

-40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20%

New Mexico

U.S.

Arkansas

Oklahoma

Texas

Mississippi

Louisiana

Source: NAIC, Insurance Information Institute

2000-2009

Texas Homeowners profitability is below the US and regional

average

57

Top Ten Most Expensive And Least Expensive States For Homeowners Insurance, 2008 (1)

RankMost

expensive statesAverage

expenditure RankLeast

expensive statesAverage

expenditure1 Texas (3) $1,460 1 Idaho  $387

2 Florida (4) 1,390 2 Utah  432

3 Louisiana  1,155 3 Oregon  439

4 Oklahoma 1,048 4 Washington 471

5 Massachusetts  1,026 5 Wisconsin  503

6 New York  983 6 Delaware  535

7 Connecticut 980 7 Ohio  565

8 Mississippi  980 8 Maine 572

9 D.C.  926 9 Pennsylvania  586

10 Kansas 916 10 Kentucky  601

(1) States with the same premium receive the same rank.(2) Based on the HO-3 homeowner package policy for owner-occupied dwellings, 1 to 4 family units. Provides “all risks” coverage (except those

specifically excluded in the policy) on buildings and broad named-peril coverage on personal property, and is the most common package written.(3) The Texas Department of Insurance developed home insurance policy forms that are similar but not identical to the standard forms.(4) Florida data excludes policies written by Citizen's Property Insurance Corporation, the state's insurer of last resort, and therefore are not directly

comparable to other states.

Note: Average premium=Premiums/exposure per house years. A house year is equal to 365 days of insured coverage for a single dwelling. The NAIC does not rank State Average Expenditures and does not endorse any conclusions drawn from this data.

Source: © 2010 National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). Reprinted with permission. Further reprint or distribution strictly prohibited without written permission of NAIC.

Texas ranked as the most expensive state for homeowners insurance in 2008, with an average expenditure of $1,460.

Workers Comp: 10-Year Average RNW TX & Nearby States

9.5%

3.7%

13.2%

6.4%

8.7%

9.9%

9.2%

0% 5% 10% 15%

New Mexico

U.S.

Arkansas

Oklahoma

Texas

Mississippi

Louisiana

Source: NAIC, Insurance Information Institute

2000-2010

Texas Workers Comp profitability is

above the US average but similar

to the regional average

59

All Lines DWP Growth: TX vs. U.S., 2000-2009

Source: SNL Financial.

4.6

%

12

.0% 14

.3%

9.8

%

7.4

%

2.2

%

3.4

%

0.5

%

-2.1

%

5.2

%

15

.7%

20

.5%

7.9

%

0.3

%

1.4

%

6.2

%

3.7

%

2.7

%

-1.6

%

-3.3

%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

US DWP: All Lines TX DWP: All Lines

Texas DWP growth is generally higher than

for the US overall.

Average: 2000-2009

US: 4.9%

TX: 6.2%

(Percent)

60

Comm. Lines DWP Growth: TX vs. U.S., 2000-2009

Source: SNL Financial.

6.3

%

15

.3% 19

.0%

11

.4%

4.5

%

3.3

% 5.4

%

0.2

%

-1.2

%

-9.3

%

7.6

%

19

.2%

27

.2%

9.2

%

0.1

% 2.3

%

10

.4%

4.1

%

0.0

%

-7.4

%

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

US DWP: Comm. Lines TX DWP: Comm. Lines

(Percent) Texas Commercial Lines DWP growth is generally higher than

for the US overall.

Average: 2000-2009

US: 5.5%

TX: 7.3%

61

Personal Lines DWP Growth: TX vs. U.S., 2000-2009

Source: SNL Financial.

2.8

%

8.2

%

11

.1%

9.2

%

5.3

%

2.2

%

2.3

%

1.2

%

0.0

% 1.1

%

3.1

%

11

.3%

16

.8%

7.2

%

0.8

%

0.7

% 2.4

%

2.9

%

5.5

%

4.3

%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

US DWP: Personal Lines TX DWP: Personal Lines

(Percent) Texas Commercial Lines DWP growth is generally higher than

for the US overall.

Average: 2000-2009

US: 4.3%

TX: 5.5%

Shifting Legal Liability & Tort Environment

62

Is the Tort PendulumSwinging Against Insurers?

