the rise of captive insurance companies: are they … insurance.pdfcaptive tax issues (cont.) i.r.s....

38
The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They also an Opportunity to Address Obamacare? Moderator: Ken Levinson, Partner | Faegre Baker Daniels Jeff Brimer, COO | Alexius, LLC Kaya Bromley, General Counsel | Freedom Care Benefits

Upload: others

Post on 16-Jul-2020

11 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They also an Opportunity to Address Obamacare? Moderator: Ken Levinson, Partner | Faegre Baker Daniels Jeff Brimer, COO | Alexius, LLC Kaya Bromley, General Counsel | Freedom Care Benefits

Page 2: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

Presenters

Jeff Brimer COO Alexius, LLC (720) 360-1675 EXT 101 [email protected]

Kaya Bromley General Counsel FreedomCare Benefits (248) 302-4656 [email protected]

Ken Levinson Partner Faegre Baker Daniels +1 612 766 8341 [email protected]

Page 3: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

What Is A “Captive” And How Does It Work?

► Captives are fully licensed, fully regulated, private insurance companies ► Domiciled (formed and regulated) in a US state (or D.C.), or foreign country ► Owned by corporation as a “parent owned” captive, or by a group or industry, to

insure specified risks ► Requires arms-length pricing on premiums paid by insureds to the captive ► Frequently will insure deductibles or uninsurable risks under commercial

programs; a cash funding arrangement to assure assets available in future to pay claims

► May use a “front,” such as utilizing the pre-existing licensing/registration of a commercial carrier (and then reinsure the specified risks into the owned captive)

► Captives can access reinsurance markets (only accessible by “insurance company”)

(c) 2015 Faegre Baker Daniels LLP. All Rights Reserved. 3

Page 4: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

What Is A “Captive” And How Does It Work? (cont.)

►Requires capital from the owner(s) and appropriate premiums to cover risks, and provide reserves, per regulatory requirements (such as 3:1 ratio)

►Tax Benefits (non “831(b)”): can accelerate deductions for insurance reserves before claims are paid out; no state income tax on investment earnings or underwriting profits ► Tax Benefits of an 831(b) captive: smaller size insurer, premiums

paid are still tax deductible, may not receive more than $1.2MM in premiums annually, taxed only on its investment income

►Tax Costs: must pay prescribed state premium taxes (if domestic captive) ► If foreign domiciled captive, must consider application of US Subpart

F (CFC) rules and exposure to federal excise tax on premium payments (c) 2015 Faegre Baker Daniels LLP.

All Rights Reserved. 4

Page 5: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

Business Issues Relating to Captives

► What are business objectives and expected benefits from captive? ► What insurance risks are appropriate for the captive?

► Traditional uses include highly predictable coverages/deductibles (e.g., workers comp, auto liability, general liability, etc.)

► Nontraditional, customized or volatile risks may also be written ► Strategic integration with commercial insurance program ► Continuing evaluation of potential flexible uses of captive to respond to changes in

the commercial insurance market, available lines of coverage, or exclusions ► When should the agreed risks be written by the captive?

► Apply a “crawl, walk, run” staged approach, or a more accelerated timetable based on business needs or market conditions?

► How to utilize benefits of captives? ► What kind of captive is most appropriate, and where is it to be domiciled?

(c) 2015 Faegre Baker Daniels LLP. All Rights Reserved. 5

Page 6: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

Captive Tax Issues (cont.)

► I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations ► Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established general principles to

determine tax qualification of certain captive insurance companies ► IRS Rulings control interpretation and audit results by IRS agents ► Rulings addressed 25 years of interpretative disputes with taxpayers

► The 2002 Rulings covered three types of captives: ► Parent/Subsidiary Captives (captive insures risks of its parent and, perhaps,

unrelated risks) ► Brother/Sister Captives (captive insures risks of its commonly-owned

brother/sister affiliated companies, not its parent) ► Group Captives (captive insures specific, common risk(s) of a group of

unrelated owners)

6 (c) 2015 Faegre Baker Daniels LLP.

All Rights Reserved.

Page 7: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations

►Key common principles established in 2002 (and subsequently reinforced) by the IRS for captives to qualify for Federal tax benefits: ► All premiums must be pooled by the captive; all assets (premiums,

reserves, surplus) must be available to pay all risks being insured ► Captive cannot loan funds to its parent, owner(s) or insureds ► No parent or insured can guarantee the captive’s performance

►Additional requirements for qualification as an “insurance company”: ► Adequate risk shifting and risk distribution; requires that a loss by

one policyholder is not borne in substantial part by such insured’s premiums

► Captive must still meet business purpose, administrative/regulatory requirements, arms-length pricing, adequate capitalization, proper documentation, etc.