Cost of US Tort System ($ Billions)$1

29

$130 $1

41

$144

$148 $1

59

$156

$156 $1

67

$169 $1

80 $205 $2

33 $246 $2

60

$261

$247

$252

$255

$248 $2

70

$259 $2

70

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08

10E

12E

* Restated in 2009 dollars, based on CPI.Source: Towers Watson, 2010 Update on US Tort Cost Trends.

Per capita “tort tax” was $808 in 2009, up from $793 in 2000*

Tort costs consumed 1.74% of GDP in 2009, down from 2.21% in 2003

67

Over the Last Three Decades, Total Tort Costs as a % of GDP Appear Somewhat Cyclical

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10E 12E

To

rt S

ys

tem

Co

sts

1.50%

1.75%

2.00%

2.25%

2.50%

To

rt Co

sts

as

% o

f GD

P

Tort Sytem Costs Tort Costs as % of GDP

($ Billions)

Sources: Towers Watson, 2010 Update on US Tort Cost Trends, Appendix 1A

Tort Costs Have Remained High but Relatively Stable Since the mid-2000s. As a Share of GDP they Should Fall as

the Economy Expands

Business Leaders Ranking of Liability Systems in 2010

Best States

1. Delaware

2. North Dakota

3. Nebraska

4. Indiana

5. Iowa

6. Virginia

7. Utah

8. Colorado

9. Massachusetts

10. South Dakota

Worst States

41. New Mexico

42. Florida

43. Montana

44. Arkansas

45. Illinois

46. California

47. Alabama

48. Mississippi

49. Louisiana

50. West Virginia

Source: US Chamber of Commerce 2010 State Liability Systems Ranking Study; Insurance Info. Institute.

New in 2010

North Dakota Massachusetts South Dakota

Drop-offs

Maine Vermont Kansas

Newly Notorious

New Mexico Montana Arkansas

Rising Above

Texas South Carolina Hawaii

Midwest/West has mix of good and bad states.

69

The Nation’s Judicial Hellholes: 2010

Source: American Tort Reform Association; Insurance Information Institute

South Florida

West VirginiaIllinoisCook County

NevadaClark County

Watch List Madison County, IL Atlantic County, NJ St. Landry Parish,

LA District of Columbia NYC & Albany, NY St. Clair County, IL

Dishonorable Mention

MI Supreme Court City of St. Louis CO Supreme Court

CaliforniaLos Angeles

and Humboldt Counties

Philadelphia

Average Jury Awards 1999 - 2008

$725$747 $756

$800 $799

$1,018 $1,022

$950

$1,077$1,046

$500

$600

$700

$800

$900

$1,000

$1,100

$1,200

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Source: Jury Verdict Research; Insurance Information Institute.

Sum of Top 10 Jury Awards, 2004-2010

$5,159

$2,954

$815$616

$1,344$1,511 $1,568

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Source: Insurance Information Institute from Lawyers USA, January 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010.

The sum of the largest jury awards was up

slightly in 2010

2010 Top Ten Jury Verdicts

Source: Lawyers USA, January 18, 2011.

Value Issue State

$505.1 Million Products Liability Nevada

$208.8 Million Personal Injury (Asbestos/Mesothelioma case) California

$152 Million Wrongful Death (Tobacco verdict) Massachusetts

$132.5 Million Personal Injury (Ford rollover retrial) Mississippi

$124.5 Million Personal Injury (Passenger van rollover case) Texas

$103 Million Legal Malpractice/Breach of Fiduciary Duty Mississippi

$90.8 Million Products Liability, Wrongful Death (Tobacco verdict) Florida

$89 Million Personal Injury, Products Liability Pennsylvania

$82.5 Million Wrongful Death Texas

$80 Million Wrongful Death (Tobacco verdict) Florida

2009 Top Ten Jury Verdicts

Source: Lawyers USA, January 15, 2010.

Value Issue State

$370 Million Defamation California

$330 Million Personal Injury (Drunk driving case) Florida

$300 Million Personal Injury (Tobacco verdict) Florida

$89 Million Personal Injury (Drunk driving case) Missouri

$78.75 Million Personal Injury (Prempro) New Jersey

$77.4 Million Medical Malpractice New York

$71 Million Conversion and Breach of Fiduciary Duty Texas

$70 Million Workers Comp Case Texas

$65 Million Personal Injury Florida

$60 Million Medical Malpractice New York

2008 Top Ten Jury Verdicts

Source: Lawyers USA, January 13, 2009.

Value Issue State

$388 Million Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

Nevada

$316 Million Breach of Contract Georgia

$188 Million Defamation New York

$85 Million Premises Liability Pennsylvania

$84 Million Negligence, Personal Injury Texas

$66 Million Breach of Fiduciary Duty Oklahoma

$60 Million Insurance Bad Faith Nevada

$55 Million Negligence California

$54 Million Wrongful Death Georgia

$48 Million Negligence Indiana

Where Will the Exposure Growth Come From?

85

Personal LinesCommercial Lines

86

US Real GDP Growth*

* Estimates/Forecasts from Blue Chip Economic Indicators.Source: US Department of Commerce, Blue Economic Indicators 1/11; Insurance Information Institute.

2.7

%

0.9

%

3.2

%

2.3

%

2.9

%

-0.7

%

0.6

%

-4.0

%

-6.8

% -4.9

%

-0.7

%

1.6

%

5.0

%

3.7

%

1.7

%

2.6

%

3.2

%

3.2

%

3.3

%

3.3

%

3.5

%

3.1

%

3.2

%

3.2

%3

.3%

4.1

%

1.1

%

1.8

%

2.5

% 3.6

%

3.1

%

-8%

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

   2

00

0   

   2

00

1   

   2

00

2   

   2

00

3   

   2

00

4   

   2

00

5   

   2

00

6   

07

:1Q

07

:2Q

07

:3Q

07

:4Q

08

:1Q

08

:2Q

08

:3Q

08

:4Q

09

:1Q

09

:2Q

09

:3Q

09

:4Q

10

:1Q

10

:2Q

10

:3Q

10

:4Q

11

:1Q

11

:2Q

11

:3Q

11

:4Q

12

:1Q

12

:2Q

12

:3Q

12

:4Q

Demand for Insurance Continues To Be Impacted by Sluggish Economic Conditions, but the Benefits of Even Slow Growth Will Compound and

Gradually Benefit the Economy Broadly

Real GDP Growth (%)

Recession began in Dec. 2007. Economic toll of credit

crunch, housing slump, labor market contraction has

been severe but modest recovery is underway

The Q4:2008 decline was the steepest since the Q1:1982 drop of 6.8%

Economic growth projections for 2011 have been revised

upward. This is a major positive for insurance demand

and exposure growth.

87

Real GDP Growth: US vs. TX, 1998-2009

6.3%

4.4% 4.2%

2.6% 2.4%

0.3%

4.8%4.4%

4.8%4.2%

1.3%1.7%

2.1%

3.4%2.8% 2.7%

2.1%

0.1%

-1.5%

4.6%

0.5%0.2%

5.5%

-2.1%

-3%

-2%

-1%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

TexasUS

Real economic growth in Texas outpaced the US from 1998-2009. The average rate of real economic growth was 2.9% in Texas and 2.3% in the US

Pursue Additional Quantitative Easing Could Further Depress Rates in the 7 to 10-Year Maturity Range

Sources: Board of Governors of the United States Federal Reserve Bank; Insurance Information Institute.

2011 Financial Overview State Economic Growth Varied in 2009

89

Mountain, Plains states still growing the fastest

Some Southeast states growing well, but others

among the weakest

90

Direct Premiums Written: All Lines Percent Change by State, 2004-2009

42

.9

23

.8

22

.0

18

.8

17

.2

15

.4

14

.8

14

.2

14

.1

14

.0

13

.5

13

.0

13

.0

12

.9

12

.8

12

.3

12

.2

11

.5

10

.7

7.9

5.8

5.5

5.1

5.0

4.6

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

ND LA

SD

WY

MT

UT

OK

DE IA

NM

MS

WV

SC

DC

TX

NE

KS

NC ID AL

FL

WA

GA

AR HI

Pe

ce

nt

ch

an

ge

(%

)

Sources: SNL Financial LC.; Insurance Information Institute.