(c) 2015 Faegre Baker Daniels LLP. All Rights Reserved. 7

Page 8: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

Example of Captive Structure

(c) 2015 Faegre Baker Daniels LLP. All Rights Reserved. 8

Parent Risks

Reinsurer

Possible Reinsurance / Stop Loss

Parent Corp.

Subsidiary 1 Captive

Risks from Subsidiaries

Subsidiary 2

Third Party Risks

Page 9: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

Example of Franchise Captive Structure – Franchisor Opportunities

9

Risks, Deductibles from Franchisees

Possible Reinsurance / Stop Loss

Franchisor Owner

Franchisee 1

Reinsurer

Franchisor Corp.

Owned Stores Subsidiary Captive

Franchisee 2

Franchisee 3

Franchisee 4

Parent Risks, Deductibles

Subsidiary/Stores Risks, Deductibles

Reinsurance into captive

(c) 2015 Faegre Baker Daniels LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Fronting Insurer

Page 10: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

Some Factors in Domicile Selection

► Domestic ► Incorporated entity, formally licensed/regulated by state regulators ► If corporation-owned captive, should be included in group’s consolidated financial statements

(subject to confirmation by auditors) and Federal tax consolidated return filing ► No state income tax (on captive’s income, underwriting profits, investments, etc.), but premiums are

subject to state premium taxes ► If company were to consider in future using captive for employee benefits risks, or terrorism

coverage, must have a “domestic” captive ► Offshore

► Incorporated entity, formally licensed/regulated by foreign government regulators ► Generally not part of consolidated group for Federal tax purposes

► Not usually subject to foreign premium taxes, but other fees, licensing costs may soak up savings ► Subject to US Federal excise tax on premium payments to offshore insurer/reinsurer (4% or 1%,

respectively), unless domiciled in favorable tax treaty jurisdiction ► Likely a “Controlled Foreign Corporation” subjecting US Shareholders to current taxation

► Exception to possible CFC classification: Make a US “domestication” election

(c) 2015 Faegre Baker Daniels LLP. All Rights Reserved. 10

Page 11: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

IRS Audit Activity in Captive Area

► Issues in Audit ► The arrangement doesn’t qualify as “insurance” (too few insureds,

too much concentration of risk, loan backs to parent/insureds) ► Compare the recent Tax Court decision in Rent-a-Center regarding the

“risk distribution”/concentration of risk requirements in IRS rulings… ► The captive doesn’t qualify as an “insurance company” (inadequately

capitalized, improper/unjustified premium amounts, inadequate reserving)

► State “conformity” issues (if captive doesn’t qualify Federally, what is impact for State tax purposes)?

► FIN 48/UTP reporting positions, book and tax reserve issues ► Effects of Federal tax audit adjustment on multiple years

►How to Avoid Problems With YOUR Captive? 11

(c) 2015 Faegre Baker Daniels LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Page 12: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

$465 Billion

12 (C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC

All Rights Reserved

Page 13: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

►Penalty A

►Penalty B

►Catch-all Penalty

13 (C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC

All Rights Reserved

Page 14: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

►Penalty A - $2,084

►Penalty B - $3,126

►Catch-all Penalty ($100 Per EE Per Day) 14

(C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC All Rights Reserved

Page 15: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

Penalty A Example:

Scalia Construction Company has 300 Full-Time Employees. Scalia does not offer insurance. One EE receives a subsidy on the exchange. What is the penalty? $2,084 x (300 – 80*) = $485,480 * 30 in 2016

15 (C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC

All Rights Reserved

Page 16: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

Penalty B Example:

Roberts Dairy Farm has 2,000 Full Time Employees. Roberts offers insurance but the insurance does not provide minimum value. One thousand of Roberts’ Employees receive a subsidy on the exchange. How much is Roberts’ Penalty? $3,126 x 1,000 = $3,126,000

16 (C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC

All Rights Reserved

Page 17: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

Catchall Penalty Example:

C. Thomas Beverage Company has 500 Full-Time Employees. C. Thomas offers insurance but violates the 90 day rules. C. Thomas does not find out about this violation for 12 months. What is C. Thomas’ Penalty? 500 x 365 x $100 = $18,250,000

17 (C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC

All Rights Reserved

Page 18: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

►DOL Audit Penalties ►IRS Audits ►Lawsuits ►OSHA Whistleblower

Actions ►ERISA Violations (510)

►Costs of Compliance ►Legal / Consulting

Fees ►Audit Preparation ►Intangible Costs

18 (C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC

All Rights Reserved

Page 19: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

Three Steps to ACA Compliance

19 (C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC

All Rights Reserved

Page 20: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

Step One:

Avoid Penalty A

20 (C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC

All Rights Reserved

Page 21: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

Offer Minimum Essential Coverage To All Full-Time Employees and

Dependents.