Top 25 States

North Dakota is the growth juggernaut of the P/C

insurance industry—too bad nobody lives there…

Texas was the 15th fastest growing state for P/C

insurers from 2004-2009 and one of the few large states to see any growth

91

4.5

4.2

2.6

2.5

2.4

2.0

0.9

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.0

-0.1

-2.8

-3.1

-3.5

-3.7

-5.2

-8.2

-9.2

-14

.8

-15

.2

-0.5

-1.2

-1.6

-1.8

-2.4

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5A

K

VA

TN

KY

MD

MO AZ

OR WI

NV

NY IN PA

MN

VT

CO

CT RI

NJ IL

ME

OH

NH

MA MI

CA

Pe

ce

nt

ch

an

ge

(%

)

Sources: SNL Financial LC; Insurance Information Institute.

Bottom 25 States

States with the poorest performing economies also produced the most negative net change in premiums of

the past 5 years

Over the 5 years from 2004-2009, 15 states saw premiums shrink,one had no growth, and 4 others grew premiums by less than 1%

Direct Premiums Written: All Lines Percent Change by State, 2004-2009

92

Annual Inflation Rates, (CPI-U, %),1990–2014F

2.8 2.6

1.51.9

3.3 3.4

1.3

2.5 2.3

3.0

3.8

2.8

3.8

-0.4

1.6 1.7 1.92.2 2.2

2.92.4

3.23.0

5.14.9

-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10F 11F 12F 13F 14F

Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Blue Chip Economic Indicators, 10/10 and 1/11 (forecasts).

The slack in the U.S. economy suggests that inflation should not heat upbefore 2012, but other forces (commodity prices, inflation in countries from which we import, etc.), plus U.S. debt burden, remain longer-run concerns

Annual Inflation Rates (%)

Inflation peaked at 5.6% in August 2008 on high energy and commodity crisis. The recession and the collapse of the commodity bubble have reduced near-

term inflationary pressures

94

(Millions of Units)

New Private Housing Starts, 1990-2016F

1.4

8

1.4

7 1.6

2

1.6

4

1.5

7

1.6

0 1.7

1 1.8

5 1.9

6 2.0

7

1.8

0

1.3

6

0.9

0

0.5

6

0.5

9

0.6

8

0.8

9

1.2

0 1.3

3 1.4

3

1.5

0

1.3

51.4

6

1.2

9

1.2

0

1.0

11.1

9

0.3

0.5

0.7

0.9

1.1

1.3

1.5

1.7

1.9

2.1

90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10F11F12F13F14F15F16F

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (1/11); Insurance Information Institute.

Little Exposure Growth Likely for Homeowners Insurers Until 2012. Also Affects Commercial Insurers with Construction Risk Exposure, Surety

New home starts plunged

72% from 2005-2009; A

net annual decline of 1.49 million units, lowest since

records began in 1959

I.I.I. estimates that each incremental 100,000 decline in housing starts costs home insurers

$87.5 million in new exposure (gross premium). The net exposure loss in 2009 vs. 2005 is

estimated at about $1.3 billion

Job growth, improved credit

market conditions and demographics

will eventually boost home construction

2011 Financial Overview Average Square Footage of Completed New Homes in U.S., 1973-2010*

1,66

01,

695

1,64

51,

700

1,72

01,

755

1,76

01,

740

1,72

01,

710

1,72

51,

780

1,78

51,

825 1,90

5 1,99

52,

035

2,08

02,

075

2,09

52,

095

2,10

02,

095

2,12

02,

150

2,19

02,

223

2,26

62,

324

2,32

02,

330

2,34

9 2,43

42,

469

2,52

12,

519

2,43

82,

374

1,500

1,700

1,900

2,100

2,300

2,500

2,700

73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10

*2010 figure is weighted average square feet of completed homes in first three quarters of 2010Source: U.S. Census Bureau: http://www.census.gov/const/www/quarterly_starts_completions.pdf; Insurance Information Institute.

Square Ft

The trend toward building larger homes reversed in 2009 and 2010, affecting exposure growth beyond the decline in number of units built

The average size of completed new homes often falls in recessions (yellow bars), but historically bounces back in expansions

95

The average size of completed new homes fell by 145 square feet (5.75%) from 2008-2010, the largest recession-based drop in nearly four decades

97

Wage and Salary Disbursement (Private Employment) vs. WC NWP ($ Billions)

2011 Financial Overview Wage and Salary Disbursements (Payroll Base) vs. Workers Comp Net Written Premiums

* Average Wage and Salary data as of 7/1/2010. Shaded areas indicate recessions. **Estimated “official” end of recession June 2009.Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis; Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis at http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/WASCUR ; I.I.I. Fact Books

Weakening payrolls have eroded $2B+ in workers comp premiums; nearly 29% of NPW has been eroded away by the soft market and weak economy

7/90-3/91 3/01-11/01

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10*

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

Wage & SalaryDisbursements

WC NPW

WC net premiums written were down $13.7B or 28.7%

to $34.1B in 2009 after peaking at $47.8B in 2005

12/07-6/09

66%

68%

70%

72%

74%

76%

78%

80%

82%

Ma

r 0

1

Ju

n 0

1

Se

p 0

1

De

c 0

1

Ma

r 0

2

Ju

n 0

2

Se

p 0

2

De

c 0

2

Ma

r 0

3

Ju

n 0

3

Se

p 0

3

De

c 0

3

Ma

r 0

4

Ju

n 0

4

Se

p 0

4

De

c 0

4

Ma

r 0

5

Ju

n 0

5

Se

p 0

5

De

c 0

5

Ma

r 0

6

Ju

n 0

6

Se

p 0

6

De

c 0

6

Ma

r 0

7

Ju

n 0

7

Se

p 0

7

De

c 0

7

Ma

r 0

8

Ju

n 0

8

Se

p 0

8

De

c 0

8

Ma

r 0

9

Ju

n 0

9

Se

p 0

9

De

c 0

9

Ma

r 1

0

Ju

n 1

0

Se

p 1

0

Recovery in Capacity Utilization is a Positive Sign for Commercial Exposures

Source: Federal Reserve Board statistical releases at http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm. 98

Percent of Industrial Capacity

Hurricane Katrina

March 2001-November 2001

recession

“Full Capacity”

The closer the economy is to operating at “full

capacity,” the greater the inflationary pressure

The US operated at 75.2% of industrial

capacity in November 2010, above the June

2009 low of 68.3%

December 2007-June 2009 Recession

99

43,6

9448

,125

69,3

0062

,436

64,0

04 71,2

77 81,2

3582

,446

63,8

5363

,235

64,8

5371

,549

70,6

4362

,304

52,3

7451

,959

53,5

4954

,027

44,3

6737

,884

35,4

7240

,099

38,5

4035

,037

34,3

1739

,201

19,6

95 28,3

2243

,546

60,8

3743

,016

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0910

:3Q

Business Bankruptcy Filings,1980-2010:Q3

Sources: American Bankruptcy Institute at http://www.abiworld.org/AM/AMTemplate.cfm?Section=Home&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=61633 ; Insurance Information Institute

Significant Exposure Implications for All Commercial Lines

There were 60,837 business bankruptcies in 2009, up 40% from 2008 and the most since 1993. 2010:Q3

bankruptcies totaled 29,059, down 5.5% from 2009:Q3

% Change Surrounding Recessions

1980-82 58.6%1980-87 88.7%1990-91 10.3%2000-01 13.0%2006-09 208.9%*

100

Private Sector Business Starts, 1993:Q2 – 2010:Q1*

175

186

174

180

186

192

188

187 18

918

6 190 19

419

119

9 204

202

195

196

196

206

206

201

192

198

206

206

203

211

205

212

200 20

520

420

419

720

320

920

1

192

192

193

201 20

420

221

0 212

209

216 22

0 223

220

220

210

221

212

204

218

209

207

199

191 19

317

117

716

918

417

2

203

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

Business Starts Were Down Nearly 20% in the Recession, Holding Back Most Types of Commercial Insurance Exposure

* Latest available as of December 29, 2010, seasonally adjustedSource: Bureau of Labor Statistics, http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cewbd.t07.htm.

(Thousands)

180,000 businesses started in 2009:Q4, the best quarter in 2009. 2009 was the slowest year for new

business starts since 1993.