21 (C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC

All Rights Reserved

Page 22: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

The MEC Strategy (Skinny Plans)

Limit Exposure to

Penalty A Is it legal?

Does it mean I have

no conscience?

Satisfies Individual Mandate

22 (C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC

All Rights Reserved

Page 23: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

Step Two:

Avoid Penalty B

23 (C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC

All Rights Reserved

Page 24: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

Offer Affordable Insurance that Provides Minimum Value Coverage to All Full-Time

Employees

24 (C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC

All Rights Reserved

Page 25: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

The Minimum Value Strategy

Walk-Away Plans

Minimum Participation

What if Too Many

Employee$ Accept it? (Pricing)

Hedging By Also Offering

MEC

25 (C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC

All Rights Reserved

Page 26: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

Step 3

26

Document. Document. Document.

(C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC All Rights Reserved

Page 27: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

Why?

This is how the IRS will determine:

A. Employer Penalties

B. Individual Penalties

27 (C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC

All Rights Reserved

Page 28: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

(C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC All Rights Reserved 28

Page 29: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

Good News? “Good Faith!”

29 (C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC

All Rights Reserved

Page 30: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

How to show “Good Faith” attempt to comply?

1. Adopt a compliant plan

2. Comply with all reporting requirements

30 (C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC

All Rights Reserved

Page 31: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

Strategy

31 (C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC

All Rights Reserved

Page 32: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

32

Your Peace

Of Mind

Compliance Guarantee

Satisfy Penalty A & B

Reporting Compliance

Tax-Efficient 831(b)

(C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC All Rights Reserved

Page 33: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

FreedomCare is a Captive Insurance Company designed specifically to comply with the ACA mandates

& To deliver to employers of all sizes the benefits of self-insurance that have been enjoyed by larger companies

for decades.

(C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC All Rights Reserved 33

Page 34: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

The Benefits of FreedomCare FreedomCare is a South Dakota Series Business Trust licensed as a captive insurance company.

Simplified formation process • Extremely cost effective: Formation and On-going • Minimal time requirements by employer • Reinsured by Lloyd's of London

Every employer gets their own “Cell Trust” captive • Each cell is its own insurance company • No joint and several liability • No co-mingling of assets or risk pools • Potential tax benefits under IRC §831(b)

(C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC All Rights Reserved 34

Page 35: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

How Does The IRC §831(b) Work?

For those employers who wish to take the IRC §831(b) election, these factors need to be considered:

Note: The decision to create a captive should never be made solely on the tax benefits, and should only be made after consulting your tax advisors.

• Only applies to small P&C insurance companies with less than $1.2 million in premiums.

• If qualified, the captive company only pays tax on investment income; any underwriting income is not taxed.

• Underwriting losses are also not available, even if a loss is experienced (captive will still pay tax on investment income).

(C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC All Rights Reserved 35

Page 36: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

How does FreedomCare comply with the ACA?

Satisfies Penalty A By offering Minimum Essential Coverage

Satisfies Penalty B By offering a plan that provides Minimum Value

(C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC All Rights Reserved 36

Page 37: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

The Intent of the ACA

Every qualifying employee gets MEC Even if they opt-out of the MVP, they will have

satisfied their Individual Mandate FreedomCare differs from walk-away plans in which

lower wage workers who do not qualify for Medicaid end up with nothing. With FreedomCare, they are no longer on the hook for the Individual Mandate.

Meets the Good Corporate Citizen standard

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

(C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC All Rights Reserved 37

Page 38: The Rise of Captive Insurance Companies: Are They … Insurance.pdfCaptive Tax Issues (cont.) I.R.S. Rulings and Structuring Considerations Three Revenue Rulings in late 2002 established

Thank you! Questions?

38 (C) Copyright 2015 FreedomCare Benefits, LLC

All Rights Reserved