Business Starts2006: 872,0002007: 843,0002008: 790,0002009: 697,000

Financial Strength & Ratings

102

Industry Has Weathered the Storms Well

P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–20098

15

12

71

19

34

91

31

21

99

16

14

13

36

49

31 3

45

04

85

56

05

84

12

91

61

23

11

8 19

49 50

47

35

18

14 15

7 65

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

Source: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute.

The Number of Impairments Varies Significantly Over the P/C Insurance Cycle, With Peaks Occurring Well into Hard Markets

5 of the 11 are Florida companies (1 of these

5 is a title insurer)

106

Reasons for US P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–2008

38.1%

14.3%8.1%

7.6%

7.9%

7.0%

9.1%

4.2%

3.7%

Source: A.M. Best: 1969-2008 Impairment Review, Special Report, Apr. 6, 2009

Deficient Loss Reserves and Inadequate Pricing Are the Leading Cause of Insurer Impairments, Underscoring the Importance of Discipline.

Investment Catastrophe Losses Play a Much Smaller Role

Deficient Loss Reserves/In-adequate Pricing

Reinsurance Failure

Rapid GrowthAlleged Fraud

Catastrophe Losses

Affiliate Impairment

Investment Problems

Misc.

Sig. Change in Business

121

Labor Market Trends

Massive Job Losses Sapped the Economy and Commercial/Personal

Lines Exposure, But Trend is Improving

122

2011 Financial Overview Unemployment and Underemployment Rates: Rocketed Up in 2008-09; Stabilized in 2010

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Jan00

Jan01

Jan02

Jan03

Jan04

Jan05

Jan06

Jan07

Jan08

Jan09

Jan10

Traditional Unemployment Rate U-3

Unemployment + Underemployment Rate U-6

Dec.10

Unemployment rate fell to 9.4%

in December

Unemployment peaked at 10.1% in October 2009, highest monthly rate since 1983.

Peak rate in the last 30 years:

10.8% in November -

December 1982

Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.

U-6 went from 8.0% in March

2007 to 17.5% in October 2009; Stood at 16.7%

in December 2010

January 2000 through December 2010, Seasonally Adjusted (%)

Recession ended in

November 2001

Unemployment kept rising for

19 more months

Recession began in

December 2007

Stubbornly high unemployment and underemploymentwill constrain payroll growth, which directly affects WC exposure

18

67

92

13

65 1

27

42

15

-10

9-1

46

5 97

23

-12

-85 -58

-16

1-2

53

-23

0-2

57

-34

7-4

56

-54

7-7

34 -66

7-8

06 -7

07

-74

4 -64

9-3

34

-45

2-2

97 -2

15

-18

6-2

62

75

-83

16 6

2

24

15

1 61 1

17

14

31

12 1

93

79 1

1315

8

(1,000)

(800)

(600)

(400)

(200)

0

200

400

Jan

-07

Fe

b-0

7M

ar-

07

Ap

r-0

7M

ay-

07

Jun

-07

Jul-

07

Au

g-0

7S

ep

-07

Oct

-07

No

v-0

7D

ec-

07

Jan

-08

Fe

b-0

8M

ar-

08

Ap

r-0

8M

ay-

08

Jun

-08

Jul-

08

Au

g-0

8S

ep

-08

Oct

-08

No

v-0

8D

ec-

08

Jan

-09

Fe

b-0

9M

ar-

09

Ap

r-0

9M

ay-

09

Jun

-09

Jul-

09

Au

g-0

9S

ep

-09

Oct

-09

No

v-0

9D

ec-

09

Jan

-10

Fe

b-1

0M

ar-

10

Ap

r-1

0M

ay-

10

Jun

-10

Jul-

10

Au

g-1

0S

ep

-10

Oct

-10

No

v-1

0D

ec-

10

Monthly Change in Private Employment

January 2008 through December 2010* (Thousands)

Private Employers Added 1.346 million Jobs in 2010 After Having Shed 4.66 Million Jobs in 2009 and 3.81 Million in 2008

Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Information Institute

Monthly Losses in Dec. 08–Mar. 09 Were

the Largest in the Post-WW II Period

Private employers added jobs in every month in 2010 for a total of

1.346 million for the year

113,000 private sector jobs were created in

December

125

US Unemployment Rate

4.5

%

4.5

%

4.6

%

4.8

%

4.9

% 5.4

% 6.1

%

6.9

%

8.1

%

9.3

%

9.6

% 10

.0%

9.7

%

9.6

%

9.6

%

9.6

%

9.5

%

9.3

%

9.1

%

8.9

%

8.7

%

8.6

%

8.4

%

9.6

%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

10.0%

11.0%

07

:Q1

07

:Q2

07

:Q3

07

:Q4

08

:Q1

08

:Q2

08

:Q3

08

:Q4

09

:Q1

09

:Q2

09

:Q3

09

:Q4

10

:Q1

10

:Q2

10

:Q3

10

:Q4

11

:Q1

11

:Q2

11

:Q3

11

:Q4

12

:Q1

12

:Q2

12

:Q3

12

:Q4

Rising unemployment eroded payrolls

and workers comp’s

exposure base.

Unemployment likely peaked at 10%

in late 2009.

* = actual; = forecastsSources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (1/11); Insurance Information Institute

2007:Q1 to 2012:Q4F*

Unemployment forecasts remain stubbornly high

through 2011, but still imply millions of new

jobs will created.

127

Unemployment Rates by State, December 2010:Highest 25 States*

8.89.

59.

59.7

9.5

9.6

9.6

9.3

9.1

9.3

8.89.

4

9.0

9.19.4

10.611

.5

9.810

.110

.2

10.3

10.7

12.5

12.0

11.7

14.5

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

NV CA FL MI RI SC OR KY GA MS NC DC WV OH MO IN ID US TN AZ WA IL NJ AL CT CO

Une

mpl

oym

ent R

ate

(%)

*Provisional figures for December 2010, seasonally adjusted.

Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.

In December, 31 states and DC reported unemployment rate decreases from a

year earlier, 16 states had increases and 3 had no change.

16 states + DC had unemployment rates above

the US average in Dec. 2010, 34 states were below.

128

6.7

6.4

6.3

5.8

6.8

6.87.

37.

4

4.44.6

5.5

7.07.2

3.8

6.4

8.1

8.2

7.5

7.57.

98.08.28.

5

8.5

8.38.

5

0

2

4

6

8

10

PA NM DE TX NY MA AK LA AR WI UT MD ME MT MN OK KS VA WY HI IA VT NH SD NE ND

Une

mpl

oym

ent R

ate

(%)

Unemployment Rates By State, December 2010: Lowest 25 States*

*Provisional figures for December 2010, seasonally adjusted.Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.

In December, state and regional unemployment rates were little changed.

Some 31 states and DC reported unemployment rate decreases from a

year earlier, 16 states had increases and 3 had no change.

Unemployment in Texas has been well below that of the US

during and after the recession—contributing its relatively strong

p/c exposure performance

143

Catastrophic Loss –Catastrophe Losses Trends Are

Trending Adversely

144

$8

.3

$7

.4

$2

.6 $1

0.1

$8

.3

$4

.6

$2

6.5

$5

.9 $1

2.9 $

27

.5

$6

1.9

$9

.2

$6

.7

$2

7.1

$1

0.6

$1

3.6

$1

00

.0

$7

.5

$2

.7

$4

.7

$2

2.9

$5

.5 $1

6.9

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10*20??

US Insured Catastrophe Losses

*Estimate from Munich Re.Note: 2001 figure includes $20.3B for 9/11 losses reported through 12/31/01. Includes only business and personal property claims, business interruption and auto claims. Non-prop/BI losses = $12.2B.Sources: Property Claims Service/ISO; Munich Re; Insurance Information Institute.

2010 CAT Losses Were Close to “Average” Figures Do Not Include an Estimate of Deepwater Horizon Loss

$100 Billion CAT Year is Coming Eventually

First Half 2010 CAT

Losses Were Down 19% or $1.4B from

first half 2009

($ Billions)

2000s: A Decade of Disaster

2000s: $193B (up 117%)

1990s: $89B

145

Combined Ratio Points Associated with Catastrophe Losses: 1960 – 2010E

Notes: Private carrier losses only. Excludes loss adjustment expenses and reinsurance reinstatement premiums. Figures are adjusted for losses ultimately paid by foreign insurers and reinsurers.Source: ISO; Insurance Information Institute estimate for 2010.

0.4

1.2

0.4 0.

8 1.3

0.3 0.4 0.

71.

51.

00.

40.

4 0.7

1.8

1.1

0.6

1.4 2.

01.

3 2.0

0.5

0.5 0.7

3.0

1.2

2.1

8.8

2.3

5.9

3.3

2.8

1.0

3.6

2.9

1.6

5.4

1.6

3.3

3.3

8.1

2.7

1.6

5.0

2.6 3.

33.6

0.9

0.1

1.1

1.1

0.8

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1960

1962

1964

1966

1968

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

E

The Catastrophe Loss Component of Private Insurer Losses Has Increased Sharply in Recent Decades

Avg. CAT Loss Component of the Combined Ratio

by Decade

1960s: 1.04 1970s: 0.85 1980s: 1.31 1990s: 3.39

2000s: 3.52

Combined Ratio Points

Nu

mb

er

Geophysical (earthquake, tsunami, volcanic activity)

Climatological (temperature extremes, drought, wildfire)

Meteorological (storm)

Hydrological (flood, mass movement)

Natural Disasters in the United States, 1980 – 2010Number of Events (Annual Totals 1980 – 2010)

Source: MR NatCatSERVICE 146

There were a record 247 natural disaster events in

the US in 2010

For the second year in a row, insured losses due to

weather perils in the U.S. in 2010 were the highest on

record for a year without a hurricane landfall.

Insured Losses Due to Weather Perils in the U.S.: 1980 – 2010

Sources: MR NatCatSERVICE, Property Claims Services 147© 2011 Munich Re

(Tropical Cyclone, Thunderstorm, and Winter Storm only)

U.S. Thunderstorm Loss Trends, 1980 – 2010 (Annual Totals)

Source: Property Claims Service, MR NatCatSERVICE 155

Thunderstorm losses in 2010 totaled $9.5 billion, the

3rd highest ever

Average thunderstorm losses have now quintupled since

the early 1980s

Hurricanes get all the headlines, but thunderstorms are consistent

producers of large scale loss

158

Top 12 Most Costly Disastersin US History

(Insured Losses, 2009, $ Billions)

Sources: PCS; Insurance Information Institute inflation adjustments.

$11.3 $12.6$17.2

$22.2 $22.7

$45.1

$8.5$8.1$6.6$6.2$5.2$4.2

$0$5

$10$15$20$25$30$35$40$45$50

Jeanne(2004)

Frances(2004)

Rita (2005)

Hugo(1989)

Ivan (2004)

Charley(2004)

Wilma(2005)

Ike (2008)

Northridge(1994)

Andrew(1992)

9/11Attacks(2001)

Katrina(2005)

8 of the 12 Most Expensive Disasters in US History Have Occurred Since 2004;

8 of the Top 12 Disasters Affected FL

Hurricane Katrina Remains, By Far, the Most Expensive Insurance Event in US

and World History

160

Total Value of Insured Coastal Exposure

(2007, $ Billions)

Source: AIR Worldwide

$224.4$191.9

$158.8$146.9$132.8

$92.5$85.6$60.6$55.7$51.8$54.1

$14.9

$479.9$635.5

$772.8$895.1

$2,378.9$2,458.6

$0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000

FloridaNew York

TexasMassachusetts

New JerseyConnecticut

LouisianaS. Carolina

VirginiaMaine

North CarolinaAlabamaGeorgia

DelawareNew Hampshire

MississippiRhode Island

Maryland

$895B Insured Coastal

Exposure in Texas in 2007

In 2007, Florida Still Ranked as the #1 Most Exposed State to Hurricane Loss, with

$2.459 Trillion Exposure, but Texas is very exposed too, and ranked #3 with $895B

in insured coastal exposure

The Insured Value of All Coastal Property Was $8.9 Trillion in 2007, Up 24% from $7.2 Trillion in 2004

www.iii.org

Thank you for your timeand your attention!

Twitter: twitter.com/bob_hartwigDownload: www.iii.org/presentations

Insurance Information Institute Online: